Elsevier

Psychoneuroendocrinology

Volume 35, Issue 8, September 2010, Pages 1265-1269
Psychoneuroendocrinology

Short communication
Estrogenic regulation of limbic cannabinoid receptor binding

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.02.008Get rights and content

Summary

Sex differences have been identified in many of the behavioral and physiological effects of cannabinoids. While estrogen has been linked to some of these variations, the effects of estrogen on cannabinoid receptor binding have not been characterized within regions of the brain specifically implicated in stress responsivity and emotional behavior. To examine sex differences, and the role of estradiol, in regulation of the cannabinoid receptor, we compared the binding site density of the cannabinoid receptor within the amygdala, hippocampus and hypothalamus in males, cycling females, ovariectomized (OVX) females and estradiol-treated OVX females (OVX + E). Our data reveal that males and OVX females have higher amounts of hypothalamic and lower amounts of amygdalar cannabinoid receptor binding relative to both cycling females and OVX + E females. Within the hippocampus, ovariectomy resulted in an upregulation of cannabinoid receptor binding. These data provide a putative biochemical mechanism mediating the observed behavioral and physiological sex differences in the effects of cannabinoids, particularly with respect to stress and emotional behavior.

Introduction

The neuronal endocannabinoid system, which was first characterized as the neural system mediating the psychoactive effects of cannabis, is a neuromodulatory system which regulates a wide range of physiological and behavioral functions. The neuronal cannabinoid system is comprised of G-protein coupled receptors (CB1 receptors) and the endogenous arachidonate-derived ligands anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG).

A number of sex differences have been reported in the behavioral and physiological effects of cannabinoids. For example, CB1 receptor agonists are more potent in females than males with respect to antinociception and reduced locomotor activity, but are more potent in males at stimulating food intake and increasing body weight (Diaz et al., 2009, Rubino et al., 2008, Tseng and Craft, 2001). Females have been found to self-administer cannabinoids at higher rates than males (Fattore et al., 2007). In both rodents and humans, females are more sensitive than males to the anxiogenic effects of cannabinoids (Marco et al., 2006, Willianson and Evans, 2000). Consistent with this, females are more sensitive than males to the adverse effects of escalating THC exposure during adolescence on emotional behavior and stress reactivity in adulthood (Rubino et al., 2008). Completely opposite effects have been seen in sexual behavior such that cannabinoids facilitate female but impair male sexual activity (Gorzalka et al., in press).

Differences in the profile of gonadal hormones in males and females could underlie sex differences in the effects of cannabinoids. In particular, the observed sex differences in potency and sensitivity to CB1 receptor agonists could result if steroid hormones differentially regulate cannabinoid receptor expression or sensitivity to ligands. In support of this possibility, several responses to exogenously administered cannabinoids have been found to be dependent on levels of circulating estrogens (Anakari et al., 2008, Craft and Leiti, 2008). In addition, the higher rate of cannabinoid self-administration in females compared to males is reduced following ovariectomy (Fattore et al., 2007). Furthermore, cannabinoid influences on glutamatergic and GABAergic neuronal circuits are highly susceptible to modulation by estradiol (Nguyen and Wagner, 2006) and a recent report has demonstrated that protein levels of the CB1 receptor are significantly lower in females relative to males (Reich et al., 2009).

With respect to the CB1 receptor, CB1 receptor mRNA transcript amounts fluctuate throughout the estrous cycle and respond to estradiol treatment in ovariectomized females (González et al., 2000) and the estradiol responsiveness of CB1 receptor binding has been examined at the level of the forebrain (Rodríguez de Fonseca et al., 1994, Bonnin et al., 1993). However, the influences of sex and gonadal hormones on the density of cannabinoid receptors within distinct regions in the limbic system involved in emotionality and cognition has not been examined.

Section snippets

Subjects

Female and male Sprague–Dawley rats (Charles River, Montreal, Canada) weighing between 300 and 400 g were used in this study. All animals were pair housed in standard plastic maternity bins lined with contact bedding and had unrestricted access to tap water and Purina Rat Chow. The animals were kept in colony rooms with a constant temperature of 21 ± 1 °C and on a reverse 12:12 h light and dark cycle with lights turned off at 09:00 h. Following arrival, animals undergoing surgery were allowed to

Results

Within the hypothalamus there was a significant effect of treatment on the maximal binding (Bmax) of 3H-CP55940 to the cannabinoid receptor [F(3, 18) = 7.18, p < 0.005: Fig. 1]. Post hoc analysis demonstrated that both males and OVX females exhibited higher levels of cannabinoid receptor binding than either intact females or OVX + E females (all p's < 0.05 for these comparisons). With respect to binding affinity (Kd) of 3H-CP55940 for the cannabinoid receptor, there was a main effect of treatment [F(3,

Discussion

Our goal in these studies was to test the global hypothesis that differences in cannabinoid receptor function contribute to sex differences in behavioral and physiological responses to exogenous cannabinoids. We tested the specific hypothesis that estradiol affects the expression and/or binding affinity of the cannabinoid receptor in three brain regions within the limbic circuit. Cannabinoid receptor binding parameters were compared in intact male and female rats; and in female rats following

Role of the funding sources

This research was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) grants to BBG and National Institute of Health (NIH) grants DA022439 and DA09155 to CJH. MNH is supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from CIHR and TTL is the recipient of a CIHR graduate fellowship. The CIHR, NSERC and NIH had no further role in study design nor in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Amy Sasman for her technical assistance with these experiments.

Contributors: Ms. Riebe conducted the surgical procedures and ran the receptor binding assays for this study and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. Dr. Hill proposed the rationale for this study, performed the tissue dissections, assisted with statistical analysis and interpretation and edited manuscript. Ms. Lee assisted with the surgical procedures, assisted with the receptor binding assay

References (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (106)

  • Mechanisms of cannabinoid tolerance

    2023, Biochemical Pharmacology
  • Age-dependent effects of estradiol on temporal memory: A role for the type 1 cannabinoid receptor?

    2023, Psychoneuroendocrinology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Accordingly, the levels of CB1-R mRNA transcript fluctuate throughout the estrous cycle and respond to E2 treatment in ovariectomized females (González et al., 2000). Moreover, estrogens affect CB1-R binding capacities (Riebe et al., 2010; Rodríguez de Fonseca et al., 1994) and/or protein contents in several brain regions, including the hippocampus (Reich et al., 2009). These E2-ECS interactions are endowed with behavioral consequences, as shown for E2-CB1-R interactions in the nucleus accumbens and in the prefrontal cortex where they impact cocaine sensitization and reinstatement in female rats (Doncheck et al., 2018; Peterson et al., 2016).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text