Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit jpet on Facebook
  • Follow jpet on Twitter
  • Follow jpet on LinkedIn
Abstract

Mechanism of protection afforded by polyaspartic acid against gentamicin-induced phospholipidosis. II. Comparative in vitro and in vivo studies with poly-L-aspartic, poly-L-glutamic and poly-D-glutamic acids.

B K Kishore, P Lambricht, G Laurent, P Maldague, R Wagner and P M Tulkens
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics November 1990, 255 (2) 875-885;
B K Kishore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P Lambricht
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G Laurent
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P Maldague
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R Wagner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P M Tulkens
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Poly-L-aspartic acid (poly-L-Asp) protects rats against gentamicin (GM)-induced nephrotoxicity (functional and pathological changes) and early cortical alterations (phospholipidosis and increase in cell turnover) without decreasing, but actually increasing, the renal accumulation of the drug. We suggested that this protection occurs through the complexation of GM by poly-L-Asp, after their pinocytosis and accumulation in the lysosomes of the renal cortex (Kishore et al., J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 867-874, 1990). Here we examine further our proposal by comparatively assessing poly-L-Asp (as provided by the Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO; MW 9-11,000), with two other polyanionic peptides, viz, poly-L-glutamic (poly-L-Glu; MW 14,300) and poly-D-glutamic (poly-D-Glu; MW 20,000) acids obtained from the same supplier. In vitro, all three polyanions showed a similar capacity to bind GM, to displace it from anionic phospholipids at acid pH and thereby to decrease the inhibitory potency of GM toward lysosomal phospholipase A1. In vivo, however, only poly-L-Asp and poly-D-Glu were able to prevent the development of GM-induced renal lysosomal phospholipidosis as assessed by key biochemical criteria (increase in lipid phosphorus and decrease of acid sphingomyelinase activity) and by examination of the lysosomal content in the electron microscope (accumulation of myeloid bodies). Based on these criteria, poly-L-Glu completely failed to protect. In vitro, poly-L-Glu was 13- to 17-fold more susceptible to hydrolysis by liver lysosomal extracts at pH 5.4 after 48 hr incubation, as compared to poly-L-Asp and poly-D-Glu, respectively. Assuming that all three polyanions tested are transported and accumulated in lysosomes of renal cortex to the same extent and that their respective rates of hydrolysis therein compare to that measured in vitro, these results suggest that stability of polyanions in lysosomes is an essential requisite for protection against GM-induced phospholipidosis and thus strengthens our earlier proposal that the site of action of poly-L-Asp must be in lysosomes. Although protecting from phospholipidosis, poly-D-Glu, however, caused a so far undescribed lysosomal storage disorder consisting of the accumulation of osmiophilic, nonlamellar material. This study, therefore, also demonstrates that not all polyanions resistant to lysosomal enzymes can be used as nephroprotectants, inasmuch as these, as is the case for poly-D-Glu, may cause renal alterations on their own.

JPET articles become freely available 12 months after publication, and remain freely available for 5 years. 

Non-open access articles that fall outside this five year window are available only to institutional subscribers and current ASPET members, or through the article purchase feature at the bottom of the page. 

 

  • Click here for information on institutional subscriptions.
  • Click here for information on individual ASPET membership.

 

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Vol. 255, Issue 2
1 Nov 1990
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mechanism of protection afforded by polyaspartic acid against gentamicin-induced phospholipidosis. II. Comparative in vitro and in vivo studies with poly-L-aspartic, poly-L-glutamic and poly-D-glutamic acids.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Abstract

Mechanism of protection afforded by polyaspartic acid against gentamicin-induced phospholipidosis. II. Comparative in vitro and in vivo studies with poly-L-aspartic, poly-L-glutamic and poly-D-glutamic acids.

B K Kishore, P Lambricht, G Laurent, P Maldague, R Wagner and P M Tulkens
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics November 1, 1990, 255 (2) 875-885;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Abstract

Mechanism of protection afforded by polyaspartic acid against gentamicin-induced phospholipidosis. II. Comparative in vitro and in vivo studies with poly-L-aspartic, poly-L-glutamic and poly-D-glutamic acids.

B K Kishore, P Lambricht, G Laurent, P Maldague, R Wagner and P M Tulkens
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics November 1, 1990, 255 (2) 875-885;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About JPET
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-0103 (Online)

Copyright © 2022 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics