Table 6

Stimulation of cAMP production in HEK293 cells stably transfected with cDNAs coding for hCRF1, hCRF, xCRF1, or xCRF2 receptors

PeptidehCRF1 EC50hCRFEC50xCRF1 EC50xCRF2EC50
nM
hCRF0.64  ± 0.048.11  ± 0.366-a 0.72  ± 0.069.81  ± 0.496-a
oCRF0.61  ± 0.0529.1  ± 1.76-b 8.14  ± 0.276-c 32.1  ± 2.16-b
rUCN1.69  ± 0.096-d 1.86  ± 0.116-e 2.29  ± 0.146-e 1.74  ± 0.136-e
hUCN1.81  ± 0.116-d 1.52  ± 0.096-e 2.34  ± 0.156-e 1.94  ± 0.136-e
Urotensin I0.52  ± 0.040.60  ± 0.050.78  ± 0.060.46  ± 0.04
Sauvagine0.42  ± 0.030.34  ± 0.0336.9  ± 1.16-f 0.24  ± 0.02

The data are the mean ± S.E. of four stimulations.

  • Statistically significant differences:

  • 6-a  p < 0.0001 vs. rUCN, hUCN, urotensin I, and sauvagine;

  • 6-b  p < 0.0001 vs. hCRF, rUCN, hUCN, urotensin I and sauvagine;

  • 6-c  p < 0.0001 vs. hCRF, rUCN, hUCN, and urotensin I;

  • 6-d  p < 0.0001 vs. hCRF, oCRF, urotensin I, and sauvagine;

  • 6-e  p < 0.01 vs. urotensin I and sauvagine;

  • 6-f  p < 0.0001 vs. hCRF, oCRF, rUCN, hUCN, and urotensin I.