Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit jpet on Facebook
  • Follow jpet on Twitter
  • Follow jpet on LinkedIn
Research ArticleNEUROPHARMACOLOGY

Activation of G-Proteins by Morphine and Codeine Congeners: Insights to the Relevance of O- and N-Demethylated Metabolites at μ- and δ-Opioid Receptors

Chad M. Thompson, Heidi Wojno, Elisabeth Greiner, Everette L. May, Kenner C. Rice and Dana E. Selley
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics February 2004, 308 (2) 547-554; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.103.058602
Chad M. Thompson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heidi Wojno
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elisabeth Greiner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Everette L. May
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenner C. Rice
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dana E. Selley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Phenotypic differences in analgesic sensitivity to codeine (3-methoxymorphine) results from polymorphisms in cytochrome P450–2D6, which catalyzes O-demethylation of codeine to morphine. However, O-demethylation reportedly is not required for analgesic activity of the 7,8-saturated codeine congeners dihydrocodeine, hydrocodone, and oxycodone. This study determined the potency and efficacy of these compounds and their demethylated derivatives to stimulate μ- and δ-opioid receptor-mediated G-protein activation using agonist-stimulated guanosine 5′-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPγS) binding. Results showed that 7,8-saturated codeine congeners were more efficacious than codeine in activating μ-receptors, but only dihydrocodeine was more efficacious at δ-receptors. Hydrocodone and oxycodone were ∼10-fold more potent than codeine and dihydrocodeine at either receptor. Morphine-like compounds with a 3-hydroxy group were ∼30- to 100-fold more potent than their 3-methoxy analogs at the μ-receptor, and these compounds generally exhibited greater efficacy (e.g., morphine produced 2-fold greater maximal stimulation than codeine). Removal of the N-methyl group did not affect efficacy or potency of codeine congeners to activate μ-receptors, whereas this modification generally increased efficacy but decreased potency of morphine congeners. At the δ receptor, morphine congeners showed greater potency and structure-dependent differences in efficacy compared with codeine congeners, whereas removal of the N-methyl group had effects similar to those observed at the μ-receptor. These results demonstrate that 7,8-saturated codeine congeners are more efficacious than codeine, which may explain their lack of requirement for 3-O-demethylation in vivo. Nonetheless, because all 7,8-saturated codeine congeners were significantly less potent than their morphine derivatives, further research is needed to understand the relationship between metabolism and in vivo activity of these compounds.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by Grants DA-10770, DA-05274, DA-01647, and DA-07027 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse.

  • DOI: 10.1124/jpet.103.058602.

  • ABBREVIATIONS: PM, poor metabolizer; EM, extensive metabolizer; [35S]GTPγS, 5′-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate; P450, cytochrome P450; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; hMOR-CHO, Chinese hamster ovary K1 cells stably expressing the human μ-opioid receptor; DAMGO, [d-Ala2,N-MePhe4,Gly5-ol]enkephalin; ANOVA, analysis of variance; SNC-80, (+)-4-[(αR)-α-((2S,5R)-4-allyl-2,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-3-methoxy-benzyl]-N,N-diethyl-benzamide; Emax, efficacy.

    • Received August 15, 2003.
    • Accepted October 29, 2003.
  • The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
View Full Text

JPET articles become freely available 12 months after publication, and remain freely available for 5 years. 

Non-open access articles that fall outside this five year window are available only to institutional subscribers and current ASPET members, or through the article purchase feature at the bottom of the page. 

 

  • Click here for information on institutional subscriptions.
  • Click here for information on individual ASPET membership.

 

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics: 308 (2)
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Vol. 308, Issue 2
1 Feb 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Activation of G-Proteins by Morphine and Codeine Congeners: Insights to the Relevance of O- and N-Demethylated Metabolites at μ- and δ-Opioid Receptors
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleNEUROPHARMACOLOGY

Activation of G-Proteins by Morphine and Codeine Congeners: Insights to the Relevance of O- and N-Demethylated Metabolites at μ- and δ-Opioid Receptors

Chad M. Thompson, Heidi Wojno, Elisabeth Greiner, Everette L. May, Kenner C. Rice and Dana E. Selley
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics February 1, 2004, 308 (2) 547-554; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.103.058602

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Research ArticleNEUROPHARMACOLOGY

Activation of G-Proteins by Morphine and Codeine Congeners: Insights to the Relevance of O- and N-Demethylated Metabolites at μ- and δ-Opioid Receptors

Chad M. Thompson, Heidi Wojno, Elisabeth Greiner, Everette L. May, Kenner C. Rice and Dana E. Selley
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics February 1, 2004, 308 (2) 547-554; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.103.058602
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • KRM-II-81 Analogs
  • Substituted tryptamine activity at 5-HT receptors & SERT
  • In Vivo SRI-32743 Attenuates Tat Effects on Extracellular DA
Show more Neuropharmacology

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About JPET
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-0103 (Online)

Copyright © 2023 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics