Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit jpet on Facebook
  • Follow jpet on Twitter
  • Follow jpet on LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticle

THE METABOLIC FATE OF TRITIATED DIGOXIN IN THE DOG: A COMPARISON OF DIGITALIS ADMINISTRATION WITH AND WITHOUT A "LOADING DOSE"

Frank I. Marcus, Josee Pavlovich, Linda Burkhalter and Carol Cuccia
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics June 1967, 156 (3) 548-556;
Frank I. Marcus
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Josee Pavlovich
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Linda Burkhalter
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carol Cuccia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The metabolism of tritiated digoxin was studied in 14 dogs. The drug was given orally as follows: "loading dose" group, 0.75 mg on the 1st day and 0.2 mg daily thereafter for 5 days; "0.2 mg maintenance" group, 0.2 mg daily for 6 days; and "0.1 mg maintenance" group, 0.1 mg daily for 6 days. Serial blood samples were drawn. Twenty-four-hour urine and stool collections were made for 6 days. One day after the last dose of digoxin, the animals were sacrificed. Radioactivity was determined in the heart, liver, kidneys, skeletal muscle and bile. Chemical extraction, column and paper chromatography of these specimens were also performed. Twenty-four hours after the beginning of digoxin administration, the blood concentration of radioactivity was considerably greater in the loading-dose group than in the other two groups. However, by the end of 6 days, there was no statistical difference in the radioactivity present in the blood of the loading-dose group as compared with that in the 0.2-mg-maintenance group. There was no significant difference in concentration of radioactivity in heart, liver or skeletal muscle obtained from the loading-dose group and the 0.2-mg-maintenance group. However, in the kidney, skeletal muscle and probably in the heart, the concentration of activity was less in the 0.1-mg-maintenance group as compared with the 0.2-mg-maintenance group. The data are consistent with the hypothesis that the daily excretion of digoxin occurs as a function of the drug present in the body. In canine tissue, tritiated digoxin appears to be present largely in unchanged form and is excreted as such in the urine. Considerable biotransformation of digoxin is evident in the bile. The clinical implications of these experiments are that the initiation of digitalis therapy by a loading dose is not necessary to achieve cumulation of digoxin.

Footnotes

    • Received October 5, 1966.
    • Accepted January 10, 1967.
  • © 1967 by The Williams & Wilkins Company

JPET articles become freely available 12 months after publication, and remain freely available for 5 years. 

Non-open access articles that fall outside this five year window are available only to institutional subscribers and current ASPET members, or through the article purchase feature at the bottom of the page. 

 

  • Click here for information on institutional subscriptions.
  • Click here for information on individual ASPET membership.

 

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Vol. 156, Issue 3
1 Jun 1967
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
THE METABOLIC FATE OF TRITIATED DIGOXIN IN THE DOG: A COMPARISON OF DIGITALIS ADMINISTRATION WITH AND WITHOUT A "LOADING DOSE"
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleArticle

THE METABOLIC FATE OF TRITIATED DIGOXIN IN THE DOG: A COMPARISON OF DIGITALIS ADMINISTRATION WITH AND WITHOUT A "LOADING DOSE"

Frank I. Marcus, Josee Pavlovich, Linda Burkhalter and Carol Cuccia
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics June 1, 1967, 156 (3) 548-556;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Research ArticleArticle

THE METABOLIC FATE OF TRITIATED DIGOXIN IN THE DOG: A COMPARISON OF DIGITALIS ADMINISTRATION WITH AND WITHOUT A "LOADING DOSE"

Frank I. Marcus, Josee Pavlovich, Linda Burkhalter and Carol Cuccia
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics June 1, 1967, 156 (3) 548-556;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • CRV431 Decreases Liver Fibrosis and Tumor Development
  • Antagonist-Induced Reversal of Functional and Structural Measures of Hippocampal Benzodiazepine Tolerance
  • Interaction of Diclofenac and Quinidine in Monkeys: Stimulation of Diclofenac Metabolism
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About JPET
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-0103 (Online)

Copyright © 2022 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics