Skip to main content
Log in

Behavioral sensitization: Characterization of enduring changes in rotational behavior produced by intermittent injections of amphetamine in male and female rats

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Factors influencing the behavioral sensitization (“reverse tolerance”) produced by intermittent amphetamine (AMPH) injections were studied by quantifying rotational behavior in rats that had a unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine lesion of the substantia nigra. The results indicate that (1) a single injection of a low dose of AMPH enhances rotational behavior induced by a second injection of AMPH for up to 12 weeks; (2) multiple, weekly injections of AMPH produce a progressive enhancement in rotational behavior, over-and-above that produced by a single injection; (3) female rats show more robust sensitization than males following single or multiple injections of AMPH; (4) this sex difference may be due to the suppression of sensitization by an androgen, because removal of testicular hormones potentiates sensitization; (5) the long-lasting sensitization of rotational behavior produced by infrequent injections of AMPH is not due to drug-environment conditioning effects, but perhaps to a persistent AMPH-induced change(s) in brain catecholamine systems; and (6) a simple change in DA receptors is probably no involved, because the sensitization produced by infrequent injections of AMPH does not influence the rotation produced by a subsequent injection of apomorphine. The results illustrate an intriguing example of neuroplasticity that may have clinical relevance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antelman SM, Chiodo LA (1981) Dopamine autoreceptor subsensitivity: a mechanism common to the treatment of depression and the induction of amphetamine psychosis? Biol Psychiatry 16:717–727

    Google Scholar 

  • Antelman SM, Chiodo LA (1983) Amphetamine as a stressor. In: Creese I (ed) Stimulants: neurochemical, behavioral, and clinical perspectives. Raven Press, New York, p 269

    Google Scholar 

  • Antelman SM, Eichler AJ, Black CA, Kocan D (1980) Interchangeability of stress and amphetamine in sensitization. Science 207:329–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Arai Y (1981) Synaptic correlates of sexual differentiation. TINS Dec: 291–293

  • Becker JB, Ramirez VD (1981) Sex differences in the amphetamine-stimulated release of catecholamines from rat striatal tissue in vitro. Brain Res 204:361–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker JB, Robinson TE, Lorenz KA (1982) Sex differences and estrous cycle variations in amphetamine-elicited rotational behavior. Eur J Pharmacol 80:65–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass CA, Glick SD (1981) Sex differences in drug-induced rotation in two strains of rats. Brain Res 223:229–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Breese GR, Traylor TD (1971) Depletion of brain noradrenaline and dopamine by 6-hydroxydopamine. Br J Pharmacol 42:88–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne RG, Segal DS (1977) Metabolic and experiential factors in the behavioral response to repeated amphetamine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 6:545–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Castañeda E, Robinson TE, Becker JB (1984) Involvement of nigrostriatal dopamine neurons in the contraversive rotational behavior evoked by electrical stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus. Brain Res (in press)

  • Connell PH (1958) Amphetamine psychosis. Chapman and Hill, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Conney PH (1967) Pharmacological implications of microsomal enzyme induction. Pharmacol Rev 19:317–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway PG, Uretsky NJ (1982) Role of striatal dopaminergic receptors in amphetamine-induced behavioral facilitation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 221:650–655

    Google Scholar 

  • Creese I (1983) Stimulants: Neurochemical, behavioral, and clinical perspectives. Raven Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Echols SD (1977) Circling of mice bearing unilateral striatal lesions: development of increased response to d-amphetamine. Life Sci 21:563–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Echols SD (1979) Reverse tolerance to amphetamine of mice bearing unilateral striatal lesions: effect upon the circling response to apomorphine. Life Sci 24:691–696

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichler AJ, Antelman SM, Black CA (1980) Amphetamine stereotypy is not a homogeneous phenomenon: sniffing and licking show distinct profiles of sensitization and tolerance. Psychopharmacology 68:287–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellinwood EH, Sudilovsky A, Nelson LM (1973) Evolving behavior in the clinical and experimental (model) psychosis. Am J Psychiatry 130:1088–1092

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison G, Eison MS (1983) Continuous amphetamine intoxication: an animal model of the acute psychotic episode. Psychol Med 13:751–761

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison G, Eison MS, Huberman HS, Daniel F (1978) Long-term changes in dopaminergic innervation of caudate necleus after continuous amphetamine administration. Science 201:276–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison G, Morris W (1981) Opposed stages of continuous amphetamine administration: parallel alterations in motor stereotypies and in vivo spiroperidol accumulation. Eur J Pharmacol 74:207–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison G, Ratan R (1982) The late stage following continuous amphetamine administration to rats is correlated with altered dopamine but not serotonin metabolism. Life Sci 31:771–777

    Google Scholar 

  • Felice LJ, Felice JD, Kissinger PT (1978) Determination of catecholamines in rat brain parts by reverse-phase ion-pair liquid chromatography. J Neurochem 31:1461–1465

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemenbaum A (1979) Failure of apomorphine to induce dopamine receptor hypersensitivity. Psychopharmacology 62:175–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujii T, Ikeda H (1982) Sex difference in the development of hypersensitivity or tolerance to haloperidol in the rat. Jpn J Pharmacol 32:247–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnegy ME, Bernabei A, Treisman G (1983) Chronic sulpiride treatment produces supersensitivity of striatal adenylate cyclase to dopamine in sexually immature or adult castrated rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 224:627–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenough WT, Carter CS, Steerman C, De Voogd TJ (1977) Sex differences in dendritic patterns in hamster preoptic area. Brain Res 126:62–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein S, Glick SD (1975) Improved automated apparatus for recording rotation (circling behavior) in rats and mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 3:507–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith JD, Cavanaugh J, Held J, Oates JA (1972) Dextroamphetamine: evaluation of psychomimetic properties in man. Arch Gen Psychiatry 26:97–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Hefti F, Melamed E, Wurtman RJ (1980a) Partial lesions of the dopaminergic nigrostriatal system in rat brain: biochemical characterization. Brain Res 195:123–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Hefti F, Melamed E, Sahakian BJ, Wurtman RJ (1980b) Circling behavior in rats with partial, unilateral nigro-striatal lesions: effect of amphetamine, apomorphine, and DOPA. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 12:185–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen SD (1977) Brain dopamine systems and behavior. In: Iversen LL, Iversen SD, Snyder SH (eds) Handbook of psychopharmacology. vol. 8, Plenum, New York, p 333

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenner P, Pycock C, Marsden CD (1978) The effect of chronic administration and withdrawal of amphetamine on cerebral dopamine receptor sensitivity. Psychopharmacology 58:131–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Klawans HL, Margolin DI (1975) Amphetamine-induced dopaminergic hypersensitivity in guinea pigs. Arch Gen Psychiatry 32:725–732

    Google Scholar 

  • Koller WC, Weiner WJ, Klawans HL, Nausieda PA (1980) Influence of female sex hormones on neurolepticinduced behavioral supersensitivity. Neuropharmacology 19:387–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer JC, Fischman VS, Littlefield DC (1967) Amphetamine abuse. JAMA 201:305–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuczenski R, Leith NJ (1981) Chronic amphetamine: is dopamine a link in or a mediator of the development of tolerance and reverse tolerance? Pharmacol Biochem Behav 15:405–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuczenski R, Segal DS, Weinberger SB, Browne RG (1982) Evidence that a behavioral augmentation following repeated amphetamine administration does not involve peripheral mechanisms. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 17:547–553

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn CM, Schanberg SM (1977) Distribution and metabolism of amphetamine in tolerant animals. In: Ellinwood EH, Kilbey MM (eds) Cocaine and other stimulants. Plenum, New York, p 161

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewine RRJ (1981) Sex differences in schizophrenia: timing or subtypes? Psychol Bull 90:432–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Magos L (1969) Persistence of the effect of amphetamine on stereotyped activity in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 6:200–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Martres PMP, Costentin J, Baudry M, Marcais H, Protais P, Schwartz JC (1977) Long-term changes in the sensitivity of preand post-synaptic dopamine receptors in mouse striatum evidenced by behavioral and biochemical studies. Brain Res 136:319–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer Jr. EM, Lytle LD (1978) Sex related differences in the physiological disposition of amphetamine and its metabolites in the rat. Proc West Pharmacol Soc 21:13–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner TA, Loy R (1982) Hormonal regulation of axonal sprouting in the hippocampus. Brain Res 243:180–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickens R, Dougherty JA (1971) Conditioning of the activity effects of durgs. In: Thompson TI, Pickens R (eds) Stimulus properties of drugs. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, p 39

    Google Scholar 

  • Post RM (1980) Intermittent versus continuous stimulation: effect of time interval on the development of sensitization or tolerance. Life Sci 26:1275–1282

    Google Scholar 

  • Post RM (1981) Central stimulants: clinical and experimental evidence on tolerance and sensitization. In: Israel Y, Glaser FB, Kalant H, Pophano RE, Schmidt W, Smart RG (eds) Research advances in alcohol and drug problems. Vol. 6, Plenum Press, New York, p 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Post RM, Contel NR (1983) Human and animal studies of cocaine: implications for development of behavioral pathology. In: Creese I (ed) Stimulants: Neurochemical, behavioral, and clinical perspectives. Raven Press, New York, p 169

    Google Scholar 

  • Post RM, Kopanda RT (1976) Cocaine, kindling, and psychosis. Am J Psychiatry 133:627–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Post RM, Lockfeld A, Squillace KM, Contal NR (1981) Drug-environment interaction: context dependency of cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization. Life Sci 28:755–760

    Google Scholar 

  • Pycock CJ (1980) Turning behavior in animals. Neuroscience 5:461–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Raisman G, Field PM (1973) Sexual dimorphism in the neuropil of the preoptic area of the rat and its dependence on neonatal androgen. Brain Res 54:1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebec GV, Segal DS (1980) Apparent tolerance to some aspects of amphetamine stereotypy with long-term treatment. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 13:793–797

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricaurte GA, Guillery RS, Seiden LS, Schuster CR (1984) Nerve terminal degeneration after a single injection of D-amphetamine in iprindole treated rats: relation to selective long-lasting dopamine depletion. Brain Res 291:378–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson TE, Becker JB (1983) The rotational behavior model: asymmetry in the effects of unilateral 6-OHDA lesions of the substantia nigra in rats. Brain Res 264:127–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson TE, Becker JB (1982) Behavioral sensitization is accompanied by an enhancement in amphetamine-stimulated dopamine release from striatal tissue in vitro. Eur J Pharmacol 85:253–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson TE, Becker JB, Presty SK (1982a) Long-term facilitation of amphetamine-induced rotational behavior and striatal dopamine release produced by a single exposure to amphetamine: sex differences. Brain Res 253:231–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson TE, Becker JB, Ramirez BD (1980) Sex differences in amphetamine-elicited rotational behavior and the lateralization of striatal dopamine in rats. Brain Res Bull 5:539–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson TE, Camp DM, Jacknow DS, Becker JB (1982b) Sex differences and estrous cycle dependent variation in rotational behavior elicited by electrical stimulation of the mesostriatal dopamine system. Behav Brain Res 6:273–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato M, Chen C-C, Akiyama K, Otsuki S (1983) Acute exacerbation of paranoid psychotic state after long-term abstinence in patients with previous methamphetamine psychosis. Biol Psychiatry 18:429–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiff SR (1982) Conditioned dopaminergic activity. Biol Psychiatry 17:135–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal DS (1975) Behavioral and neurochemical correlates of repeated d-amphetamine administration. In Mandell AJ (ed) Neurobiological mechanism of adaptation and behavior. Raven Press, New York, p 247

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal DS, Janowsky DS (1978) Psychostimulant-induced behavioral effects: possible models of schizophrenia. In: Lipton MA, DiMascio A, Killam KF (eds) Psychopharmacology: A generation of progress. Raven Press, New York, p 1113

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal DS, Mandell AJ (1974) Long-term administration of d-amphetamine: progressive augmentation of motor activity and stereotypy. Phamacol Biochem Behav 2:249–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal DS, Schuckit MA (1983) Animal models of stimulant-induced psychosis. In: Creese I (ed) Stimulants: Neurochemical, behavioral, and clinical perspectives. Raven Press, New York, p 131

    Google Scholar 

  • Steranka LR (1983) Long-term effects of a priming dose and short-term infusion of amphetamine on strital dopamine neurons in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 96:159–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilson HA, Rech RH (1973) Conditioned drug effects and absence of tolerance to d-amphetamine induced motor activity. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1:149–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Ungerstedt U (1979) Central dopamine mechanisms and unconditioned behavior. In: Horn AS, Korf J, Westerink BH (eds) The neurobiology of dopamine. Academic Press, London, p 577

    Google Scholar 

  • Ungerstedt U (1971) Striatal dopamine release after amphetamine or nerve degeneration revealed by rotational behavior. Acta Physiol Scand (Suppl 367) 82:49–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Ungerstedt U, Arbuthnott GW (1970) Quantitative recording of rotational behavior in rats after 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the nigrostriatal dopamine system. Brain Res 24:485–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallach MB, Gershon S (1971) Sensitization to amphetamines. Psychopharmacol Bull 7:30–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt DC, Katz K, Shepherd M (1983) The natural history of schizophrenia: a 5-year prospective follow-up of a representative sample of schizophrenics by means of a standardized clinical and social assessment. Psychol Med 13:663–670

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissman MM, Klerman GL (1977) Sex differences and the epidemiology of depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 34:98–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu WA (1982) Sex difference in the regeneration of the hypoglossal nerve in rats. Brain Res 238:404–406

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robinson, T.E. Behavioral sensitization: Characterization of enduring changes in rotational behavior produced by intermittent injections of amphetamine in male and female rats. Psychopharmacology 84, 466–475 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00431451

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00431451

Key words

Navigation