JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics Fast Forward
First published on January 6, 2006; DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.096701


0022-3565/06/3171-369-377$20.00
JPET 317:369-377, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.105.096701v1
317/1/369    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Petroski, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Foster, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Petroski, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Foster, A. C.

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY

Indiplon Is a High-Affinity Positive Allosteric Modulator with Selectivity for {alpha}1 Subunit-Containing GABAA Receptors

Robert E. Petroski, Jordan E. Pomeroy, Ronnie Das, Heath Bowman, Weidong Yang, Adele P. Chen, and Alan C. Foster

Departments of Neuroscience (R.E.P., J.E.P., R.D., H.B., A.P.C., A.C.F.) and Molecular Biology (W.Y.), Neurocrine Biosciences Inc., San Diego, California

Received for publication October 6, 2005
Accepted January 5, 2006.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Indiplon (NBI 34060) is a novel pyrazolopyrimidine currently in development for the treatment of insomnia. We have previously shown that indiplon exhibits high-affinity binding to native GABAA receptors from rat brain and acts as a positive allosteric modulator of GABAA receptor currents in cultured rat neurons (Sullivan et al., 2004Go). In this study, we examined the GABAA receptor {alpha} subunit selectivity of indiplon using electrophysiological techniques to record GABA-activated chloride currents from recombinant rodent GABAA receptors expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Indiplon potentiated the GABA-activated chloride current in recombinant GABAA receptors in a dose-dependent and reversible manner and was approximately 10-fold selective for {alpha}1 subunit-containing receptors over GABAA receptors containing {alpha}2, {alpha}3, or {alpha}5 subunits. The EC50 values were 2.6, 24, 60, and 77 nM for {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2, {alpha}2beta2{gamma}2, {alpha}3beta3{gamma}2, and {alpha}5beta2{gamma}2 receptors, respectively. Indiplon was approximately 10 times more potent than zolpidem and zopiclone and >100 times more potent than zaleplon. Moreover, indiplon, up to 1 µM, did not potentiate GABAA receptors composed of {alpha}4beta2{gamma}2 and {alpha}6beta2{gamma}2 subunits. This mechanism of action is proposed to underlie the sedative-hypnotic effects of indiplon in animals and humans.


GABA is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the mammalian central nervous system (Macdonald and Olsen, 1994Go). Drugs that enhance inhibitory neurotransmission include benzodiazepines, barbiturates, and general anesthetics and are used therapeutically as sedative-hypnotics, anxiolytics, antiepileptics, muscle relaxants, and anesthetics. These drugs target the GABAA receptor, an ion channel that selectively passes chloride when gated by the binding of GABA. Chloride influx serves to hyperpolarize or stabilize a negative resting membrane potential, making the neuron resistant to excitation.

The GABAA receptor is a hetero-oligomeric complex composed of five transmembrane spanning subunits from sixteen different genes, {alpha}(1–6), beta(1–3), {gamma}(1–3), {delta}, {epsilon}, {pi}, and {theta} (Barnard et al., 1998Go; Korpi et al., 2002Go; Whiting, 2003Go). In most neurons, two {alpha} subunits, two beta subunits, and one {gamma} subunit form the typical GABAA receptor (Chang et al., 1996Go; Tretter et al., 1997Go). The {delta}, {epsilon}, {pi}, and {theta} subunits have some reported selective functions but are not yet fully understood. Theoretically, there are thousands of possible subunit combinations, but a limited number of subtype combinations have been found in native systems with {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2, {alpha}2beta3{gamma}2, and {alpha}3beta3{gamma}2 being the most abundant (Whiting, 2003Go). The assembly of {alpha}, beta, and {gamma} subunits is required to produce functional GABAA receptors that exhibit all of the pharmacological properties of native GABAA receptors. Benzodiazepine binding occurs at the interface between {alpha} and {gamma}2 subunits (Wieland et al., 1992Go). GABA elicits chloride currents in recombinant GABAA receptors composed of only {alpha} and beta subunits, but these currents are not potentiated by benzodiazepines (Schofield et al., 1987Go).

The diversity of subunits and their heterogeneous distribution between brain regions provokes the question of whether GABAA receptors composed of different subunit combinations play different functional roles in the brain. GABAA receptors containing {alpha}1, {alpha}2, {alpha}3, or {alpha}5 subunits in combination with beta{gamma} subunits bind to and are potentiated by benzodiazepines. In contrast, {alpha}4 or {alpha}6 subunit-containing receptors are insensitive to the classic benzodiazepines like diazepam (with the exceptions of the antagonist Ro15-1788 (flumazenil) and the inverse agonist Ro15-4513 [ethyl 8-azido-6-dihydro-5-methyl-6-oxo-4H-imidazo[1,5-a]-[1,4]benzodiazepine-3-carboxylate], which show weaker agonist activity at {alpha}4 and {alpha}6). Genetically engineered mice have been generated in which a single histidine (His) to arginine (Arg) mutation has been introduced for individual {alpha} subunits that render them insensitive to diazepam, whereas GABAA receptor expression and GABA-evoked responses are normal (Mohler et al., 2002Go). These mouse lines have been used to explore the physiological roles of GABAA receptor {alpha} subunits in vivo. GABAA receptors containing {alpha}1 subunits play a role in sedation, as the {alpha}1 (H101R) mutant mice are resistant to the sedative effects of diazepam (Rudolph et al., 1999Go; Low et al., 2000Go; McKernan et al., 2000Go) and zolpidem (Crestani et al., 2000Go). GABAA receptors containing {alpha}2 subunits play a role in anxiety, as the {alpha}2 (H101R) mutant mice are resistant to the anxiolytic effects of diazepam (Low et al., 2000Go). The role of {alpha}3 subunit-containing GABAA receptors is unclear, because the {alpha}3 (H126R) mutant mice do not show any missing diazepam responses (Low et al., 2000Go). The restricted expression of GABAA receptors containing {alpha}5 subunits to the hippocampus suggests that they may play a role in learning and memory. This is supported by the {alpha}5 (H105R) mutant mice, which exhibit enhanced learning and memory (Collinson et al., 2002Go).

For the treatment of insomnia, zolpidem (Ambien) is currently the market leader, representing the class of so-called "nonbenzodiazepines" that also include the marketed drugs zopiclone (Imovane), eszopiclone (Lunesta), and zaleplon (Sonata). The advantages of zolpidem over the earlier benzodiazepine sedative-hypnotics, such as triazolam (Halcion), are a short duration of action with reduced residual sedation upon waking and fewer cognitive and psychomotor side effects (Mitler, 2000Go). In terms of GABAA receptor pharmacology, zolpidem binds to the benzodiazepine site and acts as a positive allosteric modulator. Interestingly, zolpidem has highest affinity for GABAA receptors containing {alpha}1 subunits, a feature that has been proposed to underlie its improved properties as a sedative-hypnotic drug (Sanger, 2004Go).

Indiplon (NBI 34060) is a novel pyrazolopyrimidine exhibiting high affinity for the benzodiazepine site on GABAA receptors currently being developed for the treatment of insomnia (Sullivan et al., 2004Go). The present study was carried out to determine the mechanism of action of indiplon on both native and recombinant GABAA receptors using an electrophysiological assay to measure functional chloride currents. In addition, we evaluated the {alpha} subunit selectivity by testing indiplon on each of the six {alpha} subunits ({alpha}1-{alpha}6) in combination with beta2{gamma}2 (or beta3{gamma}2) subunits. Finally, the activity of indiplon on native and recombinant GABAA receptors was compared with the sedative-hypnotics zolpidem, zopiclone, and zaleplon.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Neuronal Cell Culture. Neuronal cultures were prepared from neonatal rats. Cerebral cortices from one rat were removed under a dissecting microscope and cut into small pieces (~0.5 mm2). The tissue was digested in papain/DNAase (Papain Dissociation System; Worthington Biochemical Corp., Lakewood, NJ) for 45 min at 37°. The pieces were then triturated through a 5-ml serological pipette five to 10 times until the solution became cloudy. The dispersed cells were counted on a hemacytometer and plated at very low density (2000 cells per well) onto pre-existing monolayers of astrocytes growing on 12-mm diameter glass coverslips in serum-free basal medium Eagle (BME) containing B27 supplements (Gibco, Grand Island, NY). On the 4th day, 5'-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (10 µM) was added to prevent proliferation of non-neuronal cells. Cells were typically used for electrophysiological experiments at 7 to 14 days in vitro.

Astrocyte cultures were prepared from the same cell dissociate described above. The remaining cells were plated into a T-25 tissue culture flask in astrocyte medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/F12 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum). After approximately 1 week, a monolayer of type 1 astrocytes was established. At this time, cytosine arabinoside (10 µM) was added to kill rapidly dividing microglial cells and fibroblasts. After 3 days, the flask was shaken overnight at 200 rpm to dislodge the contaminating top cells. The next day, the medium was replaced and the flask contained a nearly pure population of type 1 astrocytes. These cells were removed from the flask by shaking for 2 to 5 min in trypsin/EDTA. The cells were pelleted and resuspended in astrocyte medium and counted using a hemacytometer. The astrocytes (10,000 cells in 0.5-ml media) were plated onto poly-D-lysine/collagen-coated cover-slips (12 mm diameter) in 24-well tissue culture trays. After approximately 1 week, the astrocytes formed confluent monolayers. On the day neurons were plated onto the glial monolayers, the astrocytes medium was replaced with serum-free BME/B27.

Expression of Recombinant GABAA Receptors. Recombinant GABAA receptors were transiently expressed in HEK293 cells as heterotrimeric combinations of {alpha}, beta, and {gamma} subunits. In this study, {alpha} subunit selectivity was examined by combining rat {alpha}1, {alpha}2, {alpha}4, {alpha}5, or {alpha}6 subunit with rat beta2 and mouse {gamma}2S. All receptor subunits were subcloned into the mammalian expression vector pcDNA3. HEK293 cells were transiently transfected using the Effectene transfection kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) using a ratio of 1:1:1 for {alpha}, beta, and {gamma} subunit DNA. Green fluorescent protein was coexpressed to identify positively transfected cells. Electrophysiological recordings were conducted 48 to 72 h after transfection on cells exhibiting green fluorescence. We did not see chloride currents from cells expressing the {alpha}3/beta2/{gamma}2S combination. However, we did record chloride currents when {alpha}3 was expressed in combination with rat beta3 and mouse {gamma}2S. Therefore, this combination was used to characterize the response of {alpha}3 subunit-containing GABAA receptors. Although beta subunits affect the binding of GABA and other ligands, they have been shown to not influence the affinity of benzodiazepine site ligands (Hadingham et al., 1993Go; Graham et al., 1996Go).

Electrophysiological Recording of GABA Currents. Coverslips, upon which cells had been plated, were transferred to the recording chamber on an inverted microscope (Olympus IX70) and continuously perfused (1.5–2 ml/min) with external recording solution at room temperature. The composition of the external solution was 140 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 2.5 CaCl2, 1.3 mM MgCl2, 10 mM glucose, and 10 mM HEPES, and the pH was 7.3. For neuronal recordings, the external was supplemented with 0.3 µM tetrodotoxin to block sodium currents and 10 µM NBQX to block AMPA receptor currents. The composition of the internal solution in the recording pipette was 125 mM CsCl, 10 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 5 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM CaCl2, 10 mM HEPES, and the pH was 7.3.

A Multiclamp 700A patch-clamp amplifier and pClamp 9 software (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA) were used for electrophysiological recording. After gigaohm seals were formed between the patch electrodes (approximate resistance range: 1–3 M{Omega}) and the cell, the whole-cell patch-clamp configuration was established by rupturing the membrane across the electrode tip. If the quality of the seal was judged to be poor, the electrode was replaced and the process was repeated with a different cell. Once a stable configuration had been achieved, recording was started in voltage-clamp mode, with the cell initially clamped at –70 mV.

GABA (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was prepared as a 100 mM stock in water, and from this, a 300 µM working stock was prepared. Small aliquots were dispensed and stored at –20°, so that any given working stock was not subject to repeated freeze-thaw cycles. On each recording day, a fresh GABA test solution was prepared in external solution.

For dose-response curves, GABA was applied for 2 s to elicit an inward chloride current. GABA solutions (10 nM to 1 mM) were fed by gravity into an 8-to-1 micromanifold (Warner) with the outlet (PE-10 tubing) positioned near the cell. Solution exchange occurred in <50 ms. Cells were washed with external solution for 60 s between GABA applications to allow receptors to recover from desensitization.

To study the effects of positive allosteric modulators, GABA currents were repeatedly elicited by puffer application of 3 µM GABA every 12 s, and test substances were applied by bath perfusion. A pressurized (10 p.s.i.) puffer pipette (~2 µm tip diameter) was positioned near the recorded cell, and GABA (3 µM) was applied by opening a computer-controlled solenoid valve (50–100 ms). This activated a peak inward current (200–2000 pA) that rapidly decayed. Because the small volume of GABA released from the puffer pipette was rapidly diluted in the external bath, the neurons were exposed to a maximum concentration of ≤3 µM GABA. This is less than the EC50 of GABA for native and cloned GABAA receptors (Fig. 2) and provided a reliable starting point to measure potentiation of the current by positive allosteric modulators. Drugs were applied for 3 min (15 evoked GABA currents), which was sufficient for an equilibrium response to be established. Drugs were washed out for at least 3 min. If the GABA current recovered to predrug control amplitude, a higher concentration of drug was applied. We found that when cells were treated with drugs that potentiated the GABA current by ≥2-fold, the potentiation by subsequent drug treatments was diminished relative to treatment with the same concentration of drugs to naive cells (never exposed to drugs). This was not due to rundown of the current, because the amplitude of the GABA-activated current was unchanged. We ended the experiment as soon as a concentration of drug was used that potentiated the GABA current by ≥2-fold. Therefore, full dose-response curves were not run on each cell, since this would result in an underestimation of the potentiation produced by higher concentrations. Each drug concentration was tested on four to 20 different cells. We recorded from 203 cultured neurons and 399 HEK293 cells from 31 transfections.


Figure 2
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Dose responses of GABA at native and cloned GABAA receptors. GABA was locally applied for 2 s to cultured neurons (native receptors) or HEK293 cells transiently transfected with cloned receptor subunits to elicit an inward chloride current. GABA was washed out for 60 s before applying the next higher concentration. The peak current was normalized to the maximum GABA-activated current, and symbols represent the average response ± S.E.M. for six to 15 cells.

 
Indiplon and zaleplon were synthesized in-house. Zolpidem and zopiclone were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and Tocris Cookson Inc. (Ellisville, MO), respectively. Drugs were prepared as 10 or 100 mM DMSO stocks and stored at –20°. Small aliquots were dispensed so that any given stock was not subject to repeated freeze-thaw cycles. DMSO stocks were serially diluted into external recording buffer to the appropriate test concentrations. The highest concentration of DMSO used was 0.1%, and this was found to not affect GABA currents. Structures are shown in Fig. 1.


Figure 1
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Structures of indiplon, zolpidem, zopiclone, and zaleplon.

 
Data Analysis. The GABA current was quantified as the area under the curve (AUC). This reflected the total charge transfer in response to GABA. The effect of test compounds on the GABA current was measured at the end of the 3-min drug application (average of three to five AUC measurements) and normalized to the GABA current measured in the predrug baseline (average of three to five AUC measurements). The dose-response curves were generated from population data from four to 20 different cells at each concentration for each drug and not from individual dose-response experiments. Thus, the population data were fitted to a single sigmoid function (SigmaPlot version 9; Logistic 4 parameter) resulting in one EC50 (the concentration of drug that elicited a half-maximal response), Emax (the maximum effect), and Hill slope (nH) with no error values].

Formula(1)


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
GABAA Receptor Dose Responses. For GABA dose-response curves, GABA (10 nM to 1 mM) was locally applied for 2 s to elicit an inward chloride current. Peak GABA currents were normalized to the maximum response elicited by 1 mM GABA, and dose-response curves were fitted to a Logistic function (Fig. 2). The EC50 of GABA on native and cloned GABAA receptors was around 10 µM: neurons (6.4 µM), {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2s (13.4 µM), {alpha}2beta2{gamma}2s (12.2 µM), {alpha}3beta3{gamma}2s (45.7 µM), and {alpha}5beta2{gamma}2s (10.2 µM). The lower affinity for {alpha}3 subunit-containing receptors has been previously reported (Bohme et al., 2004Go).

Drug Effects on Native GABAA Receptors. Puffer application of 3 µM GABA elicited an inward current in cultured neurons (Fig. 3). We chose this concentration, because it was below the EC50 (6.4 µM; Fig. 1) yet elicited a robust current that could be potentiated. The brief application of GABA (50–100 ms) used in our protocol minimized the desensitization of the GABA current that occurs during longer applications (5–10 s). Because the GABA current was repeatedly measured, the effect of test compounds could be normalized to the control current immediately before application of the test compound and the recovery of the GABA current could be readily determined after washout. Bath application of indiplon rapidly potentiated the inward current activated by 3 µM GABA, and this effect was readily reversed upon washout (Fig. 3). Indiplon did not activate a current in the absence of puffer applied GABA, indicating that it is a positive allosteric modulator rather than a direct agonist at GABAA receptors.


Figure 3
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Indiplon potentiates chloride currents from native GABAA receptors. A neuron was voltage clamped at –70 mV, and puffer applications of 3 µM GABA (every 12 s) were used to activate inward currents (seen as downward deflections). A, concatenated display of GABA-activated currents (one of every five traces shown) before, during, and after a 3-min bath application of indiplon (10 nM and 1 µM; indicated by gray bars). Each current trace is 5-s long, but the time between current traces is 1 min. Indiplon dose-dependently and reversibly potentiated the GABA-activated currents. B, close-up of three superimposed GABAA receptor current traces: 1) control, 2) 10 nM indiplon, and 3) 1 µM indiplon.

 
The potentiation of native GABAA receptor currents by indiplon was compared with zolpidem, zopiclone, and zaleplon. The concentration-response curves are shown in Fig. 4, and the EC50, Emax, and Hill slope values are summarized in Table 1. Indiplon was the most potent of all of the compounds tested with EC50 of 15.8 nM. Indiplon was approximately 10-fold more potent than zolpidem (EC50 121 nM) and zopiclone (206 nM) and over 100-fold more potent than zaleplon (2659 nM). The maximal potentiation was not significantly different for the four compounds (one-way ANOVA).


Figure 4
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Concentration-response curves for indiplon, zolpidem, zopiclone, and zaleplon on GABA-activated chloride currents from cultured neocortical neurons. The data points represent the average ± S.E.M. potentiation from four to nine different cells for each concentration for each drug. The population data were fitted to a single sigmoid function (Logistic 4 parameter).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1 Summary of EC50, Emax, and Hill slope values

Below is a comparison of indiplon, zolpidem, zopiclone, and zaleplon on the potentiation of GABA-evoked chloride currents from native (cultured neurons) and recombinant GABAA receptors. The data points represent the average ± S.E.M. potentiation from four to 20 different cells for each concentration for each drug. The population data was fitted to a single sigmoid function (Logistic 4 parameter).

 

Drug Effects on Recombinant GABAA Receptors. Puffer application of 3 µM GABA also elicited an inward current in HEK293 cells expressing recombinant GABAA receptors composed of {alpha}, beta, and {gamma} subunits. Representative GABA-activated chloride currents from {alpha}1/beta2/{gamma}2S receptors are shown in Fig. 5. As in the neuronal recordings, bath application of indiplon rapidly and reversibly potentiated the inward current activated by 3 µM GABA but did not directly activate the GABAA receptor current, indicating that it is a positive allosteric modulator rather than an agonist.


Figure 5
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Indiplon potentiates chloride currents from recombinant GABAA receptors. An HEK293 cell expressing {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2 GABAA receptor subunits was voltage-clamped at –70 mV, and puffer applications of 3 µM GABA (every 12 s) were used to activate inward currents (seen as downward deflections). A, concatenated display of GABA-activated currents (one of every five traces shown) before, during, and after a 3-min bath application of indiplon (1 nM and 100 nM; indicated by gray bars). Each current trace is 5-s long, but the time between current traces is 1 min. Indiplon dose-dependently and reversibly potentiated the GABA-activated currents. B, close-up of three superimposed GABAA receptor current traces: 1) control, 2) 1 nM indiplon, and 3) 100 nM indiplon.

 

We tested the {alpha} subunit selectivity of indiplon by expressing each {alpha} subunit (one to six) in combination with beta2{gamma}2. We were not able to record chloride currents from the {alpha}3beta2{gamma}2 combination but did obtain functional currents from {alpha}3beta3{gamma}2; consequently, this combination was used to test for activity at {alpha}3 subunit-containing GABAA receptors. Indiplon potentiated {alpha}1 subunit-, {alpha}2 subunit-, {alpha}3 subunit-, and {alpha}5 subunit-containing GABAA receptors but had no effect on {alpha}4 subunit and {alpha}6 subunit-containing GABAA receptors at concentrations up to 1 µM (data not shown).

Concentration-response curves showed that indiplon more potently potentiated {alpha}1 subunit-containing GABAA receptors (EC50 of 2.6 nM) than {alpha}2 subunit- (24 nM), {alpha}3 subunit- (60 nM), or {alpha}5 subunit-containing (77 nM) GABAA receptors (Fig. 6 and Table 1). Thus, indiplon showed at least 10-fold selectivity for {alpha}1 subunit-containing GABAA receptors compared with the other {alpha} subunits. The maximal potentiation of GABA currents from recombinant receptors was approximately 250%, with the exception of {alpha}2beta2{gamma}2 in which Emax was 398% (Table 1).


Figure 6
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Concentration-response curves for indiplon, zolpidem, zopiclone, and zaleplon on {alpha}1 subunit-, {alpha}2 subunit-, {alpha}3 subunit-, and {alpha}5 subunit-containing recombinant GABAA receptors. The data points represent the average ± S.E.M. potentiation from four to 20 different cells for each concentration for each drug. The population data were fitted to a single sigmoid function (Logistic 4 parameter).

 
Concentration-response curves were also generated for zolpidem, zopiclone, and zaleplon (Fig. 6). The EC50, Emax, and Hill slope values are summarized in Table 1. Although zolpidem showed approximately 5-fold selectivity for {alpha}1 subunit-containing GABAA receptors, it was much less potent (>10-fold) than indiplon (70 nM versus 2.6 nM) on {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2 receptors. Zolpidem was also weaker (>10-fold) than indiplon on {alpha}2 subunit- (349 versus 24 nM) and {alpha}3 subunit-containing (831 versus 60 nM) GABAA receptors. However, zolpidem differed from indiplon in that it had no detectable activity on {alpha}5beta2{gamma}2 receptors up to a concentration of 10 µM.

Zopiclone was also weaker than indiplon against all recombinant GABAA receptors. It exhibited preference for {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2 (158 nM) and {alpha}5beta2{gamma}2 (146 nM) receptors compared with {alpha}2beta2{gamma}2 (598 nM) and {alpha}3beta3{gamma}2 (1187 nM) receptors.

As in recordings from neuronal GABAA receptors, zaleplon was the weakest compound tested and showed only marginal selectivity for the various {alpha} subunit-containing receptors: {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2 (499 nM), {alpha}2beta2{gamma}2 (1098 nM), and {alpha}3beta3{gamma}2 (1514 nM). It exhibited much less activity at {alpha}5beta3{gamma}2. Maximal efficacy was not obtained by 10 µM, the highest concentration tested, and we estimated the EC50 to be >3 µM.

Interestingly, the EC50 values for indiplon, zolpidem, and zopiclone on native GABAA receptors fell in between the EC50 values for {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2 and {alpha}2beta2{gamma}2 (Table 1). These results are compatible, because the native GABAA receptors in the neocortex are thought to be primarily composed of {alpha}1- and {alpha}2 subunit-containing subtypes (Fritschy and Mohler, 1995Go). Zaleplon was found to be slightly less active at native GABAA receptors than either {alpha}1 subunit- or {alpha}2 subunit-containing recombinant receptors.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The present studies represent a comprehensive comparison of "nonbenzodiazepine" drugs at GABAA receptor subtypes. Indiplon was shown to be a positive allosteric modulator of GABAA receptors; it potentiated the chloride current evoked by subsaturating concentrations of GABA (3 µM) but did not directly gate the channel. Indiplon dose-dependently potentiated GABA currents from native (neuronal) as well as recombinant GABAA receptors.

Indiplon was approximately 10 times more potent than zolpidem and zopiclone and over 100 times more potent than zaleplon on native GABAA receptors from neocortical neurons and exhibited a similar advantage in potency against recombinant GABAA receptor combinations (Table 2). This rank order agrees with our previously reported binding data (Sullivan et al., 2004Go). All compounds potentiated native GABAA receptor currents by 200 to 300%. The Emax of indiplon was not statistically different from zolpidem, zopiclone, and zaleplon (one-way ANOVA). However, the Emax values varied more for cloned GABAA receptors ranging from 242 to 553%. The greater variability in Emax values for recombinant GABAA receptors is likely due to differences in subunit expression between batches of transiently transfected cells.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2 Relative potency of indiplon zolpidem, zopiclone, and zaleplon

EC50 values were normalized to indiplon. Zolpidem (up to 10 µM) did not potentiate {alpha}5beta2{gamma}2 receptors, so relative potency was not calculated. The EC50 for zaleplon at {alpha}5beta2{gamma}2 receptors could not be determined since the maximum potentiation was not achieved at 10 µM, the highest concentration tested. We estimated the EC50 to be >3 µM and therefore >30-fold less potent than indiplon.

 

Binding studies have shown that zolpidem is approximately 5- to 10-fold more selective for {alpha}1 subunit-containing receptors than {alpha}2 and {alpha}3 subunit-containing receptors and has no detectable affinity for {alpha}5 subunit-containing receptors (Langer et al., 1992Go; Hadingham et al., 1993Go; Damgen and Luddens, 1999Go). This was confirmed by our electrophysiology results in which we found zolpidem to be 5.0- and 11.9-fold selective for {alpha}1 over {alpha}2 and {alpha}3 subunits, respectively. In contrast, indiplon exhibited even greater selectivity for {alpha}1 over {alpha}2 and {alpha}3 subunits with 9.3- and 23.5-fold selectivity, respectively.

There are only limited reports addressing the {alpha} subunit selectivity of zopiclone and zaleplon. Zopiclone was slightly selective (≤5-fold) for binding to {alpha}1 and {alpha}5 over {alpha}3 subunit-containing receptors (combined with beta2{gamma}2 subunits) with Ki values of 66.7, 52.7, and 262 nM, respectively (Graham et al., 1996Go). However, another report showed little subunit selectivity for zopiclone and reported mixed affinities for zaleplon on {alpha} subunits depending upon which {gamma} subunits they were combined with (Damgen and Luddens, 1999Go). Electrophysiological recordings were used to determine the Kd of (R,S)-zopiclone from kinetics (Kd = koff/kon) using a single concentration of zopiclone (20 µM) (Fleck, 2002Go). The Kd values are near-perfect matches for our EC50 values: {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2 (0.2 versus 0.157 µM), {alpha}2beta2{gamma}2 (0.6 versus 0.598 µM), and {alpha}3beta2{gamma}2 (1.4 versus 1.2 µM). Our electrophysiological data on zolpidem and zaleplon or rat receptors are also in very close agreement with results reported for human GABAA receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes (Sanna et al., 2002Go).

GABAA receptors containing {alpha}1 subunits have been shown to mediate the sedative effects of diazepam (Rudolph et al., 1999Go; Low et al., 2000Go; McKernan et al., 2000Go) and zolpidem (Crestani et al., 2000Go). Indiplon was selective for {alpha}1 subunit-containing receptors (Table 3), and the degree of selectivity for {alpha}1 subunit-containing receptors over {alpha}2 and {alpha}3 subunit-containing receptors was even greater than zolpidem, an effective sedative-hypnotic whose {alpha}1 selectivity is thought to contribute to its therapeutic efficacy (Sanger, 2004Go). Unlike zolpidem, which showed no detectable activity at {alpha}5 subunit-containing receptors, indiplon did potentiate {alpha}5beta2{gamma}2 receptors, albeit at 30 times the concentration required to potentiate {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2 receptors. Indiplon has been demonstrated to exhibit sedative effects in rats that were blocked by the benzodiazepine site antagonist flumazenil (Foster et al., 2004Go). It is likely that the sedative actions of indiplon are mediated by its activity at {alpha}1 subunit-containing GABA receptors. Moreover, the sedative effects of indiplon in mice were achieved at a lower dose (ED50 2.7 mg/kg p.o.) than zolpidem (ED50 6.1 mg/kg p.o.) or zaleplon (ED50 24.6 mg/kg p.o.) (Foster et al., 2004Go). This rank order in vivo nicely matches the rank order for these compounds on native and recombinant GABAA receptors in vitro reported in this study.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3 {alpha} Subunit selectivity of indiplon, zolpidem, zopiclone, and zaleplon

EC50 values were normalized to the EC50 at recombinant {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2 receptors. Zolpidem (up to 10 µM) did not potentiate {alpha}5beta2{gamma}2 receptors, so relative selectivity was not calculated. The EC50 for zaleplon at {alpha}5beta2{gamma}2 receptors could not be determined since the maximum potentiation was not achieved at 10 µM, the highest concentration tested. We estimated the EC50 to be >3 µM and therefore >6-fold less active than at {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2 receptors.

 

The selectivity of a positive allosteric modulator for GABAA receptor subtypes containing different {alpha} subunits may influence its profile as a sedative-hypnotic. Behavioral sedation in mice induced by benzodiazepine and nonbenzodiazepine drugs is clearly due to enhanced GABA neurotransmission mediated by {alpha}1 subunit-containing GABAA receptors (Rudolph et al., 1999Go; Crestani et al., 2000Go; McKernan et al., 2000Go; Kralic et al., 2002Go; Blednov et al., 2003Go). GABAA receptors containing {alpha}5 subunits have received much attention in terms of their involvement in memory processes because of their localization and proposed physiological role in the hippocampus (Crestani et al., 2002Go). At the same time, evidence for an involvement of {alpha}1 subunit-containing GABAA receptors in memory comes from observations that the effects of diazepam on passive avoidance in mice is absent in the {alpha}1 (H101R) knock-in mice (Rudolph et al., 1999Go). If {alpha}5 subunit-containing GABAA receptors played a dominant role in the amnesic effects of benzodiazepine site ligands, then one would expect that zolpidem, which has no measurable affinity for this subtype, would be free of amnesic effects. This is not the case, since clinical studies have reported retrograde amnesia with zolpidem (Roehrs et al., 1994Go) and animal studies clearly show an effect of zolpidem on passive avoidance in the mouse (Foster et al., 2004Go). It seems reasonable to propose that the amnesic effects of hypnotics are inseparable from the hypnosis they produce, which in the case of zolpidem and possibly all benzodiazepine site ligands is most likely a result of positive allosteric modulation at {alpha}1 subunit-containing GABAA receptors and not due to a specific interaction with {alpha}5 subunit-containing GABAA receptors. Recent data using the knock-in approach have also indicated that tolerance to the sedative effects of diazepam is absent in {alpha}5 (H105R) mice, suggesting that activation of {alpha}5 subunit-containing GABAA receptors is important for the development of tolerance (van Rijnsoever et al., 2004Go). In rodent studies, zolpidem has been reported to have a lower tolerance propensity than benzodiazepines (Perrault et al., 1992Go), although in primates, tolerance comparable with that of benzodiazepines was observed (Griffiths et al., 1992Go). The fact that tolerance can be observed with zolpidem would suggest that activity at {alpha}5 subunit containing GABAA receptors is not an absolute requirement. Ethanol potentiates the sedative-hypnotic effects of benzodiazepine site ligands, an effect that has recently been linked with {alpha}2 subunit-containing GABAA receptors (Tauber et al., 2003Go). This is supported by clinical studies that have found no major interaction between ethanol and zolpidem (Wilkinson, 1995Go), in contrast to the well known potentiation of the effects of ethanol by benzodiazepines (Hollister, 1990Go).

What are the implications of the GABAA receptor subtype selectivity profile of indiplon? The high affinity of indiplon for {alpha}1 subunit-containing GABAA receptors is consistent with the effects observed in rodents (Foster et al., 2004Go) and humans (Roth et al., 2003Go) after indiplon administration. Human electroencephalogram studies with indiplon have indicated that a plasma level of 5 ng/ml (13 nM) is associated with hypnotic effects (Jochelson et al., 2003Go). Because the effective concentration of indiplon at the relevant GABAA receptor sites in the brain is likely to be at least one order of magnitude lower due to plasma and tissue binding, this corresponds well with the high affinity of indiplon observed in the present study for {alpha}1 subunit-containing GABAA receptors. Compared with {alpha}1 subunit-containing GABAA receptors, indiplon showed approximately 10-fold lower affinity at {alpha}2 subunit-containing GABAA receptors, which might predict that anxiolytic effects and an interaction with ethanol are not prominent features of its pharmacology. Accordingly, no prominent pharmacodynamic interaction between indiplon and ethanol was observed in clinical studies (Berkowitz et al., 2003Go). Indiplon does show anxiolytic effects in the Vogel conflict test of anxiety in the rat, but over a dose range where sedative effects are also observed (Foster et al., 2004Go). This is in contrast to diazepam, which despite having no separation of affinity between {alpha}1 and {alpha}2 subunit-containing GABAA receptors has anticonflict effects at doses lower than its sedative effects. Consequently, the greater selectivity of indiplon for {alpha}1 versus {alpha}2 subunit-containing GABAA receptors is consistent with this profile. Indiplon has approximately 30-fold selectivity for {alpha}1 versus {alpha}5 subunit-containing GABAA receptors, which might predict that indiplon has less propensity to produce amnesic effects and tolerance. However, this should be interpreted with caution because, as noted above, zolpidem has shown amnesic effects and evidence of tolerance, despite no measurable affinity for {alpha}5 subunit-containing GABAA receptors. However, the combination of 30-fold selectivity for {alpha}1 versus {alpha}5 subunit-containing GABAA receptors and a 1- to 2-h half-life (Foster et al., 2004Go) bodes well for a low incidence of residual amnesia and tolerance with indiplon. Indeed, a lack of tolerance to repeated indiplon administration has been observed in man (Jochelson et al., 2003Go; Scharf et al., 2005Go).

In conclusion, we demonstrate that indiplon has the highest affinity for GABAA receptors of the currently known nonbenzodiazepine positive allosteric modulators and exhibits selectivity for {alpha}1 subunit-containing GABAA receptors. The pharmacological profile of indiplon in animals is consistent with its {alpha}1 selectivity, and ongoing clinical trials will characterize in detail its hypnotic profile in humans.


    Acknowledgements
 
We thank Ray Gross for synthesizing indiplon and zaleplon, Richard Olsen for providing GABAA receptor subunits clones, and Harvey Clark for assistance in preparing the figures.


    Footnotes
 
ABBREVIATIONS: Ro15-1788, flumazenil; Ro15-4513, ethyl 8-azido-5,6-dihydro-5-methyl-6-oxo-4H-imidazo[1,5-a]-[1,4]benzodiazepine-3-carboxylate; HEK, human embryonic kidney; NBQX, 2,3-dihydroxy-6-nitro-7-sulfamoylbenzo(f)quinoxaline; AMPA, {alpha}-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; AUC, area under the curve; ANOVA, analysis of variance.

doi:10.1124/jpet.105.096701.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Robert E. Petroski, Department of Neuroscience, Neurocrine Biosciences Inc., 12790 El Camino Real, San Diego, CA 92130. E-mail: rpetroski{at}neurocrine.com


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

Barnard EA, Skolnick P, Olsen RW, Mohler H, Sieghart W, Biggio G, Braestrup C, Bateson AN, and Langer SZ (1998) International Union of Pharmacology. XV. Subtypes of gamma-aminobutyric acidA receptors: classification on the basis of subunit structure and receptor function. Pharmacol Rev 50: 291–313.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Berkowitz DV, Scharf MB, Jochelson P, Oliva J, Boyd M, Kean Y, and Campbell B (2003) The co-administration of indiplon (NBI 34060) and alcohol lacks pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions. Sleep 26: A81.
Blednov YA, Jung S, Alva H, Wallace D, Rosahl T, Whiting PJ, and Harris RA (2003) Deletion of the alpha1 or beta2 subunit of GABAA receptors reduces actions of alcohol and other drugs. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 304: 30–36.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Bohme I, Rabe H, and Luddens H (2004) Four amino acids in the alpha subunits determine the gamma-aminobutyric acid sensitivities of GABAA receptor subtypes. J Biol Chem 279: 35193–35200.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Chang Y, Wang R, Barot S, and Weiss DS (1996) Stoichiometry of a recombinant GABAA receptor. J Neurosci 16: 5415–5424.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Collinson N, Kuenzi FM, Jarolimek W, Maubach KA, Cothliff R, Sur C, Smith A, Otu FM, Howell O, Atack JR, et al. (2002) Enhanced learning and memory and altered GABAergic synaptic transmission in mice lacking the alpha 5 subunit of the GABAA receptor. J Neurosci 22: 5572–5580.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Crestani F, Keist R, Fritschy JM, Benke D, Vogt K, Prut L, Bluthmann H, Mohler H, and Rudolph U (2002) Trace fear conditioning involves hippocampal alpha5 GABA(A) receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 8980–8985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Crestani F, Martin JR, Mohler H, and Rudolph U (2000) Mechanism of action of the hypnotic zolpidem in vivo. Br J Pharmacol 131: 1251–1254.[CrossRef][Medline]
Damgen K and Luddens H (1999) Zaleplon displays a selectivity to recombinant GABAA receptors different from zolpidem, zopiclone and benzodiazepines. Neurosci Res Commun 25: 139–148.
Fleck MW (2002) Molecular actions of (S)-desmethylzopiclone (SEP-174559), an anxiolytic metabolite of zopiclone. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 302: 612–618.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Foster AC, Pelleymounter MA, Cullen MJ, Lewis D, Joppa M, Chen TK, Bozigian HP, Gross RS, and Gogas KR (2004) In vivo pharmacological characterization of indiplon, a novel pyrazolopyrimidine sedative-hypnotic. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 311: 547–559.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Fritschy JM and Mohler H (1995) GABAA-receptor heterogeneity in the adult rat brain: differential regional and cellular distribution of seven major subunits. J Comp Neurol 359: 154–194.[CrossRef][Medline]
Graham D, Faure C, Besnard F, and Langer SZ (1996) Pharmacological profile of benzodiazepine site ligands with recombinant GABA receptor subtypes. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 6: 119–125.[Medline]
Griffiths RR, Sannerud CA, Ator NA, and Brady JV (1992) Zolpidem behavioral pharmacology in baboons: self-injection, discrimination, tolerance and withdrawal. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 260: 1199–1208.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Hadingham KL, Wingrove P, Le Bourdelles B, Palmer KJ, Ragan CI, and Whiting PJ (1993) Cloning of cDNA sequences encoding human alpha 2 and alpha 3 gamma-aminobutyric acidA receptor subunits and characterization of the benzodiazepine pharmacology of recombinant alpha 1-, alpha 2-, alpha 3- and alpha 5-containing human gamma-aminobutyric acidA receptors. Mol Pharmacol 43: 970–975.[Abstract]
Hollister LE (1990) Interactions between alcohol and benzodiazepines. Recent Dev Alcohol 8: 233–239.[Medline]
Jochelson P, Chen TK, Farber R, and Campbell B (2003) Lack of pharmacological and pharmacokinetic tolerance following repeat dosing of indiplon (NBI 34060). Sleep 26: A85.
Korpi ER, Grunder G, and Luddens H (2002) Drug interactions at GABA(A) receptors. Prog Neurobiol 67: 113–159.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kralic JE, O'Buckley TK, Khisti RT, Hodge CW, Homanics GE, and Morrow AL (2002) GABA(A) receptor alpha-1 subunit deletion alters receptor subtype assembly, pharmacological and behavioral responses to benzodiazepines and zolpidem. Neuropharmacology 43: 685–694.[CrossRef][Medline]
Langer SZ, Faure-Halley C, Seeburg P, Graham D, and Arbilla S (1992) The selectivity of zolpidem and alpidem for the {alpha}1-subunit of the GABAA receptor. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2: 234.
Low K, Crestani F, Keist R, Benke D, Brunig I, Benson JA, Fritschy JM, Rulicke T, Bluethmann H, Mohler H, et al. (2000) Molecular and neuronal substrate for the selective attenuation of anxiety. Science (Wash DC) 290: 131–134.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Macdonald RL and Olsen RW (1994) GABAA receptor channels. Annu Rev Neurosci 17: 569–602.[Medline]
McKernan RM, Rosahl TW, Reynolds DS, Sur C, Wafford KA, Atack JR, Farrar S, Myers J, Cook G, Ferris P, et al. (2000) Sedative but not anxiolytic properties of benzodiazepines are mediated by the GABA(A) receptor alpha1 subtype. Nat Neurosci 3: 587–592.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mitler MM (2000) Nonselective and selective benzodiazepine receptor agonists–where are we today? Sleep 23: S39–S47.[Medline]
Mohler H, Fritschy JM, and Rudolph U (2002) A new benzodiazepine pharmacology. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 300: 2–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Perrault G, Morel E, Sanger DJ, and Zivkovic B (1992) Lack of tolerance and physical dependence upon repeated treatment with the novel hypnotic zolpidem. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 263: 298–303.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Roehrs T, Merlotti L, Zorick F, and Roth T (1994) Sedative, memory and performance effects of hypnotics. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 116: 130–134.[CrossRef][Medline]
Roth T, Walsh JK, Rogowski R, Farber R, Burke J, and Jochelson P (2003) Efficacy and tolerability of indiplon (NBI 34060) solution in healthy adults in a model of transient insomnia. Sleep 26: A87.
Rudolph U, Crestani F, Benke D, Brunig I, Benson JA, Fritschy JM, Martin JR, Bluethmann H, and Mohler H (1999) Benzodiazepine actions mediated by specific gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) receptor subtypes. Nature (Lond) 401: 796–800.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sanger DJ (2004) The pharmacology and mechanisms of action of new generation, non-benzodiazepine hypnotic agents. CNS Drugs 18: 9–15.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sanna E, Busonero F, Talani G, Carta M, Massa F, Peis M, Maciocco E, and Biggio G (2002) Comparison of the effects of zaleplon, zolpidem and triazolam at various GABA(A) receptor subtypes. Eur J Pharmacol 451: 103–110.[CrossRef][Medline]
Scharf MB, Black J, Hull S, Mahowald M, Moscovitch A, Farber R, and Jochelson P (2005) Long term efficacy and tolerability of Indipon-IR in the treatment of chronic insomnia: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled 3-month study. Sleep 28: A229.
Schofield PR, Darlison MG, Fujita N, Burt DR, Stephenson FA, Rodriguez H, Rhee LM, Ramachandran J, Reale V, Glencourse TA, et al. (1987) Sequence and functional expression of the GABAA receptor shows a ligand-gated receptor superfamily. Nature (Lond) 328: 221–227.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sullivan SK, Petroski RE, Verge G, Gross RS, Foster AC, and Grigoriadis DE (2004) Characterization of the interaction of indiplon, a novel pyrazolopyrimidine sedative-hypnotic, with the GABAA receptor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 311: 537–546.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Tauber M, Calame-Droz E, Prut L, Rudolph U, and Crestani F (2003) alpha2-gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA)A receptors are the molecular substrates mediating precipitation of narcosis but not of sedation by the combined use of diazepam and alcohol in vivo. Eur J Neurosci 18: 2599–2604.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tretter V, Ehya N, Fuchs K, and Sieghart W (1997) Stoichiometry and assembly of a recombinant GABAA receptor subtype. J Neurosci 17: 2728–2737.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
van Rijnsoever C, Tauber M, Choulli MK, Keist R, Rudolph U, Mohler H, Fritschy JM, and Crestani F (2004) Requirement of alpha5-GABAA receptors for the development of tolerance to the sedative action of diazepam in mice. J Neurosci 24: 6785–6790.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Whiting PJ (2003) GABA-A receptor subtypes in the brain: a paradigm for CNS drug discovery? Drug Discov Today 8: 445–450.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wieland HA, Lüddens H, and Seeburg PH (1992) A single histidine in GABAA receptors is essential for benzodiazepine agonist binding. J Biol Chem 267: 1426–1429.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Wilkinson CJ (1995) The acute effects of zolpidem, administered alone and with alcohol, on cognitive and psychomotor function. J Clin Psychiatry 56: 309–318.[Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
J. C Marrs
Indiplon: A Nonbenzodiazepine Sedative-Hypnotic for the Treatment of Insomnia
Ann. Pharmacother., July 1, 2008; 42(7): 1070 - 1079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
S. Passarella and M.-T. Duong
Diagnosis and treatment of insomnia
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., May 15, 2008; 65(10): 927 - 934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
L. P. Carter, R. R. Griffiths, P. E. Suess, J. H. Casada, C. L. Wallace, and J. D. Roache
Relative Abuse Liability of Indiplon and Triazolam in Humans: A Comparison of Psychomotor, Subjective, and Cognitive Effects
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 2007; 322(2): 749 - 759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.105.096701v1
317/1/369    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Petroski, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Foster, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Petroski, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Foster, A. C.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition