Advertisement
Research ArticleDrug Discovery and Translational Medicine

Differential Effects of Selexipag and Prostacyclin Analogs in Rat Pulmonary Artery

Keith Morrison, Rolf Studer, Roland Ernst, Franck Haag, Katalin Kauser and Martine Clozel
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics December 2012, 343 (3) 547-555; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.112.197152

Abstract

{4-[(5,6-Diphenylpyrazin-2-yl)(isopropyl)amino]butoxy}acetic acid (ACT-333679) is the main metabolite of the selective prostacyclin (PGI2) receptor (IP receptor) agonist selexipag. The goal of this study was to determine the influence of IP receptor selectivity on the vasorelaxant efficacy of ACT-333679 and the PGI2 analog treprostinil in pulmonary artery under conditions associated with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Selexipag and ACT-333679 evoked full relaxation of pulmonary artery from control and monocrotaline (MCT)-PAH rats, and ACT-333679 relaxed normal pulmonary artery contracted with either endothelin-1 (ET-1) or phenylephrine. In contrast, treprostinil evoked weaker relaxation than ACT-333679 of control pulmonary artery and failed to induce relaxation of pulmonary artery from MCT-PAH rats. Treprostinil did not evoke relaxation of normal pulmonary artery contracted with either ET-1 or phenylephrine. Expression of prostaglandin E3 (EP3) receptor mRNA was increased in pulmonary artery from MCT-PAH rats. In contraction experiments, the selective EP3 receptor agonist sulprostone evoked significantly greater contraction of pulmonary artery from MCT-PAH rats compared with control rats. The presence of a threshold concentration of ET-1 significantly augmented the contractile response to sulprostone in normal pulmonary artery. ACT-333679 did not evoke direct contraction of rat pulmonary artery, whereas treprostinil evoked concentration-dependent contraction that was inhibited by the EP3 receptor antagonist (2E)-3-(3′,4′-dichlorobiphenyl-2-yl)-N-(2-thienylsulfonyl)acrylamide. Antagonism of EP3 receptors also revealed a relaxant response to treprostinil in normal pulmonary artery contracted with ET-1. These data demonstrate that the relaxant efficacy of the selective IP receptor agonist selexipag and its metabolite ACT-333679 is not modified under conditions associated with PAH, whereas relaxation to treprostinil may be limited in the presence of mediators of disease.

Introduction

Selexipag [2-{4-[(5,6-diphenylpyrazin-2-yl)(isopropyl)amino]butoxy}-N-(methylsulfonyl)acetamide] is an orally available IP receptor agonist in clinical development for the treatment of PAH (Simonneau et al., 2012). Both selexipag and its active metabolite {4-[(5,6-diphenylpyrazin-2-yl)(isopropyl)amino]butoxy}acetic acid (ACT-333679) (previously known as MRE-269) possess high selectivity for the IP receptor over other prostanoid receptors and as such can be distinguished from PGI2 analogs currently used in the management of PAH (Kuwano et al., 2007). Progression of PAH is associated with reduced PGI2 production (Christman et al., 1992; Tuder et al., 1999), and restoration of IP receptor signaling using analogs of PGI2 is an effective strategy in the treatment of the disease (Gomberg-Maitland and Olschewski, 2008). Clinical efficacy and tolerability of PGI2 analogs, however, may be compromised by concomitant activation of other prostanoid receptors. The selectivity of PGI2 replacement therapies for the IP receptor, therefore, is emerging as an important consideration in the management of PAH. For example, vasorelaxation to iloprost and beraprost is attenuated in pulmonary artery from monocrotaline (MCT)-PAH rats (Kuwano et al., 2008) via a mechanism that involves coactivation of the contractile EP3 receptor. In contrast, ACT-333679 has at least 130-fold selectivity for the human IP receptor over other prostanoid receptors (Kuwano et al., 2007), and vasorelaxation of rat pulmonary artery evoked by ACT-333679 is not modulated by antagonism of EP3 receptors (Kuwano et al., 2008). Moreover, gastric side effects including cramping, nausea, and vomiting may develop via EP3 receptor-dependent mechanisms. Analogs of PGI2 contract gastric smooth muscle via the stimulation of EP3 receptors (Morrison et al., 2010). Activation of the EP3 receptor subtype mediates disruption of gastric contractility (Pal et al., 2007; Forrest et al., 2009) and underlies the development of emesis (Kan et al., 2002). Selexipag does not evoke gastric contraction or disrupt gastric function in the rat stomach (Morrison et al., 2010). A role for EP3 receptors has also been invoked in the development of peripheral pain reported in patients receiving treatment with PGI2 analogs (Minami et al., 2001; Southall and Vasko, 2001). Thus, the development of a selective IP receptor agonist that is devoid of off-target effects may provide improved efficacy and tolerability in patients with PAH.

Infusion of treprostinil via the subcutaneous or intravenous routes is effective in the clinical management of PAH (Simonneau et al., 2002; Tapson et al., 2006). In addition, treprostinil reduces pulmonary arterial pressure, as measured by right ventricular systolic pressure and total pulmonary vascular resistance in the rat MCT-PAH model (Yang et al., 2010), but the contribution of dilatation of the pulmonary artery to this effect is not clear. Little information on the direct vasorelaxant efficacy of treprostinil in pulmonary artery ex vivo is available.

The present study sought to determine the influence of IP receptor selectivity of ACT-333679 and treprostinil on vasorelaxation of the rat pulmonary artery under pathological conditions associated with PAH. Experiments were performed with pulmonary artery isolated from the rat MCT-PAH model. Although development of neointimal and plexiform lesions, which are characteristic of the human disease (Tuder et al., 2007), is not a feature of this rat model, pulmonary hypertension in MCT-PAH rats is associated with sustained pulmonary arterial vasoconstriction (Oka et al., 2008). The pulmonary artery isolated from this model provides a suitable functional system in which to evaluate vasorelaxant properties of test compounds. Dysfunction of both the ET-1 and adrenergic systems underlies the development of PAH (Salvi, 1999; Rubens et al., 2001), and circulating levels of ET-1 and catecholamines are significantly increased in the MCT rat model of PAH (Clozel et al., 2006). Thus, the current study measured the ability of ACT-333679 and treprostinil to relax pulmonary artery from MCT-PAH rats and control pulmonary artery precontracted with ET-1 or the α-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine. The expression levels of mRNA encoding prostanoid receptors in the MCT rat model of PAH were also analyzed to provide a molecular mechanistic explanation for potential differences in arterial reactivity to the test compounds.

The data presented here highlight the importance of IP receptor selectivity for full vasorelaxant efficacy of IP receptor agonists under pathological conditions associated with PAH. Selexipag and its active metabolite ACT-333679 exert full relaxant efficacy, whereas the ability of treprostinil to evoke pulmonary arterial vasorelaxation is significantly diminished in disease. The limited relaxant efficacy of treprostinil observed in this study may result from coactivation of contractile EP3 receptors, which are up-regulated in the MCT rat model of PAH. Potentiation of EP3 receptor-mediated contraction by subthreshold concentrations of pathological mediators (ET-1 and catecholamines) in control pulmonary arteries substantiates the impact of this contractile mechanism in disease development.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Male Wistar rats (12 weeks) were obtained from Harlan Laboratories B.V. (Venray, The Netherlands). All rats were housed in climate-controlled conditions with a 12-h light/dark cycle and had free access to normal pelleted rat chow and drinking water in accordance with local guidelines (Basel-Landschaft cantonal veterinary office). In certain experiments, PAH was induced in rats by a single injection of MCT (60 mg/kg i.p.). Vehicle control rats were treated in parallel. Disease was allowed to progress for 30 days before experimentation (Iglarz et al., 2008). Development of disease was confirmed by an increase in the weight of right ventricle [right ventricle/(left ventricle + septum) ratio]: control versus MCT-PAH, 0.33 ± 0.03 versus 0.81 ± 0.1 g; P < 0.05) and endothelial dysfunction as measured by attenuated relaxation to acetylcholine (pEC50 values: control versus MCT-PAH, 7.23 ± 0.04 versus 6.06 ± 0.13, P < 0.0001; Emax values: control versus MCT-PAH, 82.33 ± 1.73 versus 39.79 ± 5.26%, P < 0.0001).

Rat Isolated Pulmonary Artery

After euthanasia by CO2 asphyxiation, rings of extralobar pulmonary artery (EPA) and intralobar pulmonary artery (IPA) were prepared from rats using standard techniques. Two or four arterial rings, EPA (1.5 mm) and IPA (1.0 mm), respectively, were prepared from each animal. Vessels were suspended between stainless wires in either a standard tissue bath set-up (EPA) or a Mulvany-Halpern myograph system (IPA) containing modified Krebs-Henseleit buffer (10 ml) of the following composition: 115 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 1.5 mM KH2PO4, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 25 mM NaHCO3, and 10 mM glucose. Care was taken to avoid damage to the endothelium during the preparation of the arterial rings. In certain experiments, the vascular endothelium was removed by abrasion with the tip of a watchmaker's forceps. Bathing solution was maintained at 37°C and aerated with 95% O2/5% CO2, pH 7.4. An initial resting force of 4.9 mN (EPA) or 3.9 mN (IPA) was applied to vessels, and changes in force generation were measured by using an isometric force recorder (Multi Wire Myograph System, model 610 M, version 2.2; DMT A/S, Aarhus, Denmark) coupled to a EMKA data acquisition system (EMKA Technologies Inc., Paris, France). Viability of the pulmonary artery was tested by measuring contraction to KCl (60 mM), and the presence of a functional endothelium was confirmed by measuring the ability of acetylcholine 10−5 M to relax arterial rings contracted with phenylephrine (10−6 M; EPA) or 9,11-dideoxy-9α,11α-methanoepoxy prostaglandin F2α (U46619) (10−6 M; IPA).

Experimental Protocols

Relaxation of Pulmonary Artery from Control and MCT-PAH Rats.

Rings of pulmonary artery were contracted with prostaglandin F2α (10−5 M). When the developed force had stabilized, cumulative concentration-relaxation curves to selexipag, ACT-333679, beraprost, or treprostinil were obtained. The interval between additions of higher concentrations of compounds to the baths was determined by the time required for the response to reach plateau.

Relaxation of Pulmonary Artery Contracted with ET-1 or Phenylephrine.

Rings of EPA and IPA, in the presence or absence of endothelium, were contracted with either ET-1 (3 × 10−10 M) or phenylephrine (1–3 × 10−6 M) before cumulative concentration-relaxation curves to ACT-333679 and treprostinil were obtained.

Contraction of Pulmonary Artery.

Cumulative concentration-contraction curves to the EP3/EP1 receptor agonist sulprostone were obtained in the rings of EPA from control and MCT-PAH rats. Separate experiments measured the contractile responses of normal EPA and IPA to ACT-333679 and treprostinil. In experiments that sought to characterize the identity of the receptor mediating contraction to test compounds, rings of normal IPA were exposed to either drug vehicle or receptor antagonists for 20 min before cumulative concentration-response curves to agonists were obtained. The choices and concentrations of receptor antagonists were based on published data. The following receptor antagonists were used: (2E)-3-(3′,4′-dichlorobiphenyl-2-yl)-N-(2-thienylsulfonyl)acrylamide (DBTSA) (EP3 receptor; Gallant et al., 2002; Kuwano et al., 2008); 8-chloro-2-[3-[(2-furanylmethyl)thio]-1-oxopropyl]hydrazide, dibenz[b,f][1,4]oxazepine-10(11H)-carboxylic acid (SC51322) (EP1 receptor; McCormick et al., 2010), and (4Z)-7-[(1R,2R,3S,5S)-5-([1,1'-biphenyl]-4-ylmethoxy)-3-hydroxy-2-(1-piperidinyl)cyclopentyl]-4-heptenoic acid (GR32191B) (TP receptor; Lumley et al., 1989).

Measurement of Receptor mRNA Expression

Prostanoid receptor mRNA expression was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in arteries from normal and MCT-PAH Wistar rats. Analyses were performed by using the main, left, and right branches of the pulmonary artery. Total RNA was isolated from arteries (30-mg samples) by using the RNeasy micro fibrous tissue kit according to the manufacturer's protocol (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany). Remaining genomic DNA was digested by using the DNase free kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). The quantity of RNA was analyzed by using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), and RNA quality was assessed by using a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Total RNA was reverse-transcribed with a high-capacity cDNA archive kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Quantitative polymerase chain reaction was performed on an ABI 7500 machine using TaqMan probes (Applied Biosystems). The TaqMan assays from Applied Biosystems used for mRNA detection were IP-Rn01764022_m1, DP1-Rn04223963_g1, EP1-Rn01432713_s1, EP3-Rn0121735_m1; TP-Rn00690601_m1; 18s-4319413E, B2M-Rn00560865_m1 and GUS-Rn00566655_m1 were used for normalization. Results were calculated by using the ΔΔCt method, which allows comparison between gene expression values for different genes based on an identical linear scale. A value of 1 was defined as no expression. Final results are presented as the PAH/control rat ratio.

Materials

Selexipag, ACT-333679, and DBTSA were synthesized by Nippon Shinyaku Co. Ltd (Kyoto, Japan). Beraprost, treprostinil, SC51322, and sulprostone were obtained from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI). Acetylcholine, GR32191B, phenylephrine, prostaglandin F2α, and U46619 were purchased from Sigma (St Louis, MO).

Statistical Evaluation of Results

Responses of rat pulmonary artery to test compounds are expressed either as a percentage of the precontraction or the reference contraction to KCl (60 mM). Contraction to phenylephrine and ET-1 was measured in millinewtons. Results are presented as mean ± S.E.M. In some experiments, the S.E.M. values are smaller than the data symbol. n values refer to the number of animals. pEC50 values are defined as the negative logarithm of the concentration of agonist that evoked half-maximal response. The effects of receptor antagonists on responses of pulmonary artery to analogs of PGI2 were quantified by comparing calculated areas under the agonist concentration-response curves in the absence and presence of antagonists. Statistical comparisons between control and treated groups were performed by using either Student's paired t test or Student's unpaired t test (two-tailed). Significance was accepted at P < 0.05.

Results

Selexipag/ACT-333679, but Not Prostacyclin Analogs, Relax Pulmonary Artery from MCT-PAH Rats.

The abilities of selexipag, metabolite ACT-333679, and the analogs of prostacyclin, beraprost, and treprostinil to relax rat pulmonary artery were measured. Arterial rings from control and MCT-PAH rats were contracted to equal degrees with PGF2α (10−5 M) (control versus MCT-PAH; P > 0.05). Selexipag and ACT-333679 evoked concentration-dependent relaxation of EPA rings contracted with PGF2α (10−5 M). Relaxation was similar in EPA from control and MCT-PAH rats (Table 1; Fig. 1) (areas under curves, P > 0.05). Beraprost and treprostinil evoked concentration-dependent relaxation of control rat EPA, but Emax values were significantly less than that measured in response to selexipag and ACT-333679 (Table 1; Fig. 1). Likewise, relaxation of EPA from MCT-PAH rats to beraprost and treprostinil was significantly reduced compared with control EPA (Table 1; Fig. 1) (areas under curves: beraprost, P < 0.05; treprostinil, P < 0.0001). In particular, relaxation to treprostinil was abolished in EPA from MCT-PAH rats.

View this table:
TABLE 1

Summary of relaxation data for selexipag, ACT-333679, beraprost, and treprostinil in pulmonary artery from control and MCT-PAH rats

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Relaxation of pulmonary artery (EPA) from control and MCT-PAH rats to selexipag (A), ACT-333679 (B), beraprost (C), and treprostinil (D). Rings of EPA were contracted with PGF2α (10−5 M). Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 4).

ACT-333679, but Not Treprostinil, Relaxes Pulmonary Artery Contracted with ET-1.

ET-1 is a key mediator in the development of PAH (Rubens et al., 2001; Clozel et al., 2006). Thus, the ability of ACT-333679 and treprostinil to evoke vasorelaxation of pulmonary artery contracted with ET-1 was measured in both the presence and absence of functional endothelium. Rings of EPA and IPA from normal rats were contracted with ET-1 (3 × 10−10 M), and when tone had stabilized, cumulative concentration-response curves to ACT-333679 and treprostinil were obtained. Contraction to ET-1 was similar in the presence or absence of endothelium within each pulmonary artery group (Table 2). ACT-333679 evoked concentration-dependent relaxation of normal EPA and IPA rings (Table 3; Fig. 2). In contrast, treprostinil did not evoke relaxation of either EPA or IPA rings, even at the highest concentration tested (Table 3; Fig. 2). Removal of the endothelium did not influence the responsiveness of EPA and IPA rings to treprostinil. Removal of endothelial cells in IPA, however, caused a small, but statistically significant, decrease in the pEC50 value for ACT-333679 (Table 3).

View this table:
TABLE 2

Contraction of rat pulmonary artery to ET-1 and phenylephrine

View this table:
TABLE 3

Relaxant potency of ACT-333679 in rat pulmonary artery

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Relaxation of EPA (A and B) and IPA (C and D) in the presence (A and C) and absence (B and D) of endothelium to ACT-333679 and treprostinil. EPA and IPA were contracted with ET-1 (3 × 10−10 M). Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 4).

ACT-333679, but Not Treprostinil, Relaxes Pulmonary Artery Contracted with Phenylephrine.

Hyperactivation of the sympathetic nervous system is reported in PAH (Haneda et al., 1983; Salvi, 1999; Nagaya et al., 2000; Velez-Roa et al., 2004), and circulating levels of catecholamines are increased in the MCT model of PAH (Clozel et al., 2006). Vasorelaxation of EPA and IPA rings to ACT-333679 and treprostinil, in the presence and absence of endothelium, was therefore measured after contraction of rings with the α1-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine. ACT-333679 evoked concentration-dependent relaxation of normal EPA and IPA rings contracted with phenylephrine, whereas treprostinil did not evoke relaxation (Table 3; Fig. 3). Removal of the endothelium did not influence the responsiveness of EPA and IPA rings to treprostinil. A small, but statistically significant, decrease in the pEC50 value for ACT-333679 was measured upon removal of the endothelium in IPA (Table 3), but no significant differences in responses of IPA, with or without endothelium, were observed over the full range of concentrations tested (areas under curve: with and without endothelium, P > 0.05).

Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Relaxation of EPA (A and B) and IPA (C and D) in the presence (A and C) and absence (B and D) of endothelium to ACT-333679 and treprostinil. EPA and IPA were contracted with phenylephrine (1–3 × 10−6 M). Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 4).

Sulprostone Contracts Pulmonary Artery from Control and MCT-PAH Rats.

The potential role of EP3 receptors in modulating vasoreactivity of the pulmonary artery from MCT-induced PAH rats was investigated. First, the ability of the selective EP3 receptor agonist sulprostone to contract rat EPA from control and MCT-PAH rats was measured. Sulprostone evoked concentration-dependent contraction of EPA, which was significantly more pronounced in rings from MCT-PAH compared with control rats (Fig. 4) (Emax values control versus MCT-PAH: 62.7 ± 7.8 versus 168.5 ± 20.6%, P < 0.001).

Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.

Contraction of pulmonary artery (EPA) from control and MCT-PAH rats to sulprostone. Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 6).

Differential Expression of Prostanoid Receptors from Control and MCT-PAH Rats.

The expression profile of prostanoid receptors in pulmonary artery from control and MCT-PAH rats was measured (Fig. 5). TP and EP1 showed the highest basal expression, IP and EP3 showed moderate expression, and DP1 showed low expression (data not shown). mRNA that encoded the IP receptor was significantly increased in all segments of pulmonary artery analyzed from MCT-PAH rats (P < 0.01). Likewise, EP3 was significantly up-regulated in the main branch of MCT-PAH pulmonary artery (P < 0.05). In contrast, DP1 (P < 0.05), EP1 (P < 0.001), and TP (P < 0.01) were significantly down-regulated in arteries from MCT-PAH rats.

Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.

Expression of prostanoid receptors in pulmonary artery from control and MCT-PAH rats. Data are expressed as the PAH/control rat ratio (n = 6). S.E.M. values are omitted for clarity. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

Effect of Threshold Concentration of ET-1 on Contraction of Pulmonary Artery to Sulprostone.

Because the function of the EP3 receptor subtype seems to be increased in pulmonary artery from MCT-PAH rats, the influence of ET-1 on contraction of control pulmonary artery to sulprostone was measured. Sulprostone and ET-1 each evoked concentration-dependent contraction of rat EPA (Fig. 6; sulprostone: pEC50 5.0 ± 0.4, Emax 37.9 ± 8.3%; ET-1: pEC50 9.6 ± 0.09, Emax 131.9 ± 4.3%). Next, the effect of the threshold concentration of ET-1 on contraction of rat EPA to a threshold concentration of sulprostone was tested. Sulprostone (3 × 10−6 M) alone evoked a small contraction of rat EPA (3.9 ± 0.9%) (Fig. 6). Addition of sulprostone after an initial exposure of EPA to the threshold concentration of ET-1 (10−10 M, contraction 2.5 ± 0.6%) evoked a significantly greater contraction than that observed in the absence of ET-1 (66.0 ± 11.2%; P < 0.05) (Fig. 6). Similar data were obtained when sulprostone was combined with a threshold concentration of phenylephrine (10−8 M) in rat EPA (data not shown).

Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.

Contraction of rat pulmonary artery (EPA) to sulprostone and ET-1. A and B, concentration-dependent contraction of EPA to sulprostone (A) and ET-1 (B). C and D, representative traces of contractile responses of EPA to sulprostone (3 × 10−6 M) alone (C) or in combination with ET-1 (10−10 M) (D). E, quantification of contractile data shown in C and D. Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 4). *, P < 0.05.

EP1, EP3, and TP Receptors and Contraction of Pulmonary Artery from Control Rats.

Contraction of normal rat EPA and IPA to ACT-333679 and treprostinil was measured. ACT-333679 did not contract rings of pulmonary artery, whereas treprostinil evoked concentration-dependent contraction of both EPA and IPA. Contraction to treprostinil was more pronounced in IPA than in EPA rings (EPA: Emax 22.5 ± 5.8%; IPA: Emax 62.8 ± 11.9%) (Fig. 7). The EP3 receptor antagonist DBTSA (3 × 10−6 M) abolished contraction of rat IPA to treprostinil (Fig. 7). The EP1 receptor antagonist SC51322 (10−6 M) had no effect on contraction of IPA to treprostinil (control versus treated: pEC50, 4.8 ± 0.15 versus 4.8 ± 0.15, P > 0.05; Emax, 52.5 ± 5.5 versus 50.8 ± 5.6%, P > 0.05). Likewise, antagonism of TP receptors with GR32191B (10−6 M) did not significantly inhibit contraction to treprostinil (control versus treated: pEC50, 4.5 ± 0.4 versus 4.5 ± 0.3, P > 0.05; Emax, 34.8 ± 11.3 versus 22.0 ± 5.2%, P > 0.05).

Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.

Contraction of rat pulmonary artery to ACT-333679 and treprostinil. A and B, concentration-dependent contraction of EPA and IPA to ACT-333679 (A) and treprostinil (B). C, DBTSA (3 × 10−6 M) inhibits contraction of IPA to treprostinil. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 4). *, P < 0.05.

EP3 Receptors and Relaxation of IPA from Normal Rats.

The influence of DBTSA on the relaxant response of rat IPA to treprostinil was measured next. Rings of IPA, in the absence or presence of DBTSA, were contracted to the same level with ET-1 (control versus DBTSA groups, 3.08 ± 0.5 versus 2.8 ± 0.6 mN; P > 0.05). In the absence of DBTSA, treprostinil evoked minimal relaxation of IPA (Fig. 8). Antagonism of EP3 receptors with DBTSA, however, revealed a significant concentration-dependent relaxation of rat IPA to treprostinil (Fig. 8) (control versus treated: areas under curves, P < 0.05).

Fig. 8.
Fig. 8.

Effect of DBTSA (3 × 10−6 M) on relaxation of rat pulmonary artery (IPA, with endothelium) to treprostinil. IPA was contracted with ET-1 (3 × 10−10 M). Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 4).

Discussion

Selexipag and the active metabolite ACT-333679 can be distinguished from analogs of PGI2 based on vasorelaxant efficacy in the rat pulmonary artery. Specifically, both selexipag and ACT-333679, but not the PGI2 analog treprostinil, evoke concentration-dependent relaxation of pulmonary artery under pathological conditions associated with PAH. Increased expression of mRNA that encodes EP3 receptors and enhanced pharmacological activity of this receptor subtype are measured in pulmonary artery from the MCT rat model of PAH, but do not influence the relaxant efficacy of the selective IP receptor agonist ACT-333679. The limited vasorelaxant efficacy of treprostinil was partially restored after EP3 receptor blockade, indicating that coactivation of contractile EP3 receptors attenuates the relaxant action of treprostinil.

ACT-333679 is highly selective for the human IP receptor (Kuwano et al., 2007). The Ki value for ACT-333679 at the IP receptor was 130-fold lower than that at other prostanoid receptors. The affinity value for ACT-333679 at the rat IP receptor was 2.2 × 10−7 M and would be expected to activate IP receptors at the concentrations used in the current study. Treprostinil, however, is a nonselective agonist at prostanoid receptors (Whittle et al., 2012). In particular, treprostinil binds and activates DP1 and EP2 receptors in addition to the IP receptor. Treprostinil regulates macrophage function and promotes survival of bacteria via an EP2 receptor-dependent mechanism (Aronoff et al., 2007). In addition, treprostinil activates contractile EP3 receptors in gastric (Morrison et al., 2010) and vascular smooth muscle (Orie and Clapp, 2011).

The relaxant response to ACT-333679 was similar in pulmonary artery from control and MCT-PAH rats. These data confirm previous findings (Kuwano et al., 2008). In contrast, treprostinil evoked weaker relaxation than ACT-333679 in pulmonary artery from control rats and failed to relax pulmonary artery from MCT-PAH rats. Diminished relaxation of pulmonary artery from MCT-PAH rats to iloprost and beraprost has been reported (Kuwano et al., 2008), but treprostinil seems to be particularly sensitive to the pathological conditions associated with PAH. This possibility was further examined in experiments that measured the relaxant efficacy of ACT-333679 and treprostinil in pulmonary artery contracted with ET-1 or the α1-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine. Dysfunction of both the ET-1 and adrenergic systems underlie the progression of PAH (Salvi, 1999; Rubens et al., 2001), and circulating levels of ET-1 and catecholamines are significantly increased in the rat MCT-PAH model (Clozel et al., 2006). The relaxant profile of ACT-333679 and treprostinil was remarkably similar to that observed in MCT-PAH rats: ACT-333679 evoked concentration-dependent relaxation of all arterial rings tested, whereas treprostinil was unable to relax pulmonary artery contracted with ET-1 or phenylephrine.

Treprostinil can activate contractile EP3 receptors that counter the vasorelaxant properties of the drug (Orie and Clapp, 2011). Contraction evoked by the selective EP3 receptor agonist sulprostone (e.g., Dong et al., 1986) is significantly greater in pulmonary artery from MCT-PAH rats than in control rats and is consistent with previous findings (Kuwano et al., 2008). Hyper-responsiveness of the MCT-PAH pulmonary artery to sulprostone may reflect an increase in the number of EP3 receptors. Receptor density is a key determinant of both potency and efficacy of an agonist (Neubig et al., 2003). Molecular analyses of pulmonary artery from control and MCT-PAH rats revealed a modest, but statistically significant, up-regulation of the expression of mRNA encoding EP3 receptors in the disease condition. Thus, both expression and pharmacological activity of contractile EP3 receptors are enhanced in pulmonary artery from MCT-PAH rats. A differential regulation of IP and TP receptor mRNA expression was also noted: an up-regulation of IP receptor mRNA whereas down-regulation of mRNA encoding TP receptors was recorded. These data are suggestive of a pharmacological compensatory mechanism to combat disease progression through improved PGI2 signaling (IP receptor) and diminished deleterious effects of thromboxane A2 (TP receptor) (Christman et al., 1992; Tuder et al., 1999). Published information on the regulation of prostanoid receptors in PAH is, however, contradictory. Down-regulation in expression of IP receptors is reported in pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells cultured from MCT-PAH rats (Lai et al., 2008) and pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells and nondefined lung tissue from human patients with PAH (Lai et al., 2008; Falcetti et al., 2010). In contrast, a genomewide RNA expression study did not observe significant regulation of IP or EP3 receptor mRNA in lung tissue samples from patients with PAH (Rajkumar et al., 2010). Differences in the observations between studies may reflect the experimental approaches adopted. For example, in the present study receptor mRNA was measured in arterial blood vessels that were directly isolated from MCT-PAH rats. An additional cell culture stage was included in previous work and may have incurred changes in receptor expression (e.g., Boess et al., 2003). In addition, nonvascular components in snap-frozen lung tissue may have altered the receptor expression profile. Despite the variability of results, any potential changes in the expression of IP receptors should affect the interaction with selexipag and treprostinil equally, because both drugs bind the human IP receptor with similar affinity (Ki values, 2 × 10−8 and 3.2 × 10−8 M, respectively) (Kuwano et al., 2007; Whittle et al., 2012). Vascular responsiveness to a nonselective prostanoid receptor agonist, such as treprostinil, however, may be more susceptible to changes in the overall expression pattern and pharmacological activity of prostanoid receptors.

Increased pharmacological activity of the EP3 receptor was also evident in combination experiments that measured contraction to sulprostone and ET-1 or phenylephrine in pulmonary arteries isolated from control rats. Contraction of pulmonary artery to sulprostone was significantly augmented in the presence of a threshold concentration of ET-1 or phenylephrine and raises the possibility of a synergistic interaction between the EP3 and endothelin and adrenergic receptor systems. Contractile synergism between ET-1 and serotonin is reported in the human mammary artery (Yang et al., 1990), and significant synergy exists between the α-adrenoceptor and EP3 receptors in rat femoral artery (Hung et al., 2006). Coactivation of EP3 receptors under pathological conditions of PAH may limit the therapeutic efficacy of treprostinil. The current study and other work (Orie and Clapp, 2011) demonstrate a clear role for the EP3 receptor subtype in vasoconstriction to treprostinil. The beneficial effects of IP receptor signaling on vascular wall remodeling in PAH can potentially be tempered by excessive vasoconstriction. Indeed, the EP3 receptor mediates contraction of human pulmonary artery (Maddox et al., 1985; Haye-Legrand et al., 1987; Norel et al., 1991; Qian et al., 1994; Walch et al., 1999) and may modulate relaxant IP receptor function (Jones et al., 1997; Chan and Jones, 2004). In addition, EP3 receptor signaling is profibrotic (White et al., 2008; Bozyk and Moore, 2011; Harding and LaPointe, 2011) and may limit the beneficial effects of treprostinil in PAH.

Failure of treprostinil to evoke relaxation of the pulmonary artery from MCT-PAH rats may not be fully explained by the small down-regulation of mRNA encoding relaxant DP1 receptors in this model. A role for EP2 receptors can similarly be discounted because no change in the expression of mRNA encoding this receptor subtype is measured in MCT-PAH rats (Lai et al., 2008). Indeed, agonism at DP1 and EP2 receptors does not evoke relaxation of human pulmonary artery (Walch et al., 1999).

The vasorelaxant efficacy of ACT-333679 measured here in rat pulmonary artery ex vivo reflects the high selectivity of this compound for the relaxant IP receptor (Kuwano et al., 2007). Furthermore, vasorelaxation evoked by ACT-333679 under pathological conditions associated with PAH (absence of endothelium, ET-1, and α-adrenoceptor stimulation) supports the therapeutic profile of selexipag for the treatment of PAH. The combined vasodilator and antiproliferative properties of ACT-333679 (Kuwano et al., 2007, 2008) probably lead to the prolonged survival of MCT-PAH rats (Kuwano et al., 2008) and contribute to the significant decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance in patients with PAH (Simonneau et al., 2012). In contrast, the present data suggest that the therapeutic benefits of treprostinil in the management of PAH may not be attributed solely to direct vasodilatation. Indeed, only a small, but statistically significant, reduction in right ventricular systolic pressure is reported in the MCT-PAH rat (Yang et al., 2010). Infusion of treprostinil in a therapeutic regimen effectively prevents smooth muscle proliferation and progression of PAH in the rat MCT-PAH model (Yang et al., 2010), although the impact on survival is not reported. In addition, treprostinil exerts antiproliferative effects via an IP receptor-dependent mechanism in a recombinant cell system (Falcetti et al., 2007).

In conclusion, these data demonstrate that selexipag/ACT-333679 and treprostinil differ in their vasorelaxant effects in pulmonary artery. Selexipag/ACT-333679 relax pulmonary artery under conditions associated with PAH, whereas treprostinil fails to evoke relaxation. The relaxant efficacy of treprostinil depends on the nature of the agonist used to contract the pulmonary artery and is also attenuated by off-target agonism at EP3 receptors. Thus, a high degree of selectivity for the target IP receptor may help maintain therapeutic efficacy and minimize unwanted side effects of IP receptor agonists.

Authorship Contributions

Participated in research design: Morrison, Studer, Kauser, and Clozel.

Conducted experiments: Studer, Ernst, and Haag.

Performed data analysis: Morrison, Studer, Ernst, and Haag.

Wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript: Morrison, Studer, Kauser, and Clozel.

Acknowledgments

We thank Marie Schnoebelen for technical assistance.

Footnotes

  • Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://jpet.aspetjournals.org.

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/jpet.112.197152.

  • ABBREVIATIONS:

    PGI2
    prostacyclin
    IP receptor
    PGI2 receptor
    EP1 receptor
    prostaglandin E receptor 1
    EP3 receptor
    prostaglandin E receptor 3
    DP1 receptor
    prostaglandin D2 receptor 1
    TP receptor
    thromboxane A2 receptor
    EPA
    extralobar pulmonary artery
    ET-1
    endothelin-1
    IPA
    intralobar pulmonary artery
    MCT
    monocrotaline
    PAH
    pulmonary arterial hypertension
    PGF2α
    prostaglandin F2α
    ACT-333679
    {4-[(5,6-diphenylpyrazin-2-yl)(isopropyl)amino]butoxy}acetic acid
    DBTSA
    (2E)-3-(3′,4′-dichlorobiphenyl-2-yl)-N-(2-thienylsulfonyl)acrylamide
    SC51322
    8-chloro-2-[3-[(2-furanylmethyl)thio]-1-oxopropyl]hydrazide, dibenz[b,f][1,4]oxazepine-10(11H)-carboxylic acid
    GR32191B
    (4Z)-7-[(1R,2R,3S,5S)-5-([1,1′-biphenyl]-4-ylmethoxy)-3-hydroxy-2-(1-piperidinyl)cyclopentyl]-4-heptenoic acid
    U46619
    9,11-dideoxy-9α,11α-methanoepoxy prostaglandin F2α.

  • Received June 4, 2012.
  • Accepted August 22, 2012.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Aronoff DM,
    2. Peres CM,
    3. Serezani CH,
    4. Ballinger MN,
    5. Carstens JK,
    6. Coleman N,
    7. Moore BB,
    8. Peebles RS,
    9. Faccioli LH,
    10. Peters-Golden M
    (2007) Synthetic prostacyclin analogs differentially regulate macrophage function via distinct analog-receptor binding specificities. J Immunol 178:1628–1634.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Boess F,
    2. Kamber M,
    3. Romer S,
    4. Gasser R,
    5. Muller D,
    6. Albertini S,
    7. Suter L
    (2003) Gene expression in two hepatic cell lines, cultured primary hepatocytes, and liver slices compared to the in vivo liver gene expression in rats: possible implications for toxicogenomics use of in vitro systems. Toxicol Sci 73:386–402.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Bozyk PD,
    2. Moore BB
    (2011) Prostaglandin E2 and the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 45:445–452.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Chan KM,
    2. Jones RL
    (2004) Partial agonism of taprostene at prostanoid IP receptors in vascular preparations from guinea-pig, rat, and mouse. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 43:795–807.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Christman BW,
    2. McPherson CD,
    3. Newman JH,
    4. King GA,
    5. Bernard GR,
    6. Groves BM,
    7. Loyd JE
    (1992) An imbalance between the excretion of thromboxane and prostacyclin metabolites in pulmonary hypertension. N Engl J Med 327:70–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Clozel M,
    2. Hess P,
    3. Rey M,
    4. Iglarz M,
    5. Binkert C,
    6. Qiu C
    (2006) Bosentan, sildenafil, and their combination in the monocrotaline model of pulmonary hypertension in rats. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 231:967–973.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Dong YJ,
    2. Jones RL,
    3. Wilson NH
    (1986) Prostaglandin E receptor subtypes in smooth muscle: agonist activities of stable prostacyclin analogues. Br J Pharmacol 87:97–107.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Falcetti E,
    2. Flavell DM,
    3. Staels B,
    4. Tinker A,
    5. Haworth SG,
    6. Clapp LH
    (2007) IP receptor-dependent activation of PPARγ by stable prostacyclin analogues. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 360:821–827.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Falcetti E,
    2. Hall SM,
    3. Phillips PG,
    4. Patel J,
    5. Morrell NW,
    6. Haworth SG,
    7. Clapp LH
    (2010) Smooth muscle proliferation and role of the prostacyclin (IP) receptor in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 182:1161–1170.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Forrest AS,
    2. Hennig GW,
    3. Jokela-Willis S,
    4. Park CD,
    5. Sanders KM
    (2009) Prostaglandin regulation of gastric slow waves and peristalsis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 296:G1180–G1190.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Gallant M,
    2. Carrière MC,
    3. Chateauneuf A,
    4. Denis D,
    5. Gareau Y,
    6. Godbout C,
    7. Greig G,
    8. Juteau H,
    9. Lachance N,
    10. Lacombe P,
    11. et al
    . (2002) Structure-activity relationship of biaryl acylsulfonamide analogues on the human EP3 prostanoid receptor. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 12:2583–2586.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Gomberg-Maitland M,
    2. Olschewski H
    (2008) Prostacyclin therapies for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 31:891–901.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Haneda T,
    2. Nakajima T,
    3. Shirato K,
    4. Onodera S,
    5. Takishima T
    (1983) Effects of oxygen breathing on pulmonary vascular input impedance in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Chest 83:520–527.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Harding P,
    2. LaPointe MC
    (2011) Prostaglandin E2 increases cardiac fibroblast proliferation and increases cyclin D expression via EP1 receptor. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 84:147–152.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Haye-Legrand I,
    2. Bourdillat B,
    3. Labat C,
    4. Cerrina J,
    5. Norel X,
    6. Benveniste J,
    7. Brink C
    (1987) Relaxation of isolated human pulmonary muscle preparations with prostacyclin (PGI2) and its analogs. Prostaglandins 33:845–854.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Hung GH,
    2. Jones RL,
    3. Lam FF,
    4. Chan KM,
    5. Hidaka H,
    6. Suzuki M,
    7. Sasaki Y
    (2006) Investigation of the pronounced synergism between prostaglandin E2 and other constrictor agents on rat femoral artery. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 74:401–415.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Iglarz M,
    2. Binkert C,
    3. Morrison K,
    4. Fischli W,
    5. Gatfield J,
    6. Treiber A,
    7. Weller T,
    8. Bolli MH,
    9. Boss C,
    10. Buchmann S,
    11. et al
    . (2008) Pharmacology of macitentan, an orally active tissue-targeting dual endothelin receptor antagonist. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 327:736–745.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Jones RL,
    2. Qian YM,
    3. Wise H,
    4. Wong HN,
    5. Lam WL,
    6. Chan HW,
    7. Yim AP,
    8. Ho JK
    (1997) Relaxant actions of nonprostanoid prostacyclin mimetics on human pulmonary artery. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 29:525–535.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Kan KK,
    2. Jones RL,
    3. Ngan MP,
    4. Rudd JA
    (2002) Actions of prostanoids to induce emesis and defecation in the ferret. Eur J Pharmacol 453:299–308.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Kuwano K,
    2. Hashino A,
    3. Asaki T,
    4. Hamamoto T,
    5. Yamada T,
    6. Okubo K,
    7. Kuwabara K
    (2007) 2-{4-[(5,6-Diphenylpyrazin-2-yl)(isopropyl)amino]butoxy}-N-(methylsulfonyl)acetamide (NS-304), an orally available and long-acting prostacyclin receptor agonist prodrug. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 322:1181–1188.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Kuwano K,
    2. Hashino A,
    3. Noda K,
    4. Kosugi K,
    5. Kuwabara K
    (2008) A long-acting and highly selective prostacyclin receptor agonist prodrug, 2-{4-[(5,6-diphenylpyrazin-2-yl)(isopropyl)amino]butoxy}-N-(methylsulfonyl)acetamide (NS-304), ameliorates rat pulmonary hypertension with unique relaxant responses of its active form, {4-[(5,6-diphenylpyrazin-2-yl)(isopropyl)amino]butoxy} acetic acid (MRE-269), on rat pulmonary artery. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 326:691–699.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Lai YJ,
    2. Pullamsetti SS,
    3. Dony E,
    4. Weissmann N,
    5. Butrous G,
    6. Banat GA,
    7. Ghofrani HA,
    8. Seeger W,
    9. Grimminger F,
    10. Schermuly RT
    (2008) Role of the prostanoid EP4 receptor in iloprost-mediated vasodilatation in pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 178:188–196.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Lumley P,
    2. White BP,
    3. Humphrey PP
    (1989) GR32191, a highly potent and specific thromboxane A2 receptor blocking drug on platelets and vascular and airways smooth muscle in vitro. Br J Pharmacol 97:783–794.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Martyn Bailey J
    1. Maddox Y,
    2. Cunard CM,
    3. Shapiro R,
    4. Kawaguchi A,
    5. Goldman M,
    6. Lower RR,
    7. Ramwell PW
    (1985) A comparison of the contractile responses of rodent and human pulmonary vascular segments to Eicosanoids, in Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Lipoxins ( Martyn Bailey J ed) pp 267–272, Plenum Press, New York.
  25. ↵
    1. McCormick C,
    2. Jones RL,
    3. Kennedy S,
    4. Wadsworth RM
    (2010) Activation of prostanoid EP receptors by prostacyclin analogues in rabbit iliac artery: implications for anti-restenotic potential. Eur J Pharmacol 641:160–167.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Minami T,
    2. Nakano H,
    3. Kobayashi T,
    4. Sugimoto Y,
    5. Ushikubi F,
    6. Ichikawa A,
    7. Narumiya S,
    8. Ito S
    (2001) Characterization of EP receptor subtypes responsible for prostaglandin E2-induced pain responses by use of EP1 and EP3 receptor knockout mice. Br J Pharmacol 133:438–444.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Morrison K,
    2. Ernst R,
    3. Hess P,
    4. Studer R,
    5. Clozel M
    (2010) Selexipag: a selective prostacyclin receptor agonist that does not affect rat gastric function. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 335:249–255.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Nagaya N,
    2. Nishikimi T,
    3. Uematsu M,
    4. Satoh T,
    5. Kyotani S,
    6. Sakamaki F,
    7. Kakishita M,
    8. Fukushima K,
    9. Okano Y,
    10. Nakanishi N,
    11. et al
    . (2000) Plasma brain natriuretic peptide as a prognostic indicator in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Circulation 102:865–870.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Neubig RR,
    2. Spedding M,
    3. Kenakin T,
    4. Christopoulos A
    , International Union of Pharmacology Committee on Receptor Nomenclature and Drug Classification (2003) International Union of Pharmacology Committee on Receptor Nomenclature and Drug Classification. XXXVIII. Update on terms and symbols in quantitative pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev 55:597–606.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Norel X,
    2. Labat C,
    3. Gardiner PJ,
    4. Brink C
    (1991) Inhibitory effects of BAY u3405 on prostanoid-induced contractions in human isolated bronchial and pulmonary arterial muscle preparations. Br J Pharmacol 104:591–595.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Oka M,
    2. Fagan KA,
    3. Jones PL,
    4. McMurtry IF
    (2008) Therapeutic potential of RhoA/Rho kinase inhibitors in pulmonary hypertension. Br J Pharmacol 155:444–454.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Orie NN,
    2. Clapp LH
    (2011) Role of prostanoid IP and EP receptors in mediating vasorelaxant responses to PGI2 analogues in rat tail artery: evidence for Gi/o modulation via EP3 receptors. Eur J Pharmacol 654:258–265.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Pal A,
    2. Brasseur JG,
    3. Abrahamsson B
    (2007) A stomach road or “Magenstrasse” for gastric emptying. J Biomech 40:1202–1210.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Qian YM,
    2. Jones RL,
    3. Chan KM,
    4. Stock AI,
    5. Ho JK
    (1994) Potent contractile actions of prostanoid EP3-receptor agonists on human isolated pulmonary artery. Br J Pharmacol 113:369–374.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Rajkumar R,
    2. Konishi K,
    3. Richards TJ,
    4. Ishizawar DC,
    5. Wiechert AC,
    6. Kaminski N,
    7. Ahmad F
    (2010) Genomewide RNA expression profiling in lung identifies distinct signatures in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension and secondary pulmonary hypertension. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 298:H1235–H1248.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Rubens C,
    2. Ewert R,
    3. Halank M,
    4. Wensel R,
    5. Orzechowski HD,
    6. Schultheiss HP,
    7. Hoeffken G
    (2001) Big endothelin-1 and endothelin-1 plasma levels are correlated with the severity of primary pulmonary hypertension. Chest 120:1562–1569.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Salvi SS
    (1999) α1-Adrenergic hypothesis for pulmonary hypertension. Chest 115:1708–1719.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Simonneau G,
    2. Barst RJ,
    3. Galie N,
    4. Naeije R,
    5. Rich S,
    6. Bourge RC,
    7. Keogh A,
    8. Oudiz R,
    9. Frost A,
    10. Blackburn SD,
    11. et al
    . (2002) Continuous subcutaneous infusion of treprostinil, a prostacyclin analogue, in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 165:800–804.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Simonneau G,
    2. Torbicki A,
    3. Hoeper MM,
    4. Delcroix M,
    5. Karlócai K,
    6. Galiè N,
    7. Degano B,
    8. Bonderman D,
    9. Kurzyna M,
    10. Efficace M,
    11. et al
    . (2012) Selexipag, an oral, selective IP receptor agonist for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00137511.
  40. ↵
    1. Southall MD,
    2. Vasko MR
    (2001) Prostaglandin receptor subtypes, EP3C and EP4, mediate the prostaglandin E2-induced cAMP production and sensitization of sensory neurons. J Biol Chem 276:16083–16091.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Tapson VF,
    2. Gomberg-Maitland M,
    3. McLaughlin VV,
    4. Benza RL,
    5. Widlitz AC,
    6. Krichman A,
    7. Barst RJ
    (2006) Safety and efficacy of IV treprostinil for pulmonary arterial hypertension: a prospective, multicenter, open-label, 12-week trial. Chest 129:683–688.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Tuder RM,
    2. Cool CD,
    3. Geraci MW,
    4. Wang J,
    5. Abman SH,
    6. Wright L,
    7. Badesch D,
    8. Voelkel NF
    (1999) Prostacyclin synthase expression is decreased in lungs from patients with severe pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 159:1925–1932.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Tuder RM,
    2. Marecki JC,
    3. Richter A,
    4. Fijalkowska I,
    5. Flores S
    (2007) Pathology of pulmonary hypertension. Clin Chest Med 28:23–42, vii.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Velez-Roa S,
    2. Ciarka A,
    3. Najem B,
    4. Vachiery JL,
    5. Naeije R,
    6. van de Borne P
    (2004) Increased sympathetic nerve activity in pulmonary artery hypertension. Circulation 110:1308–1312.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Walch L,
    2. Labat C,
    3. Gascard JP,
    4. de Montpreville V,
    5. Brink C,
    6. Norel X
    (1999) Prostanoid receptors involved in the relaxation of human pulmonary vessels. Br J Pharmacol 126:859–866.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. White KE,
    2. Ding Q,
    3. Moore BB,
    4. Peters-Golden M,
    5. Ware LB,
    6. Matthay MA,
    7. Olman MA
    (2008) Prostaglandin E2 mediates IL-1β-related fibroblast mitogenic effects in acute lung injury through differential utilization of prostanoid receptors. J Immunol 180:637–646.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Whittle BJ,
    2. Silverstein AM,
    3. Mottola DM,
    4. Clapp LH
    (2012) Binding and activity of the prostacyclin receptor (IP) agonists, treprostinil and iloprost, at human prostanoid receptors: treprostinil is a potent DP1 and EP2 agonist. Biochem Pharmacol 84:68–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Yang J,
    2. Li X,
    3. Al-Lamki RS,
    4. Southwood M,
    5. Zhao J,
    6. Lever AM,
    7. Grimminger F,
    8. Schermuly RT,
    9. Morrell NW
    (2010) Smad-dependent and Smad-independent induction of id1 by prostacyclin analogues inhibits proliferation of pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells in vitro and in vivo. Circ Res 107:252–262.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Yang ZH,
    2. Richard V,
    3. von Segesser L,
    4. Bauer E,
    5. Stulz P,
    6. Turina M,
    7. Lüscher TF
    (1990) Threshold concentrations of endothelin-1 potentiate contractions to norepinephrine and serotonin in human arteries. A new mechanism of vasospasm? Circulation 82:188–195.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools

Research ArticleDrug Discovery and Translational Medicine

Selexipag and Rat Pulmonary Artery

Keith Morrison, Rolf Studer, Roland Ernst, Franck Haag, Katalin Kauser and Martine Clozel
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics December 1, 2012, 343 (3) 547-555; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.112.197152
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Advertisement