Advertisement
Research ArticleNeuropharmacology

A G Protein-Biased Ligand at the μ-Opioid Receptor Is Potently Analgesic with Reduced Gastrointestinal and Respiratory Dysfunction Compared with Morphine

Scott M. DeWire, Dennis S. Yamashita, David H. Rominger, Guodong Liu, Conrad L. Cowan, Thomas M. Graczyk, Xiao-Tao Chen, Philip M. Pitis, Dimitar Gotchev, Catherine Yuan, Michael Koblish, Michael W. Lark and Jonathan D. Violin
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics March 2013, 344 (3) 708-717; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.112.201616

Abstract

The concept of ligand bias at G protein-coupled receptors broadens the possibilities for agonist activities and provides the opportunity to develop safer, more selective therapeutics. Morphine pharmacology in β-arrestin-2 knockout mice suggested that a ligand that promotes coupling of the μ-opioid receptor (MOR) to G proteins, but not β-arrestins, would result in higher analgesic efficacy, less gastrointestinal dysfunction, and less respiratory suppression than morphine. Here we report the discovery of TRV130 ([(3-methoxythiophen-2-yl)methyl]({2-[(9R)-9-(pyridin-2-yl)-6-oxaspiro[4.5]decan-9-yl]ethyl})amine), a novel MOR G protein-biased ligand. In cell-based assays, TRV130 elicits robust G protein signaling, with potency and efficacy similar to morphine, but with far less β-arrestin recruitment and receptor internalization. In mice and rats, TRV130 is potently analgesic while causing less gastrointestinal dysfunction and respiratory suppression than morphine at equianalgesic doses. TRV130 successfully translates evidence that analgesic and adverse MOR signaling pathways are distinct into a biased ligand with differentiated pharmacology. These preclinical data suggest that TRV130 may be a safer and more tolerable therapeutic for treating severe pain.

Introduction

Morphine is the archetypal opioid (Hamilton and Baskett, 2000) and is still considered a mainstay of analgesic therapy. It elicits analgesia by stimulating the μ-opioid receptor (MOR), a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) highly expressed in the central nervous system and gastrointenstinal tract. While extremely efficacious at relieving pain, opioids, as a class, also elicit a wide array of adverse events including respiratory suppression, sedation, and gastrointestinal dysfunction, including nausea, vomiting, and constipation. In addition, the euphoria and physical dependence associated with opioids can lead to abuse and addiction. Furthermore, patients can develop tolerance to opioid analgesia, necessitating dose escalation and risking worsening tolerability (Schneider and Kirsh, 2010). In the postoperative setting where opioids are widely used, nausea and vomiting delay recuperation and hospital discharge, as can opioid-induced constipation, especially in cases of postoperative ileus (Marderstein and Delaney, 2008). In addition, although opioid-induced respiratory suppression is rare, risk of its occurrence limits dosing (Dahan, 2007), contributing to the 29% of patients who report postoperative pain despite opioid use (Bostrom et al., 1997). In the outpatient settings of acute and chronic pain, the same array of undesirable pharmacologies exists. Constipation lowers the quality of life for over half of patients taking oxycodone for chronic pain (Anastassopoulos et al., 2011) and can be dose-limiting, as many patients would rather suffer reduced analgesia than continue opioid use and contend with serious gastrointestinal discomfort. Furthermore, respiratory suppression can be fatal in cases of overdose and is associated with nearly 15,000 deaths per year, a number that has escalated as opioid prescriptions have increased in recent years (Manchikanti et al., 2012).

These adverse pharmacologic responses are elicited by all marketed opioid analgesics and have long been considered an immutable feature of strong MOR agonists. In rodents, these effects are reversible by MOR antagonists and absent in MOR knockout animals (Matthes et al., 1996; Sora et al., 1997; Kieffer, 1999), indicating they are “on-target” and cannot be improved by increasing receptor selectivity. However, numerous studies have shown that not all downstream signaling activities of a GPCR act with parallel, equivalent efficacies (Kenakin, 2011). Indeed, signal selectivity at a receptor can be targeted pharmacologically; “biased ligands” stabilize conformations that preferentially couple the receptor to particular intracellular pathways without coupling to others (Kenakin, 2011; Rajagopal et al., 2011). In extreme cases, a biased ligand is equivalent to a full agonist reference compound for one pathway but is inert, or even displays inverse efficacy, in another pathway stimulated by the reference ligand. Such a ligand, in a physiologic setting of an endogenous circulating agonist, can stimulate some receptor responses while inhibiting others (Violin et al., 2010; Kenakin, 2011). GPCR ligand bias has been observed between a number of intracellular signaling pathways, including coupling to different Gα subunits (Spengler et al., 1993; Eason et al., 1994), and between G protein coupling and β-arrestin recruitment (Azzi et al., 2003; Gesty-Palmer et al., 2006; DeWire et al., 2007; Violin and Lefkowitz, 2007; Kim et al., 2008; Ma et al., 2009; Gesty-Palmer and Luttrell, 2011; Rosethorne and Charlton, 2011).

Evidence from knockout (KO) mice suggests that opioids signal through distinct MOR pathways, indicating that ligand bias might elicit differential MOR pharmacology. In β-arrestin-2 KO mice, morphine analgesia was enhanced and prolonged, with reduced desensitization, compared with morphine in wild type littermates (Bohn et al., 1999). Similar findings were noted in both mice and rats following injection of β-arrestin-2 interfering RNAs to specific brain regions (Li et al., 2009; Yang et al., 2011). In contrast, morphine-induced constipation and respiratory suppression were reduced in β-arrestin-2 KO mice versus wild type animals (Raehal et al., 2005). Thus at the MOR, β-arrestins serve as negative modulators of analgesia and positive modulators of some MOR-mediated adverse effects such as constipation, tolerance, and respiratory suppression. This is consistent with the understanding that β-arrestins not only desensitize a receptor’s G protein-mediated signaling but also stimulate distinct and independent cell-signaling outcomes (Wei et al., 2003; Rajagopal et al., 2006; Gesty-Palmer et al., 2009; Violin et al., 2010; Allen et al., 2011; DeWire and Violin, 2011; Audet et al., 2012).

It remains unclear if a G protein-biased ligand at the MOR can successfully recapitulate the improved profile of morphine in β-arrestin-2 KO mice. We sought to discover and characterize such a biased MOR ligand to test this possibility in hopes of developing a safer, better tolerated, and more efficacious opioid analgesic.

Materials and Methods

Drugs and Chemicals

TRV130 hydrochloride and trifluoroacetate were synthesized by the chemistry group of Trevena Inc. as described elsewhere (Yamashita et al., manuscript in preparation). [d-Ala2, NMe-Phe4, Gly-ol5]-enkephalin (DAMGO) and buprenorphine were purchased from Tocris (Bristol, UK). Fentanyl, morphine, naloxone, and oxycodone were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).

In Vivo Studies

Analgesia studies were performed at Trevena Inc. with either male C57BL/6J mice or male Sprague-Dawley rats (Hilltop Laboratory Animals, Inc., Scottsdale, PA) housed in standard conditions with a 12-hour light/dark cycle. Assays were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and were carried out in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals as adopted by the U.S. National Institutes of Health. Studies of respiratory suppression were performed at Calvert Laboratories (Scott Township, PA), and pharmacokinetics studies were performed at ChemPartner Co. (Shanghai, China), under protocols reviewed and approved by the respective Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees.

Cell Culture and Preparation

Human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293 cells stably transfected to overexpress β-arrestin-2 fused to a β-galactosidase fragment were purchased from DiscoveRx (PathHunter β-arrestin assay; DiscoveRx Corporation, Fremont, CA) and the human OPRM1 gene (NM_000914.3, encoding human MOR), mouse OPRM1 gene (NM_001039652.1, mouse MOR), rat OPRM1 gene (NM_001038597.2, rat MOR), dog OPRM1 gene (XM_003638781, dog MOR), human OPRD1 gene [NM_000911.3, human δ-opioid receptor (DOR)], human OPRK1 gene [NM_000912.3, human KOR (κ-opioid receptor)], and human OPRL1 gene [NM_182647.2, human nociceptin receptor (NOP)/ORL-1] receptors were fused to a complementary β-galactosidase fragment using the pCMV-ProLink plasmid purchased from DiscoveRx. Cells were grown in minimum Eagle’s medium with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 150 μg/l of neomycin and 150 μg/l of hygromycin.

β-Arrestin-2 Recruitment

The PathHunter enzyme complementation assay (DiscoveRx) was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and read for chemiluminescence on a PheraStar plate reader (BMG Labtech, Durham, NC). Briefly, when β-arrestin-2 translocates to active receptor, the complementary β-galactosidase fragments fused to receptor and β-arrestin interact to form a functional enzyme, which is detected by chemiluminescence. For all in vitro assays, data were normalized as a percentage of maximal assay responses, typically defined by DAMGO-stimulated activity in the MOR assays, unless indicated otherwise.

Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate Accumulation

Receptor G protein-mediated responses were determined by measuring changes in cAMP using the cAMP–homogenous time-resolved fluorescence kit (Cisbio, Codolet, France), using the same cell lines as used to measure β-arrestin recruitment. MOR, KOR, DOR, and NOP all couple to Gαi so G protein coupling was measured as inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation in the presence of 1.5 μM NKH-477 (water-soluble forskolin, Tocris catalog #1603) and 500 μM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX). cAMP accumulation assays were run in parallel with β-arrestin-2 recruitment, using the same cells, drug dilutions, and assay buffers [1% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), F12 Ham’s buffer] to ensure accurate assay-to-assay comparisons of data. Plates were read using a time-resolved fluorescence ratio (665 nm/620 nm) on a PheraStar plate reader.

Internalization Assay

The PathHunter GPCR internalization assay (DiscoveRx) was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, U2-osteosarcoma (U2-OS) cells stably expressing the human MOR with complementary pieces of β-galactosidase were genetically fused to the receptor and a component of the endocytic vesicle, respectively. When coexpressed, the two fusion proteins detect receptor localization to endosomes, detected by chemiluminescence.

Immunoblotting

HEK-293 cells stably expressing the human MOR were grown in minimum Eagle’s medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. After overnight serum starvation, cells were stimulated with 1 μM DAMGO, morphine, fentanyl, TRV130, or vehicle for 5 minutes. Lysates were fractionated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and immunoblotted with phospho-MOR serine 375 antibody per manufacturer’s instructions (Cell Signaling Technologies, Danvers, MA; catalog number 3451). The immunoreactive band for the MOR was visualized and quantified using GeneSnap and GeneTools software (Syngene USA, Frederick, MD).

Radioligand Binding Assays

Equilibrium binding of unlabeled compounds was measured by inhibition of radioligand binding ([3H]-diperenorphine) to HEK cell membranes expressing human MOR, KOR, and DOR. Unlabeled ligand and buffer (50 mM Hepes, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA and 0.05% bovine serum albumin, pH 7.2, at 23°C) containing radioligand were added to polypropylene 96-well plates (Costar Corp., Cambridge, MA). Assays were initiated by the addition of membrane (5–10 μg protein/well) suspension. The concentration of [3H]-diprenorphine (specific activity 50–52 Ci/mmol; PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Boston, MA), was 0.5–1 times the independently determined Kd. Compounds were diluted in DMSO and tested at a final concentration of 1% DMSO. Nonspecific binding was defined in the presence of 1 μM naloxone. Competition assays were performed at 23°C for 3–4 hours to allow adequate time for equilibrium binding. In all assays, total radioligand bound to the filter was less than 10% of the total radioligand added. The separation of bound from free radioligand was accomplished by rapid vacuum filtration of the incubation mixture over GF/B filter mats using a Brandel cell harvester (Brandel, Gaithersburg, MD). Filters were washed 2 times with 0.5 ml of ice-cold phosphate buffered saline pH 7.0 containing 0.01% Triton ×100. Radioactivity on the filters was quantified using a MicroBeta TriLux Liquid Scintillation Counter (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences). Further details are available in the Supplemental Methods.

Hot Plate Studies

The hot plate test is adapted from that described previously (Tyers, 1980). Male C57BL/6J mice (20–25 g) or male Sprague-Dawley rats (200–250 g) were acclimated to the vivarium for 48 hours. Animals were placed individually on a heated surface (56°C for mice, 52°C for rats) and the time interval (seconds) between placement and a shaking, licking, or tucking of the hind paw was recorded as the predrug latency response. This same procedure was repeated 30 minutes after s.c. administration of compound in 10% ethanol, 10% cremophor, 80% water (10/10/80). All compounds were administered s.c. in a volume of 1 ml/100 g, with volume adjustments made for mouse dosing. The cutoff time, designed to prevent injury to the animals, was 30 seconds (with vehicle latencies of approximately 5–10 seconds). The percent maximum possible antinociceptive effect [% maximum possible effect (MPE)] was determined using the formula:

Embedded Image(1)

We used the predrug latency of each animal and cutoff times as noted above. Experimenter was blind to the treatment of animals during behavioral observations. Further details are available in the Supplemental Methods.

Rat Tail-Flick Studies

The tail-flick assay is adapted from the procedure originally described by D’Amour and Smith (1941). In the present experiment, male Sprague-Dawley rats (200–250 g) acclimated to the vivarium for 48 hours prior to behavioral testing. On the day of testing, animals were randomly assigned to vehicle (10/10/80, as before), TRV130, or morphine treatment groups. All compounds were administered s.c. in a volume of 1 ml/kg. Experimenter was blind to the treatment of animals during behavioral observations. Prior to drug treatment, each animal was tested to determine the baseline response. Rats were gently restrained using a towel and the distal third of the tail was placed on the tail-flick apparatus (Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH), which was set at a temperature that would produce a consistent baseline response of 3–6 seconds. In this assay, the latency of the rat to withdraw the tail from the radiant thermal stimulus was recorded. After baseline testing, animals received a s.c. injection of vehicle or test compound. At 30 minutes postdrug, animals were retested. A cutoff time of 15 seconds was used to prevent injury to the animal. MPE was calculated as with hot plate.

Rat Incisional Pain Studies

Experiments were conducted in male Sprague-Dawley rats (200–250 g). Animals acclimated to the vivarium for 48 hour prior to surgery. The measurement of tactile sensitivity for the injured hindpaw was obtained using von Frey filaments and the up/down method previously described (Dixon, 1980; LaBuda and Little, 2005). Twenty-four hours after surgery, animals were randomly assigned to vehicle, TRV130, or morphine treatment groups. All compounds were administered i.v. as a bolus in the rat tail in a volume of 1 ml/kg (vehicle as before, 10/10/80). Allodynia was measured 30 minutes after drug administration.

Mouse Gastrointestinal Function Studies

Glass Bead Colonic Motility Assay.

Mice (male C57BL/6J, 20–25 g) were fasted overnight to afford an accurate measurement of colonic transit. Animals were allowed free access to water the night before the experiment. On the day of the experiment animals were weighed and compounds were administered as in the hot plate experiments 20 minutes before the insertion of a single 2-mm glass bead 2 cm into the distal colon of each mouse (Raehal et al., 2005). Time until bead expulsion was recorded with an assay maximum of 240 minutes (100% MPE).

Fecal Boli Assay.

Mice (male C57BL/6J, 20–25 g) were allowed access to food and water ad libitum. On the day of the experiment, animals were weighed and compounds were administered s.c. (as in hot plate studies), 20 minutes after animals were placed individually in a testing chamber. Fecal boli were removed from each animal’s test chamber and weighed hourly for four hours (Raehal et al., 2005). Because TRV130 had a weak effect in this assay, the Hill slope was fixed to 1.0 to allow curve fitting to determine the ED50. 100% MPE is defined in this assay as zero grams fecal boli production, and vehicle-treated animals define the 0% effect boundary.

Rat Blood Gas Studies

Briefly, respiratory suppression was determined using male Sprague-Dawley rats (200–250 g) surgically prepared with carotid artery catheters. Animals were administered either vehicle, TRV130 at doses of 0.3, 0.6, 1.2, and 2.4 mg/kg s.c. or morphine 3, 6, 12, and 24 mg/kg, s.c. in a volume of 2 ml/kg prepared in the same vehicle solution as was used as in the rat hot plate, tail-flick, and incisional pain assays. Arterial blood samples (approximately 0.5 ml/sample) were collected from the arterial catheter from all animals at predose, 5, 30, 120, and 240 minutes following dosing for pCO2, pO2 and pH measurement. Rats were observed for behavioral changes prior to dosing, and approximately 30 minutes, 2 and 4 hours postdose.

Pharmacokinetics

Plasma and brain levels of TRV130 were determined by ChemPartner after i.v. or s.c. (10/10/80 vehicle) dosing of the species listed in Table 2 by standard mass spectrometry bioanalytical methods. Brain levels of TRV130 were measured in mice. Over an 8-hour period, samples were taken at 0, 5, 15, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours in all species. Standard pharmacokinetic calculations were used to produce values in Table 2.

Quantification of Ligand Bias

We applied an “equiactive comparison” between signaling pathways previously described (Griffin et al., 2007; Rajagopal et al., 2011). Estimates of the intrinsic relative activity (RAi) for both the G protein (RAiG) or β-arrestin signaling (RAiβarr) pathways are calculated using eq. 2. The bias ratio for efficacy of G protein signaling versus β-arrestin is determined as the ratio of these intrinsic relative activities.

Embedded Image(2)

This method assumes that measured responses reflect ligand binding at equilibrium and that Hill slopes are 1.0; both of these assumptions are supported by the data presented here. In addition, we used the “equimolar” comparison of compound responses at the same ligand concentrations for both G protein and β-arrestin-2 pathways to qualitatively demonstrate bias (Rajagopal et al., 2011).

Statistics

Statistics were calculated using Prism version 5 (GraphPad Inc., San Diego, CA). Compound ED50 values were determined using a computer-assisted nonlinear regression analysis of the dose-response curve. We also measured one way analysis of variance using GraphPad Prism with a Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison posttest (GraphPad Software).

Results

TRV130 Is a G Protein-Biased Ligand at the MOR.

To identify G protein coupling-biased ligands of the human MOR (hMOR), we screened Trevena’s internal chemical library, measuring both G protein coupling (by inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation) and β-arrestin-2 recruitment to the hMOR (by enzyme complementation). Several active compounds in a related chemical series were identified and further optimized for potency, ligand bias, and selectivity, resulting in the discovery of [(3-methoxythiophen-2-yl)methyl]({2-[(9R)-9-(pyridin-2-yl)-6-oxaspiro[4.5]decan-9-yl]ethyl}2)amine (TRV130; depicted in Fig. 1). This compound shows no structural similarity to morphine, fentanyl, or other previously described MOR agonists.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Chemical structure for TRV130 ([(3-methoxythiophen-2-yl)methyl]({2-[(9R)-9-(pyridin-2-yl)-6-oxaspiro[4.5]decan-9-yl]ethyl})amine), a novel MOR G protein-biased ligand.

In HEK cells, TRV130 displays G protein-coupling efficacy comparable to morphine (71 and 92%, respectively, of the full agonist DAMGO) and higher potency than morphine (8 nM versus 50 nM), but TRV130 displays approximately 14% of the efficacy of morphine for β-arrestin-2 recruitment (Fig. 2). Morphine itself is a partial agonist in the β-arrestin-2 assay, as DAMGO has 8.8-fold higher efficacy and fentanyl has 4.8-fold higher efficacy than morphine (Supplemental Table 1). This is consistent with the potency and efficacy of morphine in a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer assay (Molinari et al., 2010). When we applied a mathematical model for the quantification of ligand bias, the ratio of intrinsic relative activities proposed by Ehlert and colleagues (Griffin et al., 2007) and later applied to G protein- versus β-arrestin-ligand bias (Rajagopal et al., 2011), we find TRV130 possesses approximately 3-fold preference for the G pathway over β-arrestin-2 relative to morphine and fentanyl (Supplemental Table 2). The low β-arrestin-2 efficacy of TRV130 leads to an uncertain EC50, precluding a statistical comparison of this bias; however, bias is also reflected qualitatively in an “equimolar” comparison of G protein and β-arrestin responses for TRV130 and morphine (Supplemental Fig. 6) (Rajagopal et al., 2011). Thus, TRV130 appears unique compared with widely used opioid analgesics: It is a strong agonist like morphine but fails to robustly engage β-arrestin-2 recruitment. Similar in vitro results for the potencies and efficacies of TRV130 with respect to this set of compounds were observed in G protein and β-arrestin-2 coupling assays for the mouse, rat, and dog MORs (Table 1). In addition, TRV130 bound with high affinity to human, mouse and rat MOR species orthologs (Table 1).

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

TRV130 is a potent G-protein biased ligand at the hMOR. Compared with (A) morphine, (B) TRV130 has similar G protein-coupling efficacy to morphine with reduced β-arrestin-2 recruitment. β-arrestin-2 recruitment was measured by chemiluminescent β-galactosidase activity (black), and G protein coupling was measured by inhibition of cAMP accumulation (orange), in HEK cells expressing human MOR. Data are means ± S.E., displayed as percentage of maximum morphine efficacy, for greater than 30 independent experiments.

View this table:
TABLE 1

MOR functional and binding specificity for TRV130

Potencies and efficacies were determined for the indicated MOR species orthologs. Efficacy values are calculated as percent of maximal response to morphine (h,r,m,d MOR), U69,593 (hKOR), and DPDPE (hDOR) (n > 10 independent experiments performed in duplicate) except dMOR (n = 3). Ki high and Ki low represent the high- and low-affinity binding component, respectively (n = 2–5 independent determinations).

In general, β-arrestins desensitize GPCRs to reduce G protein signaling while promoting receptor internalization and stimulating G protein-independent signaling (DeWire and Violin, 2011). In accord with its reduced efficacy for β-arrestin recruitment, TRV130 exhibited minimal receptor internalization in a highly sensitive enzyme complementation assay of receptor endocytosis (Fig. 3A). Morphine caused significant internalization of the MOR in this assay, at a level approximately 40% that of the maximal responses of fentanyl and DAMGO, consistent with modest ability of morphine to promote receptor internalization (Haberstock-Debic et al., 2005). Similarly, TRV130 caused significantly less receptor phosphorylation at serine 375 on the carboxy-terminal region of the MOR than did several other strong opioids (Fig. 3B). This again is consistent with the lack of β-arrestin engagement by TRV130, since carboxy-terminal receptor phosphorylation is a major driver of β-arrestin coupling to receptor (Tohgo et al., 2003). Interestingly, morphine was a full agonist for the phosphorylation of this serine on the receptor, consistent with literature reports (Doll et al., 2011), and further supporting that compared to morphine, TRV130 selectively fails to engage the G protein-coupled receptor kinase/β-arrestin/receptor internalization axis of receptor function.

Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

TRV130 exhibits reduced MOR internalization and phosphorylation. Compared with morphine, TRV130 exhibits (A) reduced receptor internalization (in an enzyme complementation assay) and (B) reduced MOR phosphorylation at serine 375. Equal protein amounts were loaded into each lane. For quantification, optical densities of total hMOR (S375) immunoreactive bands were measured, normalized to the background values, and expressed as percentages of controls. *P < 0.05 versus vehicle; †P < 0.05 versus morphine and data are means ± S.E. of two to five independent experiments.

Naloxone shifted the EC50 of TRV130-evoked G protein coupling in a concentration-dependent manner consistent with a competitive mechanism of action (Fig. 4A). Fitting the data to a modified Gaddum-Schild competitive interaction model (Lazareno and Birdsall, 1993; Lew and Angus, 1995) supported this conclusion. In the same manner, TRV130 competitively displaced the EC50 of DAMGO-stimulated β-arrestin-2 recruitment (Fig. 4B), again consistent with a competitive interaction and a binding site for TRV130 that is shared with classic opioid ligands. Consistent with this finding, kinetic radioligand binding studies revealed a residence time of approximately 2 minutes for TRV130 at the hMOR, which is similar to the residence times of morphine and fentanyl (Supplemental Table 3).

Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.

TRV130 competitively binds the hMOR. (A) Levels of cAMP inhibition were monitored after 30-minute incubation with indicated concentrations of TRV130 and naloxone. Naloxone competitively shifted the cAMP inhibition curve for TRV130 (Schild slope = 0.9 ± 0.07), with an apparent KB for naloxone of 6.6 nM. (B) Levels of β-arrestin-2 recruitment were monitored after 30-minute incubation with indicated concentrations of DAMGO and TRV130. TRV130 competitively shifted DAMGO-induced β-arrestin-2 recruitment (Schild slope = 1.2 ± 0.3 and an apparent KB = 20 nM). Insets (A) and (B), data were used to calculate dose ratios and KB values for naloxone and TRV130. The graphs are representative of two to five independent experiments performed in duplicate.

We also measured TRV130 activity at the human KOR, DOR, and NOP and found that the compound is remarkably selective for the hMOR (Table 1). TRV130 is approximately 400-fold selective for the MOR over the KOR, DOR, and NOP receptors in our cell-based assays. In contrast, morphine is only 10-fold selective for the MOR over the KOR and DOR opioid subtypes. In addition, TRV130 had more than 130-fold selectivity for the hMOR over human α2C, D2S, D3, 5-hydroxytryptamine 1a, and σ receptors in radioligand displacement studies, and weak binding (defined as < 50% inhibition of binding at 10 μM) to 120 other receptors, channels, and enzymes (Supplemental Table 4 and Supplemental Methods). Thus TRV130 is a potent, selective, and G protein-biased ligand of the MOR.

TRV130 Is a Rapid and Powerful Analgesic in Rats and Mice.

To assess the analgesic activity of TRV130, we ran a battery of assays in rodents. First, TRV130 was compared with morphine for antinociceptive activity in the 56°C hot plate assay in mice, which is sensitive only to highly efficacious analgesics like strong opioids, and involves both spinal and supraspinal responses (Le Bars et al., 2001). TRV130 displays an ED50 of 0.9 mg/kg and morphine displays an ED50 of 4.9 mg/kg, with both compounds showing maximal efficacy in the assay (Fig. 5A; Supplemental Table 5). TRV130 reached peak analgesia at 5 minutes compared with 30 minutes for morphine, but the duration of action for TRV130 and morphine were similar at approximately 90 minutes (Fig. 5B). TRV130 analgesia was also reversible in mice by administration of 3 mg/kg naloxone s.c. 15 minutes after TRV130 dosing (Supplemental Fig. 1), demonstrating that the observed analgesia is MOR-mediated, and also supported by the short residence time of TRV130 on the receptor (Supplemental Table 3). In rats, TRV130 was also robustly analgesic in several assays. In the rat 52°C hot plate, TRV130 was 10-fold more potent than morphine (ED50 of 0.32 and 3.2 mg/kg, respectively) (Fig. 6A; Supplemental Table 5). TRV130 showed similarly increased potency compared with morphine in the rat tail-flick model (Fig. 6B; Supplemental Table 5) and rat hindpaw incisional pain model (Fig. 6C).

Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.

TRV130 causes rapid analgesia in mice. (B) Time-course of TRV130 (1 mg/kg s.c.) and morphine (6 mg/kg s.c.) analgesia in the 56°C hot plate. Mice were injected s.c. with either TRV130 or morphine, and 5, 15, 30, 60, and 90 minutes later were subjected to a 56°C hot plate assay. (A) Mice were injected s.c. with either TRV130 (orange bars) or morphine (blue bars) at the indicated doses, and 30 minutes later were subjected to a 56°C hot plate assay. The % MPE was based on a 30-second assay cutoff. *P < 0.05 compared with vehicle-treated animals. #P < 0.05 compared to morphine-treated animals. Data are mean ± S.E. of 4–14 animals per group.

Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.

TRV130 is analgesic in rats. (A) Rats were injected s.c. with either TRV130 (orange bars) or morphine (blue bars) at the indicated doses, and 30 minutes later were subjected to a 52°C hot plate assay. The % MPE was based on a 30-second assay cutoff. (B) Rat tail-flick latencies were performed for TRV130 and morphine at indicated doses. Percent of maximum possible response (15-second cutoff) is plotted. (C) TRV130 and morphine are active in the rat hindpaw incisional pain model. Assay performed as described in the Materials and Methods section to generate incisional allodynia. Rats were injected i.v. with TRV130 or morphine at the indicated doses. von Frey fiber pressure measurements are plotted on the Y axis. *P < 0.05 compared with vehicle-treated animals. Data are mean ± S.E. of 4–14 animals per group.

These pharmacodynamic findings are consistent with the pharmacokinetics of TRV130, which shows rapid brain penetration (67% of plasma drug levels are achieved in brain samples, and peak brain exposure was observed at 15 minutes postdosing, unpublished data) and an exposure time-course similar to the analgesic time-course (Table 2). The pharmacokinetics of TRV130 after intravenous bolus in a variety of preclinical species showed relatively high volumes of distribution and largely monophasic clearance, similar to morphine (Table 2). This profile suggests TRV130 will be generally similar to medium-duration analgesics like morphine and hydromorphone, but with more rapid brain penetration consistent with the lipophilicity of TRV130, as reflected in calculated log P values (3.19 for TRV130 and 0.87 for morphine). Additionally, this profile suggests that TRV130 and morphine can be compared fairly in the rodent studies used here, some of which are time-sensitive. TRV130 showed extensive first pass metabolism and less than 6% oral availability in rats and mice (unpublished data).

View this table:
TABLE 2

Pharmacokinetics of TRV130 (i.v.) in mice, rats, dogs, and cynomolgus monkeys

TRV130 Possesses An Improved Therapeutic Index of Analgesia to Constipation Relative to Morphine in Mice.

The impact of TRV130 and morphine on gastrointestinal function was evaluated in the mouse glass bead expulsion assay of colonic motility (Fig. 7, blue curves; Supplemental Table 5) and fecal boli accumulation assay (Fig. 7, orange curves; Supplemental Table 5). These responses were then compared with the hot plate antinociceptive responses (Fig. 7, black curves). These models show that TRV130 causes less gastrointestinal dysfunction than morphine at equivalent analgesic doses. This difference is best reflected in the lack of gastrointestinal dysfunction at the subanalgesic dose of 0.3 mg/kg s.c. of TRV130, compared with marked dysfunction caused by morphine at the similarly subanalgesic dose of 1 mg/kg s.c. Similarly, at maximally analgesic doses of TRV130, colonic motility was still evident, whereas morphine at equivalently analgesic doses completely blocked gastrointestinal function (100% MPE). A similar improvement in gastrointestinal function was noted in the fecal boli accumulation assay (Fig. 7, orange curves) and the charcoal meal gastrointestinal transit test (Supplemental Fig. 2). Together, these data suggest that TRV130 may cause less opioid-induced constipation than morphine.

Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.

TRV130 causes less gastrointestinal dysfunction than morphine in mice. Mice were injected s.c. with either (A) morphine or (B) TRV130 at the indicated doses, and 30 minutes later were subjected to either a 56°C hot plate assay (black curves; data from Fig. 5), a glass bead colonic motility assay (blue curves), or a 4-hour fecal boli accumulation assay (orange curves). The % MPE was based on 30 seconds in the hot plate, the cutoff time of 4 hours of bead retention in the glass bead assay, and no fecal production over 4 hours. Data are mean ± S.E. of 4–12 animals per group.

TRV130 Shows an Improved Therapeutic Index of Analgesia to Respiratory Suppression Compared with Morphine in Rats.

Rats were used to compare TRV130 and morphine with respect to analgesia and respiratory suppression, because the larger blood volume of rats makes serial arterial blood gas measurement more feasible than in mice (Sahbaie et al., 2006). The equianalgesic doses of 3.0 mg/kg morphine and 0.3 mg/kg TRV130 were chosen, based on responses in the rat hot plate (Fig. 6A), tail-flick (Fig. 6B), and hindpaw incision assays (Fig. 6C), as a basis for comparing respiratory suppression at analgesic and supra-analgesic doses. Morphine caused a trend toward increasing pCO2 at 3.0 and 6.0 mg/kg (Fig. 8, A and B), and caused a statistically significant increase in pCO2 (greater than 50 mmHg, compared with 35–40 mm Hg at baseline and in vehicle-treated animals) at doses 4-fold and 8-fold over the hot plate ED50 (12 and 24 mg/kg) (Fig. 8, C and D). In contrast, TRV130 did not cause this severe level of respiratory suppression even at 8-fold over the equianalgesic dose (Fig. 8, C and D). This improved therapeutic index compared with the analgesic response is illustrated in Fig. 8, E and F, as hot plate responses (in black) and peak pCO2 measurements (in orange); hot plate response was chosen for this comparison as it, like respiratory depression, involves supraspinal processing. pO2 and pH measures largely paralleled the changes seen in pCO2 for both morphine and TRV130 (Supplemental Fig. 3). Behavioral notes during this study indicate that TRV130 was not nearly as sedative as morphine at equianalgesic doses, consistent with less CNS depression (Supplemental Fig. 4). These findings indicate that in rats, TRV130 has an increased therapeutic index for analgesia versus respiratory suppression and sedation.

Fig. 8.
Fig. 8.

TRV130 exhibits less respiratory suppression than morphine in rats. (A–D) Rats were injected s.c. with equianalgesic doses (and 2-, 4-, and 8-fold multiples of the equianalgesic doses) of TRV130 or morphine, and blood gas parameters including pCO2, pO2, and pH were monitored over a period of 4 hours. pCO2 values are shown; pO2 and pH are shown in Supplemental Fig. 3. (E and F) Rats were injected s.c. with the indicated doses of TRV130 or morphine and subjected to a 52°C hot plate test (as in Fig. 6A). Percent MPE (30-second cutoff) in the hot plate for each dose is plotted against the left Y axis. In orange, the peak pCO2 measurements for various doses from the experiment in (A) are plotted against the right Y axis to compare the analgesic and respiratory effects of these two compounds. Data are mean ± S.E. with n = 6 animals per group.

Discussion

The data presented here demonstrate that TRV130 is a novel MOR G protein-biased ligand. The unique in vitro and in vivo profile of TRV130 suggests that it may be possible to minimize on-target MOR-mediated adverse events, which could significantly improve opioid pain management. Furthermore, the recapitulation of morphine’s improved pharmacology in β-arrestin-2 KO mice by a ligand with reduced ability to engage β-arrestin-2 demonstrates that molecular dissection of receptor signaling pathways can translate to differentiated pharmacology of biased ligands. Mechanistically, this could be the result of either a) reduced stimulation of an active, constipating, and respiratory-suppressing signaling mechanism of β-arrestin, or b) selective amplification of the analgesic pathway, which may be more sensitive to the acute desensitization effects of β-arrestin than the respiratory or constipating signals. The former mechanism is supported by the reduced impact of morphine on gastrointestinal motility and respiration in β-arrestin-2 knockout mice compared with wild type mice (Raehal et al., 2005); the latter mechanism is supported by the increased antinociceptive efficacy of morphine in β-arrestin-2 knockout mice compared with wild type mice (Bohn et al., 1999). However, either mechanism could explain the observed improved therapeutic index for TRV130, and neither pharmacokinetics nor receptor selectivity seem likely contributors. At the molecular level, MOR G protein coupling leads to analgesia by activation of potassium channels and inhibition of calcium channels (Altier and Zamponi, 2004; Ocana et al., 2004), but further work will be required to clarify the specific intracellular signaling pathways downstream of β-arrestins that contribute to opioid responses in vivo. In addition, the recently published MOR crystal structure may permit investigation of how biased and unbiased ligands may engage different conformations of the MOR to support selective coupling to G proteins versus β-arrestins (Manglik et al., 2012).

TRV130 shows a differentiated profile compared with morphine in several cellular readouts including β-arrestin-2 recruitment, receptor phosphorylation, and receptor internalization. Morphine effects on these endpoints can be difficult to measure in low-sensitivity assays (Whistler and von Zastrow, 1998; Sternini et al., 2000), which sometimes require overexpressed G protein-coupled receptor kinase to amplify signal (Groer et al., 2007), but is clearly detectable in the more sensitive assays used here. The fact that morphine pharmacology is altered in β-arrestin-2 KO mice, despite no apparent changes in baseline function, suggests that β-arrestin-2 engagement by morphine is meaningful, and that the more sensitive in vitro assays are measuring relevant molecular pharmacology, even if morphine is a partial agonist with respect to higher efficacy drugs such as fentanyl. Importantly, morphine is not biased with respect to fentanyl in the model used here, whereas TRV130 is biased with respect to both fentanyl and morphine. This suggests that despite higher efficacy of fentanyl than morphine for both G protein and β-arrestin responses, morphine and fentanyl, unlike TRV130, do not display functional selectivity for β-arrestin engagement at equiactive concentrations.

Quantification of ligand bias is particularly useful in systems such as overexpressed MOR, where one pathway may be selectively amplified such that partial agonists appear as biased ligands. Here we have used the “equiactive comparison” approach (Griffin et al., 2007; Rajagopal et al., 2011), which calculates intrinsic relative activity for each downstream pathway. The model we used assumes that ligands are signaling from a state of equilibrium binding, and that dose-response curves show no cooperativity; the data presented here indicates that both of these assumptions appear reasonable for TRV130, morphine, and fentanyl. By this calculation, TRV130 is approximately 3-fold more biased toward G protein signaling than morphine and fentanyl (Supplemental Table 2).

The profile of TRV130 both in vitro and in vivo is inconsistent with functional selectivity arising from unbiased partial efficacy. In our assays, TRV130 shows robust, morphine-like G protein coupling, with efficacy of 83% of morphine, whereas the well-described partial agonist buprenorphine displays efficacy of only 52% of morphine (Supplemental Table 1). In vivo, buprenorphine behaves as a partial agonist in both the analgesia and colonic motility assays (Supplemental Fig. 5), except with more glass bead retention than analgesia. Morphine exhibits full efficacy in each of these two in vivo assays, and TRV130 has maximal efficacy for analgesia but only partial efficacy in the colonic motility and fecal production assays. This highlights the differentiation of TRV130 as a biased ligand from both a strong agonist and a partial agonist, and suggests that the functional selectivity of TRV130 in vivo does not arise from differential amplification of partial agonist signals.

The profile of TRV130 shown here, of robust analgesia with reduced CNS depression and reduced gastrointestinal dysfunction compared with morphine, should translate into an important improvement in the treatment of postoperative pain. In this setting, postoperative nausea and vomiting, constipation, and sedation caused by current opioids cause significant patient discomfort and can prolong hospital stay. The risk of respiratory suppression limits opioid dosing, leaving many patients in pain during recuperation (Dahan, 2007). Thus TRV130 may be a marked improvement over current opioids in postoperative care. These improvements could also hold great promise for chronic pain management, where constipation is a severe and often dose-limiting adverse event (Anastassopoulos et al., 2011). Chronic opioid use also increases the risk of opioid addiction and tolerance to the analgesic benefits (Schneider and Kirsh, 2010). While these facets of MOR pharmacology will be explored with TRV130 in future studies, several of the previous studies of morphine in β-arrestin-2 knockout mice suggest that TRV130 may have reduced potential for addiction and analgesic tolerance (Bohn et al., 2000; Bohn et al., 2003; Raehal and Bohn, 2011; Urs et al., 2011).

Based on the preclinical profile described here, TRV130 is now in clinical development for use as an intravenous analgesic alternative to morphine and fentanyl. Although rodent oral bioavailability of TRV130 is low, the potential for oral availability in higher species is still being explored. Based on preliminary data suggesting high skin-permeation, TRV130 is also being investigated for administration via a transdermal patch to treat chronic pain. If the differentiation versus morphine shown here successfully translates to humans, the improved therapeutic windows of analgesia to respiratory suppression and gastrointestinal effects could provide physicians a more tolerable analgesic with a higher margin of safety. This in turn would lead to more effective pain management. More broadly, this would represent the successful translation of selective signaling via ligand bias to improve the therapeutic profile of a GPCR-targeted drug. This strategy could potentially be applied to other GPCRs for which on-target adverse events limit therapeutic utility.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Ian James for critical reading of this manuscript.

Authorship Contributions

Participated in research design: DeWire, Yamashita, Rominger, Cowan, Graczyk, Koblish, Lark, Violin.

Conducted experiments: DeWire, Rominger, Graczyk, Koblish.

Contributed new reagents or analytic tools: Yamashita, Liu, Chen, Pitis, Gotchev, Yuan.

Performed data analysis: DeWire, Cowan, Rominger, Violin.

Wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript: DeWire, Yamashita, Rominger, Cowan, Lark, Violin.

Footnotes

Abbreviations

DAMGO
[d-Ala2, NMe-Phe4, Gly-ol5]-enkephalin
DMSO
dimethylsulfoxide
DOR
δ-opioid receptor
GPCR
G protein-coupled receptor
HEK
human embryonic kidney
hMOR, human μ-opioid receptor; IBMX
1-methyl-3-(2-methylpropyl)-7H-purine-2,6-dione
KO
knockout
KOR
κ-opioid receptor
MOR
μ-opioid receptor
MPE
maximum possible effect
NOP
nociceptin receptor (aka ORL-1)
RAi
intrinsic relative activity
TRV130
([(3-methoxythiophen-2-yl)methyl]({2-[(9R)-9-(pyridin-2-yl)-6-oxaspiro[4.5]decan-9-yl]ethyl})amine)
  • Received November 5, 2012.
  • Accepted January 7, 2013.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Allen JA,
    2. Yost JM,
    3. Setola V,
    4. Chen X,
    5. Sassano MF,
    6. Chen M,
    7. Peterson S,
    8. Yadav PN,
    9. Huang XP,
    10. Feng B,
    11. et al.
    (2011) Discovery of β-arrestin-biased dopamine D2 ligands for probing signal transduction pathways essential for antipsychotic efficacy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:18488–18493.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Altier C,
    2. Zamponi GW
    (2004) Targeting Ca2+ channels to treat pain: T-type versus N-type. Trends Pharmacol Sci 25:465–470.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Anastassopoulos KP,
    2. Chow W,
    3. Ackerman SJ,
    4. Tapia C,
    5. Benson C,
    6. Kim MS
    (2011) Oxycodone-related side effects: impact on degree of bother, adherence, pain relief, satisfaction, and quality of life. J Opioid Manag 7:203–215.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Audet N,
    2. Charfi I,
    3. Mnie-Filali O,
    4. Amraei M,
    5. Chabot-Doré AJ,
    6. Millecamps M,
    7. Stone LS,
    8. Pineyro G
    (2012) Differential association of receptor-Gβγ complexes with β-arrestin2 determines recycling bias and potential for tolerance of δ opioid receptor agonists. J Neurosci 32:4827–4840.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Azzi M,
    2. Charest PG,
    3. Angers S,
    4. Rousseau G,
    5. Kohout T,
    6. Bouvier M,
    7. Piñeyro G
    (2003) Beta-arrestin-mediated activation of MAPK by inverse agonists reveals distinct active conformations for G protein-coupled receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:11406–11411.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Bohn LM,
    2. Lefkowitz RJ,
    3. Gainetdinov RR,
    4. Peppel K,
    5. Caron MG,
    6. Lin FT
    (1999) Enhanced morphine analgesia in mice lacking beta-arrestin 2. Science 286:2495–2498.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Bohn LM,
    2. Gainetdinov RR,
    3. Lin FT,
    4. Lefkowitz RJ,
    5. Caron MG
    (2000) Mu-opioid receptor desensitization by beta-arrestin-2 determines morphine tolerance but not dependence. Nature 408:720–723.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Bohn LM,
    2. Gainetdinov RR,
    3. Sotnikova TD,
    4. Medvedev IO,
    5. Lefkowitz RJ,
    6. Dykstra LA,
    7. Caron MG
    (2003) Enhanced rewarding properties of morphine, but not cocaine, in beta(arrestin)-2 knock-out mice. J Neurosci 23:10265–10273.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Boström BM,
    2. Ramberg T,
    3. Davis BD,
    4. Fridlund B
    (1997) Survey of post-operative patients’ pain management. J Nurs Manag 5:341–349.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. D’Amour FE,
    2. Smith DL
    (1941) A method for determining loss of pain sensation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 72:74–79.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Dahan A
    (2007) Respiratory depression with opioids. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother 21:63–66.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. DeWire SM,
    2. Ahn S,
    3. Lefkowitz RJ,
    4. Shenoy SK
    (2007) Beta-arrestins and cell signaling. Annu Rev Physiol 69:483–510.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. DeWire SM,
    2. Violin JD
    (2011) Biased ligands for better cardiovascular drugs: dissecting G-protein-coupled receptor pharmacology. Circ Res 109:205–216.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Dixon WJ
    (1980) Efficient analysis of experimental observations. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 20:441–462.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Doll C,
    2. Konietzko J,
    3. Pöll F,
    4. Koch T,
    5. Höllt V,
    6. Schulz S
    (2011) Agonist-selective patterns of µ-opioid receptor phosphorylation revealed by phosphosite-specific antibodies. Br J Pharmacol 164:298–307.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Eason MG,
    2. Jacinto MT,
    3. Liggett SB
    (1994) Contribution of ligand structure to activation of alpha 2-adrenergic receptor subtype coupling to Gs. Mol Pharmacol 45:696–702.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  17. ↵
    1. Gesty-Palmer D,
    2. Chen M,
    3. Reiter E,
    4. Ahn S,
    5. Nelson CD,
    6. Wang S,
    7. Eckhardt AE,
    8. Cowan CL,
    9. Spurney RF,
    10. Luttrell LM,
    11. et al.
    (2006) Distinct beta-arrestin- and G protein-dependent pathways for parathyroid hormone receptor-stimulated ERK1/2 activation. J Biol Chem 281:10856–10864.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Gesty-Palmer D, Flannery P, Yuan L, Corsino L, Spurney R, Lefkowitz RJ and Luttrell LM (2009) A beta-arrestin-biased agonist of the parathyroid hormone receptor (PTH1R) promotes bone formation independent of G protein activation. Sci Transl Med 1:1ra1.
  19. ↵
    1. Gesty-Palmer D,
    2. Luttrell LM
    (2011) Refining efficacy: exploiting functional selectivity for drug discovery. Adv Pharmacol 62:79–107.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Griffin MT,
    2. Figueroa KW,
    3. Liller S,
    4. Ehlert FJ
    (2007) Estimation of agonist activity at G protein-coupled receptors: analysis of M2 muscarinic receptor signaling through Gi/o,Gs, and G15. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 321:1193–1207.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Groer CE,
    2. Tidgewell K,
    3. Moyer RA,
    4. Harding WW,
    5. Rothman RB,
    6. Prisinzano TE,
    7. Bohn LM
    (2007) An opioid agonist that does not induce mu-opioid receptor—arrestin interactions or receptor internalization. Mol Pharmacol 71:549–557.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Haberstock-Debic H,
    2. Kim KA,
    3. Yu YJ,
    4. von Zastrow M
    (2005) Morphine promotes rapid, arrestin-dependent endocytosis of mu-opioid receptors in striatal neurons. J Neurosci 25:7847–7857.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Hamilton GR,
    2. Baskett TF
    (2000) In the arms of Morpheus the development of morphine for postoperative pain relief. Can J Anaesth 47:367–374.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Kenakin T
    (2011) Functional selectivity and biased receptor signaling. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 336:296–302.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Kieffer BL
    (1999) Opioids: first lessons from knockout mice. Trends Pharmacol Sci 20:19–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Kim IM,
    2. Tilley DG,
    3. Chen J,
    4. Salazar NC,
    5. Whalen EJ,
    6. Violin JD,
    7. Rockman HA
    (2008) Beta-blockers alprenolol and carvedilol stimulate beta-arrestin-mediated EGFR transactivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:14555–14560.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. LaBuda CJ,
    2. Little PJ
    (2005) Pharmacological evaluation of the selective spinal nerve ligation model of neuropathic pain in the rat. J Neurosci Methods 144:175–181.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Lazareno S,
    2. Birdsall NJ
    (1993) Estimation of competitive antagonist affinity from functional inhibition curves using the Gaddum, Schild and Cheng-Prusoff equations. Br J Pharmacol 109:1110–1119.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Le Bars D,
    2. Gozariu M,
    3. Cadden SW
    (2001) Animal models of nociception. Pharmacol Rev 53:597–652.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Lew MJ,
    2. Angus JA
    (1995) Analysis of competitive agonist-antagonist interactions by nonlinear regression. Trends Pharmacol Sci 16:328–337.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Li Y,
    2. Liu X,
    3. Liu C,
    4. Kang J,
    5. Yang J,
    6. Pei G,
    7. Wu C
    (2009) Improvement of morphine-mediated analgesia by inhibition of beta-arrestin 2 expression in mice periaqueductal gray matter. Int J Mol Sci 10:954–963.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Ma L,
    2. Seager MA,
    3. Wittmann M,
    4. Jacobson M,
    5. Bickel D,
    6. Burno M,
    7. Jones K,
    8. Graufelds VK,
    9. Xu G,
    10. Pearson M,
    11. et al.
    (2009) Selective activation of the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor achieved by allosteric potentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:15950–15955.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Manchikanti L,
    2. Helm S 2nd.,
    3. Fellows B,
    4. Janata JW,
    5. Pampati V,
    6. Grider JS,
    7. Boswell MV
    (2012) Opioid epidemic in the United States. Pain Physician 15(3, Suppl)ES9–ES38.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Manglik A,
    2. Kruse AC,
    3. Kobilka TS,
    4. Thian FS,
    5. Mathiesen JM,
    6. Sunahara RK,
    7. Pardo L,
    8. Weis WI,
    9. Kobilka BK,
    10. Granier S
    (2012) Crystal structure of the µ-opioid receptor bound to a morphinan antagonist. Nature 485:321–326.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Marderstein EL,
    2. Delaney CP
    (2008) Management of postoperative ileus: focus on alvimopan. Ther Clin Risk Manag 4:965–973.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Matthes HW,
    2. Maldonado R,
    3. Simonin F,
    4. Valverde O,
    5. Slowe S,
    6. Kitchen I,
    7. Befort K,
    8. Dierich A,
    9. Le Meur M,
    10. Dollé P,
    11. et al.
    (1996) Loss of morphine-induced analgesia, reward effect and withdrawal symptoms in mice lacking the mu-opioid-receptor gene. Nature 383:819–823.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Molinari P,
    2. Vezzi V,
    3. Sbraccia M,
    4. Grò C,
    5. Riitano D,
    6. Ambrosio C,
    7. Casella I,
    8. Costa T
    (2010) Morphine-like opiates selectively antagonize receptor-arrestin interactions. J Biol Chem 285:12522–12535.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Ocaña M,
    2. Cendán CM,
    3. Cobos EJ,
    4. Entrena JM,
    5. Baeyens JM
    (2004) Potassium channels and pain: present realities and future opportunities. Eur J Pharmacol 500:203–219.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Raehal KM,
    2. Walker JK,
    3. Bohn LM
    (2005) Morphine side effects in beta-arrestin 2 knockout mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 314:1195–1201.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Raehal KM,
    2. Bohn LM
    (2011) The role of beta-arrestin2 in the severity of antinociceptive tolerance and physical dependence induced by different opioid pain therapeutics. Neuropharmacology 60:58–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Rajagopal K,
    2. Whalen EJ,
    3. Violin JD,
    4. Stiber JA,
    5. Rosenberg PB,
    6. Premont RT,
    7. Coffman TM,
    8. Rockman HA,
    9. Lefkowitz RJ
    (2006) Beta-arrestin2-mediated inotropic effects of the angiotensin II type 1A receptor in isolated cardiac myocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:16284–16289.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Rajagopal S,
    2. Ahn S,
    3. Rominger DH,
    4. Gowen-MacDonald W,
    5. Lam CM,
    6. Dewire SM,
    7. Violin JD,
    8. Lefkowitz RJ
    (2011) Quantifying ligand bias at seven-transmembrane receptors. Mol Pharmacol 80:367–377.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. Rosethorne EM,
    2. Charlton SJ
    (2011) Agonist-biased signaling at the histamine H4 receptor: JNJ7777120 recruits β-arrestin without activating G proteins. Mol Pharmacol 79:749–757.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Sahbaie P,
    2. Modanlou S,
    3. Gharagozlou P,
    4. Clark JD,
    5. Lameh J,
    6. Delorey TM
    (2006) Transcutaneous blood gas CO2 monitoring of induced ventilatory depression in mice. Anesth Analg 103:620–625.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Schneider JP,
    2. Kirsh KL
    (2010) Defining clinical issues around tolerance, hyperalgesia, and addiction: a quantitative and qualitative outcome study of long-term opioid dosing in a chronic pain practice. J Opioid Manag 6:385–395.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Sora I,
    2. Takahashi N,
    3. Funada M,
    4. Ujike H,
    5. Revay RS,
    6. Donovan DM,
    7. Miner LL,
    8. Uhl GR
    (1997) Opiate receptor knockout mice define mu receptor roles in endogenous nociceptive responses and morphine-induced analgesia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:1544–1549.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Spengler D,
    2. Waeber C,
    3. Pantaloni C,
    4. Holsboer F,
    5. Bockaert J,
    6. Seeburg PH,
    7. Journot L
    (1993) Differential signal transduction by five splice variants of the PACAP receptor. Nature 365:170–175.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Sternini C,
    2. Brecha NC,
    3. Minnis J,
    4. D’Agostino G,
    5. Balestra B,
    6. Fiori E,
    7. Tonini M
    (2000) Role of agonist-dependent receptor internalization in the regulation of mu opioid receptors. Neuroscience 98:233–241.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Tohgo A,
    2. Choy EW,
    3. Gesty-Palmer D,
    4. Pierce KL,
    5. Laporte S,
    6. Oakley RH,
    7. Caron MG,
    8. Lefkowitz RJ,
    9. Luttrell LM
    (2003) The stability of the G protein-coupled receptor-beta-arrestin interaction determines the mechanism and functional consequence of ERK activation. J Biol Chem 278:6258–6267.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. Tyers MB
    (1980) A classification of opiate receptors that mediate antinociception in animals. Br J Pharmacol 69:503–512.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Urs NM,
    2. Daigle TL,
    3. Caron MG
    (2011) A dopamine D1 receptor-dependent β-arrestin signaling complex potentially regulates morphine-induced psychomotor activation but not reward in mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 36:551–558.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Violin JD,
    2. Lefkowitz RJ
    (2007) Beta-arrestin-biased ligands at seven-transmembrane receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci 28:416–422.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Violin JD,
    2. DeWire SM,
    3. Yamashita D,
    4. Rominger DH,
    5. Nguyen L,
    6. Schiller K,
    7. Whalen EJ,
    8. Gowen M,
    9. Lark MW
    (2010) Selectively engaging β-arrestins at the angiotensin II type 1 receptor reduces blood pressure and increases cardiac performance. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 335:572–579.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. ↵
    1. Wei H,
    2. Ahn S,
    3. Shenoy SK,
    4. Karnik SS,
    5. Hunyady L,
    6. Luttrell LM,
    7. Lefkowitz RJ
    (2003) Independent beta-arrestin 2 and G protein-mediated pathways for angiotensin II activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:10782–10787.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    1. Whistler JL,
    2. von Zastrow M
    (1998) Morphine-activated opioid receptors elude desensitization by beta-arrestin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:9914–9919.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    1. Yang CH,
    2. Huang HW,
    3. Chen KH,
    4. Chen YS,
    5. Sheen-Chen SM,
    6. Lin CR
    (2011) Antinociceptive potentiation and attenuation of tolerance by intrathecal β-arrestin 2 small interfering RNA in rats. Br J Anaesth 107:774–781.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools

Research ArticleNeuropharmacology

TRV130: A μ-Opioid Receptor-Biased Ligand

Scott M. DeWire, Dennis S. Yamashita, David H. Rominger, Guodong Liu, Conrad L. Cowan, Thomas M. Graczyk, Xiao-Tao Chen, Philip M. Pitis, Dimitar Gotchev, Catherine Yuan, Michael Koblish, Michael W. Lark and Jonathan D. Violin
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics March 1, 2013, 344 (3) 708-717; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.112.201616
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Advertisement