Newer antiplatelet agents in acute coronary syndromes

https://doi.org/10.1053/hj.1999.v138.a102298Get rights and content

Abstract

Aspirin is accepted as standard therapy in the management of acute coronary syndromes, but has significant limitations, including intolerance, allergy, resistance, peptic ulceration, and intracranial hemorrhage. Recent trials involving approximately 18,000 patients with unstable angina have investigated the efficacy and safety of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists, which block the final common pathway of platelet aggregation. The Platelet Receptor Inhibition in Ischemic Syndrome Management (PRISM) trial compared tirofiban with heparin and found a 33% reduction in the composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, or refractory ischemia at 48 hours. In the Platelet Receptor Inhibition in Ischemic Syndrome Management in Patients Limited by Unstable Signs and Symptoms (PRISM-PLUS) trial, patients were randomly assigned to receive either heparin, tirofiban, or both. At 7 days, the patients who had received heparin and tirofiban had a 34% lower incidence of the composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, or refractory ischemia than those treated with heparin alone. The Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy (PURSUIT) trial randomly assigned patients to receive either eptifibatide or placebo. At 30 days, the rate of death or myocardial infarction was reduced by 9.6% in the eptifibatide group compared with the placebo group. In the Platelet IIb/IIIa Antagonism for the Reduction of Acute Coronary Syndrome Events in a Global Organization Network (PARAGON) trial, patients were randomly assigned to receive either low- or high-dose lamifiban with or without heparin, or heparin alone. There were no differences between the treatment groups at 30 days, but at 6 months the patients randomly assigned to receive low-dose lamifiban had a 23% lower incidence of death or myocardial infarction, perhaps because of long-term passivation of the plaque. Overall, IIb/IIIa antagonists have been shown to be safe and beneficial in patients with unstable angina, particularly during the infusion period. However, there remain a number of unanswered questions concerning treatment with these agents, such as the appropriate dosing regimens and the safety and efficacy of combining intravenous antiplatelet therapy with other agents such as low-molecular-weight heparin, thrombolytic agents, and oral agents. (Am Heart J 1999;138:S570-S576.)

Section snippets

PRISM

The PRISM trial18 compared tirofiban (Aggrastat), a small, selective IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist, with heparin in the treatment of patients with unstable angina. The 3232 patients enrolled in PRISM had low- to intermediate-risk profiles,21 with 75% exhibiting electrocardiographic changes and 32% ST-segment depression. Patients were randomly assigned up to 24 hours after their last ischemic event to receive either tirofiban (0.6 μg/kg/min for 30 minutes followed by 0.15 μg/kg/min) or heparin

PRISM-PLUS

The aim of the PRISM-PLUS trial was to determine the clinical efficacy of tirofiban as part of a comprehensive strategy to prevent acute ischemic events in patients with unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction.19 A total of 1915 patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to 1 of 3 treatment arms consisting of tirofiban alone, tirofiban plus heparin, or heparin alone. All patients received aspirin unless it was contraindicated. The patient population in PRISM-PLUS was

PURSUIT

In the PURSUIT trial,20 eptifibatide (Integrilin), a synthetic cyclic heptapeptide with selective high affinity for the IIb/IIIa receptor, was compared with placebo for the acute treatment of unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. The trial enrolled 10,948 patients who had had an episode of acute chest pain (with electrocardiographic changes or increased creatine kinase MB level) during the previous 24 hours was studied. This trial was an intermediate-risk study, with

PARAGON

The objective of the PARAGON study17 was to test the benefit of different doses of lamifiban, a nonpeptide IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist, alone and in combination with heparin in patients with unstable angina or nonQ-wave myocardial infarction, in order to select the most promising lamifiban regimen for subsequent evaluation. The study population consisted of 2282 patients from 273 hospitals in 20 countries. All patients received aspirin and were randomly assigned to receive either low-dose

Future directions

These drugs have clearly been shown to be beneficial in reducing myocardial infarction in patients with unstable angina, particularly during the infusion. A number of questions remain concerning intravenous therapy. Which patients should be targeted? What should the target be for platelet inhibition? For how long should the infusion be continued? Does low-molecular-weight heparin add to the benefit, and is this combination safe? How should an invasive strategy be integrated?

The coupling of

References (23)

  • The RISC Group

    Risk of myocardial infarction and death during treatment with low dose aspirin and intravenous heparin in men with unstable coronary artery disease

    Lancet

    (1990)
  • KH Grotemeyer et al.

    Two-year follow-up of aspirin responder and aspirin non responder: a pilot-study including 180 post-stroke patients

    Thromb Res

    (1993)
  • CH Hennekens et al.

    A randomized trial of aspirin and beta-carotene among U.S. physicians

    Prev Med

    (1985)
  • ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group

    Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2

    Lancet

    (1988)
  • HD Lewis et al.

    Protective effects of aspirin against acute myocardial infarction and death in men with unstable angina: results of a Veterans Administration cooperative study

    N Engl J Med

    (1983)
  • Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration

    Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy. I: prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke by prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of patients

    BMJ

    (1994)
  • PM Ridker et al.

    Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men

    N Engl J Med

    (1997)
  • PJ Roderick et al.

    The gastrointestinal toxicity of aspirin: an overview of randomised controlled trials

    Br J Clin Pharmacol

    (1993)
  • The EPIC Investigators

    Use of a monoclonal antibody directed against the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor in high-risk coronary angioplasty

    N Engl J Med

    (1994)
  • The EPILOG Investigators

    Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade and low-dose heparin during percutaneous coronary revascularization

    N Engl J Med

    (1997)
  • The CAPTURE Investigators

    Randomised placebo-controlled trial of abciximab before and during coronary intervention in refractory unstable angina: the CAPTURE study

    Lancet

    (1997)
  • Cited by (14)

    • Synthesis and anti-platelet activity of novel arylsulfonate-acylhydrazone derivatives, designed as antithrombotic candidates

      2008, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      This compound can be obtained by regioselective aromatic electrophilic substitution at the C-6 position of 3,4-methylenedioxytoluene (6), which was obtained in ca. 50% overall yield from natural safrole (5), an abundant natural product [12,13]. As previously described [10], simple distillation of sassafras oil generates 5 in 85% yield. Basic catalyzed isomerization of the double bond followed by oxidative cleavage and Wolff–Kishner reduction gave 6 in appropriated yield.

    • Medical therapy of unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction

      2000, American Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin for >1 week was no better than placebo, but was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding.45 Platelet receptor blockers represent a therapeutic breakthrough.47–49 The IIb/IIIa agents interfere with the final common pathway of platelet aggregation and act at multiple sites of receptor-ligand binding, including fibrinogen and von Willebrand factor and other compounds that result in platelet adherence and the subsequent development of a platelet plug or platelet-fibrin rich thrombus.

    • A preliminary investigation of Mesoionic Xanthine analogues as inhibitors of platelet aggregation

      2000, Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Ischemic stroke resulting from the transient or permanent reduction in cerebral blood is in most cases caused by the occlusion of a cerebral artery by either embolism or local thrombosis. The utility of anti-platelet agents in the treatment of cardiovascular disorders and stroke has recently been reviewed.1 A large number of agents such as papaverine2 and the methyl xanthine derivatives theophylline (1) and 1-isobutyl-3-methylxanthine (IBMX; 2) inhibit platelet aggregation through their activity as phosphodiesterase inhibitors.3,4

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text