PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Cassandra Y. Baskfield
AU  - Billy R. Martin
AU  - Jenny L. Wiley
TI  - Differential Effects of Δ<sup>9</sup>-Tetrahydrocannabinol and Methanandamide in CB1 Knockout and Wild-Type Mice
AID  - 10.1124/jpet.103.055376
DP  - 2004 Apr 01
TA  - Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
PG  - 86--91
VI  - 309
IP  - 1
4099  - http://jpet.aspetjournals.org/content/309/1/86.short
4100  - http://jpet.aspetjournals.org/content/309/1/86.full
SO  - J Pharmacol Exp Ther2004 Apr 01; 309
AB  - Mice devoid of CB1 cannabinoid receptors (CB1-/- mice) provide a unique opportunity to further investigate the role of CB1 receptors in exocannabinoid and endocannabinoid effects. CB1-/- mice (N = 18) and their wild-type littermates (CB1+/+ mice; N = 12) were placed in standard mouse operant chambers and trained to lever press under a fixed ratio 10 schedule of reinforcement. When stable lever press responding under the fixed ratio 10 schedule had been established, cannabinoids and noncannabinoids were administered to both groups. CB1+/+ mice acquired the lever press response more readily than CB1-/- mice. Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) decreased lever press responding in CB1+/+ mice only, whereas methanandamide, a metabolically stable endocannabinoid analog, produced similar response rate decreases in both genotypic groups. Similar to Δ9-THC, another endocannabinoid analog, (R)-(20-cyano-16,16-dimethyl docosa-cis-5,8,11,14-tetraeno)-1′-hydroxy-2′-propylamine (O-1812), decreased responding in CB1+/+ mice, but not in CB1-/- mice. The CB1 receptor antagonist N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride (SR141716A) blocked the effects of Δ9-THC, but not those of methanandamide. Because methanandamide binds poorly to CB2 receptors, these results suggest possible non-CB1, non-CB2 mechanisms of action for methanandamide-induced behavioral disruption of lever press responding. Ethanol and morphine elicited greater response decreases in CB1-/- mice than in CB1+/+ mice, suggesting a possible role of CB1 receptors in the rate disruptive effects of these drugs. In contrast, diazepam did not produce between group differences, suggesting that CB1 receptors are not involved in diazepam-induced disruption of lever press responding. The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics