Abstract
BIIL 284 is a new LTB4 receptor antagonist. It is a prodrug and has negligible binding to the LTB4 receptor. However, ubiquitous esterases metabolize BIIL 284 to the active metabolites BIIL 260 and BIIL 315, the glucuronidated form of BIIL 260. Both metabolites have high affinity to the LTB4 receptor on isolated human neutrophil cell membranes with Ki values of 1.7 and 1.9 nM, respectively. On vital human neutrophilic granulocytesKi was around 1 nM. BIIL 260 and BIIL 315 interact with the LTB4 receptor in a saturable, reversible, and competitive manner. BIIL 260 and its glucuronide BIIL 315 also potently inhibited LTB4-induced intracellular Ca2+ release in human neutrophils (IC50 values of 0.82 and 0.75 nM, respectively) as measured with Fura-2. High efficacy of BIIL 284 has been demonstrated in various in vivo models. BIIL 284 inhibited LTB4-induced mouse ear inflammation with ED50 = 0.008 mg/kg p.o., LTB4-induced transdermal chemotaxis in guinea pigs with ED50 = 0.03 mg/kg p.o., LTB4-induced neutropenia in various species (monkey: ED50 = 0.004 mg/kg p.o.), and LTB4-induced Mac1-expression in monkeys (ED50 = 0.05 mg/kg p.o. in Tylose). Full blockade of LTB4 receptors over 24 h was achieved by 0.3 mg/kg BIIL 284 after single oral dose as measured by LTB4-induced neutropenia or Mac1-expression in the monkey model. BIIL 284 is an unusually potent and long-acting orally active LTB4antagonist, and is therefore under clinical development as a novel anti-inflammatory principle.
Leukotriene B4 is a dihydroxy fatty acid formed from arachidonic acid by the 5-lipoxygenase pathway. The main biological functions of LTB4 are recruitment and activation of inflammatory cells, particularly neutrophils, but also macrophages, monocytes, eosinophils, and lymphocytes (Ford-Hutchinson, 1990). LTB4 also has an important role in controlling neutrophil apoptosis (Lee et al., 1999). LTB4 is produced mainly by macrophages and neutrophils (Hubbard et al., 1991), i.e., cell types that drive chronic inflammatory processes. LTB4 perpetuates its own production in an autocrine manner, a mechanism for perpetuating chronic inflammation (Serio et al., 1997).
In neutrophils, LTB4 exerts its effects of chemokinetic and chemotactic migration, adherence, degranulation, and superoxide production via binding to a specific LTB4 receptor BLTR (Yokomizo et al., 1997). Immediately after LTB4 binds to its receptor, intracellular Ca2+ levels increase but after some time these levels reverse. These calcium-transients are a very early indicator of neutrophil stimulation and a sensitive hallmark of cellular activation (Richter et al., 1990).
LTB4 furthermore increases vascular permeability and induces the expression of adhesion molecules, e.g., Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18) on polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNLs), as a prerequisite of PMNL adherence to endothelial cells (Morgan et al., 1995). Excessive LTB4-induced adherence of PMNLs can lead to neutropenia that provides a simple in vivo way of monitoring LTB4 receptor antagonism (Pellas et al., 1993). LTB4 can potentially contribute to accumulation not only of neutrophils but also of macrophages, T lymphocytes, and eosinophils at the site of inflammation. LTB4 has been suggested to be an important participant in the pathophysiology of inflammatory processes, especially in those where neutrophils play a major role. Such diseases include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, severe asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, and cystic fibrosis. However, a clinical proof for a crucial role of LTB4 requires the availability of a safe, specific, strong, and long-acting LTB4 antagonist for use in humans.
Here we describe the preclinical pharmacology of BIIL 284 (Fig.1) and compare it with the two standard LTB4 antagonists LY 293111 and CGS 25019 C previously described in the literature (Marder et al., 1995;Raychaudhuri et al., 1995; Sofia et al., 1997; Jackson, 1999).
Materials and Methods
Animals
The following strains of animals were used in these studies: beagle dogs, rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), Dunkin-Hartley/Pirbright-White guinea pigs (Interfauna, Tuttlingen, Germany), HsdWin:NMRI mice (Harlan-Winkelmann, Borchen, Germany), Chbb/Thom rats, and New Zealand White rabbits (bred in the laboratories of Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG, Biberach, Germany).
Chemicals
BIIL 284 BS, BIIL 260 CL, BIIL 315 ZW, CGS 25019 C, and LY 293111 were synthesized in the laboratories of Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG. Structures of Boehringer substances are shown in Fig. 1. LTB4 (free acid) was purchased from Paesel GmbH (Frankfurt, Germany). [5,6,8,9,11,12,14,15(n)-3H]Leukotriene B4, specific activity ca. 200 Ci/mmol, was purchased from Amersham Buchler (Braunschweig, Germany). All other chemicals and reagents were from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) or Serva (Heidelberg, Germany) unless otherwise specified in the methods.
Cell Line
U937, a monocyte/macrophage differentiated histiocytic cell line of human origin was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD) (accession number ATCC CRL 1593). U937 cells were routinely maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2, 95% air in RPMI-1640 cell culture medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Boehringer-Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany), 2 mM glutamine, and nonessential amino acids. Cultures were split and subcultured every 3 to 4 days to keep a cell density of between 0.3 × 106/ml and 1 × 106/ml.
For dimethyl sulfoxide differentiation, exponentially proliferating cells were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended at 0.3 × 106/ml in the medium specified above, additionally containing 1.25% (w/v) dimethyl sulfoxide. After 4 days the cells differentiated into a line with monocyte-like characteristics (Harris and Ralph, 1985).
Neutrophil Isolation
Human PMNLs were prepared from fresh peripheral blood samples from volunteers not receiving medication essentially as described byRoos and de Boer (1986). In brief, blood withdrawn with citric acid anticoagulant, was mixed 1:1 with a solution containing 140 mmol/l NaCl, 9.2 mmol/l Na2HPO4, 1.2 mmol/l NaH2PO4, 13 mmol/l sodium citrate, pH 7.4. This mixture was centrifuged (1000g for 20 min at room temperature) over a layer of Percoll (Amersham, Amersham, UK) supplemented with 13 mmol/l sodium citrate and 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA). The Percoll had a density of 1.077 g/ml. Contaminating erythrocytes in the neutrophil pellet were subsequently lysed with 3 volumes of a buffer containing 155 mmol/l NH4Cl, 10 mmol/l KHCO3, and 0.1 mmol/l EDTA, pH 7.4, for 10 min at 0°C followed by two washing steps (400g, 5 min, 4°C) in PBS. A purity of 98% PMNLs and a vitality of at least 95% (trypan blue exclusion) was routinely achieved. Dog (beagle) and rhesus monkey PMNLs were isolated by essentially the same technique with similar yield. Casein-elicited rat and guinea pig neutrophils were obtained by peritoneal lavage 24 h after intraperitoneal injection of 4 ml of a casein suspension (6 g of casein in 50 ml of isotonic saline). Viability was routinely >98% and purity >85%.
Membrane Preparation from Isolated Neutrophils
The cells, washed in PBS were suspended at ca. 4 × 107cells/ml in the same buffer supplemented with 0.1 mmol/l phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (Serva). After equilibration for 30 min at 4°C in a nitrogen cell disruption bomb (1000 psi = 70 bar), cells were disintegrated by slow release into atmospheric pressure. The unbroken cells and cell organelles were removed by centrifugation (1000g, 15 min, 4°C). The membrane fraction obtained by centrifugation at 50,000g (1 h, 4°C) was resuspended in a volume of buffer sufficient to adjust the protein concentration to 5 mg of protein/ml. Membranes were stored in aliquots at −80°C before use.
In Vitro Assays for LTB4 Function
LTB4 Receptor Binding.
Competition studies with intact human PMNLs or isolated PMNL membranes were performed with 0.3 nM [3H]LTB4 in a total volume of 0.5 ml. The assay mixtures, containing radioligand, cells, or membranes and the appropriate dilutions of the test substances (10−5–10−11 mol/l) in PBS, were incubated at 0°C (ice bath) in case of vital cells or at 22°C (membranes) for the times indicated. The incubation was terminated by rapid filtration through Whatman GF/C filters. Filters were washed three times with ice-cold incubation buffer (10 mmol/l HEPES, pH 7.4, supplemented with 145 mmol/l NaCl, 1 mmol/l MgCl2, 5 mmol/l KCl, 0.5 mmol/l Na2HPO4, 6 mmol/l glucose, 0.1% bovine serum albumin). Radioactivity was measured by liquid scintillation counting (Beckman, München, Germany) after adding 4 ml of Opti Fluor (Packard, Meriden, CT) to dried filters. Each assay was performed in triplicate and the assays were repeated as indicated in the tables. Specific binding was defined as total binding minus nonspecific binding determined in the presence of 0.1 μmol/l LTB4.
Measurement of Cytoplasmic Calcium Concentrations upon LTB4 Stimulation of PMNLs.
Freshly isolated PMNLs were incubated 1 h at 37°C with 4 μmol/l Fura-2 AM (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) in PBS buffer (140 mmol/l NaCl, 9.2 mmol/l Na2HPO4, 1.2 mmol/l NaH2PO4), and then centrifuged at 300g, resuspended in PBS plus test compound (or vehicle control), and transferred to a stirred cuvette held at room temperature in an LS 5 spectrofluorimeter (PerkinElmer, Norwalk, CT). The intensities of fluorescence (F) at the emission wavelength 510 nm were measured first at an excitation wavelengths of 340 nm and then at 380 nm and the ratio (R = F340/F380) of Fura-2 fluorescence calculated. LTB4 was then added to a final concentration (unless otherwise indicated) of 100 nmol/l and the changes in F340, F380, and thus R measured every 3 s. R is proportional to the intracellular cytosolic Ca2+ concentrations. Absolute Ca2+ concentrations could be calculated as described by Minta et al. (1989). For each individual test sample, a baseline value of R, Rprestim, was determined before LTB4 stimulation. Ca2+ entry inhibiting potencies of test agents were quantified by integrating measurements of R (Rprestim set zero) over the 1st min after addition of LTB4.
Neutrophil Chemotaxis.
PMNLs were isolated essentially as previously described. Percoll (Percoll density 1.077) was layered under citrate-buffered blood from different healthy donors. For sedimentation, blood was mixed with ammonium chloride buffer and allowed to stand for 15 min at room temperature. The pelleted PMNLs where washed and chemotaxis was measured as described by Lippert et al. (1998), with minor modifications. A 96-well microchemotaxis chamber was used with a 96-well microtiter plate (Costar, Cambridge, MA) as lower chamber. The microtiter plate was filled with 50 nM LTB4 and the respective test compounds in the concentrations from 0.1 to 30 nmol/l in a final volume of 350 μl in PBS (with 0.1% BSA, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2). The upper chambers were separated by a polycarbonate filter (8-μm pores; Nucleopore, Pleasanton, CA) and filled with 300 μl of 1 × 106 PMNLs in PBS, including test compounds. After incubation (120 min at 37°C), the microtiter plate, including filter membrane was centrifuged at 1300g, the supernatant aspirated, and sedimented cells lysed with 100 μl of 0.25% Triton-X 45 at room temperature for 30 min.
Migrated cells were quantified as myeloperoxidase activity as increase of optical density of the oxidation product of the substrateo-dianisidine dihydrochloride per minute at 450 nm over 5 min (Bradley et al., 1982). IC50 was derived graphically. Myeloperoxidase activity has previously been reported to correlate with neutrophil numbers.
Specificity control studies were also carried out in which the stimulator LTB4 (final concentration 30 nM) was replaced with formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (30 nM), interleukin-8 (3 nM), C5a (5 nM), platelet-activating factor (100 nM), tumor necrosis factor-α (0.01 nM), or phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (100 nM).
In Vitro LTB4-Induced PMNL CD11b (Mac-1) Expression.
Venous blood samples were incubated 20 min at 37°C with 10 μl of LTB4 (final concentration 40 nM) and indicated concentrations of respective test compounds. After incubation of 30 min at 4°C with saturating concentration of a fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled monoclonal anti-CD11b antibody (Bear-1; Coulter, Krefeld, Germany), red blood cells were lysed by formic acid and white blood cells were fixed with paraformaldehyde using a Q prep automated device (Coulter). The degree of fluorescent staining was determined on a Coulter Epics XL-MCL flow cytometer. Mouse FITC-IgG1 lacking anti-CD11b activity was used as the isotype control. Fluorescence was quantified within the granulocyte gates, defined by forward and sideward light scatter, and the mean channel fluorescence ratio was calculated as a measure of Mac-1 expression.
In Vivo Assays for LTB4 Function
Neutropenia.
LTB4-induced neutropenia was assessed after substance administration in monkeys, rats, and guinea pigs. The technique was essentially similar in all species. Two catheters were laid, through one of which LTB4 in saline/2% ethanol was injected, from the other of which blood was withdrawn into EDTA-Microvettes (Sarstedt, Germany) immediately prior and 30 s after LTB4 administration. LTB4-induced neutropenia was assessed immediately before administration of drugs by oral gavage and at the stated time points thereafter. Neutrophils of guinea pigs were estimated manually by counting total cells and estimating the proportion of neutrophils from cytocentrifuge preparations stained with May-Grunwald-Giemsa. Neutrophils in rats and monkeys were estimated automatically using a Technicon H.1E cell counter together with multispecies software (Miles Diagnostics version 3.0). This not only counted the cells but also differentiated them according to light scattering characteristics and peroxidase staining.
Rat neutropenia.
Catheters were laid in the left carotid artery and jugular veins under anesthesia with 100 mg/kg ketamine hydrochloride (Ketavet; Parke Davis, Berlin, Germany) and 4 mg/kg xylazine (Rompun; Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany). LTB4 was administered as a bolus at a dose of 1 μg/kg in a volume of 1.0 ml/kg.
Guinea pig neutropenia.
As for rats, except that the LTB4 dose was 0.1 μg/kg. Animals were only used if the proportion of neutrophils in the baseline blood sample lay between 20 and 60% of total leukocytes.
Monkey neutropenia. Catheters were laid in the left and right cubital veins under a short-acting anesthetic (ketamine hydrochloride 7 mg/kg). This anesthesia was repeated for each LTB4 challenge. LTB4 was administered as a bolus at a dose of 30 ng/kg in a volume 0.1 ml/kg.
For statistical analysis, the neutrophils measured 60 s after administration of LTB4 were expressed as percentage of reduction related to the neutrophils measured immediately before LTB4 administration. A percentage of inhibition, INHi, of this reduction at each dose and time point was calculated individually for each animal. To calculate the ED50 value with 95% confidence interval for the results with rats and guinea pigs the logarithms of dose and the inhibition values were fitted to a sigmoidal curve using the method of least squares and the following equation:
In the monkey neutropenia studies, only three doses of CGS25019 C or LY 293111 were tested, and here the logarithms of dose and the inhibition values were fitted by simple linear regression for calculation of ED50. Seven dose levels of BIIL 284 were available, but for consistency the same method of calculating the ED50 was applied using only those doses that described the linear portion of the dose-response curve.
To calculate duration of action of drug (e.g., data from Fig. 7) the percentage of inhibition INHi was fitted to an exponential function beginning with the time that caused the maximum inhibition. The method of least squares and the following equation were used:
Ex Vivo LTB4-Induced PMNL CD11b (Mac-1) Expression.
BIIL 284 was given orally to eight fasted male monkeys at doses of 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, and 0.3 mg/kg. A washout time of minimally 14 days was allowed between the individual doses, which were given according to a randomization scheme. All eight monkeys received all four doses and vehicle as control. Venous blood samples were taken into EDTA-Monovettes before, and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 24 h after oral dosing by gavage of fasted rhesus monkeys. Duplicate 90-μl aliquots of fresh blood were incubated 20 min at 37°C with 10 μl of LTB4 (final concentration 40 nM) or vehicle, and then subsequently incubated 30 min at 4°C with saturating concentration of an FITC-labeled monoclonal mouse antibody (Bear-1; Coulter), which reacted with both human and monkey CD11b antigens. Mouse IgG1-FITC was used as isotype control. Subsequent processing was as described above.
Neutrophil Migration into Mouse Ear.
Adult female HsdWin:NMRI mice received compound or vehicle control p.o. 30 min before challenge with 250 ng (5 μl) of LTB4 applied in acetone to each side of the left ear under light anesthesia. The animals were killed with ether 6 h later, and a biopsy (diameter 8 mm) was punched from both the left ear and the right (untreated) ear. Acetone treatment alone had no effect. To assess the increase of PMNL in the left ear compared with the contralateral ear, tissue samples were homogenized in 1 ml of 0.5% hexadecyl-trimethyl-ammonium-bromide dissolved in 0.05 M phosphate buffer, pH 6.0, using a tissue homogenizer (IKA-Ultraturrax T5; Janke & Kunkel, Staufen/Breisgau, Germany) at 30,000 rpm for 15 s. After centrifugation (16,000g, 5 min) the supernatants were frozen until processing for spectrophotometric myeloperoxidase determination (see above). The dose groups were compared with the corresponding control groups in a Wilcoxon test calculating exact p values by means of a permutation test procedure. An inhibition of LTB4-induced accumulation of neutrophils related to the concurrent control group was defined as follows:
To calculate the ED50 value with 95% confidence interval for accumulation of neutrophils into the ear the logarithms of dose and the inhibition values were fitted to a sigmoidal curve using the method of least squares and an equation analogous to that described in the section above dealing with the neutropenia studies.
Statistics
All statistical analyses was performed with the software product SAS (SAS Institute, Cary, NC), version 6.08.
Results
In Vitro Models
Effect of BIIL 284 and Metabolites on LTB4 Binding to Human LTB4 Receptors.
Due to its prodrug character, BIIL 284 does not bind to the LTB4 receptor with high affinity, as shown on freshly isolated human granulocytes and membranes thereof.
BIIL 260, the active metabolite formed from the prodrug BIIL 284 and its glucuronide conjugate BIIL 315, however, bind to the LTB4 receptor on human granulocytes or cell membranes thereof (Table 1) with high affinity in monophasic displacement curves. TheirKi values of 1.7 and 1.9 nmol/l are similar to the affinity of LTB4, which also displaced [3H]LTB4 in monophasic displacement curves from LTB4receptors on vital PMNLs with Ki = 2.1 ± 0.93 nmol/l and Ki = 1.1 ± 0.11 nmol/l on PMNL membranes (Fig.2). The receptor binding system used thus reflects interactions with the high-affinity sites of the LTB4 receptors. For monocytes (human monocytic U937 cells), similar Ki values were calculated for BIIL 260 and BIIL 315 in LTB4binding assays compared with human PMNLs (Table2). Scatchard plots (Fig.3) of binding of [3H]LTB4 to human PMNL receptors in the presence of no, 5, or 20 nmol/l BIIL 260 or 1 or 5 nmol/l BIIL 315 were essentially linear and calculated values ofBmax were essentially similar at each of the drug concentrations tested, whereas apparentKD increased with increasing drug concentration (Table 3). From the combined results from [3H]LTB4 displacement and saturation experiments, it can be concluded that the interaction of the BIIL 284 active metabolites BIIL 260 and BIIL 315 with the LTB4 receptor is saturable, reversible, and competitive.
Receptor binding assays using 27 different human non-LTB4 receptors and their specific ligands for determining specificity of the active metabolites were performed. No relevant binding was found for any of the receptors determined (data not shown).
Species Differences in LTB4 Receptor Binding of BIIL 260 and Reference Compounds.
Due to the prodrug character of BIIL 284, i.e., the masking of the benzamidine moiety, no high-affinity binding of BIIL 284 to the LTB4 receptor was measured. BIIL 260 was particularly active at the human LTB4 receptor (on PMNLs,Ki = 1.7 ± 0.72 nmol/l; on U937 cells, Ki = 1.2 ± 0.33 nmol/l) and the monkey LTB4 receptor (on PMNLs,Ki = 1.8 ± 0.33 nmol/l, Table2). BIIL 260 displayed considerably lower affinity to LTB4 receptors on rat PMNLs (Ki = 6.0 + 3.4 nmol/l) and even more so in the guinea pig (Ki = 25 + 5.7 nmol/l) and the dog, Ki = 44 + 18 nmol/l). Essentially the same pattern was found for its glucuronide conjugate BIIL 315. The benzamidine compound CGS 25019 C (not a prodrug) as well as LY 293111 displayed a comparable pattern of higher affinities to human and monkey receptors and reduced affinities to guinea pig and dog LTB4 receptors. The rank order of affinities human ≈ monkey ≥ rat ≫ guinea pig > dog was similar for BIIL 260 and BIIL 315.
Effect of BIIL 284 and Metabolites on LTB4-Induced Elevation of Intracellular Calcium Levels in Human PMNLs (Fura-2).
For a functional evaluation of the LTB4inhibitory potency of BIIL 284 BS metabolites in vitro, LTB4-induced Ca2+transients of vital human PMNLs were studied.
Intracellular Ca2+ increase is an early and sensitive hallmark of cellular activation. Ca2+transients were dose dependently induced by LTB4in PMNLs. Maximal Ca2+ responses at 0.3 μmol/l LTB4 were dose dependently inhibited by BIIL 284 metabolites. BIIL 260 and its glucuronide BIIL 315 inhibited LTB4-induced intracellular Ca2+ release in human neutrophils with IC50 values of 0.82 and 0.75 nmol/l, respectively. No agonistic activity of either BIIL 260 or BIIL 315 was found on intracellular Ca2+ levels. In the presence of 0.1% BSA, the inhibitory potency of BIIL 260 and BIIL 315 was reduced 6- to 8-fold due to protein binding. Similar results were obtained for the reference LTB4 antagonists CGS 25019 C and LY 293111 (Table 4). LY 293111 appears to lose more potency by protein binding (factor of about 9) than CGS 25019 C (factor of about 2). Functional inhibition of LTB4-induced cell activation in the presence of protein is thus achieved in the same concentrations as those found inhibitory for LTB4receptor binding.
LTB4-Induced Chemotaxis of Human PMNLs.
BIIL 260 and BIIL 315 potently inhibited LTB4-induced chemotaxis of human PMNLs with IC50 values of 2.90 and 0.65 nmol/l. BIIL 260, BIIL 315, and CGS 25019 C (IC50 of 1 nmol/l) were about equipotent, whereas LY 293111 (66.2 nmol/l) was about 50-fold less potent (Table 5).
Functional inhibition of LTB4-induced cell activation monitored by intracellular Ca2+release and inhibition of LTB4-induced chemotaxis were achieved by comparable concentrations of BIIL 260, BIIL 315, and CGS 25019 C. LY 293111 appears to loose more functional potency by protein binding.
In Vivo Models
Inhibition of LTB4-Induced Neutropenia.
BIIL 284 dosed orally as well as intravenously was effective in inhibiting LTB4-induced neutropenia in all species tested (rat, guinea pig, monkey). Maximum inhibition was observed between 5 and 7 h after oral administration in monkeys and guinea pigs, and between 3 and 5 h in rats. The compound was extremely potent in all species tested. In rats, the ED50 3 h after oral was 0.019 mg/kg, with 95% confidence limits 0.009 to 0.041 mg/kg. ED50 values at this time point of the literature reference substances CGS 25019 C and LY 293111 were 1.7 and 12.2 mg/kg, respectively. In rhesus monkeys, the ED50 7 h after dosage was 0.0041 mg/kg, with 95% confidence limits 0.0027 to 0.0068 mg/kg. ED50 values at this time point of the literature reference substances CGS 25019 C and LY 293111 were 3.4 and 5.0 mg/kg, respectively. In monkeys, even at the first measurement time point (after 1 h) BIIL 284 had an ED50 of 0.0119 mg/kg, with confidence limits 0.0082–0.0197 mg/kg (reference LY 293111 ED50 at this time point 3.0 mg/kg). Figure4 compares BIIL 284 dosed at 0.03 mg/kg and reference substance CGS 25019 C and LY 293111, both dosed at 3 mg/kg p.o. over a series of time periods.
In both monkeys (Fig. 4) and rats (Fig.5), a dose of 0.3 mg/kg BIIL 284 BS p.o. achieved an inhibition greater than 50% between 1 and 7 h. An exponential function was fitted to the values from rats, measured at and after the time point (3 h) of maximum inhibition of neutropenia. This analysis gave a time of 8.0 h (95% confidence limits 6.8–9.3 h) for the degree of inhibition to be halved.
In guinea pigs, neutropenia was 50% inhibited between 5 and 16 h after dosage at 0.5 mg/kg p.o., but a slightly slower time of onset was observed. Figure 6 compares the duration of action of BIIL 284 dosed at 0.5 mg/kg and of reference substances CGS 25019 C and LY 293111, both dosed at 1 mg/kg p.o. Oral BIIL 284 protected against LTB4-induced neutropenia for 16 h, whereas both reference substances had a duration of protective activity for no longer than 3 h. The active metabolite of BIIL 284, BIIL 315 (formed by removal of the ethoxycarbonyl protecting group and glucuronidation), was also tested in guinea pigs and was also highly active and long-acting. The ED50 after intravenous injection (2 min before LTB4) was 0.0095 mg/kg (95% confidence limits 0.0063–0.0143 mg/kg). A dose of 0.03 mg/kg i.v. was used to determine the duration of action of this metabolite. An exponential function was fitted, beginning at the last time at which inhibition was maximal (16 h postadministration) and ending at 145 h (Fig.7). The fall from total to 50% inhibition of neutropenia required 55 h.
Inhibition of LTB4-Induced Accumulation of Neutrophils in the Mouse Ear.
BIIL 284 and CGS 25019 C were able to inhibit LTB4-induced mouse ear inflammation dose dependently after p.o. administration. The calculated ED50 values were 0.0082 (0.0067–0.010) mg/kg p.o. for BIIL 284 and 5.3 (4.29–6.54) mg/kg p.o. for CGS 25019 C. LY 293111 showed no dose-dependent effect, however, doses of 5 and 10 mg/kg p.o. demonstrated significant (p = 0.007 andp = 0.019, respectively) anti-inflammatory effects in this model.
In Vivo Inhibition of LTB4-Induced Inhibition of Mac-1 Expression on ex Vivo Granulocytes.
Orally dosed BIIL 284 was highly effective in inhibiting LTB4-induced Mac-1 expression on ex vivo neutrophils in monkeys. Maximum inhibition was observed between 5 and 7 h after oral administration. An ED50 of 0.05 mg/kg was calculated in monkeys (Fig. 8). A dose of 0.3 mg/kg p.o. was used to determine the duration of action of BIIL 284 and found to completely inhibit LTB4-induced Mac-1 expression over 24 h (Fig. 9).
Discussion
BIIL 284, its metabolite BIIL 260 (formed by removal of the ethoxycarbonyl protecting group), and its major metabolite BIIL 315 (formed by removal of the protecting group and glucuronidation) had potent in vitro and in vivo LTB4 antagonistic properties. Due to the prodrug character of BIIL 284, i.e., the masking of the benzamidine moiety, no high-affinity binding of BIIL 284 to the LTB4 receptor was measured, but both metabolites had high affinity (Ki less than 2 nM) to the LTB4 receptor on U937 cells or on isolated human neutrophils or membranes thereof. The reference compound CGS 25019 C, also a benzamidine, had an affinity for the human LTB4 receptor of the same order as that of the BIIL 284 metabolites, whereas the affinity of LY 293111 (5.5 nM on neutrophilic granulocytes, 24 nM on U937 cells) was somewhat less. Our calculated affinity constants of LY 293111 for the human LTB4 receptor are of the same order as the value reported in the literature (25 nM, Marder et al., 1995). The high affinity of the glucuronide BIIL 315 for the LTB4receptor was surprising in view of the bulkiness of the carbohydrate group, and the fact that many other glucuronides have considerably less affinity for their receptors than the parent substance. It supports drug-receptor models in which the 4-hydroxyphenyl moiety of the benzamidine is held away from the receptor binding site.
For in depth analysis we used neutrophil membranes as source of human LTB4 receptors. BIIL 260 and BIIL 315 (like LTB4 itself) displaced [3H]LTB4 in monophasic displacement curves. Experimental points were fitted well by the law of mass action-based program EASY FIT (Schittkowski, 1994). Fitting was optimal using a one receptor/two ligand model, which accords with interactions with a single high-affinity site of the LTB4 receptor. [3H]LTB4 saturation experiments without and in the presence of BIIL 260 or BIIL 315 directly demonstrated the saturable, reversible and competitive nature of their interaction with the LTB4 receptor. Both LTB4 receptor concentrations and apparentKD values calculated with EASY FIT compared well with results from graphical analysis according toScatchard (1949). Scatchard analysis revealed LTB4 receptor concentrations (Bmax values) essentially unchanged in the presence of two concentrations of either BIIL 260 and BIIL 315. However, due to reduced binding levels and consequently increasing variability of low radioactivity measures in the presence of high concentrations of antagonist an appreciable variability was found in the Bmax concentrations determined. In contrast, increasing values of the apparentKD values for [3H]LTB4 were calculated in the presence of BIIL 260 and BIIL 315. These findings indicate a competitive interaction of the ligands LTB4, BIIL 260, and BIIL 315 with the human LTB4 receptor.
In further studies (not detailed in this article) no evidence was obtained of relevant binding to any other receptor apart from the LTB4 receptor. From the combined binding results, the specific, reversible, and competitive nature of the interaction of the BIIL 284 active metabolites BIIL 260 and BIIL 315 with the LTB4 receptor can be concluded.
Interpretation of comparisons of antagonist potencies from in vivo models in different species requires characterization of LTB4 receptor binding properties in these species. The rank order of affinities, i.e., human ≈ monkey ≥ rat ≫ guinea pig > dog was similar for the benzamidines BIIL 260, BIIL 315, and CGS 25019 C, and the carboxylic acid derivative LY 293111. We are cautious in extrapolating from species comparisons of affinity to species differences in the in vivo situation because in addition to LTB4 receptor affinity, LTB4 receptor kinetic properties (i.e., receptor off-dissociation rates), and species-specific pharmacokinetic properties are major determinants of efficacy in vivo. However, the high affinity of BIIL 260 and BIIL 315 at the human receptor encourages us to expect even higher potency of the LTB4antagonists studied in humans, when potency is projected from pharmacological models in guinea pigs, rats, or dogs. About similar potency can be expected from results in monkey models.
One functional consequence of LTB4 receptor binding is the immediate induction of intracellular calcium transients. Intracellular Ca2+ increase is an early and sensitive hallmark of cellular activation (Richter et al., 1990). BIIL 260 and its glucuronide BIIL 315 dose dependently inhibited LTB4-induced intracellular Ca2+ release in human neutrophils. Maximal Ca2+ responses at 0.3 μmol/l LTB4 were inhibited with IC50 values of 0.82 and 0.75 nM, respectively. In the presence of 0.1% bovine serum albumin, the inhibitory potency of BIIL 260 and BIIL 315 was reduced 6- to 8-fold due to protein binding (BIIL 260 Cl, IC50 = 6.6 nM; BIIL 315 ZW, IC50 = 4.3 nM). No agonistic activity of either BIIL 260 or BIIL 315 in intracellular Ca2+ levels could be found. Of the reference molecules LY 293111 appears to loose more potency by protein binding (factor of about 9) than CGS 25019 C (factor of about 2). Under these conditions, which may reflect more the physiological situation of PMNLs in blood, inhibition of cell activation is achieved at comparable concentrations to those found inhibitory for LTB4 receptor binding. The IC50 for inhibition of LTB4-induced calcium mobilization in human neutrophils by reference substance LY 293111 in the presence of BSA, as reported here (12 nM) is not very different from the value (20 nM) reported by Marder et al. (1995).
For a functional evaluation of the LTB4inhibitory potency of BIIL 284 active metabolites in vitro, chemotaxis of vital human PMNL was evaluated. BIIL 260 and BIIL 315 potently inhibited LTB4-induced chemotaxis with IC50 values of 2.90 and 0.65 nM. BIIL 260 and CGS 25019 C were equipotent to BIIL 315 under the test conditions with albumin, whereas LY 293111 was about 100-fold less potent.
We are cautious in comparing drug concentrations required to inhibit LTB4 effects in binding studies, in functional studies in tissue culture, and in whole blood, not least because of the importance of protein binding in influencing the drug concentrations required. However, LTB4 receptor binding, inhibition of LTB4-induced cell activation as monitored by intracellular Ca2+ release, and functional inhibition of LTB4-induced chemotaxis do seem to be achieved at comparable concentrations of BIIL 260 and BIIL 315. This indicates an LTB4receptor-mediated mechanism of activity for the active principle of the prodrug BIIL 284, i.e., BIIL 260 and its glucuronide BIIL 315.
In addition to our in vitro studies, we examined the in vivo activity of BIIL 284 in several species. LTB4-induced activation of neutrophils increases their stickiness to endothelial cells by expression of adhesion molecules such as CD11b. The inhibition of this transient neutropenia after intravenous LTB4 injection served as a measure of LTB4 antagonism. BIIL 284 dosed orally as well as intravenously was effective in inhibiting LTB4-induced neutropenia in all species tested (rat, guinea pig, and monkey). Maximum inhibition was observed between 5 and 7 h after oral administration of solubilized BIIL 284. The compound was extremely potent in all species tested with ED50 of 0.019 mg/kg in rat and 0.0041 mg/kg in rhesus monkeys. ED50 values (3 h postdosing) of the literature reference substances CGS 25019 C and LY 293111 were 1.7 and 12.2 mg/kg, respectively, in rats and 3.4 and 5.0 mg/kg, respectively, in monkeys. Our values for the doses of reference compounds required to inhibit neutropenia confirm those reported in the literature. Thus, CGS 251019 C given 3 h before LTB4 challenge was reported by Raychaudhuri et al. (1995) to inhibit LTB4-induced neutropenia in rats with an ED50 of 2 mg/kg. These workers also reported ED50 values for inhibition of arachidonic acid-induced mouse ear neutrophil influx (myeloperoxidase) by CGS 251019 C. The reported values of 1.2 mg/kg for the early (1.5-h) inflammation and 7.7 mg/kg for the 18-h inflammation compare with an ED50 measured here of 5.3 mg/kg (measured 6 h after LTB4 administration). The in vivo potency of BIIL 284 compared with the reference substances was found to be unexpectedly high, considering their relative in vitro potency. BIIL 315 was also highly active in vivo. The ED50 of BIIL 315 in guinea pig neutropenia after intravenous injection was 0.0095 mg/kg. The duration of action of this metabolite was very long, requiring 55 h for the fall from total to 50% inhibition at a dose of 0.03 mg/kg i.v. This very long duration of action was also found for orally administered BIIL 284. In guinea pigs, BIIL 284 dosed at 0.5 mg/kg protected against LTB4-induced neutropenia for 16 h, whereas both reference substances dosed at 1 mg/kg p.o. had a duration of 50% protective activity for no longer than 3 h. It is likely that it is the long half-life of the metabolite that explains the long duration of action of BIIL 284. In monkeys, BIIL 284 dosed at 0.3 mg/kg completely protected for 7 h, whereas CGS 25019 C, dosed at 3 mg/kg p.o., had fallen to 50% inhibition after 6 h. LY 293111, also dosed at 3 mg/kg p.o., inhibited neutropenia maximally about by 50% in this model at this time. When the dose of LY 293111 was raised to 10 mg/kg inhibition was virtually complete over a period of 5 h. LY 293111 (10 mg/kg) was the dose reported by Allen et al. (1996) to significantly block bronchoalveolar neutrophilia in rhesus monkey produced by LTB4 inhalation.
Mac-1 inhibition on ex vivo LTB4-stimulated PMNLs confirmed the high potency and long duration of action found in neutropenia models. Maximum inhibition was observed between 5 and 7 h after oral administration of BIIL 284 in Tylose suspension with an ED50 of 0.05 mg/kg. A single oral dose of 0.3 mg/kg p.o. completely inhibited LTB4-induced Mac-1 expression over 24 h.
Inhibition of ex vivo Mac-1 expression on PMNLs has also been used in clinical trials as surrogate marker for CGS 25019 C (Morgan et al., 1995) and LY 293111 (Marder et al., 1996). It will be useful in clinical trials of BIIL 284. We believe that with BIIL 284 we have available a specific, potent, and long-acting LTB4 antagonist suitable for a clinical proof of concept in a variety of inflammatory diseases, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, arthritis, and cystic fibrosis.
Acknowledgments
We thank Annerose Kersten, Klaus-Dieter Hartmann, Dirk Gester, Christine Meissner, Eweline Pietrowski, Gertrude Porr, Rita Scheit, Hans Schmitt, and Lydia Schwindt for technical assistance during this study; Dipl. stat. Rene Kubiak and Volker Krzykalla for help with statistical analysis; and Dr. M. Wolf for help with binding model analysis.
Footnotes
-
Send reprint requests to: Dr. F. Birke, Abteilung Atemwegsforschung, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma, KG D-55216 Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany. E-mail:Birke{at}ing.boehringer-ingelheim.com
- Abbreviations:
- LTB4
- leukotriene B4
- PMNL
- polymorphonuclear leukocyte
- BIIL 284 BS
- carbamic acid, [[4-[[3-[[4-[1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-1-methylethyl]phenoxy]methyl]phenyl]methoxy]phenyl]iminomethyl]-, ethyl ester
- LY 293111
- benzoic acid, 2-[3-[3-[(5-ethyl-4′-fluoro-2-hydroxy[1,1′-biphenyl]-4yl)oxy]propoxy]-2-propylphenoxy]-, monosodium
- CGS 25019 C
- benzamide, 4-[[5-[4-(aminoiminomethyl)phenoxy]pentyl]oxy]-3-methoxy-N,N-bis(1methylethyl)-, sulfate
- BIIL 260 CL
- benzenecarboximidamide, [[4-[[3-[[4-[1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-1-methylethyl]phenoxy]methyl]phenyl]methoxy]-, monohydrochloride
- BIIL 315 ZW
- β-d-glucopyranosiduronic acid, 4-[1-[4-[[3-[[4-(aminoiminomethyl)phenoxy]methyl]phenyl]methoxy]phenyl]-1-methylethyl]phenyl
- BSA
- bovine serum albumin
- PBS
- phosphate-buffered saline
- FITC
- fluorescein isothiocyanate
- Received November 15, 2000.
- Accepted January 2, 2001.
- The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics