Abstract
Glial activation plays a pivotal role in morphine tolerance. This study investigated effects of Mas-related gene (Mrg) C receptor on morphine-induced activation of microglia and astrocytes in the spinal cord and its underlying mechanisms. Intrathecal administration of morphine (20 μg, daily) for 6 days induced a great decline in morphine antinociception and increased expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein and OX-42 in the spinal dorsal horn. These changes were greatly attenuated by the intermittent coinjection of bovine adrenal medulla 8–22 (BAM8-22, 1 nmol), a specific agonist of MrgC receptor. These modulatory effects were accompanied by the reduction of P2X4 and interleukin-1β expressions in the spinal dorsal horn. Chronic morphine increased the expression of fractalkine in medium- and small-sized neurons of dorsal root ganglia (DRG). Treatment with BAM8-22 inhibited these changes as well as an increase in Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) protein in DRG. Chronic treatment of DRG explant cultures with morphine (3.3 μM, 5 days) increased the levels of fractalkine mRNA. Application of BAM8-22 (10 nM) for 60 minutes completely blocked the increase of fractalkine mRNA induced by morphine. Our findings indicate that the inhibition of morphine tolerance by MrgC receptor was associated with the modulation of astrocytes and microglia in the spinal dorsal horn and fractalkine and TLR4 expressions in DRG. As MrgC receptor is exclusively located in DRG, intermittent combination of MrgC receptor agonist could be a promising adjunct with limited side effects for chronic use of opiates.
Introduction
The repeated administration of opioids results in the development of tolerance and hyperalgesia, limiting opioid efficacy in the clinical treatment of pain. There is growing evidence that spinal cord microglia and astrocytes play a central role in the development and maintenance of morphine (prototypical opioid) tolerance (Watkins et al., 2009). Astrocytes and microglia are in close contact with neuronal somas in the spinal dorsal horn (Haydon, 2001) and express many functional molecules (Porter and McCarthy, 1997; Pocock and Kettenmann, 2007). Following chronic exposure to morphine, spinal glial cells are activated, which manifests as cell hypertrophy, retraction of processes, an increase in the cell density, and expression of OX-42 (Raghavendra et al., 2002) or glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (Tawfik et al., 2005). Activated microglia and astrocytes display functional changes. It has been shown that purinergic P2X4 receptor (Horvath et al., 2010) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) (Johnston et al., 2004) are upregulated in spinal glial cells following repeated morphine administration. P2X4 receptor activates microglia and astrocytes (Horvath et al., 2010), promotes microglial chemotaxis (Ohsawa et al., 2007), and induces microglial phenotypic changes (Horvath et al., 2010). IL-1β is a proinflammatory cytokine and can induce the production of a variety of neuroexcitants, such as ATP (Sperlágh et al., 2004), nitric oxide, and prostaglandins (Samad et al., 2001). All these changes increase excitation of spinal dorsal horn neurons (Hutchinson et al., 2011). Thus pain states are enhanced (Watkins et al., 2001) and morphine analgesia declines (Watkins et al., 2005). Inhibition of gliosis (Mika et al., 2009) or blockade of P2X4 (Horvath et al., 2010) or IL-1β receptor signaling (Johnston et al., 2004) can normalize glial functions, restoring morphine analgesia.
It is not known whether activation of Mas-related gene (Mrg) receptor could inhibit morphine induced-spinal glial reactivity and functional changes. Mrg receptor is a large family of G protein-coupled receptors (Dong et al., 2001). Seven subtypes of Mrg receptor (X1–X7) have been identified in humans (Dong et al., 2001; Choi and Lahn, 2003) and eight subtypes of Mrg receptor (A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H) are found in rodents (Zylka et al., 2003). Rat MrgC receptor shares partial homogeneity with human MrgX1 receptor. Both receptors are uniquely expressed in small-diameter neurons of dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and trigeminal ganglia (Dong et al., 2001; Lembo et al., 2002). It is of clinical interest to study the function and characterization of rat MrgC receptor. It has been demonstrated that activation of MrgC receptor protects against (Liu et al., 2009; He et al., 2014a) and inhibits (Jiang et al., 2013; He et al., 2014b) pain hypersensitivity induced by nerve injury and inflammation in the periphery. However, MrgC receptor does not play a role in pain processing in the normal condition, as evidenced by the studies showing that intrathecal (i.t.) administration of bovine adrenal medulla 8-22 (BAM8-22) in rats (Cai et al., 2007; Chen et al., 2010) and mice (Guan et al., 2010) does not change pain sensitivity. BAM8-22 is an analog of the endogenous opioid peptide BAM22 (Lembo et al., 2002), a cleavage product of proenkephalin A (precursor of Leu- and Met-enkephalin) in the adrenal medulla (Davis et al., 1990). However, BAM8-22 does not activate opioid receptors and displays high affinity with MrgC receptor (Lembo et al., 2002). It is a highly specific MrgC receptor agonist, as evidenced by the findings that BAM8-22 loses its bioaction following MrgC gene depletion (Guan et al., 2010) or receptor neutralization (Wang et al., 2016). We have observed that intrathecal administration of BAM8–22 prevents or inhibits morphine tolerance (Cai et al., 2007; Chen et al., 2010) and enhances morphine analgesia (Wang et al., 2013). The mechanisms underlying these effects involve inhibition of expression of pro-nociceptive mediators and signaling transduction pathways in neurons of spinal dorsal horn and/or DRG (Chen et al., 2010; Huang et al., 2014) and also the increase in coupling of μ-opioid receptor (MOR) with inhibitory guanine nucleotide binding regulatory protein (Gi protein) (Wang et al., 2013). The present study investigated the effects of MrgC receptor on chronic morphine-induced spinal glial activation and its possible mechanisms.
Materials and Methods
Animals.
Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 230–290 g were obtained from the Animal Center of Fujian Medical University (Fujian, China) and housed in a room maintained at 22°C ± 0.5°C with an alternating 12-hour light-dark cycle (lights off at 0700 hours and on at 1900 hours). Animals had free access to food and water adding libitum. The study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines for investigations of experimental pain in conscious animals (Zimmermann, 1983) approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Experimentation of Fujian Normal University. Following implantation of intrathecal catheter, rats were housed individually. Behavioral assessments were performed between 0830 and 1630 hours. Efforts were made to reduce the number of animals used.
Implantation of Intrathecal Catheter.
Rats were implanted with indwelling catheters in the intrathecal space. Briefly, animals were injected with pentobarbital (50 mg/kg, i.p.; Shenggong, Shanghai, China). The dura mater overlying the atlanto-occipital membrane of rats was exposed and a small slit was cut in the membrane. A PE-10 tubing (Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL) was inserted into the intrathecal space with its tip being positioned at the level of lumbar enlargement (L4–L5). The catheter was flushed with saline (10 μl) and closed. The rats then were allowed to recover for 1 week. The location of intrathecal catheter tip was confirmed by intrathecal injection of lidocaine (200 μg/10 μl; Shenggong), which caused a motor paralysis of the lower limbs. Vehicle (saline) or drug was administered intrathecally in a volume of 10 μl under conscious condition.
Rats were made tolerant to the anesthetic action of morphine. Morphine hydrochloride (20 μg, i.t.; Northeast, Shenyang, Liaoning, China) was injected daily to rat for 6 days to induce tolerance to morphine. BAM8-22 (1 nmol, i.t.; Huadatianyuan, Shanghai, China) or saline was given on days 1, 3, and 5. Morphine or BAM8-22 was dissolved or diluted in saline.
Nociceptive Test.
A behavior test evaluated response to heat stimulation in the tail and thereby the effect of drugs on nociceptive sensitivity in rats. Tail flick latency (TFL) was measured using a Tail Flick Meter (IITC Life Science Inc., Woodland Hills, CA). The animals were acclimatized to the environment (behavior testing) for 30–40 min for five days and also habituated for 15 min prior to testing to minimize individual variability of behavioral tests. A light source was directed at the underside of their tail and the latency to remove the tail was recorded. The baseline latency was approximately 2–3.2 seconds and the cut-off latency was set to 10 seconds to avoid tissue injury. Three measurements of TFL were made at each time point and the averaged value was taken. The investigator was blind to the drug test conditions. Responses were expressed as percentage of maximum possible effect (% MPE) of drug or vehicle was analyzed:

Ganglion Explant Cultures.
Rats were sacrificed through decapitation after being anesthetized with pentobarbital. All DRG (C2–L6) were collected under sterile technique. The ganglion explants were washed twice with Hanks’ solution and transferred to Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with streptomycin/penicillin and fetal bovine serum (10%). The DRG explants were incubated in DMEM with a humidified 5% CO2/95% air at 37°C. Twenty-four hours later, DMEM medium was replaced and the cultures were exposed to saline or drugs for various time. The DRG explants were then harvested and stored at −80°C.
Immunohistochemistry.
Animals were injected with pentobarbital (55 mg/kg i.p.) and perfused transcardially with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (0.01 M) followed by cold 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffer (0.1 M). Lumbar segments of the spinal cord (L4–L5) and DRG at L4–L6 were isolated and fixed for 8 hours in 4% paraformaldehyde. Tissues were then cryoprotected with sucrose (30% in PBS). Frozen sections (30 or 10 μm) were prepared from the spinal cord or DRG. The spinal cord or DRG sections were preincubated with PBS containing H2O2 (0.3%) and normal goat serum (10%) for 1 hour. These sections were incubated with a rabbit anti-GFAP [G9269 (Serrano-Pozo et al., 2010; Piccin and Morshead, 2011), 1:2000; Sigma-Aldrich (Shanghai), Shanghai, China], mouse anti-OX-42 [sc-53086 (Shi et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2016), 1:1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Shanghai, China], rabbit anti- P2X4 [ab82329 (Garcia-Guzman et al., 1997; Wu et al., 2011), 1:200; Abcam, Shanghai, China], or goat anti-fractalkine [sc-7225 (Huang et al., 2006; Tsubota et al., 2009), 1:50; Santa Cruz] antibody overnight at 4°C. The sections were washed four times for 5 minutes each in PBS, followed by incubation with a Texas Red rhodamine-conjugated (l:1000; Abcam) or fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC, 1:500 or 1:100; Abcam) secondary antibody (anti-rabbit, anti-mouse, or anti-goat) for 2 hours. After being thoroughly rinsed with PBS, the sections were dehydrated, air dried, and cover-slipped. The specificity of the antibodies for GFAP, OX-42, P2X4, and fractalkine was confirmed by the absence of staining of the tissue sections in experiments without the primary antibodies (n = 2, each). The sections were examined under a fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). GFAP, OX-42, or P2X4 staining were quantified as the number of pixels above a preset intensity threshold by image software (Image-Pro Plus 6.0, Silver Spring, MD), as described in previous study (Hong et al., 2010). Staining intensity of GFAP, OX-42, or P2X4 was examined in the field of 100 × 100 μm from each of seven spinal dorsal horn sections per rat. An increase in pixel numbers was believed to indicate glial reactivity (Alkaitis et al., 2010; Horvath et al., 2010). Fractalkine-positive and negative DRG neurons were quantified using image software in an area of 200 × 200 μm from each of seven DRG sections per rat. The value of positive cells was expressed as a percentage of positive neurons plus negative neurons (total neurons). Experimenter was blinded to experimental conditions.
Western Blot.
DRG explants were homogenized in cell lysis buffer (P0013D; Beyotime, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China). Proteins in the samples were quantified by BCA protein assay kit (Pierce Chemical, Shanghai, China). Proteins (20 μg each) were run on SDS gel (7.5%) and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride filters. The filters were blocked in PBS containing 7% milk. Membranes were incubated with a primary antibody against IL-1β [ab9787 (Maddahi and Edvinsson, 2010; Gui et al., 2012), 1:500; Abcam], Toll-like receptor 4 [TLR4; sc-30002 (Gay and Keith, 1991; Medzhitov et al., 1997), 1:200; Santa Cruz], or β-actin (1:5000; Proteintech, Wuhan, Hubei, China). Blots were incubated with goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (1:10000; LI-COR Biosciences, Shanghai, China) or goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (1:10000; LI-COR) or for 2 hours at room temperature. The band density of target proteins was measured with an imaging analysis software (Odyssey; LI-COR) and normalized against a loading control (β-actin). Results are expressed as a fold change over the saline-treated control.
Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction.
RNA was extracted from the dorsal part of the spinal cord or DRG explants using the RNAprep Kit (Tiangen Bio-Tech, Beijing, China). DNA contamination was removed using deoxyribonuclease I. RNA concentrations were determined by measuring the absorbency at 260 and 280 nm with a UV spectrophotometer. Absorbency ratios of all samples were 1.8–2.0. One microgram of RNA was reversely transcripted into cDNA using Quantscript Reverse Transcription Kit (Tiangen).
The primer sequences of fractalkine and GAPDH were designed using software. The forward/reverse primers were:
5′-GAGCCTCAGAGCACTGGAATT-3′/5′-GTGGACGCTTGAGTAGATAGGG-3′ for fractalkine and
5′-GGCAAGTTCAACGGCACAG-3′/5′-CGCCAGTAGACTCCACGACAT-3′ for GAPDH.
Twenty nanograms of cDNA from the same cDNA batch was subjected to real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to amplify all genes in a total reaction volume of 20 μl, using SYBR Premix Ex Taq, ROX as internal reference dye (Takara Biotech, Dalian, China), and the forward and reverse primers. Reactions were conducted on a 7500 Fast Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems/Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The thermal cycle conditions were: 30 seconds at 95°C, 40 cycles (5 seconds) at 95°C, and 30 seconds at 60°C. All samples were tested in triplicate. A nontemplate reaction served as an negative control. Melting curve analysis of products as well as amplicon size verification on a 3% agarose gel confirmed the specificity of the PCR. The raw expression level of gene was calculated using the same external standard curve made with a mixture of cDNA samples. The expression of fractalkine gene was normalized to that of GAPDH gene control.
Statistical Analysis.
All results are given as mean ± S.E.M. Differences between groups were determined by one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s method. The criterion for statistical significance was P < 0.05.
Results
Intermittent Treatment with BAM8-22 Prevents Development of Morphine Tolerance.
As illustrated in Fig. 1, morphine-induced analgesia declined progressively following the 6-day morphine treatment (20 μg, i.t., daily). Antinociceptive tolerance was indicated by the low %MPE on day 6, which was significantly different from the value on day 1 (P < 0.05). However, when BAM8-22 (1 nmol) was coadministered on days 1, 3, and 5 (defined as intermittent administration), morphine maintained proficiency to induce antinociception throughout the experiment. A one-nanomole dose of BAM8-22 was chosen on the basis of dose-response studies (Cai et al., 2007; Chen et al., 2010). Administration of saline on days 1–6 or BAM8-22 (1 nmol) on days 1, 3, and 5 induced 1%–4% MPE. These values were not significantly different from the preadministration baselines (P > 0.05). These results are consistent with our previous observations (Cai et al., 2007; Chen et al., 2010) and validated the protocols that were used for immunocytochemical staining and Western blot assay in the present study.
Effect of BAM8-22 on the development of morphine tolerance. Morphine (20 μg) or saline was administered intrathecally once per day for 6 days. BAM8-22 (1 nmol) was given with morphine or alone on days 1, 3, and 5. The data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. *P < 0.05 compared with morphine group. #P < 0.05 compared with the value on day 1. N = 6–8.
Intermittent Treatment with BAM8-22 Inhibits Morphine-Induced Activation of Spinal Astrocytes and Microglia.
Morphine (20 μg), morphine plus BAM8-22 (1 nmol, intermittently), or saline were injected intrathecally for 6 days. The lumbar spinal cord was harvested on day 6. Immunocytochemistry assay showed that chronic treatment with morphine remarkably changed the morphology of astrocytes, manifesting an enlargement of GFAP-staining cells and processes and an increase in fluorescence intensity (P < 0.05, Fig. 2, B and E) compared with the saline treatment (Fig. 2, A, D, and G). Following intermittent BAM8-22 administration, morphine-induced astrocytes were remarkably reduced (Fig. 2, C and F) and fluorescence intensity of GFAP in this group was not significantly different from the saline group (P > 0.05, Fig. 2G). GFAP-stained fluorescence intensity in the morphine/BAM8-22 group was significantly lower than the morphine group (P < 0.05, Fig. 2G).
GFAP immunofluorescence staining in the spinal dorsal horn. Saline (A and D), morphine (20 μg) (B and E), or morphine + BAM8-22 (1 nmol, on days 1, 3, and 5) (C and F) were given intrathecally once per day for 6 days. The lumbar spinal cord was harvested on day 6 and processed with immunofluorescence staining. The GFAP staining intensity was quantified as pixels (G). *P < 0.05 compared with saline group. #P < 0.05 compared with morphine group. Scale bar, 200 μm (A–C) or 50 μm (D–F). N = 6.
Following chronic morphine treatment, microglia showed typical amoeboid change. OX-42 immunoreactivity was significantly increased (P < 0.05, Fig. 3, B and D) compared with the saline treatment (Fig. 3, A and D). Intermittent administration of BAM8-22 remarkably attenuated the morphological changes of microglia. The OX-42-stained fluorescence intensity was significantly lower than the morphine group (P < 0.05, Fig. 3, C and D). There was no significant difference between the morphine/BAM8-22 and saline groups for the expression of OX-42 (P > 0.05, Fig. 3D).
OX-42 immunofluorescence staining in the spinal dorsal horn. Saline (A), morphine (20 μg) (B), or morphine + BAM8-22 (1 nmol, on days 1, 3, and 5) (C) were given intrathecally once per day for 6 days. The lumbar spinal cord was harvested on day 6 and processed with immunofluorescence staining. The OX-42 staining intensity was quantified as pixels (D). *P < 0.05 compared with saline group. #P < 0.05 compared with morphine group. Scale bar, 100 μm. N = 6.
Intermittent Treatment with BAM8-22 Attenuates Morphine-Induced Expression of P2X4 and IL-1β in Spinal Cord.
Morphine (20 μg), morphine plus BAM8-22 (1 nmol, intermittently), or saline were injected intrathecally for 6 days. The lumbar spinal cord or the dorsal half of the lumbar spinal cord was harvested on day 6 and assayed by immunocytochemistry staining or Western blot. Chronic morphine delivery significantly increased the protein expression of P2X4 receptor on day 6 (Fig. 4B) compared with the group receiving saline injection (P < 0.05, Fig. 4A). Intermittent administration of BAM8-22 reduced morphine-induced P2X4 immunofluorescence to a level that was significantly lower than the morphine group (P < 0.05, Fig. 4, C and D) but still higher than the saline group (P < 0.05).
P2X4 immunofluorescence staining in the spinal dorsal horn. Saline (A), morphine (20 μg) (B), or morphine + BAM8-22 (1 nmol, on days 1, 3, and 5) (C) were given intrathecally once per day for 6 days. The lumbar spinal cord was harvested on day 6 and processed with immunofluorescence staining. The P2X4 staining intensity was quantified as pixels (D). *P < 0.05 compared with saline group. #P < 0.05 compared with morphine group. Scale bar, 100 μm. N = 6.
Chronic morphine exposure significantly increased the expression of IL-1β protein in the spinal dorsal horn on day 6 (Fig. 5) compared with the saline treatment (P < 0.05). However, morphine failed to change the level of IL-1β expression following the intermittent cotreatment with BAM8-22. Statistical examination indicated that IL-1β expression in the morphine/BAM8-22 group was not significantly different from the saline group (P > 0.05, Fig. 5) and significantly lower than the morphine group (P < 0.05, Fig. 5).
Expression of IL-1β in the spinal dorsal horn. Saline, morphine (20 μg), or morphine + BAM8-22 (1 nmol, on days 1, 3, and 5) were given intrathecally once per day for 6 days. The lumbar spinal cord was harvested on day 6 and processed with Western blot assay. Histograms indicate the percentage of density of IL-1β protein immunobands over β-actin bands. Data for individual IL-1β band were corrected by normalizing it to corresponding loading control. *P < 0.05 compared with control, #P < 0.05 compared with morphine group. N = 5 each.
Intermittent Treatment with BAM8-22 Reduces Morphine-Induced Expression of TLR4 and Fractalkine in DRG In Vivo.
The experimental protocol was identical to above studies. DRG at L4–L6 were harvested on day 6. Figure 6 shows that the chronic exposure of morphine caused an increase in the level of TLR4 protein, which was significantly higher than that in the saline group (P < 0.05). However, morphine induced less TLR4 expression following the intermittent coadministration of BAM8-22, as the level of TLR4 was greatly lower than in the morphine group (P < 0.05) but not significantly different from the saline group (P < 0.05).
Expression of TLR4 in DRG. Saline, morphine (20 μg), or morphine (20 μg) + BAM8-22 (1 nmol, on days 1, 3, and 5) were given intrathecally once per day for 6 days. DRG at L4–6 were harvested on day 6 and processed with Western blot assay. Histograms indicate the percentage of density of TLR4 immunobands over β-actin bands. Data for individual TLR4 bands were corrected by normalizing it to corresponding loading control. *P < 0.05 compared with control, #P < 0.05 compared with morphine group. N = 5 each.
Fractalkine immunofluorescence was found in medium- and small-sized neurons in DRG of saline-treated rats (Fig. 7A). Chronic morphine exposure remarkably increased the expression of fractalkine in both sizes of neurons (P < 0.05, Fig. 7, B and D). Following intermittent treatment with BAM8-22, the numbers of morphine-induced fractalkine neurons in medium and small subpopulations were greatly reduced. The reduction was statistically significant compared with the morphine group (P < 0.05, Fig. 7, C and D). There was no significant difference between the morphine/BAM8-22 and saline groups for the expression of fractalkine in medium and small subpopulations of neurons (P > 0.05, Fig. 7D).
Expression of fractalkine in DRG in vivo. Saline (A), morphine (20 μg) (B), or morphine (20 μg) + BAM8-22 (1 nmol, on days 1, 3, and 5) (C) were given intrathecally once per day for 6 days. DRG at L4–L6 were harvested on day 6 and processed with immunofluorescence staining. Histograms (mean ± S.E.M.) (D) show the proportion of fractalkine-positive neurons over the total correspondingly sized subpopulations of DRG. *P < 0.05 compared with saline group, #P < 0.05 compared with morphine group. Scale bar, 100 μm. N = 5 each.
BAM8-22 Reduces Chronic Morphine-Induced Expression of Fractalkine in DRG Ex Vivo.
DRG explant cultures were exposed to morphine (3.3 μM) or saline for 5 days. On day 5, BAM8-22 (10 nM) or saline were applied to the cultures for 60 minutes and then the DRG were harvested. Total mRNA from cultured DRG was isolated and the levels of fractalkine mRNA were evaluated. GAPDH mRNA was assayed as an internal standard. Fractalkine mRNA was detected in saline-treated DRG. The 5-day treatment with morphine greatly increased the level of fractalkine mRNA (P < 0.05 vs. saline control, Fig. 8). However, the morphine treatment failed to increase fractalkine mRNA following the application of BAM8-22. Statistical analysis indicates that the level of fractalkine mRNA in the morphine/BAM8-22 group was remarkably lower than the morphine group (P < 0.05) but not significantly different from the saline group (P > 0.05).
Expression of fractalkine mRNA in DRG ex vivo. DRG explants were cocultured with saline or morphine (3.3 μM) for 5 days. On day 5, BAM8-22 (10 nM) or saline was applied to the cultures for 60 minutes and then the DRG were harvested. mRNA levels of fractalkine mRNA were assayed. *P < 0.05 compared with saline group, #P < 0.05 compared with morphine group. N = 4 each.
Discussion
The current study demonstrated that intermittent treatment with BAM8-22, a specific MrgC receptor agonist, did not change tail flick latency, confirming that activation of MrgC receptor does not impact pain sensitivity (Cai et al., 2007; Chen et al., 2010; Guan et al., 2010). However, similar treatment with BAM8-22 prevented the development of morphine tolerance. This result accorded with our previous observations (Cai et al., 2007; Chen et al., 2010) and validated the experimental protocols that were used to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the effects of MrgC receptor activation on morphine tolerance in this study.
We first determined the effects of MrgC receptor activation on the morphine-induced morphologic changes of astrocytes and microglia in the spinal cord, since glial activation plays an important role in the development of morphine tolerance (Watkins et al., 2005). Our study showed that following chronic morphine exposure, glial cells became hypertrophic and GFAP/OX-42 immunoreactivity in the spinal dorsal horn was remarkably increased. These changes were in agreement with those reported in previous studies (Raghavendra et al., 2002; Tawfik et al., 2005). Interestingly, the morphologic changes in both astrocytes and microglia were attenuated or inhibited by the intermittent administration of the MrgC receptor agonist BAM8-22. It may be argued that MrgC receptor only modulated microglial activation and the inhibition of astrocytes was the consequence of the microglial deactivation. The basis of this argument was reports that microglia are activated first and in turn lead to the activation of astrocytes in pathologic pain (Tanga et al., 2004) and chronic morphine exposure (Cui et al., 2008). However, there is evidence showing that the inhibition of astrocytes can prevent the development of neuropathic pain (Zhuang et al., 2006) and morphine tolerance (Song and Zhao, 2001). In particular, a study using primary astrocyte cultures has demonstrated that morphine treatment increases the synthesis and secretion of proteins in astrocytes (Rönnbäck and Hansson, 1988). Therefore, the current study proposes that inhibition of both astrocyte and microglia in the spinal cord underlies the modulation of morphine tolerance by MrgC receptor.
Activation/inhibition of behavioral or signaling pathways of pain can be dissociated by changes in glial marker expression in the spinal cord (Zhuang et al., 2006; Horvath et al., 2010) or DRG (Fu et al., 2010). An increase in glial marker expression may not be correlated necessarily with pain hypersensitivity (Ulmann et al., 2008; Beggs et al., 2012). Therefore, we further studied the effect of MrgC receptor on the functional changes in activated glial cells. P2X4 receptor and IL-1β are upregulated in glial cells as functional changes in activated glia following chronic morphine exposure (Hutchinson et al., 2011). P2X4 receptor is expressed in microglia (Tsuda et al., 2003; Ulmann et al., 2008). P2X4 receptor signaling is involved in the pathogenesis of neuropathic pain (Beggs et al., 2012; Tsuda, 2017) and morphine tolerance (Horvath et al., 2010). Chronic morphine use enhances P2X4 receptor expression in microglial cultures (Horvath and DeLeo, 2009) and the spinal dorsal horn in vivo (Horvath et al., 2010). In particular, knocking down P2X4 receptor by intrathecal administration of antisense oligonucleotide attenuated the development of morphine tolerance as well as morphine-induced increase of Iba1 (microglial marker) and GFAP expressions (Horvath et al., 2010). IL-1β is mainly sourced from activated astrocytes (Palma et al., 1997) and microglia (Tikka et al., 2001). This cytokine can sensitize spinal sensory neurons (Reeve et al., 2000; Kawasaki et al., 2008) as it enhances neuronal N-methyl-d-aspartic acid conductance (Viviani et al., 2003), inhibits glutamate transporter-1 (GLT-1) and glutamate-aspartate transporter (GLAST) (Prow and Irani, 2008) and facilitates the release of other nociceptive molecules, including substance P (Inoue et al., 1999) and prostaglandin (Samad et al., 2001). IL-1β is elevated in morphine-tolerant animals (Johnston et al., 2004; Raghavendra et al., 2004). Blockade of IL-1β receptor signaling prevents the induction of morphine tolerance (Shavit et al., 2005) and also reverses the analgesic tolerance to morphine (Johnston et al., 2004; Shavit et al., 2005). As in previous studies, our data showed that chronic morphine exposure induced an increase in expression of P2X4 receptor and IL-1β. Importantly, the increase in these two molecules was attenuated or inhibited following the intermittent MrgC receptor activation. These results suggest that the attenuation of P2X4 and IL-1β expressions by MrgC receptor can result in the inhibition of morphine tolerance.
The dorsal root ganglion is one of key sites of nociceptive processing (Millan, 1999) and an active organ in the induction of chronic pain (Krames, 2014). It also plays an important role in morphine tolerance by multiple mechanisms, including the increase in expression of nociceptive mediators (Liu and Prather, 2001; Walwyn et al., 2007; Hong et al., 2010). MrgC receptor is uniquely distributed in DRG neurons (Dong et al., 2001) and the central terminals of primary afferents (Huang et al., 2014). Chronic morphine exposure upregulates MrgC receptor expression in superficial laminae of the spinal cord and MrgC mRNA level in DRG (Huang et al., 2014) likewise to that observed in neuropathic pain (He et al., 2014a). Therefore, effects of MrgC receptor activation on the expression of TLR4 and fractalkine in DRG were determined. Chronic treatment with morphine upregulates expression of TLR4 (Hutchinson et al., 2008), leading to the induction of proinflammation (Wang et al., 2012), whereas the blockade of TLR4 activity attenuates the development of morphine tolerance (Hutchinson et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2011). TLR4 is present in sensory neurons, but not in non-neuronal cells, in the DRG (Due et al., 2012). Activation of TLR4 induces hyperexcitability of DRG neurons by increasing sodium current (Due et al., 2012, 2014). Fractalkine, also named CX3CL1, is a chemokine and is only expressed in neurons, not in glial cells, in DRG (Verge et al., 2004; Milligan et al., 2008). Because its only receptor, CX3CR, is expressed in microglia (Milligan et al., 2008) and satellite cells (Souza et al., 2013), fractalkine is believed to play a critical role in neuron-to-glia communication (Milligan et al., 2008; Clark et al., 2009). Indeed, fractalkine signaling in DRG has been demonstrated to be involved in nociceptive transmission in inflammatory pain (Souza et al., 2013; Zhu et al., 2013) and neuropathic pain (Galloway and Chattopadhyay, 2013). Injection of fractalkine into DRG can produce pain hypersensitivity, which is attributed to the production and release of tumor necrosis factor α, IL-1β, and prostaglandin E2 from satellite cells (Souza et al., 2013). However, whether TLR4 and fractalkine signaling in DRG contribute to the development of morphine tolerance has not been known. We demonstrated that chronic exposure to morphine increased the expression of TLR4 and fractalkine in DRG in vivo and/or ex vivo. These results can be interpreted as the involvement of TLR4 and fractalkine in morphine tolerance, since the increase in TLR4 (Due et al., 2012, 2014) and fractalkine (Souza et al., 2013) signaling can induce hyperexcitability of DRG neurons. On the other hand, treatment with BAM8-22 abolished increases in TLR4 and fractalkine induced by chronic morphine in and/or ex vivo. As an increase in nociceptive mediators in DRG is one of the major pathologic alterations in morphine tolerance and MrgC receptor is expressed in DRG neurons, modulation of the expression of TLR4 and fractalkine in DRG by MrgC receptor activation may be ascribed to the inhibition of glial activation and expression of P2X4 and IL-1β in the spinal cord.
Chronic morphine administration results in a reduction or loss of morphine-induced analgesia and pain hypersensitivity, making pain management difficult. Therefore, the prevention of opioid tolerance is critical to pain management in the clinic. The current study showed that the activation of MrgC receptor attenuated morphine-activated morphologic changes in astrocytes and microglia in the spinal cord. MrgC receptor also inhibited the expression of P2X4 receptor and IL-1β, the functional changes of activated glia. Furthermore, MrgC receptor activation inhibited the morphine-induced expression of TLR4 and fractalkine in DRG. Administration of BAM8-22 alone has been shown to not change the expression of protein kinase Cγ (Chen et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2015), phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase, and G proteins (Gi, Gs, and Gq) in the spinal dorsal horn and/or DRG (Wang et al., 2015). However, we cannot exclude the possibility that BAM8-22 could lower GFAP, OX-42, P2X4, IL-1B, TLR4, or fractalkine by itself. Taken all together, we suggest that the inhibition of TLR4 and fractalkine in DRG may underlie the effects of MrgC on spinal glial activation, leading to the inhibition of morphine tolerance. Studies to further reveal mechanisms of MrgC-induced inhibition of TLR4 and fractalkine are warranted.
Authorship Contributions
Participated in research design: Huang, Hong.
Conducted experiments: Zhang, Wang, Lu, Li, Lin.
Performed data analysis: Zhang, Wang, Li, Lin.
Wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript: Hong.
Footnotes
- Received July 29, 2018.
- Accepted November 20, 2018.
Research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 31371124 and 81571084]. None of the authors has a conflict of interest.
Abbreviations
- BAM8-22
- bovine adrenal medulla 8-22
- DMEM
- Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium
- DRG
- dorsal root ganglia
- GAPDH
- glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase
- GFAP
- glial fibrillary acidic protein
- IL-1β
- interleukin-1β
- i.t.
- intrathecally
- MOR
- μ-opioid receptor
- MPE
- maximum possible effect
- Mrg
- Mas-related gene
- OX-42
- integrin α M antibody
- P2X4
- P2X purinoceptor 4
- PBS
- phosphate-buffered saline
- TFL
- tail flick latency
- TLR4
- Toll-like receptor 4
- Copyright © 2019 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics