TABLE 1

Affinities, potencies, and efficacies of substituted tryptamines at the 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, and 5-HT1A receptors

5-HT2AR5-HT2CR5-HT1AR
Stimulation of IP-1Stimulation of IP-1
FormationFormation
Inhibition of [3H]5-HT BindingEC50 (nM) ± S.E.M. (n)Inhibition of [3H]5-HT BindingEC50 (nM) ± S.E.M. (n)Inhibition of [3H]8-OH-DPAT Binding[35S]GTPγS Binding EC50 (nM) ± S.E.M. (n)
DrugKi (nM) ± S.E.M. (n)% Max EffectKi (nM) ± S.E.M. (n)% Max EffectKi (nM) ± S.E.M. (n)% Max Effect
DMT347 ± 47 (22)527 ± 45 (20)234 ± 16 (22)104 ± 11 (20)356 ± 34 (17)210 ± 31 (18)
38.4% ± 1.8%97.6% ± 2.1%97.1% ± 2.4%
DET530 ± 120 (4)612 ± 97 (3)970 ± 280 (3)a660 ± 210 (4)a370 ± 25 (3)138 ± 25 (4)
46.1% ± 6.7%106.4% ± 4.5%97.9% ± 5.6%
DPT374 ± 97 (3)943 ± 88 (4)807 ± 86 (3)a444 ± 55 (3)b186 ± 31 (3)274 ± 55 (3)
85.2% ± 5.1%a93.2% ± 3.6%98.5% ± 7.5%
4-OH-DET269 ± 79 (5)296 ± 59 (3)388 ± 45 (3)151 ± 33 (3)1840 ± 350 (3)a1030 ± 250 (5)b
80.2% ± 5.2%a83.0% ± 5.0%80.3% ± 4.0%c
4-OH-DiPT430 ± 140 (3)334 ± 55 (3)3800 ± 870 (3)a1080 ± 130 (3)a8400 ± 2000 (3)a3900 ± 1100 (4)a
104.4% ± 2.8%a103.73% ± 0.77%36.1% ± 9.9%a
4-OH-DMT79 ± 23 (4)a69 ± 22 (3)a84 ± 28 (3)d9.1 ± 1.2 (3)a374 ± 35 (3)130 ± 11 (3)
48.3% ± 6.9%85.6% ± 3.2%96% ± 13%
4-OH-MET46.3 ± 4.9 (3)a87 ± 22 (5)a153 ± 43 (3)34.6 ± 8.7 (4)950 ± 210 (3)c1390 ± 490 (5)d
54.1% ± 3.0%b100.7% ± 4.9%89.8% ± 5.8%
4-OH-MiPT113 ± 31 (4)306 ± 11 (3)750 ± 110 (3)d261 ± 45 (3)5870 ± 430 (6)a2590 ± 640 (3)a
74.2% ± 1.8%a98.4% ± 4.4%82.7% ± 2.0%
4-OH-MPT71.0 ± 5.9 (4)a63.8 ± 9.4 (4)a203 ± 25 (5)66.0 ± 3.5910 ± 120 (3)b490 ± 170 (3)
53.4% ± 3.6%c99.5% ± 1.5%90.4% ± 9.3%
4-AcO-DET248 ± 26 (3)309 ± 97 (4)1510 ± 360 (3)a1010 ± 390 (3)a4570 ± 690 (3)a4500 ± 1400 (4)a
79.1% ± 4.7%a93.9% ± 9.9%53.9% ± 2.1%a
4-AcO-DiPT850 ± 280 (5)c559 ± 97 (3)5000 ± 1100 (4)a1410 ± 310 (3)a12900 ± 2000 (3)a>100 µM (4)a
106.6% ± 1.8%a92.8% ± 4.8%14.3% ± 6.7%a
4-AcO-DMT93 ± 16 (3)b109 ± 15 (5)a224 ± 15 (3)144.7 ± 3.3 (3)202 ± 62 (3)673 ± 77 (3)
39.5% ± 2.6%91.8% ± 7.4%63.4% ± 2.4%d
4-AcO-MET86 ± 15 (3)b201 ± 39 (5)c460 ± 120 (3)91 ± 19 (4)1210 ± 210 (3)b3080 ± 700 (3)a
40.1% ± 1.6%89.7% ± 2.2%82.5% ± 2.8%
4-AcO-MiPT800 ± 100 (4)c445 ± 69 (3)2230 ± 220 (4)a539 ± 81 (4)d11,000 ± 1200 (4)a8200 ± 2100 (3)a
69.2% ± 1.4%a87.2% ± 6.1%58.3% ± 1.7%a
4-MeO-DiPT500 ± 44 (3)870 ± 110 (4)833 ± 67 (3)a179 ± 56 (4)2830 ± 300 (3)a1930 ± 590 (4)a
92.1% ± 2.6%a85.4% ± 7.8%112.6% ± 7.4%
4-MeO-MiPT178 ± 24 (3)376 ± 69 (3)510 ± 100 (3)c120 ± 12 (3)731 ± 42 (4)1490 ± 140 (3)d
63.2% ± 6.9%a82.4% ± 7.9%98.8% ± 3.5%
5-MeO-DALT48 ± 15 (4)a89.6 ± 3.2 (4)a573 ± 48 (3)b299 ± 83 (5)7.95 ± 0.52 (3)a3.4 ± 1.2 (4)a
97.2% ± 4.5%a99.2% ± 3.8%102.3% ± 3.3%
5-MeO-DBT562 ± 57 (5)620 ± 220 (4)3130 ± 430 (5)a2400 ± 300 (4)a337 ± 28 (3)267 ± 86 (3)
17.5% ± 3.0%a75.6% ± 2.8%d106.2% ± 8.2%
5-MeO-DiPT162 ± 32 (4)84 ± 20 (3)a1740 ± 440 (3)a326 ± 92 (4)c149.3 ± 7.6 (3)56 ± 20 (5)b
99.7% ± 2.7%a96.6% ± 3.6%93.8% ± 6.7%
5-MeO-DPT66 ± 12 (4)a102 ± 11 (4)a1290 ± 320 (3)a810 ± 100 (3)a14.5 ± 3.5 (3)a5.41 ± 0.50 (3)a
81.4% ± 1.8%a95.7% ± 4.0%94.8% ± 6.0%
5-MeO-MiPT113 ± 31 (4)b290 ± 62 (3)790 ± 120 (3)a179 ± 56 (6)143 ± 27 (8)d610 ± 210 (8)
89.14% ± 0.70%a101.2% ± 6.5%109.12% ± 0.55%
5-Cl-DMT134 ± 21 (3)310 ± 100 (3)55.4 ± 1.9 (3)a21.8 ± 3.7 (3)b33.4 ± 6.9 (3)a41.7 ± 1.7 (3)c
45.1% ± 7.1%81.2% ± 4.8%94.3% ± 2.8%
Standards
5-HT19.5 ± 1.5 (24)a33.3 ± 3.0 (25)a5.84 ± 0.46 (23)a1.20 ± 0.15 (27)a3.26 ± 0.47 (20)a2.52 ± 0.36 (34)a
101.9% ± 1.1%a98.3% ± 1.4%103.4% ± 1.5%
LSD1.26 ± 0.19 (25)a0.77 ± 0.12 (25)a6.52 ± 0.72 (22)a1.02 ± 0.15 (27)a2.97 ± 0.35 (22)a2.17 ± 0.36 (31)a
74.8% ± 1.9%a86.0% ± 2.0%b98.2% ± 2.0%
DOM27.3 ± 3.1 (12)a45.8 ± 8.1 (11)a46.1 ± 5.6 (12)a24.4 ± 5.0 (10)a8200 ± 1600 (9)a10,800 ± 3200 (8)a
97.0% ± 2.5%a97.4% ± 2.0%76.2% ± 2.9%d
  • (n), number of experiments conducted in duplicate.

  • aP < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test compared with DMT.

  • bP < 0.01, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test compared with DMT.

  • cP < 0.05, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test compared with DMT.

  • dP < 0.001, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test compared with DMT.