1. We have compared the receptors mediating the contractions of rings of rat thoracic aorta or rabbit pulmonary artery and rat stomach strips in response to the endothelin/sarafotoxin (ET/SX) family of peptides and to those mediating endothelium-dependent vasodilations within the isolated perfused mesentery of the rat. To discriminate ETA receptors from ETB receptors we have used the criteria that ET-1 is more active than SX6c on ETA receptors, and that the ET/SX peptides are equiactive on ETB receptors. We have also assessed the effects of the ETA receptor-selective antagonist BQ-123, and the non-selective ET receptor antagonist PD 142893 on the responses of each preparation to the ET/SX peptides. 2. ET-1-induced constrictions of the rat thoracic aorta (EC50 3 x 10(-10) M), a prototypic ETA receptor-mediated response, or isolated perfused mesentery of the rat were antagonized by BQ-123 (10(-5) M) or PD 142893 (10(-5) M). SX6c did not constrict either the rat isolated perfused mesentery or the rat thoracic aorta. Thus, ETA receptors mediate these constrictions. 3. ET-1 and SX6c were approximately equipotent in constricting rabbit pulmonary artery rings (EC50S 3-6 x 10(-10) M). Neither BQ-123 (10(-5) M) nor PD 142893 antagonized the contractions induced by ET-1. These effects suggest mediation by ETB receptors but PD 142893 (10(-5) M) did give a 3 fold antagonism of constrictions induced by SX6c. 4. SX6c was more potent than ET-1 in contracting the rat stomach strip (threshold concentrations 10(-10) and 3 x 10(-10) M). Contractions to ET-1 or SX6c were unaffected by BQ-123 (10-5 M), again indicative of ETB receptor-mediated events. PD 142893 (10-5 M) was ineffective against ET-1 but produced a 3 fold antagonism of SX6c.5. In the rat isolated perfused mesentery ET-1 or SX6c (0.3-300pmol) were equipotent in producing dose-related vasodilatations that were unaffected by BQ-123 (10-6 M), indicative of an ETB receptor mediated response. In contrast to the other ETB-mediated responses, PD 142893 (10-6 M) strongly antagonized these vasodilatations.6. Thus, ETA receptors mediate constrictions of the rat thoracic aorta and rat isolated perfused mesentery whereas ETB receptors mediate constrictions of the rabbit pulmonary artery and rat stomach strip and endothelium-dependent dilatations within the mesentery. However, within the group of ETB receptor-mediated responses, endothelium-dependent vasodilatations are sensitive to PD 142893, whereas contractions of the isolated smooth muscle preparations are not. Thus, the receptor present on the endothelium responsible for the release of nitric oxide in response to the ET/SX peptides is most probably different from that present on smooth muscle that mediates BQ-123-insensitive contractions.