JPET Assistant Professor of Medicine (Clinician-Educator)

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Freeman, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Turner, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Freeman, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Turner, R. J.

The effects of l-propranolol and practolol on atrial and nodal transmembrane potentials

SE Freeman and RJ Turner

Effects of l-propranolol, racemic propranolol and practolol have been determined on transmembrane potentials recorded in guinea-pig left atrium and in sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodes of the rabbit heart. In addition to the voltage -time recording of the action potential, its first time derivative was displayed as a function of membrane voltage, forming a phase-plane trajectory. A number of parameters of the action potential were determined from this trajectory. At the concentrations used the beta adrenoceptor blocking agents reduced the maximum rate of rise of the atrial action potential and slowed repolarization. The velocity of the propagated spike was reduced, and the maximum ionic conductance was also reduced. The excitation potential of the propagated spike was unaffected. The membrane effects were markedly dependent on the frequency of stimulation. The beta adrenoceptor blocking agents were without effect on either the sinoatrial or atrioventricular nodes. Since the spontaneously active right atrium beats more slowly than the heart of the intact rabbit, the atrioventricular node was electrically stimulated at 5 to 6 Hz. Neither drug affected the ability of the node to follow these stimulation frequencies. The importance of these effects in the control of cardiac arrhythmias is discussed.

Volume 195, Issue 1, pp. 133-139, 10/01/1975
Copyright © 1975 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1975 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.