Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit jpet on Facebook
  • Follow jpet on Twitter
  • Follow jpet on LinkedIn
Research ArticlePERSPECTIVES IN PHARMACOLOGY

In Silico Predictions of Blood-Brain Barrier Penetration: Considerations to “Keep in Mind”

Jay T. Goodwin and David E. Clark
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics November 2005, 315 (2) 477-483; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.104.075705
Jay T. Goodwin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David E. Clark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Within drug discovery, it is desirable to determine whether a compound will penetrate and distribute within the central nervous system (CNS) with the requisite pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic performance required for a CNS target or if it will be excluded from the CNS, wherein potential toxicities would mitigate its applicability. A variety of in vivo and in vitro methods for assessing CNS penetration have therefore been developed and applied to advancing drug candidates with the desired properties. In silico methods to predict CNS penetration from chemical structures have been developed to address virtual screening and prospective design. In silico predictive methods are impacted by the quality, quantity, sources, and generation of the measured data available for model development. Key considerations for predictions of CNS penetration include the comparison of local (in chemistry space) versus global (more structurally diverse) models and where in the drug discovery process such models may be best deployed. Preference should also be given to in vitro and in vivo measurements of greater mechanistic clarity that better support the development of structure-property relationships. Although there are numerous statistical methods that have been brought to bear on the prediction of CNS penetration, a greater concern is that such models are appropriate for the quality of measured data available and are statistically validated. In addition, the assessment of prediction uncertainty and relevance of predictive models to structures of interest are critical. This article will address these key considerations for the development and application of in silico methods in drug discovery.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 Note that lipophilicity, as measured by octanol/water partitioning, is in fact a function of both hydrophobicity (cavity formation in solvent) and hydrogen-bond donor potential, as indicated by solvatochromic analysis (El Tayar et al., 1991). Hydrogen-bond potential, as represented by Δ log P [the difference in octanol/water and heptane (or isooctane)/water partitioning] is primarily a function of both hydrogen-bond acceptor and donor energetics, with minimal contribution from solute volume (or cavity formation).

  • Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://jpet.aspetjournals.org.

  • doi:10.1124/jpet.104.075705.

  • ABBREVIATIONS: CNS, central nervous system; BBB, blood-brain barrier; BB, blood (plasma)-brain partitioning; PS, permeability-surface area; ADMET, absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, toxicity; PSA, polar surface area.

    • Received January 18, 2005.
    • Accepted May 24, 2005.
  • The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
View Full Text

JPET articles become freely available 12 months after publication, and remain freely available for 5 years. 

Non-open access articles that fall outside this five year window are available only to institutional subscribers and current ASPET members, or through the article purchase feature at the bottom of the page. 

 

  • Click here for information on institutional subscriptions.
  • Click here for information on individual ASPET membership.

 

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics: 388 (3)
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Vol. 388, Issue 3
1 Mar 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Silico Predictions of Blood-Brain Barrier Penetration: Considerations to “Keep in Mind”
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticlePERSPECTIVES IN PHARMACOLOGY

In Silico Predictions of Blood-Brain Barrier Penetration: Considerations to “Keep in Mind”

Jay T. Goodwin and David E. Clark
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics November 1, 2005, 315 (2) 477-483; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.104.075705

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Research ArticlePERSPECTIVES IN PHARMACOLOGY

In Silico Predictions of Blood-Brain Barrier Penetration: Considerations to “Keep in Mind”

Jay T. Goodwin and David E. Clark
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics November 1, 2005, 315 (2) 477-483; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.104.075705
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Determinants of BBB Penetration
    • How Is BBB Permeation Measured?
    • Why Predict BBB Permeation?
    • A Bit of History
    • The State of the Art
    • Some Success Stories
    • Current Issues and Future Directions
    • Concluding Remarks
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Acute and Delayed Clinical Manifestations of OP Toxicity
  • Miltefosine as Mediator of the Immune Response
  • Histamine Receptor Knockout Mice
Show more Perspectives in Pharmacology

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About JPET
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-0103 (Online)

Copyright © 2024 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics