Elsevier

Life Sciences

Volume 63, Issue 4, 19 June 1998, Pages 293-304
Life Sciences

Comparative effects of nonpeptide tachykinin receptor antagonists on experimental gut inflammation in rats and guinea-pigs

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3205(98)00271-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Previous studies have shown tachykinins implicated in gut inflammation. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of treatments with tachykinin NK1, NK2, and NK3 selective receptor antagonists on the development of gut inflammation induced by trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (TNBS) in rats and guinea-pigs. On day 0, rats and guinea-pigs received an intraluminal instillation of TNBS/ethanol (40 mgkg). Each group was daily treated with intraperitoneally injected NK1 (SR 140333; 0.3 mg/kg/day), NK2 (SR 48968; 5 mg/kg/day), or NK3 (SR 142801; 1, 5, or 10 mg/kg/day) receptor antagonists or their vehicle. On day 4, inflammatory levels were evaluated by measuring gut permeability, myeloperoxidase activity, macro- and microscopic damage scores. In TNBS treated rats, daily administration of SR 140333 (0.3 mg/kg/day) and SR 48968 (5 mg/kg/day) reduced colonic inflammation. In TNBS treated guinea-pigs, daily administration of SR 48968 (5 mg/kg/day) and SR 142801 (at 5 and 10 mg/kg/day) attenuated significantly ileal injury. These results suggest that non-peptide tachykinin receptor antagonists are potent anti-inflammatory agents on gut inflammation in rats and guinea-pigs. However, their activity depends upon the animal species and type of receptor considered.

References (61)

  • P Schmidt et al.

    Peptides

    (1991)
  • P Holzer et al.

    Pharmacol Ther

    (1997)
  • P Holzer et al.

    Pharmacol Ther

    (1997)
  • C.R Mantyh et al.

    Gastroenterology

    (1996)
  • P.W Mantyh et al.

    Peptides

    (1989)
  • C.R Mantyh et al.

    Gastroenterology

    (1995)
  • M Reinshagen et al.

    Gastroenterology

    (1994)
  • J Wallace et al.

    Gastroenterology

    (1992)
  • P.P Bradley et al.

    J Invest Dermatol

    (1982)
  • V Julia et al.

    Gastroenterology

    (1994)
  • X Emonds-Alt et al.

    Life Sci

    (1992)
  • X Emonds-Alt et al.

    Eur J Pharmacol

    (1993)
  • J.E Krawisz et al.

    Gastroenterology

    (1984)
  • A Nagahisa et al.

    Eur J Pharmacol

    (1992)
  • J Bonnet et al.

    Eur J Pharmacol

    (1996)
  • C.A Maggi

    Regul Peptides

    (1997)
  • K Biyah et al.

    Eur J Pharmacol

    (1996)
  • S Evangelista et al.

    Neuropeptides

    (1996)
  • Y Qian et al.

    Pulm Pharmacol

    (1993)
  • R Patacchini et al.

    Eur J Pharmacol

    (1995)
  • D Regoli et al.

    Pharmacol Rev

    (1994)
  • M Otsuka et al.

    Physiol Rev

    (1993)
  • E.F Grady et al.

    J Neurosci

    (1996)
  • P.T Mann et al.

    Cell Tissue Res

    (1997)
  • P Di Sebastiano et al.

    Gastrenterology

    (1996)
  • J.D Wood et al.

    Gastroenterology

    (1996)
  • T.R Koch et al.

    Dig Dis Sci

    (1987)
  • U Keränen et al.

    Dig Dis Sci

    (1995)
  • M.J.S Miller et al.

    Am J Physiol

    (1993)
  • K Sharkey

    Ann N Y Acad Sci

    (1992)
  • Cited by (46)

    • Tachykinin Antagonists Reverse Ischemia/Reperfusion Gastrointestinal Motility Impairment in Rats

      2020, Journal of Surgical Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The present study does not provide the insights to elucidate the molecular mechanism of the beneficial effects of pretreatment with NK1-3 antagonists in gut I/R injury. One can speculate that the potent antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory activities of NK1-3 blockers played a role in the observed phenomenon.24,26-29 The model of I/R injury using the SMA clamping and unclamping is well accepted and easily implemented.

    • Communication Between Enteric Neurons, Glia, and Nociceptors Underlies the Effects of Tachykinins on Neuroinflammation

      2018, Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In support, our results show an up-regulation of TAC1 mRNA during acute colitis and a trending decrease in both NKA and SP immunoreactivity. Prior studies have indicated that NK2Rs contribute to gut inflammation in animal models because NK2R antagonism with SR 48698 prevented weight loss and reduced macroscopic damage during TNBS colitis in rats and guinea pigs.60 In this study, we did not observe a significant effect of GR 159897 on the initial inflammatory insult, but GR 159897 did enhance the recovery from inflammation as reflected by animal weight.

    • Neuronal Regulation of Mucosal Immune Responses

      2015, Mucosal Immunology: Fourth Edition
    • Opposite effects of substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide in oxazolone colitis

      2012, Digestive and Liver Disease
      Citation Excerpt :

      Both CGRP and SP appear to act as important messengers between the nervous and immune systems [9]. Pharmacological blocking of the SP high-affinity receptor NK-1 using CP and SR14033 showed anti-inflammatory effects in rat models of TNBS and DSS colitis [2,3,6]. However, another NK-1 antagonist was ineffective [4,7].

    • TRPA1 and substance P mediate colitis in mice

      2011, Gastroenterology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Such an oxidation product is stable and could contribute to sustaining the activation/sensitization of the receptor channel if applied to the Cys residues in TRPA1. The released neuropeptides are candidate mediators for linking the sensory neurons to the immune system and generating inflammation.17–23 We used null mutant mouse strains and generated a double-knockout line for CGRP and SP to study both mechanistically different colitis models (Figure 6).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text