Cyclodextrins in ophthalmic drug delivery

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(98)00055-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Most ocular diseases are treated by topical drug application in the form of aqueous eye drop solutions. Recent studies have shown that cyclodextrins are useful additives in ophthalmic formulations for increasing the aqueous solubility, aqueous stability and bioavailability of ophthalmic drugs, and to decrease drug irritation. However, these studies have also shown that there are some basic differences between ophthalmic administration of cyclodextrins and administration of cyclodextrins via other routes. These differences have induced some limitations in the ophthalmic application of these most recently developed pharmaceutical excipients. The objective of this review is to summarize recent findings and applications of various cyclodextrins in ophthalmic drug delivery. Their mechanism of action in aqueous eye drop formulations is also discussed. Finally, the formulation of a couple of cyclodextrin containing eye drop solutions is described.

Introduction

Drugs used in ophthalmology are either administered systematically (e.g. by oral route) or locally to the eye. Usually local drug administration is preferred, and then in the form of topically applied low viscosity aqueous eye drop solutions. Other topically applied drug formulations, such as suspensions, oily drops, gels, ointments and solid inserts, have also been used but most of these formulations give rise to unwanted side-effects (e.g. eye irritation and blurred vision) [1].

Cyclodextrins (CDs) are a group of cyclic oligosaccharides which have been shown to improve physicochemical properties of many drugs through formation of inclusion complexes. In drug development, CDs have mainly been used to increase the aqueous solubility and stability of poorly water-soluble drugs. CD complexation of lipophilic drugs has also been shown to increase drug bioavailability. Frequently, this has been attributed to the increased solubility or dissolution rate of the complexed material [2], but sometimes increased drug bioavailability has been associated with interactions of CDs with biological membranes. Most studies on CDs and their pharmaceutical applications have dealt with oral and parenteral drug delivery. Relatively little attention has been paid to the use of CDs in ophthalmic drug delivery. However, both advantages and disadvantages of CD incorporation into ophthalmic drug formulations have gained considerable interest. Ophthalmic applications of CDs have previously been reviewed 1, 2, 3, 4. Following is a review of application of CDs in topical drug delivery to the eye with emphasis on the mode of CD action in aqueous ophthalmic drug formulations.

Section snippets

Topical drug delivery to the eye

Topical delivery of eye drops, suspensions or ointments into the lower cul-de-sac is the most common method of drug treatment in ocular diseases and diagnostics. In general, the site of action of ophthalmic drugs is located inside the eye. Unfortunately, after instillation of an eye-drop, typically less than 5% of an applied dose reaches the intraocular tissues. The main reason of this low ocular drug availability is poor drug penetration across the cornea barrier and a rapid loss of the

Toxicological considerations

The safety profiles of the three most common natural CDs and some of their derivatives have recently been reviewed 37, 38. In general, the natural CDs and their hydrophilic derivatives are only able to permeate lipophilic biological membranes, such as the eye cornea, with considerable difficulty. Even the somewhat lipophilic randomly methylated β-cyclodextrin (RM-β-CD) does not readily permeate lipophilic membranes, although it interacts more readily with the membranes than the hydrophilic CD

Cyclodextrins and ocular drug delivery

In general, the ocular bioavailability of topically applied drugs is very low, frequently less than 5% 50, 51. The main ocular barrier to drug permeability into the eye consist of lipophilic membranes (i.e. cornea, conjunctiva and sclera) but the membrane exterior consist of aqueous tear fluid and a hydrophilic mucin layer at the membrane surface. The drug molecule must be somewhat hydrophilic (i.e. water-soluble) to be able to permeate through this aqueous exterior of the eye surface but, at

Cyclodextrins as anti-irritants

Eye drops are commonly dosed at high drug concentrations, directly on the corneal surface and thus, it is not surprising that ophthalmic irritation is a common drawback in ophthalmic drug development and in their clinical use. Ophthalmic irritation may decrease patient compliance or in the case of a strong irritation, may even be a reason for patients to stop their medication. In principal, CDs may decrease the irritation of ophthalmic drugs by formation of inclusion complexes, thereby masking

Cyclodextrin stabilisation of drugs in aqueous ophthalmic formulations

The most common dosage form for topical ocular administration is the aqueous eye drop solution, which is easy to use, relatively inexpensive and does not impair vision. However, in aqueous solution, most drugs are subject to chemical degradation. The consequence of drug degradation is a decrease of drug potency and the formation of degradation products which may be harmful. Drug stability in eye drop solutions has traditionally been increased by appropriate adjustment of pH and storage

The effects of polymers on cyclodextrin complexation and the availability of drugs in cyclodextrin complexes

For a variety of reasons, including toxicological considerations, isotonicity adjustments, drug bioavailability and production cost, it is important to include as little CD as possible in ophthalmic drug formulations. Even at optimum CD concentration the drug bioavailability can be inadequate resulting in less than optimal drug delivery. Addition of small amount of water-soluble polymer to aqueous drug formulations can result in significant enhancement of the drug/CD complexation. Thus, less CD

Limitations of cyclodextrin applications in ophthalmic drug delivery

Recent studies have shown that addition of CDs to ophthalmic drug formulations can offer many advantages. However, inclusion of CDs in ophthalmic formulations has revealed that there are some basic differences between the ophthalmic formulations and other CD containing drug formulations, and that these differences may induce some limitations in the ophthalmic applications of CDs. For purpose of general overview, the various advantages and drawbacks of including CDs in ophthalmic formulations

Formulation and clinical evaluation of aqueous eye drop solutions in humans

As mentioned before, it is very important to optimise CD containing drug formulation with regard to drug availability. Simple addition of undefined amount of CD to existing formulations really leads to the desired result. Following are two examples of formulation and testing of aqueous eye drop solutions. In both cases the drug availability was enhanced through addition of a water-soluble polymer and heating in an autoclave (120–140°C for 20–40 mm).

Conclusions

Until recently the functions of CDs in ophthalmic drug delivery were poorly understood. However, numerous studies have shown that CDs are useful additives in ophthalmic formulations for increasing the aqueous solubility, stability and bioavailability of ophthalmic drugs, and to decrease drug irritation. The CD complexation of water-soluble drugs (e.g., in order to increase their chemical stability or to decrease ophthalmic drug irritation) may decrease their ophthalmic bioavailability, but this

Acknowledgements

Tomi Järvinen was supported by the Academy of Finland. Thorsteinn Loftsson gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Nagai Foundation Tokyo, Japan.

References (122)

  • R.D Schoenwald et al.

    Relationship between steroid permeability across excited rabbit cornea and octanol–water partition coefficients

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1978)
  • J.W Sieg et al.

    Vehicle effects on ocular drug bioavailability II: evaluation of pilocarpine

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1977)
  • J Liaw et al.

    The effect of polyethylene glycol molecular weight on corneal transport and the related influence of penetration enhancers

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1992)
  • J Liaw et al.

    The effect of drug charge type and charge density on corneal transport

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1992)
  • A Longwell et al.

    Effect of topically applied pilocarpineon tear film pH

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1976)
  • I Ahmed et al.

    Effect of pH and buffer on the precorneal disposition and ocular penetration of pilocarpine in rabbits

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1984)
  • T Irie et al.

    Pharmaceutical applications of cyclodextrins. III. Toxicological issues and safety evaluation

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1997)
  • B Siefert et al.

    Influence of α-cyclodextrin and hydroxyalkylated β-cyclodextrin derivatives on the in vitro corneal uptake and permeation of aqueous pilocarpine–HCl solutions

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1997)
  • C LeBourlais et al.

    Ophthalmic drug delivery systems-recent advances

    Prog. Retinal Eye Res.

    (1998)
  • S.-L Lin et al.

    In vivo evaluation of indomnethacin/cyclodextrin complexes gastrointestinal tolerance and dermal anti-inflammatory activity

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1994)
  • V.J Stella et al.

    The effect of SBE4-β-CD on i.m. prednisolone pharmacokinetics and tissue damage in rabbits: comparison to a co-solvent solution and a water-soluble prodrug

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1995)
  • T Järvinen et al.

    O,O′-(1,4-xylylene)bispilocarpic acid esters as new potential double prodrugs of pilocarpine for improvement of ocular delivery. II. Physochemical properties. stability, solubility and enzymatic hydrolysis

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1991)
  • P Suhonen et al.

    Rate control of ocular pilocarpine delivery with bispilocarpic acid diester

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1996)
  • H.W Frijlink et al.

    The effect of cyclodextrins on drug absorption. II. In vivo observation

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1990)
  • T Loftsson et al.

    Pharmaceutical applications of cyclodextrins. 1. Drug solubilization and stabilization

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1996)
  • T Loftsson et al.

    Cyclodextrin-accelerated degradation of β-lactam antibiotics in aqueous solutions

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1991)
  • T Backensfeld et al.

    Interaction of NSA with Cyclodextrins and hydroxypropyl cyclodextrin derivatives

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1991)
  • M.T Esclusa-Diaz et al.

    Characterization and in vitro dissolution behaviour of ketakonazole/β- and 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin inclusion compounds

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1996)
  • A Hussain et al.

    Prodrug approaches to enhancement of physicochemical properties of drugs. IV: novel epinephrine prodrug

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1976)
  • A.I Mandell et al.

    Dipivalyl epinephrine: a new pro-drug in the treatment of glaucoma

    Ophthalmol.

    (1978)
  • P Jarho et al.

    The use of Cyclodextrins in ophthalmic formulations of dipivefrin

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1997)
  • N.M Davies et al.

    Evaluation of a hydrocortisone/hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin solution for ocular drug delivery

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1997)
  • D.W Pate et al.

    Effects of topical anandamides on intraocular pressure in normotensive rabbits

    Life Sci.

    (1996)
  • T Loftsson et al.

    The effect of water-soluble polymers on drug-cyclodextrin complexation

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1994)
  • T Loftsson et al.

    The effect of water-soluble polymers on the aqueous solubility and complexing abilities of β-cyclodextrin

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1998)
  • I Loftsson et al.

    Effect of cyclodextrins on topical drug delivery to the eye

    Drug Devel. Ind. Pharm.

    (1997)
  • R.A Rajewski et al.

    Pharmaceutical applications of cyclodextrins. 2. In vivo drug delivery

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1996)
  • H van Dorne

    Interaction between cyclodextrins and ophthalmic drugs

    Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

    (1993)
  • V.J Stella et al.

    Cyclodextrins: their future in drug formulation and delivery

    Pharm. Res.

    (1997)
  • V.H.L Lee et al.

    Topical ocular drug delivery: recent developments and future challenges

    J. Ocul. Pharmacol.

    (1986)
  • D.M. Maurice, S. Mishima, Ocular pharmacokinetics, in: M.C Sears (Ed.), Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, vol. 69,...
  • T Järvinen et al.

    Ocular absorption following topical delivery

    Adv. Drug Del. Rev.

    (1995)
  • J.L Greaves et al.

    Polymers and the precorneal tear film

    S.T.P. Pharm. Sci.

    (1992)
  • I Zaki et al.

    A comparison of the effect of viscosity on the precomeal residence of solutions in rabbit and man

    J. Pharm. Pharmacol.

    (1986)
  • M.A Watsky et al.

    Comparison of conjunctival and corneal surface areas in rabbit and human

    Curr. Eye Res.

    (1988)
  • W Wang et al.

    Lipophilicity influence on conjunctival drug penetration in the pigmented rabbit: a comparison with corneal penetration

    Curr. Eye Res.

    (1991)
  • P Ashton et al.

    Formulation influence on conjunctival penetration of four beta-blockers in the pigmented rabbit: a comparison with corneal penetration

    Pharm. Res.

    (1991)
  • Y Rojanasakul et al.

    The transport barrier of epithelia: a comparative study on membrane permeability and charge selectivity in the rabbit

    Pharm. Res.

    (1992)
  • H.-S Huang et al.

    Corneal penetration behavior of beta-blocking agents II: assessment of barrier contributions

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1983)
  • S.–C. Chang, Prodrug and Vehicle approaches to Improve the Therapeutic Index of Topically Applied Timolol in the...
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text