Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Visit jpet on Facebook
  • Follow jpet on Twitter
  • Follow jpet on LinkedIn
Research ArticleDrug Discovery and Translational Medicine
Open Access

(3S)‐3‐(2,3‐difluorophenyl)‐3‐methoxypyrrolidine (IRL752) —a Novel Cortical-Preferring Catecholamine Transmission- and Cognition-Promoting Agent

S. Hjorth, S. Waters, N. Waters, J. Tedroff, P. Svensson, A. Fagerberg, M. Edling, B. Svanberg, E. Ljung, J. Gunnergren, S.L. McLean, B. Grayson, N.F. Idris, J.C. Neill and C. Sonesson
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics September 2020, 374 (3) 404-419; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.120.000037
S. Hjorth
Integrative Research Laboratories Sweden AB (IRL AB), Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H., S.W., N.W., J.T., P.S., A.F., M.E., B.S., E.L., J.G., C.S.); Pharmacilitator AB, Vallda, Sweden (S.H.); Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H.); School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom (S.L.M.); and Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (B.G., N.F.I., J.C.N.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Waters
Integrative Research Laboratories Sweden AB (IRL AB), Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H., S.W., N.W., J.T., P.S., A.F., M.E., B.S., E.L., J.G., C.S.); Pharmacilitator AB, Vallda, Sweden (S.H.); Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H.); School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom (S.L.M.); and Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (B.G., N.F.I., J.C.N.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S. Waters
N. Waters
Integrative Research Laboratories Sweden AB (IRL AB), Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H., S.W., N.W., J.T., P.S., A.F., M.E., B.S., E.L., J.G., C.S.); Pharmacilitator AB, Vallda, Sweden (S.H.); Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H.); School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom (S.L.M.); and Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (B.G., N.F.I., J.C.N.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Tedroff
Integrative Research Laboratories Sweden AB (IRL AB), Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H., S.W., N.W., J.T., P.S., A.F., M.E., B.S., E.L., J.G., C.S.); Pharmacilitator AB, Vallda, Sweden (S.H.); Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H.); School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom (S.L.M.); and Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (B.G., N.F.I., J.C.N.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Svensson
Integrative Research Laboratories Sweden AB (IRL AB), Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H., S.W., N.W., J.T., P.S., A.F., M.E., B.S., E.L., J.G., C.S.); Pharmacilitator AB, Vallda, Sweden (S.H.); Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H.); School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom (S.L.M.); and Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (B.G., N.F.I., J.C.N.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Fagerberg
Integrative Research Laboratories Sweden AB (IRL AB), Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H., S.W., N.W., J.T., P.S., A.F., M.E., B.S., E.L., J.G., C.S.); Pharmacilitator AB, Vallda, Sweden (S.H.); Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H.); School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom (S.L.M.); and Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (B.G., N.F.I., J.C.N.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Edling
Integrative Research Laboratories Sweden AB (IRL AB), Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H., S.W., N.W., J.T., P.S., A.F., M.E., B.S., E.L., J.G., C.S.); Pharmacilitator AB, Vallda, Sweden (S.H.); Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H.); School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom (S.L.M.); and Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (B.G., N.F.I., J.C.N.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Svanberg
Integrative Research Laboratories Sweden AB (IRL AB), Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H., S.W., N.W., J.T., P.S., A.F., M.E., B.S., E.L., J.G., C.S.); Pharmacilitator AB, Vallda, Sweden (S.H.); Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H.); School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom (S.L.M.); and Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (B.G., N.F.I., J.C.N.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Ljung
Integrative Research Laboratories Sweden AB (IRL AB), Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H., S.W., N.W., J.T., P.S., A.F., M.E., B.S., E.L., J.G., C.S.); Pharmacilitator AB, Vallda, Sweden (S.H.); Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H.); School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom (S.L.M.); and Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (B.G., N.F.I., J.C.N.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Gunnergren
Integrative Research Laboratories Sweden AB (IRL AB), Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H., S.W., N.W., J.T., P.S., A.F., M.E., B.S., E.L., J.G., C.S.); Pharmacilitator AB, Vallda, Sweden (S.H.); Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H.); School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom (S.L.M.); and Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (B.G., N.F.I., J.C.N.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.L. McLean
Integrative Research Laboratories Sweden AB (IRL AB), Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H., S.W., N.W., J.T., P.S., A.F., M.E., B.S., E.L., J.G., C.S.); Pharmacilitator AB, Vallda, Sweden (S.H.); Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H.); School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom (S.L.M.); and Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (B.G., N.F.I., J.C.N.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Grayson
Integrative Research Laboratories Sweden AB (IRL AB), Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H., S.W., N.W., J.T., P.S., A.F., M.E., B.S., E.L., J.G., C.S.); Pharmacilitator AB, Vallda, Sweden (S.H.); Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H.); School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom (S.L.M.); and Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (B.G., N.F.I., J.C.N.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N.F. Idris
Integrative Research Laboratories Sweden AB (IRL AB), Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H., S.W., N.W., J.T., P.S., A.F., M.E., B.S., E.L., J.G., C.S.); Pharmacilitator AB, Vallda, Sweden (S.H.); Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H.); School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom (S.L.M.); and Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (B.G., N.F.I., J.C.N.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.C. Neill
Integrative Research Laboratories Sweden AB (IRL AB), Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H., S.W., N.W., J.T., P.S., A.F., M.E., B.S., E.L., J.G., C.S.); Pharmacilitator AB, Vallda, Sweden (S.H.); Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H.); School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom (S.L.M.); and Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (B.G., N.F.I., J.C.N.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Sonesson
Integrative Research Laboratories Sweden AB (IRL AB), Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H., S.W., N.W., J.T., P.S., A.F., M.E., B.S., E.L., J.G., C.S.); Pharmacilitator AB, Vallda, Sweden (S.H.); Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden (S.H.); School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom (S.L.M.); and Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (B.G., N.F.I., J.C.N.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • Correction to “(3S)-3-(2,3-difluorophenyl)-3-methoxypyrrolidine (IRL752) – a Novel Cortical-Preferring Catecholamine Transmission – and Cognition-Promoting Agent” - September 01, 2020

Visual Overview

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

Here we describe for the first time the distinctive pharmacological profile for (3S)‐3‐(2,3‐difluorophenyl)‐3‐methoxypyrrolidine (IRL752), a new phenyl-pyrrolidine derivative with regioselective central nervous system transmission-enhancing properties. IRL752 (3.7–150 µmol/kg, s.c.) was characterized through extensive in vivo studies using behavioral, tissue neurochemical, and gene expression as well as microdialysis methods. Behaviorally, the compound normalized tetrabenazine-induced hypoactivity, whereas it was unable to stimulate basal locomotion in normal animals or either accentuate or reverse hyperactivity induced by amphetamine or MK-801. IRL752 induced but minor changes in monoaminergic tissue neurochemistry across noradrenaline (NA)- and dopamine (DA)-dominated brain regions. The expression of neuronal activity–, plasticity-, and cognition-related immediate early genes (IEGs), however, increased by 1.5-fold to 2-fold. Furthermore, IRL752 dose-dependently enhanced cortical catecholamine dialysate output to 600%–750% above baseline, whereas striatal DA remained unaltered, and NA rose to ∼250%; cortical and hippocampal dialysate acetylcholine (ACh) increased to ∼250% and 190% above corresponding baseline, respectively. In line with this cortically preferential transmission-promoting action, the drug was also procognitive in the novel object recognition and reversal learning tests. In vitro neurotarget affinity and functional data coupled to drug exposure support the hypothesis that 5-hydroxytryptamine 7 receptor and α2(C)-adrenoceptor antagonism are key contributors to the in vivo efficacy and original profile of IRL752. The cortical-preferring facilitatory impact on catecholamine (and ACh) neurotransmission, along with effects on IEG expression and cognition-enhancing features, are in line with the potential clinical usefulness of IRL752 in conditions wherein these aspects may be dysregulated, such as in axial motor and cognitive deficits in Parkinson disease.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This report describes the distinctive preclinical profile of (3S)‐3‐(2,3‐difluorophenyl)‐3‐methoxypyrrolidine (IRL752). Its in vivo neurochemical, behavioral, microdialysis, and gene expression properties are consistent with a cortically regioselective facilitatory impact on catecholaminergic and cholinergic neurotransmission accompanied by cognitive impairment–reversing features. The pharmacological characteristics of IRL752 are in line with the clinical usefulness of IRL752 in conditions wherein these aspects may be dysregulated, such as in axial motor and cognitive deficits in Parkinson disease.

Introduction

Traditionally, Parkinson disease (PD) is primarily associated with its well-known motor manifestations, such as slowness and poverty of movements, resting tremor, muscular rigidity, and postural dysfunction. It is however becoming increasingly recognized that several nonmotor symptoms are also prominently represented in PD, some of which may also temporally precede the motor impairments (Chaudhuri et al., 2015; Sauerbier et al., 2016). Among the nonmotor symptoms in PD, cognitive deficits are highly prevalent (e.g., Willis et al., 2012). Cognitive symptoms may present early (Aarsland et al., 2009), with their prevalence rising dramatically over the course of the disease. Cognitive impairment is also a strong and independent predictor of mortality in patients with PD (Grimbergen et al., 2009; Willis et al., 2012; de Lau et al., 2014), and among those that do survive more than 20 years, dementia is present in >80% of cases (Hely et al., 2008). The number of elderly people with PD is likely to grow as global life expectancy increases. As drug treatments for cognitive impairment associated with neurodegenerative disorders, such as PD, are nonexistent (apart from the modestly effective Alzheimer dementia agents), improvements in this area would represent a significant advance to address this key unmet medical need in PD care (see Seppi et al., 2011; Szeto and Lewis, 2016). It is clear that the lack of efficacious treatments for cognitive dysfunction in PD has deleterious effects on the patients’ quality of life, burdens the caregivers, and causes substantial health costs to society (Vossius et al., 2011; Leroi et al., 2012; Kowal et al., 2013).

The exact underlying biologic substrates for cognitive impairment and dementia in PD have yet to be pinpointed. Deficits in cortical catecholaminergic and cholinergic transmission as well as in the signaling in cortico-striatal neurocircuitries have, however, been implicated (Beeler et al., 2013; Shepherd, 2013; Schirinzi et al., 2016). Subcortical Lewy body– and Alzheimer disease–related neuropathology has also been reported to be associated with cognitive decline in PD (see Weintraub and Burn, 2011, and references cited within). Interestingly, axial motor symptoms relating to postural instability (balance) and falls are strongly related to cognitive deficits in PD (Pantall et al., 2018). Both of these symptom clusters respond poorly to current anti-Parkinson treatment (Hely et al., 2008). It is probable that cognitive deficits in different PD subjects have heterogeneous pathologic and neurochemical substrates (e.g., Goldman and Holden, 2014). This notwithstanding, it may be assumed that, broadly, novel treatments aiming at strengthening cortico-striatal connectivity through enhanced monoaminergic and cholinergic network function could become beneficial in this context. One of the aims of our ongoing Research and Development projects has therefore been to develop a molecule that would meet the aforementioned profile.

(3S)‐3‐(2,3‐difluorophenyl)‐3‐methoxypyrrolidine (IRL752; Fig. 1) is a novel compound discovered and developed in an in vivo systems pharmacology (see Waters et al., 2017) program aiming to generate novel agents with a preferential enhancing effect on cortical versus subcortical catecholamine [dopamine (DA) and noradrenaline (NA)] output. The current report describes the actions of this agent on regional neuronal transmission in vivo, behavior, cognition, and synaptic activity–related gene expression in the rat. Overall, the data are consistent with the characterization of IRL752 as a cortical-preferring catecholamine- and cognition-promoting agent. Its profile is suggestive of potential usefulness for symptoms and signs in PD associated with deficits of cortical function, such as cognitive impairment and postural/axial motor dysfunction.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Chemical structure and radar diagram illustrating the target binding profile of IRL752. Shown is the chemical structure (inset) and target binding profile of IRL752, with Ki data plotted (filled circles) in a radar-type diagram with an excentric scale from 0 to 30 µM. Dotted, color-shaded area depicts estimated [IRL752]brain, free levels 60’ after administration of doses between 11 and 50 µmol/kg s.c. (see Results)—corresponding to the Ki concentration-range up to 6 µM, within which, i.a. the 5-HT7, σ1 receptor (Sig-1R), and α2C-adrenoceptor affinities are found: the closer to center, the higher affinity (see further, Table 1). KOR, κ opioid receptor; MOR, μ opioid receptor.

Materials and Methods

Animals.

Behavioral, in/ex vivo neurochemistry, gene expression, and in vivo microdialysis studies were carried out in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (Taconic; weight 290–320 g at the time of use in microdialysis and 220–250 g in neurochemistry and gene expression studies). Upon arrival from the supplier, the animals were housed two to four per cage under standard controlled laboratory conditions (temperature 20–22°C; humidity 40%–70%; lights on/off 0700/1900 hours; 20–25 air exchanges/h) with food (standard rat chow; R36 Lactamin or similar: protein 20%–25%, carbohydrates 40%–50%, fat 3%–5%) and tap water allowed ad libitum until the animals were used in the experiments. The cages were equipped with enrichment materials, such as wooden sticks, plastic tunnels, etc.

Cognition studies were carried in a total of two cohorts of 60 female Lister Hooded rats (Harlan, UK, for the Bradford study and Charles River, UK, for the Manchester study): 60 for novel object recognition (NOR) and 60 for the reversal learning (RL) study; weights were 220–260 g and 275–300 g, respectively, at the time of testing. The NOR study was performed at the University of Bradford, and the RL study was performed at the University of Manchester. All animals were housed in groups of 5 under standard laboratory conditions under a 12-hour light:dark cycle (lights on at 0700 hours). At Manchester, rats were housed in individually ventilated, two-tiered plastic cages (38 × 59 × 24 cm, GR1800 Double-Decker Cage; Tecniplast, UK). These cages contained paper sizzle nest, sawdust, and cardboard tunnels (Datesand Group, UK). In Bradford, rats were housed in standard, nonventilated, single-tiered caging, as described in Sutcliffe et al. (2007). The NOR cohort were allowed free access to food, whereas the RL cohort, prior to operant training and testing, was gradually food-deprived to approximately 90% of free-feeding body weight; reduced body weight was maintained by restricting the amount of food given to each rat per day (approx. 12 g/day). Testing was carried out in the light phase. Female rats were used for these studies because it has been shown that female rats show a greater response to NMDA receptor antagonists than males (Moy and Breese, 2002), an effect we can confirm (B.G., personal communication). Furthermore, we have shown that female rats perform better in certain cognitive tasks than males (Sutcliffe et al., 2007).

All studies were carried out in compliance with European Union Directives and Guidelines for the care and use of animals in experiments and were approved by the local Animal Ethics Committee (microdialysis: 182/10 and 23/14; behavior/neurochemistry/gene expression: 279/10, 140/11, and 91/14) on behalf of the Swedish Department of Agriculture. The cognition studies were conducted in accordance with the Animals Scientific Procedures Act (UK, 1986) and approved by each University’s Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Board. All efforts were made to keep the number of animals used to the minimum acceptable for robust statistical assessment of treatment outcomes.

Drugs.

IRL752 [(3S)‐3‐(2,3‐difluorophenyl)‐3‐methoxypyrrolidine × HCl] was synthesized in-house and dissolved in physiologic saline (0.9% w/v NaCl). The drug was injected subcutaneously in a volume of 5 ml/kg, either 4–5 minutes before start of locomotor activity recordings (i.e., 64–65 minutes before termination of the animals and subsequent sampling for neurochemical and gene expression analysis) or immediately before start of microdialysis sampling. For interaction studies, rats were pretreated with MK-801 (maleate, 0.2 or 0.7 mg/kg; Sigma-Aldrich, UK) or d-amphetamine (sulfate, 1.5 mg/kg; AKL, Sweden) dissolved in 0.9% NaCl and given intraperitoneally 90 or 10 minutes, respectively, before start of locomotor recordings (i.e., 150 or 70 minutes, respectively, before termination of the animals and subsequent sampling for neurochemical and gene expression analysis). Tetrabenazine (0.64 mg/kg, s.c.; Sigma-Aldrich) was given in 0.9% NaCl (5 ml/kg) together with IRL752 at 5 minutes before start of locomotor activity recordings (i.e., 65 minutes before termination of the animals and subsequent sampling for neurochemical and gene expression analysis).

For the cognition model studies, rats were pretreated with either 2.0 mg/kg phencyclidine (PCP) (Sigma) dissolved in 0.9% NaCl or vehicle (0.9% NaCl), our standard subchronic PCP (scPCP) dosing regimen shown to produce robust and stable cognitive deficits (for reviews see Neill et al., 2010; Cadinu et al., 2018). PCP was administered intraperitoneally twice daily for 7 days, and this was followed by a 7-day drug washout period (see Fig. 4 for the study design). IRL752 was dissolved in 0.9% NaCl and administered in a volume of 5 ml/kg, s.c., 30 or 45 minutes prior to testing. Risperidone (0.1 mg/ml; Sigma) was dissolved in a minimum volume of acetic acid, made up to volume with distilled water pH-adjusted to 6 with 0.1 M NaOH, and administered intraperitoneally in a volume of 1 ml/kg 60 minutes prior to testing. SKF38393 (Sigma) was dissolved in 0.9% NaCl and administered intraperitoneally in a volume of 1 ml/kg 60 minutes prior to testing. In all experiments, the appropriate vehicle treatment was used. All drug doses were calculated as base equivalent weight.

Doses of IRL752 were selected based on in-house data. The dose range of IRL752 in the RL test was reduced (4.7–47 µmol/kg) compared with the NOR test (15.6–140 µmol/kg) because IRL752 at the highest dose tested (140 µmol/kg) was found to significantly reduce responding such that only two rats completed the task (see Results below and Supplemental Material). Risperidone (0.1 mg/kg) and SKF38393 (6 mg/kg) were selected as positive controls at the doses tested in this study based on their efficacy to improve scPCP-induced cognitive deficits in previous studies in our laboratory (Grayson et al., 2007; McLean et al., 2009). These drugs would also be expected to represent indirect and direct, respectively, means of enhancing D1 receptor–mediated neurotransmission, as they are examples of agents with D2 (auto)receptor blocking and direct D1 receptor–stimulating properties.

In Vitro Target Binding and Functional Studies.

The in vitro binding and functional characterization of IRL752 were performed by CEREP (Celle l’Evescault, France; contracted by IRL AB for these studies) across a panel of 65 selected targets using standardized binding and/or functional assays (see https://www.eurofinsdiscoveryservices.com/cms/cms-content/services/in-vitro-assays/). Inhibition constants (Ki) were calculated using the Cheng-Prusoff equation [Ki = IC50/(1 + (L/Kd)), in which L = concentration of radioligand in the assay, and Kd = the equilibrium dissociation constant; affinity of the radioligand for the receptor]. A Scatchard plot was used to determine the Kd.

In/Ex Vivo Brain Monoaminergic Neurochemistry.

Post-mortem concentrations of several monoaminergic indices (DA, NA, 5-HT, DOPA, HVA, 3-MT, 5-HIAA) were determined in striatal, limbic, and cortical tissue; collected; and dissected 64 minutes after administration of IRL752 (3.7–100 µmol/kg, s.c.) to normal rats, immediately after a 60-minute motor activity recording session (see below). Tissue sample preparation and neurochemical content analysis of monoamines and their metabolites (standard high-performance liquid chromatography with electrical detection) were carried out as described elsewhere (Waters et al., 2017).

Behavior: In Habituated and Nonhabituated, Nonpretreated Rats and in Monoamine-Depleted, Hyperdopaminergic, or Hypoglutamatergic States.

The behavior of rats was recorded in sound- and light-attenuating motor activity–monitoring chambers equipped with infrared movement detectors (two rows, each consisting of 16 sensors placed 2.5 cm apart and placed in a 90° angle along the front and side of the floor of the cage; Digiscan Activity Monitor RZYCCM-16 TAO; Omnitech Electronics), thus allowing for high-resolution assessment of motor patterns across a 40 × 40 cm–sized arena using several different sampling frequencies (0.25–25 Hz) in parallel (for further details, see Waters et al., 2017). Only data from the 25-Hz sampling channel (distance traveled) are shown in the Results.

Motor activity recordings started 4 minutes after injection of IRL752 (3.7–100 µmol/kg, s.c.) and covered 0–60 minutes thereafter. Motor activity studies were carried out in a variety of conditions, including during drug effects on the spontaneous nonhabituated locomotion/exploration as well as after habituation to the novel environment. In addition, the effect of different doses of IRL752 was assessed in acutely monoamine-depleted, hyperdopaminergic, and hypoglutamatergic behavioral states, as induced by the vesicular monoamine transport inhibitor tetrabenazine (0.64 mg/kg, s.c., 4 minutes before recording), the DA-releasing agent d-amphetamine (1.5 mg/kg, i.p., 10 minutes before recording), or the glutamate NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 (dizocilpine; 0.2 or 0.7 mg/kg, i.p., 90 minutes before recording), respectively.

Cognitive Behavioral Tests: NOR and RL.

The NOR test was performed as previously described in detail elsewhere (Grayson et al., 2007; Snigdha et al., 2010). Briefly, rats (N = 60; 50 subchronically treated with the NMDA receptor antagonist PCP and 10 treated with vehicle) were habituated in cage groups to an empty test box for 1 hour on day 1. After an additional 3-minute habituation period on day 2, rats were given two 3-minute trials separated by a 1-minute intertrial interval in the home cage. In the first (acquisition) trial, animals were placed in the test box and allowed to explore two identical objects (A1 and A2). In the second (retention) trial, animals were placed in the test box with one duplicate familiar object from the acquisition phase (to avoid olfactory trails) and one novel object. On the day of testing, rats were randomly assigned to six treatment groups (n = 9 to 10 per group) to receive an acute treatment with IRL752 (15.6, 47, and 140 µmol/kg, s.c., 30 minutes prior to testing), risperidone (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.), or vehicle. Behavior was filmed and scored by a trained experimenter who was blinded to the treatment groups. Total object exploration time (defined as the duration of time animals spent licking, sniffing, or touching the object but not including time spent standing or sitting on or leaning against the object) was recorded for each of the familiar and novel objects in the acquisition and retention trials; locomotor activity (defined as movement, measured by the number of lines crossed in both trials) was also monitored. Any animal that failed to explore one or both of the objects in the acquisition trial was excluded from the final analysis.

For the RL test, rats (N = 60) maintained at 90% free-feeding weight were trained to perform an operant reversal learning task and then tested using a method previously described in detail (Neill et al., 2016). During the PCP treatment phase, animals were not trained in the RL task to avoid an association between drug treatment and cognitive performance. On the day of testing, rats were randomly assigned to six treatment groups (n = 9 to 10 per group) to receive an acute treatment with IRL752 (4.7, 14, or 47 µmol/kg, s.c., 45 minutes prior to testing), the DA D1 receptor agonist SKF38393 (6 mg/kg, i.p.), or vehicle before testing in the reversal learning task. We tested a lower dose range here because of behavioral disruption observed at the highest dose of 140 µmol/kg in NOR and efficacy at the lowest dose tested, 15.6 µmol/kg, to avoid behavioral impairment and to determine the minimal effective dose. The percentage of correct responses was calculated in each phase. In the initial phase of the reversal task session, the reward contingency was the same as the previous day, and the test was terminated at 5 minutes or when the animal had earned 20 pellets of food, whichever occurred first. After the initial phase, the rat remained in the test chamber for a 2-minute time-out period in which the house light was extinguished to serve as a cue that the rule was about to change. In the reversal phase, the reward contingency was reversed, and the test was repeated as described above; again this lasted for 5 minutes or the time taken to earn 20 pellets.

In/Ex Vivo Gene Expression.

The expression of mRNAs encoding glutamate decarboxylase 67, glutamate dehydrogenase, proenkephalin as well as the immediate early genes (IEGs) activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein (Arc), c-fos, early growth response protein 1 (egr1), neuronal PAS domain protein 4 (Npas4), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a postsynaptic density scaffolding protein (Homer1), and neuronal pentraxin-2 protein (Nptx2) was assessed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in tissue homogenates of the striatum, hippocampus, frontal cortex, and limbic regions (containing nucleus accumbens, most parts of the olfactory tubercle, ventral pallidum, and amygdala) collected 65 minutes after administration of IRL752 (11–100 µmol/kg, s.c.) to normal rats immediately subsequent to completion of the behavioral activity–monitoring recording sessions described above. Tissue samples were stored at −80°C until further processing. For analysis details, see Supplemental Material.

In Vivo Microdialysis.

The effect of IRL752 on extracellular levels of monoamines and their metabolites (DA, NA, 5-HT, DOPA, 3-MT, HVA, and 5-HIAA) and of acetylcholine (ACh) was studied by means of dual-probe in vivo microdialysis methodology, as previously described (Ponten et al., 2010; Jerlhag et al., 2012). In brief, rats were anesthetized with isoflurane, and homemade (see Waters et al., 1993) I-shaped microdialysis probes (20,000 kDa cut off with an o.d./i.d. of 310/220 µm, HOSPAL; Gambro, Lund, Sweden) were stereotaxically (Paxinos and Watson, 2009) implanted into the prefrontal cortex (PFC) (AP +3.2, ML −0.7, DV −4.0; membrane length, m.l. = 2.5 mm) and striatum (AP +1.0, ML −2.6, DV −6.2; m.l. = 3.0 mm) or, alternatively, into the dorsal (AP −4.0, ML −2.5, DV −4.4; m.l. = 2.0 mm) or ventral hippocampus (AP −6.0, ML +4.8, DV −8.0; m.l. = 4.0 mm) and nucleus accumbens (AP +1.85, ML −1.6, DV −7.8; m.l. = 2.0 mm). Probes for monitoring the levels of ACh after IRL752 were placed in the PFC (AP +3.0, ML −0.7, DV −4.0; m.l. = 3.0 mm) and the ventral hippocampus (AP −5.2, ML +4.8, DV −8.0; m.l. = 3.0 mm). The rats were housed individually in their home cages for 36–48 hours before the dialysis experiments. The microdialysis was performed during daytime under freely moving conditions with the rats connected to a microperfusion pump (perfusion speed 2 µl/min) via a swivel system through which 40-µl samples were collected every 20 minutes. After at least 100 minutes perfusion to establish balanced fluid exchange and baseline dialysate levels of analytes (typically between 10.00 hours and noon), IRL752 was administered subcutaneously (injection volume 5 ml/kg); vehicle controls received corresponding 0.9% NaCl injection. Dialysate samples were then collected every 20 minutes for the consecutive 3 hours, and dialysate contents of monoamines and corresponding metabolites (see above) or of ACh were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography/electrical detection or liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry techniques, respectively, according to methods described elsewhere (Jerlhag et al., 2012; Waters et al., 2017). At termination, the brains were removed rapidly and fixated in Accustain solution (Sigma-Aldrich) for verification of probe placement.

Central Nervous System Drug Exposure after Systemic or Local Administration.

The in vivo central nervous system (CNS) exposure of IRL752 was gauged in two preliminary experiments after either systemic or local intracortical perfusion of the drug. In the first experiment, the drug was administered to two rats at a dose of 16.7 µmol/kg, s.c., and PFC and striatal dialysates were sampled and analyzed for IRL752 concentrations for up to 3 hours thereafter. In a second experiment (n = 2), the drug was locally applied in consecutively increasing concentrations (1, 10, and 100 µM; 3 × 20 minutes perfusion/concentration level) to the PFC via the dialysis perfusion medium (2 µl/min), during which the effects on NA and DA output were simultaneously followed in the dialysates; levels of IRL752 were not analyzed in this experiment.

Statistics.

In/ex vivo neurochemistry.

Neurochemical results are presented as percent of control mean ± S.E.M. (n = 4 per group). Statistical significance versus corresponding controls was assessed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test (two-sided). Probability levels <0.05 were considered significant.

Motor activity.

Motor activity data are presented as accumulated motor activity counts 0–60 minutes, percent of corresponding vehicle controls, and mean ± S.E.M. (n = 4 to 5/group). Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test (two-sided) versus controls or other relevant comparison treatment group. Probability levels <0.05 were considered significant.

In/ex vivo gene expression.

Gene expression results are presented as percent of control mean ± S.E.M. (n = 5/group). Statistical significance versus corresponding controls was assessed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test (two-sided). Probability levels <0.05 were considered significant.

Cognitive behavioral tests.

All data are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. (n = 9 to 10). NOR data were analyzed via two-way ANOVA with factors of drug and exploration time of the two objects (two identical objects in the acquisition phase and novel and familiar objects in the retention phase) and via one-way ANOVA (line crossings). Time spent exploring the objects was analyzed using paired Student’s t test, and post hoc analysis was carried out after a one-way ANOVA followed by least significant difference t test (line crossings). RL data were arcsine transformed and then analyzed via one-way ANOVA to detect the main effect of drug treatment in the initial and reversal phases of the task. When a significant effect (P < 0.05) was detected, a post hoc least significant difference t test was performed to compare treatment groups with the appropriate control group.

In vivo microdialysis.

In vivo microdialysis data are expressed as percent of baseline values averaged from the levels of three consecutive samples collected prior to drug administration. Statistical significance was assessed by means of a three-way ANOVA for repeated measures, with time, treatment, and region as factors. Probability levels <0.05 were considered significant.

Results

In summary, IRL752 displayed its highest in vitro affinities for 5-HT and NA-related targets. The compound also induced dose-dependent and regioselective alterations in brain monoamine transmission indices and gene expression. Behaviorally, IRL752 had no significant effect on acute hyperdopaminergic or hypoglutamatergic motor responses but reversed deficits resulting from hypomonoaminergic function. The compound also proved effective in correcting subchronic PCP-induced impairments in models of cognitive function.

In Vitro Target Binding and Functional Profile of IRL752.

The in vitro profiling of IRL752 showed that the compound displayed its highest affinity at human 5-HT7 receptors (Ki = 980 nM) and Sigma-1 receptor (σ1) receptors (1.2 µM), whereas the affinity for 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors was 8.1 and 6.6 µM, respectively (Fig. 1; Table 1). IRL752 also displayed affinity for the 5-HT transporter (SERT; Ki = 2.5 µM) and to a lesser extent the NA transporter (NAT; Ki = 8.1 µM). With respect to α-adrenoceptor subtypes, IRL752 was most potent at α2C and α2A (Ki = 3.8 and 6.5 µM, respectively), whereas the affinity for the α1 receptor was ∼3–6 times less potent (Ki = 21 µM). Affinity for the rat κ receptor was 6.5 µM. IRL752 was inactive (<20% binding at 10 µM) for the remainder of targets assessed (n = 55; see Supplemental Material).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

IRL752 IC50/Ki values for selected human target proteins

For assay details, see https://www.eurofinsdiscoveryservices.com/cms/cms-content/services/in-vitro-assays/.

IRL752 was further investigated in vitro in cellular functional assays designed to detect intrinsic activity at human recombinant α2A, α2C, 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, and 5-HT7 receptors. The compound did not show any agonist-like properties at the α2-adrenoceptor and 5-HT7 targets (up to 100 µM; unpublished data) but displayed antagonist effects at the α2A, 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, and 5-HT7 receptors (see Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Antagonist effects in cellular functional assays (human receptors)

For assay details, see https://www.eurofinsdiscoveryservices.com/cms/cms-content/services/in-vitro-assays/.

IRL752 Effects on In/Ex Vivo Brain Monoamine Neurochemistry.

IRL752 (3.7–100 µmol/kg, s.c.) resulted in small, although regioselective, effects on post-mortem rat brain tissue levels of monoamines and their corresponding metabolites. Thus, the compound induced a significant dose-dependent reduction (max ∼15%) of cortical NA and of striatal 3-MT. There was also a trend to dose-related but nonsignificant reductions in limbic and striatal DA and in cortical DOPA after IRL752 but only marginal, inconsistent changes in HVA, 5-HT, and 5-HIAA across brain regions (Figs. 2 and 3). Levels of normetanephrine were not detectable in any of the regions analyzed (too-small peaks and/or obscured by nearby peaks) and are therefore left out of Fig. 3.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

In/ex vivo experiment design overview. Vehicle or IRL752 was given 4 or 5 minutes prior to locomotor and behavioral monitoring recordings (see further Materials and Methods), and 60 minutes later this was followed by termination and dissection of brain tissue for subsequent analysis of regional levels of monoamine neurochemical indices and gene expression patterns. Doses and times are given in the overview boxes.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Effects of IRL752 on monoaminergic neurochemistry in different rat brain regions. Shown is the effect of IRL752 (0.8–21.3 mg/kg = 3.7–100 µmol/kg, s.c.) in the rat limbic (Limb), striatum (Stri), and cortical (Ctx) regions 65 minutes after drug administration. Monoaminergic indices measured were: NA, DA, DOPA, HVA, 3-MT, 5-HT, and 5-HIAA. Shown are the mean ± S.E.M. (n = 4) expressed as percentage of control (saline; NaCl 0.9% w/v) group means. Statistics: one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test (two-sided) vs. corresponding controls: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.025. Ctrl, control; N.D., not detectable.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Cognition experimental design overview. Subchronically PCP-treated animals were treated with either vehicle, IRL752, or reference agents 30, 45, or 60 minutes prior to cognitive model test sessions. Doses and pretreatment times for the different treatments and cognitive test models are given in the overview boxes.

Behavioral Assessment of IRL752.

The effects of IRL752 on locomotor activity in rats were assessed under different experimental conditions. To obtain a broad behavioral characterization, IRL752 was studied in otherwise untreated (acutely or after habituation) rats but also after tetrabenazine, d-amphetamine, or dizocilpine (MK-801) to assess the activity of the compound in acute hypomonoaminergic, hyperdopaminergic, and hypoglutamatergic brain states, respectively.

IRL752 effect on spontaneous motor activity in the untreated or habituated state.

In an initial study, IRL752 at doses of 3.7–100 µmol/kg had but a modest, nonsignificant impact on spontaneous locomotor activity in nonpretreated rats (max 50% ± 35% increase; Table 3). In a second study (unpublished data), doses from 33 to 300 µmol/kg were likewise without significant effect on spontaneous locomotor activity, indicating no major effects of the substance on psychomotor function in otherwise untreated animals. To check for any potential delayed impact on rat behavior, the effect of IRL752 (33 µmol/kg, s.c.) was also monitored 0–180 minutes postdosing but revealed no stimulation of locomotor activity by IRL752 compared with vehicle controls run in parallel (unpublished fata). Neither had IRL752 (11–100 µmol/kg, s.c.) had any consistent effect on locomotor activity during 0–60 minutes postdrug administration in rats habituated to their environment and expressing very low baseline activity (Table 3), thus indicating a lack of stimulant properties even when the sensitivity of the model was enhanced to capture subtle drug-induced behavioral activation.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Summary of effects of IRL752 on rat motor activity under different cotreatment conditions

Data expressed as accumulated motor activity counts 0–60 min, percent of corresponding vehicle controls, mean ± S.E.M. (n).

IRL752 effect on locomotor activity in d-amphetamine and MK-801 pretreated rats.

Across the dose range tested in nonpretreated rats (i.e., 11–100 µmol/kg, s.c.; see above), IRL752 did not influence d-amphetamine (1.5 mg/kg, i.p.)-induced hyperactivity (∼300% of non-IRL752 controls) in rats (Table 3). Similarly, IRL752 in the same dose range mildly and nonsignificantly, at best, affected locomotor hyperactivity in MK-801 (0.2 or 0.7 mg/kg, i.p.; ∼300% and 950% of non-IRL752 controls) pretreated rats (Table 3). Thus, whereas IRL752 at the dose of 11 µmol/kg tended to attenuate MK-801 (0.7 mg/kg)-induced hyperlocomotion, an additional study with IRL752 across 3.7–33 µmol/kg, s.c., did not further substantiate this observation (unpublished data). Similarly, IRL752 (100 µmol/kg, s.c.) only tended to partly—again nonsignificantly (P < 0.2)—reduce the behavioral activation induced by 0.2 mg/kg MK-801 (Table 3).

IRL752 effect on locomotor activity in tetrabenazine pretreated rats.

Tetrabenazine (0.64 mg/kg, s.c.) administration resulted in a 50% ± 5% inhibition of locomotor activity versus vehicle controls. This reduction was significantly reversed (to 91% ± 10% of vehicle control levels) by IRL752 (100 µmol/kg; Table 3).

IRL752 Effects in Cognitive Behavioral Tests.

The effects of IRL752 on cognitive functioning were assessed in the NOR and RL paradigms with regard to capacity to attenuate deficits induced by subchronic treatment with the NMDA receptor antagonist PCP. These tests are considered to reflect visual recognition memory, problem solving, and reasoning (Neill et al., 2010).

IRL752 effect on NOR.

There was no significant interaction between treatment and object exploration during the acquisition phase (two-way ANOVA). In addition, there were no significant differences in the exploration time of two identical objects for any group (Fig. 5a). In the retention phase, there was a significant interaction between treatment and object exploration (F5, 99 = 5.2; P < 0.001). Vehicle-treated rats spent significantly more time exploring the novel object compared with the familiar object (P < 0.05), whereas rats treated with scPCP showed deficits in the ability to discriminate between the novel and familiar objects (Fig. 5b). The scPCP-induced impairment in NOR was reversed by the two lower doses of IRL752 (15.6 µmol/kg, P < 0.01; 47 µmol/kg, P < 0.05) and by the reference D2 receptor antagonist risperidone 0.1 mg/kg (P < 0.001). The highest dose of IRL752 (140 µmol/kg) did not significantly attenuate the scPCP-induced impairments in NOR. Data did not demonstrate any significant reduction in line crossings in either phase of the task when compared with vehicle (see Supplemental Material). However, only two rats completed the task at the highest dose of 140 µmol/kg; the remaining eight rats failed to complete the test because of a reduction in exploratory behavior.

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Effects of IRL752 in the NOR test. Shown is the effect of IRL752 (3.33–30 mg/kg = 15.6–140 µmol/kg, s.c., 30 minutes prior to testing) or risperidone (0.1 mg/kg i.p., 60 minutes prior to testing) on scPCP-induced impairment of novel object recognition in the rat. (a) Exploration time (s) of two identical objects (A and B) in the acquisition phase after acute treatment; (b) exploration time (s) of a familiar object and a novel object in the 3-minute retention trial. All data are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. (n = 2–10 per group) and were analyzed by Student’s paired t test; significant differences between time spent exploring the familiar and novel object *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. sc, subchronic.

IRL752 effect on RL.

In the initial phase of the reversal learning task, there was no effect of drug treatment on the percentage of correct responses (Fig. 6, left). In the reversal phase of the task, there was a significant effect of drug treatment on correct responses (F5, 58 = 7.1; P < 0.001). scPCP treatment resulted in significantly impaired performance compared with vehicle (P < 0.001; Fig. 6, right). This impairment was dose-dependently and significantly attenuated by IRL752 to the level of vehicle control performance. Thus, although the lowest dose (4.7 µmol/kg) appeared ineffective compared with scPCP only, the middle dose (14 µmol/kg) approached significant attenuation levels (P = 0.055), and the highest dose (47 µmol/kg, P < 0.001) fully abolished the scPCP-induced impairment of RL (Fig. 6, right). Treatment with the reference D1 dopamine receptor agonist SKF38393 (6.0 mg/kg) also significantly reversed scPCP-induced impairments in this task (P < 0.01). There were no significant effects of any drug treatment on the total number of lever presses in this experiment (see Supplemental Material).

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Effects of IRL752 in the RL test. The effect of acute treatment with IRL752 (1.0–10 mg/kg = 4.7–47 µmol/kg, s.c, 45 minutes prior to testing) and SKF38393 (6 mg/kg, i.p, 60 minutes prior to testing) on scPCP-induced impairment on performance in the reversal learning task. Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M. % correct responding (n = 9 to 10) and were analyzed by ANOVA and post hoc Dunnett’s test. Significant reduction in percent correct responding in the reversal phase compared with the vehicle group ***P < 0.001. Improvement in responding compared with scPCP alone in the reversal phase; P = 0.055; ##P < 0.01; ###P < 0.01. sc, subchronic.

IRL752 Effects on In/Ex Vivo Brain Tissue Gene Expression.

The most consistent effects on gene expression seen after IRL752 (11–100 µmol/kg, s.c.) were dose-related increases (∼1.5- to 2-fold those of corresponding controls) in the rapid IEGs Arc, c-fos, EGR1, and Npas4 mRNA, primarily in limbic, striatal, and cortical regions; the delayed IEGs BDNF, Homer1, and Nptx2 remained essentially unchanged across all brain areas, as did the hippocampal expression versus controls of the genes monitored (Fig. 7). No significant changes versus controls were found in the mRNA expression levels of glutamate decarboxylase, glutamate dehydrogenase, and proenkephalin, regardless of brain region (unpublished data).

Fig. 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

Effects of IRL752 on gene expression in different brain regions, measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Shown are the gene expression (mRNA levels) effects of IRL752 (2.4–21.3 mg/kg = 11–100 µmol/kg, s.c.) in the rat limbic region (Limb), striatum (Stri), frontal cortex (Ctx) and hippocampus (Hipp) 65 minutes after administration; controls received corresponding vehicle injection (saline; NaCl 0.9% v/w). Genes monitored were: Arc, c-fos (cellular DNA-binding proteins encoded by the c-fos genes), egr1, Npas4, BDNF, Homer1 (a postsynaptic scaffolding protein), and Nptx2. Genes are divided into “Rapid” and “Delayed” onset IEGs, as shown in the graph. Results are presented as percentage of controls (mean ± S.E.M.; n = 5 animals/treatment group). Statistics: one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test (two-sided), *P < 0.05; **P < 0.025; ***P < 0.01 vs. corresponding controls. Data are sorted by gene, then by region, and then by ascending dose from left to right. Ctrl, control.

IRL752: In Vivo Microdialysis.

The dose-response relationship for IRL752 with respect to the efflux of catecholamines in the PFC as compared with the striatum is illustrated in Figs. 8 and 9.

Fig. 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 8.

IRL752 time course of effects on rat brain regional dialysate levels of DA (top panels) and NA (bottom panels). Effect of IRL752 (5.6–150 µmol/kg, s.c.; dose color scheme from light to dark blue) on dialysate DA and NA in the rat PFC (n = 4–7; left panels) and striatum (Stri) (n = 3–6; right top panel, and n = 4 and n = 1–3 for 5.6–16.7 and 50–150 µmol/kg, respectively; right bottom panel) 0–180 minutes after administration. Shown are the mean dialysate levels/20-minute sample ±S.E.M. expressed as percentage of baseline values (average of the three fractions collected 40 to 0 minutes before dosing).

Fig. 9.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 9.

IRL752 time-course effects on rat brain regional dialysate levels of serotonin (5-HT). Effect of IRL752 (5.6–150 µmol/kg, s.c.; dose color scheme from light to dark blue) on dialysate 5-HT in the rat PFC (n = 2–7; left panel) and striatum (Stri) (n = 2–6; right panel), 0–180 minutes after administration. Shown are the mean dialysate levels/20-minute sample ±S.E.M. expressed as percentage of baseline values (average of the three fractions collected 40 to 0 minutes before dosing).

IRL752 (5.6–150 µmol/kg, s.c.) resulted in a dose- and time-related and regionally selective increase in extracellular monoamines and their metabolites. Thus, there was a dose-dependent increase in DA in the PFC peaking at ∼600% of baseline at 60–80 minutes after administration of the top dose [significant effect of 1): F4, 13 = 20.5, P = 0.000016, 2) region: F1, 13 = 58.1, P = 0.000004, 3) dose*time: F36, 117 = 6.4, P < 0.00001, 4) dose*region: F4, 13 = 16.2, P < 0.00001, and 5) dose*time*region: F36, 117 = 6.3, P < 0.00001; Fig. 8], whereas the levels of the transmitter remained essentially unchanged in typical DA-dominated brain areas like the striatum and the nucleus accumbens (Table 4). The regioselectivity of IRL752 extended also to NA in that the PFC levels of this amine increased to a maximum of ∼750% of baseline at 60 minutes postadministration of the top dose, whereas striatal NA peaked at only ∼250% of baseline [significant effect of 1) dose: F4, 8 = 37.7, P = 0.00003, 2) region: F1, 8 = 66.5, P = 0.00004, 3) dose*time: F36, 72 = 8.76, P < 0.00001, 4) dose*region: F4, 8 = 23.2, P = 0.00019, and 5) dose*time*region: F36, 72 = 6.3, P < 0.00001; Fig. 8]. The main DA metabolite, DOPA, increased only slightly in the PFC and remained unchanged in the striatum (unpublished data).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4

Comparison of the peak effects of IRL752 on extracellular amines in different brain regions

Shown is the peak effect of IRL752 (50 µmol/kg = 10.7 mg/kg, s.c) expressed as % of baseline in dorsal hippocampus, ventral hippocampus, nucleus accumbens, PFC, and striatum.

The impact of IRL752 on dialysate 5 HT was generally less marked; also, although dose- and time-dependent, it did not display significant regioselectivity (dose: F4, 11 = 7.47, P = 0.0037, region: F1, 11 = 0.46, P = 0.51, dose*time: F36, 99 = 3.25, P = 0.000002, and dose*region: F4, 11 = 0.12, P = 0.97; see Fig. 9; Table 4). The level of the main metabolite of serotonin, 5-HIAA, was not significantly changed over the dose range tested (unpublished data).

The effect of IRL752 (50 µmol/kg, s.c.) on dialysate monoamines across several different brain regions was also compared. Overall, the data show that IRL752 impacts the PFC and ventral hippocampal output of DA and NA to a larger extent than in other brain areas (Table 4).

IRL752 (50 µmol/kg, s.c.) elevated the dialysate levels of ACh to a maximum of ∼250% and ∼190% of corresponding baseline in the PFC and ventral hippocampus, respectively, in the 80’ postinjection samples (Fig. 10). Resembling the effects seen on catecholamines (above), there was a near-significant effect of region (F1, 5 = 6.15, P = 0.056) and dose*time*region (F9, 45 = 2.00, P = 0.061). Separate two-way ANOVA (repeated-measures) in the PFC showed significant effects of time (F13, 65 = 3.13, P = 0.001) and of dose*time (F13, 65 = 2.05, P = 0.03), whereas only the time effect proved significant in the ventral hippocampus (F13, 52 = 2.58, P = 0.008).

Fig. 10.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 10.

IRL752 time-course effects on ACh in rat PFC and ventral hippocampus dialysates. IRL752 was given at 50 µmol/kg s.c., and PFC (left panel) or ventral hippocampus (right panel) dialysate levels of ACh were monitored for 3 hours post–drug administration. Shown are the mean dialysate levels/20-minute sample ±S.E.M. expressed as percentage of baseline values (average of the three fractions collected from 40 to 0 minutes before dosing), mean ± S.E.M. (n = 2–4).

IRL752: CNS Drug Exposure—Levels and Functional Effect.

Preliminary experiments aiming to establish the relation between brain exposure of IRL752 and functional effects were carried out using microdialysis sampling and reverse dialysis perfusion of the drug.

IRL752 (16.7 µmol/kg, s.c.) resulted in peak concentrations of the drug in cortical and striatal dialysates, amounting to ∼400 nmol/l 40–60 minute after administration (see Supplemental Material). With an estimated probe recovery of IRL752 of ∼10%–12%, this corresponds to brain extracellular levels of the drug in the range of ∼3 to 4 µM. This is in fairly good agreement with an estimation of unbound brain concentrations around ∼2 µM at this dose, which was obtained by a different approach and derived from data on unbound peak plasma concentrations of IRL752 after 11 and 50 µmol/kg, s.c, assuming no active transport across the blood-brain barrier (unpublished data). Taking a conservative approach, the approximate free-CNS exposure would thus range between 1 and 6 µM in the 11–50 µmol/kg s.c. dose interval (Fig. 1). Local reverse dialysis perfusion of IRL752 (1, 10, and 100 µM; 3 × 20 minute/concentration level) via the probe into the PFC resulted in increased catecholamine output: 10 µM to ∼250% (DA) and ∼350% (NA), 100 µM to ∼360% (DA), and ∼650% (NA) of baseline levels (Supplemental Material).

Discussion

The in vivo profile of the novel phenyl-pyrrolidine IRL752 is consistent with its characterization as a multitarget, regioselective cortical neurotransmission enhancer with potential clinical usefulness in, for example, Parkinson disease dementia (PD-D) or other cognitive insufficiencies. The neurochemical properties of IRL752 suggest a concerted impact on PFC catecholamine and cholinergic neurotransmission and synaptic activity–related gene expression and a capability to reverse motor hypofunction and impairments in models of cognitive failure but without major effect in either normal or drug-induced hyperactive behavioral states. Taken together, the findings suggest a capacity to strengthen multiple systems believed to be impaired in motor and cognitive deficiency manifestations.

The pharmacological profile of IRL752 differs from other drugs known to modulate cortical monoamine transmission (e.g., monoamine reuptake inhibitors, psychostimulants, antidepressants, or antipsychotics). In addition to the striking cortical-over-basal-ganglia catecholamine transmission-promoting selectivity profile of IRL752, the brain tissue neurochemical data suggest that the compound does not to any major extent activate or inhibit negative feedback mechanisms on neurotransmission in monoaminergic projection areas. Moreover, its behavioral activity features indicate that IRL752 lacks stimulatory or inhibitory effects on motor function in normal states while reversing behavioral inhibition in tetrabenazine-treated rats—an experimental animal model of deficient catecholamine transmission, like in PD. Also, IRL752 does not affect d-amphetamine–induced hyperactivity and only mildly and inconsistently attenuated MK-801 (dizocilpine)-induced hyperactivity, which is thus indicative of low impact on acute hyperdopaminergic and hypoglutamatergic states.

Interestingly, IRL752 displayed clear-cut procognitive effects in the NOR and RL tests, reversing the cognitive impairment induced by scPCP administration. It has been shown that scPCP abolishes the increase in PFC DA during a NOR retention trial, which is suggested to underlie the accompanying cognitive deficiency seen after this treatment (McLean et al., 2017). In this context, the ability of IRL752 to enhance extracellular levels of DA and NA in the PFC but not in (the DA-dominated) striatal and nucleus accumbens areas is particularly noteworthy. The cortical catecholamine increases were likewise accompanied by increases in ACh in this region and (to a lesser extent) in the ventral hippocampus. The neurochemical signature as well as the behavioral profile of the compound is thus distinct from that of psychostimulants (e.g., phencyclidine and d-amphetamine) (Hertel et al., 1995) and indicates a disparate biologic substrate for the transmission-promoting effect of IRL752. The PFC is generally considered to be of key importance for cognitive function, with a pivotal role repeatedly being ascribed to intact catecholaminergic neurotransmission in this region (Arnsten, 1998; Robbins and Arnsten, 2009; Arnsten, 2011; Robbins and Cools, 2014; Millan et al., 2016). The association of ACh loss with deterioration of cognitive processes is likewise well-established. Indeed, there is ample evidence that executive and other cognitive functional impairment in PD-D may be associated with PFC DA as well as forebrain cholinergic deficits (Bohnen et al., 2003; Hilker et al., 2005; Narayanan et al., 2013; Gratwicke et al., 2015). Taken together, it is therefore suggested that IRL752 with its balanced and regionally selective transmission-strengthening properties across catecholamine and ACh systems may find clinical usefulness in conditions like PD-D.

The observed IRL752-induced changes in gene expression pattern are consistent with the above idea. Thus, the compound caused dose-dependent increases in the expression of mRNA for the rapid IEGs Arc, c-fos, egr1, and Npas4. The corresponding transcription factors and effector proteins are known to be linked to neuronal plasticity, recent neuronal and synaptic activity, and associated procognitive action (e.g., Okuno, 2011; Sun and Lin, 2016). For example, Arc is involved in the consolidation of memory and in connected processes, such as long-term potentiation, and is triggered intra-arterially by synaptic NMDA receptor–related mechanisms (Bramham et al., 2010) associated with enhanced monoamine transmission (Millan et al., 2016). Npas4 is uniquely activated by neuronal activity versus extracellular factors, is expressed only in neurones, and affects synaptic connections in both excitatory and inhibitory neurons, thereby providing another important IEG link between neuronal activity, learning, and memory (Sun and Lin, 2016).

The distinctive in vivo pharmacological profile of IRL752 likely reflects a joint impact on more than one target. Based on the in vitro characterization of IRL752, it is hypothesized that a combination of antagonism at 5-HT7 and α2-adrenoceptors may be primarily underlying the potent regioselective increase in PFC monoamine-dependent neurotransmission. Preliminary CNS IRL752 exposure data concur with this prediction. Although antagonism of 5-HT7 receptors has been demonstrated to contribute to enhanced cortical DA efflux, the neuronal localization of any such action remains to be determined (see Wesołowska and Kowalska, 2008; Blattner et al., 2019). Selective blockade of α2C-adrenoreceptors relative to (mainly postsynaptic; Erdozain et al., 2019) α2A-adrenoceptors also seems to promote DA in the PFC (see Uys et al., 2017a, and references cited within), whereas α2A-adrenoceptor antagonism may be important for boosting ACh output (Zaborszky et al., 2004). Although a potential contributory effect from inhibition of SERT cannot be entirely ruled out based on currently available data, the in/ex vivo neurochemical profile of IRL752 clearly differs from typical SERT inhibitors. Finally, the σ1 receptor affinity of IRL752 may additionally imply an effect on cell survival mechanisms and neuroplasticity (e.g., Nguyen et al., 2015). Notably, all the aforementioned targets are believed highly relevant to the functioning of cognition circuits and processes (e.g., Nikiforuk, 2015; Millan et al., 2016; Maurice and Goguadze, 2017; Uys et al., 2017a).

Multiple Target Action of IRL752.

Pharma drug development typically remains strictly (single…) target-focused. There is growing appreciation and optimism, however, that a more comprehensive approach might eventually prove more successful (Hutson et al., 2017). IRL752 was discovered using a multivariate in vivo phenotypic pattern (in vivo systems pharmacology) analysis, including neurochemical and behavioral effects broadly, benchmarked against a wide range of known, clinically characterized CNS agents (Waters et al., 2017). Although from a single neuroreceptor target point of view, IRL752 may be viewed as moderately potent, the relative lack of selectivity and potency may in fact turn out to be an advantage. First, needless to say, no single drug target works in isolation but is integrated with multiple other components in systems, networks, and circuits to adjust (patho)physiologically disrupted function. Secondly, factors like the sensitivity of, and tone at, the target, as well as occupancy-response relation, vary greatly among brain areas, transmitter circuits, and synapses, underscoring that “the brain is no democracy” and thereby providing an opportunity for regioselectivity in drug action. Thirdly, drug combination treatments to modulate the activity of more than one neuronal target are in fact very common in the treatment of symptoms associated with CNS disorders, whether they are of psychiatric and/or other cognitive background (e.g., Mojtabai and Olfson, 2010). Finally, together with the above, it may be hypothesized that the joint contribution of moderate modulatory activities at two or more neurotargets in a network by a single agent may result in superior therapeutic characteristics compared with combination attempts using several different potent and selective drugs (see, e.g., Csermely et al., 2005; Tun et al., 2011). Indeed, approved CNS drugs or (fixed-dose) combinations with intended polypharmacological (“enriched”) target profiles are becoming increasingly common in recent years (e.g., vortioxetine, lurasidone, brexpiprazole) in endeavors to both improve efficacy and circumvent side-effect issues (Peters, 2013).

Summary and Conclusions.

This paper describes for the first time the novel, distinctive pharmacological action profile of a new compound, IRL752. The behavioral characteristics of IRL752 are consistent with a capacity to normalize impaired catecholamine function while avoiding overactivation of CNS systems and circuits involved. In vitro target affinity, functional response, and accompanying drug exposure data suggest that at least 5-HT7 receptor and α2(C)-adrenoceptor antagonism are likely key contributors to the in vivo effects of IRL752. Interestingly, in comparison with other agents with clinically proven or purported procognitive properties, IRL752 displays similarities but also clearly distinguishing features (Table 5). Its 1) cortically regioselective, facilitatory impact on catecholamine neurotransmission, without significant feedback activation; 2) increases in ACh transmission and cognitive function-associated IEG indices; and 3) demonstration that IRL752 effectively reverses cognitive deficits in rodent tests of recognition memory and of cognitive flexibility/problem solving are in line with clinical usefulness of the drug in conditions wherein these aspects may be dysregulated, such as in PD axial motor and cognition deficits.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 5

Summary overview of microdialysis, behavioral, and gene expression effects of IRL752 and selected procognitive comparators

Sources for comparator data cited: Atomoxetine: Bymaster et al., 2002; Swanson et al., 2006; Tzavara et al., 2006; Cain et al., 2011; IRL AB, unpublished data. Methylphenidate: Gerasimov et al., 2000; Bymaster et al., 2002; Marsteller et al., 2002; Berridge et al., 2006; Tzavara et al., 2006; Banerjee et al., 2009; Seu and Jentsch, 2009; Rowley et al., 2014; IRL AB, unpublished data. Clozapine: Hertel et al., 1997; Westerink et al., 2001; Ichikawa et al., 2002; Shirazi-Southall et al., 2002; Devoto et al., 2003; Shilliam and Dawson, 2005; Abdul-Monim et al., 2006; Grayson et al., 2007; Robbins et al., 2008; IRL AB, unpublished data. Cariprazine: Neill et al., 2016; Kehr et al., 2018; Huang et al., 2019; Waters et al., 2020; IRL AB, unpublished data. Vortioxetine: Mørk et al., 2013; Pehrson et al., 2013, 2018; du Jardin et al., 2014; Wallace et al., 2014; IRL AB, unpublished data. Atipamezole: Kauppila et al., 1991; Haapalinna et al., 1998; Tellez et al., 1999; Devoto et al., 2003; Lapiz and Morilak, 2006; Bondi et al., 2010; Mervaala et al., 1993; IRL AB, unpublished data. Idazoxan: Devauges and Sara, 1990; Coull et al., 1996; Hertel et al., 1997; Tellez et al., 1999; Swanson et al., 2006; Uys et al., 2017b; IRL AB, unpublished data. Fluparoxan: Tellez et al., 1999; Millan et al., 2000; Borthwick, 2017; IRL AB, unpublished data. Disclaimer: Permutations of experimental conditions and differences in set-ups between laboratories preclude direct head-to-head comparisons of efficacies and responses among agents. This applies broadly but may be particularly apparent with regard to cognitive behavioral testing.

In support, IRL752 improved postural dysfunction and axial motor symptoms (UDPRS motor scores) in a recent phase IIa study in patients with PD (Svenningsson et al., 2020). Cognitive deficits in PD are strongly associated with such motor impairments; pharmacologically boosting executive as well as attentional functional strategies will likely counter the motor shortcomings and prevent falls (e.g., (Taylor et al., 2008). Notably, significant improvement in the patients who were treated with IRL752 was also seen with respect to the motivation/initiative domain in the UDPRS assessment, a finding substantiated by greatly decreased scores for apathy/indifference and caregiver distress in the neuropsychiatric inventory. In conclusion, the preclinical profile of IRL752 supports its potential usefulness in the treatment of cognitive and axial motor deficits in PD. Data from phase I and IIa clinical trials with IRL752 indicate that it is safe and well-tolerated both in healthy volunteers and in patients with PD. Further exploration of IRL752 efficacy with respect to improved balance, reduced falls, and markers of improved cognition will be carried out in planned phase IIb trials.

Acknowledgments

We thank Anette Nydén, Håkan Schyllander, Maria Gullme, Sverker von Unge, and Fredrik Pettersson for synthesizing the IRL752 batches used in the study. The skillful technical assistance of Anna Carin Jansson, Marianne Thorngren, and Katarina Rydén Markinhuhta in performing the experiments described in this report is gratefully acknowledged.

Authorship Contributions

Participated in research design: Hjorth, S. Waters, N. Waters, Tedroff, McLean, Grayson, Neill, Sonesson.

Conducted experiments: Fagerberg, Edling, Svanberg, Ljung, Gunnergren, McLean, Grayson, Idris.

Performed data analysis: Hjorth, S. Waters, McLean, Grayson, Neill.

Wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript: Hjorth, S. Waters, N. Waters, Tedroff, Svensson, Fagerberg, Edling, Svanberg, Ljung, Gunnergren, McLean, Grayson, Idris, Neill, Sonesson.

Footnotes

    • Received April 2, 2020.
    • Accepted June 25, 2020.
  • No financial support was received for the studies reported. Financial disclosures: S.W., N.W., J.T., P.S., A.F., M.E., B.S., E.L., J.G., and C.S. are full- or part-time employees of Integrative Research Laboratories Sweden (IRL AB) and own stock in the company. S.H. is a consultant to IRL AB and owns stock in the company. In the past 3 years, S.H. has received honoraria for consultancy from Otsuka, Lundbeck, and Recordati. J.C.N., B.G., S.L.M., and N.F.I. conducted the cognition test studies reported in the manuscript via the Contract Research Organisation b-neuro, covered by a fee-for-service contract between University of Manchester (UoM) and IRL AB. In the past 3 years, J.C.N. has also received honoraria for consultancy from Janssen and Lundbeck.

  • https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.120.000037.

  • ↵Embedded ImageThis article has supplemental material available at jpet.aspetjournals.org.

Abbreviations

σ1
Sigma-1 receptor
ACh
acetylcholine
AP
anterior-posterior
Arc
activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein
BDNF
brain-derived neurotrophic factor
CNS
central nervous system
DA
dopamine
DV
dorsal-ventral
EGR1
early growth response protein 1
5-HIAA
5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid
5-HT
5-hydroxytryptamine
HVA
homovanillic acid
IEG
immediate early gene
IRL752
(3S)‐3‐(2,3‐difluorophenyl)‐3‐methoxypyrrolidine
IRL AB
Integrative Research Laboratories Sweden AB
ML
medial-lateral
3-MT
3-methoxytyramine
NA
noradrenaline
NAT
NA transporter
NMDA
N-methyl-D-aspartate
NOR
novel object recognition
Npas4
neuronal PAS domain protein 4
Nptx2
neuronal pentraxin-2 protein
PCP
phencyclidine
PD
Parkinson disease
PD-D
PD dementia
PFC
prefrontal cortex
RL
reversal learning
scPCP
subchronic PCP
  • Copyright © 2020 The Author(s).

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY Attribution 4.0 International license.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Aarsland D,
    2. Brønnick K,
    3. Larsen JP,
    4. Tysnes OB,
    5. Alves G, and Norwegian ParkWest Study Group
    (2009) Cognitive impairment in incident, untreated Parkinson disease: the Norwegian ParkWest study. Neurology 72:1121–1126.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Abdul-Monim Z,
    2. Reynolds GP, and
    3. Neill JC
    (2006) The effect of atypical and classical antipsychotics on sub-chronic PCP-induced cognitive deficits in a reversal-learning paradigm. Behav Brain Res 169:263–273.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Arnsten AF
    (1998) Catecholamine modulation of prefrontal cortical cognitive function. Trends Cogn Sci 2:436–447.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Arnsten AF
    (2011) Catecholamine influences on dorsolateral prefrontal cortical networks. Biol Psychiatry 69:e89–e99.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Banerjee PS,
    2. Aston J,
    3. Khundakar AA, and
    4. Zetterström TS
    (2009) Differential regulation of psychostimulant-induced gene expression of brain derived neurotrophic factor and the immediate-early gene Arc in the juvenile and adult brain. Eur J Neurosci 29:465–476.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Beeler JA,
    2. Petzinger G, and
    3. Jakowec MW
    (2013) The enemy within: propagation of aberrant corticostriatal learning to cortical function in Parkinson’s disease. Front Neurol 4:134.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Berridge CW,
    2. Devilbiss DM,
    3. Andrzejewski ME,
    4. Arnsten AF,
    5. Kelley AE,
    6. Schmeichel B,
    7. Hamilton C, and
    8. Spencer RC
    (2006) Methylphenidate preferentially increases catecholamine neurotransmission within the prefrontal cortex at low doses that enhance cognitive function. Biol Psychiatry 60:1111–1120.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Blattner KM,
    2. Canney DJ,
    3. Pippin DA, and
    4. Blass BE
    (2019) Pharmacology and therapeutic potential of the 5-HT7 receptor. ACS Chem Neurosci 10:89–119.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Bohnen NI,
    2. Kaufer DI,
    3. Ivanco LS,
    4. Lopresti B,
    5. Koeppe RA,
    6. Davis JG,
    7. Mathis CA,
    8. Moore RY, and
    9. DeKosky ST
    (2003) Cortical cholinergic function is more severely affected in parkinsonian dementia than in Alzheimer disease: an in vivo positron emission tomographic study. Arch Neurol 60:1745–1748.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Bondi CO,
    2. Jett JD, and
    3. Morilak DA
    (2010) Beneficial effects of desipramine on cognitive function of chronically stressed rats are mediated by alpha1-adrenergic receptors in medial prefrontal cortex. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 34:913–923.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Borthwick AD
    (2017) Fluparoxan: a comprehensive review of its discovery, adrenergic and CNS activity and treatment of cognitive dysfunction in central neurodegenerative diseases. Mini Rev Med Chem 17:572–582.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Bramham CR,
    2. Alme MN,
    3. Bittins M,
    4. Kuipers SD,
    5. Nair RR,
    6. Pai B,
    7. Panja D,
    8. Schubert M,
    9. Soule J,
    10. Tiron A, et al.
    (2010) The Arc of synaptic memory. Exp Brain Res 200:125–140.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Bymaster FP,
    2. Katner JS,
    3. Nelson DL,
    4. Hemrick-Luecke SK,
    5. Threlkeld PG,
    6. Heiligenstein JH,
    7. Morin SM,
    8. Gehlert DR, and
    9. Perry KW
    (2002) Atomoxetine increases extracellular levels of norepinephrine and dopamine in prefrontal cortex of rat: a potential mechanism for efficacy in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 27:699–711.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Cadinu D,
    2. Grayson B,
    3. Podda G,
    4. Harte MK,
    5. Doostdar N, and
    6. Neill JC
    (2018) NMDA receptor antagonist rodent models for cognition in schizophrenia and identification of novel drug treatments, an update. Neuropharmacology 142:41–62.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Cain RE,
    2. Wasserman MC,
    3. Waterhouse BD, and
    4. McGaughy JA
    (2011) Atomoxetine facilitates attentional set shifting in adolescent rats. Dev Cogn Neurosci 1:552–559.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Chaudhuri KR,
    2. Sauerbier A,
    3. Rojo JM,
    4. Sethi K,
    5. Schapira AH,
    6. Brown RG,
    7. Antonini A,
    8. Stocchi F,
    9. Odin P,
    10. Bhattacharya K, et al.
    (2015) The burden of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease using a self-completed non-motor questionnaire: a simple grading system. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 21:287–291.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Coull JT,
    2. Sahakian BJ, and
    3. Hodges JR
    (1996) The alpha(2) antagonist idazoxan remediates certain attentional and executive dysfunction in patients with dementia of frontal type. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 123:239–249.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Csermely P,
    2. Agoston V, and
    3. Pongor S
    (2005) The efficiency of multi-target drugs: the network approach might help drug design. Trends Pharmacol Sci 26:178–182.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. de Lau LM,
    2. Verbaan D,
    3. Marinus J, and
    4. van Hilten JJ
    (2014) Survival in Parkinson’s disease. Relation with motor and non-motor features. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 20:613–616.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Devauges V and
    2. Sara SJ
    (1990) Activation of the noradrenergic system facilitates an attentional shift in the rat. Behav Brain Res 39:19–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Devoto P,
    2. Flore G,
    3. Vacca G,
    4. Pira L,
    5. Arca A,
    6. Casu MA,
    7. Pani L, and
    8. Gessa GL
    (2003) Co-release of noradrenaline and dopamine from noradrenergic neurons in the cerebral cortex induced by clozapine, the prototype atypical antipsychotic. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 167:79–84.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. du Jardin KG,
    2. Jensen JB,
    3. Sanchez C, and
    4. Pehrson AL
    (2014) Vortioxetine dose-dependently reverses 5-HT depletion-induced deficits in spatial working and object recognition memory: a potential role for 5-HT1A receptor agonism and 5-HT3 receptor antagonism. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 24:160–171.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Erdozain AM,
    2. Brocos-Mosquera I,
    3. Gabilondo AM,
    4. Meana JJ, and
    5. Callado LF
    (2019) Differential α2A- and α2C-adrenoceptor protein expression in presynaptic and postsynaptic density fractions of postmortem human prefrontal cortex. J Psychopharmacol 33:244–249.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Gerasimov MR,
    2. Franceschi M,
    3. Volkow ND,
    4. Gifford A,
    5. Gatley SJ,
    6. Marsteller D,
    7. Molina PE, and
    8. Dewey SL
    (2000) Comparison between intraperitoneal and oral methylphenidate administration: a microdialysis and locomotor activity study. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 295:51–57.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Goldman JG and
    2. Holden S
    (2014) Treatment of psychosis and dementia in Parkinson’s disease. Curr Treat Options Neurol 16:281.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Gratwicke J,
    2. Jahanshahi M, and
    3. Foltynie T
    (2015) Parkinson’s disease dementia: a neural networks perspective. Brain 138:1454–1476.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Grayson B,
    2. Idris NF, and
    3. Neill JC
    (2007) Atypical antipsychotics attenuate a sub-chronic PCP-induced cognitive deficit in the novel object recognition task in the rat. Behav Brain Res 184:31–38.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Grimbergen YA,
    2. Langston JW,
    3. Roos RA, and
    4. Bloem BR
    (2009) Postural instability in Parkinson’s disease: the adrenergic hypothesis and the locus coeruleus. Expert Rev Neurother 9:279–290.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Haapalinna A,
    2. Sirviö J, and
    3. Lammintausta R
    (1998) Facilitation of cognitive functions by a specific alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist, atipamezole. Eur J Pharmacol 347:29–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Hely MA,
    2. Reid WG,
    3. Adena MA,
    4. Halliday GM, and
    5. Morris JG
    (2008) The Sydney multicenter study of Parkinson’s disease: the inevitability of dementia at 20 years. Mov Disord 23:837–844.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Hertel P,
    2. Mathé JM,
    3. Nomikos GG,
    4. Iurlo M,
    5. Mathé AA, and
    6. Svensson TH
    (1995) Effects of D-amphetamine and phencyclidine on behavior and extracellular concentrations of neurotensin and dopamine in the ventral striatum and the medial prefrontal cortex of the rat. Behav Brain Res 72:103–114.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Hertel P,
    2. Nomikos GG,
    3. Schilström B,
    4. Arborelius L, and
    5. Svensson TH
    (1997) Risperidone dose-dependently increases extracellular concentrations of serotonin in the rat frontal cortex: role of alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonism. Neuropsychopharmacology 17:44–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Hilker R,
    2. Thomas AV,
    3. Klein JC,
    4. Weisenbach S,
    5. Kalbe E,
    6. Burghaus L,
    7. Jacobs AH,
    8. Herholz K, and
    9. Heiss WD
    (2005) Dementia in Parkinson disease: functional imaging of cholinergic and dopaminergic pathways. Neurology 65:1716–1722.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Huang M,
    2. He W,
    3. Kiss B,
    4. Farkas B,
    5. Adham N, and
    6. Meltzer HY
    (2019) The role of dopamine D3 receptor partial agonism in cariprazine-induced neurotransmitter efflux in rat Hippocampus and nucleus accumbens. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 371:517–525.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Hutson PH,
    2. Clark JA, and
    3. Cross AJ
    (2017) CNS target identification and validation: avoiding the valley of death or naive optimism? Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 57:171–187.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. Ichikawa J,
    2. Dai J,
    3. O’Laughlin IA,
    4. Fowler WL, and
    5. Meltzer HY
    (2002) Atypical, but not typical, antipsychotic drugs increase cortical acetylcholine release without an effect in the nucleus accumbens or striatum. Neuropsychopharmacology 26:325–339.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Jerlhag E,
    2. Janson AC,
    3. Waters S, and
    4. Engel JA
    (2012) Concomitant release of ventral tegmental acetylcholine and accumbal dopamine by ghrelin in rats. PLoS One 7:e49557.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Kauppila T,
    2. Tanila H,
    3. Carlson S, and
    4. Taira T
    (1991) Effects of atipamezole, a novel alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonist, in open-field, plus-maze, two compartment exploratory, and forced swimming tests in the rat. Eur J Pharmacol 205:177–182.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Kehr J,
    2. Yoshitake T,
    3. Ichinose F,
    4. Yoshitake S,
    5. Kiss B,
    6. Gyertyán I, and
    7. Adham N
    (2018) Effects of cariprazine on extracellular levels of glutamate, GABA, dopamine, noradrenaline and serotonin in the medial prefrontal cortex in the rat phencyclidine model of schizophrenia studied by microdialysis and simultaneous recordings of locomotor activity. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 235:1593–1607.
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Kowal SL,
    2. Dall TM,
    3. Chakrabarti R,
    4. Storm MV, and
    5. Jain A
    (2013) The current and projected economic burden of Parkinson’s disease in the United States. Mov Disord 28:311–318.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Lapiz MD and
    2. Morilak DA
    (2006) Noradrenergic modulation of cognitive function in rat medial prefrontal cortex as measured by attentional set shifting capability. Neuroscience 137:1039–1049.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Leroi I,
    2. McDonald K,
    3. Pantula H, and
    4. Harbishettar V
    (2012) Cognitive impairment in Parkinson disease: impact on quality of life, disability, and caregiver burden. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 25:208–214.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Marsteller DA,
    2. Gerasimov MR,
    3. Schiffer WK,
    4. Geiger JM,
    5. Barnett CR,
    6. Schaich Borg J,
    7. Scott S,
    8. Ceccarelli J,
    9. Volkow ND,
    10. Molina PE, et al.
    (2002) Acute handling stress modulates methylphenidate-induced catecholamine overflow in the medial prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology 27:163–170.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Maurice T and
    2. Goguadze N
    (2017) Sigma-1 (σ 1) receptor in memory and neurodegenerative diseases. Handb Exp Pharmacol 244:81–108.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. McLean SL,
    2. Harte MK,
    3. Neill JC, and
    4. Young AM
    (2017) Dopamine dysregulation in the prefrontal cortex relates to cognitive deficits in the sub-chronic PCP-model for schizophrenia: a preliminary investigation. J Psychopharmacol 31:660–666.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. McLean SL,
    2. Idris NF,
    3. Woolley ML, and
    4. Neill JC
    (2009) D(1)-like receptor activation improves PCP-induced cognitive deficits in animal models: implications for mechanisms of improved cognitive function in schizophrenia. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 19:440–450.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Mervaala E,
    2. Alhainen K,
    3. Helkala EL,
    4. Partanen J,
    5. Jousmäki V,
    6. Väyrynen M,
    7. Heinonen E, and
    8. Riekkinen P
    (1993) Electrophysiological and neuropsychological effects of a central alpha 2-antagonist atipamezole in healthy volunteers. Behav Brain Res 55:85–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Millan MJ,
    2. Newman-Tancredi A,
    3. Audinot V,
    4. Cussac D,
    5. Lejeune F,
    6. Nicolas JP,
    7. Cogé F,
    8. Galizzi JP,
    9. Boutin JA,
    10. Rivet JM, et al.
    (2000) Agonist and antagonist actions of yohimbine as compared to fluparoxan at alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors (AR)s, serotonin (5-HT)(1A), 5-HT(1B), 5-HT(1D) and dopamine D(2) and D(3) receptors. Significance for the modulation of frontocortical monoaminergic transmission and depressive states. Synapse 35:79–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Millan MJ,
    2. Rivet JM, and
    3. Gobert A
    (2016) The frontal cortex as a network hub controlling mood and cognition: probing its neurochemical substrates for improved therapy of psychiatric and neurological disorders. J Psychopharmacol 30:1099–1128.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Mojtabai R and
    2. Olfson M
    (2010) National trends in psychotropic medication polypharmacy in office-based psychiatry. Arch Gen Psychiatry 67:26–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Mørk A,
    2. Montezinho LP,
    3. Miller S,
    4. Trippodi-Murphy C,
    5. Plath N,
    6. Li Y,
    7. Gulinello M, and
    8. Sanchez C
    (2013) Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004), a novel multimodal antidepressant, enhances memory in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 105:41–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Moy SS and
    2. Breese GR
    (2002) Phencyclidine supersensitivity in rats with neonatal dopamine loss. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 161:255–262.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Narayanan NS,
    2. Rodnitzky RL, and
    3. Uc EY
    (2013) Prefrontal dopamine signaling and cognitive symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. Rev Neurosci 24:267–278.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Neill JC,
    2. Barnes S,
    3. Cook S,
    4. Grayson B,
    5. Idris NF,
    6. McLean SL,
    7. Snigdha S,
    8. Rajagopal L, and
    9. Harte MK
    (2010) Animal models of cognitive dysfunction and negative symptoms of schizophrenia: focus on NMDA receptor antagonism. Pharmacol Ther 128:419–432.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Neill JC,
    2. Grayson B,
    3. Kiss B,
    4. Gyertyán I,
    5. Ferguson P, and
    6. Adham N
    (2016) Effects of cariprazine, a novel antipsychotic, on cognitive deficit and negative symptoms in a rodent model of schizophrenia symptomatology. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 26:3–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Nguyen L,
    2. Lucke-Wold BP,
    3. Mookerjee SA,
    4. Cavendish JZ,
    5. Robson MJ,
    6. Scandinaro AL, and
    7. Matsumoto RR
    (2015) Role of sigma-1 receptors in neurodegenerative diseases. J Pharmacol Sci 127:17–29.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  57. ↵
    1. Nikiforuk A
    (2015) Targeting the serotonin 5-HT7 receptor in the search for treatments for CNS disorders: rationale and progress to date. CNS Drugs 29:265–275.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  58. ↵
    1. Okuno H
    (2011) Regulation and function of immediate-early genes in the brain: beyond neuronal activity markers. Neurosci Res 69:175–186.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Pantall A,
    2. Suresparan P,
    3. Kapa L,
    4. Morris R,
    5. Yarnall A,
    6. Del Din S, and
    7. Rochester L
    (2018) Postural dynamics are associated with cognitive decline in Parkinson’s disease. Front Neurol 9:1044.
    OpenUrl
  60. ↵
    1. Paxinos G and
    2. Watson C
    (2009) The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, Elsevier Science.
  61. ↵
    1. Pehrson AL,
    2. Cremers T,
    3. Bétry C,
    4. van der Hart MG,
    5. Jørgensen L,
    6. Madsen M,
    7. Haddjeri N,
    8. Ebert B, and
    9. Sanchez C
    (2013) Lu AA21004, a novel multimodal antidepressant, produces regionally selective increases of multiple neurotransmitters--a rat microdialysis and electrophysiology study. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 23:133–145.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Pehrson AL,
    2. Pedersen CS,
    3. Tølbøl KS, and
    4. Sanchez C
    (2018) Vortioxetine treatment reverses subchronic PCP treatment-induced cognitive impairments: a potential role for serotonin receptor-mediated regulation of GABA neurotransmission. Front Pharmacol 9:162.
    OpenUrl
  63. ↵
    1. Peters JU
    (2013) Polypharmacology - foe or friend? J Med Chem 56:8955–8971.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Ponten H,
    2. Kullingsjö J,
    3. Lagerkvist S,
    4. Martin P,
    5. Pettersson F,
    6. Sonesson C,
    7. Waters S, and
    8. Waters N
    (2010) In vivo pharmacology of the dopaminergic stabilizer pridopidine. Eur J Pharmacol 644:88–95.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Robbins MJ,
    2. Critchlow HM,
    3. Lloyd A,
    4. Cilia J,
    5. Clarke JD,
    6. Bond B,
    7. Jones DN, and
    8. Maycox PR
    (2008) Differential expression of IEG mRNA in rat brain following acute treatment with clozapine or haloperidol: a semi-quantitative RT-PCR study. J Psychopharmacol 22:536–542.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Robbins TW and
    2. Arnsten AF
    (2009) The neuropsychopharmacology of fronto-executive function: monoaminergic modulation. Annu Rev Neurosci 32:267–287.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Robbins TW and
    2. Cools R
    (2014) Cognitive deficits in Parkinson’s disease: a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Mov Disord 29:597–607.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Rowley HL,
    2. Kulkarni RS,
    3. Gosden J,
    4. Brammer RJ,
    5. Hackett D, and
    6. Heal DJ
    (2014) Differences in the neurochemical and behavioural profiles of lisdexamfetamine methylphenidate and modafinil revealed by simultaneous dual-probe microdialysis and locomotor activity measurements in freely-moving rats. J Psychopharmacol 28:254–269.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Sauerbier A,
    2. Jenner P,
    3. Todorova A, and
    4. Chaudhuri KR
    (2016) Non motor subtypes and Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 22 (Suppl 1):S41–S46.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. Schirinzi T,
    2. Madeo G,
    3. Martella G,
    4. Maltese M,
    5. Picconi B,
    6. Calabresi P, and
    7. Pisani A
    (2016) Early synaptic dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease: insights from animal models. Mov Disord 31:802–813.
    OpenUrl
  71. ↵
    1. Seppi K,
    2. Weintraub D,
    3. Coelho M,
    4. Perez-Lloret S,
    5. Fox SH,
    6. Katzenschlager R,
    7. Hametner EM,
    8. Poewe W,
    9. Rascol O,
    10. Goetz CG, et al.
    (2011) The movement disorder society evidence-based medicine review update: treatments for the non-motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 26 (Suppl 3):S42–S80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. Seu E and
    2. Jentsch JD
    (2009) Effect of acute and repeated treatment with desipramine or methylphenidate on serial reversal learning in rats. Neuropharmacology 57:665–672.
    OpenUrl
  73. ↵
    1. Shepherd GM
    (2013) Corticostriatal connectivity and its role in disease. Nat Rev Neurosci 14:278–291.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Shilliam CS and
    2. Dawson LA
    (2005) The effect of clozapine on extracellular dopamine levels in the shell subregion of the rat nucleus accumbens is reversed following chronic administration: comparison with a selective 5-HT(2C) receptor antagonist. Neuropsychopharmacology 30:372–380.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Shirazi-Southall S,
    2. Rodriguez DE, and
    3. Nomikos GG
    (2002) Effects of typical and atypical antipsychotics and receptor selective compounds on acetylcholine efflux in the hippocampus of the rat. Neuropsychopharmacology 26:583–594.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. ↵
    1. Snigdha S,
    2. Horiguchi M,
    3. Huang M,
    4. Li Z,
    5. Shahid M,
    6. Neill JC, and
    7. Meltzer HY
    (2010) Attenuation of phencyclidine-induced object recognition deficits by the combination of atypical antipsychotic drugs and pimavanserin (ACP 103), a 5-hydroxytryptamine(2A) receptor inverse agonist. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 332:622–631.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  77. ↵
    1. Sun X and
    2. Lin Y
    (2016) Npas4: linking neuronal activity to memory. Trends Neurosci 39:264–275.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Sutcliffe JS,
    2. Marshall KM, and
    3. Neill JC
    (2007) Influence of gender on working and spatial memory in the novel object recognition task in the rat. Behav Brain Res 177:117–125.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Svenningsson Per,
    2. Odin Per,
    3. Dizdar Nil,
    4. Johansson Anders,
    5. Grigoriou Sotirios,
    6. Tsitsi Panagiota,
    7. Wictorin Klas,
    8. Bergquist Filip,
    9. Nyholm Dag,
    10. Rinne Juha, et al., and IRL752 Collaborators
    (2020) A Phase 2a Trial Investigating the Safety and Tolerability of the Novel Cortical Enhancer IRL752 in Parkinson’s Disease Dementia. Mov Disord 35 (6):1046–1054, doi: 10.1002/mds.28020 pmid:32198802.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Swanson CJ,
    2. Perry KW,
    3. Koch-Krueger S,
    4. Katner J,
    5. Svensson KA, and
    6. Bymaster FP
    (2006) Effect of the attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder drug atomoxetine on extracellular concentrations of norepinephrine and dopamine in several brain regions of the rat. Neuropharmacology 50:755–760.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. ↵
    1. Szeto JY and
    2. Lewis SJ
    (2016) Current treatment options for Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease dementia. Curr Neuropharmacol 14:326–338.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  82. ↵
    1. Taylor J-P,
    2. Rowan E N,
    3. Lett D,
    4. O’Brien J T,
    5. McKeith I G, and
    6. Burn D J
    (2008) Poor attentional function predicts cognitive decline in patients with non-demented Parkinson’s disease independent of motor phenotype. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79 (12):1318–1323, doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2008.147629 pmid:18586866.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  83. ↵
    1. Tellez S,
    2. Colpaert F, and
    3. Marien M
    (1999) Alpha2-adrenoceptor modulation of cortical acetylcholine release in vivo. Neuroscience 89:1041–1050.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  84. ↵
    1. Tun K,
    2. Menghini M,
    3. D’Andrea L,
    4. Dhar P,
    5. Tanaka H, and
    6. Giuliani A
    (2011) Why so few drug targets: a mathematical explanation? Curr Comput Aided Drug Des 7:206–213.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  85. ↵
    1. Tzavara ET,
    2. Bymaster FP,
    3. Overshiner CD,
    4. Davis RJ,
    5. Perry KW,
    6. Wolff M,
    7. McKinzie DL,
    8. Witkin JM, and
    9. Nomikos GG
    (2006) Procholinergic and memory enhancing properties of the selective norepinephrine uptake inhibitor atomoxetine. Mol Psychiatry 11:187–195.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. ↵
    1. Uys MM,
    2. Shahid M, and
    3. Harvey BH
    (2017a) Therapeutic potential of selectively targeting the α 2C-adrenoceptor in cognition, depression, and schizophrenia-new developments and future perspective. Front Psychiatry 8:144.
    OpenUrl
  87. ↵
    1. Uys MM,
    2. Shahid M,
    3. Sallinen J, and
    4. Harvey BH
    (2017b) The α2C-adrenoceptor antagonist, ORM-10921, exerts antidepressant-like effects in the Flinders Sensitive Line rat. Behav Pharmacol 28:9–18.
    OpenUrl
  88. ↵
    1. Vossius C,
    2. Larsen JP,
    3. Janvin C, and
    4. Aarsland D
    (2011) The economic impact of cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 26:1541–1544.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  89. ↵
    1. Wallace A,
    2. Pehrson AL,
    3. Sánchez C, and
    4. Morilak DA
    (2014) Vortioxetine restores reversal learning impaired by 5-HT depletion or chronic intermittent cold stress in rats. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 17:1695–1706.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. ↵
    1. Waters N,
    2. Lagerkvist S,
    3. Löfberg L,
    4. Piercey M, and
    5. Carlsson A
    (1993) The dopamine D3 receptor and autoreceptor preferring antagonists (+)-AJ76 and (+)-UH232; a microdialysis study. Eur J Pharmacol 242:151–163.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  91. ↵
    1. Waters S,
    2. Sonesson C,
    3. Svensson P,
    4. Tedroff J,
    5. Carta M,
    6. Ljung E,
    7. Gunnergren J,
    8. Edling M,
    9. Svanberg B,
    10. Fagerberg A, et al.
    (2020) Preclinical pharmacology of [2-(3-Fluoro-5-Methanesulfonyl-phenoxy)Ethyl](Propyl)amine (IRL790), a novel dopamine transmission modulator for the treatment of motor and psychiatric complications in Parkinson disease. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 374:113–125.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  92. ↵
    1. Waters S,
    2. Svensson P,
    3. Kullingsjö J,
    4. Pontén H,
    5. Andreasson T,
    6. Sunesson Y,
    7. Ljung E,
    8. Sonesson C, and
    9. Waters N
    (2017) In vivo systems response profiling and multivariate classification of CNS active compounds: a structured tool for CNS drug discovery. ACS Chem Neurosci 8:785–797.
    OpenUrl
  93. ↵
    1. Weintraub D and
    2. Burn DJ
    (2011) Parkinson’s disease: the quintessential neuropsychiatric disorder. Mov Disord 26:1022–1031.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  94. ↵
    1. Wesołowska A and
    2. Kowalska M
    (2008) Influence of serotonin 5-HT(7) receptor blockade on the behavioral and neurochemical effects of imipramine in rats. Pharmacol Rep 60:464–474.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  95. ↵
    1. Westerink BH,
    2. Kawahara Y,
    3. De Boer P,
    4. Geels C,
    5. De Vries JB,
    6. Wikström HV,
    7. Van Kalkeren A,
    8. Van Vliet B,
    9. Kruse CG, and
    10. Long SK
    (2001) Antipsychotic drugs classified by their effects on the release of dopamine and noradrenaline in the prefrontal cortex and striatum. Eur J Pharmacol 412:127–138.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  96. ↵
    1. Willis AW,
    2. Schootman M,
    3. Kung N,
    4. Evanoff BA,
    5. Perlmutter JS, and
    6. Racette BA
    (2012) Predictors of survival in patients with Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol 69:601–607.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  97. ↵
    1. Zaborszky L,
    2. Rosin DL, and
    3. Kiss J
    (2004) Alpha-adrenergic receptor (alpha(2 A )) is colocalized in basal forebrain cholinergic neurons: a light and electron microscopic double immunolabeling study. J Neurocytol 33:265–276.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics: 374 (3)
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Vol. 374, Issue 3
1 Sep 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
(3S)‐3‐(2,3‐difluorophenyl)‐3‐methoxypyrrolidine (IRL752) —a Novel Cortical-Preferring Catecholamine Transmission- and Cognition-Promoting Agent
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleDrug Discovery and Translational Medicine

IRL752—a Cortical-Preferring Cognition-Promoting Agent

S. Hjorth, S. Waters, N. Waters, J. Tedroff, P. Svensson, A. Fagerberg, M. Edling, B. Svanberg, E. Ljung, J. Gunnergren, S.L. McLean, B. Grayson, N.F. Idris, J.C. Neill and C. Sonesson
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics September 1, 2020, 374 (3) 404-419; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.120.000037

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Research ArticleDrug Discovery and Translational Medicine

IRL752—a Cortical-Preferring Cognition-Promoting Agent

S. Hjorth, S. Waters, N. Waters, J. Tedroff, P. Svensson, A. Fagerberg, M. Edling, B. Svanberg, E. Ljung, J. Gunnergren, S.L. McLean, B. Grayson, N.F. Idris, J.C. Neill and C. Sonesson
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics September 1, 2020, 374 (3) 404-419; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.120.000037
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Overview
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Authorship Contributions
    • Footnotes
    • Abbreviations
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Blebbistatin scaffold is ideal for drug development
  • Cx43 Activity and Modulation in the Myometrium
  • IKCa channels in muscle hypertrophy
Show more Drug Discovery and Translational Medicine

Similar Articles

  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About JPET
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-0103 (Online)

Copyright © 2021 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics