Elsevier

Biological Psychiatry

Volume 43, Issue 1, 1 January 1998, Pages 2-11
Biological Psychiatry

Original Articles
Antipsychotic Properties of the Partial Dopamine Agonist (−)-3-(3-Hydroxyphenyl)-N-n-Propylpiperidine (Preclamol) in Schizophrenia

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(97)00030-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Background: In an ongoing effort to characterize the clinical pharmacologic profile of the partial dopamine agonist (−)-3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-n-propylpiperidine [(−)-3PPP], we administered it to drug-free schizophrenic patients in two consecutive studies.

Methods: In a preliminary dose-finding study, 9 patients were treated using a 6-week placebo-controlled crossover design. Then, to properly demonstrate the antipsychotic effect, we carried out an early efficacy study; here 10 patients received (−)-3PPP, 300 mg B.I.D., in a 1-week placebo-controlled crossover study.

Results: Dose-Finding Study: (−)-3PPP showed apparent antipsychotic effect in repeated dosing, with 300 mg B.I.D. being the most effective dose for antipsychotic action; however, the apparent antipsychotic action was not sustained for longer than 1 week, presumably because of desensitization of the receptor by the agonist.

Early Efficacy Study: Positive symptoms as measured by the Psychosis Change Scale decreased in 1 week by 30% with (−)-3PPP compared to placebo, and negative symptoms measured with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale Withdrawal subscale decreased by 28% with the drug. In both studies, (−)-3PPP lacked any evidence of motor side effects.

Conclusions: These data show that psychotic symptoms decrease with (−)-3PPP and suggest that the treatment of schizophrenia with partial dopamine agonist is a promising strategy. Future attention will be directed toward testing techniques to diminish the tachyphylaxis to allow an ongoing therapeutic effect.

Introduction

In laboratory experiments, dopamine agonists have been shown to reduce the synthesis and release of dopamine from dopamine-containing midbrain neurons in experimental animals, presumably through an agonist action at the dopamine autoreceptor (Kehr et al 1972; Bunney et al 1973; Walters and Roth 1975; Walters et al 1975). Moreover, at low doses, dopamine agonists appear to preferentially stimulate the autoreceptor because of the higher sensitivity of this receptor for dopamine and its agonists (Carlsson 1975; Roth 1979). This results in a paradoxical antidopaminergic action of dopamine agonists (Walters and Roth 1976; Skirboll et al 1979). This preclinical action serves as the theoretical basis for evaluating the antipsychotic action of dopamine agonists in schizophrenia, despite the known therapeutic action of dopamine D2 receptor antagonists in psychosis (Delay and Deniker 1952; Klein and Davis 1969). Based on this preclinical rationale, apomorphine was first tested in schizophrenia (Smith et al 1977; Tamminga et al 1978; Corsini et al 1977, Corsini et al 1981; Jeste et al 1983) as was N-propylnorapomorphine (Tamminga et al 1986), and demonstrated to have an antipsychotic effect. Although these agonist treatments showed antipsychotic activity, several other agonist studies, in different designs usually involving chronic treatment, failed to confirm a dopamine agonist-induced antipsychotic effect (Tamminga and Schaffer 1979; Angrist et al 1980; Ferrier et al 1984; Levy et al 1984). These conflicting findings signaled the need to reexamine this strategy. Meanwhile, partial dopamine agonists with their reduced intrinsic activity and even higher preferential affinity for the autoreceptor were synthesized, seemingly even better designed to test this hypothesis. Because the partial dopamine agonist (−)-3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-n-propylpiperidine [(−)-3PPP; Preclamol] was already extensively characterized preclinically, we selected this compound to test for efficacy in schizophrenic persons with florid psychosis.

3PPP is a phenylpiperidine derivative and a dopamine congener. It exists as a racemic mixture with each enantiomer showing different, sometimes opposite, effects at the dopamine synapse (Hjorth et al 1983). The negative enantiomer (−)-3PPP preferentially stimulates the dopamine autoreceptor, but can function as an agonist at the postsynaptic site as well. (−)-3PPP has little significant affinity for other monoaminergic, or other receptors (Clark et al 1985a), including the D1, serotonin 5-HT1A, and 5-HT2 (R. Lahti, unpublished data); however, its actions appear to be at least partially selective for limbic regions. It reduces open field exploratory behavior in rats following injection into nucleus accumbens, but not into striatum (Svensson and Ahlenius 1983). It reduces locomotor activity in mice, but even at high doses fails to induce catalepsy (Arnt 1983; Hjorth et al 1983). It only partially and never fully reverses the increase in dopamine synthesis produced by gammabutyrolactone (GBL), presumably by its full occupation but only partial agonist activity at the dopamine (DA) autoreceptor (Clark et al 1985a, Clark et al 1985b; Pugsley et al 1995). (−)-3PPP only partially inhibits the firing of DA cells in the central nervous system and this action is fully reversed by haloperidol (Clark et al 1985a; Meltzer et al 1995). With the developing concept of partial receptor agonists (Ariens 1983; Kenakin 1993), (−)-3PPP became the first partial dopamine agonist widely evaluated pharmacologically for its effects on dopamine system function (Bergstrom et al 1986). Based on the receptor state binding affinity ratio method or the inhibition of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (AMP) to determine intrinsic activity, (−)-3PPP has an intrinsic activity at the D2 receptor of 35%, at the D3 receptor of 44%, and at the D4 receptor of 83% (Lahti et al 1992, Lahti et al 1996; Chio et al 1994). In Phase I human safety studies carried out in schizophrenic individuals, the use of (−)-3PPP has been shown to be safe, its single dose kinetics defined, and the presence of efficacy suggested (Tamminga et al 1992).

We report here the results of two sequential double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of (−)-3PPP in neuroleptic-free schizophrenic patients, one a preliminary dose-finding study and the other, an early efficacy trial.

Section snippets

Patients and Diagnosis

Sixteen patient volunteers with schizophrenia agreed to participate in these two studies after being informed about the nature of the research. The protocol and consent form were reviewed and approved by the University of Maryland Human Volunteer Board. Subjects were inpatients at the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center (MPRC), Residential Research Unit for the duration of the study. They received a diagnosis of schizophrenia using DSM-III-R criteria as made by two experienced clinicians based

Preliminary Dose-Finding Study

This initial study was conducted as a 6-week drug–placebo crossover with multiple doses tested in the drug phase. Regardless of dose, during the first week of treatment with (−)-3PPP the overall mean BPRS total score decreased by 14% compared to placebo treatment in the 9 patients studied; however, after that in the second and third weeks, the total BPRS score changed less than 5% from placebo with the (−)-3PPP treatment (Fig. 1). This was true for both positive and negative symptoms. Because

Discussion

We report here that in otherwise drug-free schizophrenic persons, the partial dopamine agonist (−)-3PPP has a significant antipsychotic effect, acting on both the positive and negative symptoms of the illness, without the appearance of any motor side effects. The two consecutive studies presented here are an initial part of an effort to characterize the action of the partial dopamine agonist (−)-3PPP in schizophrenic psychosis. We have previously reported a phase I safety study in schizophrenic

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by NIMH grant #MH49667 and #MH40279.

The authors wish to thank the staff of the Residential Research Unit of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, Deborah Medoff and Li-Wan Chen for statistical consultation, and Kristin Ricasa for secretarial assistance.

References (53)

  • NC Andreasen

    Negative symptoms of schizophreniaDefinitions and reliability

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (1982)
  • B Angrist et al.

    Responses to apomorphine, amphetamine and neuroleptics in schizophrenic subjects

    Psychopharmacology

    (1980)
  • EJ Ariens

    Intrinsic activityPartial agonists and partial antagonists

    J Cardiovasc Pharmacol

    (1983)
  • BM Astrachan et al.

    A checklist for the diagnosis of schizophrenia

    Br J Psychiatry

    (1972)
  • BS Bunney et al.

    Comparison of effects of L-dopa, amphetamine, and apomorphine on firing rate of rat dopaminergic neurons

    Nature

    (1973)
  • HE Cannon-Spoor et al.

    Measurement of premorbid adjustment in chronic schizophrenia

    Schizophr Bull

    (1982)
  • A Carlsson

    Dopaminergic autoreceptors

  • CL Chio et al.

    Activation of heterologously expressed D3 dopamine receptorsComparison with D2 dopamine receptors

    Mol Pharmacol

    (1994)
  • D Clark et al.

    Dopamine-receptor agonistsMechanisms underlying autoreceptor selectivity: I. Review of the evidence

    J Neural Transm

    (1985)
  • D Clark et al.

    Dopamine-receptor agonistsMechanisms underlying autoreceptor selectivity: II. Theoretical considerations

    J Neural Transm

    (1985)
  • GU Corsini et al.

    Sedative, hypnotic and antipsychotic effects of low doses of apomorphine in man

    Adv Biochem Psychopharmacol

    (1977)
  • CU Corsini et al.

    Behavioral effects of apomorphine in manDopamine receptor implications

  • Delay J, Deniker P (1952): Trente-huit cas de psychoses traitees par la cure prolongee et continue de 4500 R.P. [Thirty...
  • IN Ferrier et al.

    Clinical effects of apomorphine in schizophrenia

    Br J Psychiatry

    (1984)
  • S Hjorth et al.

    Central dopamine receptor agonist and antagonist actions of the enantiomers of (−)-3PPP

    Psychopharmacology

    (1983)
  • JM Kane et al.

    Integrating incidence and prevalence of tardive dyskinesia

    Psychopharmacol Bull

    (1986)
  • Cited by (103)

    • Dopamine partial agonists and prodopaminergic drugs for schizophrenia: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

      2022, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      We attempted to obtain these data, but received a response from only one corresponding author to inform us that the study was ongoing (Euctr, 2014). We included 30 trials of dopamine partial agonists; thirteen studies of aripiprazole (three of aripiprazole IM (Kane et al., 2014; Kane et al., 2012; Meltzer et al., 2015), ten of aripiprazole PO (Petrie et al., 1997; Daniel et al., 2000; Kane et al., 2002; Cutler et al., 2006; McEvoy et al., 2007; Pigott et al., 2003; Potkin et al., 2003; Cantillon et al., 2017; Durgam et al., 2015; Euctr, 2009)), six of brexpiprazole (Euctr, 2009; Correll et al., 1 2015; Fleischhacker et al., 1 2017; Ishigooka et al., 2018; Kane et al., 2015; Nct, 2013), five of cariprazine (Durgam et al., 2015; Durgam et al., 2016; Durgam et al., 2016; Durgam et al., 2014; Kane et al., 2015), four of bifeprunox (Bourin et al., 2007 Mar; Casey et al., 2008; Euctr, 2008; Meltzer et al., 2007) and one study each of preclamol (Lahti et al., 1998) and brilaroxazine (Cantillon et al., 2017). We included 29 trials of prodopaminergic treatments; eight studies of modafinil (Arbabi et al., 2012; Freudenreich et al., 2009; Lohr et al., 2013; Michalopoulou et al., 2015; Minzenberg et al., 2016; Pierre et al., 2007; Sevy et al., 2005; Shoja Shafti and Akbari, 2016), three studies of armodafinil (Bobo et al., 2011; Kane et al., 2010; Kane et al., 2012), five studies of dexamphetamine and lisdexamphetamine (Barch and Carter, 1 2005; Lasser et al., 2013; Martin et al., 2014; Pietrzak et al., 2010; Sanfilipo et al., 1996; Strakowski et al., 1 1997), three studies each of L-dopa (Chouinard et al., 1987; Gerlach and Luhdorf, 1975; Owens et al., 1994) and apomorphine/N-propylnorapomorphine (Schaffer et al., 1980; Tamminga et al., 1986; Syvalahti et al., 1986), two studies each of bromocriptine(Gattaz et al., 1989; Tamminga and Schaffer, 1979) and methylphenidate(Lieberman et al., 1994; Carpenter et al., 1992), and one study each of pramipexole (Kelleher et al., 2012), tolcapone (Nct, 2002) and the ergot dopamine agonist CF-25–397 (Tamminga and Schaffer, 1979).

    • Stereoselective synthesis of (−)-3-PPP through palladium-catalysed unactivated C(sp<sup>3</sup>)–H arylation at the C-3 position of L-pipecolinic acid

      2017, Tetrahedron Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      The most potent therapeutically active compounds for central dopamine autoreceptor stimulating activity is (−)-3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-(n-propyl)-piperidine [(−)-3-PPP, Preclamol],1–8 which is also reported to be the first selective D2-like dopamine autoreceptor agonist.7,8 In addition, preclamol was tested for antipsychotic potential with therapeutic effect in the treatment of schizophrenia and Parkinson’s diseases.9–11 Furthermore, preclamol has been extensively studied as a pharmacological tool to investigate dopaminergic mechanisms (Fig. 1).12–15

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text