![[Feedback]](/icons/banner/feedbackACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[For Subscribers]](/icons/banner/subscriberACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Archive]](/icons/banner/archiveACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Search]](/icons/banner/searchACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Contents]](/icons/banner/tocACT.gif){kind=icon}
|
|
|
|
|
||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
Headache Group, Institute of Neurology and the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom
Received September 10, 2003; accepted December 5, 2003.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract Materials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
9-tetrahydocannanbinol, the psychoactive constituent of cannabis. It may be a possible therapeutic target for migraine. In this study, we looked at the possible role of the CB1 receptor in the trigeminovascular system, using intravital microscopy to study the effects of anandamide against various vasodilator agents. Anandamide was able to inhibit dural blood vessel dilation brought about by electrical stimulation by 50%, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) by 30%, capsaicin by 45%, and nitric oxide by 40%. CGRP8–37 was also able to attenuate nitric oxide (NO)-induced dilation by 50%. The anandamide inhibition was reversed by the CB1 receptor antagonist AM251. Anandamide also reduced the blood pressure changes caused by CGRP injection, this effect was not reversed by AM251. It would seem that anandamide acts both presynaptically, to prevent CGRP release from trigeminal sensory fibers, and postsynaptically to inhibit the CGRP-induced NO release in the smooth muscle of dural arteries. CB1 receptors seem to be involved in the NO/CGRP relationship that exists in causing headache and dural blood vessel dilation. It also seems that some of the blood pressure changes caused by anandamide are mediated by a noncannabinoid receptor, as AM251 was unable to reverse these effects. It can be suggested that anandamide is tonically released to play some form of modulatory role in the trigeminovascular system.
). Trigeminal sensory nerve fibers that innervate the cranial vasculature contain calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), substance P, and neurokinin A (Uddman and Edvinsson, 1989). Activation of these A
trigeminal fibers cause the release of CGRP (Goadsby et al., 1988) that in turn causes vasodilation of cranial blood vessels (Williamson et al., 1997c). Recent clinical trial evidence suggests that blockade of CGRP has a potent acute antimigraine effect (Olesen et al., 2003).
Arachidonylethanolamide (anandamide, AEA) is believed to be the endogenous ligand to the cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors (Matsuda et al., 1990; Hoehe et al., 1991) that are found in the central and peripheral nervous systems. CB1 receptors are localized on fibers in the spinal trigeminal tract and spinal trigeminal nucleus caudalis (Tsou et al., 1998), whereas CB2 receptors are found predominantly in the immune system (Egertová and Elphick, 2000). The CB1 and CB2 receptors are negatively coupled through G proteins to adenylate cyclase and various calcium channel types (Gebremedhin et al., 1999; Hillard, 2000). Anandamide mediates vascular changes via CB1 receptors found on cerebral artery smooth muscle and the smooth muscle of other vascular beds and modulates cerebral vascular tone (Plane et al., 1997; Gebremedhin et al., 1999). Receptors in the endothelium of blood vessels, responsive to anandamide, also affect the vasculature, although this seems to be mediated by an anandamide receptor distinct from the CB1 receptor (Pratt et al., 1998; Wagner et al., 1999).
The known behavioral effects of anandamide are similar to that of 9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the psychoactive constituent of cannabis, being antinociception, catalepsy, hypothermia, and depression of motor activity (Dewey, 1986; Adams et al., 1998). Although there is a history of anecdotal evidence suggesting the use of cannabinoids is effective at reducing headache and providing other pain relief, its potential as an acute migraine treatment and even preventive has never been scientifically studied in animal studies or clinical trial (Russo, 1998). However, one anonymous standardized survey found that of those using cannabis medicinally, over 10% were using it to relieve headache or migraine (Schnelle et al., 1999). Although many aspects of the study are open to debate, such as the highly selected nature of patient group, it is nevertheless an interesting observation.
In this study, we used intravital microscopy, which allows continual measurement of dural blood vessel diameter, to examine the effects of anandamide against dural vessel dilation brought about by electrical stimulation, CGRP, capsaicin, and nitric oxide (NO)-induced dural dilation (Williamson et al., 1997a,b; Akerman et al., 2002a, 2003b). We were also able to monitor the mean arterial blood pressure changes caused by the chemical vasodilators, and the effect of ananadamide. Neurogenic dural vasodilation identifies potential migraine targets such as sumatriptan (Williamson et al., 1997b) and opioid agonists (Williamson et al., 2001). CGRP injections trigger both migraine (Lassen et al., 2002) and dural vessel dilation (Williamson et al., 1997a) and CGRP antagonists have acute antimigraine properties (Olesen et al., 2003). NO is another known trigger of migraine (Dalsgaard-Nielsen, 1955; Thomsen et al., 1994) and dural vessel dilation (Akerman et al., 2002c). Both NO-induced dural vessel dilation (Akerman et al., 2002a) and headache (Iversen and Olesen, 1996) are affected by the antimigraine compound sumatriptan. Capsaicin has also been shown to cause vasodilation of dural arteries via the release of CGRP from trigeminal nerve ending (Akerman et al., 2002b). We examined whether any of the effects of anandamide were reversed by the CB1 receptor antagonist AM251. CGRP antagonists have proved successful as a treatment for migraine in patients (Olesen et al., 2003), as well as for neurogenic, CGRP, and capsaicin-induced dilation; therefore, to validate the use of anandamide against NO-induced dilation we wanted see whether NO-induced dilation could be inhibited by CGRP8–37, the CGRP receptor blocker, first before using with anandamide.
|
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Intravital Microscopy
The cranial window was covered with mineral oil (37°C) and a branch of the middle meningeal artery viewed using an intravital microscope (MV2100; Microvision, Cambridge, UK) and the image displayed on a television monitor. Dural blood vessel diameter was continuously measured using a video dimension analyzer (Living Systems Instrumentation, Burlington, VT) and displayed with blood pressure on an online data analysis system (CED spike4 version 2 software).
Experimental Protocols
Defining Electrical Stimulation Parameters. Electrical stimulation was used to evoke dilation of the dural blood vessels with a bipolar stimulating electrode (NE 200X; Clark Electromedical, Edenbridge, Kent, UK) placed on the surface of the cranial window approximately 200 µm from the vessel of interest. The surface of the cranial window was stimulated at 5 Hz, 1 ms for 10 s (Grass stimulator S88) with increasing voltage until maximal dilation was observed. Subsequent electrically induced responses in the same animal were then evoked using that voltage (Williamson et al., 1997b; Akerman et al., 2002c).
CGRP, Capsaicin, and NO-Induced Dilation. In the preparations where CGRP was used to dilate dural blood vessels, CGRP was given as an intravenous bolus of 1 µg kg-1, and this has been shown previously to produce a maximal dilation (Williamson et al., 1997a). In those preparations where capsaicin was used to dilate the dural blood vessels, capsaicin was given as an intravenous bolus up to 7 µg kg-1, until a maximal dilation was observed (Akerman et al., 2003b). In preparations where NO was used to dilate the dural blood vessel, sodium nitroprusside, the NO donor, was given as a 10-min infusion at 2 µg kg-1 min-1 via the carotid artery, as to produce maximal dilation (Akerman et al., 2002a).
The reproducibility of the vasodilator challenges has been demonstrated previously using either three or four consecutive saline-controlled stimuli for electrical stimulation and CGRP bolus (Akerman et al., 2002c), capsaicin bolus (Akerman et al., 2003b), and sodium nitroprusside (Akerman et al., 2002a), to test whether there was any systematic effect of test compounds over time in the meningeal circulation. In each case, there was no significant effect across the cohort. In these studies, on each occasion the chemical vasodilators were administered they caused a significant drop in blood pressure (S. Akerman, unpublished data). CGRP and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) injections caused decreases in blood pressure that were not significantly different across the cohorts. Blood pressure changes caused by capsaicin are triphasic, as has been demonstrated previously (Chahl and Lynch, 1987), and the response to second and third injections of capsaicin was reduced compared with the first injection.
Effects of the Cannabinoid Agonist Anandamide on Evoked Dural Vessel Dilation. The effects of the cannabinoid receptor agonist anandamide were studied. A control response to one of the vasodilator challenges, either electrical stimulation, bolus of CGRP or capsaicin was performed and at least 10 min later anandamide (1 mg kg-1) was administered intravenously, and the vasodilator repeated 10 min later. Using the same protocol a second dose of anandamide (3 mg kg-1) was given and a third vasodilator challenge performed. In the series of experiments involving CGRP a third dose of anandamide (10 mg kg-1) was given followed by a fourth bolus of CGRP, all in the same animal.
NO-induced dural vessel dilation was tested with anandamide using a similar protocol. Two control responses to sodium nitroprusside infusion (2 µg kg-1 min-1) for 10 min. Completion of the second infusion was followed, at least 10 min later, by a bolus injection of anandamide (3 mg kg-1), which was followed 10 min later by a repeat of the sodium nitroprusside infusion.
Effect of a CB1 Receptor Antagonist in Reversing the Actions of Anandamide. In separate series of experiments, the response of the selective CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 was used to determine whether it could reverse any of the effects that anandamide had on the vasodilator challenges. Initially, we used a similar protocol to that reported above to determine the effects of anandamide (3 mg kg-1) against either electrical stimulation, CGRP, or sodium nitroprusside. After the observation of the effects of anandamide, AM251 (3 mg kg-1), a selective CB1 receptor antagonist, was administered intravenously and was followed by another repeat of the vasodilator challenge 5 min later. It has been shown previously that the antinociceptive affects of anandamide, using tail-flick responses, last up to at least an hour (Smith et al., 1994; Adams et al., 1995). We were therefore confident that the effect of anandamide would still be acting when we followed up the initial observation of anandamide with that of the CB1 antagonist.
Effect of the CGRP Receptor Blocker CGRP8–37 on NO-Induced Dilation. The NO donor sodium nitroprusside was infused for 10 min in the rat to provide a control vasodilation. At least 10 min after the dural blood vessel had returned to its original baseline state, a second infusion was begun, after 5 min of infusion CGRP8–37 (300 µg kg-1) was given as an intravenous bolus, and the sodium nitroprusside infusion continued for a further 5 min.
Data Analysis. The effects of electrical stimulation, bolus of CGRP or capsaicin, and sodium nitroprusside infusion on dural vessel diameter were calculated as a percent increase from the prestimulation baseline diameter. The nature of the experimental setup, where the magnification of the dural vessel visualized was different in each setup by virtue of selecting an appropriate target vessel, made it impossible to standardize the dural vessel measurement; therefore, the dural vessel diameter was measured in arbitrary units. The typical vessel diameter measured ranges from 120 to 150 µm. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. Statistical analysis was initially performed using an analysis of variance for repeated measures with a two-factor (baseline and treatment) model. Main effects were compared after Bonferroni confidence interval adjustment. Between treatment comparisons were made with Student's paired t test (SPSS version 10.0) on effects found different in the analysis of variance and are thus reported in detail. Significance was assessed at the P < 0.05 level.
Drugs. The infusion of anesthetic and experimental drugs were all via the same femoral catheter, however, the line was always flushed with saline first, several minutes before administering the different compound. Anandamide (Tocris Cookson Ltd., Bristol, UK) in water-soluble emulsion was further diluted in water for injection. It has been shown previously that dosing between 1 and 10 mg kg-1 is antinociceptive in the rat, and this effect can last up to 30 min (Adams et al., 1995, 1998; Stein et al., 1996). CGRP (Sigma Chemical, Poole, Dorset, UK) and the CGRP receptor blocker CGRP8–37 (Sigma Chemical) were dissolved in deoxygenated water, aliquoted, and frozen until required and then redissolved in 0.9% NaCl for use. Capsaicin (Sigma Chemical) was dissolved in a 1:1:8 solution of Tween 80 (polyoxyethylene-sorbitan mono-oleate; Sigma Chemical)/ethanol/0.9% NaCl. AM251 (Tocris Cookson Ltd.) was initially dissolved in a couple of drops of dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma Chemical) and further dilated in the solution of Tween 80, ethanol, and saline. Sodium nitroprusside (Sigma Chemical) was dissolved in 0.9% NaCl.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
|
|
Effect of Anandamide and Then CB1 Receptor Antagonism on CGRP-Induced Dilation. Increases in dural blood vessel diameter evoked by CGRP (1 µg kg-1 i.v.) were significantly inhibited when pretreated with anandamide, 120 ± 7 to 89 ± 10% (3 mg kg-1, n = 14, t13 = 6.6, P < 0.05) and 129 ± 11 to 89 ± 14% (10 mg kg-1, n = 6, t5 = 5.7, P < 0.05), respectively. The reduction of the CGRP-induced dilation brought about by anandamide (3 mg kg-1) was significantly reversed by the CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 (3 mg kg-1, n = 8, t7 = 6.1), 87 ± 7 to 129 ± 11%, this return of dilation was significantly different from the original control dilation, 114 ± 9 to 129 ± 11% (3 mg kg-1, n = 8, t7 = 2.6; Figs. 1 and 3).
|
Effect of Anandamide on Capsaicin-Induced Dilation. Dural blood vessel dilation brought about by capsaicin showed a significant reduction after pretreatment with anandamide (1 and 3 mg kg-1, n = 6) compared with the control dilation, 118 ± 15 to 89 ± 14% (t5 = 4.0) and 65 ± 18% (t5 = 5.4), respectively (P < 0.05; Fig. 4).
|
Effect of Anandamide and Then CB1 Receptor Antagonism on Sodium Nitroprusside-Induced Dilation. Dural blood vessel dilation brought about by sodium nitroprusside infusion (2 µg kg-1 min-1) showed a significant reduction after pretreatment with a 3 mg kg-1 dose of anandamide, 112 ± 10 to 71 ± 9% (n = 14, t13 = 6.2, P < 0.05). The reduction of the sodium nitroprusside-induced dilation brought about by anandamide (3 mg kg-1) was significantly reversed by the CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 (3 mg kg-1, n = 6, t5 = 3.4), 79 ± 11 to 112 ± 19%, and this return of dilation was not significant from the original control dilation, 123 ± 16 to 112 ± 19%; Figs. 1 and 5.
|
Effect of AM251 on Dural Blood Vessel Caliber. AM251 caused a nonsignificant 7 ± 6% (n = 22, t21 = 1.542, P = 0.138) decrease in dural blood vessel caliber that was restored to preinjection levels before vasodilator challenge was repeated.
Effect of CGRP8–37 on NO-Induced Dural Blood Vessel Diameter. The CGRP receptor blocker CGRP8–37 (300 µg kg-1, n = 8) was able to inhibit NO-induced dilation, 117 ± 8 to 56 ± 14% (t6 = 4.8, P < 0.05). The inhibition was also significant compared with the initial control NO-induced dilation, 104 ± 12 to 56 ± 14% (t7 = 4.1, P < 0.05; Fig. 6.
|
Effect of Anandamide and AM251 on Arterial Blood Pressure. Ananadamide caused a significant decrease in mean arterial blood pressure of 30.3 ± 5 mm Hg (1 mg kg-1, n = 16, t15 = 6.18, P < 0.001), 30.4 ± 2 mm Hg (3 mg kg-1, n = 38, t37 = 14.13, P < 0.001) and 30.1 ± 7 (10 mg kg-1, n = 5, t4 = 4.59, P < 0.05). There was no overall difference between the blood pressure changes across the doses (F3,68 = 0.05, P = 0.985). The changes in blood pressure caused by anandamide were accompanied by a dose-dependent increase in vessel diameter, which is dealt with elsewhere (Akerman et al., 2003a).
AM251 caused a significant reduction in blood pressure 23 ± 4 mm Hg (n = 22, t21 = 5.431, P < 0.0001), which was accompanied by a 7 ± 6% decrease in dural blood vessel diameter, both were restored to preinjection levels before vasodilator challenge was repeated.
Effect of Anandamide and AM251 on Hypotensive Changes Caused by CGRP, Capsaicin, and Sodium Nitroprusside. On each occasion CGRP injections caused a significant drop in blood pressure (Tables 1 and 2); however, in the case of the 3 mg kg-1 dose of anandamide this drop was significantly reduced, 48 ± 5 mm Hg drop compared with 29 ± 3 mm Hg (3 mg kg-1, n = 11, t10 = 4, P < 0.05). When AM251 was used to reverse the effects of anandamide, it was unable to reverse the reduced blood pressure change found with the 3 mg kg-1 dose (Table 2).
|
|
The blood pressure response to capsaicin was significantly decreased after each injection; however, the level of drop was reduced after anandamide treatment 42 ± 3 mm Hg compared with 35 ± 3 mm Hg (1 mg kg-1, n = 6, t5 = 2.87, P < 0.05) and 29 ± 4 mm Hg (3 mg kg-1, n = 6, t5 = 4.19, P < 0.05; Table 1). There was no significant difference in the blood pressure change between the anandamide doses.
Each infusion of sodium nitroprusside caused a significant reduction in blood pressure (Table 1). The blood pressure changes with sodium nitroprusside alone were not significant compared with the SNP changes with anandamide (F2,27 = 0.348, P = 0.71) or AM251 (n = 6, F2,10 = 0.35, P = 0.71).
The blood pressure did not change significantly when the CGRP receptor antagonist CGRP8–37 was given during a sodium nitroprusside infusion, 102 ± 10 to 103 ± 10 mm Hg.
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Neurogenic dural vasodilation is likely to be a result of CGRP release via activation of perivascular trigeminal sensory nerve fibers. Anandamide was able to attenuate the neurogenic dural vasodilation by over 50%, and the CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 reversed this. This effect of anandamide may involve either pre- or postsynaptic receptors, or both, to inhibit dural vasodilation. In contrast, we have reasoned that exogenous CGRP is acting directly on postsynaptic CGRP receptors in the smooth muscle of dural arteries. Anandamide is also able to attenuate the CGRP-induced dural blood vessel dilation by just over 30%, an effect reversed by the CB1 receptor antagonist, AM251. Therefore, it would seem that anandamide is at least acting postsynaptically to inhibit dural blood vessel dilation, and may, in addition, be acting presynaptically to account for the greater attenuation of the response. Because the CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 was able to reverse the effects of anandamide, it seems likely that the responses reported are due to activation of the CB1 receptor. Anandamide was also able to inhibit capsaicin-induced dilation. Capsaicin evokes CGRP release from trigeminal sensory nerves (Flores et al., 2001) and more generally from sensory nerve terminals (Saito and Goto, 1986; Maggi et al., 1988; Martling et al., 1988). We have also previously shown (Akerman et al., 2003b) using this model that the capsaicin-mediated dilation is inhibited by a CGRP blocker and therefore it is likely that capsaicin-induced dilation is mediated by CGRP release. Given that anandamide is able to inhibit CGRP induced dilation acting postjunctionally, it seems reasonable to conclude that it is also inhibiting the capsaicin-induced dilation via this same mechanism.
Anandamide was able to attenuate the dural blood vessel increases caused by sodium nitroprusside (an NO donor) infusions by 37%. Anandamide is able to inhibit nitric oxide production in macrophage and microglial cells (Coffey et al., 1996). In our experimental design, anandamide-mediated alterations in NO generation are unlikely given that we are providing the NO exogenously. When a formalin test was performed in spinally microdialysed mice to promote nociception, anandamide, indomethacin, and L-nitroarginine methylester (L-NAME), an NO synthase inhibitor, were all able to reduce pain-related behavior, and these effects were reversed by the CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 (Guhring et al., 2002). It is interesting from a translational and head pain perspective that AM251 is able to reverse the antinociceptive effects of both L-NAME and indomethacin in the spinal dorsal horn (Guhring et al., 2002). This is especially so given that L-NAME is able to attenuate both neurogenic and CGRP-induced dural vessel dilation (Akerman et al., 2002c) and that indomethacin attenuates both NO-induced headache (Castellano et al., 1998) and NO-induced dural vessel dilation (Akerman et al., 2002a). They also found that the endocannabinoid reuptake blocker AM404 reduced pain-related behavior, indicating that endocannabinoids are either naturally released in response to pain, or that they provide tonic antinociceptive effects (Guhring et al., 2002). The latter may be altered by rates of degradation, which have recently been reported to be abnormal in migraineurs (Cupini et al., 2003).
We also observed that the CGRP receptor blocker CGRP8–37 attenuated the sodium nitroprusside-induced blood vessel dilation by over 50% when applied during the infusion. This suggests that NO may activate trigeminal neurons to release CGRP and CGRP8–37 blocks the response postsynaptically. We have demonstrated previously that endothelial NO synthase inhibitors are able attenuate CGRP-induced dilation (Akerman et al., 2002c). Given that anandamide is able to attenuate both CGRP and NO-induced dilation, the CB1 receptor may also play a role in the NO/CGRP relationship.
In the context of our model of trigeminovascular activation, how is anandamide and more specifically the CB1 receptor involved? Considering CGRP-induced dural vessel dilation first, anandamide was able to attenuate it by 30%, this is similar to the effect of specific endothelial NOS inhibitors in the same model (Akerman et al., 2002c). Given the CB1 receptor is present in the smooth muscle of cerebral arteries and other vascular beds (Plane et al., 1997; Gebremedhin et al., 1999; Hillard, 2000), it is possible that there are CB1 receptors in the smooth muscle of dural arteries. These receptors would mediate the post-synaptic inhibition of CGRP-induced dilation perhaps by interfering with the CGRP-induced NO production that takes place via the activation of endothelial NOS.
Neurogenic dural vasodilation is attenuated by anandamide by over 50%, and this is similar to the attenuation brought about by specific neuronal NOS (nNOS) inhibitors (Akerman et al., 2002c). The data presented here indicate that anandamide may be acting on presynaptic terminals of trigeminal neurons to prevent CGRP release, similar to previous findings that nNOS inhibitors seem to prevent NO production from trigeminal terminals and thus, reduce CGRP release. Anandamide seems to be acting on a CB1 receptor because the highly specific CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 was able to reverse this effect. There is evidence that the CB1 receptor plays a part in modulating neuronal type (N-type) calcium channel currents, in that, activation of the CB1 receptor in neuroblastoma cells was shown to inhibit the N-type calcium channel, via a pertussis-sensitive G protein (Caulfield and Brown, 1992). Inhibiting the N-type calcium channel thus reduces calcium transport into cells and, therefore, reduces the likelihood of cells firing (Pan et al., 1998). It is possible that anandamide is decreasing the likelihood of cell firing and therefore, reducing the likelihood of CGRP release and nNOS activity in presynaptic trigeminal sensory nerve terminals.
Anandamide was able to attenuate the NO-induced dural vessel dilation by nearly 40%, CGRP8–37 by over 50%. Indometacin also attenuates NO-induced dural vessel dilation perhaps by inhibiting the activity of trigeminal neurons (Akerman et al., 2002a). Pestonjamasp and Burstein (1998) suggested that indometacin may actually protect anandamide from metabolism into prostaglandin ethanolamine, thus allowing more anandamide to be present in the system. Others have suggested that increasing levels of anandamide by prolonging its time at the synapse, helps exert its antinociceptive effects (Guhring et al., 2002). It is likely then that anandamide is inhibiting the NO-induced dilation in a similar way to that described with neurogenic dural vasodilation, by decreasing the likelihood of trigeminal neurons firing, and inhibiting CGRP release. CGRP8–37 is likely to be blocking trigeminal sensory nerve fiber activated NO-induced CGRP release postsynaptically. Similar findings have been found in cats, in that NO-induced cerebral vasodilation was reduced by CGRP8–37 (Wei et al., 1992).
Blood Pressure Effects. Anandamide and AM251 were both found to have an effect on blood pressure when given intravenously. Anandamide reduced the blood pressure, and this was accompanied by a dose-dependent increase in dural blood vessel diameter. It is believed that this effect may reflect activity at the vanilloid type 1 receptor rather than the CB1 receptor as anandamide has been found to act as an agonist at the vanilloid type 1 receptor (Zygmunt et al., 1999). Further research into this area needs to be done before we can conclude that anandamide is able to activate trigeminal neurons and causes dural vessel dilation. AM251 also reduced blood pressure with a slight decrease in dural vessel diameter.
The profound blood pressure effects of CGRP and capsaicin seemed to be reduced after anandamide treatment. Neither anandamide nor CGRP8–37 was able to alter the blood pressure changes produced by sodium nitroprusside. It has been shown previously that the effects of capsaicin on blood pressure are reduced over consecutive injections; therefore, it seems likely that a similar reaction is occurring here rather than an effect of anandamide. There are other known vascular changes caused by anandamide that are endothelial, NO-dependent that are mediated by an anandamide receptor distinct from the CB1 receptor (Pratt et al., 1998; Wagner et al., 1999). It has been shown that the hypotensive effects of CGRP can be reduced with the use of a 
-adrenergic antagonist, without affecting the brain blood flow (Shen et al., 2001) indicating that the blood flow changes are in some part not simply due to cerebral CGRP receptors. These data suggest that the vasodilator effects of CGRP and capsaicin are not directly related to their hypotensive effects.
Anandamide or the CB1 receptor site represents a potential therapeutic target for migraine, given anandamide's ability to attenuate neurogenic, CGRP, and NO-induced dural vessel dilation. It has been shown for the first time that anandamide is able to inhibit the neurons in the trigeminovascular system when activated by various approaches. This inhibition is likely to involve both pre- and postsynaptic mechanisms. The data also suggest that anandamide may tonically inhibit neuronal firing in the trigeminovascular system, and manipulation of its transport reuptake, with endocannabinoid transporter blockers, may provide a method of reducing the known psychoactive effect of anandamide that limit its use in the clinic, whereas maintaining an antinociceptive effect. It will be necessary to use more specific CB1 receptor antagonists to dissect fully the role of the CB1 receptor on blood pressure.
|
Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
Footnotes |
|---|
ABBREVIATIONS: CGRP, calcitonin gene-related peptide; CB, cannabinoid; NO, nitric oxide; SNP, sodium nitroprusside; L-NAME, N
-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester; NOS, nitric-oxide synthase; nNOS, neuronal nitric oxide synthase; AM251, N-(piperin-1-yl)-5-(4-iodophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide; AM404, N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-52,82,112,142-eicosatetraenamide.
Address correspondence to: Professor P. J. Goadsby, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square London, WC1N 3BG UK. E-mail: peterg{at}ion.ucl.ac.uk
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Adams IB, Compton DR, and Martin BR (1998) Assessment of anandamide interaction with the cannabinoid brain receptor: SR 141716A antagonism studies in mice and autoradiographic analysis of receptor binding in rat brain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 284: 1209-1217.
Adams IB, Ryan W, Singer M, Thomas BF, Compton DR, Razdan RK, and Martin BR (1995) Evaluation of cannabinoid receptor binding and in vivo activities for anandamide analogs. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 273: 1172-1181.
Akerman S, Kaube H, and Goadsby PJ (2002a) The effect of anti-migraine compounds on nitric oxide induced dilation of dural meningeal vessels. Eur J Pharmacol 452: 223-228.[Medline]
Akerman S, Kaube H, and Goadsby PJ (2002b) Vanilloid receptor 1 (VR1) evoked CGRP release plays a minor role in causing dural vessel dilation via the trigeminovascular system. Cephalalgia 22: 572.
Akerman S, Kaube H, and Goadsby PJ (2003a) Anandamide shows both cannabinoid and vanilloid properties in an in vivo model of trigeminovascular mediated headpain. Cephalalgia 23: 646.
Akerman S, Kaube H, and Goadsby PJ (2003b) Vanilloid type 1 receptor (VR1) evoked CGRP release plays a minor role in causing dural vessel dilation via the trigeminovascular system. Br J Pharmacol 140: 718-724.[CrossRef][Medline]
Akerman S, Williamson DJ, Kaube H, and Goadsby PJ (2002c) Nitric oxide synthase inhibitors can antagonise neurogenic and calcitonin gene-related peptide induced dilation of dural meningeal vessels. Br J Pharmacol 137: 62-68.[CrossRef][Medline]
Castellano AE, Micieli G, Bellantonio P, Buzzi MG, Marcheselli S, Pompeo F, Rossi F, and Nappi G (1998) Indomethacin increases the effect of isosorbide dinitrate on cerebral hemodynamics in migraine patients: pathogenetic and therapeutic implications. Cephalalgia 18: 622-630.[Medline]
Caulfield MP and Brown DA (1992) Cannabinoid receptor agonists inhibit Ca current in NG108-15 neuroblastoma cells via a pertussis toxin-sensitive mechanism. Br J Pharmacol 106: 231-232.[Medline]
Chahl LA and Lynch AM (1987) The acute effects of capsaicin on the cardiovascular system. Acta Physiol Hung 69: 413-419.[Medline]
Coffey RG, Yamamoto Y, Snella E, and Pross S (1996) Tetrahydrocannabinol inhibition of macrophage nitric oxide production. Biochem Pharmacol 52: 743-751.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cupini LM, Bari M, Battista N, Argiro G, Agro AF, Calabresi P, and Maccarrone, MI (2003) Abnormal degradation of endocannabinoids in migrainous women. Cephalalgia 23: 684-685.
Dalsgaard-Nielsen T (1955) Migraine diagnostics with special references to pharmacological tests. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 7: 312-322.
Dewey WL (1986) Cannabinoid pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev 38: 151-178.[Abstract]
Egertová M and Elphick MR (2000) Localisation of cannabinoid receptors in the rat brain using antibodies to the intracellular C-terminal tail of CB. J Comp Neurol 422: 159-171.[CrossRef][Medline]
Flores CM, Leong AS, Dussor GO, Harding-Rose C, Hargreaves KM, and Kilo S (2001) Capsaicin-evoked CGRP release from rat buccal mucosa: development of a model system for studying trigeminal mechanisms of neurogenic inflammation. Eur J Neurosci 14: 1113-11120.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gebremedhin D, Lange AR, Campbell WB, Hillard CJ, and Harder DR (1999) Cannabinoid CB1 receptor of cat cerebral arterial muscle functions to inhibit L-type Ca2+ channel current. Am J Physiol 276: H2085-H2093.
Goadsby PJ, Edvinsson L, and Ekman R (1988) Release of vasoactive peptides in the extracerebral circulation of man and the cat during activation of the trigeminovascular system. Ann Neurol 23: 193-196.[CrossRef][Medline]
Goadsby PJ, Lipton RB, and Ferrari MD (2002) Migraine-current understanding and treatment. N Engl J Med 346: 257-270.
Guhring H, Hamza M, Sergejeva M, Ates M, Kotalla CE, Ledent C, and Brune K (2002) A role for endocannabinoids in indomethacin-induced spinal antinociception. Eur J Pharmacol 454: 153-163.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hillard CJ (2000) Endocannabinoids and vascular function. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 294: 27-32.
Hoehe MR, Caenazzo L, Martinez MM, Hsieh WT, Modi WS, Gershon ES, and Bonner TI (1991) Genetic and physical mapping of the human cannabinoid receptor gene to chromosome 6q14–q15. New Biol 3: 880-885.[Medline]
Iversen HK and Olesen J (1996) Headache induced by a nitric oxide donor (nitroglycerin) responds to sumatriptan - a human model for development of migraine drugs. Cephalalgia 16: 412-418.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lassen LH, Haderslev PA, Jacobsen VB, Iversen HK, Sperling B, and Olesen J (2002) CGRP may play a causative role in migraine. Cephalalgia 22: 54-61.[CrossRef][Medline]
Maggi CA, Santicioli P, Geppetti P, Patacchini R, Frilli S, Astolfi M, Fusco B, and Meli A (1988) Simultaneous release of substance P- and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-like immunoreactivity from isolated muscle of the guinea pig urinary bladder. Neurosci Lett 87: 163-167.[Medline]
Martling CR, Saria A, Fischer JA, Hokfelt T, and Lundberg JM (1988) Calcitonin gene-related peptide and the lung: neuronal coexistence with substance P, release by capsaicin and vasodilatory effect. Regulatory Peptides 20: 125-139.[CrossRef][Medline]
Matsuda LA, Lolait SJ, Brownstein MJ, Young AC, and Bonner TI (1990) Structure of a cannabinoid receptor and functional expression of the cloned cDNA. Nature (Lond) 346: 561-564.[CrossRef][Medline]
Olesen J, Diener HC, Husstedt I, Goadsby PJ, Hall D, Meier U, Pollentier S, and Lesko LM (2003) Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist BIBN4096BS is effective in the treatment of migraine attacks. Cephalalgia 23: 579.
Pan X, Ikeda SR, and Lewis DL (1998) SR 141716A acts as an inverse agonist to increase neuronal voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents by reversal of tonic CB1 cannabinoid receptor activity. Mol Pharmacol 54: 1064-1072.
Pestonjamasp VK and Burstein SH (1998) Anandamide synthesis is induced by arachidonate mobilizing agonists in cells of the immune system. Biochim Biophys Acta 2: 2-3.
Plane F, Holland M, Waldron GJ, Garland CJ, and Boyle JP (1997) Evidence that anandamide and EDHF act via different mechanisms in rat isolated mesenteric arteries. Br J Pharmacol 121: 1509-1511.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pratt PF, Hillard CJ, Edgemond WS, and Campbell WB (1998) N-Arachidonylethanolamide relaxation of bovine coronary artery is not mediated by CB1 cannabinoid receptor. Am J Physiol 274: H375-H381.
Russo E (1998) Cannabis for migraine treatment: the once and future prescription? An historical and scientific review. Pain 76: 3-8.[CrossRef][Medline]
Saito A and Goto K (1986) Depletion of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) by capsaicin in cerebral arteries. J Pharmacobiodyn 9: 613-619.[Medline]
Schnelle M, Grotenhermen F, Reif M, and Gorter RW (1999) [Results of a standardized survey on the medical use of cannabis products in the German-speaking area]. Forsch Komplementarmed 6: 28-36.
Shen YT, Pittman TJ, Buie PS, Bolduc DL, Kane SA, Koblan KS, Gould RJ, and Lynch JJ (2001) Functional role of alpha-calcitonin gene-related peptide in the regulation of the cardiovascular system. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 298: 551-558.
Smith PB, Compton DR, Welch SP, Razdan RK, Mechoulam R, and Martin BR (1994) The pharmacological activity of anandamide, a putative endogenous cannabinoid, in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 270: 219-227.
Stein EA, Fuller SA, Edgemond WS, and Campbell WB (1996) Physiological and behavioural effects of the endogenous cannabinoid, arachidonylethanolamide (anandamide), in the rat. Br J Pharmacol 119: 107-114.[CrossRef][Medline]
Thomsen LL, Kruuse C, Iversen HK, and Olesen J (1994) A nitric oxide donor (nitroglycerine) triggers genuine migraine attacks. Eur J Neurol 1: 73-80.
Tsou K, Brown S, Sanudo-Pena MC, Mackie K, and Walker JM (1998) Immunohistochemical distribution of cannabinoid CB1 receptors in the rat central nervous system. Neuroscience 83: 393-411.[CrossRef][Medline]
Uddman R and Edvinsson L (1989) Neuropeptides in the cerebral circulation. Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev 1: 230-252.[Medline]
Wagner JA, Varga K, Jarai Z, and Kunos G (1999) Mesenteric vasodilation mediated by endothelial anandamide receptors. Hypertension 33: 429-434.
Wei EP, Moskowitz MA, Boccalini P, and Kontos HA (1992) Calcitonin gene-related peptide mediates nitroglycerin and sodium nitroprusside-induced vasodilation in feline cerebral arterioles. Circ Res 70: 1313-1319.
Williamson DJ, Hargreaves RJ, Hill RG, and Shepheard SL (1997a) Intravital microscope studies on the effects of neurokinin agonists and calcitonin gene-related peptide on dural blood vessel diameter in the anaesthetized rat. Cephalalgia 17: 518-524.[CrossRef][Medline]
Williamson DJ, Hargreaves RJ, Hill RG, and Shepheard SL (1997b) Sumatriptan inhibits neurogenic vasodilation of dural blood vessels in the anaesthetized rat - intravital microscope studies. Cephalalgia 17: 525-531.[CrossRef][Medline]
Williamson DJ, Shepheard SL, Cook DA, Hargreaves RJ, Hill RG, and Cumberbatch MJ (2001) Role of opioid receptors in neurogenic dural vasodilation and sensitization of trigeminal neurones in anaesthetized rats. Br J Pharmacol 133: 807-814.[CrossRef][Medline]
Williamson DJ, Shepheard SL, Hill RG, and Hargreaves RJ (1997c) The novel anti-migraine agent rizatriptan inhibits neurogenic dural vasodilation and extravasation. Eur J Pharmacol 328: 61-64.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zygmunt PM, Petersson J, Andersson DA, Chuang H, Sorgard M, Di Marzo V, Julius D, and Hogestatt ED (1999) Vanilloid receptors on sensory nerves mediate the vasodilator action of anandamide. Nature (Lond) 400: 452-457.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Akerman, P. R. Holland, and P. J. Goadsby Cannabinoid (CB1) Receptor Activation Inhibits Trigeminovascular Neurons J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2007; 320(1): 64 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Dinis, A. Charrua, A. Avelino, M. Yaqoob, S. Bevan, I. Nagy, and F. Cruz Anandamide-Evoked Activation of Vanilloid Receptor 1 Contributes to the Development of Bladder Hyperreflexia and Nociceptive Transmission to Spinal Dorsal Horn Neurons in Cystitis J. Neurosci., December 15, 2004; 24(50): 11253 - 11263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
