JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics Fast Forward
First published on April 8, 2009; DOI: 10.1124/jpet.108.149955


0022-3565/09/3301-304-315$20.00
JPET 330:304-315, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.108.149955v1
330/1/304    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, F.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, Y.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, F.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, Y.

METABOLISM, TRANSPORT, AND PHARMACOGENOMICS

What Are Next Generation Innovative Therapeutic Targets? Clues from Genetic, Structural, Physicochemical, and Systems Profiles of Successful TargetsFormula

Feng Zhu, LianYi Han, ChanJuan Zheng, Bin Xie, Martti T. Tammi, ShengYong Yang, YuQuan Wei, and YuZong Chen

Bioinformatics and Drug Design Group, Center for Computational Science and Engineering, Departments of Pharmacy (F.Z., L.Y.H., C.J.Z., B.X., Y.Z.C.) and Biological Science (M.T.T.), National University of Singapore, Singapore; and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China (S.Y.Y., Y.Q.W., Y.Z.C.)

Low target discovery rate has been linked to inadequate consideration of multiple factors that collectively contribute to druggability. These factors include sequence, structural, physicochemical, and systems profiles. Methods individually exploring each of these profiles for target identification have been developed, but they have not been collectively used. We evaluated the collective capability of these methods in identifying promising targets from 1019 research targets based on the multiple profiles of up to 348 successful targets. The collective method combining at least three profiles identified 50, 25, 10, and 4% of the 30, 84, 41, and 864 phase III, II, I, and nonclinical trial targets as promising, including eight to nine targets of positive phase III results. This method dropped 89% of the 19 discontinued clinical trial targets and 97% of the 65 targets failed in high-throughput screening or knockout studies. Collective consideration of multiple profiles demonstrated promising potential in identifying innovative targets.


Received for publication December 16, 2008
Accepted April 7, 2009.

Address correspondence to: Prof. YuZong Chen, Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, 18 Science Dr. 4, Singapore 117543. E-mail: phacyz{at}nus.edu.sg.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.