Abstract

The monkey is considered the best animal model to study the pharmacokinetics of zidovudine (azidothymidine, AZT) because humans and monkeys eliminate 60 to 75% of AZT by metabolism to the 5'-O-glucuronide (GAZT), in contrast to other experimental animals, which excrete most of the drug unchanged in the urine. It has become increasingly difficult and costly to use monkeys in research. Therefore, we undertook studies to determine the suitability of the rat as an alternative animal model to study the pharmacokinetics of AZT. In the initial experiments, [3H]AZT was administered i.v. at doses of 19, 60 and 187 mumol/kg to male Sprague-Dawley rats with intact bile ducts. The respective values (mean +/- S.D.) for total clearance of AZT were 2.4 +/- 0.2, 2.3 +/- 0.3 and 1.8 +/- 0.4 l/hr/kg and for renal clearance were 1.7 +/- 0.2, 1.8 +/- 0.4 and 1.5 +/- 0.4 l/hr/kg. The renal clearance of AZT was approximately equal to renal plasma flow of rats (1.5 l/hr/kg), suggesting that in addition to filtration, AZT is also efficiently secreted in the kidney of the rat. The respective values for volume of distribution at steady state were 1.3 +/- 0.2, 1.0 +/- 0.2 and 0.84 +/- 0.19 l/kg (P less than .05) and elimination half-life were (harmonic mean) 0.55, 0.44 and 0.46 hr. Urinary excretion of AZT as unchanged drug in intact rats accounted for 70 +/- 6, 79 +/- 6, and 83 +/- 12% of the dose, whereas only 0.7 to 0.8% of the dose was recovered in the urine as GAZT. Rats with exteriorized bile ducts, the proposed alternative animal model, were given an i.v. dose of 60 mumol/kg of [3H]AZT. To test the effect of a concurrently administered drug on the elimination of AZT in the model, some rats with bile duct cannulas were pretreated with probenecid, a known inhibitor of AZT elimination in humans. Urine and bile were collected to quantify the formation of GAZT. GAZT was identified by fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry as the major metabolite of AZT in the rat. GAZT excretion in the bile and urine accounted for 11 +/- 3% of the dose in saline-treated rats, compared to only 1.4 +/- 0.3% in rats treated with probenecid (P less than .001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)