Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit jpet on Facebook
  • Follow jpet on Twitter
  • Follow jpet on LinkedIn
Research ArticleSpecial Section on Sexual Dimorphism in Neuroimmune Cells

Sex Differences in the Inflammatory Consequences of Stress: Implications for Pharmacotherapy

Gustavo A. Martinez-Muniz and Susan K. Wood
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics October 2020, 375 (1) 161-174; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.120.266205
Gustavo A. Martinez-Muniz
Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Neuroscience, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, South Carolina and Dorn Veterans Administration Medical Center, Columbia, South Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan K. Wood
Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Neuroscience, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, South Carolina and Dorn Veterans Administration Medical Center, Columbia, South Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Women are at significantly greater risk of developing stress-related disorders such as depression. The increased risk begins during puberty and continues throughout life until menopause, suggesting a role for ovarian hormones in this increased susceptibility. Importantly, inflammation has been gaining momentum in its role in the pathogenesis of depression. Herein, clinical and preclinical studies have been reviewed to better understand how sex differences within the immune system may contribute to exaggerated risk of depression in females. First, studies that investigate the ability of psychologic stress episodes to engage the inflammatory systems both in the brain and periphery are reviewed with a special focus on sex-specific effects. Moreover, studies are discussed that identify whether imbalanced inflammatory milieu contributes to the development of depression in males versus females and whether these effects are regulated by estradiol. Importantly, we propose a locus coeruleus–norepinephrine–cytokine circuit as a conduit through which stress could increase stress susceptibly in females. Finally, the anti-inflammatory capacity of traditional and nontraditional antidepressants is investigated, with the goal of providing a better understanding of pharmacotherapeutics to enhance strategies to personalize antidepressant treatments between the sexes. The studies reviewed herein strongly support the need for further studies to elucidate whether females are especially sensitive to anti-inflammatory compounds as adjuvants to traditional therapies.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Women have hve an increased risk of developing stress-related disorders such as depression. In this review, literature from clinical and preclinical studies are integrated to define sex differences in stress-induced inflammatory responses as a potential source for the etiology of sex differences in depressive disorders. Moreover, the anti-inflammatory capacity of traditional and nontraditional antidepressants is reviewed to inform on potential pharmacotherapeutic strategies to personalize antidepressant therapy in a sex-dependent manner.

Introduction

Depression is one of the most debilitating diseases in the United States (Almeida, 2005) and, globally, is considered a significant source of disability (Reddy, 2010). Despite improvements in overall health and life expectancy in the United States, the incidence of depressive disorders has steadily increased since the 1990s (Murray et al., 2013), and recently, it has been reported to occur in 7.3% of adults and 12.7% of adolescents in the United States (Weinberger et al., 2018) and other countries, including Canada (Patten et al., 2006). Although reports from the World Health Organization identify that depression can be precipitated by medications, illnesses, substance use disorders, or genetics, research in humans and animals identify that exposure to stress remains a significant risk factor for the development of major depression (Krishnan and Nestler, 2008). However, it should be noted that rather than definitive mechanisms that promote depression in humans, our knowledge is largely limited to a list of factors that increase the risk of developing depression. Beyond stressful life experiences increasing risk of depression, there is also a robust sex difference whereby women are nearly twice as likely as men to suffer from depression (Kessler et al., 1993; Weissman et al., 1993; Marcus et al., 2005). In fact, this differential risk of depression is recognized globally in developed countries, suggesting that the female sex bias may be routed more from biologic sex differences rather than race, diet, education, or other factors (Rai et al., 2013). Despite the recognition that the incidence of depression is biased toward females, the etiology of this sex difference is unclear, which impedes progress for the development of precision medicine.

Despite evidence of exaggerated inflammation associated with major depression and several proof-of-concept studies demonstrating the efficacy of anti-inflammatory therapy as antidepressants, there remain several key questions that will be discussed in this Minireview using evidence from human and rodent studies. First, studies that investigate the ability of psychologic stress episodes to engage the inflammatory systems in both the brain and periphery will be reviewed. Moreover, studies identifying whether imbalanced inflammatory milieu contributes to the development of depression will be discussed. Throughout this Minireview, we will provide an introduction to available literature defining the sex differences in stress-induced inflammatory responses as a potential source for the etiology of sex differences in stress-related disorders. Finally, recent advances in strategies to treat depression will be reviewed, with the goal of providing a better understanding of pharmacotherapeutics resulting in modifications to immune levels in depression to enhance strategies for precision medicine.

Recruitment of the Innate Immune Response after Psychological Stress

Inflammatory Response to Experimental Models of Stress in Men and Women.

Meta-analysis of studies conducting controlled, acute psychologic stressors in humans identified consistent and robust increases in circulating inflammatory factors (Steptoe et al., 2007). The Trier social stress test (TSST) has been used for more than 2 decades as a way to reliably evaluate the response to social stressors in humans in a controlled laboratory setting (Kirschbaum et al., 1993). This model induces stress by placing participants in a situation in which they are required to make an interview-style presentation, followed immediately by an unexpected mental arithmetic test. This test is conducted in front of a panel of judges lacking any feedback or encouragement, eliciting a highly stressful experience (Kirschbaum et al., 1993; Allen et al., 2016). The TSST has been shown to elicit elevated levels of both IL-6 and TNF-α in healthy controls (Gaab et al., 2005). Moreover, patients suffering from depression exhibit significantly increased TSST-induced IL-6 levels above that of nondepressed controls (Pace et al., 2006). Another study using the TSST compared the immune responses between men and women, showing that women in the luteal phase of their menstrual cycle demonstrated increased lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced cytokine production in blood samples collected after stress, whereas men exhibited a reduction (Rohleder et al., 2001). A similar study focused on female participants who used oral contraceptives, comparing them with participants who were in the luteal phase of their menstrual cycle (Rohleder et al., 2003). The findings from this study showed that women who used contraceptives had higher levels of IL-6 after exposure to TSST. Contraceptive users also had a blunted glucocorticoid sensitivity when compared with women in the luteal phase of their menstrual cycle (Rohleder et al., 2003). It has also been demonstrated that women and men exhibit differing time courses of stress-induced cytokine release. For example, in a study using a mental arithmetic stress task, the paced auditory serial addition task (PASAT), male participants exhibited stress-induced IL-6 release that peaked 30 minutes after the PASAT but returned toward baseline by 60 minutes. IL-6 release in female participants, on the other hand,increased only only 60 minutes after the PASAT (Edwards et al., 2006). Taken together, the distinct inflammatory response to social stress in females may underlie the increased sensitivity women demonstrate to social stressors and may promote the increased risk of stress-related psychiatric disorders (Slavich and Irwin, 2014; Slavich and Sacher, 2019).

Inflammatory Response to Preclinical Models of Stress in Male and Female Rodents.

Preclinical studies have also shed considerable light on immune system activation in response to social and psychologic stress in experimental models; therefore, this concept will only be briefly reviewed below (for reviews, see Bekhbat and Neigh (2018), Finnell and Wood (2018), Rainville and Hodes (2019)). For example, in response to foot shock (Blandino et al., 2013; Jones et al., 2018), an established psychological stressor whereby the animal receives brief, mild, and inescapable electric shocks, IL-1β gene expression in the paraventricular nucleus is robustly increased (Blandino et al., 2013). Moreover, the effect of foot shock on inflammatory cytokines also occurs in extrahypothalamic regions; immunohistochemical analysis demonstrates that foot shock can ultimately increase the levels of IL-1β protein within the hippocampus (Jones et al., 2018). Moreover, a recent study also evaluated sex differences in the inflammatory response to an LPS injection 24 hours after inescapable shock. Peripheral cytokine release was potentiated in females with a history of stress compared with stressed males or unstressed males or females (Fonken et al., 2018). In the hippocampus, both males and females exhibited enhanced stress-induced neuroinflammation, yet the priming was proposed to occur through different mechanisms (Fonken et al., 2018). Importantly, this inflammation-enhancing effect of stress is not limited to foot shock. Chronic mild stress (CMS) or chronic variable stress, an experimental stressor whereby the subject is placed under mild and ever-changing stress-provoking conditions (Hodes et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2018; Johnson et al., 2020), has been shown to cause an increase in gene expression for inflammatory factors such as IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α in the hippocampus (Wang et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2019). In studies directly identifying sex-specific effects of CMS on hippocampal inflammation, both males and females demonstrated increased proinflammatory cytokines, but males exhibited increases in mRNA induced nitrous oxide synthase and IL-1β, whereas females demonstrated increases in TNF-α and reductions in anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 and IL-1 receptor antagonist (Liu et al., 2019). Moreover, ratios of pro- to anti-inflammatory cytokines indicated that females were more prone to a proinflammatory environment. Moreover, chronic stress during adolescence resulted in increased expression of IL-1β mRNA within the hippocampus of adult females, but not males (Bekhbat et al., 2019). Furthermore, in males, the use of minocycline was shown to dampen the activation of stress-induced proinflammatory responses in the brain, indicating that these cytokines are sourced from microglia, the resident immune cells of the brain (Wang et al., 2018). CMS has also been shown to induce microglial activation and cytokine release within the prefrontal cortex, but this effect was most pronounced in males, despite both males and females demonstrating depressive-like and anxiety-like behaviors (Wohleb et al., 2018). Importantly, a separate study also identified that females are more sensitive to a subchronic regimen of chronic variable stress compared with males as measured by behavioral sensitivity (Hodes et al., 2015).

Similar to the TSST in humans, experimental models of social stressors are also commonly used to generate an ethologically relevant stress exposure for rodents. One of the most commonly used of the social paradigms is the resident-intruder social defeat test, originally developed by Miczek (1979). This paradigm induces stress by introducing an experimental male into the home cage of an older, more aggressive, territorial male. The social defeat paradigm, like the TSST, is well recognized to stimulate the immune response in rodents (Wohleb et al., 2012; Wood et al., 2015; Tang et al., 2018). Social stress–induced activation of immune cells in the brain causes a prolonged inflammatory response and release of IL-1β (Wohleb et al., 2012). Moreover, long-lasting increases in neuroinflammation have been identified in the locus coeruleus (LC), a major noradrenergic nucleus, of a susceptible subset of male rats, whereas this response was lacking in the behaviorally resilient subset (Wood et al., 2015; Finnell et al., 2017a). Conducting social defeat stress in female rats has been a challenge because male rats are not aggressive toward females, and female rats are not aggressive toward other females outside of the postpartum period [see review Finnell and Wood (2016)]. One study used a designer receptor exclusively activated by designer drug-based activation of the ventromedial hypothalamus to induce male aggressive behavior toward females and determined that this modified version of social defeat produced behavioral and peripheral/central immune dysfunction in females (Yin et al., 2019). Alternatively, another strategy to subject females and males to social stress is by exposing rats or mice to a witness or vicarious stress, whereby a male or female is forced to witness social defeat occurring between two males (Hodes et al., 2014; Patki et al., 2014; Finnell et al., 2017b, 2018; (Iñiguez et al., 2018). These studies have highlighted that witness stress engages a heightened immune response within the periphery and the central nervous system, and that this immune response is involved in sensitivity to this stressor. Future studies directly comparing the immune response to witness stress between males and females will be critical in understanding sex differences in social stress–induced inflammation.

Sex-Specific Effects of Stress-Induced Activation of Microglia: A Link to Noradrenergic Hyperarousal.

Stress-induced promotion of a proinflammatory milieu is suggested to occur by several specific mechanisms, including microglial activation and blood-brain barrier degradation [(Menard et al., 2017; Dudek et al., 2020) and as extensively reviewed in Finnell and Wood (2018)]. The mechanism we will focus on for the purpose of this Minireview is microglial activation because of the experimental evidence supporting a role for sex differences in stress-induced microglial activation. Microglial cells are capable of changing morphology between a proinflammatory (M1) and anti-inflammatory (M2) state (Hanisch and Kettenmann, 2007; Crain et al., 2013; Nelson et al., 2017). Microglia, when activated by stress, for example, shift morphology states from a ramified surveillant state to an ameboid, activated state, leading to the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines such as Il-1β, IL-6, and TNF to neighboring cells (Hanisch and Kettenmann, 2007; Nelson et al., 2017). Importantly, female rats exhibit more activated microglia as demonstrated by morphology beginning near the time of early puberty and continuing throughout adulthood (Schwarz et al., 2012). As we discuss later in this review, this timeframe coincides with the period of greatest risk of depression in females. In addition, the prefrontal cortex of unstressed female rats has demonstrated heightened basal activation of microglia evidenced by a primed phenotype (Bollinger et al., 2016). Interestingly, a primed or sensitized microglial phenotype is most commonly noted to occur after stress exposure (Frank et al., 2012, 2018; Fonken et al., 2018). Importantly, Bollinger et al. (2017) went on to determine whether acute or chronic restraint stress affected microglial morphology in a sex-dependent manner. In the orbitofrontal cortex, basolateral amygdala, and dorsal hippocampus, chronic stress reduced microglial activation (as evidenced by morphology changes) yet upregulated a greater number of immune factors in females compared with males. It will be important to determine whether similar effects on microglial morphology are also achieved with social stress; however, these findings provide evidence of sex differences in microglial morphology that may bias females toward greater neuroinflammatory responses in the context of stress.

Microglial-induced increases in proinflammatory cytokines no doubt have various effects throughout the brain depending on the specific brain region and cell type. One brain nucleus through which proinflammatory cytokines are likely acting to promote stress sensitivity is the LC. IL-1β microinjection into the LC increased burst firing of LC neurons (Borsody and Weiss, 2002–2003), an LC response that occurs after a sensory stimulus (Aston-Jones and Bloom, 1981a,b). Moreover, both peripheral and intra-LC injection of LPS increased LC-NE firing, dependent upon IL-1 receptors within the LC (Borsody and Weiss, 2002–2003, 2004). Importantly, LC-norepinephrine (NE) dysfunction is linked to stress-related disorders such as depression and PTSD, and as discussed above, females already demonstrate distinct differences within the LC-NE system capable of promoting stress-related dysfunction. Combined with the knowledge that females demonstrate increased inflammatory responses to social stressors, as discussed above, this begs the question as to whether exaggerated inflammatory input to the LC could be serving as the conduit through which stress increases risk of stress-related disorders in females.

A recent study provided key information as to the mechanisms driving the elevated inflammation in the context of stress. NE regulates cytokine release from macrophages and microglia via binding to adrenergic receptors on these cell types. Finnell et al.(2019) challenged the contribution of the LC-NE system in male rats on stress-induced circulating and neuroinflammatory priming by using the compound N-(2-chloroethyl)-N-ethyl-2-bromobenzylamine, an LC-selective noradrenergic neurotoxin. These studies demonstrated that suppressed NE release in N-(2-chloroethyl)-N-ethyl-2-bromobenzylamine–treated rats had a significant impact on stress-induced inflammation in the plasma and brain (Finnell et al., 2019). Importantly, these findings clearly indicated that the LC-NE system was necessary for the stress-induced inflammatory priming known to occur after social defeat stress (Frank et al., 2015). The recognition that the LC-NE system is capable of regulating stress-related inflammation opens a path for future studies to understand possible treatment pathways. Although this study did not assess sex differences, it is noteworthy that there is robust sexual dimorphism within the LC-NE system. As is eloquently reviewed in Bangasser et al. (2016), sex differences in the LC-NE system may serve as a core pathophysiological mechanism that predisposes women to disorders that are characterized by hyperarousal, such as depression and PTSD. In brief, the LC of adult female rats is larger than that of adult males because of an increase in the number of NE-containing neurons in females (Luque et al., 1992) and because the dendrites of the LC are denser than those of males (Bangasser et al., 2011), potentially increasing synaptic connectivity with other stress-related brain regions. Moreover, estrogen increases NE levels in various stress-sensitive brain regions through ERα or ERβ (Lubbers et al., 2010). Both ER subtypes are prevalent in the LC (Shughrue et al., 1997) and are therefore well positioned to regulate NE release from the LC to stress-sensitive target regions. Within NE-containing nuclei, estradiol is capable of increasing NE synthesis by enhancing the expression of tyrosine hydroxylase, a rate-limiting enzyme critical to the synthesis of NE (Serova et al., 2002). Moreover, estradiol is also capable of impeding enzymatic degradation of NE via inhibiting catechol-O-methyltransferase (Jiang et al., 2003).

Link between Inflammation and Depression

Inflammation’s Link to Depression in Humans.

In humans with major depressive disorder (MDD), high levels of proinflammatory cytokines have been identified in subsets of patients. For example, proinflammatory cytokines have been found in high levels in both the cerebrospinal fluid and the serum of depressed patients (Zorrilla et al., 2001; Miller et al., 2002; Alesci et al., 2005; Motivala et al., 2005; Maes et al., 2009; Raison et al., 2013). Overall, meta-analyses lend support to the presence of increased inflammation in MDD; however, there are individual studies that report no such association (Fried et al., 2019). Furthermore, one meta-analysis suggests that this variability is due to different types of depression; Lamers et al. (2013) found the association between depression and inflammation only evident for atypical depression rather than melancholic depression. Nonetheless, alterations in cytokines in the central and peripheral nervous systems were highly correlated with the severity of the symptoms of depression (Zorrilla et al., 2001). Moreover, in patients with MDD, markers of activated microglia, such as translocator protein, have been shown to be elevated in serum and brain and represent a candidate marker of treatment outcome (Setiawan et al., 2015; Holmes et al., 2018; Richards et al., 2018). Beyond the correlational studies linking markers of inflammation and depression, inflammatory factors have also been shown to have a causal effect on MDD symptoms, such as cognitive dysfunction, sleep alterations, and regular fatigue, which are all associated with depression (Bower et al., 2002; Meyers et al., 2005; Motivala et al., 2005). Moreover, cytokine treatment of diseases that are unrelated to depression have a high probability of leading patients to develop depression and anxiety (Miller et al., 2009). Use of cytokines such as IL-2, interferon (IFN)-α, IFN-γ, and granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor for cancer treatment have been shown to cause depression in patients with no prior history (Denicoff et al., 1987; Renault et al., 1987; Capuron et al., 2001; Schmeler et al., 2009). Indeed, the use of antidepressants such as paroxetine counteracts the effects of depression induced by IFN-α treatment, further supporting the concept that cytokines can independently produce depressive symptoms (Musselman et al., 2001a). Furthermore, studies have shown that females may demonstrate greater risk for MDD after inflammatory challenges, such as IFN-α, compared with men (Fontana et al., 2002; Koskinas et al., 2002; Gohier et al., 2003). However, not all studies support this sex-biased interpretation, with some research reporting no sex differences in depressive symptoms after IFN-α administration (Bonaccorso et al., 2002; Kraus et al., 2003; Raison et al., 2005). Despite these inconsistent findings, a larger meta-analysis that included 26 studies concluded that females are significantly more likely to develop MDD after IFN-α administration (Udina et al., 2012).

There is also support for sex differences in markers associated with MDD. Various sex-dependent markers for MDD were identified from the serum of both male and female patients (Ramsey et al., 2016). Only three female-specific markers were identified for MDD. Insulin-like growth factor 5, involved in biologic processes including cell growth and glucose metabolism, and macrophage inflammatory protein-3β, a chemokine that regulates lymphocyte recirculation, were both reduced in MDD females. Interestingly, the third female-specific marker was a reduction in IL-2 receptor α. Although IL-2 receptor α has no functional response on its own, it is one of three critical subunits necessary for IL-2 receptor function. As such, these data may provide insight into adaptations that are occurring in females with MDD versus males. Furthermore, a systematic study performed by Labaka et al. (2018) showed that women with MDD had higher levels of IL-6, leptin, α-[11C]Methyl-L tryptophan, and S100B in their serum when compared with men with comparable depression. These specific markers are indicators of the presence of a high inflammatory response, further associating acute inflammation with MDD in a sexually dimorphic manner. Their findings also demonstrate a link between the severity of depressive symptoms with the levels of IL-1β, TNF-α, C-reactive protein, and brain-derived neurotropic factor present in individuals, which are common proinflammatory markers (Labaka et al., 2018).

Inflammation’s Link to Depressive-Like Behaviors in Experimental Models in Humans and Rodents.

Findings from experimental stressors in humans also support the link between inflammation and depression. As discussed in Recruitment of the Innate Immune Response after Psychologic Stress, the experimental social stressor in humans, the TSST, activates cytokine release in healthy controls. However, patients suffering from depression exhibit significantly higher TSST-induced IL-6 levels than healthy controls (Pace and Miller, 2009). It is also noteworthy that the inflammatory response to the TSST is positively related to depressive symptom severity, even well below clinical thresholds for depression. For example, Fagundes et al. (2013) measured the IL-6 response to a TSST paradigm in subjects with depressive symptoms within the 75th and 25th percentile on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, representing a score of 10 and 2, respectively, in which 16 is the clinical threshold for depression. This study identified that the subject population that fell within the 75th percentile for depressive symptoms exhibited greater TSST-induced IL-6 release as measured in plasma compared with those in the 25th percentile. Taken together, these studies support a strong association between social stress–induced cytokine release and severity of depressive symptomatology.

Experimental stressors in rodents also demonstrate similar trends whereby the impact of stress on later indices of depression-like behavior are strongly dependent on the levels of cytokines in the central and peripheral nervous systems (Hodes et al., 2014; Finnell et al., 2017b, 2019; Menard et al., 2017). Similar to humans, mice and rats exposed to repeated social stress exhibit individual differences in susceptibility to developing a depressive-like phenotype (Krishnan et al., 2007; Hodes et al., 2014; Wood et al., 2015; Finnell et al., 2017a). Moreover, the stress-susceptible phenotype is characterized by enhanced circulating (Hodes et al., 2014) and brain inflammation (Wood et al., 2015; Finnell et al., 2017a), a profile that is not observed in resilient rodents [for reviews on this topic, see (Finnell and Wood, 2018; Tsyglakova et al., 2019)]. These studies have been insightful in revealing the central and peripheral mechanisms contributing to susceptibility. Studies in mice identified that the susceptible phenotype was characterized by high levels of monocyte-derived IL-6 in serum and that neutralizing IL-6 in various ways rescued the phenotype (Hodes et al., 2014). In rats, studies have confirmed the neuroinflammatory contribution to a susceptible phenotype, identifying that IL-1β is elevated long-term in the stress-sensitive noradrenergic LC (Wood et al., 2015; Finnell et al., 2019). Importantly, blocking activation of the IL-1 receptor in brain (Wood et al., 2015) or utilizing high doses of resveratrol that reduced LC cytokine expression (Finnell et al., 2017a) was sufficient to rescue the anhedonic phenotype in susceptible rats. Taken together, these studies have provided support for a causal role of inflammation in a stress-susceptible, depressive-like phenotype in preclinical studies.

Impact of Ovarian Hormones on Behavioral and Immune Responses to Stress

Exaggerated Inflammatory Responses to Endotoxin and Stress Challenges in Women.

Several clinical reports indicate that women are more likely than men to be diagnosed with depression (Weissman and Klerman, 1992; Gallo et al., 1993; Kessler et al., 1993; Hankin et al., 1998), and establishing the basis for these differences provides a framework for understanding how these disparities emerge and potential avenues for therapeutic intervention. In fact, there is a 2-fold increased risk for depression in women, but only during certain age ranges; the elevated risk emerges at the onset of puberty, persists into adulthood (Kessler et al., 1993; Hankin et al., 1998; Nolen-Hoeksema, 2001), and is no longer evident after menopause (Kessler et al., 1993; Hankin et al., 1998). These findings strongly suggest that ovarian hormones may contribute to elevated susceptibility to stress in females. Although there is a lack of controlled studies determining whether inflammation plays a role in this elevated risk for depression, there are several lines of clinical evidence that suggest women are more sensitive to inflammatory stimuli. Two key studies have provided considerable insight into sex differences in the inflammatory and depressogenic effects of endotoxin administration (LPS). In a study published by Engler et al. (2016), a low dose of LPS (0.4 ng/kg) elicited depressive symptoms in both males and females, yet the cytokine response was distinct; women exhibited robust increases in proinflammatory IL-6 and TNF-α compared with men, whereas men responded with approximately 3 times higher serum levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. In a similar double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study, the acute response to low-dose endotoxin challenge of 0.8 ng/kg LPS, twice the dose of that administered in Engler et al., was also determined. Women exhibited a dramatic induction of depressive behaviors, whereas men did not, despite exhibiting similar levels of endotoxin-induced IL-6 and TNF-α (Moieni et al., 2015). It is noteworthy that Moieni et al. did not measure anti-inflammatory cytokines; thus, it begs the question as to whether IL-10, for example, was elevated selectively in men, thereby protecting against the depressogenic effects of this dose of LPS. Taken together, these findings could support the notion that the cytokine response to LPS in women is more sensitive to lower doses and, as doses escalate, that males and females demonstrate differential cytokine profiles that bias females toward proinflammatory and depressive responses, whereas males may be biased toward anti-inflammatory protective pathways. These studies highlight the need to better understand sexual dimorphism in inflammatory responses, especially considering that low endotoxin administration may elicit a similar immune response to that of social stress exposure.

As might be expected, greater exposure to life stressors of an interpersonal nature is associated with a significantly increased risk for depression in many populations, including adolescent girls. Moreover, women exhibit greater immune responses after stressful experiences and also display greater depressive symptoms when compared with controls (Miller and Cole, 2012; Giletta et al., 2018; Sullivan et al., 2018). Strikingly, one study went on to identify that the association between social stress exposure and increased risk of depression was only true for girls that exhibited a strong cytokine reaction to a laboratory-based social stressor (Slavich et al., 2020). This important study indicates that inflammation may be a critical factor linking stress exposure with increased risk of depression in females. Finally, beyond stress exposure, diseases of an inflammatory nature, such as cardiovascular disease, can also lead to a higher predisposition of the development of depression (Bucciarelli et al., 2019). In all, there is considerable support for the notion that women have a greater overall inflammatory response to endotoxin and social stressors, which may play a role in the significantly increased risk of depression evident in the female population.

Role of Ovarian Hormones in Stress-Related Inflammatory and Behavioral Responses.

Estradiol is poised to regulate microglial function, with estradiol receptors present on macrophages and microglia (Mor et al., 1999). In the absence of stress, estradiol has been shown to have dual effects on inflammation under certain conditions and is largely dose-dependent (Straub, 2007). For example, low levels of estradiol, but not progesterone or high levels of estradiol, increased IFN-γ in mitogen-activated human mononuclear leukocytes in whole blood (Matalka, 2003). Preclinical studies have sought to understand the role of this sex hormone on microglial inflammatory responses, yet findings are equivocal. There is a strong body of evidence that estradiol exerts anti-inflammatory effects on microglia after cerebral ischemia (Rahimian et al., 2019). Yet even in studies that report evidence of general microglial inhibition by estradiol, some report elevated proinflammatory cytokines concurrently in the same samples (Baker et al., 2004). Moreover, estradiol may serve a distinct role for microglia beyond ischemic events that are highly sensitive to the route of administration. For example, one study points to the critical importance of route of exposure of estradiol in differentiating a pro- versus anti-inflammatory effect on microglia from a healthy brain (Loram et al., 2012); when female rats were ovariectomized and administered estradiol in vivo followed by microglial isolation, microglia exhibited a dose-dependent increase in IL-1β production. Alternatively, when microglial cultures were isolated from ovariectomized females and exposed to estradiol ex vivo, estradiol produced an anti-inflammatory effect (Loram et al., 2012). In addition, ovarian hormones also exacerbate social stress–induced inflammatory responses, as evidenced by studies that have exposed females to repeatedly (five daily) witnessing brief social defeat episodes between two males in the resident-intruder paradigm (witness stress). For example, re-exposure to the resident’s cage in the absence of the aggressive resident rendered intact females to respond with a robust increase in proinflammatory cytokines above that of intact females with a history of nonstress control. In comparison, ovariectomized females with a history of witness stress responded with less cytokine release than that of ovariectomized rats with a history of control (Finnell et al., 2018). It should also be noted that the same paradigm was tested in males in a separate study from the same laboratory, and males with a history of witness stress did not exhibit increased inflammatory responses to being re-exposed to the resident’s cage (Finnell et al., 2017b).

Beyond the estradiol regulation of microglia, the HPA axis is another potential source of variation in immune stress responses between sexes (Miller and Raison, 2016; Bekhbat and Neigh, 2018). Cortisol is a well recognized, potent anti-inflammatory hormone. Notably, women and female rodents generally exhibit enhanced stress-induced activation of the HPA axis [for a comprehensive review on this topic, see Goel et al. (2014)]. However, women in the follicular phase of their menstrual cycle (and thus comparable progesterone levels to men) exhibit suppressed HPA axis reactivity in response to the TSST when compared with men, as demonstrated by decreased Adrenocorticotropic hormone and cortisol levels (Stephens et al., 2016). Further, this study confirmed that sex hormones were correlated with cortisol levels, thereby linking sex hormones with stress-induced cortisol responses in men and women. In support of these clinical findings, sex differences in corticosterone regulation of repeated stress-induced inflammation in rodents is also well recognized (Barnard et al., 2019). Taken together, these clinical and preclinical studies provide evidence whereby, through modulating release of the anti-inflammatory hormone cortisol in the context of social stress or through direct regulation of microglia via estrogen receptors, sex hormones may be promoting exaggerated inflammatory responses in females and anti-inflammatory responses in males.

Just as the role of ovarian hormones on inflammation is highly equivocal, so too are the effects of sex hormones on depressive-like behaviors in rodent models (Table 1). In females, in addition to the overall increased risk of depression between puberty and menopause, times of hormonal fluctuation such as postpartum and perimenopausal periods represent times of further enhanced risk of depression (Soares and Zitek, 2008). Moreover, when postmenopausal women are treated with estradiol daily for 3 months, ratings of negative mood and anxiety are elevated following the TSST as compared with placebo treated volunteers (Newhouse et al., 2010). Thus, in vivo studies have investigated the role of ovariectomizing rats, thus removing estradiol and progesterone, in a middle-aged model and found that long-term ovariectomy (4 months) enhanced a depressive-like phenotype after chronic unpredictable stress (Mahmoud et al., 2016). Although these findings deviate from human literature suggesting that fluctuations, rather than long-term removal of ovarian hormones, are what increase susceptibility, these studies concluded that ovarian hormones served a protective role in rats exposed to chronic stress. Other studies in unstressed adult female rats found similar effects when the process of ovariectomizing increased immobility in the FST compared with intact and sham rats (Li et al., 2014). However, body weight (and likely greater fat distribution) was increased by ovariectomy, and general locomotor activity was reduced in the ovariectomized group (Li et al., 2014); thus, these potential confounds of the behavioral findings cannot be ruled out. Moreover, although this and other studies (Rachman et al., 1998; Li et al., 2014) also determined that estradiol replacement could rescue the effects of ovariectomy, estradiol administration occurred by seven daily injections rather than cyclic administration (once every 4 days), which mimics the normal cycle. Alternative to studies reporting a behaviorally protective effect of estradiol, there is also considerable evidence from studies supporting that estradiol exacerbates stress sensitivity. For example, when gonadally intact and ovariectomized female mice were exposed to chronic unpredictable stress, ovariectomy conferred protection against stress-induced immobility in the FST (LaPlant et al., 2009). In addition, Shansky et al. (2004) identified that intact cycling females were more sensitive to mild natural stressors and pharmacological stressors compared with males and ovariectomized females. When intact females were further separated based on estrous cycle stage, it was clear that the heightened sensitivity occurred during proestrus and could be reinstated in ovariectomized rats after estradiol replacement (Shansky et al., 2004). Moreover, studies testing the effects of ovarian hormones on susceptibility to social stressors have reported similar findings. When testing the behavioral responses to witness stress, intact females were exquisitely sensitive to this test, demonstrating anxiety-like responses during the stressor and development of depressive-like responses the following week as measured by the sucrose preference and FST (Finnell et al., 2018). Strikingly, ovariectomized females were resistant to these behavioral adaptations during and after social stress. Moreover, estradiol administration reinstated the behavioral response during witness stress in ovariectomized females, yet administration was also daily via a time-release pellet and thus not recapitulating the cycle (Finnell et al., 2018). In all, these data speak to the clear divergent effects that ovarian hormones may produce on stress susceptibility, potentially dependent upon age of animals, length of time past ovariectomy, dosing regimen for estradiol replacement, and type of stress paradigm (or lack of stress exposure). More controlled studies are needed to determine under what conditions ovarian hormones are behaviorally protective versus deleterious.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Impact of ovarian hormones on behavior and stress susceptibility

Impact of Antidepressant Therapy on Inflammation

As discussed earlier, stress dramatically activates inflammatory processes such as microglial activation and cytokine release and is known to contribute to stress-induced MDD (and behavioral dysfunction in rodents). Moreover, growing evidence supports the notion that exaggerated activation of the innate immune system may play a significant role in the pathogenesis of MDD and anxiety disorders in patients. In fact, several studies have linked treatment resistance to increased proinflammatory cytokines or microglial activation (Maes et al., 1997; Musselman et al., 2001b; Alesci et al., 2005; Motivala et al., 2005; Miller et al., 2009; Raison et al., 2013; Setiawan et al., 2015; Kiraly et al., 2017). As such, there are several important therapeutic considerations that we have investigated in the following section: 1) whether current efficacious treatment of stress-related psychiatric disorders impact cytokine expression, 2) whether anti-inflammatory therapies may serve as antidepressants in certain patient populations, and 3) whether there are known sex differences in these therapies.

Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Antidepressant Compounds.

Inflammation is greatly associated with the pathogenesis of depression (Hannestad et al., 2011; Gao et al., 2019). Moreover, patients treated with antidepressants show lower plasma levels of proinflammatory cytokines (Hannestad et al., 2011); however, it is unclear whether the anti-inflammatory effects of these drugs contribute to the antidepressant efficacy. Data presented by Hannestad et al. report that antidepressant treatment appears to lower the levels of IL-1β in the serum of patients treated for MDD while having little to no effect on the levels of TNF-α and IL-6 present in the serum. Moreover, although it is unclear as to whether the anti-inflammatory effects of antidepressants contribute to their antidepressant efficacy, it is striking that some studies report that cytokine changes predict the therapeutic response. For example, in a study testing the tricyclic amitriptyline, patients with MDD exhibited greater TNF-α plasma levels than nondepressed controls, and a reduction in TNF-α levels after 6 weeks of treatment predicted those who responded to the drug, whereas nonresponders lacked a significant anti-inflammatory effect after treatment (Lanquillon et al., 2000). Unfortunately, to our knowledge, it is not known whether sex differences exist in the anti-inflammatory effects of antidepressant compounds. However, given the significant number of sex differences in the pharmacokinetics of antidepressants based on differences in the rates of gastric emptying, amount of adipose tissue, and estrogenic regulation of cytochrome P450, as reviewed in LeGates et al. (2019), it would be expected.

The impact of antidepressants on inflammation is also supported by preclinical findings. For example, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor imipramine has been shown to decrease levels of microglial reactivity in rats exposed to an endotoxin stress (LPS) and a social stressor (repeated social defeat), while also attenuating the expression of TNF-α and IL-1β, although levels of IL-6 did not appear to be affected by this drug (Ramirez et al., 2015). In rats exposed to chronic social isolation stress, treatment with the antidepressant fluoxetine and the antipsychotic clozapine reduced the amount of TNF-α present in the hippocampus (Todorović and Filipović, 2017). The ability of antidepressants to inhibit microglial function has also been supported by findings in microglial cell culture. For example, three different antidepressants were shown to inhibit IFN-γ–induced microglial production of IL-6 and nitric oxide: the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluvoxamine, the noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor reboxetine, and the nonselective monoaminergic reuptake inhibitor imipramine (Hashioka et al., 2007). Alternatively, this study also demonstrated that lithium chloride (a mood stabilizer), enhanced IL-6 release yet inhibited nitric oxide. The effects of antidepressants on proinflammatory components can vary depending on the drug and the cytokine being studied, indicating that different antidepressants may hold a certain degree of anti-inflammatory effect but likely cannot be considered an overall treatment of stress-induced inflammation (Hashioka et al., 2007).

With the recognition of treatment resistance in up to 30% of patients with MDD (Al-Harbi, 2012), the use of alternative therapies is essential. (R,S)-Ketamine is an N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonist that is not a traditional antidepressant but does exhibit antidepressant efficacy in patients with MDD (Berman et al., 2000) and has been shown to buffer learned fear expression in rodent models (McGowan et al., 2017). Moreover, (R,S)-ketamine serves as a prophylactic against stress-induced depressive-like behaviors in rodent models (Brachman et al., 2016; Mastrodonato et al., 2018, 2020). In mice in which LPS was the inflammatory precursor to the depressive-like behavior, (R,S)-ketamine prior to exposure to LPS attenuated learned fear if treatment occurred 1 week before re-exposure to a stressful condition (Mastrodonato et al., 2020). However, if treated 1 month or 1 day before the stress exposure, (R,S)-ketamine was ineffective, indicating that the timing of the treatment is also essential in the efficacy of the drug (McGowan et al., 2017). Along with the attenuation of depressive-like behaviors, the use of (R,S)-ketamine has also been identified to exhibit anti-inflammatory properties. (R,S)-Ketamine was shown to inhibit LPS-induced serum levels of TNF-α and IL-1β (Clarke et al., 2017). Additionally, in adult rats that had been stressed through maternal deprivation at a young age, treatment with (R,S)-ketamine reduced serum levels for TNF-α, IL-1, and IL-6 (Réus et al., 2015). Although the efficacy of (R,S)-ketamine as an antidepressant is understood, much is yet to be explored as to its effects on inflammation, as well as possible sex differences that could be present in the use of this drug as treatment of MDD; however, a few studies in rodents do suggest that females may be more sensitive to the antidepressant-like effects of ketamine compared with males (Carrier and Kabbaj, 2013; Franceschelli et al., 2015).

Antidepressant-Like Effects of Anti-Inflammatory Compounds.

Considering the evidence that inflammatory molecules are capable of producing a depressive phenotype, anti-inflammatory compounds have been tested for their antidepressant efficacy in clinical trials. Etanercept, a TNF-α antagonist, was tested in patients with psoriasis and found to produce significant antidepressant efficacy above that of placebo (Tyring et al., 2006). Moreover, another TNF-α antagonist, infliximab was tested in another population of patients with MDD and was also shown to exhibit antidepressant efficacy (Raison et al., 2013). However, depressive symptoms were only reduced for the subset of patients that presented with high baseline levels of inflammation prior to treatment. This suggests that subpopulations of depressed patients with elevated inflammatory profiles may benefit from anti-inflammatory compounds as an anti-inflammatory or for use as an adjuvant to traditional treatment.

Studies evaluating sex differences in the antidepressant efficacy of anti-inflammatory compounds are limited. One such study evaluated sex differences in the behavioral response to chronic unpredictable stress in male and female mice (Wohleb et al., 2018). Although both sexes demonstrated the development of depressive- and anxiety-like behaviors, only male mice exhibited increased microglial activation in the prefrontal cortex. Therefore, viral-mediated knockdown of neuronal colony stimulating factor 1 to inhibit the activation of microglia in the prefrontal cortex was only tested in males (Wohleb et al., 2018) and did produce an antidepressant and anxiolytic effect. Sex differences in drug pharmacokinetics and controlled anti-inflammatory studies from other diseases, on the other hand, have shed light on how men and women respond differently to the same therapy. For example, it has long been recognized that aspirin, an effective anti-inflammatory compound, has distinctly different pharmacokinetics in males versus females; the drug is cleared more slowly and has a longer half-life in women, owing to the greater bioavailability in women than in men (Ho et al., 1985). In a randomized clinical trial of IFN-β for multiple sclerosis, women responded better to IFN-β than men (Secondary Progressive Efficacy Clinical Trial of Recombinant Interferon-Beta-1a in MS (SPECTRIMS) Study Group, 2001). Moreover, other findings in patients with rheumatoid arthritis reported that after anti-TNF compounds were administered, only female patients exhibited increased plasma adiponectin (Nagashima et al., 2008), a molecule responsible for its anti-inflammatory effects (Mangge et al., 2010). It should also be noted that women respond to TNF-α antagonists with shorter half-lives, highlighting the critical point that, for pharmacological treatments (Desroches et al., 2010), serum concentrations should be used to tailor the dosing regimen for optimal therapeutic outcomes. This also begs the question as to whether women, who have greater inflammatory responses to social stressors and greater autoimmune disorder risk, may benefit from anti-inflammatory therapy as antidepressants or adjuvants to traditional therapy to a greater extent than men.

Similar to findings in clinical reports, there is also considerable evidence to support an antidepressant-like effect of anti-inflammatory compounds in preclinical studies in rodents. For example, treatment via central administration of an IL-1 receptor antagonist to male rats prior to daily exposure to social defeat inhibited the development of anhedonia in the sucrose preference test (Wood et al., 2015). Similarly, using chronic unpredictable stress, IL-1 receptor antagonist or IL-1 receptor knockout mice blocked the development of anhedonia that occurred after stress (Koo and Duman, 2008). Moreover, inhibiting IL-6 during repeated social defeat stress also produces an antidepressant-like response in mice (Hodes et al., 2014). Although, to our knowledge, studies have not been conducted to assess sex differences in anti-inflammatory efficacy within stress models, the vast sexual dimorphism of the inflammatory system suggests that these anti-inflammatory compounds will likely exhibit differential effects in males versus females.

Flavonoids are metabolites commonly derived from a variety of plant life, such as fruits, vegetables, herbs, grains, and red wine (Erdman et al., 2007); they have been studied for their potential therapeutic properties, especially in their role as anti-inflammatory agents (Serafini et al., 2010; Farzaei et al., 2019). For example, avicularin, a quercetin derivative, decreased levels of proinflammatory cytokines and subsequent depressive-like behaviors in rodents exposed to chronic, unpredictable, mild stress (Shen et al., 2019). In addition, daily treatment with resveratrol prior to repeated social defeat in male rats proved anti-inflammatory (Finnell et al., 2017a). Moreover, resveratrol produced an antidepressant-like effect by blocking anhedonia in susceptible rats, but only at doses that were efficacious in blocking neuroinflammation within the LC. It is important to note that some flavonoids affect the regulation of many biologic processes, including that of hormones such as estrogens (Kao et al., 1998; Rathee et al., 2009). Certain subgroups of flavonoids, such as flavones, inhibit the production of estrogen, acting as a competitive inhibitor of the aromatases that serve as the precursor of the hormone (Kao et al., 1998). Understanding these sex differences in the potential off-target effects of these compounds is crucial when taking into consideration the treatment of women versus men. Another major pitfall of these compounds is that they are not selective for one system and have many effects beyond reducing inflammation. Zheng et al. (2013) identified that the antidepressant-like effect produced by the flavonoid used in their studies occurred through the compound’s actions within the D1/D2 dopamine receptors, rather than anti-inflammation alone.

Putative Anti-Inflammatory Effects of CRF Antagonists.

It has long been recognized that subsets of depressed patients exhibit elevated levels of the stress-related neuropeptide corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) (Owens and Nemeroff, 1991). Considerable evidence has now accumulated pointing toward inherent sex differences within the CRF system as a likely mechanism leading to enhanced stress susceptibility and thus increased rates of depression in the female population (Bangasser and Valentino, 2012; Bangasser and Wiersielis, 2018). Although research is far from elucidating the etiology of this health disparity, the molecular and cellular substrates identified in the CRF system that are differentially regulated in females versus males may consist of the most promising lines of evidence to understand exaggerated stress susceptibility in females (Bangasser and Valentino, 2012). It is notable that there is a bidirectional stimulatory relationship between cytokines and CRF (Dentino et al., 1999; Kageyama and Suda, 2009). Acute, short-term administration of CRF elicits anti-inflammatory effects through prostaglandin E2 synthesis (Tsatsanis et al., 2007), and although this study did not evaluate sex differences, female cells are known to release less prostaglandin E2 upon stimulation compared with male cells (Batres and Dupont, 1986). Alternatively, upon prolonged exposure to CRF (greater than 6 hours), a proinflammatory effect ensues, as measured by induction of TNF-α gene transcription (Wang et al., 2003; Tsatsanis et al., 2007). Importantly, a CRF1 antagonist is also capable of blocking the effect of cytokines on stress-related behaviors (Knapp et al., 2011). Thus, the exaggerated CRF system observed in women (Brady et al., 2009; Bangasser and Valentino, 2012) may contribute to the enhanced inflammatory responses to stressors in females (Cizza et al., 2009; Prather et al., 2009) and subsequent increased risk of suffering from depressive disorders.

Conclusions

With the long-recognized significant health disparity in MDD, i.e., women exhibiting twice the risk as men, it is surprising that we are not further in our understanding of how to personalize antidepressant treatments between the sexes (Kornstein et al., 2000). The fact that the majority of basic research studies have been conducted only in male subjects no doubt contributes to our lack of clarity on this subject. In the studies that do address this issue, vast sex differences have been identified in the pharmacokinetics of antidepressant therapies.

The female LC-NE system is well recognized to exhibit distinct morphological and neurochemical differences compared with males that predispose females to exaggerated LC-NE activity [as reviewed in Bangasser et al. (2016)]. As an extension of this knowledge, we propose that an LC-NE-cytokine circuit (Fig. 1) may serve as a conduit to increase stress susceptibility in females. Social stress–induced activation of the LC stimulates circulating NE release within the plasma and is necessary for the inflammatory priming that occurs after stress (Finnell et al., 2019). As a result, enhanced LC-NE activity in females can lead to hypersecretion of NE and, ultimately, increased circulating inflammation. Combined with evidence that peripheral inflammatory challenges serve to increase LC burst firing in an IL-1–dependent manner (Borsody and Weiss, 2004), we hypothesize that the exaggerated stress-induced inflammatory response evident in females may contribute to a feed-forward mechanism resulting in heightened IL-1β release in the periphery and exaggerated accumulation in the LC compared with males (Wood et al., 2010, 2015; Finnell et al., 2017a). This pathway is already primed to increase proinflammatory cytokine release in the face of stress and, given the knowledge that stress-induced LC-NE activity and cytokine responses are sensitized in females, suggests that this pathway may be hyperactive in stressed females versus males. Taken together, with the increasing appreciation for the role that inflammation may play in the pathogenesis of patients with MDD and the increased inflammatory stress responsivity observed in women, this favors the evaluation of anti-inflammatory therapies. In support of this, autoimmune disorders are also biased toward females and are comorbid with MDD, further highlighting the role that inflammatory cytokines may play in the pathogenesis of these stress-related psychiatric disorders. The studies reviewed herein strongly support the need for further studies to elucidate whether females are exquisitely sensitive to anti-inflammatory compounds as adjuvants to traditional therapies.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

LC-NE-cytokine circuit as a conduit through which stress could increase stress susceptibly in females. The female LC-NE system exhibits distinct morphological and neurochemical differences compared with males, predisposing females to exaggerated LC-NE activity [as reviewed in Bangasser et al. (2016)]. As an extension of this understanding, we propose that an LC-NE-cytokine circuit may serve as a conduit through which stress functions to increase stress susceptibility (and increased risk of depression) in females. Social stress–induced activation of the LC stimulates circulating NE release within the plasma. This LC-induced NE release stimulates the inflammatory priming that occurs after stress (Finnell et al., 2019). Thus, enhanced LC-NE activity in females can lead to NE hypersecretion and ultimately increased circulating inflammation. Combined with evidence that peripheral inflammatory challenges serve to increase LC burst firing via IL-1 within the LC (Borsody and Weiss, 2004), we hypothesize that the exaggerated stress-induced inflammatory response evident in females may contribute to a feed-forward mechanism resulting in LC-NE–induced elevations of IL-1β release in the periphery as well as exaggerated accumulation within the LC compared with males (Wood et al., 2010, 2015; Finnell et al., 2017a).

Authorship Contributions

Performed data analysis: Martinez-Muniz, Wood.

Wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript: Martinez-Muniz, Wood.

Footnotes

    • Received May 7, 2020.
    • Accepted July 28, 2020.
  • This work was supported by National Institutes of Health National Institute of Mental Health [Grant MH113892], the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation, National Alliance for Research in Schizophrenia and Depression Young Investigator Award [26809], and the Department of Veterans Affairs [I21 BX002664].

  • https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.120.266205.

Abbreviations

CMS
chronic mild stress
CRF
corticotropin-releasing factor
ER
Estrogen Receptor
FST
forced swim test
HPA axis
hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis
IFN
interferon
IL
interleukin
LC
locus coeruleus
LPS
lipopolysaccharide
MDD
major depressive disorder
NE
norepinephrine
PASAT
paced auditory serial addition task
PTSD
Post traumatic stress disorder
TSST
Trier social stress test
TNF
tumor necrosis factor
  • Copyright © 2020 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

References

  1. ↵
    1. Alesci S,
    2. Martinez PE,
    3. Kelkar S,
    4. Ilias I,
    5. Ronsaville DS,
    6. Listwak SJ,
    7. Ayala AR,
    8. Licinio J,
    9. Gold HK,
    10. Kling MA, et al.
    (2005) Major depression is associated with significant diurnal elevations in plasma interleukin-6 levels, a shift of its circadian rhythm, and loss of physiological complexity in its secretion: clinical implications. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:2522–2530.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Al-Harbi KS
    (2012) Treatment-resistant depression: therapeutic trends, challenges, and future directions. Patient Prefer Adherence 6:369–388.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Allen AP,
    2. Kennedy PJ,
    3. Dockray S,
    4. Cryan JF,
    5. Dinan TG, and
    6. Clarke G
    (2016) The trier social stress test: principles and practice. Neurobiol Stress 6:113–126.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Almeida DM
    (2005) Resilience and vulnerability to daily stressors assessed via diary methods. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 14:64–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Al-Rahbi B,
    2. Zakaria R,
    3. Muthuraju S,
    4. Othman Z, and
    5. Hassan A
    (2013) Preliminary study: effects of social instability stress on depressive behaviours in ovariectomised rats. The Malaysian journal of medical sciences 20 (2):35–40.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Aston-Jones G and
    2. Bloom FE
    (1981a) Activity of norepinephrine-containing locus coeruleus neurons in behaving rats anticipates fluctuations in the sleep-waking cycle. J Neurosci 1:876–886.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Aston-Jones G and
    2. Bloom FE
    (1981b) Norepinephrine-containing locus coeruleus neurons in behaving rats exhibit pronounced responses to non-noxious environmental stimuli. J Neurosci 1:887–900.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Baker AE,
    2. Brautigam VM, and
    3. Watters JJ
    (2004) Estrogen modulates microglial inflammatory mediator production via interactions with estrogen receptor beta. Endocrinology 145:5021–5032.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Bangasser DA and
    2. Valentino RJ
    (2012) Sex differences in molecular and cellular substrates of stress. Cell Mol Neurobiol 32:709–723.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Bangasser DA and
    2. Wiersielis KR
    (2018) Sex differences in stress responses: a critical role for corticotropin-releasing factor. Hormones (Athens) 17:5–13.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Bangasser DA,
    2. Wiersielis KR, and
    3. Khantsis S
    (2016) Sex differences in the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system and its regulation by stress. Brain Res 1641 (Pt B):177–188.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Bangasser DA,
    2. Zhang X,
    3. Garachh V,
    4. Hanhauser E, and
    5. Valentino RJ
    (2011) Sexual dimorphism in locus coeruleus dendritic morphology: a structural basis for sex differences in emotional arousal. Physiol Behav 103:342–351.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Barnard DF,
    2. Gabella KM,
    3. Kulp AC,
    4. Parker AD,
    5. Dugan PB, and
    6. Johnson JD
    (2019) Sex differences in the regulation of brain IL-1β in response to chronic stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology 103:203–211.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Batres RO and
    2. Dupont J
    (1986) Gender differences in prostacyclin and prostaglandin E2 synthesis by human endothelial cells. Prostaglandins Leukot Med 22:159–171.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Bekhbat M,
    2. Howell PA,
    3. Rowson SA,
    4. Kelly SD,
    5. Tansey MG, and
    6. Neigh GN
    (2019) Chronic adolescent stress sex-specifically alters central and peripheral neuro-immune reactivity in rats. Brain Behav Immun 76:248–257.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Bekhbat M and
    2. Neigh GN
    (2018) Sex differences in the neuro-immune consequences of stress: focus on depression and anxiety. Brain Behav Immun 67:1–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. Berman RM,
    2. Cappiello A,
    3. Anand A,
    4. Oren DA,
    5. Heninger GR,
    6. Charney DS, and
    7. Krystal JH
    (2000) Antidepressant effects of ketamine in depressed patients. Biol Psychiatry 47:351–354.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Blandino P Jr..,
    2. Hueston CM,
    3. Barnum CJ,
    4. Bishop C, and
    5. Deak T
    (2013) The impact of ventral noradrenergic bundle lesions on increased IL-1 in the PVN and hormonal responses to stress in male sprague dawley rats. Endocrinology 154:2489–2500.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Bollinger JL,
    2. Bergeon Burns CM, and
    3. Wellman CL
    (2016) Differential effects of stress on microglial cell activation in male and female medial prefrontal cortex. Brain Behav Immun 52:88–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Bollinger JL,
    2. Collins KE,
    3. Patel R, and
    4. Wellman CL
    (2017) Behavioral stress alters corticolimbic microglia in a sex- and brain region-specific manner. PLoS One 12:e0187631.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Bonaccorso S,
    2. Marino V,
    3. Biondi M,
    4. Grimaldi F,
    5. Ippoliti F, and
    6. Maes M
    (2002) Depression induced by treatment with interferon-alpha in patients affected by hepatitis C virus. J Affect Disord 72:237–241.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Borsody MK and
    2. Weiss JM
    (2002–2003) Alteration of locus coeruleus neuronal activity by interleukin-1 and the involvement of endogenous corticotropin-releasing hormone. Neuroimmunomodulation 10:101–121.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Borsody MK and
    2. Weiss JM
    (2004) The effects of endogenous interleukin-1 bioactivity on locus coeruleus neurons in response to bacterial and viral substances. Brain Res 1007:39–56.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Bower JE,
    2. Ganz PA,
    3. Aziz N, and
    4. Fahey JL
    (2002) Fatigue and proinflammatory cytokine activity in breast cancer survivors. Psychosom Med 64:604–611.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Bowman RE,
    2. Ferguson D, and
    3. Luine VN
    (2002) Effects of chronic restraint stress and estradiol on open field activity, spatial memory, and monoaminergic neurotransmitters in ovariectomized rats. Neuroscience 113 (2):401–410, doi: 10.106/S0306-4522(02)00156-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Brachman RA,
    2. McGowan JC,
    3. Perusini JN,
    4. Lim SC,
    5. Pham TH,
    6. Faye C,
    7. Gardier AM,
    8. Mendez-David I,
    9. David DJ,
    10. Hen R, et al.
    (2016) Ketamine as a prophylactic against stress-induced depressive-like behavior. Biol Psychiatry 79:776–786.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    1. Brady KT,
    2. McRae AL,
    3. Moran-Santa Maria MM,
    4. DeSantis SM,
    5. Simpson AN,
    6. Waldrop AE,
    7. Back SE, and
    8. Kreek MJ
    (2009) Response to corticotropin-releasing hormone infusion in cocaine-dependent individuals. Arch Gen Psychiatry 66:422–430.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Bucciarelli V,
    2. Caterino AL,
    3. Bianco F,
    4. Caputi CG,
    5. Salerni S,
    6. Sciomer S,
    7. Maffei S, and
    8. Gallina S
    (2019) Depression and cardiovascular disease: the deep blue sea of women’s heart. Trends Cardiovasc Med 30:170–176.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Capuron L,
    2. Ravaud A,
    3. Gualde N,
    4. Bosmans E,
    5. Dantzer R,
    6. Maes M, and
    7. Neveu PJ
    (2001) Association between immune activation and early depressive symptoms in cancer patients treated with interleukin-2-based therapy. Psychoneuroendocrinology 26:797–808.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Carrier N and
    2. Kabbaj M
    (2013) Sex differences in the antidepressant-like effects of ketamine. Neuropharmacology 70:27–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Cizza G,
    2. Eskandari F,
    3. Coyle M,
    4. Krishnamurthy P,
    5. Wright EC,
    6. Mistry S,
    7. Csako G, and P.O.W.E.R. (Premenopausal, Osteoporosis Women, Alendronate, Depression) Study Group
    (2009) Plasma CRP levels in premenopausal women with major depression: a 12-month controlled study. Horm Metab Res 41:641–648.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Clarke M,
    2. Razmjou S,
    3. Prowse N,
    4. Dwyer Z,
    5. Litteljohn D,
    6. Pentz R,
    7. Anisman H, and
    8. Hayley S
    (2017) Ketamine modulates hippocampal neurogenesis and pro-inflammatory cytokines but not stressor induced neurochemical changes. Neuropharmacology 112 (Pt A):210–220.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. Crain JM,
    2. Nikodemova M, and
    3. Watters JJ
    (2013) Microglia express distinct M1 and M2 phenotypic markers in the postnatal and adult central nervous system in male and female mice. J Neurosci Res 91:1143–1151.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Denicoff KD,
    2. Rubinow DR,
    3. Papa MZ,
    4. Simpson C,
    5. Seipp CA,
    6. Lotze MT,
    7. Chang AE,
    8. Rosenstein D, and
    9. Rosenberg SA
    (1987) The neuropsychiatric effects of treatment with interleukin-2 and lymphokine-activated killer cells. Ann Intern Med 107:293–300.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Dentino AN,
    2. Pieper CF,
    3. Rao MK,
    4. Currie MS,
    5. Harris T,
    6. Blazer DG, and
    7. Cohen HJ
    (1999) Association of interleukin-6 and other biologic variables with depression in older people living in the community. J Am Geriatr Soc 47:6–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Desroches M,
    2. Louis G,
    3. Gleizes A,
    4. Krzysiek R, and
    5. Emilie D
    (2010) Treatment failure with antagonists of TNF-α: mechanisms and implications for the care of patients. Eur Cytokine Netw 21:226–231.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Dudek KA,
    2. Dion-Albert L,
    3. Lebel M,
    4. LeClair K,
    5. Labrecque S,
    6. Tuck E,
    7. Ferrer Perez C,
    8. Golden SA,
    9. Tamminga C,
    10. Turecki G, et al.
    (2020) Molecular adaptations of the blood-brain barrier promote stress resilience vs. depression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117:3326–3336.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Edwards KM,
    2. Burns VE,
    3. Ring C, and
    4. Carroll D
    (2006) Sex differences in the interleukin-6 response to acute psychological stress. Biol Psychol 71:236–239.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Engler H,
    2. Benson S,
    3. Wegner A,
    4. Spreitzer I,
    5. Schedlowski M, and
    6. Elsenbruch S
    (2016) Men and women differ in inflammatory and neuroendocrine responses to endotoxin but not in the severity of sickness symptoms. Brain Behav Immun 52:18–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Erdman JW Jr..,
    2. Balentine D,
    3. Arab L,
    4. Beecher G,
    5. Dwyer JT,
    6. Folts J,
    7. Harnly J,
    8. Hollman P,
    9. Keen CL,
    10. Mazza G, et al.
    (2007) Flavonoids and heart health: proceedings of the ILSI North America Flavonoids Workshop, May 31-June 1, 2005, Washington, DC. J Nutr 137 (Suppl 1):718S–737S.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. Fagundes CP,
    2. Glaser R,
    3. Hwang BS,
    4. Malarkey WB, and
    5. Kiecolt-Glaser JK
    (2013) Depressive symptoms enhance stress-induced inflammatory responses. Brain Behav Immun 31:172–176.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Farzaei MH,
    2. Singh AK,
    3. Kumar R,
    4. Croley CR,
    5. Pandey AK,
    6. Coy-Barrera E,
    7. Kumar Patra J,
    8. Das G,
    9. Kerry RG,
    10. Annunziata G, et al.
    (2019) Targeting inflammation by flavonoids: novel therapeutic strategy for metabolic disorders. Int J Mol Sci 20:4957.
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. Finnell JE,
    2. Lombard CM,
    3. Melson MN,
    4. Singh NP,
    5. Nagarkatti M,
    6. Nagarkatti P,
    7. Fadel JR,
    8. Wood CS, and
    9. Wood SK
    (2017a) The protective effects of resveratrol on social stress-induced cytokine release and depressive-like behavior. Brain Behav Immun 59:147–157.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. ↵
    1. Finnell JE,
    2. Lombard CM,
    3. Padi AR,
    4. Moffitt CM,
    5. Wilson LB,
    6. Wood CS, and
    7. Wood SK
    (2017b) Physical versus psychological social stress in male rats reveals distinct cardiovascular, inflammatory and behavioral consequences. PLoS One 12:e0172868.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. ↵
    1. Finnell JE,
    2. Moffitt CM,
    3. Hesser LA,
    4. Harrington E,
    5. Melson MN,
    6. Wood CS, and
    7. Wood SK
    (2019) The contribution of the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system in the emergence of defeat-induced inflammatory priming. Brain Behav Immun 79:102–113.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Finnell JE,
    2. Muniz BL,
    3. Padi AR,
    4. Lombard CM,
    5. Moffitt CM,
    6. Wood CS,
    7. Wilson LB,
    8. Reagan LP,
    9. Wilson MA, and
    10. Wood SK
    (2018) Essential role of ovarian hormones in susceptibility to the consequences of witnessing social defeat in female rats. Biol Psychiatry 84:372–382.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. Finnell JE and
    2. Wood SK
    (2016) Neuroinflammation at the interface of depression and cardiovascular disease: evidence from rodent models of social stress. Neurobiol Stress 4:1–14.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. Finnell JE and
    2. Wood SK
    (2018) Putative inflammatory sensitive mechanisms underlying risk or resilience to social stress. Front Behav Neurosci 12:240.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. Fonken LK,
    2. Frank MG,
    3. Gaudet AD,
    4. D’Angelo HM,
    5. Daut RA,
    6. Hampson EC,
    7. Ayala MT,
    8. Watkins LR, and
    9. Maier SF
    (2018) Neuroinflammatory priming to stress is differentially regulated in male and female rats. Brain Behav Immun 70:257–267.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Fontana RJ,
    2. Schwartz SM,
    3. Gebremariam A,
    4. Lok AS, and
    5. Moyer CA
    (2002) Emotional distress during interferon-alpha-2B and ribavirin treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Psychosomatics 43:378–385.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Franceschelli A,
    2. Sens J,
    3. Herchick S,
    4. Thelen C, and
    5. Pitychoutis PM
    (2015) Sex differences in the rapid and the sustained antidepressant-like effects of ketamine in stress-naïve and “depressed” mice exposed to chronic mild stress. Neuroscience 290:49–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Frank MG,
    2. Fonken LK,
    3. Annis JL,
    4. Watkins LR, and
    5. Maier SF
    (2018) Stress disinhibits microglia via down-regulation of CD200R: a mechanism of neuroinflammatory priming. Brain Behav Immun 69:62–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  51. ↵
    1. Frank MG,
    2. Thompson BM,
    3. Watkins LR, and
    4. Maier SF
    (2012) Glucocorticoids mediate stress-induced priming of microglial pro-inflammatory responses. Brain Behav Immun 26:337–345.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Frank MG,
    2. Weber MD,
    3. Watkins LR, and
    4. Maier SF
    (2015) Stress-induced neuroinflammatory priming: a liability factor in the etiology of psychiatric disorders. Neurobiol Stress 4:62–70.
    OpenUrl
  53. ↵
    1. Fried EI,
    2. von Stockert S,
    3. Haslbeck JMB,
    4. Lamers F,
    5. Schoevers RA, and
    6. Penninx BWJH
    (2019) Using network analysis to examine links between individual depressive symptoms, inflammatory markers, and covariates. Psychol Med 1–9.
  54. ↵
    1. Gaab J,
    2. Rohleder N,
    3. Heitz V,
    4. Engert V,
    5. Schad T,
    6. Schürmeyer TH, and
    7. Ehlert U
    (2005) Stress-induced changes in LPS-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine production in chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychoneuroendocrinology 30:188–198.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Gallo JJ,
    2. Royall DR, and
    3. Anthony JC
    (1993) Risk factors for the onset of depression in middle age and later life. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 28:101–108.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Gao W,
    2. Wang W,
    3. Liu G,
    4. Zhang J,
    5. Yang J, and
    6. Deng Z
    (2019) Allicin attenuated chronic social defeat stress induced depressive-like behaviors through suppression of NLRP3 inflammasome. Metab Brain Dis 34:319–329.
    OpenUrl
  57. ↵
    1. Giletta M,
    2. Slavich GM,
    3. Rudolph KD,
    4. Hastings PD,
    5. Nock MK, and
    6. Prinstein MJ
    (2018) Peer victimization predicts heightened inflammatory reactivity to social stress in cognitively vulnerable adolescents. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 59:129–139.
    OpenUrl
  58. ↵
    1. Goel N,
    2. Workman JL,
    3. Lee TT,
    4. Innala L, and
    5. Viau V
    (2014) Sex differences in the HPA axis. Compr Physiol 4:1121–1155.
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    1. Gohier B,
    2. Goeb JL,
    3. Rannou-Dubas K,
    4. Fouchard I,
    5. Cales P, and
    6. Garre JB
    (2003) Hepatitis C, alpha interferon, anxiety and depression disorders: a prospective study of 71 patients. World J Biol Psychiatry 4:115–118.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Hanisch UK and
    2. Kettenmann H
    (2007) Microglia: active sensor and versatile effector cells in the normal and pathologic brain. Nat Neurosci 10:1387–1394.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Hankin BL,
    2. Abramson LY,
    3. Moffitt TE,
    4. Silva PA,
    5. McGee R, and
    6. Angell KE
    (1998) Development of depression from preadolescence to young adulthood: emerging gender differences in a 10-year longitudinal study. J Abnorm Psychol 107:128–140.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Hannestad J,
    2. DellaGioia N, and
    3. Bloch M
    (2011) The effect of antidepressant medication treatment on serum levels of inflammatory cytokines: a meta-analysis. Neuropsychopharmacology 36:2452–2459.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Hashioka S,
    2. Klegeris A,
    3. Monji A,
    4. Kato T,
    5. Sawada M,
    6. McGeer PL, and
    7. Kanba S
    (2007) Antidepressants inhibit interferon-gamma-induced microglial production of IL-6 and nitric oxide. Exp Neurol 206:33–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Ho PC,
    2. Triggs EJ,
    3. Bourne DW, and
    4. Heazlewood VJ
    (1985) The effects of age and sex on the disposition of acetylsalicylic acid and its metabolites. Br J Clin Pharmacol 19:675–684.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Hodes GE,
    2. Pfau ML,
    3. Leboeuf M,
    4. Golden SA,
    5. Christoffel DJ,
    6. Bregman D,
    7. Rebusi N,
    8. Heshmati M,
    9. Aleyasin H,
    10. Warren BL, et al.
    (2014) Individual differences in the peripheral immune system promote resilience versus susceptibility to social stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:16136–16141.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. ↵
    1. Hodes GE,
    2. Pfau ML,
    3. Purushothaman I,
    4. Ahn HF,
    5. Golden SA,
    6. Christoffel DJ,
    7. Magida J,
    8. Brancato A,
    9. Takahashi A,
    10. Flanigan ME, et al.
    (2015) Sex differences in nucleus accumbens transcriptome profiles associated with susceptibility versus resilience to subchronic variable stress. J Neurosci 35:16362–16376.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  67. ↵
    1. Holmes SE,
    2. Hinz R,
    3. Conen S,
    4. Gregory CJ,
    5. Matthews JC,
    6. Anton-Rodriguez JM,
    7. Gerhard A, and
    8. Talbot PS
    (2018) Elevated translocator protein in anterior cingulate in major depression and a role for inflammation in suicidal thinking: a positron emission tomography study. Biol Psychiatry 83:61–69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Iñiguez SD,
    2. Flores-Ramirez FJ,
    3. Riggs LM,
    4. Alipio JB,
    5. Garcia-Carachure I,
    6. Hernandez MA,
    7. Sanchez DO,
    8. Lobo MK,
    9. Serrano PA,
    10. Braren SH, et al.
    (2018) Vicarious social defeat stress induces depression-related outcomes in female mice. Biol Psychiatry 83:9–17.
    OpenUrl
  69. ↵
    1. Jiang H,
    2. Xie T,
    3. Ramsden DB, and
    4. Ho SL
    (2003) Human catechol-O-methyltransferase down-regulation by estradiol. Neuropharmacology 45:1011–1018.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. Johnson A,
    2. Rainville JR,
    3. Rivero-Ballon GN,
    4. Dhimitri K, and
    5. Hodes GE
    (2020) Testing the limits of sex differences using variable stress. Neuroscience S0306-4522:30889–9.
    OpenUrl
  71. ↵
    1. Jones ME,
    2. Lebonville CL,
    3. Paniccia JE,
    4. Balentine ME,
    5. Reissner KJ, and
    6. Lysle DT
    (2018) Hippocampal interleukin-1 mediates stress-enhanced fear learning: a potential role for astrocyte-derived interleukin-1β. Brain Behav Immun 67:355–363.
    OpenUrl
  72. ↵
    1. Kageyama K and
    2. Suda T
    (2009) Regulatory mechanisms underlying corticotropin-releasing factor gene expression in the hypothalamus. Endocr J 56:335–344.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Kao YC,
    2. Zhou C,
    3. Sherman M,
    4. Laughton CA, and
    5. Chen S
    (1998) Molecular basis of the inhibition of human aromatase (estrogen synthetase) by flavone and isoflavone phytoestrogens: a site-directed mutagenesis study. Environ Health Perspect 106:85–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Karisetty BC,
    2. Joshi PC,
    3. Kumar A, and
    4. Chakravarty S
    (2017) Sex differences in the effect of chronic mild stress on mouse prefrontal cortical BDNF levels: A role of major ovarian hormones. Neuroscience 356:89–101.
    OpenUrl
  74. ↵
    1. Kessler RC,
    2. McGonagle KA,
    3. Swartz M,
    4. Blazer DG, and
    5. Nelson CB
    (1993) Sex and depression in the National Comorbidity Survey. I: lifetime prevalence, chronicity and recurrence. J Affect Disord 29:85–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Kiraly DD,
    2. Horn SR,
    3. Van Dam NT,
    4. Costi S,
    5. Schwartz J,
    6. Kim-Schulze S,
    7. Patel M,
    8. Hodes GE,
    9. Russo SJ,
    10. Merad M, et al.
    (2017) Altered peripheral immune profiles in treatment-resistant depression: response to ketamine and prediction of treatment outcome. Transl Psychiatry 7:e1065.
    OpenUrl
  76. ↵
    1. Kirschbaum C,
    2. Pirke KM, and
    3. Hellhammer DH
    (1993) The ‘Trier Social Stress Test’--a tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology 28:76–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    1. Knapp DJ,
    2. Whitman BA,
    3. Wills TA,
    4. Angel RA,
    5. Overstreet DH,
    6. Criswell HE,
    7. Ming Z, and
    8. Breese GR
    (2011) Cytokine involvement in stress may depend on corticotrophin releasing factor to sensitize ethanol withdrawal anxiety. Brain Behav Immun 25 (Suppl 1):S146–S154.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Koo JW and
    2. Duman RS
    (2008) IL-1beta is an essential mediator of the antineurogenic and anhedonic effects of stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:751–756.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  79. ↵
    1. Kornstein SG,
    2. Schatzberg AF,
    3. Thase ME,
    4. Yonkers KA,
    5. McCullough JP,
    6. Keitner GI,
    7. Gelenberg AJ,
    8. Davis SM,
    9. Harrison WM, and
    10. Keller MB
    (2000) Gender differences in treatment response to sertraline versus imipramine in chronic depression. Am J Psychiatry 157:1445–1452.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Koskinas J,
    2. Merkouraki P,
    3. Manesis E, and
    4. Hadziyannis S
    (2002) Assessment of depression in patients with chronic hepatitis: effect of interferon treatment. Dig Dis 20:284–288.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. ↵
    1. Kraus MR,
    2. Schäfer A,
    3. Faller H,
    4. Csef H, and
    5. Scheurlen M
    (2003) Psychiatric symptoms in patients with chronic hepatitis C receiving interferon alfa-2b therapy. J Clin Psychiatry 64:708–714.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. ↵
    1. Krishnan V,
    2. Han MH,
    3. Graham DL,
    4. Berton O,
    5. Renthal W,
    6. Russo SJ,
    7. Laplant Q,
    8. Graham A,
    9. Lutter M,
    10. Lagace DC, et al.
    (2007) Molecular adaptations underlying susceptibility and resistance to social defeat in brain reward regions. Cell 131:391–404.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    1. Krishnan V and
    2. Nestler EJ
    (2008) The molecular neurobiology of depression. Nature 455:894–902.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  84. ↵
    1. Labaka A,
    2. Goñi-Balentziaga O,
    3. Lebeña A, and
    4. Pérez-Tejada J
    (2018) Biological sex differences in depression: a systematic review. Biol Res Nurs 20:383–392.
    OpenUrl
  85. ↵
    1. Lamers F,
    2. Vogelzangs N,
    3. Merikangas KR,
    4. de Jonge P,
    5. Beekman AT, and
    6. Penninx BW
    (2013) Evidence for a differential role of HPA-axis function, inflammation and metabolic syndrome in melancholic versus atypical depression. Mol Psychiatry 18:692–699.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. ↵
    1. Lanquillon S,
    2. Krieg JC,
    3. Bening-Abu-Shach U, and
    4. Vedder H
    (2000) Cytokine production and treatment response in major depressive disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 22:370–379.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. ↵
    1. LaPlant Q,
    2. Chakravarty S,
    3. Vialou V,
    4. Mukherjee S,
    5. Koo JW,
    6. Kalahasti G,
    7. Bradbury KR,
    8. Taylor SV,
    9. Maze I,
    10. Kumar A, et al.
    (2009) Role of nuclear factor kappaB in ovarian hormone-mediated stress hypersensitivity in female mice. Biol Psychiatry 65:874–880.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  88. ↵
    1. LeGates TA,
    2. Kvarta MD, and
    3. Thompson SM
    (2019) Sex differences in antidepressant efficacy. Neuropsychopharmacology 44:140–154.
    OpenUrl
  89. ↵
    1. Li LH,
    2. Wang ZC,
    3. Yu J, and
    4. Zhang YQ
    (2014) Ovariectomy results in variable changes in nociception, mood and depression in adult female rats. PLoS One 9:e94312.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. ↵
    1. Liu LL,
    2. Li JM,
    3. Su WJ,
    4. Wang B, and
    5. Jiang CL
    (2019) Sex differences in depressive-like behaviour may relate to imbalance of microglia activation in the hippocampus. Brain Behav Immun 81:188–197.
    OpenUrl
  91. ↵
    1. Loram LC,
    2. Sholar PW,
    3. Taylor FR,
    4. Wiesler JL,
    5. Babb JA,
    6. Strand KA,
    7. Berkelhammer D,
    8. Day HE,
    9. Maier SF, and
    10. Watkins LR
    (2012) Sex and estradiol influence glial pro-inflammatory responses to lipopolysaccharide in rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology 37:1688–1699.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  92. ↵
    1. Lubbers LS,
    2. Zafian PT,
    3. Gautreaux C,
    4. Gordon M,
    5. Alves SE,
    6. Correa L,
    7. Lorrain DS,
    8. Hickey GJ, and
    9. Luine V
    (2010) Estrogen receptor (ER) subtype agonists alter monoamine levels in the female rat brain. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 122:310–317.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  93. ↵
    1. Luque JM,
    2. de Blas MR,
    3. Segovia S, and
    4. Guillamón A
    (1992) Sexual dimorphism of the dopamine-beta-hydroxylase-immunoreactive neurons in the rat locus ceruleus. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 67:211–215.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  94. ↵
    1. Maes M,
    2. Bosmans E,
    3. De Jongh R,
    4. Kenis G,
    5. Vandoolaeghe E, and
    6. Neels H
    (1997) Increased serum IL-6 and IL-1 receptor antagonist concentrations in major depression and treatment resistant depression. Cytokine 9:853–858.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  95. ↵
    1. Maes M,
    2. Yirmyia R,
    3. Noraberg J,
    4. Brene S,
    5. Hibbeln J,
    6. Perini G,
    7. Kubera M,
    8. Bob P,
    9. Lerer B, and
    10. Maj M
    (2009) The inflammatory & neurodegenerative (I&ND) hypothesis of depression: leads for future research and new drug developments in depression. Metab Brain Dis 24:27–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  96. ↵
    1. Mahmoud R,
    2. Wainwright SR,
    3. Chaiton JA,
    4. Lieblich SE, and
    5. Galea LAM
    (2016) Ovarian hormones, but not fluoxetine, impart resilience within a chronic unpredictable stress model in middle-aged female rats. Neuropharmacology 107:278–293.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  97. ↵
    1. Mangge H,
    2. Almer G,
    3. Truschnig-Wilders M,
    4. Schmidt A,
    5. Gasser R, and
    6. Fuchs D
    (2010) Inflammation, adiponectin, obesity and cardiovascular risk. Curr Med Chem 17:4511–4520.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  98. ↵
    1. Marcus SM,
    2. Young EA,
    3. Kerber KB,
    4. Kornstein S,
    5. Farabaugh AH,
    6. Mitchell J,
    7. Wisniewski SR,
    8. Balasubramani GK,
    9. Trivedi MH, and
    10. Rush AJ
    (2005) Gender differences in depression: findings from the STAR*D study. J Affect Disord 87:141–150.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  99. ↵
    1. Mastrodonato A,
    2. Cohensedgh O,
    3. LaGamma CT,
    4. McGowan JC,
    5. Hunsberger HC, and
    6. Denny CA
    (2020) Prophylactic (R,S)-ketamine selectively protects against inflammatory stressors. Behav Brain Res 378:112238.
    OpenUrl
  100. ↵
    1. Mastrodonato A,
    2. Martinez R,
    3. Pavlova IP,
    4. LaGamma CT,
    5. Brachman RA,
    6. Robison AJ, and
    7. Denny CA
    (2018) Ventral CA3 activation mediates prophylactic ketamine efficacy against stress-induced depressive-like behavior. Biol Psychiatry 84:846–856.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  101. ↵
    1. Matalka KZ
    (2003) The effect of estradiol, but not progesterone, on the production of cytokines in stimulated whole blood, is concentration-dependent. Neuroendocrinol Lett 24:185–191.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  102. ↵
    1. McGowan JC,
    2. LaGamma CT,
    3. Lim SC,
    4. Tsitsiklis M,
    5. Neria Y,
    6. Brachman RA, and
    7. Denny CA
    (2017) Prophylactic ketamine attenuates learned fear. Neuropsychopharmacology 42:1577–1589.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  103. ↵
    1. Menard C,
    2. Pfau ML,
    3. Hodes GE,
    4. Kana V,
    5. Wang VX,
    6. Bouchard S,
    7. Takahashi A,
    8. Flanigan ME,
    9. Aleyasin H,
    10. LeClair KB, et al.
    (2017) Social stress induces neurovascular pathology promoting depression. Nat Neurosci 20:1752–1760.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  104. ↵
    1. Meyers CA,
    2. Albitar M, and
    3. Estey E
    (2005) Cognitive impairment, fatigue, and cytokine levels in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. Cancer 104:788–793.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  105. ↵
    1. Miczek KA
    (1979) A new test for aggression in rats without aversive stimulation: differential effects of d-amphetamine and cocaine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 60:253–259.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  106. ↵
    1. Miller AH,
    2. Maletic V, and
    3. Raison CL
    (2009) Inflammation and its discontents: the role of cytokines in the pathophysiology of major depression. Biol Psychiatry 65:732–741.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  107. ↵
    1. Miller AH and
    2. Raison CL
    (2016) The role of inflammation in depression: from evolutionary imperative to modern treatment target. Nat Rev Immunol 16:22–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  108. ↵
    1. Miller GE and
    2. Cole SW
    (2012) Clustering of depression and inflammation in adolescents previously exposed to childhood adversity. Biol Psychiatry 72:34–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  109. ↵
    1. Miller GE,
    2. Stetler CA,
    3. Carney RM,
    4. Freedland KE, and
    5. Banks WA
    (2002) Clinical depression and inflammatory risk markers for coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol 90:1279–1283.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  110. ↵
    1. Moieni M,
    2. Irwin MR,
    3. Jevtic I,
    4. Olmstead R,
    5. Breen EC, and
    6. Eisenberger NI
    (2015) Sex differences in depressive and socioemotional responses to an inflammatory challenge: implications for sex differences in depression. Neuropsychopharmacology 40:1709–1716.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  111. ↵
    1. Mor G,
    2. Nilsen J,
    3. Horvath T,
    4. Bechmann I,
    5. Brown S,
    6. Garcia-Segura LM, and
    7. Naftolin F
    (1999) Estrogen and microglia: a regulatory system that affects the brain. J Neurobiol 40:484–496.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  112. ↵
    1. Motivala SJ,
    2. Sarfatti A,
    3. Olmos L, and
    4. Irwin MR
    (2005) Inflammatory markers and sleep disturbance in major depression. Psychosom Med 67:187–194.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  113. ↵
    1. Murray CJ,
    2. Atkinson C,
    3. Bhalla K,
    4. Birbeck G,
    5. Burstein R,
    6. Chou D,
    7. Dellavalle R,
    8. Danaei G,
    9. Ezzati M,
    10. Fahimi A, et al., and U.S. Burden of Disease Collaborators
    (2013) The state of US health, 1990-2010: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. JAMA 310:591–608.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  114. ↵
    1. Musselman DL,
    2. Lawson DH,
    3. Gumnick JF,
    4. Manatunga AK,
    5. Penna S,
    6. Goodkin RS,
    7. Greiner K,
    8. Nemeroff CB, and
    9. Miller AH
    (2001a) Paroxetine for the prevention of depression induced by high-dose interferon alfa. N Engl J Med 344:961–966.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  115. ↵
    1. Musselman DL,
    2. Miller AH,
    3. Porter MR,
    4. Manatunga A,
    5. Gao F,
    6. Penna S,
    7. Pearce BD,
    8. Landry J,
    9. Glover S,
    10. McDaniel JS, et al.
    (2001b) Higher than normal plasma interleukin-6 concentrations in cancer patients with depression: preliminary findings. Am J Psychiatry 158:1252–1257.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  116. ↵
    1. Nagashima T,
    2. Okubo-Fornbacher H,
    3. Aoki Y,
    4. Kamata Y,
    5. Kimura H,
    6. Kamimura T,
    7. Nara H,
    8. Iwamoto M,
    9. Yoshio T,
    10. Okazaki H, et al.
    (2008) Increase in plasma levels of adiponectin after administration of anti-tumor necrosis factor agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 35:936–938.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  117. ↵
    1. Nelson LH,
    2. Warden S, and
    3. Lenz KM
    (2017) Sex differences in microglial phagocytosis in the neonatal hippocampus. Brain Behav Immun 64:11–22.
    OpenUrl
  118. ↵
    1. Newhouse PA,
    2. Dumas J,
    3. Wilkins H,
    4. Coderre E,
    5. Sites CK,
    6. Naylor M,
    7. Benkelfat C, and
    8. Young SN
    (2010) Estrogen treatment impairs cognitive performance after psychosocial stress and monoamine depletion in postmenopausal women. Menopause 17:860–873.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  119. ↵
    1. Nolen-Hoeksema S
    (2001) Gender differences in depression. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 10:173–176.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  120. ↵
    1. Owens MJ and
    2. Nemeroff CB
    (1991) Physiology and pharmacology of corticotropin-releasing factor. Pharmacol Rev 43:425–473.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  121. ↵
    1. Pace TW and
    2. Miller AH
    (2009) Cytokines and glucocorticoid receptor signaling. Relevance to major depression. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1179:86–105.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  122. ↵
    1. Pace TW,
    2. Mletzko TC,
    3. Alagbe O,
    4. Musselman DL,
    5. Nemeroff CB,
    6. Miller AH, and
    7. Heim CM
    (2006) Increased stress-induced inflammatory responses in male patients with major depression and increased early life stress. Am J Psychiatry 163:1630–1633.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  123. ↵
    1. Patki G,
    2. Solanki N, and
    3. Salim S
    (2014) Witnessing traumatic events causes severe behavioral impairments in rats. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 17:2017–2029.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  124. ↵
    1. Patten SB,
    2. Wang JL,
    3. Williams JV,
    4. Currie S,
    5. Beck CA,
    6. Maxwell CJ, and
    7. El-Guebaly N
    (2006) Descriptive epidemiology of major depression in Canada. Can J Psychiatry 51:84–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  125. ↵
    1. Prather AA,
    2. Carroll JE,
    3. Fury JM,
    4. McDade KK,
    5. Ross D, and
    6. Marsland AL
    (2009) Gender differences in stimulated cytokine production following acute psychological stress. Brain Behav Immun 23:622–628.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  126. ↵
    1. Rachman IM,
    2. Unnerstall JR,
    3. Pfaff DW, and
    4. Cohen RS
    (1998) Estrogen alters behavior and forebrain c-fos expression in ovariectomized rats subjected to the forced swim test. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:13941–13946.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  127. ↵
    1. Rahimian R,
    2. Cordeau P Jr.., and
    3. Kriz J
    (2019) Brain response to injuries: when microglia go sexist. Neuroscience 405:14–23.
    OpenUrl
  128. ↵
    1. Rai D,
    2. Zitko P,
    3. Jones K,
    4. Lynch J, and
    5. Araya R
    (2013) Country- and individual-level socioeconomic determinants of depression: multilevel cross-national comparison. Br J Psychiatry 202:195–203.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  129. ↵
    1. Rainville JR and
    2. Hodes GE
    (2019) Inflaming sex differences in mood disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology 44:184–199.
    OpenUrl
  130. ↵
    1. Raison CL,
    2. Demetrashvili M,
    3. Capuron L, and
    4. Miller AH
    (2005) Neuropsychiatric adverse effects of interferon-alpha: recognition and management. CNS Drugs 19:105–123.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  131. ↵
    1. Raison CL,
    2. Rutherford RE,
    3. Woolwine BJ,
    4. Shuo C,
    5. Schettler P,
    6. Drake DF,
    7. Haroon E, and
    8. Miller AH
    (2013) A randomized controlled trial of the tumor necrosis factor antagonist infliximab for treatment-resistant depression: the role of baseline inflammatory biomarkers. JAMA Psychiatry 70:31–41.
    OpenUrl
  132. ↵
    1. Ramirez K,
    2. Shea DT,
    3. McKim DB,
    4. Reader BF, and
    5. Sheridan JF
    (2015) Imipramine attenuates neuroinflammatory signaling and reverses stress-induced social avoidance. Brain Behav Immun 46:212–220.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ramos-Ortolaza DL,
    2. Doreste-Mendez RJ,
    3. Alvarado-Torres JK, and
    4. Torres-Reveron A
    (2017) Ovarian hormones modify anxiety behavior and glucocorticoid receptors after chronic social isolation stress. Behavioral brain research 328:115–122.
    OpenUrl
  133. ↵
    1. Ramsey JM,
    2. Cooper JD,
    3. Bot M,
    4. Guest PC,
    5. Lamers F,
    6. Weickert CS,
    7. Penninx BW, and
    8. Bahn S
    (2016) Sex differences in serum markers of major depressive disorder in the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA). PLoS One 11:e0156624.
    OpenUrl
  134. ↵
    1. Rathee P,
    2. Chaudhary H,
    3. Rathee S,
    4. Rathee D,
    5. Kumar V, and
    6. Kohli K
    (2009) Mechanism of action of flavonoids as anti-inflammatory agents: a review. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets 8:229–235.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  135. ↵
    1. Reddy MS
    (2010) Depression: the disorder and the burden. Indian J Psychol Med 32:1–2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  136. ↵
    1. Renault PF,
    2. Hoofnagle JH,
    3. Park Y,
    4. Mullen KD,
    5. Peters M,
    6. Jones DB,
    7. Rustgi V, and
    8. Jones EA
    (1987) Psychiatric complications of long-term interferon alfa therapy. Arch Intern Med 147:1577–1580.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  137. ↵
    1. Réus GZ,
    2. Nacif MP,
    3. Abelaira HM,
    4. Tomaz DB,
    5. dos Santos MA,
    6. Carlessi AS,
    7. da Luz JR,
    8. Gonçalves RC,
    9. Vuolo F,
    10. Dal-Pizzol F, et al.
    (2015) Ketamine ameliorates depressive-like behaviors and immune alterations in adult rats following maternal deprivation. Neurosci Lett 584:83–87.
    OpenUrl
  138. ↵
    1. Richards EM,
    2. Zanotti-Fregonara P,
    3. Fujita M,
    4. Newman L,
    5. Farmer C,
    6. Ballard ED,
    7. Machado-Vieira R,
    8. Yuan P,
    9. Niciu MJ,
    10. Lyoo CH, et al.
    (2018) PET radioligand binding to translocator protein (TSPO) is increased in unmedicated depressed subjects. EJNMMI Res 8:57.
    OpenUrl
  139. ↵
    1. Rohleder N,
    2. Schommer NC,
    3. Hellhammer DH,
    4. Engel R, and
    5. Kirschbaum C
    (2001) Sex differences in glucocorticoid sensitivity of proinflammatory cytokine production after psychosocial stress. Psychosom Med 63:966–972.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  140. ↵
    1. Rohleder N,
    2. Wolf JM,
    3. Piel M, and
    4. Kirschbaum C
    (2003) Impact of oral contraceptive use on glucocorticoid sensitivity of pro-inflammatory cytokine production after psychosocial stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology 28:261–273.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  141. ↵
    1. Schmeler KM,
    2. Vadhan-Raj S,
    3. Ramirez PT,
    4. Apte SM,
    5. Cohen L,
    6. Bassett RL,
    7. Iyer RB,
    8. Wolf JK,
    9. Levenback CL,
    10. Gershenson DM, et al.
    (2009) A phase II study of GM-CSF and rIFN-gamma1b plus carboplatin for the treatment of recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer. Gynecol Oncol 113:210–215.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  142. ↵
    1. Schwarz JM,
    2. Sholar PW, and
    3. Bilbo SD
    (2012) Sex differences in microglial colonization of the developing rat brain. J Neurochem 120:948–963.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  143. ↵
    1. Secondary Progressive Efficacy Clinical Trial of Recombinant Interferon-Beta-1a in MS (SPECTRIMS) Study Group
    (2001) Randomized controlled trial of interferon- beta-1a in secondary progressive MS: clinical results. Neurology 56:1496–1504.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  144. ↵
    1. Serafini M,
    2. Peluso I, and
    3. Raguzzini A
    (2010) Flavonoids as anti-inflammatory agents. Proc Nutr Soc 69:273–278.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  145. ↵
    1. Serova L,
    2. Rivkin M,
    3. Nakashima A, and
    4. Sabban EL
    (2002) Estradiol stimulates gene expression of norepinephrine biosynthetic enzymes in rat locus coeruleus. Neuroendocrinology 75:193–200.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  146. ↵
    1. Setiawan E,
    2. Wilson AA,
    3. Mizrahi R,
    4. Rusjan PM,
    5. Miler L,
    6. Rajkowska G,
    7. Suridjan I,
    8. Kennedy JL,
    9. Rekkas PV,
    10. Houle S, et al.
    (2015) Role of translocator protein density, a marker of neuroinflammation, in the brain during major depressive episodes. JAMA Psychiatry 72:268–275.
    OpenUrl
  147. ↵
    1. Shansky RM,
    2. Glavis-Bloom C,
    3. Lerman D,
    4. McRae P,
    5. Benson C,
    6. Miller K,
    7. Cosand L,
    8. Horvath TL, and
    9. Arnsten AF
    (2004) Estrogen mediates sex differences in stress-induced prefrontal cortex dysfunction. Mol Psychiatry 9:531–538.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  148. ↵
    1. Shen Z,
    2. Xu Y,
    3. Jiang X,
    4. Wang Z,
    5. Guo Y,
    6. Pan W, and
    7. Hou J
    (2019) Avicularin relieves depressive-like behaviors induced by chronic unpredictable mild stress in mice. Med Sci Monit 25:2777–2784.
    OpenUrl
  149. ↵
    1. Shughrue PJ,
    2. Lane MV, and
    3. Merchenthaler I
    (1997) Comparative distribution of estrogen receptor-alpha and -beta mRNA in the rat central nervous system. J Comp Neurol 388:507–525.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  150. ↵
    1. Slavich GM,
    2. Giletta M,
    3. Helms SW,
    4. Hastings PD,
    5. Rudolph KD,
    6. Nock MK, and
    7. Prinstein MJ
    (2020) Interpersonal life stress, inflammation, and depression in adolescence: Testing Social Signal Transduction Theory of Depression. Depress Anxiety 37:179–193.
    OpenUrl
  151. ↵
    1. Slavich GM and
    2. Irwin MR
    (2014) From stress to inflammation and major depressive disorder: a social signal transduction theory of depression. Psychol Bull 140:774–815.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  152. ↵
    1. Slavich GM and
    2. Sacher J
    (2019) Stress, sex hormones, inflammation, and major depressive disorder: Extending Social Signal Transduction Theory of Depression to account for sex differences in mood disorders. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 236:3063–3079.
    OpenUrl
  153. ↵
    1. Soares CN and
    2. Zitek B
    (2008) Reproductive hormone sensitivity and risk for depression across the female life cycle: a continuum of vulnerability? J Psychiatry Neurosci 33:331–343.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  154. ↵
    1. Stephens MA,
    2. Mahon PB,
    3. McCaul ME, and
    4. Wand GS
    (2016) Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis response to acute psychosocial stress: effects of biological sex and circulating sex hormones. Psychoneuroendocrinology 66:47–55.
    OpenUrl
  155. ↵
    1. Steptoe A,
    2. Hamer M, and
    3. Chida Y
    (2007) The effects of acute psychological stress on circulating inflammatory factors in humans: a review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav Immun 21:901–912.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  156. ↵
    1. Straub RH
    (2007) The complex role of estrogens in inflammation. Endocr Rev 28:521–574.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  157. ↵
    1. Sullivan S,
    2. Hammadah M,
    3. Wilmot K,
    4. Ramadan R,
    5. Pearce BD,
    6. Shah A,
    7. Kaseer B,
    8. Gafeer MM,
    9. Lima BB,
    10. Kim JH, et al.
    (2018) Young women with coronary artery disease exhibit higher concentrations of interleukin-6 at baseline and in response to mental stress. J Am Heart Assoc 7:e010329.
    OpenUrl
    1. Tang AC,
    2. Nakazawa M,
    3. Romeo RD,
    4. Reeb BC,
    5. Sisti H, and
    6. McEwen BS
    (2005) Effects of long-term estrogen replacement on social investigation and social memory in ovariectomized C57BL/6 mice. Hormones and behavior 47:350–357.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  158. ↵
    1. Tang J,
    2. Yu W,
    3. Chen S,
    4. Gao Z, and
    5. Xiao B
    (2018) Microglia polarization and endoplasmic reticulum stress in chronic social defeat stress induced depression mouse. Neurochem Res 43:985–994.
    OpenUrl
  159. ↵
    1. Todorović N and
    2. Filipović D
    (2017) The antidepressant- and anxiolytic-like effects of fluoxetine and clozapine in chronically isolated rats involve inhibition of hippocampal TNF-α. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 163:57–65.
    OpenUrl
  160. ↵
    1. Tsatsanis C,
    2. Androulidaki A,
    3. Dermitzaki E,
    4. Gravanis A, and
    5. Margioris AN
    (2007) Corticotropin releasing factor receptor 1 (CRF1) and CRF2 agonists exert an anti-inflammatory effect during the early phase of inflammation suppressing LPS-induced TNF-alpha release from macrophages via induction of COX-2 and PGE2. J Cell Physiol 210:774–783.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  161. ↵
    1. Tsyglakova M,
    2. McDaniel D, and
    3. Hodes GE
    (2019) Immune mechanisms of stress susceptibility and resilience: lessons from animal models. Front Neuroendocrinol 54:100771.
    OpenUrl
  162. ↵
    1. Tyring S,
    2. Gottlieb A,
    3. Papp K,
    4. Gordon K,
    5. Leonardi C,
    6. Wang A,
    7. Lalla D,
    8. Woolley M,
    9. Jahreis A,
    10. Zitnik R, et al.
    (2006) Etanercept and clinical outcomes, fatigue, and depression in psoriasis: double-blind placebo-controlled randomised phase III trial. Lancet 367:29–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  163. ↵
    1. Udina M,
    2. Castellví P,
    3. Moreno-España J,
    4. Navinés R,
    5. Valdés M,
    6. Forns X,
    7. Langohr K,
    8. Solà R,
    9. Vieta E, and
    10. Martín-Santos R
    (2012) Interferon-induced depression in chronic hepatitis C: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Psychiatry 73:1128–1138.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  164. ↵
    1. Wang W,
    2. Ji P, and
    3. Dow KE
    (2003) Corticotropin-releasing hormone induces proliferation and TNF-alpha release in cultured rat microglia via MAP kinase signalling pathways. J Neurochem 84:189–195.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  165. ↵
    1. Wang YL,
    2. Han QQ,
    3. Gong WQ,
    4. Pan DH,
    5. Wang LZ,
    6. Hu W,
    7. Yang M,
    8. Li B,
    9. Yu J, and
    10. Liu Q
    (2018) Microglial activation mediates chronic mild stress-induced depressive- and anxiety-like behavior in adult rats. J Neuroinflammation 15:21.
    OpenUrl
  166. ↵
    1. Weinberger AH,
    2. Gbedemah M,
    3. Martinez AM,
    4. Nash D,
    5. Galea S, and
    6. Goodwin RD
    (2018) Trends in depression prevalence in the USA from 2005 to 2015: widening disparities in vulnerable groups. Psychol Med 48:1308–1315.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  167. ↵
    1. Weissman MM,
    2. Bland R,
    3. Joyce PR,
    4. Newman S,
    5. Wells JE, and
    6. Wittchen HU
    (1993) Sex differences in rates of depression: cross-national perspectives. J Affect Disord 29:77–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  168. ↵
    1. Weissman MM and
    2. Klerman GL
    (1992) Depression: current understanding and changing trends. Annu Rev Public Health 13:319–339.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  169. ↵
    1. Wohleb ES,
    2. Fenn AM,
    3. Pacenta AM,
    4. Powell ND,
    5. Sheridan JF, and
    6. Godbout JP
    (2012) Peripheral innate immune challenge exaggerated microglia activation, increased the number of inflammatory CNS macrophages, and prolonged social withdrawal in socially defeated mice. Psychoneuroendocrinology 37:1491–1505.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  170. ↵
    1. Wohleb ES,
    2. Terwilliger R,
    3. Duman CH, and
    4. Duman RS
    (2018) Stress-induced neuronal colony stimulating factor 1 provokes microglia-mediated neuronal remodeling and depressive-like behavior. Biol Psychiatry 83:38–49.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Wood GE and
    2. Shors TJ
    (1998) Stress facilitates classical conditioning in males, but impairs classical conditioning in females through activational effects of ovarian hormones. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95:4066–4071.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  171. ↵
    1. Wood SK,
    2. Walker HE,
    3. Valentino RJ, and
    4. Bhatnagar S
    (2010) Individual differences in reactivity to social stress predict susceptibility and resilience to a depressive phenotype: role of corticotropin-releasing factor. Endocrinology 151:1795–1805.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  172. ↵
    1. Wood SK,
    2. Wood CS,
    3. Lombard CM,
    4. Lee CS,
    5. Zhang XY,
    6. Finnell JE, and
    7. Valentino RJ
    (2015) Inflammatory factors mediate vulnerability to a social stress-induced depressive-like phenotype in passive coping rats. Biol Psychiatry 78:38–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  173. ↵
    1. Yin W,
    2. Gallagher NR,
    3. Sawicki CM,
    4. McKim DB,
    5. Godbout JP, and
    6. Sheridan JF
    (2019) Repeated social defeat in female mice induces anxiety-like behavior associated with enhanced myelopoiesis and increased monocyte accumulation in the brain. Brain Behav Immun 78:131–142.
    OpenUrl
  174. ↵
    1. Zheng M,
    2. Fan Y,
    3. Shi D, and
    4. Liu C
    (2013) Antidepressant-like effect of flavonoids extracted from Apocynum venetum leaves on brain monoamine levels and dopaminergic system. J Ethnopharmacol 147:108–113.
    OpenUrl
  175. ↵
    1. Zorrilla EP,
    2. Luborsky L,
    3. McKay JR,
    4. Rosenthal R,
    5. Houldin A,
    6. Tax A,
    7. McCorkle R,
    8. Seligman DA, and
    9. Schmidt K
    (2001) The relationship of depression and stressors to immunological assays: a meta-analytic review. Brain Behav Immun 15:199–226.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics: 375 (1)
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Vol. 375, Issue 1
1 Oct 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sex Differences in the Inflammatory Consequences of Stress: Implications for Pharmacotherapy
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleSpecial Section on Sexual Dimorphism in Neuroimmune Cells

Sex Differences in Stress-Induced Inflammation

Gustavo A. Martinez-Muniz and Susan K. Wood
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics October 1, 2020, 375 (1) 161-174; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.120.266205

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Research ArticleSpecial Section on Sexual Dimorphism in Neuroimmune Cells

Sex Differences in Stress-Induced Inflammation

Gustavo A. Martinez-Muniz and Susan K. Wood
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics October 1, 2020, 375 (1) 161-174; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.120.266205
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Recruitment of the Innate Immune Response after Psychological Stress
    • Link between Inflammation and Depression
    • Impact of Ovarian Hormones on Behavioral and Immune Responses to Stress
    • Impact of Antidepressant Therapy on Inflammation
    • Conclusions
    • Authorship Contributions
    • Footnotes
    • Abbreviations
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Microglia and Other Myeloid Cells in CNS Health and Disease
  • α-2 Adrenergic Receptors and Cocaine Choice in Monkeys
Show more Special Section on Sexual Dimorphism in Neuroimmune Cells

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About JPET
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-0103 (Online)

Copyright © 2023 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics