Table 1

Binding affinity and in vivo potency of Δ9-THC, WIN 55,212-2 and indole-derived cannabinoids

CompoundKiSAMPERTRIRat DD
nM
Δ9-THC410.922.72.5NT1.8
WIN 55,212-2240.191.41.5NTNT
graphic
RR′KiSAMPERTRIRat DD
nM
n-MethylCH3 >10,000NTNTNTNTNT
n-EthylCH3 1180  ± 44NTNTNTNTNT
n-PropylCH3 164  ± 2218.784.799.187.245.9
n-ButylCH3 22  ± 1.52.60.234.112.97.3
n-PentylCH3 9.5  ± 4.50.700.254.31.9<8.5
n-HexylCH3 48  ± 13<2.79.517.116.019.8
n-HeptylCH3 >10,000117>261>261>261>261
n-MethylH>10,000>35.1>35.1>35.1NTNT
n-EthylH1390  ± 123NTNTNTNTNT
n-PropylH1050  ± 55NTNTNTNTNT
n-ButylH8.9  ± 1.80.341.33.3NTNT
n-PentylH9  ± 50.44∼0.091.73.9NT
n-HexylH9.8  ± 20.960.731.5NTNT
n-HeptylH128  ± 1756.917.6>81.3NTNT

For all tables, “no max” indicates that the compound produced only slightly greater than 50% of the presumed maximal effect. “∼dose” indicates an estimated ED50 because the dose-effect curve was not linear. “>dose” indicates that 50% activity was not achieved at this dose, which was the highest dose of the compound that was tested. “NT” = not tested. All ED50values are expressed as micromoles per kilogram. SA, suppression of spontaneous activity; MPE, % maximum possible antinociceptive effect in the tail-flick assay; RT, rectal temperature; RI, ring immobility; rat DD, drug discrimination in rats.