QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jpet.105.098251v1 317/2/762    most recent Submit a response View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Battram, C. Articles by Trifilieff, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Battram, C. Articles by Trifilieff, A.

GASTROINTESTINAL, HEPATIC, PULMONARY, AND RENAL

In Vitro and in Vivo Pharmacological Characterization of 5-[(R)-2-(5,6-Diethyl-indan-2-ylamino)-1-hydroxy-ethyl]-8-hydroxy-1H-quinolin-2-one (Indacaterol), a Novel Inhaled ₂ Adrenoceptor Agonist with a 24-h Duration of Action

Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Respiratory Diseases Area, Horsham, United Kingdom (C.B., S.J.C., M.R.D., R.A.F., J.R.L.-D., C.A.L., L.M., R.J.T.) and Basel, Switzerland (B.C., D.F., J.R.F., A.T.)

Received November 7, 2005; accepted January 20, 2006.

	Abstract

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Here, we describe the preclinical pharmacological profile of 5-[(R)-2-(5,6-diethyl-indan-2-ylamino)-1-hydroxy-ethyl]-8-hydroxy-1H-quinolin-2-one (indacaterol), a novel, chirally pure inhaled ₂ adrenoceptor agonist, in comparison with marketed drugs. Indacaterol is close to a full agonist at the human ₂ adrenoceptor (E_max = 73 ± 1% of the maximal effect of isoprenaline; pEC₅₀ = 8.06 ± 0.02), whereas salmeterol displays only partial efficacy (38 ± 1%). The functional selectivity profile of indacaterol over ₁ human adrenoceptors is similar to that of formoterol, whereas its ₃ adrenoceptor selectivity profile is similar to that of formoterol and salbutamol. In isolated superfused guinea pig trachea, indacaterol has a fast onset of action (30 ± 4 min) similar to formoterol and salbutamol, and a long duration of action (529 ± 99 min) comparable with salmeterol. In the conscious guinea pig, when given intratracheally as a dry powder, indacaterol inhibits 5-hydroxytryptamine-induced bronchoconstriction for at least 24 h, whereas salmeterol, formoterol, and salbutamol have durations of action of 12, 4, and 2 h, respectively. When given via nebulization to anesthetized rhesus monkeys, all of the compounds dose-dependently inhibit methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction, although indacaterol produces the most prolonged bronchoprotective effect and induces the lowest increase in heart rate for a similar degree of antibronchoconstrictor activity. In conclusion, the preclinical profile of indacaterol suggests that this compound has a superior duration of action compatible with once-daily dosing in human, together with a fast onset of action and an improved cardiovascular safety profile over marketed inhaled ₂ adrenoceptor agonists.

Salbutamol is an inhaled ₂ adrenoceptor agonist that provides rapid bronchodilatation and has been widely used over the past 30 years. However, its major drawback is its short duration of action (4-6 h), requiring the drug to be administered several times a day. Two longer acting inhaled ₂ adrenoceptor agonists, formoterol and salmeterol, are now available and are used in the management of asthma and COPD (Sutherland, 2004). These two drugs have a bronchodilating effect lasting for 12 h after a single inhalation and are therefore given twice daily. Despite the decrease in dosing frequency with the longer acting inhaled ₂ adrenoceptor agonists, patient compliance is still an issue (Ying et al., 1999). In addition, the recent launch of tiotropium bromide, a once-daily inhaled muscarinic antagonist for the treatment of COPD (Gross, 2004), and the development of once-daily inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of asthma (Dent, 2002; Wardlaw et al., 2004), would suggest that a new inhaled ₂ adrenoceptor agonist with a duration of action compatible with once-daily administration is likely to become the future bronchodilator of choice, either on its own or when used with a once-daily muscarinic antagonist in COPD and when used with a once-daily inhaled corticosteroid for the treatment of asthma.

Systemic exposure to ₂ adrenoceptor agonists results in predictable adverse events such as tremor, palpitation, headache, muscle cramps, and hypokalemia. These adverse events are minimized when these drugs are given by inhalation; salbutamol, salmeterol, and formoterol are perceived to be safe at the recommended clinical doses. However, the therapeutic margin of these drugs is rather small, such that doubling the dose of, e.g., salmeterol and formoterol, can result in a significant increase in the incidence of side effects (Guhan et al., 2000; Sovani et al., 2004). Furthermore, such undesirable side effects have been linked to reduced compliance to treatment (White and Sander, 1999). Therefore, a higher therapeutic margin would be desirable for the new generation of inhaled ₂ adrenoceptor agonists.

5-[(R)-2-(5,6-Diethyl-indan-2-ylamino)-1-hydroxy-ethyl]-8-hydroxy-1H-quinolin-2-one (indacaterol) (Fig. 1), previously known as QAB149, is a novel, chirally pure inhaled ₂ adrenoceptor agonist that was discovered in a program to identify compounds with a duration of action compatible with once-daily dosing in human, combined with a fast onset of action and an increased therapeutic index compared with the available inhaled ₂ adrenoceptor agonists. Here, we report the preclinical in vitro and in vivo pharmacological characteristics of indacaterol and compare the properties of this compound to those of the marketed inhaled ₂ adrenoceptor agonists salbutamol, formoterol, and salmeterol (Fig. 1).

View larger version (13K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Chemical structure of indacaterol, formoterol, salmeterol, and salbutamol.

	Materials and Methods

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

In Vitro Cell-Based Assays. Chinese hamster ovary cells stably transfected with human adrenoceptors (₁, ₂, or ₃; Novartis) were grown adherently and maintained in Ham's F-12 Nutrient Mix + GlutaMAX-1, containing 10% fetal calf serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 0.5 mg/ml Geneticin (G-418) at 37°C in 5% CO₂. Cells were subcultured at a ratio between 1:10 and 1:20 twice weekly. Membrane preparations were made when cells were between 70 and 90% confluence. Cells were suspended in buffer (10 mM HEPES and 10 mM EDTA, pH 7.4) at 4°C and disrupted with a homogenizer (5 times 5-s bursts with an IKA T8 Ultra Turrax using a 1- to 50-ml S8N-8G dispersing element; IKA Labortechnik, Staufen, Germany). The homogenate was then centrifuged at 48,000g for 25 min. The resulting pellet was resuspended in buffer at 4°C, rehomogenized as described above, and centrifuged at 48,000g for a further 25 min. The resulting pellet was resuspended in buffer (10 mM HEPES and 0.1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4), and the protein was determined by Bio-Rad protein assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).

[¹²⁵I]Iodo-(±)-cyanopindolol (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Boston, MA) binding assays were performed with membrane preparations (10 µg of protein/well) in a final assay volume of 250 µl in a Hanks' buffered saline solution containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin, pH 7.4 (assay buffer), in the presence of 100 µM guanosine 5'-triphosphate to ensure monophasic binding curves. For saturation binding experiments, up to 600 pM [¹²⁵I]iodo-(±)-cyanopindolol was used for ₁ and ₂ and up to 1600 pM for ₃. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 10 µM alprenolol. For competition binding, [¹²⁵I]iodo-(±)-cyanopindolol was used at 10 pM for ₁ and ₂ and 120 pM for ₃. Membranes were incubated for 3 h at 22°C, filtered through Millipore GF/B filters [containing 0.5% (w/v) polyethylenimine per well] using ice-cold wash buffer (75 mM Tris; pH 7.4).

Increases in intracellular cAMP levels were determined using AlphaScreen technology (Packard, Shelton, CT). Cells were harvested and transferred to 96-well OptiPlates (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences) at a concentration of 4 x 10⁴ cells/well, before incubation with agonist or vehicle for 1 h at room temperature in Hanks' buffered saline solution supplemented with 5 mM HEPES and 0.1% bovine serum albumin. Cells were lysed using AlphaScreen reagents, and after an additional 1 h, the plate was read on a Packard Fusion plate reader. The concentration of cAMP in the samples was calculated from a standard curve.

Animals. Guinea pigs were housed in plastic cages in air-conditioned rooms at 24°C in a 12-h light/dark cycle. Food and water were available ad libitum. All animals were acclimatized for a period of at least 7 days upon arrival before any experimental work began. The studies reported here conform to the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986.

A group of 17 male rhesus monkeys (Centre for Primatology, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France) was used. All animals were kept in colonies in a specialized primate unit, and the interval between experiments was a minimum of 21 days. All experiments were carried out with the approval of the Veterinary Authority of the City of Basel (Kantonales Veterinaeramt, Basel-Stadt, Switzerland).

Isolated Guinea Pig Organ Preparation. Male Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs (350-700 g; Charles River, Margate, UK) were killed by exposure to an increasing concentration of CO₂; their trachea and heart were removed and placed in ice-cold oxygenated (95% O₂, 5% CO₂) Krebs-Henseleit solution (118 mM NaCl, 25 mM NaHCO₃, 11.1 mM glucose, 4.7 mM KCl, 2.5 mM CaCl₂, 1.2 mM MgSO₄, and 1.2 mM Na₂PO₄).

The method used for the electrically stimulated tracheal strip is a modification of a previously published technique (Coleman and Nials, 1989). The trachea was cut into rings of three to five cartilage bands in width, which were subsequently opened into strips by cutting the cartilage opposite the smooth muscle band at 90° to each ring. Each strip was set up in a superfusion system and attached to an isometric force transducer (Fort 10; WPI, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, UK) under a resting tension of 1 g and superfused (1.2 ml/min) with oxygenated Krebs-Henseleit solution at 37°C containing 2.8 µM indomethacin. After a 1-h equilibration period, phasic contractile responses were induced by electrical stimulation with 10-s trains of square-wave pulses of 5-Hz frequency and 0.1-ms duration every 2 min. A supramaximal voltage was selected for each tissue within 10 to 15% of the maximal response following construction of a voltage-response curve from 8 to 16 V. After a 1-h equilibration period using the above-mentioned stimulation parameters, a baseline contractile response was determined over a 20-min period before the superfusion fluid was changed to Krebs-Henseleit solution containing compounds for 30 min. After this time, the superfusion fluid was changed back to compound-free Krebs-Henseleit solution for the remaining 11.5 h of the experiment.

The left atrium was dissected, mounted between two parallel electrodes (Radnoti Glass, Monrovia, CA) in 25-ml organ baths containing oxygenated Krebs-Henseleit solution at 32°C, and attached to an isometric force transducer (Fort 10; WPI) under a resting tension of 1 g. Atria were electrically stimulated with square-wave pulses of 3-Hz frequency and 2.5-ms duration. The voltage selected for each atrium was that of threshold plus 30% (threshold is defined as the voltage required to induce minimal changes in cardiac force). After a 1-h equilibration period, the viability of each preparation was determined by an increase in force of contraction upon the addition of 100 nM isoprenaline to the bath. After washout of isoprenaline and recovery to a stable baseline, cumulative concentration-response curves were constructed to compounds.

Isoprenaline was dissolved in distilled water containing 100 µM ascorbic acid. All other compounds were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide, and working solutions were made up in Krebs-Henseleit solution. For both preparations, tension changes were monitored and recorded with Buxco preamplifiers and Biosystem XA software (Buxco Europe Limited, Winchester, UK).

In Vivo Duration of Action and Tachyphylaxis Studies in the Guinea Pig. Male Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs (450-500 g; supplied by Harlan, Horst, The Netherlands) were placed in a plethysmograph chamber (Buxco, Wilmington, NC) and left to acclimatize for 5 min. Bias flow (air removed from chamber) was set at 2.5 l/min, the nebulizer air flow was set at 8 l/min, and the trickle flow (the flow through nebulizer chamber) was set at 1.2 l/min. Four milliliters of nebulent was placed in the nebulizer. There were four chambers attached to each nebulizer. The guinea pigs were then challenged with aerosolized saline (0.9% NaCl) for 1 min using an ultrasonic nebulizer (deVilbiss, Wollaston, West Midlands, UK) to obtain the airway baseline reading. This was followed by aerosolized 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) (175 µg/ml for 1 min) to determine the guinea pig's sensitivity to the spasmogen (pretreatment control). Each 1-min challenge was followed by a 15-min lung function measurement to determine Penh (area under the curve). The dose of 5-HT was determined from a dose-response curve in a previous study (data not shown) to give a reproducible submaximal bronchoconstriction. The pressure waveforms generated by respiration of the guinea pigs were analyzed by Buxco software, and enhanced pause (Penh) was calculated on a breath by breath basis as described previously (Chong et al., 1998). The following day animals were anesthetized with a short-acting anesthetic (4% halothane in oxygen/nitrous oxide) for 4 min and were dosed with compounds or vehicle (lactose) by dry-powder intratracheal instillation. Before use, the compounds (indacaterol maleate, formoterol fumarate, salbutamol hemisulfate, and salmeterol xinafoate) were blended with lactose, using a bore milling technique. Each intratracheal dose was 5 mg of compound blend or lactose. The animals were then rechallenged with saline and 5-HT (175 µg/ml for 1 min) 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 h after treatment.

Once the dose-response and duration of action of each compound had been determined, the tachyphylaxis study was performed. In a series of experiments, male Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs (500-550 g) were challenged with aerosolized saline followed by aerosolized 5-HT; Penh was recorded as described above (predose control). From days 1 to 5, the same animals were anesthetized and dosed daily with compounds or vehicle as described above. The animals were challenged with saline and 5-HT 2 h after treatment on days 1 and 5. The number of repeated treatments was based on clinical studies demonstrating that tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol was apparent after two doses and persisted up to the seventh dose (Kalra et al., 1996).

Bronchoprotection and Cardiovascular Side Effects in the Anesthetized Rhesus Monkey. All experimental details have been described previously (Fozard and Buescher, 2001). In brief, cardiovascular and respiratory parameters were measured in anesthetized male rhesus monkeys at rest and after exposure to a submaximal dose of methacholine given by aerosol. Forty minutes later, aerosolized ₂ adrenoceptor agonist or vehicle was administered for 10 min, and airway resistance changes (induced by aerosolized methacholine), cardiovascular parameters, and serum potassium concentrations were measured at regular intervals for up to 285 min thereafter. The administered dose was calculated for each animal, and the mean dose for each group was presented. Salbutamol hemisulfate and formoterol fumarate were dissolved in 0.9% NaCl (saline). Indacaterol hydrochlorate was dissolved in saline containing 0.03% ethanol. Salmeterol free-base was suspended in saline containing 1 mg/ml gum arabic. In vehicle-treated animals (n = 32), heart rate, serum potassium concentrations, and bronchoconstriction responses to methacholine were not significantly affected.

Data Analysis. K_d values for [¹²⁵I]iodo-(±)-cyanopindolol and ligand IC₅₀ values were calculated with a nonlinear curve fit in Prism version 4.02 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA). Ligand IC₅₀ values were transformed to K_i values (Cheng and Prusoff, 1973). The cAMP concentration-response data were fitted to a sigmoidal curve (slope not fixed) in Prism.

In the guinea pig isolated tracheal strip preparation, the onset of action for each concentration of compound was taken as the time from the start of compound superfusion until maximal inhibition of contraction to electrical stimulation was observed. The duration of action was defined as the time taken from the end of compound superfusion to 50% recovery from maximal inhibition. The percentage maximal inhibition at each concentration of a given compound was used to construct a concentration-response curve to calculate potency in Prism. For the isolated atria preparation, increases in force of contraction to each concentration of agonist were expressed as the percentage of increase from baseline contraction.

For the in vivo guinea pig experiments, percentage of inhibition was calculated for each compound-treated animal versus vehicle- and time-matched animals. For the duration of action studies, analysis of variance was calculated followed by a one-sided Dunnett's multiple comparison test versus the time-matched vehicle control. Significance was determined as p < 0.05. For the tachyphylaxis studies, differences between a single treatment (day 1) and daily treatment for 5 days (day 5) were determined using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test.

For the rhesus monkey experiments, percentage of inhibition of bronchoconstriction or percentage of increase in heart rate was calculated for each compound-treated animal related to vehicle- and time-matched animals; statistical significance (p < 0.05) was determined using a Student's t test for unpaired observations.

	Results

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
In Vitro Binding and Functional Activity at the Human Adrenoceptors. The receptor density on the three stably transfected clones and the dissociation constant of [¹²⁵I]iodo-(±)-cyanopindolol were measured using saturation experiments. B_max values (in femtomoles per milligram of protein) of 334 ± 51, 356 ± 22, and 435 ± 40 and K_d values (in picomolar) of 33 ± 5, 20 ± 5, and 301 ± 35 were found for the ₁ (n = 4), ₂ (n = 4), and ₃ (n = 5) adrenoceptors, respectively.

The binding affinity of the ₂ adrenoceptor agonists for the ₂ adrenoceptor, as calculated by their dissociation constants, was as follows: salmeterol > formoterol > indacaterol > salbutamol (Table 1). All of the compounds bound to the other two adrenoceptors with various level of selectivity. Salmeterol was the most selective compound followed by formoterol, indacaterol, and salbutamol (Table 1).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 1 Dissociation constants for the 2 adrenoceptor agonists at the human adrenoceptors Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. of the number of experiment indicated in parentheses.

The functional potency and intrinsic efficacy of the compounds was studied by measuring cAMP production in cells stably transfected with human adrenoceptors. The order of functional potency for the compounds was the same as their binding affinity for the ₂ adrenoceptor (Table 2). However, a clear difference was observed in their intrinsic activity at the ₂ adrenoceptor. Salmeterol and salbutamol induced approximately 40% of the maximal effect of isoprenaline, whereas the maximum effect of indacaterol and formoterol was 73 and 90%, respectively, of the maximal response to isoprenaline (Fig. 2; Table 2). Salmeterol and salbutamol had no agonistic activity at the ₁ adrenoceptor, whereas formoterol and indacaterol were very weak ₁ agonists. With the exception of salmeterol, all of the compounds were full agonists at the ₃ adrenoceptor; ₃ versus ₂ selectivity was similar for indacaterol, formoterol, and salbutamol; and salmeterol had the best ₃/₂ selectivity profile (Fig. 2; Table 2).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 2 Functional properties for the 2 adrenoceptor agonists at the human adrenoceptors Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. of n different experiments.

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Effect of the 2 adrenoceptor agonists on intracellular cAMP levels at the human 1 (middle), 2 (left), and 3 (right) adrenoceptors. Data are presented as percentage of maximal isoprenaline-induced cAMP increase. Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M. of the number of experiments indicated in Table 2.

In Vitro Functional Activity in the Isolated Guinea Pig Organs. In the isolated guinea pig trachea (a ₂ adrenoceptor-containing preparation), all of the compounds inhibited electrically induced contraction in a concentration-dependent manner. Formoterol was the most potent compound, with a pEC₅₀ value of 9.13 ± 0.12. Indacaterol (pEC₅₀ = 8.23 ± 0.13) had similar potency to salmeterol (pEC₅₀ = 8.56 ± 0.16); salbutamol was of lower potency (pEC₅₀ = 7.82 ± 0.32) (Fig. 3). The onset and duration of action of each of the compounds were derived using the concentration closest to the pEC₅₀ values calculated from the concentration-response curves: 1 nM for formoterol (n = 4), 3 nM for indacaterol (n = 5) and salmeterol (n = 5), and 10 nM for salbutamol (n = 5). The onset was fast for indacaterol (30 ± 4 min), formoterol (32 ± 1 min), and salbutamol (28 ± 3 min), whereas it was much slower for salmeterol (169 ± 32 min). The durations of action of indacaterol (529 ± 99 min) and salmeterol (475 ± 130 min) were greater than they were for formoterol (158 ± 30 min) or salbutamol (22 ± 9 min) (Fig. 4). The inhibitory effect of the four ₂ adrenoceptor agonists was reversed by the adrenoceptor antagonists propranolol (0.1 µM) and sotalol (10 µM) (data not shown).

View larger version (17K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Concentration response for the 2 adrenoceptor agonists on the electrically stimulated guinea pig trachea (left) and left atria (right) preparation. For the tracheal preparation, concentration-response curves were derived from Fig. 4, using the maximal inhibition observed at each concentration. For the left atria preparation, compounds were added in a cumulative manner, and increase in tension was recorded. Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M. of three to five experiments for the tracheal preparation, and the number of experiments is indicated in parentheses for the left atria preparation.

View larger version (53K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Effect of the 2 adrenoceptor agonists on the electrically stimulated guinea pig tracheal strip preparation. Tracheal strips were superfused for the first 30 min with compounds, and inhibition of electrical field stimulation was recorded for up to 12 h. Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M. of three to five experiments per concentration. Concentrations are 0.3 (), 1 (), 3 (), 10 (), 30 (), 60 (), 100 (), 300 (), and 1000 nM ().

Dose Response and Duration of Action in the Conscious Guinea Pig. Two hours after treatment with indacaterol, salmeterol, and salbutamol, a dose-dependent inhibition of 5-HT-induced bronchoconstriction was observed, with a maximal effect of 85 ± 7, 86 ± 6, and 91 ± 7% for indacaterol (6.7 µg/kg), salmeterol (66.7 µg/kg), and salbutamol (223.2 µg/kg), respectively (Fig. 5). In this experiment, no dose response was observed for formoterol, with all doses being fully effective; the maximal inhibition was 93 ± 3% for a dose of 0.7 µg/kg (Fig. 5). In a different experiment, formoterol pretreatment at lower doses of 0.00007 and 0.0007 µg/kg administered 2 h before 5-HT exposure inhibited bronchoconstriction in a dose-related manner by 15 ± 17 and 36 ± 20%, respectively (n = 8).

View larger version (35K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5. Duration of action for the 2 adrenoceptor agonists in the conscious guinea pig. Groups of guinea pigs were treated intratracheally with either vehicle (lactose) or compounds, and inhibition of 5-HT-induced bronchoconstriction was measured at regular intervals up to 24 h post-treatment. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. of eight animals per group. Significance, p < 0.05, indicated by * is against the respective time-matched vehicle control animals.

When the ability of the compounds to induce tachyphylaxis was evaluated, none of the compounds was subject to desensitization at any of the doses tested (Fig. 6). Indeed, for indacaterol and formoterol, the inhibitory effect of each dose after 5-day treatment compared with that of a single treatment was enhanced and reached significance for the indacaterol dose of 0.006 and 0.6 µg/kg and for the formoterol dose of 0.0006 µg/kg. Such a phenomenon was not observed for salmeterol (Fig. 6).

View larger version (26K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 6. Tachyphylaxis experiment for indacaterol, formoterol, and salmeterol in the conscious guinea pig. Groups of guinea pigs were treated intratracheally with either vehicle (lactose) or compounds, and inhibition of 5-HT-induced bronchoconstriction was measured 2 h later. The same group of animals was then treated daily for the following 4 days, and protection against 5-HT-induced bronchoconstriction was measured 2 h after the last dose. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. of eight animals per group. Significance, p < 0.05, indicated by * or # is against the respective time-matched vehicle control animals and against the effects of a single-dose treatment, respectively.

View larger version (29K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 7. Effect of the 2 adrenoceptor agonists on methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction and baseline heart rate in the anesthetized rhesus monkey. A, dose-response curves. The bronchoprotective effect and heart rate changes were measured 5 min after commencement and at the end of the drug application, respectively. Animal numbers are indicated in parentheses. B, effect over time for indacaterol (n = 6), formoterol (n = 9), salmeterol (n = 6), and salbutamol (n = 4) at doses chosen to give 80% of maximal bronchoprotection for indacaterol, formoterol, and salbutamol or a dose to give just maximal bronchoprotection for salmeterol. Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M. Significance, p < 0.05, indicated by * is against the respective control values.

In a second set of experiments, the time course of bronchoprotection and changes in heart rate were studied for a single dose of each compound. We selected doses that induced approximately 80% bronchoprotection for indacaterol (12.5 µg/kg), formoterol (1.2 µg/kg), and salbutamol (27 µg/kg). Salmeterol was used at the dose that gave a just maximal bronchoprotective effect (5.5 µg/kg). Thus, at the 5-min time point, indacaterol, formoterol, and salbutamol had a similar bronchoprotective effect of approximately 70 to 80%, whereas salmeterol was only partially effective (bronchoprotective effect 47%). Salbutamol was short-acting in this model, with a bronchoprotective effect 95-min postdose not significantly different from control. Indacaterol had a significant bronchoprotective effect up to the last time point studied (275 min), whereas the bronchoprotective effects of salmeterol and formoterol only lasted up to 155 min (Fig. 7B). At the end of the treatment, all of the compounds induced an increase in heart rate. Salmeterol, formoterol, and salbutamol were of higher efficacy than indacaterol. This effect was short lasting for indacaterol, with the heart rate not significantly different from control values from 90 min onward. In contrast, the effect of the other three compounds on heart rate waned slowly and was still significant compared with control animals at the end of the experiment (275 min) (Fig. 7B). At these doses, none of the compounds had an effect on serum potassium, blood pressure, or respiratory rate (data not shown).

	Discussion

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
In this article, we have described the preclinical pharmacological profile of indacaterol, a novel inhaled ₂ adrenoceptor agonist being developed for once-daily use for the treatment of asthma and COPD.

Investigations regarding the binding activity of indacaterol to the human adrenoceptors reveal that this compound has similar binding affinity to the ₂ receptor and binding selectivity ratio over the other adrenoceptors as formoterol. Functional data indicate that indacaterol is a partial agonist with 2-fold higher intrinsic activity than salbutamol or salmeterol. It is accepted that a partial agonist can behave as an antagonist in the presence of an agonist with higher efficacy at the same receptor; in the case of the inhaled ₂ adrenoceptor agonists, such phenomenon could potentially result in an inhibitory action of rescue medicine (i.e., short-acting ₂ agonist such as salbutamol). Such an antagonistic effect has been reported for salmeterol, but not formoterol, a full agonist, in different in vitro systems, including the isolated human bronchi (Molimard et al., 1998). Therefore, based on the higher intrinsic activity of indacaterol compared with salmeterol, one would expect indacaterol to have somewhat lower antagonistic effects at the ₂ adrenoceptor. Indeed, in isolated human bronchi contracted with carbachol, salmeterol, but not indacaterol or formoterol, antagonize the isoprenaline response (Naline et al., 2005).

It is worth noting that the differences in intrinsic activities for the compounds observed at the ₂ adrenoceptor in the cell-based assays do not translate to the isolated superfused guinea pig tracheal preparation. This apparent discrepancy has been observed by other groups and is probably linked to the low magnitude of the contraction induced by the electrical field stimulation in the tracheal preparation (i.e., approximately 20 to 30% of the maximal response to carbachol). Indeed, it has been previously reported that both salmeterol and salbutamol behave as full agonists when tested against tracheal preparation at low tone (i.e., basal tone). If the tone is increased (i.e., precontracted with high concentrations of carbachol), then both salmeterol and salbutamol behave as partial agonists, whereas a full agonist, such as isoprenaline or formoterol, still has full efficacy (Lipworth and Grove, 1997).

Like formoterol, indacaterol is a low-partial agonist at the human ₁ adrenoceptor. It also has similar selectivity ratio to formoterol and salbutamol at the human ₃ adrenoceptor. It is always difficult to extrapolate the physiological activity of a compound based only on its receptor pharmacology profile in vitro, and an in vivo evaluation is always more relevant. In this respect, regardless of the in vitro selectivity profile of indacaterol, we have demonstrated in the rhesus monkey that, for an equivalent degree of bronchoprotection, indacaterol has a better cardiac safety profile than formoterol, salmeterol, and salbutamol. In humans, it has been reported that activity at the ₁ adrenoceptor might be responsible for some of the cardiovascular side effects often observed with ₂ adrenoceptor agonists (Levine and Leenen, 1989). This suggests that ₂ selective compounds could provide an improved side effect profile. However, despite having the best selectivity profile for ₂ over ₁ adrenoceptors, salmeterol does have cardiovascular side effects in human, suggesting that the importance of ₁/₂ selectivity is unclear in the clinic (Motomura et al., 1990). It is possible that these side effects could result from activating cardiac or systemic ₂ adrenoceptors. Indeed, tachycardia may result from dilatation of peripheral vasculature resulting in reflex sympathetic nervous system stimulation, thereby increasing inotropic and chronotropic effects. In addition, activation of ₂ adrenoceptors in both the left ventricle and the right atrium can directly increase heart rate. Therefore, even a "pure" ₂ agonist would be expected to have the potential for direct cardiovascular side effects (Motomura et al., 1990). In view of all of these potential mechanisms for generating cardiovascular side effects, it is important that the good overall cardiovascular side effect profile of indacaterol in the rhesus monkey has also been observed in clinical studies, both in asthma (Beeh et al., 2005; Chuchalin et al., 2005; Kanniess et al., 2005; Tarral et al., 2005) and COPD (Aubier et al., 2005; Beier et al., 2005). The physiological role of the ₃ adrenoceptor is still not firmly established, although it is thought to be involved in lipolysis (Philipson, 2002) and possibly in cardiac and vascular contractility (Gauthier et al., 2000). As a result, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions regarding the functional significance of the ₃ agonistic activity observed for all of the compounds in this study.

Although currently available inhaled ₂ adrenoceptor agonists are considered to be safe at their recommended therapeutic doses, they all exhibit a modest therapeutic window. To assess the therapeutic window for indacaterol, a comparison was made with the marketed ₂ adrenoceptor agonists in the rhesus monkey by evaluating the antibronchoconstrictive effect against aerosolized methacholine and the potential for systemic side effects as measured by increases in heart rate. Indacaterol, formoterol, and salbutamol are all able to inhibit methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction by more than 80%. In contrast, the maximal inhibition seen with salmeterol is 47%. The lower intrinsic activity of salmeterol against muscarinic agonist-induced airway contraction is a known phenomenon and has been described several times, notably in isolated human airways (Molimard et al., 1998). This has been attributed to a functional antagonism between muscarinic agonists and ₂ adrenoceptor agonists, probably because of the inhibition of adenylate cyclase by the muscarinic M2 receptor (Sarria et al., 2002). Regarding the increase in heart rate induced by the compounds, our results suggest that formoterol, salmeterol, and salbutamol would have a similar tendency to induce systemic side effects, whereas indacaterol would have a better therapeutic window. Clinical studies have shown that the side-effect profile of formoterol, salmeterol, and salbutamol are qualitatively similar (Bennett et al., 1994; Guhan et al., 2000; Rabe, 2001). Although a direct comparison of the clinical safety profile of indacaterol with the profiles of marketed inhaled ₂ adrenoceptor agonists is not yet available, indacaterol has demonstrated a good cardiovascular safety profile at a dose of up to 800 µg in patients with asthma (Tarral et al., 2005) or COPD (Aubier et al., 2005; Beier et al., 2005), whereas indacaterol doses as low as 200 µg once daily provide sustained 24-h bronchodilation (Beeh et al., 2005; Chuchalin et al., 2005; Kanniess et al., 2005).

In the guinea pig tracheal preparation, indacaterol has a fast onset of action similar that of salbutamol and formoterol. This is in contrast to the much slower onset observed with salmeterol. In the clinical situation, it is recognized that salbutamol and formoterol have fast onsets of action, whereas salmeterol has a slower onset (Wegener et al., 1992; van Noord et al., 1996). Therefore, the data generated in the tracheal preparation strongly suggest that, in a clinical setting, indacaterol will have a fast onset of action. This has been confirmed in a number of clinical studies (Beeh et al., 2005; Kanniess et al., 2005; Tarral et al., 2005). There are several potential advantages for a fast-acting inhaled ₂ adrenoceptor agonist. Because patients would experience rapid relief of symptoms, they will be confident that they have inhaled the drug properly; this could also reduce the risk of accidental over dosage through repeated dosing. In addition, a fast-acting compound has the potential to be used as rescue medication. Indeed, although formoterol and salmeterol are both approved as maintenance therapy for asthma, only formoterol has been approved as rescue medicine in the European Union (Lotvall, 2002).

Both in the in vitro preparation and in vivo in the guinea pig, the duration of action of salmeterol and salbutamol is in line with their known clinical profile. Although the duration of action of formoterol observed in both systems does not reflect the clinical situation, this discrepancy has been reported previously (Nials et al., 1993, 1994). A number of theories have been put forward to explain this inconsistency, and the most rational explanation for the observed duration of action of formoterol in human almost certainly lies within the high local concentrations achieved after inhalation and the interaction with the membrane lipid bilayer as a key component (Anderson et al., 1994). Our in vivo results would support this hypothesis, since an 18-h duration of action for this compound, in the guinea pig, is demonstrated when given at a higher dose. Although for all the compounds the relative potencies from the isolated tracheal preparation were carried over quantitatively to the in vivo guinea pig studies, this was not true for formoterol. Formoterol was approximately 10-fold more potent that the other compounds in the isolated trachea but approximately 1000-fold more potent in the in vivo guinea pig studies. This discrepancy is likely due to the physicochemical properties of the compounds and the route of delivery. In our early studies, when the compounds were given to the guinea pig by nebulization instead of dry powder, the relative potency of formoterol was much more in accord with the tissue data (i.e., approximately 10-fold more potent than indacaterol; data not shown). In line with this hypothesis, it should be noted that a similar 10-fold difference in the relative potency for formoterol over indacaterol and salmeterol was also observed in the rhesus monkey, where the compounds were given by nebulization.

In the case of indacaterol, the results obtained in both systems predict a duration of action in human of at least 24 h. Indeed, a range of studies have shown that, in patients with asthma (Beeh et al., 2005; Chuchalin et al., 2005; Kanniess et al., 2005) or COPD (Aubier et al., 2005; Beier et al., 2005), indacaterol has a 24-h duration of action on once-daily dosing. Once-daily inhaled steroids (Dent, 2002; Wardlaw et al., 2004) and once-daily inhaled muscarinic antagonists (Gross, 2004) are now available; currently marketed long-acting inhaled ₂ adrenoceptor agonists have to be given twice a day. A once-daily ₂ adrenoceptor agonist, such as indacaterol, has the potential to be given in combination with either a once-daily corticosteroid or a once-daily muscarinic antagonist or both. In addition to being more convenient to patients, this combination could also provide benefits in terms of improvements in lung function, exercise performance, and health status (Stoloff et al., 2002; Tennant et al., 2003).

Some clinical studies have noted a reduction in the bronchoprotective effect of ₂ adrenoceptor agonists with regular treatment (Larj and Bleecker, 2002). The extent of desensitization is generally accepted to be dose-dependent for a given agonist and efficacy-dependent compared with other agonists. Since our studies demonstrate that indacaterol has a higher intrinsic efficacy than salmeterol, an assessment of the desensitization potential of this compound was made. The data from this study suggest that indacaterol, formoterol, and salmeterol do not induce any desensitization following 5-day treatment in the guinea pig. These results were further confirmed with those from clinical studies in patients with asthma (Chuchalin et al., 2005) or COPD (Beier et al., 2005), in which once-daily dosing with indacaterol provides 24-h bronchodilation with no loss of efficacy after 28-day therapy.

In summary, the preclinical profile of indacaterol demonstrates that, as a single enantiomer, this compound combines a long duration of action, compatible with once-daily dosing in human, together with a fast onset of action and an improved cardiovascular safety profile.

	Acknowledgements

 
We thank D. Beer, H. Buescher, N. Davis, A. Nicholls, J. Mok, C. Docx, R. Ernst, L. Jordan, A. Steward, D. Bayley, D. Wyss, and O. Bonneau for excellent technical assistance and J. Maas and S. Herbert for formulating the compounds for the in vivo experiments.

	Footnotes

 
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://jpet.aspetjournals.org.

doi:10.1124/jpet.105.098251.

ABBREVIATIONS: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; 5-HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Alexandre Trifilieff, WSJ-386.5.10, Novartis Pharma AG, Postfach, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland. E-mail: alexandre.trifilieff{at}novartis.com

	References

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

Anderson GP, Linden A, and Rabe KF (1994) Why are long-acting beta-adrenoceptor agonists long-acting? Eur Respir J 7: 569-578.[Abstract]

Aubier M, Duval X, Knight H, Perry S, Majumdar T, Kaiser G, Wood J, and Brookman L (2005) Indacaterol, a novel once-daily 2-agonist, is effective and well tolerated on multiple dosing in patients with mild-to-moderate COPD. Eur Respir J 26: 287s.

Beeh K-M, Schelfout V, Gronke L, Kaniess F, Cameron R, and van As A (2005) QAB149: the first once-daily beta2 agonist with 24-hour bronchodilatation. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2: A356.

Beier J, Jack D, Bao W, and Higgins M (2005) Safety of multiple-dose indacaterol, a novel once-daily 2-agonist, in moderate to severe COPD. Eur Respir J 26: 295s.

Bennett JA, Smyth ET, Pavord ID, Wilding PJ, and Tattersfield AE (1994) Systemic effects of salbutamol and salmeterol in patients with asthma. Thorax 49: 771-774.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cheng Y and Prusoff WH (1973) Relationship between the inhibition constant (K_i) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 percent inhibition (IC₅₀) of an enzymatic reaction. Biochem Pharmacol 22: 3099-3108.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chong BTY, Agrawal DK, Romero FA, and Townley RG (1998) Measurement of bronchoconstriction using whole-body plethysmograph: comparison of freely moving versus restrained guinea pigs. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 39: 163-168.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chuchalin AG, Tsoi AN, Richter K, Arievich H, Cameron R, and van As A (2005) Cardiovascular safety of QAB149, a novel 24-hour beta2-agonist, in patients with stable asthma. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2: A356.

Coleman RA and Nials AT (1989) Novel and versatile superfusion system. Its use in the evaluation of some spasmogenic and spasmolytic agents using guinea-pig isolated tracheal smooth muscle. J Pharmacol Methods 21: 71-86.[CrossRef][Medline]

Dent G (2002) Ciclesonide (Byk Gulden). Curr Opin Investig Drugs 3: 78-83.[Medline]

Fozard JR and Buescher H (2001) Comparison of the anti-bronchoconstrictor activities of inhaled formoterol, its (R,R)- and (S,S)-enantiomers and salmeterol in the rhesus monkey. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 14: 289-295.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gauthier C, Langin D, and Balligand JL (2000) Beta3-adrenoceptors in the cardiovascular system. Trends Pharmacol Sci 21: 426-431.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gross NJ (2004) Tiotropium bromide. Chest 126: 1946-1953.[Medline]

Guhan AR, Cooper S, Oborne J, Lewis S, Bennett J, and Tattersfield AE (2000) Systemic effects of formoterol and salmeterol: a dose-response comparison in healthy subjects. Thorax 55: 650-656.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kalra S, Swystun VA, Bhagat R, and Cockcroft DW (1996) Inhaled corticosteroids do not prevent the development of tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol. Chest 109: 953-956.[Medline]

Kanniess F, Cameron R, Owen R, and Higgins M (2005) Indacaterol, a novel once-daily 2-agonist, demonstrates 24-hours efficacy and is well tolerated in patients with persistent asthma: a multiple-dose, dose-ranging study. Eur Respir J 26: 253s.

Larj MJ and Bleecker ER (2002) Effects of beta 2-agonists on airway tone and bronchial responsiveness. J Allergy Clin Immunol 110: S304-S312.[CrossRef][Medline]

Levine MA and Leenen FH (1989) Role of beta 1-receptors and vagal tone in cardiac inotropic and chronotropic responses to a beta 2-agonist in humans. Circulation 79: 107-115.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lipworth BJ and Grove A (1997) Evaluation of partial beta-adrenoceptor agonist activity. Br J Clin Pharmacol 43: 9-14.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lotvall J (2002) The long and short of beta 2-agonists. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 15: 497-501.[CrossRef][Medline]

Molimard M, Naline E, Zhang Y, Le Gross V, Begaud B, and Advenier C (1998) Long- and short-acting beta 2 adrenoceptor agonists: interactions in human contracted bronchi. Eur Respir J 11: 583-588.[Abstract]

Motomura S, Reinhard-Zerkowski H, Daul A, and Brodde OE (1990) On the physiologic role of beta-2 adrenoceptors in the human heart: in vitro and in vivo studies. Am Heart J 119: 608-619.[CrossRef][Medline]

Naline E, Molimard M, Fairhurst R, Trifilieff A, and Advenier C (2005) Pharmacological characterisation of QAB149, a novel 24-hour beta2-agonist, on the isolated human bronchus. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2: A356.

Nials AT, Ball DI, Butchers PR, Coleman RA, Humbles AA, Johnson M, and Vardey CJ (1994) Formoterol on airway smooth muscle and human lung mast cells: a comparison with salbutamol and salmeterol. Eur J Pharmacol 251: 127-135.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nials AT, Coleman RA, Johnson M, Magnussen H, Rabe KF, and Vardey CJ (1993) Effects of beta-adrenoceptor agonists in human bronchial smooth muscle. Br J Pharmacol 110: 1112-1116.[Medline]

Philipson LH (2002) beta-Agonists and metabolism. J Allergy Clin Immunol 110: S313-S317.[CrossRef][Medline]

Rabe KF (2001) Formoterol in clinical practice-safety issues. Respir Med 95 (Suppl B): S21-S25.[Medline]

Sarria B, Naline E, Zhang Y, Cortijo J, Molimard M, Moreau J, Therond P, Advenier C, and Morcillo EJ (2002) Muscarinic M2 receptors in acetylcholine-isoproterenol functional antagonism in human isolated bronchus. Am J Physiol 283: L1125-L1132.

Sovani MP, Whale CI, and Tattersfield AE (2004) A benefit-risk assessment of inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists in the management of obstructive pulmonary disease. Drug Saf 27: 689-715.[CrossRef][Medline]

Stoloff S, Poinsett-Holmes K, and Dorinsky PM (2002) Combination therapy with inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids: a paradigm shift in asthma management. Pharmacotherapy 22: 212-226.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sutherland ER (2004) Outpatient treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: comparisons with asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 114: 715-724.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tarral A, Fauchoux N, Knight H, Perry S, Majumdar T, Kaiser G, Wood J, and Brookman L (2005) Safety and tolerability of multiple-dose indacaterol, a novel once-daily 2-agonist, in patients with mild asthma. Eur Respir J 26: 253s.

Tennant RC, Erin EM, Barnes PJ, and Hansel TT (2003) Long-acting beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists or tiotropium bromide for patients with COPD: is combination therapy justified? Curr Opin Pharmacol 3: 270-276.[CrossRef][Medline]

van Noord JA, Smeets JJ, Raaijmakers JA, Bommer AM, and Maesen FP (1996) Salmeterol versus formoterol in patients with moderately severe asthma: onset and duration of action. Eur Respir J 9: 1684-1688.[Abstract]

Wardlaw A, Larivee P, Eller J, Cockcroft DW, Ghaly L, and Harris AG (2004) Efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler vs fluticasone propionate metered-dose inhaler in asthma subjects previously using fluticasone propionate. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 93: 49-55.[Medline]

Wegener T, Hedenstrom H, and Melander B (1992) Rapid onset of action of inhaled formoterol in asthmatic patients. Chest 102: 535-538.[CrossRef][Medline]

White M and Sander N (1999) Asthma from the perspective of the patient. J Allergy Clin Immunol 104: 47-52.

Ying Y, Leung KM, Berkbigler D, Halbert RJ, and Legorreta AP (1999) Compliance with US asthma management guidelines and specialty care: a regional variation or national concern? J Eval Clin Pract 5: 213-221.[CrossRef][Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. G. Sturton, A. Trifilieff, A. G. Nicholson, and P. J. Barnes Pharmacological Characterization of Indacaterol, a Novel Once Daily Inhaled 2 Adrenoceptor Agonist, on Small Airways in Human and Rat Precision-Cut Lung Slices J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2008; 324(1): 270 - 275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Beeh, E. Derom, F. Kanniess, R. Cameron, M. Higgins, and A. van As Indacaterol, a novel inhaled {beta}2-agonist, provides sustained 24-h bronchodilation in asthma Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2007; 29(5): 871 - 878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Naline, A. Trifilieff, R. A. Fairhurst, C. Advenier, and M. Molimard Effect of indacaterol, a novel long-acting {beta}2-agonist, on isolated human bronchi Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2007; 29(3): 575 - 581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jpet.105.098251v1 317/2/762    most recent Submit a response View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Battram, C. Articles by Trifilieff, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Battram, C. Articles by Trifilieff, A.