Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit jpet on Facebook
  • Follow jpet on Twitter
  • Follow jpet on LinkedIn
Research ArticleBEHAVIORAL PHARMACOLOGY

Effects of γ-Hydroxybutyrate (GHB) on Schedule-Controlled Responding in Rats: Role of GHB and GABAB Receptors

Lawrence P. Carter, Huifang Wu, Weibin Chen, Christopher M. Cruz, R. J. Lamb, Wouter Koek, Andy Coop and Charles P. France
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics January 2004, 308 (1) 182-188; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.103.058909
Lawrence P. Carter
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Huifang Wu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Weibin Chen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher M. Cruz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. J. Lamb
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wouter Koek
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andy Coop
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles P. France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

γ-Hydroxybutyrate (GHB), a metabolite of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), is an increasingly popular drug of abuse and was recently approved for the treatment of narcolepsy (Xyrem). GHB and GABA receptors have been implicated in mediating effects of GHB; however, the relative importance of each of these receptors is unclear. This study evaluated the effects of selective antagonists in combination with GHB and related compounds on schedule-controlled responding. Eight male Sprague-Dawley rats responded under a fixed-ratio schedule of food presentation. Cumulative dose-effect curves were generated and ED50 values calculated to evaluate the relative potency at decreasing responding. The rank-order potency was as follows: diazepam = baclofen > γ-butyrolactone (GBL) > 1,4-butanediol (1,4-BDL) = GHB. All compounds decreased responding 20 min after administration. The duration of action of diazepam, GHB, and GBL was shorter than that of 1,4-BDL and baclofen. p-3-Aminopropyl-p-diethoxymethyl phosphinic acid (CGP 35348) antagonized the rate-decreasing effects of baclofen and not GHB; flumazenil antagonized the effects of diazepam and not GHB. The GHB receptor antagonist (2E)-(5-hydroxy-5,7,8,9-tetrahydro-6H-benzo[a][7]annulen-6-ylidene ethanoic acid (NCS-382) did not attenuate the rate-decreasing effects of GHB, baclofen, or diazepam; larger doses of NCS-382 further decreased rate of responding when given in combination with each of these compounds. These studies show that GBL, 1,4-BDL, and GHB differ significantly in potency and duration of action. The ability of CGP 35348 to antagonize the rate-decreasing effects of baclofen may be limited by the involvement of multiple GABAB receptor subtypes and the lack of antagonism of GHB by NCS-382 may be due to its own GHB-like effects.

Footnotes

  • These studies were supported by U.S. Public Health Service Grant DA14986 and Research Career Award Grant DA00211 (C.P.F.).

  • DOI: 10.1124/jpet.103.058909.

  • ABBREVIATIONS: GHB, γ-hydroxybutyrate; 1,4-BDL, 1,4-butanediol; GBL, γ-butyrolactone; CGP 35348, p-3-aminopropyl-p-diethoxymethyl phosphinic acid; NCS-382, (2E)-(5-hydroxy-5,7,8,9-tetrahydro-6H-benzo[a][7]annulen-6-ylidene ethanoic acid; FR, fixed ratio; ANOVA, analysis of variance; SCH 50911, [(2s)(+)-5,5-dimethyl-2-morpholineacetic acid].

    • Received August 20, 2003.
    • Accepted October 2, 2003.
  • The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
View Full Text

JPET articles become freely available 12 months after publication, and remain freely available for 5 years. 

Non-open access articles that fall outside this five year window are available only to institutional subscribers and current ASPET members, or through the article purchase feature at the bottom of the page. 

 

  • Click here for information on institutional subscriptions.
  • Click here for information on individual ASPET membership.

 

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics: 308 (1)
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Vol. 308, Issue 1
1 Jan 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effects of γ-Hydroxybutyrate (GHB) on Schedule-Controlled Responding in Rats: Role of GHB and GABAB Receptors
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleBEHAVIORAL PHARMACOLOGY

Effects of γ-Hydroxybutyrate (GHB) on Schedule-Controlled Responding in Rats: Role of GHB and GABAB Receptors

Lawrence P. Carter, Huifang Wu, Weibin Chen, Christopher M. Cruz, R. J. Lamb, Wouter Koek, Andy Coop and Charles P. France
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics January 1, 2004, 308 (1) 182-188; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.103.058909

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Research ArticleBEHAVIORAL PHARMACOLOGY

Effects of γ-Hydroxybutyrate (GHB) on Schedule-Controlled Responding in Rats: Role of GHB and GABAB Receptors

Lawrence P. Carter, Huifang Wu, Weibin Chen, Christopher M. Cruz, R. J. Lamb, Wouter Koek, Andy Coop and Charles P. France
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics January 1, 2004, 308 (1) 182-188; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.103.058909
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Daily methocinnamox on fentanyl self-administration
  • Abuse potential of botanical cannabidiol
  • Efficacy as a determinant of hyperlocomotion by MOR ligands
Show more Behavioral Pharmacology

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About JPET
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-0103 (Online)

Copyright © 2022 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics