In the above article [Canal CE, Morgan D, Felsing D, Kondabolu K, Rowland NE, Robertson KL, Sakhuja R, and Booth RG (2014) J Pharmacol Exp Ther 349:310–318; doi:10.1124/jpet.113.212373], the pA2 values are indicated incorrectly in three places.
Under Results and in Table 1 on page 313, the pA2 value of 2.64 (0.05) should be 6.36 (0.05). In addition, under Results on page 313, the pA2 value of 2.43 (0.17) should be 6.57 (0.17).
The authors regret these errors and any inconvenience they may have caused.
- Copyright © 2014 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics