Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit jpet on Facebook
  • Follow jpet on Twitter
  • Follow jpet on LinkedIn
Abstract

Differences in the effects of selenite and biological selenium on the chemical form and distribution of mercury after the simultaneous administration of HgCl2 and selenium to rats.

L Magos, T W Clarkson and A R Hudson
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics February 1984, 228 (2) 478-483;
L Magos
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T W Clarkson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A R Hudson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The interaction was compared between inorganic (HgCl2) mercury and selenite (Na2SeO3) vs. the interaction between inorganic mercury and biological selenium (a freeze-dried preparation of liver from rats treated with selenite). Organ concentrations of selenium were always significantly lower after biological selenium than after selenite. Biological selenium affected the organ distribution of inorganic mercury differently than selenite. Furthermore, the speciation of mercury was affected by this form of selenium. A mercury-selenide compound (presumably HgSe) accounted for a greater proportion of total mercury in tissues after selenite than after a dose of biological selenium. Administration of selenomethionine had a similar effect on the speciation of mercury to that seen after biological selenium. As the forms of selenium in selenomethionine or selenium deposited in the liver are most likely nearer than selenite to selenium present in food, our results suggest that, as far as the reaction of mercury with selenide is concerned, experiments with selenite overestimate the protective effect of dietary selenium against inorganic mercury and possibly against methylmercury.

JPET articles become freely available 12 months after publication, and remain freely available for 5 years. 

Non-open access articles that fall outside this five year window are available only to institutional subscribers and current ASPET members, or through the article purchase feature at the bottom of the page. 

 

  • Click here for information on institutional subscriptions.
  • Click here for information on individual ASPET membership.

 

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Vol. 228, Issue 2
1 Feb 1984
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Differences in the effects of selenite and biological selenium on the chemical form and distribution of mercury after the simultaneous administration of HgCl2 and selenium to rats.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Abstract

Differences in the effects of selenite and biological selenium on the chemical form and distribution of mercury after the simultaneous administration of HgCl2 and selenium to rats.

L Magos, T W Clarkson and A R Hudson
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics February 1, 1984, 228 (2) 478-483;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Abstract

Differences in the effects of selenite and biological selenium on the chemical form and distribution of mercury after the simultaneous administration of HgCl2 and selenium to rats.

L Magos, T W Clarkson and A R Hudson
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics February 1, 1984, 228 (2) 478-483;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About JPET
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-0103 (Online)

Copyright © 2023 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics