The effect of buprenorphine and benzodiazepines on respiration in the rat
Introduction
Since the introduction of buprenorphine as a substitution therapy in the treatment of opioid dependence its benefits and effectiveness have been widely documented (Johnson et al., 1992, Kosten et al., 1993, Strain et al., 1994, Ling et al., 1996, Ling et al., 1998, Schottenfeld et al., 1997, West et al., 2000, Barnett et al., 2001). The advantages of buprenorphine are both in its unique pharmacology as well as becoming another treatment option alongside methadone. Buprenorphine, being a partial agonist at the μ opioid receptor, has been demonstrated to have a low ability to produce respiratory depression (Walsh et al., 1994). For this reason it is considered safer than a full opioid agonist such as methadone. Unfortunately, there have been a series of buprenorphine-related deaths in France (Reynaud et al., 1998, Tracqui et al., 1998b, Gaulier et al., 2000, Kintz, 2001, Kintz, 2002). Benzodiazepines, a highly abused class of prescription medication have also been implicated in the majority of these deaths, with benzodiazepine use frequently being reported in this population (Thirion et al., 2001, Darke et al., 2003). Prior to this, the interaction between buprenorphine and benzodiazepines causing respiratory depression in a peri-operative setting had also been well documented (Faroqui et al., 1983, Forrest, 1983, Sekar and Mimpriss, 1987, Thorn et al., 1988, Jain and Shah, 1993). While there is anecdotal evidence suggesting an interaction exists between buprenorphine and benzodiazepines, whether the interaction is potentially more dangerous than the effect of methadone and benzodiazepines has not been evaluated.
Opioid receptors have a high density within the brain stem, the region of the brain involved in control of respiration (Wamsley, 1983). The ability of opioids to cause severe respiratory depression is attributed to this. Only a small number of benzodiazepines receptors are located in the medulla hence benzodiazepines on their own have a limited effect on respiration (Study and Barker, 1982). The exact mechanism of the interaction between opioids and benzodiazepines is not known.
Research with methadone and diazepam in rats, using methadone 5 mg/kg and diazepam 20 mg/kg in both acute and chronic dosing paradigms has established that the most severe respiratory depression occurs when a subject is naïve to both opiates and benzodiazepines. Tolerance develops to the respiratory depression induced by both methadone and diazepam (McCormick et al., 1984). In contrast to the reduction in respiration seen with methadone, high doses of buprenorphine have been reported to have no significant effect on arterial blood gases in the rat (Gueye et al., 2001), however when combined with midazolam the combination depressed ventilation (Gueye et al., 2002b). In opioid naïve rats flunitrazepam was found to cause a six-fold reduction in the median lethal dose (MLD) of buprenorphine while combined with methadone, flunitrazepam only caused a two-fold reduction in the methadone MLD (Borron et al., 2002).
The aim of this study is to evaluate the respiratory depressant effect of methadone and buprenorphine alone and in combination with diazepam in order to characterise and compare the interaction to gain an understanding of whether buprenorphine or methadone appears to be more toxic in combination with benzodiazepines.
Section snippets
Animals and housing
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (Victorian College of Pharmacy Animal House, Parkville, Australia) weighing between 240 and 350 g were used. Prior to surgery they were housed in the Victorian College of Pharmacy animal house in group cages at 22 °C with a 12 h light–dark cycle. Food and water were available ad libitum until the time of experimentation. After surgery rats were kept in individual cages until experimentation was completed.
Surgery
Rats were implanted with permanent polyethylene (PE50) catheters in
Effect of opioid administration on arterial pCO2
There was no significant difference in baseline levels of arterial pCO2 in any of the treatment groups or controls (data not shown). Methadone administration resulted in a dose-dependent increase in arterial pCO2, with the peak effect at 15 min and returning to baseline during the 4 h observation period. The methadone-induced increase in pCO2 compared to control was significant at 0.3 and 1 mg/kg methadone, F(3,24) = 9.757, P = 0.0002 (n = 6, p < 0.0001, Fig. 1a). t = 3.317 and 4.105; P < 0.05 and P < 0.01,
Discussion
The results of the present study indicate that acutely administered methadone and buprenorphine both depress respiration. Although pretreatment with diazepam removes the inverted u-shape from the buprenorphine dose response curve, in combination with diazepam buprenorphine's toxicity does not appear to be greater than that of methadone.
Acute administration of methadone resulted in dose-dependent changes in the parameters indicative of depression of respiration. The maximum effect was seen at 15
References (50)
- et al.
Acute central respiratory effects of diazepam, its solvent and propylene glycol
Br. J. Anaesth.
(1982) - et al.
Fatal methadone toxicity: signs and circumstances, and the role of benzodiazepines
Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health
(2002) - et al.
Methadone-related deaths in Western Australia 1993–99
Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health
(2002) Deaths involving buprenorphine: a compendium of French cases
Forensic Sci. Int.
(2001)A new series of 13 buprenorphine-related deaths
Clin. Biochem.
(2002)- et al.
Buprenorphine prescription by general practitioners in a French region
Drug Alcohol Depend.
(2002) - et al.
Prolonged respiratory depression caused by sublingual buprenorphine
Lancet
(1988) - et al.
Practice-based buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT): how do French healthcare providers manage the opiate-addicted patients?
J. Subst. Abuse Treat.
(2001) - et al.
A meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness of buprenorphine and methadone
J. Subst. Abuse
(2000) - et al.
Deaths attributable to methadone vs buprenorphine in France
JAMA
(2001)