Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit jpet on Facebook
  • Follow jpet on Twitter
  • Follow jpet on LinkedIn
Research ArticleCardiovascular

Protective Mechanism of the Selective Vasopressin V1A Receptor Agonist Selepressin against Endothelial Barrier Dysfunction

Nektarios Barabutis, Margarita Marinova, Pavel Solopov, Mohammad A. Uddin, Glenn E. Croston, Torsten M. Reinheimer and John D. Catravas
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics November 2020, 375 (2) 286-295; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.120.000146
Nektarios Barabutis
Frank Reidy Research Center for Bioelectrics (N.B., M.M., P.S., J.D.C.) and School of Medical Diagnostic and Translational Sciences, College of Health Sciences (J.D.C.), Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia; School of Basic Pharmaceutical and Toxicological Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Louisiana Monroe, Monroe, Louisiana (N.B., M.A.U.); Croston Consulting, San Diego, California (G.E.C.); and Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark (T.M.R.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margarita Marinova
Frank Reidy Research Center for Bioelectrics (N.B., M.M., P.S., J.D.C.) and School of Medical Diagnostic and Translational Sciences, College of Health Sciences (J.D.C.), Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia; School of Basic Pharmaceutical and Toxicological Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Louisiana Monroe, Monroe, Louisiana (N.B., M.A.U.); Croston Consulting, San Diego, California (G.E.C.); and Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark (T.M.R.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pavel Solopov
Frank Reidy Research Center for Bioelectrics (N.B., M.M., P.S., J.D.C.) and School of Medical Diagnostic and Translational Sciences, College of Health Sciences (J.D.C.), Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia; School of Basic Pharmaceutical and Toxicological Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Louisiana Monroe, Monroe, Louisiana (N.B., M.A.U.); Croston Consulting, San Diego, California (G.E.C.); and Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark (T.M.R.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohammad A. Uddin
Frank Reidy Research Center for Bioelectrics (N.B., M.M., P.S., J.D.C.) and School of Medical Diagnostic and Translational Sciences, College of Health Sciences (J.D.C.), Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia; School of Basic Pharmaceutical and Toxicological Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Louisiana Monroe, Monroe, Louisiana (N.B., M.A.U.); Croston Consulting, San Diego, California (G.E.C.); and Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark (T.M.R.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Glenn E. Croston
Frank Reidy Research Center for Bioelectrics (N.B., M.M., P.S., J.D.C.) and School of Medical Diagnostic and Translational Sciences, College of Health Sciences (J.D.C.), Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia; School of Basic Pharmaceutical and Toxicological Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Louisiana Monroe, Monroe, Louisiana (N.B., M.A.U.); Croston Consulting, San Diego, California (G.E.C.); and Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark (T.M.R.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Torsten M. Reinheimer
Frank Reidy Research Center for Bioelectrics (N.B., M.M., P.S., J.D.C.) and School of Medical Diagnostic and Translational Sciences, College of Health Sciences (J.D.C.), Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia; School of Basic Pharmaceutical and Toxicological Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Louisiana Monroe, Monroe, Louisiana (N.B., M.A.U.); Croston Consulting, San Diego, California (G.E.C.); and Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark (T.M.R.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John D. Catravas
Frank Reidy Research Center for Bioelectrics (N.B., M.M., P.S., J.D.C.) and School of Medical Diagnostic and Translational Sciences, College of Health Sciences (J.D.C.), Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia; School of Basic Pharmaceutical and Toxicological Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Louisiana Monroe, Monroe, Louisiana (N.B., M.A.U.); Croston Consulting, San Diego, California (G.E.C.); and Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark (T.M.R.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Protective effect of selepressin (SEL) against thrombin-induced endothelial barrier dysfunction. HLMVECs were pretreated for 48 hours with either vehicle (VEH; 0.01% DMSO) or 1 nM (A), 10 nM (B), 100 nM (C) selepressin and were exposed to either vehicle (PBS) or thrombin (1 U/ml). A gradual increase in endothelial permeability (reduced TEER) was observed in the thrombin-treated cells, which was reduced in selepressin-treated cells. Similarly, HLMVECs were pretreated for 72 hours with either vehicle (0.01% DMSO) or 1 nM (D), 10 nM (E), 100 nM (F) selepressin and were exposed to either vehicle (PBS) or thrombin (1 U/ml). A gradual increase in endothelial permeability (reduced TEER) was again observed in thrombin-treated cells, which was significantly prevented in 10 and 100 nM selepressin-treated cells. In all the cases, N = 4 per group. Means ± S.E. Two-way ANOVA for repeated measures followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test. Text color reflects the group that is being compared. Arrow indicates the time of addition of either thrombin or vehicle.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Protective effect of selepressin against VEGF- and angiopoietin 2–induced endothelial barrier dysfunction. HLMVECs were pretreated for 72 hours with either vehicle (VEH; 0.01% DMSO) or 1 nM (Fig. 2A), 10 nM (B), or 100 nM (C) selepressin (SEL) and were exposed to either vehicle (PBS) or VEGF (100 ng/ml). A gradual increase in endothelial permeability (reduced TEER) was observed in the VEGF-treated cells, which was concentration dependently reduced in selepressin-treated cells. Similarly, HLMVECs were pretreated for 72 hours with either vehicle (0.01% DMSO) or 100 nM selepressin (D) and were exposed to either vehicle (PBS) or Ang2 (400 ng/ml). Selepressin significantly suppressed Ang2-induced hyperpermeability. N = 4 per group. Means ± S.E. Two-way ANOVA for repeated measures followed by Bonferroni post hoc test. Text color reflects the group that is being compared. Arrow indicates the time of addition of VEGF, Ang2, or vehicle.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Protective effect of selepressin against LPS-induced endothelial barrier dysfunction. HLMVECs were pretreated for 72 hours with either vehicle (VEH; 0.01% DMSO) or 1 nM (A), 10 nM (B), and 100 nM (C) selepressin (SEL) and were exposed to either vehicle (PBS) or LPS (1 EU/ml). A gradual increase in endothelial permeability (reduced TEER) was observed in LPS-treated cells, which was significantly suppressed in all selepressin-treated cells. N = 4 per group. Means ± S.E. Two-way ANOVA for repeated measures followed by Bonferroni post hoc test. Text color reflects the group that is being compared. Arrow indicates the time of addition of either LPS or vehicle.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Efficiency of selepressin blockade of increased permeability with edemogenic agents. Based on data in Figs. 1–3, the percent efficiency of blockade of increased permeability was calculated for each concentration of selepressin and thrombin, VEGF, or LPS, either with 48 or 72 hours pretreatment with selepressin.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Vasopressin receptor inhibition abolishes the protective effects of selepressin toward LPS-induced endothelial hyperpermeability. (A) HLMVECs were pretreated with selepressin (SEL; 100 nM) and the V1AR antagonist atosiban (1 μM) or 0.01% DMSO [vehicle (VEH)] prior to vehicle (PBS) or LPS (1 EU/ml) exposure. Atosiban abolished the protective effects of selepressin against LPS, seen in Fig. 3. (B) HLMVECs were transfected with an irrelevant siRNA (siCTR) or siRNA against the V1AR (siV1AR) and then pretreated for 72 hours with either selepressin or vehicle (0.01% DMSO) prior to vehicle (PBS) or LPS (1 EU/ml) exposure. Treatment with siV1AR abolished the protective effects of selepressin against LPS, seen in Fig. 3. N = 4 per group. Means ± S.E. Two-way ANOVA for repeated measures followed by Bonferroni post hoc test. Text color reflects the group that is being compared. Arrow indicates the time of addition of either LPS or vehicle. NTC, non-targeting control.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Selepressin (SEL) protects HLMVECs against LPS-induced VE-cadherin and actin reorganization. HLMVECs grown on glass coverslips were treated with PBS (vehicle) or LPS (1 EU/ml) after 72 hours of pretreatment with either 0.01% DMSO (vehicle) or selepressin (1, 10, 100, 1000 nM). The cells were then fixed and double-stained for VE-cadherin and actin. Quantification of cortical VE-cadherin staining and of the cortical-to-total-actin distribution is shown in panels (B) and (C), respectively. #P < 0.05 vs. LPS, *P < 0.05 vs. vehicle. Means ± S.E.M. Three slides per group, 10 observations per slide. One-way ANOVA for independent samples followed by Bonferroni post hoc test.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Silencing of vasopressin receptor 1a does not prevent the protective effects of selepressin against LPS–VE-cadherin reorganization but prevents selepressin (SEL) antagonism of LPS-induced gap formation. HLMVECs grown on glass coverslips were treated with irrelevant, control siRNA, or siRNA against the V1AR for 72 hours. After the transfection, the cells were exposed to either vehicle (0.01% DMSO) or selepressin (100 nM) prior to vehicle (PBS) or LPS (1 EU/ml) exposure. Cells were then fixed and double-stained for VE-cadherin and actin. Quantification of cortical VE-cadherin staining and endothelial gaps (expressed as percent coverage of slide surface by cells) is shown in (B). #P < 0.05 vs. negative control (Neg. Cont.) siRNA + LPS, *P < 0.05 vs. AVPR1A siRNA + SEL. Means ± S.E.M. Three slides per group, 10 observations per slide. One-way ANOVA for independent samples followed by Bonferroni post hoc test. AVPR1A, arginine vasopressin receptor 1A.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Signaling pathways involved in the protective effects of selepressin (SEL) against LPS-induced endothelial barrier dysfunction. (A) Quantification of Western blot analysis of p53 expression after treatment of HLMVECs with either vehicle (VEH; 0.01% DMSO) or selepressin (1, 10, 100, and 10,000 nM) for 24 or 48 hours. p53 band signal intensity was analyzed by densitometry. Protein levels were normalized to β-actin. *P < 0.05 vs. vehicle. Means ± S.E.M. (B) Quantification of Western blot analysis of total and active Rac1 after treatment of HLMVECs with selepressin (100 nM) or vehicle (0.01% DMSO) prior to exposure to LPS (1 EU/ml for 1 hour) or vehicle (PBS). Signal intensity was analyzed by densitometry. Protein levels were normalized to total Rac1. *P < 0.05 vs. vehicle. Means ± S.E.M. (C) Western blot analysis of active RhoA and total RhoA levels after treatment of HLMVECs with selepressin (100 nm) or vehicle (0.01% DMSO) for 48 hours and post-treated with LPS (1 EU/ml) or vehicle (PBS) for 1 hour. The blots shown are representative of three independent experiments. Protein levels were normalized to RhoA. ***P < 0.001 vs. vehicle; $$P < 0.01 vs. LPS. (D) Quantification of Western blot analysis of phospho-MLC2 after treatment of HLMVECs with selepressin (100 nM) or vehicle (0.01% DMSO) for 48 hours prior to exposure to LPS (1 EU/ml for 1 hour) or vehicle (PBS). Protein levels were normalized to total MLC2. *P < 0.05 vs. vehicle. Means ± S.E.M. of three independent experiments. One-way ANOVA for independent samples followed by Bonferroni post hoc test.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics: 375 (2)
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Vol. 375, Issue 2
1 Nov 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Protective Mechanism of the Selective Vasopressin V1A Receptor Agonist Selepressin against Endothelial Barrier Dysfunction
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleCardiovascular

Selepressin Blocks Endothelial Barrier Dysfunction

Nektarios Barabutis, Margarita Marinova, Pavel Solopov, Mohammad A. Uddin, Glenn E. Croston, Torsten M. Reinheimer and John D. Catravas
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics November 1, 2020, 375 (2) 286-295; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.120.000146

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Research ArticleCardiovascular

Selepressin Blocks Endothelial Barrier Dysfunction

Nektarios Barabutis, Margarita Marinova, Pavel Solopov, Mohammad A. Uddin, Glenn E. Croston, Torsten M. Reinheimer and John D. Catravas
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics November 1, 2020, 375 (2) 286-295; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.120.000146
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Authorship Contributions
    • Footnotes
    • Abbreviations
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • HFpEF, Obesity and Hypertension
  • Controlled LDL Cholesterol reduces CV events
  • Compression no-reflow in intestinal ischemia-reperfusion
Show more Cardiovascular

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About JPET
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-0103 (Online)

Copyright © 2023 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics