Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Visit jpet on Facebook
  • Follow jpet on Twitter
  • Follow jpet on LinkedIn
Research ArticleBehavioral Pharmacology

Cebranopadol Blocks the Escalation of Cocaine Intake and Conditioned Reinstatement of Cocaine Seeking in Rats

Giordano de Guglielmo, Alessandra Matzeu, Jenni Kononoff, Julia Mattioni, Rémi Martin-Fardon and Olivier George
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics September 2017, 362 (3) 378-384; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.117.241042
Giordano de Guglielmo
Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alessandra Matzeu
Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jenni Kononoff
Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julia Mattioni
Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rémi Martin-Fardon
Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olivier George
Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Cebranopadol is a novel agonist of nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide (NOP) and opioid receptors with analgesic properties that is being evaluated in clinical Phase 2 and Phase 3 trials for the treatment of chronic and acute pain. Recent evidence indicates that the combination of opioid and NOP receptor agonism may be a new treatment strategy for cocaine addiction. We sought to extend these findings by examining the effects of cebranopadol on cocaine self-administration (0.5 mg/kg/infusion) and cocaine conditioned reinstatement in rats with extended access to cocaine. Oral administration of cebranopadol (0, 25, and 50 μg/kg) reversed the escalation of cocaine self-administration in rats that were given extended (6 hour) access to cocaine, whereas it did not affect the self-administration of sweetened condensed milk (SCM). Cebranopadol induced conditioned place preference but did not affect locomotor activity during the conditioning sessions. Finally, cebranopadol blocked the conditioned reinstatement of cocaine seeking. These results show that oral cebranopadol treatment prevented addiction-like behaviors (i.e., the escalation of intake and reinstatement), suggesting that it may be a novel strategy for the treatment of cocaine use disorder. However, the conditioned place preference that was observed after cebranopadol administration suggests that this compound may have some intrinsic rewarding effects.

Introduction

Cocaine use disorder is a major health and social problem for which there is no approved medication (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2010). Most of the pharmacological strategies that have been proposed for the treatment of cocaine addiction have targeted the dopamine system because the acute rewarding effects of cocaine are mediated by the inhibition of dopamine reuptake in the mesocorticolimbic dopamine system (Wise, 1996; Gardner and Ashby, 2000). Unfortunately, these treatment approaches have been ineffective (Grabowski et al., 2000; Haney et al., 2001; Nann-Vernotica et al., 2001; Gorelick et al., 2004).

Accumulating evidence indicates that a novel strategy that targets both nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide (NOP) receptors and μ-opioid receptors (MORs) may be useful for the treatment of addictions (Khroyan et al., 2007,2011; Toll, 2013; Kallupi et al., 2017a). Buprenorphine is a MOR and NOP receptor partial agonist that has been approved for the treatment of opioid use disorder and has been shown to attenuate the expression of cocaine sensitization in rats (Placenza et al., 2008). Decreases in cocaine self-administration after buprenorphine administration have been reported in both animal models and humans (Mello et al., 1989; Montoya et al., 2004; Sorge and Stewart, 2006b; Wee et al., 2012). These effects have been hypothesized to result from the partial agonist effects of buprenorphine on MORs (Mello et al., 1993), which confers buprenorphine lower abuse liability compared with morphine and is reflected by its classification as a Schedule III compound by the United States Drug Enforcement Administration. However, buprenorphine is also a partial agonist at the NOP receptor (Spagnolo et al., 2008; Khroyan et al., 2009). Its effects on NOP receptors may explain some of its therapeutic effects and lower addiction potential. For example, NOP receptor agonists have been reported to increase the analgesic effects of MOR agonists (Courteix et al., 2004; Cremeans et al., 2012), decrease dopamine release from neurons in brain areas that are associated with the reward pathway (Ikemoto and Panksepp, 1999; Toll, 2013), decrease morphine-induced conditioned place preference (Ciccocioppo et al., 2000), and attenuate the rewarding effects of opioids in rats (Murphy et al., 1999; Rutten et al., 2010). Interestingly, recent results showed that buprenorphine requires concomitant activation of NOP and MOP receptors to reduce cocaine consumption in rats (Kallupi et al., 2017a). This evidence suggests that compounds with high efficacy at MORs and NOP receptors may be useful for the treatment of drug addiction. Importantly, however, a specific NOP receptor agonist failed to prevent cocaine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP), the extinction of cocaine-induced CPP, and the stress- and cocaine-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking (Sartor et al., 2016), suggesting that specific NOP receptor agonists may not be a relevant strategy for the treatment of cocaine use disorder.

The present study tested the hypothesis that oral administration of cebranopadol (trans-6′-fluoro-4′,9′-dihydro-N,N-dimethyl-4-phenyl-spiro[cyclohexane-1,1′[3′H]-pyrano[3,4-b]indol]-4-amine), a small molecule that targets opioid receptors, has preclinical efficacy in reducing addiction-like behavior in an animal model of cocaine use disorder. Cebranopadol is a novel opioid receptor agonist with analgesic properties, full agonist activity at NOP receptors and MORs, and partial agonist activity at κ-opioid receptors and δ-opioid receptors (Linz et al., 2014; Schunk et al., 2014). Cebranopadol has been shown to exert potent and effective analgesic and antihypersensitive effects in several rat models of acute and chronic pain (e.g., tail-flick test, rheumatoid arthritis, bone cancer, spinal nerve ligation, and diabetic neuropathy). It has a long duration of action (>9 hours after oral administration of 55 μg/kg in the rat tail-flick test). Unlike morphine, cebranopadol does not disrupt motor coordination or respiration at doses that are within or exceed the analgesic dose range (Linz et al., 2014; Schunk et al., 2014; Lambert et al., 2015). Given these unique pharmacological characteristics, we tested the efficacy of cebranopadol in inhibiting the escalation of cocaine intake and preventing cocaine-seeking behavior in rats with a history of extended access to cocaine self-administration. We also evaluated the potential rewarding effects of cebranopadol by measuring cebranopadol-induced conditioned place preference. Finally, we evaluated the behavioral specificity of cebranopadol by comparing its effects on cocaine-directed behavior with behavior that was maintained by a highly palatable conventional reinforcer [sweetened condensed milk (SCM)].

Materials and Methods

Animals

Male Wistar rats (Charles River, Wilmington, MA; n = 45) were housed two per cage on a reverse 12 hour/12 hour light/dark cycle (lights off at 8:00 AM) in a temperature (20–22°C)- and humidity (45–55%)-controlled vivarium with ad libitum access to tap water and food pellets (PJ Noyes Company, Lancaster, NH). All of the procedures were conducted in strict adherence to the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of The Scripps Research Institute. At the time of testing, the rats’ body weight ranged between 350 and 400 g.

Intravenous Catheterization

The animals were anesthetized by inhalation of a mixture of isoflurane, and intravenous catheters were aseptically inserted in the right jugular vein using a modified version of a procedure that was described previously (Caine and Koob, 1993; de Guglielmo et al., 2013). The vein was punctured with a 22-gauge needle, and the tubing was inserted and secured inside the vein by tying the vein with suture thread. The catheter assembly consisted of an 18 cm length of Micro-Renathane tubing (0.023 inch inner diameter, 0.037 inch outer diameter; Braintree Scientific, Braintree, MA) that was attached to a guide cannula (Plastics One, Roanoke, VA). The guide cannula was bent at a near right angle, embedded in dental acrylic, and anchored with a mesh (1 mm thick, 2 cm square). The catheter exited through a small incision on the back, and the base was sealed with a small plastic cap and metal cover cap. This design helped to keep the catheter base sterile and protected. The catheters were flushed daily with heparinized saline (10 U/ml of heparin sodium; American Pharmaceutical Partners, Schaumburg, IL) in 0.9% bacteriostatic sodium chloride (Hospira, Lake Forest, IL) that contained 20 mg/0.2 ml of the antibiotic Timetin (GlaxoSmithKline).

Drugs

Cebranopadol (Med Chem Express, Monmouth Junction, NJ) was dissolved in vehicle that consisted of 5% dimethylsulfoxide, 5% Emulphor (Solvay, Bruxelles, Belgium), and 90% distilled water. The solution was vortexed before filling a 1-ml syringe for oral injection. Cebranopadol was injected orally by gavage at doses of 0.0, 25, and 50 μg/kg. Cocaine HCl (National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD) was dissolved in 0.9% saline (Hospira, Lake Forest, IL) at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg/infusion and self-administered intravenously. Sweetened condensed milk (Nestlé, Solon, OH) was diluted 2:1 (v/v) in water.

Operant Training

Self-administration was performed in operant conditioning chambers (Med Associates, St. Albans, VT) that were enclosed in lit, sound-attenuating, ventilated environmental cubicles. The front door and back wall of the chambers were constructed of transparent plastic and the other walls were opaque metal. Each chamber was equipped with two retractable levers that were located on the front panel. Cocaine was delivered through plastic catheter tubing that was connected to an infusion pump. The infusion pump was activated by responses on the right (active) lever. Responses on the left (inactive) lever were recorded but did not have any scheduled consequences. Activation of the pump resulted in the delivery of 0.1 ml of the fluid. A computer controlled fluid delivery and behavioral data recording.

For the studies of SCM self-administration, each chamber was equipped with a reservoir that was positioned 4 cm above the grid floor in the center of the front panel of the chamber. Two retractable levers were each located 3 cm away from the SCM receptacle (one lever on the right and one on the left). A pump was activated by responses on the right (active) lever, and responses on the left (inactive) lever were recorded but did not have scheduled consequences. Active lever presses resulted in the delivery of 0.1 ml of SCM. A computer controlled fluid delivery and recorded the total number of rewards and number of right and left lever presses.

Effect of Cebranopadol on the Escalation of Cocaine Self-Administration

Rats (n = 14) were trained to self-administer cocaine under a fixed-ratio 1 (FR1) schedule of reinforcement in daily 6-hour sessions. Each active lever press resulted in the delivery of one cocaine dose (0.5 mg/kg/0.1 ml infusion). A 20-second timeout (TO) period followed each cocaine infusion. During the timeout period, responses on the active lever did not have scheduled consequences. This TO period occurred concurrently with illumination of a cue light that was located above the active lever to signal delivery of the positive reinforcement. The rats were trained to self-administer cocaine in 15 sessions (5 days/week) until a stable baseline of reinforcement was achieved (<10% variation over the last three sessions). A within-subjects Latin-square design was used for the drug treatments. The rats were orally injected with cebranopadol (0, 25, and 50 μg/kg) 30 minutes before beginning the sessions. Oral administration was performed by gavage using a 19-gauge needle and 8 cm of Tygon tubing (0.030 inch inner diameter, 0.090 inch outer diameter). The animals were subjected to cocaine self-administration at 2-day intervals between drug tests.

Effect of Cebranopadol on Sweetened Condensed Milk Self-Administration

Rats (n = 12) were trained to self-administer SCM under an FR1 schedule of reinforcement for 6 hours per day to match cocaine self-administration. After each SCM reward delivery, a 20-second TO period occurred, during which responses on the active lever had no scheduled consequences. This TO period occurred concurrently with illumination of a cue light that was located above the active lever to signal delivery of the positive reinforcement. The rats were trained to self-administer SCM for several days until a stable baseline of reinforcement was achieved (<10% variation over the last three sessions). When the stable baseline was reached, the rats orally received cebranopadol (0, 25, and 50 μg/kg) 30 minutes before beginning the next session. The animals were subjected to SCM self-administration at 2-day intervals between drug tests.

Cebranopadol-Induced Conditioned Place Preference and Locomotor Activity

Cebranopadol-induced CPP was evaluated using a biased, counterbalanced CPP procedure. Naive rats (n = 9) were handled and habituated to oral administration for 1 week before beginning the study. The experiment consisted of three 30-minute phases: pretest (one session), conditioning (eight sessions), and preference test (one session). The rats were placed in a dim (40 lux) room 30 minutes before starting the tests. A two-chambered (38 cm × 32 cm × 32 cm) place conditioning apparatus was used, with visual cues on the walls (stripes or dots for compartments A and B, respectively) and tactile cues on the floor (smooth or rough for compartments A and B, respectively). On day 1 (pretest), naive rats were placed between the two chambers and allowed to freely explore both chambers for 30 minutes. Individual bias toward either compartment A or B was observed, and the animals were assigned to place conditioning subgroups according to their least-preferred compartment; therefore, biased assignment was used. Conditioning was performed within subjects. Each rat received cebranopadol (25 μg/kg orally) and vehicle on alternating days in a counterbalanced design 30 minutes before being placed in the conditioning chamber. The preference test was performed 24 hours after the last conditioning session. Thirty minutes after vehicle administration, the rats were placed in the nonconditioned side of the apparatus with free access to both chambers. The time spent in the different chambers was recorded. Locomotor activity was recorded in each phase (pretest, conditioning, and preference test) using a video camera that was connected to the ANY-maze Video Tracking System 5.11 (Wood Dale, IL).

Effect of Cebranopadol on Conditioned Reinstatement of Cocaine-seeking Behavior

Cocaine Self-Administration Training.

Rats (n = 10) were surgically prepared with indwelling microurethane catheters that were inserted in the right jugular vein. After 7 days of postsurgical recovery, the rats began self-administration training. The rats were trained to self-administer cocaine (0.5 mg/kg/0.1 ml infusion, i.v.) for 6 hours/day on an FR1 schedule in the presence of a contextual/discriminative stimulus (SD). Each session was initiated by extending two retractable levers into the operant conditioning chamber. Constant 70-dB white noise served as a discriminative stimulus that signaled availability of the reinforcer throughout the session. Responses on the right, active lever were reinforced with a dose of cocaine, followed by a 20-second TO period that was signaled by illumination of a cue light above the active lever. During this TO period, the lever remained inactive to prevent accidental overdosing with cocaine. Responses on the left, inactive lever had no scheduled consequences.

Extinction.

After completion of the training procedure (21 sessions), the extinction phase began. The rats were subjected to daily 2-hour extinction sessions, in which responses on the previously active lever had no programmed consequences (i.e., no cocaine delivery and no cue presentation). This phase lasted until responding was extinguished (<10 responses per session for 3 consecutive days).

Conditioned Reinstatement.

Twenty-four hours after the last extinction session, all of the rats were presented with neutral stimuli (SN) in a 2-hour session to control for the specificity of the SD to reinstate extinguished cocaine-seeking behavior. The neutral stimuli (SN) that signaled the nonavailability of the reinforcer consisted of illumination of a 2.8-W house light that was located on top of the chamber’s front panel for the entire duration of the session (2 hours). Responses at the right active lever were followed by the presentation of a 20-second intermittent tone, during which the lever remained inactive.

Two days later, the rats were presented with the SD. To evaluate the effect of cebranopadol on the conditioned reinstatement of cocaine seeking, the rats were treated with cebranopadol (0, 25, and 50 μg/kg) in a counterbalanced Latin-square design 30 minutes before the reinstatement test. The reinstatement test lasted 2 hours under SD conditions, except that cocaine was unavailable. Cebranopadol was administered only in the SD conditions, with a 2-day interval between tests.

Statistical Analysis

The effects of cebranopadol on cocaine self-administration, SCM self-administration, and conditioned reinstatement and differences in responding during the extinction, SN, and SD sessions were analyzed using one-way within-subjects analysis of variance (ANOVA). Locomotor activity and the time course of cocaine responding were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, with repeated measures for both factors. Conditioned place preference was analyzed using Student’s t test. Significant effects in the ANOVA were followed by the Newman-Keuls post hoc test. Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Effect of Cebranopadol on the Escalation of Cocaine Self-Administration.

After 3 weeks of cocaine self-administration, the rats gradually escalated their cocaine consumption (one-way ANOVA, F14,195 = 8.498, P < 0.001). The Newman-Keuls post hoc test revealed significant escalation of cocaine self-administration that began from session 8 until session 15 compared with the first day of extended access (P < 0.01 for session 8; P < 0.001 for sessions 9–15; Fig. 1A). Treatment with cebranopadol significantly decreased operant responding for cocaine (F2,13 = 31.19, p < 0.001). The Newman-Keuls post hoc test revealed that cebranopadol reduced cocaine self-administration at both doses tested (P < 0.01, 25 versus 0.0 μg/kg; P < 0.001, 50 versus 0.0 μg/kg; Fig. 1B). Cebranopadol dose-dependently decreased the number of cocaine infusions (P < 0.01) to levels that were comparable to the pre-escalation baseline. When all of the data were included in a single statistical analysis (baseline pre-escalation, escalation doses of 0, 25, and 50 μg/kg), the one-way repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant effect of treatment (F13,52 = 4.080, P < 0.001). The Newman-Keuls post hoc test indicated no differences in intake between 50 μg/kg cebranopadol and the pre-escalation baseline. Inactive lever responses were very low and unaffected by cebranopadol (F2,13 = 0.089). Figure 1C shows the time course of hourly infusions during the session, demonstrating that cebranopadol was effective over the entire 6-hour self-administration session. The two-way repeated-measures ANOVA revealed significant effects of treatment (F2,13 = 31.19, P < 0.001) and time (F5,65 = 11.90, P < 0.001).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

(A) Escalation of cocaine self-administration after 15 (6 hours) sessions. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, significantly different from day 1. (B) Effect of cebranopadol on cocaine self-administration. The data are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. number of responses on the active lever (A) and inactive lever (B); n = 14. ###P < 0.001, significantly different from Baseline. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, significantly different from vehicle-treated rats (0.0 μg/kg). $$P < 0.01, 50 μg/kg versus 25 μg/kg. (C) Hourly time course of infusions.

Effect of Cebranopadol on Sweetened Condensed Milk Self-Administration.

The data were analyzed at two different time points to compare the effects of cebranopadol on SCM and cocaine self-administration. We selected the 1-hour time point to match the number of rewards between cocaine and SCM and the 6-hour time point to match the length of the cocaine session. The one-way repeated-measures ANOVA revealed no effects of cebranopadol on SCM self-administration at 1 hour (F2,11 = 0.63; Fig. 2A) or 6 hours (F2,11 = 0.37; Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Effect of cebranopadol on SCM self-administration after 1 hour (A) or 6 hours (B). The data are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. number of rewards; n = 12.

Cebranopadol-Induced Conditioned Place Preference and Locomotor activity.

We found no significant overall bias toward either of the compartments during the pretest, measured as the mean time spent in compartment A (812 ± 116 seconds) and compartment B (964 ± 117 seconds; t8 = 0.6557, P = 0.5304). The two-way repeated-measures ANOVA revealed no effects of cebranopadol on general locomotor activity during the conditioning sessions, with no effects of treatment (F1,8 = 0.008) or time (F3,24 = 2.8) and no treatment × time interaction (F1,8 = 0.33; Fig. 3A). However, cebranopadol induced conditioned place preference compared with the time spent in the drug-paired side during the pretest and preference test (t8 = 4.736, P < 0.01; Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

(A) Average total distance traveled (in meters) during the four sessions of CPP conditioning after oral injection of cebranopadol or vehicle. (B) Cebranopadol-induced conditioned place preference. The data are expressed as the time spent in the drug-paired chamber; n = 9, **P < 0.01 versus Pretest.

Effect of Cebranopadol on the Conditioned Reinstatement of Cocaine-seeking Behavior.

At the end of the cocaine self-administration phase, the average number of reinforced responses was 126 ± 6.2. During extinction, lever pressing decreased from 42.3 ± 8.3 during the first session to 10.2 ± 1.9 during the last extinction session (16 total sessions). As shown in Fig. 4A, reintroduction of the cocaine-discriminative cues (SD) but not neutral stimuli (SN) significantly reinstated extinguished cocaine-seeking behavior (F2,9 = 11.61, P < 0.001). Inactive lever presses were unaltered by cue presentation (F2,9 = 1.48; Fig. 4B). The one-way repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant effect of cebranopadol treatment on the conditioned reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior (F2,9 = 10.12, P < 0.001). The Newman-Keuls post hoc test indicated that oral treatment with 50 μg/kg cebranopadol 30 minutes before the reinstatement test significantly reduced cocaine-seeking behavior (P < 0.01 versus 0.0 μg/kg; P < 0.05 versus 25 μg/kg; Fig. 4A). Responses on the inactive lever remained negligible and unaltered by cebranopadol treatment (F2,9 = 0.82; Fig. 4B).

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Effect of cebranopadol on the conditioned reinstatement of cocaine seeking. During the self-administration training phase, the rats learned to press the lever for cocaine in the presence of a contextual/discriminative stimulus (SD). During extinction (Ext), lever responding progressively decreased. Twenty-four hours after the last extinction session, all of the rats were presented with a neutral stimulus (SN), and the number of responses on the previous cocaine-paired lever was not reinstated. In the reinstatement test, responses to the cocaine-paired cues increased in the presence of the SD. Cebranopadol at the dose of 50 μg/kg significantly reduced relapse that was elicited by presentation of the SD. The data are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. number of responses on the cocaine active lever (A) and inactive lever (B); n = 10. ##P < 0.01, significantly different from extinction; ***P < 0.01, significantly different from vehicle-treated rats (0.0 μg/kg); $P < 0.05, significantly different from 25 μg/kg.

Discussion

The present study demonstrated that cebranopadol dose-dependently reduced cocaine self-administration in rats that had extended access to cocaine (Fig. 1B). Cebranopadol reduced cocaine intake during the entire 6-hour session and did not affect inactive lever responding. Furthermore, it had no effect on the self-administration of a natural and highly palatable reinforcer (SCM). Finally, cebranopadol prevented the conditioned reinstatement of cocaine seeking, but it produced conditioned place preference.

The reduction of cocaine self-administration by cebranopadol is consistent with the effects of buprenorphine (a partial agonist at MORs and NOP receptors) on cocaine intake in rhesus monkeys (Mello et al., 1992) and rats (Sorge and Stewart, 2006a; Wee et al., 2012). However, buprenorphine and methadone are often associated with a decrease in locomotor activity (Marquez et al., 2007). In the present study, we did not observe any differences in locomotor activity after cebranopadol administration, suggesting that the decreases in cocaine self-administration and cocaine seeking in the reinstatement test were not attributable to nonspecific motor effects, and cebranopadol may have fewer undesirable side effects than buprenorphine and methadone.

The lack of effect of cebranopadol on SCM self-administration (compared with cocaine) did not likely result from different levels of responding for each reward because responses during the SCM self-administration were analyzed at two different time points to match both the number of rewards (1 hour; Fig. 2A) and length of the cocaine and SCM self-administration sessions (6 hours; Fig. 2B). Importantly, this selectivity of the effect of cebranopadol on cocaine self-administration was not reported with buprenorphine. Buprenorphine decreased the self-administration of both glucose and saccharin in rats (Carroll and Lac, 1992) and monkeys (Carroll et al., 1992). Therefore, the data suggest that cebranopadol has better selectivity in preventing behavior that is motivated by drugs of abuse over behavior that is directed toward a highly palatable food reward.

Nociceptin blocks morphine-, cocaine-, and alcohol-induced CPP (Ciccocioppo et al., 1999,2002; Murphy et al., 1999; Sakoori and Murphy, 2004), and it does not have any rewarding properties when administered alone (Devine et al., 1996). Additionally, NOP receptor agonists attenuate morphine-induced CPP (Shoblock et al., 2005). Intracerebroventricular nociceptin administration inhibited cocaine-induced CPP (Kotlinska et al., 2002). In contrast to these reports, recent data showed that genetic deletion of the nociceptin receptor in rats conferred resilience to abused psychoactive drugs (Kallupi et al., 2017b), and NOP receptor antagonism blocked both nicotine and alcohol self-administration in a coadministration paradigm (Cippitelli et al., 2016). One hypothesis is that these effects of NOP receptor agonists are mediated by mechanisms that involve the downregulation or desensitization of NOP receptors (Ciccocioppo et al., 2014). Several groups have reported rapid and robust NOP receptor desensitization and internalization in vitro in response to nociceptin or NOP receptor agonists (Dautzenberg et al., 2001; Corbani et al., 2004; Spampinato and Baiula, 2006).

Given the agonist properties of cebranopadol at both MORs and NOP receptors, we hypothesized that it would not induce CPP because NOP receptor agonism would attenuate MOR-mediated rewarding effects. However, in the present study, cebranopadol induced CPP, suggesting that full agonist activity and equivalent potency at NOP receptors and MORs was insufficient to prevent the rewarding effects of MOR activation. Nevertheless, because of the biased CPP design, cebranopadol-induced CPP may reflect its rewarding properties and possible anxiolytic-like effects (Tzschentke, 1998). Similar findings were reported by Khroyan et al. (2007), in which they characterized SR 16435, a compound that has a pharmacological profile that is similar to cebranopadol.

After the escalation of cocaine self-administration stabilizes, rats exhibit a very stable and reproducible pattern of behavior that is characterized by an initial loading phase, followed by the development of a regular response pattern and dose titration (Ahmed and Koob, 1998, 1999). When administered orally 30 minutes before the session, cebranopadol dose-dependently reduced the number of cocaine infusions during the loading phase (Fig. 1C). At the end of the loading phase, cebranopadol continued to dose-dependently reduce cocaine intake, demonstrating its long duration of action. One approach for treating cocaine addiction focuses on the use of compounds that have the same primary actions as the abused drug but a longer duration of action paired with lower intrinsic abuse potential and fewer toxic side effects (Kreek, 1997). We observed a long duration of action of cebranopadol (>6 hours), suggesting that cebranopadol may act similarly to buprenorphine and methadone as a slow-acting agonist/indirect agonist. Overall, cebranopadol may be a better candidate for substitution therapy for cocaine abuse because it appears to have fewer nonspecific effects on the motivation to seek and take natural rewards.

Environmental stimuli that are associated with cocaine use are major factors that can cause intense craving and precipitate cocaine relapse in humans. Stimuli that are predictive of the availability of cocaine reliably elicit strong craving and relapse of drug seeking, even after several months of abstinence (Weiss et al., 2001; Ciccocioppo et al., 2004; Martin-Fardon and Weiss, 2016). Cebranopadol significantly and dose-dependently reduced the cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior, without affecting inactive responding. Cebranopadol decreased the reinstatement of cocaine seeking in the absence of cocaine under extinction conditions, demonstrating that it may decrease the motivation to seek and take cocaine, independent of changes in blood levels of cocaine. These results are consistent with the decrease in cocaine seeking that was induced by buprenorphine in the presence of drug-associated cues during extinction (Sorge et al., 2005).

One limitation of the present study was the lack of full characterization of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cebranopadol. We also did not evaluate the effects of cebranopadol on the pharmacokinetics of cocaine. However, we do not believe that the reduction of cocaine escalation was related to possible pharmacokinetic effects on blood cocaine levels because cebranopadol effectively reduced conditioned reinstatement. In this case, cocaine was unavailable, thus excluding possible effects on blood cocaine levels. We also did not identify shifts in the dose-response curve or specific receptors that mediate its preclinical efficacy. Follow-up studies are needed to fully characterize the reinforcing properties and possible abuse potential of cebranopadol, particularly considering that we found that cebranopadol produced conditioned place preference. However, although such characterization studies are important from a theoretical perspective to understand the precise mechanisms of action and facilitate medication development, cebranopadol has already been shown to be well tolerated in humans and is already being tested in several clinical trials for the treatment of pain.

In summary, the present study provides preclinical evidence of the efficacy of cebranopadol in reversing compulsive-like responding for cocaine and cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking. Cebranopadol may be a new therapeutic option for the prevention of cocaine abuse and relapse.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Michael Arends for proofreading the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Participated in research design: de Guglielmo, Martin-Fardon, and George.

Conducted experiments: de Guglielmo, Matzeu, Kononoff, and Mattioni.

Performed data analysis: de Guglielmo.

Wrote or contributed to writing the manuscript: de Guglielmo, Martin-Fardon, and George.

Footnotes

    • Received February 27, 2017.
    • Accepted June 21, 2017.
  • This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (grants AA006420, AA020608, and AA022977 to O.G. and grants DA033344 and AA024146 to R.M.F.) and by the Sigrid Juselius Foundation (J.K.).

  • https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.117.241042.

Abbreviations

ANOVA
analysis of variance
CPP
conditioned place preference
FR1
fixed-ratio 1
MOR
μ-opioid receptor
NOP
nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide
SCM
sweetened condensed milk
SD
contextual/discriminative stimulus
SN
neutral stimulus
TO
timeout
  • Copyright © 2017 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

References

  1. ↵
    1. Ahmed SH and
    2. Koob GF
    (1998) Transition from moderate to excessive drug intake: change in hedonic set point. Science 282:298–300.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Ahmed SH and
    2. Koob GF
    (1999) Long-lasting increase in the set point for cocaine self-administration after escalation in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 146:303–312.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Caine SB and
    2. Koob GF
    (1993) Modulation of cocaine self-administration in the rat through D-3 dopamine receptors. Science 260:1814–1816.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Carroll ME,
    2. Carmona GN,
    3. May SA,
    4. Buzalsky S, and
    5. Larson C
    (1992) Buprenorphine’s effects on self-administration of smoked cocaine base and orally delivered phencyclidine, ethanol and saccharin in rhesus monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 261:26–37.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Carroll ME and
    2. Lac ST
    (1992) Effects of buprenorphine on self-administration of cocaine and a nondrug reinforcer in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 106:439–446.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Ciccocioppo R,
    2. Angeletti S,
    3. Sanna PP,
    4. Weiss F, and
    5. Massi M
    (2000) Effect of nociceptin/orphanin FQ on the rewarding properties of morphine. Eur J Pharmacol 404:153–159.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Ciccocioppo R,
    2. Martin-Fardon R, and
    3. Weiss F
    (2004) Stimuli associated with a single cocaine experience elicit long-lasting cocaine-seeking. Nat Neurosci 7:495–496.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Ciccocioppo R,
    2. Panocka I,
    3. Polidori C,
    4. Regoli D, and
    5. Massi M
    (1999) Effect of nociceptin on alcohol intake in alcohol-preferring rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 141:220–224.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Ciccocioppo R,
    2. Polidori C,
    3. Antonelli L,
    4. Salvadori S,
    5. Guerrini R, and
    6. Massi M
    (2002) Pharmacological characterization of the nociceptin receptor which mediates reduction of alcohol drinking in rats. Peptides 23:117–125.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Ciccocioppo R,
    2. Stopponi S,
    3. Economidou D,
    4. Kuriyama M,
    5. Kinoshita H,
    6. Heilig M,
    7. Roberto M,
    8. Weiss F, and
    9. Teshima K
    (2014) Chronic treatment with novel brain-penetrating selective NOP receptor agonist MT-7716 reduces alcohol drinking and seeking in the rat. Neuropsychopharmacology 39:2601–2610.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Cippitelli A,
    2. Schoch J,
    3. Debevec G,
    4. Brunori G,
    5. Zaveri NT, and
    6. Toll L
    (2016) A key role for the N/OFQ-NOP receptor system in modulating nicotine taking in a model of nicotine and alcohol co-administration. Sci Rep 6:26594.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Corbani M,
    2. Gonindard C, and
    3. Meunier JC
    (2004) Ligand-regulated internalization of the opioid receptor-like 1: a confocal study. Endocrinology 145:2876–2885.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Courteix C,
    2. Coudore-Civiale MA,
    3. Privat AM,
    4. Pelissier T,
    5. Eschalier A, and
    6. Fialip J
    (2004) Evidence for an exclusive antinociceptive effect of nociceptin/orphanin FQ, an endogenous ligand for the ORL1 receptor, in two animal models of neuropathic pain. Pain 110:236–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Cremeans CM,
    2. Gruley E,
    3. Kyle DJ, and
    4. Ko MC
    (2012) Roles of mu-opioid receptors and nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide receptors in buprenorphine-induced physiological responses in primates. Journal of Pharmacol and Exper Ther 343:72–81.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Dautzenberg FM,
    2. Wichmann J,
    3. Higelin J,
    4. Py-Lang G,
    5. Kratzeisen C,
    6. Malherbe P,
    7. Kilpatrick GJ, and
    8. Jenck F
    (2001) Pharmacological characterization of the novel nonpeptide orphanin FQ/nociceptin receptor agonist Ro 64-6198: rapid and reversible desensitization of the ORL1 receptor in vitro and lack of tolerance in vivo. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 298:812–819.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. de Guglielmo G,
    2. Cippitelli A,
    3. Somaini L,
    4. Gerra G,
    5. Li H,
    6. Stopponi S,
    7. Ubaldi M,
    8. Kallupi M, and
    9. Ciccocioppo R
    (2013) Pregabalin reduces cocaine self-administration and relapse to cocaine seeking in the rat. Addict Biol 18:644–653.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Devine DP,
    2. Reinscheid RK,
    3. Monsma FJ Jr.,
    4. Civelli O, and
    5. Akil H
    (1996) The novel neuropeptide orphanin FQ fails to produce conditioned place preference or aversion. Brain Res 727:225–229.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Gardner EL and
    2. Ashby CR Jr.
    (2000) Heterogeneity of the mesotelencephalic dopamine fibers: physiology and pharmacology. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 24:115–118.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Gorelick DA,
    2. Gardner EL, and
    3. Xi ZX
    (2004) Agents in development for the management of cocaine abuse. Drugs 64:1547–1573.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Grabowski J,
    2. Rhoades H,
    3. Silverman P,
    4. Schmitz JM,
    5. Stotts A,
    6. Creson D, and
    7. Bailey R
    (2000) Risperidone for the treatment of cocaine dependence: randomized, double-blind trial. J Clin Psychopharmacol 20:305–310.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Haney M,
    2. Ward AS,
    3. Foltin RW, and
    4. Fischman MW
    (2001) Effects of ecopipam, a selective dopamine D1 antagonist, on smoked cocaine self-administration by humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 155:330–337.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Ikemoto S and
    2. Panksepp J
    (1999) The role of nucleus accumbens dopamine in motivated behavior: a unifying interpretation with special reference to reward-seeking. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 31:6–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Kallupi M,
    2. Shen Q,
    3. de Guglielmo G,
    4. Yasuda D,
    5. Journigan VB,
    6. Zaveri NT, and
    7. Ciccocioppo R
    (2017a) Buprenorphine requires concomitant activation of NOP and MOP receptors to reduce cocaine consumption. Addict Biol doi: 10.1111/adb.12513 [published ahead of print].
  24. ↵
    1. Kallupi M,
    2. Scuppa G,
    3. de Guglielmo G,
    4. Calò G,
    5. Weiss F,
    6. Statnick MA,
    7. Rorick-Kehn LM, and
    8. Ciccocioppo R
    (2017b) Genetic deletion of the nociceptin/orphanin fq receptor in the rat confers resilience to the development of drug addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology 42:695–706.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Khroyan TV,
    2. Polgar WE,
    3. Cami-Kobeci G,
    4. Husbands SM,
    5. Zaveri NT, and
    6. Toll L
    (2011) The first universal opioid ligand, (2S)-2-[(5R,6R,7R,14S)-N-cyclopropylmethyl-4,5-epoxy-6,14-ethano-3-hydroxy-6-methoxymorphinan-7-yl]-3,3-dimethylpentan-2-ol (BU08028): characterization of the in vitro profile and in vivo behavioral effects in mouse models of acute pain and cocaine-induced reward. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 336:952–961.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Khroyan TV,
    2. Polgar WE,
    3. Jiang F,
    4. Zaveri NT, and
    5. Toll L
    (2009) Nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptor activation attenuates antinociception induced by mixed nociceptin/orphanin FQ/mu-opioid receptor agonists. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 331:946–953.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Khroyan TV,
    2. Zaveri NT,
    3. Polgar WE,
    4. Orduna J,
    5. Olsen C,
    6. Jiang F, and
    7. Toll L
    (2007) SR 16435 [1-(1-(bicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-yl)piperidin-4-yl)indolin-2-one], a novel mixed nociceptin/orphanin FQ/mu-opioid receptor partial agonist: analgesic and rewarding properties in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 320:934–943.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Kotlińska J,
    2. Wichmann J,
    3. Legowska A,
    4. Rolka K, and
    5. Silberring J
    (2002) Orphanin FQ/nociceptin but not Ro 65-6570 inhibits the expression of cocaine-induced conditioned place preference. Behav Pharmacol 13:229–235.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Kreek MJ
    (1997) Opiate and cocaine addictions: challenge for pharmacotherapies. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 57:551–569.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Lambert DG,
    2. Bird MF, and
    3. Rowbotham DJ
    (2015) Cebranopadol: a first in-class example of a nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptor and opioid receptor agonist. Br J Anaesth 114:364–366.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Linz K,
    2. Christoph T,
    3. Tzschentke TM,
    4. Koch T,
    5. Schiene K,
    6. Gautrois M,
    7. Schröder W,
    8. Kögel BY,
    9. Beier H,
    10. Englberger W, et al.
    (2014) Cebranopadol: a novel potent analgesic nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide and opioid receptor agonist. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 349:535–548.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Marquez P,
    2. Baliram R,
    3. Kieffer BL, and
    4. Lutfy K
    (2007) The mu opioid receptor is involved in buprenorphine-induced locomotor stimulation and conditioned place preference. Neuropharmacology 52:1336–1341.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Martin-Fardon R and
    2. Weiss F
    (2016) Perseveration of craving: effects of stimuli conditioned to drugs of abuse versus conventional reinforcers differing in demand. Addict Biol doi: 10.1111/adb.12374 [published ahead of print].
  34. ↵
    1. Mello NK,
    2. Lukas SE,
    3. Kamien JB,
    4. Mendelson JH,
    5. Drieze J, and
    6. Cone EJ
    (1992) The effects of chronic buprenorphine treatment on cocaine and food self-administration by rhesus monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 260:1185–1193.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Mello NK,
    2. Lukas SE,
    3. Mendelson JH, and
    4. Drieze J
    (1993) Naltrexone-buprenorphine interactions: effects on cocaine self-administration. Neuropsychopharmacology 9:211–224.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Mello NK,
    2. Mendelson JH,
    3. Bree MP, and
    4. Lukas SE
    (1989) Buprenorphine suppresses cocaine self-administration in rhesus monkeys. NIDA Res Monogr 95:333–334.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Montoya ID,
    2. Gorelick DA,
    3. Preston KL,
    4. Schroeder JR,
    5. Umbricht A,
    6. Cheskin LJ,
    7. Lange WR,
    8. Contoreggi C,
    9. Johnson RE, and
    10. Fudala PJ
    (2004) Randomized trial of buprenorphine for treatment of concurrent opiate and cocaine dependence. Clin Pharmacol Ther 75:34–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Murphy NP,
    2. Lee Y, and
    3. Maidment NT
    (1999) Orphanin FQ/nociceptin blocks acquisition of morphine place preference. Brain Res 832:168–170.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Nann-Vernotica E,
    2. Donny EC,
    3. Bigelow GE, and
    4. Walsh SL
    (2001) Repeated administration of the D1/5 antagonist ecopipam fails to attenuate the subjective effects of cocaine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 155:338–347.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Placenza FM,
    2. Rajabi H, and
    3. Stewart J
    (2008) Effects of chronic buprenorphine treatment on levels of nucleus accumbens glutamate and on the expression of cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 200:347–355.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Rutten K,
    2. De Vry J,
    3. Bruckmann W, and
    4. Tzschentke TM
    (2010) Effects of the NOP receptor agonist Ro65-6570 on the acquisition of opiate- and psychostimulant-induced conditioned place preference in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 645:119–126.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Sakoori K and
    2. Murphy NP
    (2004) Central administration of nociceptin/orphanin FQ blocks the acquisition of conditioned place preference to morphine and cocaine, but not conditioned place aversion to naloxone in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 172:129–136.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Sartor GC,
    2. Powell SK,
    3. Wiedner HJ,
    4. Wahlestedt C, and
    5. Brothers SP
    (2016) Nociceptin receptor activation does not alter acquisition, expression, extinction and reinstatement of conditioned cocaine preference in mice. Brain Res 1632:34–41.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Schunk S,
    2. Linz K,
    3. Hinze C,
    4. Frormann S,
    5. Oberbörsch S,
    6. Sundermann B,
    7. Zemolka S,
    8. Englberger W,
    9. Germann T,
    10. Christoph T, et al.
    (2014) Discovery of a potent analgesic NOP and opioid receptor agonist: cebranopadol. ACS Med Chem Lett 5:857–862.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Shoblock JR,
    2. Wichmann J, and
    3. Maidment NT
    (2005) The effect of a systemically active ORL-1 agonist, Ro 64-6198, on the acquisition, expression, extinction, and reinstatement of morphine conditioned place preference. Neuropharmacology 49:439–446.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Sorge RE,
    2. Rajabi H, and
    3. Stewart J
    (2005) Rats maintained chronically on buprenorphine show reduced heroin and cocaine seeking in tests of extinction and drug-induced reinstatement. Neuropsychopharmacology 30:1681–1692.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Sorge RE and
    2. Stewart J
    (2006a) The effects of chronic buprenorphine on intake of heroin and cocaine in rats and its effects on nucleus accumbens dopamine levels during self-administration. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 188:28–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Sorge RE and
    2. Stewart J
    (2006b) The effects of long-term chronic buprenorphine treatment on the locomotor and nucleus accumbens dopamine response to acute heroin and cocaine in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 84:300–305.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Spagnolo B,
    2. Calo G,
    3. Polgar WE,
    4. Jiang F,
    5. Olsen CM,
    6. Berzetei-Gurske I,
    7. Khroyan TV,
    8. Husbands SM,
    9. Lewis JW,
    10. Toll L, et al.
    (2008) Activities of mixed NOP and mu-opioid receptor ligands. Br J Pharmacol 153:609–619.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Spampinato S and
    2. Baiula M
    (2006) Agonist-regulated endocytosis and desensitization of the human nociceptin receptor. Neuroreport 17:173–177.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. Results from the 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Summary of National Findings. Rockville, MD: 2010. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, in Office of Applied Studies, NSDUH Series H-38A, HHS Publication No SMA 10-4586 Findings.
  52. ↵
    1. Toll L
    (2013) The use of bifunctional NOP/mu and NOP receptor selective compounds for the treatment of pain, drug abuse, and psychiatric disorders. Curr Pharm Des 19:7451–7460.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Tzschentke TM
    (1998) Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference paradigm: a comprehensive review of drug effects, recent progress and new issues. Prog Neurobiol 56:613–672.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Wee S,
    2. Vendruscolo LF,
    3. Misra KK,
    4. Schlosburg JE, and
    5. Koob GF
    (2012) A combination of buprenorphine and naltrexone blocks compulsive cocaine intake in rodents without producing dependence. Sci Transl Med 4:146ra110.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    1. Weiss F,
    2. Martin-Fardon R,
    3. Ciccocioppo R,
    4. Kerr TM,
    5. Smith DL, and
    6. Ben-Shahar O
    (2001) Enduring resistance to extinction of cocaine-seeking behavior induced by drug-related cues. Neuropsychopharmacology 25:361–372.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Wise RA
    (1996) Addictive drugs and brain stimulation reward. Annu Rev Neurosci 19:319–340.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics: 362 (3)
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Vol. 362, Issue 3
1 Sep 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cebranopadol Blocks the Escalation of Cocaine Intake and Conditioned Reinstatement of Cocaine Seeking in Rats
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleBehavioral Pharmacology

Cebranopadol Attenuates Cocaine-seeking Behavior

Giordano de Guglielmo, Alessandra Matzeu, Jenni Kononoff, Julia Mattioni, Rémi Martin-Fardon and Olivier George
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics September 1, 2017, 362 (3) 378-384; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.117.241042

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Research ArticleBehavioral Pharmacology

Cebranopadol Attenuates Cocaine-seeking Behavior

Giordano de Guglielmo, Alessandra Matzeu, Jenni Kononoff, Julia Mattioni, Rémi Martin-Fardon and Olivier George
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics September 1, 2017, 362 (3) 378-384; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.117.241042
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Author Contributions
    • Footnotes
    • Abbreviations
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Behavioral Battery for Testing Candidate Analgesics in Mice I
  • Behavioral Battery for Testing Candidate Analgesics II
  • MCAM Reverses and Prevents Fentanyl Ventilatory Depression
Show more Behavioral Pharmacology

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About JPET
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-0103 (Online)

Copyright © 2021 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics