Elsevier

Vaccine

Volume 28, Issue 47, 3 November 2010, Pages 7483-7491
Vaccine

DNA vaccine delivery by densely-packed and short microprojection arrays to skin protects against vaginal HSV-2 challenge

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.09.014Get rights and content

Abstract

There is an unmet medical need for a prophylactic vaccine against herpes simplex virus (HSV). DNA vaccines and cutaneous vaccination have been tried for many applications, but few reports combine this vaccine composition and administration route. We compared DNA administration using the Nanopatch™, a solid microprojection device coated with vaccine comprised of thousands of short (110 μm) densly-packed projections (70 μm spacing), to standard intramuscular DNA vaccination in a mouse model of vaginal HSV-2 infection. A dose-response relationship was established for immunogenicity and survival in both vaccination routes. Appropriate doses administered by Nanopatch™ were highly immunogenic and enabled mouse survival. Vaginal HSV-2 DNA copy number day 1 post challenge correlated with survival, indicating that vaccine-elicited acquired immune responses can act quickly and locally. Solid, short, densely-packed arrays of microprojections applied to the skin are thus a promising route of administration for DNA vaccines.

Introduction

Infections due to herpes simplex virus (HSV) cause significant individual and public health burden [1]. Currently approved antiviral drug regimens can reduce but not eliminate symptomatic reactivations, asymptomatic shedding, and transmission, and have no influence over chronic latent infection in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons [2]. For these reasons, considerable research effort focuses on prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines. The most advanced clinical candidate targets genital herpes due to HSV-2, and contains the extracellular domain of glycoprotein D of HSV-2 (gD2), administered intramuscularly with alum and a TLR4 agonist [3]. While HSV-2 is associated with genital herpes, and HSV-1 is more often associated with oral and ocular disease, evidence does exist for a substantial contribution of HSV-1 to clinical first episode of genital herpes. Moderate efficacy against HSV-2 infection and genital herpes disease was observed in phase III trials, but only in HSV-1/HSV-2 dually seronegative women. A replication study in this population is underway [4].

The rationale for gD2 as a vaccine antigen has been clear for almost 30 years, as anti-gD antibodies have potent neutralizing activity [5]. More recently, CD4 and CD8 epitopes in gD2 have also been defined [6], [7]. The amino acid sequences of gD1 and gD2 are highly homologous, as are the principle cellular receptors used by gD of HSV-1 and HSV-2 to facilitate viral entry [8], [9], [10]. Thus, an effective gD-based vaccine might thus provide cross-protection against both HSV-1 and HSV-2. HSV gD is a type I membrane protein with a single transmembrane domain. While full-length gD has been explored in animal models, most protein subunit development has used the extracellular domain to facilitate manufacturing in mammalian cell lines [1]. Candidate DNA vaccines reaching clinical trials have also encoded this portion of the molecule [11].

Intramuscular administration of plasmid DNA (pDNA) encoding an ORF or fragment of interest, with appropriate flanking sequences, will generate an integrated antibody and T-cell immune response. There are licensed veterinary DNA vaccines [12]. In contrast, immunogenicity in humans has generally been inadequate for clinical licensure [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]. Several approaches are being investigated to improve immunogenicity, including adjuvants, microparticle ballistic delivery to the skin, and cutaneous vaccine delivery using microprojections [19], [20]. The skin is rich in antigen presenting cells (APC) including several dendritic cell (DC) subsets. In fact, mobile DC are thought to transport HSV antigen to draining lymph nodes (DLN) during primary herpetic infections [21].

In this report, we investigate the tolerability, immunogenicity, and efficacy of a plasmid DNA vaccine encoding the extracellular domain of gD2, using the Nanopatch™, a recently devised silicon microprojection device [22], [23], [24]. To significantly increase direct cell targeting, the Nanopatch™ was designed with 3364 microprojections per device in a 4 × 4 mm area and tailored to directly target thousands of skin APCs. The projections are slender, with much of their length below the diameter of cells, such that they induce low stresses to target cells. They are thus likely to induce a low incidence of cell death near the tips [25].

Our standard mouse model of intravaginal inoculation with a virulent HSV-2 strain differs in important ways from human infection. However, it allows for measurement of IgG immune responses, vaginal HSV-2 replication, survival, and the establishment of viral latency in the DRG. We observed that low doses of gD2-encoding DNA, delivered cutaneously via Nanopatch™, were as immunogenic and as efficacious as higher delivered doses of the vaccine administered intramuscularly. Correlative studies determined that low vaginal HSV-2 replication and seroconversion were predictive of survival, and that high dose vaccines could prevent latent HSV-2 infection of DRG.

Section snippets

Mice

Wild type female Balb/cJ mice were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and used at 5–6 weeks of age. Mice were housed in specific pathogen free conditions. Protocols were approved by the University of Washington Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Vaccine constituents

The pVAX1 plasmid (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was used as negative control. pVAX1-gD21-340 was obtained by PCR-cloning the HSV-2 US6 (gD2) gene, predicted to encode amino acids 1–340, from a clinical strain (PCR primer

gD21-340 DNA vaccine delivered by Nanopatch™ is immunogenic

To examine transcutaneous DNA vaccine delivery, we performed a series of experiments comparing vaccine delivery by the Nanopatch™ vs. intramuscular (IM) administration (Table 1 and Fig. 1). We measured total serum binding IgG using a highly homologous antigen, gD121-339 [8], [27].

We compared the proportion of animals that seroconverted by routes of administration and vaccine dose (Table 2). At each time point analyzed, the rates of seroconversion were dependent on the dose of the vaccine (p < 

Discussion

DNA vaccines encoding HSV gD have been investigated for at least 14 years [33], [34], [35], [36]. With an adequate vaccine mass and number of doses, mouse and guinea pig models generally demonstrate immunogenicity and beneficial effects on survival. The myriad animal and viral strains, routes of inoculation, and vaccine compositions that have been used preclude a complete review. Within this context, the novel findings of this report concern the cutaneous administration of DNA encoding a

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Derek Jenkins, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, United Kingdom, for fabricating the Nanopatches, Michael Crichtom, Alex Ansaldo, and Simon Corrie for their support of Nanopatch™ research, Sally Yukiko for coating Nanopatches, Tarl Prow, Germain Fernando, Kristin Raphaelli, Cindy Tan, and Anthony Raphael for DNA preparation, lab support and expert opinions, and Kai Wilhelm for assistance in vaccination studies. Funding was provided by PATH, the Australian Research Council, the

References (48)

  • N. Bourne et al.

    DNA immunization confers protective immunity on mice challenged intravaginally with herpes simplex virus type 2

    Vaccine

    (1996 Sep)
  • P.H. Nass et al.

    Protective immunity against herpes simplex virus generated by DNA vaccination compared to natural infection

    Vaccine

    (2001 Jan)
  • J.I. Sin et al.

    LFA-3 plasmid DNA enhances Ag-specific humoral- and cellular-mediated protective immunity against herpes simplex virus-2 in vivo: involvement of CD4+ T cells in protection

    Cell Immunol

    (2000 Jul)
  • S.A. Frech et al.

    Use of a patch containing heat-labile toxin from Escherichia coli against travellers’ diarrhoea: a phase II, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled field trial

    Lancet

    (2008 Jun)
  • Y. Ishii et al.

    A transcutaneous vaccination system using a hydrogel patch for viral and bacterial infection

    J Control Release

    (2008 Oct 21)
  • H. Ghiasi et al.

    Vaccination with a cocktail of seven recombinantly expressed HSV-1 glycoproteins protects against ocular HSV-1 challenge more efficiently than vaccination with any individual glycoprotein

    Vaccine

    (1996 Feb)
  • D.M. Koelle et al.

    Herpes simplex: insights on pathogenesis and possible vaccines

    Annu Rev Med

    (2008)
  • L. Corey et al.

    Once-daily valacyclovir to reduce the risk of transmission of genital herpes

    N Engl J Med

    (2004 Jan)
  • L.R. Stanberry et al.

    Glycoprotein-D-adjuvant vaccine to prevent genital herpes

    N Engl J Med

    (2002 Nov)
  • N. Balachandran et al.

    Protection against lethal challenge of BALB/c mice by passive transfer of monoclonal antibodies to five glycoproteins of herpes simplex virus type 2

    Infect Immun

    (1982 Sep)
  • M. Kim et al.

    Immunodominant epitopes in herpes simplex virus type 2 glycoprotein D are recognized by CD4 lymphocytes from both HSV-1 and HSV-2 seropositive subjects

    J Immunol

    (2008 Nov)
  • D.M. Koelle et al.

    Immunodominance among herpes simplex virus-specific CD8 T cells expressing a tissue-specific homing receptor

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2003 Oct)
  • A. Dolan et al.

    The genome sequence of herpes simplex virus type 2

    J Virol

    (1998 Mar)
  • D.J. McGeoch et al.

    Complete DNA sequence of the short repeat region in the genome of herpes simplex virus type 1

    Nucleic Acids Res

    (1986 Feb)
  • Cited by (57)

    • Nanopatches for Vaccine Delivery

      2017, Micro- and Nanotechnology in Vaccine Development
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These people contributed equally to this work.

    View full text