Nonclinical Evaluation of Novel Cationically Modified Polysaccharide Antidotes for Unfractionated Heparin

Bartlomiej Kalaska; Kamil Kaminski; Emilia Sokolowska; Dominik Czaplicki; Monika Kujdowicz; Krystyna Stalinska; Joanna Bereta; Krzysztof Szczubialka; Dariusz Pawlak; Maria Nowakowska; Andrzej Mogielnicki

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0119486

Abstract

Protamine, the only registered antidote of unfractionated heparin (UFH), may produce a number of adverse effects, such as anaphylactic shock or serious hypotension. We aimed to develop an alternative UFH antidote as efficient as protamine, but safer and easier to produce. As a starting material, we have chosen generally non-toxic, biocompatible, widely available, inexpensive, and easy to functionalize polysaccharides. Our approach was to synthesize, purify and characterize cationic derivatives of dextran, hydroxypropylcellulose, pullulan and γ-cyclodextrin, then to screen them for potential heparin-reversal activity using an in vitro assay and finally examine efficacy and safety of the most active polymers in Wistar rat and BALB/c mouse models of experimentally induced arterial and venous thrombosis. Efficacy studies included the measurement of thrombus formation, activated partial thromboplastin time, bleeding time, and anti-factor Xa activity; safety studies included the measurement of hemodynamic, hematologic and immunologic parameters. Linear, high molecular weight dextran substituted with glycidyltrimethylammonium chloride groups at a ratio of 0.65 per glucose unit (Dex40-GTMAC3) is the most potent and the safest UFH inhibitor showing activity comparable to that of protamine while possessing lower immunogenicity. Cationic polysaccharides of various structures neutralize UFH. Dex40-GTMAC3 is a promising and potentially better UFH antidote than protamine.

Citation: Kalaska B, Kaminski K, Sokolowska E, Czaplicki D, Kujdowicz M, Stalinska K, et al. (2015) Nonclinical Evaluation of Novel Cationically Modified Polysaccharide Antidotes for Unfractionated Heparin. PLoS ONE 10(3): e0119486. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119486

Academic Editor: Paulo Lee Ho, Instituto Butantan, BRAZIL

Received: October 16, 2014; Accepted: January 13, 2015; Published: March 17, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 Kalaska et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: The study was supported by National Science Centre Grant No. DEC-2011/03/B/NZ7/00755. BK was supported by funds from Leading National Research Center in Bialystok (31/KNOW/2013). KK was supported by National Science Centre Grant No. UMO-2013/09/D/ST5/03864. KK, KS, and MN acknowledge the financial support of the Foundation for Polish Science Team Programme co-financed by the EU European Regional Development Fund, PolyMed, TEAM/2008-2/6. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Although many new antithrombotic agents were introduced in the last few years, unfractionated heparin (UFH), an anionic polysaccharide, remains a key drug inhibiting blood coagulation in case of emergency. It enables open-heart surgery by preventing blood clotting in the heart-lung machine (cardiopulmonary bypass) oxygenating and supplying blood to the main body organs. After surgery almost all patients have to receive protamine: a cationic protein inactivating heparin and restoring coagulation; most would probably bleed to death without this antidote [1].

Kimmel et al. [2] predicted that 7% of these patients may die anyway because of serious side effects of protamine, such as anaphylactic shock, pulmonary vasoconstriction or systemic hypotension [3–6]. According to reports the incidence of protamine-related anaphylaxis varies from 0.2 to 10% [4,6]. In 2003 666,000 open-heart surgeries and 470,000 Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) procedures were performed within the USA [7]. Although in 2010 these numbers decreased by 15% due to more frequent percutaneous interventions [8], protamine usage increased in vascular surgery, such as fistula placement, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and other open abdominal surgeries, or transcatheter aortic valve implantations [9]. Thus, in the USA alone more than one thousand life-threatening complications a year could be attributed to the toxicity of protamine [8]. Allergy to fish may predispose to this acute response, because commercial protamine originates from sperm of salmon fished around Japan [10]. Since protamine is also used to slow down absorption and to prolong action of some insulins, diabetic patients might be prone to fatal allergic reactions [10,11]. European Medicines Agency alerted about potential supply shortage of protamine after Fukushima nuclear plant disaster. Obviously, because of the problematic supply source of protamine and safety reasons, a new heparin antidote is strongly desired. The quest for a safer alternative to protamine has a long history and has been exhaustively described in a recent review [12]. So far the pharmaceutical companies have suspended the development of a number of UFH antidotes, for example L-lysine [13], due to expensive large-scale synthesis. Thus, as a starting material for the synthesis of cationic polymers, we chose generally non-toxic, biocompatible, widely available, inexpensive, and easy to functionalize polysaccharides. We had previously explored the mechanism of UFH binding by modified polysaccharides such as chitosan [14,15], dextran [16,17], and hydroxypropylcellulose [16]. Their cationic groups attached to the polysaccharide chain bind to the anionic groups attached to the UFH chain and form inactive polycation-UFH complex.

In the present study we aimed to develop a new UFH antidote with full inhibitory potency, but safer and easier to produce than protamine. First, our team—consisting of chemists, pharmacologists and immunologists—synthesized and characterized several positively-charged polymers, whose structure, like that of heparin, is based on a polysaccharide main chain. The novel molecules originated from dextran, hydroxypropylcellulose, pullulan or γ-cyclodextrin and differed in the molecular weight, architecture and cationic charge density. Then, based on in vitro UFH binding assay we selected the most promising polymers and, finally, we compared the efficacy and safety of the most active agents in the animal models of thrombosis. We selected the most potent and safe heparin antidote using rat model of electrically-induced arterial thrombosis [18], which we found previously to be suitable for testing antithrombotic and anticoagulative effects of various agents [17,19–24]. We also evaluated immunogenic properties of selected novel polymers and compared them with protamine in a repeated-dose animal study.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Animals were purchased from and housed in the Centre of Experimental Medicine of Medical University of Bialystok in specific pathogen free conditions according to Good Laboratory Practice rules. 166 male Wistar rats and 45 BALB/c mice were used in all experiments. Animals were housed with a 12 h light/dark cycle in temperature (22 ± 2°C) and humidity (55 ± 5%) controlled room, grouped cages as appropriate, and allowed to have ad libitum access to sterilized tap water and a standard chow (Ssniff R-Z V1324). The animals’ health status was monitored throughout the experiments by a health surveillance programme according to Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations (FELASA) guidelines. The rats and mice were free of all viral, bacterial, and parasitic pathogens listed in the FELASA recommendations. All the procedures involving animals and their care were approved by Local Ethical Committee on Animal Testing at the Medical University of Bialystok (Permit Numbers 28/2012 and 15/2013) and by First Local Ethical Committee on Animal Testing at the Jagiellonian University in Krakow (Permit Number 92/2012) and conducted in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines [25], directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes and the national laws. Procedures were conducted in the light phase of cycle in the surgical room of our laboratory. All animals were euthanized by exsanguination at the end of experiments.

Chemicals and drugs

Dextran (Dex40, Mw = 40 kDa from Leuconostoc spp.; Dex6, Mw = 6 kDa from Leuconostoc spp.), hydroxypropylcellulose (HPC, Mn 10 kDa, Mw 80 kDa), pullulan (Pul, 200 kDa, from Aureobasidium pullulans), γ-cyclodextrin (GCD, ≥90.0% cyclodextrin basis (HPLC), N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC, ≥99.0%), N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS, 98%), l-arginine (reagent grade, ≥98% TLC), allylamine (≥99%), spermine (Spm, >97%), 2,2′-azobis(2-methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride (AAPH, 97%), N,N'-carbonyldiimidazole (CDI, reagent grade), N-acrylamidopropyl-N,N,N-trimethylammonium chloride (APTMAC, 75 wt% solution in water, stabilized with 3000 ppm MEHQ), glycidyltrimethylammonium chloride (GTMAC, technical ≥90%), benzoyl peroxide (BPO, 75% remainder water Luperox A75), heparin sodium salt from bovine intestinal mucosa (UFH), protamine (protamine sulfate salt from salmon, grade X), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF, analytical grade), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, analytical grade), trisodium citrate (≥99%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Germany). Dex1 (Mw = 1 kDa from Leuconostoc spp.) was purchased from Pharmacosmos (Denmark). Azure A chloride (Fluka standard) was purchased from Fluka (Switzerland). Acetone, ethanol 96%, methanol, potassium chloride, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, disodium hydrogen phosphate, sodium chloride, NaOH, were all analytical grade and purchased from POCh (Poland). Routine laboratory reagents to determine activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in plasma were purchased from Bio-Ksel (Poland). Anti-Xa assay kits were purchased from Sekisui Diagnostics (USA). Pentobarbital, ketamine, and xylazine were purchased from Biovet (Poland).

Polymer synthesis and characteristics

Polysaccharides substituted with GTMAC were synthesized using the general procedure described previously [16]. All the details of polymers synthesis and solubility are presented in S1 File. UV-Vis absorption spectra were recorded using an HP8452A diode-array spectrophotometer in 1-cm optical path quartz cells. The dimensions of the aggregates in aqueous suspensions were determined using Malvern Instruments Ltd Nano ZetaSizer. FTIR spectra were obtained using a Bruker IFS 48 spectrometer. NMR spectra were measured in D₂O using a Bruker AMX 500 spectrometer. GPC analyses were performed using a Waters GPC system equipped with a bank of three columns (PL Aquagel-OH 30, 40, and 60) and tandem PDA/RI detectors. The eluent was 0.1 M NaCl, flow rate was 0.6 ml·min^-1, sample volume was 150 μl, and the concentration of polymers was 5 g·l^-1.

Binding of UFH by the cationic polymers

The ability of the studied substances to bind UFH was assessed with a colorimetric method using Azure A, a cationic dye, as described previously [14,15]. Briefly, UFH chains, when present in the solution of Azure A, complex the dye molecules, which then form aggregates absorbing at 513 nm, while the monomeric form of the dye (in the absence of UFH) absorbs at 630 nm. Added polymer disrupts dye aggregates partially (or fully in the case of complete binding of UFH) and increases 630 nm and decreases 513 nm absorption band intensity. A representative example of the plot showing the dependence of free (i.e., uncomplexed and therefore possessing anticoagulant activity) UFH concentration on the cationic polymer concentration, expressed as the ratio of the cationic polymer mass and total UFH mass, is shown in Fig. 1.

Download:

Fig 1. Binding of UFH by the cationic polymers.

Dependence of free UFH concentration on the concentration of Dex6-GTMAC expressed as the ratio of the Dex6-GTMAC mass and total UFH mass. Data for protamine are shown for comparison.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119486.g001

Experimental arterial thrombosis in rats

84 male Wistar rats weighing 216 ± 10.8 g (no significant difference between groups) were randomly divided into 10 groups (8–10 per experimental group), anesthetized by an intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital (45 mg·kg^-1 b.w.) and placed in a supine position on a heated operation table. UFH was administered into right femoral vein in a volume not exceeding 0.5 ml·kg^-1 b.w. 10 min before the induction of thrombosis in dose of 300 U·kg^-1 b.w. alone or followed (3 min) by intravenous (iv) administration of Dex40-GTMAC2 (4.2 mg·kg^-1 b.w.), Dex40-GTMAC3 (2.5 and 7.5 mg·kg^-1 b.w.), Dex6-GTMAC (9.6 mg·kg^-1 b.w.), GCD-GTMAC2 (10.8 mg·kg^-1 b.w.), or protamine (3 mg·kg^-1 b.w.). Vehicle (PBS) treated animals served as a control group. Additionally, UFH was administered into right femoral vein of 16 male Wistar rats, weighing 209.7 ± 9.9 g in dose of 900 U·kg^-1 b.w. alone or followed by iv administration of Dex40-GTMAC3 (22.5 mg·kg^-1 b.w.). Dex40-GTMAC3 was also administered alone in dose of 7.5 mg·kg^-1 b.w. Arterial thrombosis was induced by electrical stimulation of the common carotid artery, according to methods previously described [18,26]. Briefly, the anode, a stainless steel L-shaped wire, was inserted under the artery and connected to a circuit with a constant current generator. The cathode was a subcutaneous metal needle attached to the hindlimb. The stimulation (1 mA) took 10 min. 45 min after stimulation the segment of the common carotid artery with the formed thrombus was clipped at both sides, dissected opened lengthwise and the thrombus was completely removed, air-dried in 37°C and weighed 24 h after the end of experiment. Thrombus weight was our primary endpoint, whereas coagulation markers measured in plasma served as secondary endpoints. After removal of formed thrombus blood samples were taken from the heart. The blood samples were drawn into 3.13% trisodium citrate in a volume ratio of 9:1, then centrifuged at 3500 x g at 4°C for 20 min and plasma was deep-frozen (-70°C) in aliquots of 1 ml until further assays could be performed. A time-line diagram of this experiment was presented in our previous publication [17].

Experimental venous thrombosis in mice

25 male BALB/c mice weighing 24.2 ± 0.2 g (no significant difference between groups) and aged 8–10 weeks were randomly divided into 4 groups (5–7 per experimental group). Animals were anesthetized with a mixture of ketamine (125 mg·kg^-1 b.w.) and xylazine (12.5 mg·kg^-1 b.w.). After the anesthesia animals were heparinized with 300 U·kg^-1 b.w. (50 μl iv into tail vein). Three minutes after injection, UFH was neutralized with protamine (3 mg·kg^-1 b.w.) or Dex40-GTMAC3 (7.5 mg·kg^-1 b.w.). The Electrolytic Inferior Vena Cava Model was performed as previously described [27]. Briefly, the abdomen was opened, and all inferior vena cava side branches were carefully ligated. The 25G stainless-steel needle was inserted into the exposed caudal vena cava and connected to a current source of 25 μA over 15 minutes (anode). After 15 minutes the needle was removed and abdomen was closed in a two-layer fashion. After six hours the animals were reanesthetized and the abdomen was reopened, the vena cava was carefully dissected and inspected for the presence of thrombus. The thrombus was kept at 37°C and after 24 hours its dry weight was measured.

Bleeding time in rats

The tail bleeding time was measured after removal of formed thrombus using a standardized Simplate device (Simplate II, Organon Teknika Corp., USA). The device makes two incisions 5 mm long and 1 mm deep on the dorsal part of the tail between 9 and 11 cm from the tip, taking care to avoid large veins. Immediately after injury, the tail was placed into the cylinder with isotonic saline at 37°C. Bleeding time was measured from the moment the tail was surgically cut until bleeding stopped completely (no rebleeding within 30 s). If bleeding was still present at the end of the 300 s observation period, a value of 300 s was ascribed for the sake of statistical analysis. Bleeding time was expressed in seconds.

aPTT measurement in rats and mice

The aPTT was measured in plasma collected from thrombotic rats or mice as a basic coagulation parameter used for monitoring of UFH action. Additionally, Dex40-GTMAC3 was assayed for potential anticoagulant activity by measuring of aPTT according to a modified procedure of Byun et al. [28]. The blood samples were taken from the heart of 5 male Wistar rats, and were drawn into 3.13% trisodium citrate in a volume ratio of 9:1, then centrifuged at 3500 × g at 4°C for 20 min and 200 μl of pooled plasma was mixed with 20 μl of a solution containing increasing concentrations of Dex40-GTMAC3. The aPTT values were automatically determined with an optical method (Coag-Chrom 3003; Bio-ksel, Poland) adding routine laboratory reagents to collected animal plasma.

Anti-factor Xa activity in rats

Anti-factor Xa activity was analyzed with ELISA technique at 25°C using a microplate reader (Dynex Tech., USA) according to the kit manufacturer instructions.

Blood cell count in rats

Blood cell count was assessed with an Animal Blood Counter (ABC Vet, Horiba, Germany) according to the manufacturer directions.

Blood pressure measurement in rats

The mean blood pressure (MBP) was measured directly through a cannula filled with UFH solution (150 U·ml^-1), placed in the left common carotid artery and connected to the pressure transducer (Plugsys, Transonics System, USA) in anaesthetized Wistar rats weighing 239.7 ± 7.2 g (no significant difference between groups), as described previously [29]. 74 Wistar rats were randomly divided into 16 groups (4–6 per experimental group). The schedule of drug administration was the same as in arterial thrombosis experiment. Additionally, polymers were administered alone in 3 times higher doses.

Immunization experiments

20 female BALB/c mice weighing 26.3 ± 0.5 g (no significant difference between groups) and aged 8–10 weeks were randomly divided into 4 groups (5 per experimental group). Animals were anesthetized with a mixture of ketamine (125 mg·kg^-1 b.w.) and xylazine (12.5 mg·kg^-1 b.w.) and were heparinized with 150 U·kg^-1 b.w. (50 μl iv into tail vein). Three minutes after injection, UFH was neutralized with protamine (1.5 mg·kg^-1 b.w.), or Dex40-GTMAC2 (6.25 mg·kg^-1 b.w.), or Dex40-GTMAC3 (3.75 mg·kg^-1 b.w.). All antidotes were injected iv into tail vein in 50 μl of saline, while the control group (UFH) was not administered any antidote. The heparinization/neutralization regimen was repeated 5 times, once every week (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29). Blood samples were collected from the tail vein of each mouse one day prior UFH administration and serum was isolated by centrifugation. One week after the last injection (day 36) all mice were sacrificed; final blood samples were collected and spleens of the animals were isolated for evaluation.

Immune response evaluation

The levels of antibodies specific to protamine, Dex40-GTMAC2, and Dex40-GTMAC3 were evaluated using standard indirect ELISA. Briefly, wells of a 96-well plate (Nunc MaxiSorp) were coated O/N at RT with 50 μl of antigen solution (25 μg·ml^-1 in PBS). The wells were blocked O/N with 200 μl of 1% BSA in PBS at 4°C. Serum samples were diluted in PBS, added to the wells washed with PBS, and incubated O/N at 4°C. Murine antibodies bound to the antigen were detected with horseradish peroxydase-conjugated secondary antibodies specific to mouse IgM (Sigma A8786, 1:5 000) or mouse IgG (Sigma A3673, 1:10 000). Colorimetric detection was based on TMB substrate solution (BD Biosciences) and the enzymatic reaction was stopped by adding 50 μl of 0.18 M H₂SO₄. ELISA signals were measured at 450 nm using VERSAmax microplate reader (Molecular Devices). All sera were tested on each antigen (protamine, Dex40-GTMAC2, and Dex40-GTMAC3) to detect potential cross-reactivity.

Statistical analysis

In the study, n refers to number of animals in each experimental group. For each test, the experimental unit was an individual animal. We choose the minimal number of animals to detect differences between each group basing on our and others experience using these procedures. The data are shown as mean ± SD and analyzed using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant, less than 0.01 highly significant and less than 0.001 extremely significant.

Results

Characteristics of the synthesized polymers

Table 1 shows characteristics of obtained polymers. Their structure varied in the type of: modified polysaccharide (Dex 1, 6 or 40 kDA, Pul, HPC or GCD), type of cationic group (GTMAC, APTMAC, Spm, PAH or PAH-ARG), degree of substitution, and charge expressed as zeta potential. All the details of elemental analysis, ¹H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy measurements are presented in S2 File.

Download:

Table 1. Characteristics of the polymers.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119486.t001

In vitro UFH binding by the cationic polymers

The concentration of free UFH in the solution decreased with increasing concentration of all the synthesized polymers, except for Dex1-GTMAC and GCD-GTMAC1. Generally, the polymers with lower degree of substitution with cationic groups bound UFH weaker than protamine i.e., their higher concentration was required to achieve the same decrease in free UFH concentration. The amount of polymers necessary for binding 90% of 1 mg of UFH was used as a measure of the binding efficiency. If this value exceeded the analogous value for protamine more than eight times the compound was disqualified from further biological studies. This value was also used for the preliminary assessment of the dose of a cationic polymer required in biological tests.

Reversal of the effects of UFH on the arterial thrombosis in rats

UFH dose dependently decreased the weight of arterial thrombus in rats. Studied agents reversed antithrombotic effect of UFH (Fig. 2). The polymers were administered in doses corresponding with the ratio of polymer/UFH estimated in the UFH binding assay. Dex40-GTMAC3 was the most potent and its effect was comparable to the effect of protamine. It also reversed the antithrombotic effect of UFH administered in dose of 900 U·kg^-1 b.w. (Fig. 2). Dex40-GTMAC2 administered in dose of 4.2 mg·kg^-1 b.w. was completely ineffective. When administered alone Dex40-GTMAC3 did not influence thrombus weight (0.98 ± 0.25 mg) in comparison to control group (0.92 ± 0.17 mg).

Download:

Fig 2. Reversal of the effects of UFH on the arterial thrombosis in rats.

Dry thrombus weight in Wistar rats treated with vehicle (PBS), UFH in dose of 300 or 900 U· kg^-1) alone or followed by Dex40-GTMAC2 (4.2 mg·kg^-1), Dex40-GTMAC3 (2.5, 7.5 or 22.5 mg·kg^-1), Dex6-GTMAC (9.6 mg·kg^-1), GCD-GTMAC2 (10.8 mg·kg-1), and protamine (3.0 mg·kg^-1), c-P<0.001 vs. vehicle; d-P<0.05, e-P<0.01 vs. UFH 300 U·kg^-1; l-P<0.001 vs. UFH 900 U·kg^-1, Mann-Whitney test. Results are shown as mean ± SD, n = 8–10.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119486.g002

Reversal of the effects of UFH on the venous thrombosis in mice

Similarly to the results in the model of the arterial thrombosis in rats, UFH significantly decreased thrombus weight and prolonged aPTT in mice developing electrically induced venous thrombosis. We confirmed the ability of Dex40-GTMAC3 to reverse antithrombotic and anticoagulant effects of UFH in mice (Fig. 3).

Download:

Fig 3. Reversal of the effects of UFH on the venous thrombosis and aPTT in mice.

Dry thrombus weight (A) and the aPTT (B) in mice treated with vehicle (PBS), UFH (300 U·kg^-1) alone or followed by Dex40-GTMAC3 (7.5 mg·kg^-1), and protamine (3.0 mg·kg^-1), b-P<0.01, c-P<0.001 vs. vehicle; e-P<0.01 vs. UFH 300 U·kg^-1; h-P<0.01 vs. UFH 300 U·kg^-1 + Protamine 3.0 mg·kg^-1, Mann-Whitney test. Results are shown as mean ± SD n = 5–7.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119486.g003

Influence of the cationic polymers on aPTT

In vivo, Dex40-GTMAC3, Dex6-GTMAC, GCD-GTMAC1, and protamine significantly shortened aPTT which was prolonged by earlier administration of UFH. We found that the effect of GCD-GTMAC2 was the weakest, whereas Dex40-GTMAC3 and protamine completely reversed the effects of UFH to the control value (Fig. 4). Dex40-GTMAC3 reversed also aPTT prolonged by 900 U·kg^-1 b.w. of UFH, and when administered alone slightly (by 30%), but significantly prolonged aPTT to 26.28 ± 6.94 seconds in comparison to 20.28 ± 1.08 seconds in control group (P<0.01).

Download:

Fig 4. Influence of the cationic polymers on aPTT in rats.

aPTT in Wistar rats treated with vehicle (PBS), UFH (300 U·kg^-1) alone or followed by Dex40-GTMAC2 (4.2 mg·kg^-1), Dex40-GTMAC3 (2.5 and 7.5 mg·kg^-1), Dex6-GTMAC (9.6 mg·kg^-1), GCD-GTMAC2 (10.8 mg·kg^-1), and protamine (3.0 mg·kg^-1), c-P<0.001 vs. vehicle; f-P<0.001 vs. UFH 300 U·kg^-1; i-P<0.001 vs. UFH 300 U·kg^-1 + Protamine 3.0 mg·kg^-1; l-P<0.001 vs. UFH 900 U·kg^-1, Mann-Whitney test. Results are shown as mean ± SD, n = 8–10.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119486.g004

In vitro, Dex40-GTMAC3 prolonged aPTT at higher concentration than 50 mg·l^-1 (Fig. 5).

Download:

Fig 5. aPTT in plasma of Wistar rats mixed with different concentrations of Dex40-GTMAC.

a-P<0.05, b-P<0.01 vs. vehicle, Mann-Whitney test. Results are shown as mean ± SD, n = 5.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119486.g005

Reversal of tail bleeding time by the cationic polymers

Similarly to aPTT measurement, UFH prolonged the tail transection bleeding time. Dex40-GTMAC3 in the dose of 2.5 mg·kg^-1 b.w., Dex6-GTMAC and GCD-GTMAC2 partially but significantly shortened bleeding time prolonged by 300 U·kg^-1 b.w. of UFH (Fig. 6). When administered in the ratio of 2.5 mg for every 100 U·kg^-1 b.w of UFH, Dex40-GTMAC3 completely reversed tail bleeding time prolonged by 300 or 900 U·kg^-1 b.w of UFH to the control value (Fig. 6). Dex40-GTMAC3 administered alone did influence bleeding time (111.3 ± 18.9 sec.) in comparison to vehicle (104.3 ± 4.6 sec.).

Download:

Fig 6. Reversal of tail bleeding time by the cationic polymers.

Tail bleeding time in Wistar rats treated with vehicle (PBS), UFH in dose of 300 or 900 U·kg^-1 alone or followed by Dex40-GTMAC2 (4.2 mg·kg^-1), Dex40-GTMAC3 (2.5, 7.5 or 22.5 mg·kg^-1), Dex6-GTMAC (9.6 mg·kg^-1), GCD-GTMAC2 (10.8 mg·kg^-1), and protamine (3.0 mg·kg^-1), c-P<0.001 vs. vehicle; e-P<0.01, f-P<0.001 vs. UFH 300 U·kg^-1; h-P<0.01, i-P<0.001 vs. UFH 300 U·kg^-1 + Protamine 3.0 mg·kg^-1; l-P<0.001 vs. UFH 900 U·kg^-1, Mann-Whitney test. Results are shown as mean ± SD, n = 8–10.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119486.g006

Reversal of plasma anti-Xa activity by the cationic polymers

Dex40-GTMAC3 and protamine significantly reversed increase of anti-Xa activity in UFH-treated animals (Fig. 7). Other polymers were completely or partially ineffective.

Download:

Fig 7. Reversal of plasma anti-fXa activity by the cationic polymers.

Anti-fXa activity in Wistar rats treated with vehicle (PBS), UFH (300 U·kg^-1) alone or followed by Dex40-GTMAC2 (4.2 mg·kg^-1), Dex40-GTMAC3 (2.5 and 7.5 mg·kg^-1), Dex6-GTMAC (9.6 mg·kg^-1), GCD-GTMAC2 (10.8 mg·kg^-1), and protamine (3.0 mg·kg^-1), c-P<0.001 vs. vehicle; f-P<0.001 vs. UFH 300 U·kg^-1; i-P<0.001 vs. UFH 300 U·kg^-1 + Protamine 3.0 mg·kg^-1, Mann-Whitney test. Results are shown as mean ± SD, n = 8–10.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119486.g007

Blood count

UFH significantly increased white blood cells (WBC). This increase of WBC was completely reversed to control value by protamine injection. All modified polymers partially, but significantly, inhibited increase of WBC in UFH treated animals. Only Dex40-GTMAC3 did not change any other blood count. GCD-GTMAC2 significantly changed red blood cell count, hemoglobin, and hematocrit values. All results are presented in Table 2.

Download:

Table 2. Body weights and complete blood count results after arterial thrombosis stimulation in rats, means ± SD.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119486.t002

Effects of the cationic polymers on blood pressure in rats

MBP courses in rats one hour after administration of the polymers and protamine are presented in Fig. A and B in S3 File. The maximum magnitude of MBP change is shown in Fig. 8A. MBP decreased in groups treated with modified Dex and protamine whereas it increased in animals treated with cationic GCD. In the group treated with Dex40-GTMAC2 MBP decreased by almost half in 15^th minute if the polymer was injected alone in the dose that efficiently reversed previous anticoagulant effects of UFH. We also found significant, but much weaker and temporary change of MBP shortly after administration of Dex40-GTMAC3 (decrease in MBP) and GCD-GTMAC2 (increase in MBP). Further increasing of the doses resulted in sustained significant drop in MBP in all animals including protamine treated group. If UFH was injected 3 minutes before the administration of the cationic polymers, only Dex40-GTMAC2 and Dex6-GTMAC decreased MBP by 13 and 11%, respectively, whereas Dex40-GTMAC3 and protamine did not (Fig. 8B). One polymer (Dex40-PAH-Arg) was extremely hypotensive, and three others (Dex40-Spm, Pul-GTMAC and HPC-APTMAC2) were lethal. Thus, we discontinued studying of these polymers. The results of experiment preformed in one rat are presented in Fig. C in S3 File.

Download:

Fig 8. Effects of the cationic polymers on blood pressure in rats.

MBP change registered 60 min after iv administration of Dex40-GTMAC2 (4.2 and 12.5 mg·kg^-1), Dex40-GTMAC3 (2.5, 7.5, and 22.5 mg·kg^-1), Dex6-GTMAC (9.6 and 28.8 mg·kg^-1), GCD-GTMAC2 (10.8 and 32.4 mg·kg^-1), and protamine (3.0 and 9.0 mg·kg^-1) (A) and UFH (300 U·kg^-1) followed by the injection of Dex40-GTMAC2 (12.5 mg·kg^-1), Dex40-GTMAC3 (7.5 mg·kg^-1), Dex6-GTMAC (9.6 mg·kg^-1), GCD-GTMAC2 (10.8 mg·kg^-1), and protamine (3.0 mg·kg^-1) (B), a-P<0.05, b-P<0.01 vs. vehicle, Mann-Whitney test. Results are shown as mean ±SD, n = 4–6.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119486.g008

Evaluation of the immune response to the cationic polymers

Since no control antibodies specific to protamine, Dex40-GTMAC2, and Dex40-GTMAC3 were available, antigen coating in ELISA was confirmed with spectroscopic and colorimetric methods. Both early (IgM-class) and mature (IgG-class) phases of humoral immune response were evaluated. No IgM antibodies specific to any of the antigens were detected. Given low affinity of emerging IgM-class immunoglobulins in early immune response, it is possible that weakly-binding unspecific background antibodies produced most of the ELISA signal. IgG-class response, however, was detectable in all mice in the protamine group beginning from day 21^st on. On day 36 the mean protamine-specific IgG signal in the protamine group was significantly higher than the background signal in the UFH group (P<0.01). In contrast to this result, no significant levels of IgG specific to Dex40-GTMAC2 and Dex40-GTMAC3 were detected (Fig. 9). To further evaluate an immunogenic potential of the antigens tested, we measured and weighed spleens of all animals in the immunization experiments since strong immunogens are known to induce splenomegaly. However, no significant differences in spleen size or weight were detected in any of the experimental groups.

Download:

Fig 9. Evaluation of the immune response to the cationic polymers.

Humoral immune response evaluation by ELISA on day 36 of the experiment. The levels of IgG specific toward different UFH inhibitors in individual mice presented as values of absorbance in ELISA test. The inserted graph shows mean ELISA signals corresponding to the levels of anti-protamine-, anti-Dex40-GTMAC2- or Dex40-GTMAC3-IgG present in sera of mice immunized with matching UFH-antidotes (gray bars) compared to the signals from sera of control mice treated with UFH alone (black bars). All sera applied in 1:100 dilution, b-P<0.01, Mann-Whitney test. Results are shown as mean ± SD, n = 5.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119486.g009

Discussion

The main goal of the study presented in this paper was to search for a new UFH antidote that would be safer than protamine, while having similar antiheparin potency. Among fourteen initially synthesized cationic derivatives of polysaccharides with various structures (both linear and cyclic), molecular weights (from 1 up to 200 kDa), and charge densities (degree of substitution with cationic groups ranging from 0.1 to more than 4), using in vitro and in vivo assays we found the most potent and the safest one.

Present work is a continuation of our previous studies on dextran and hydroxypropylcellulose, and included two new polysaccharides, i.e., pullulan and γ-cyclodextrin, while we discontinued experiments on chitosan-based polymer. We disqualified some of the obtained polysaccharides at a quite early stage of the studies. One polymer was poorly soluble (Dex40-PAH), while five others (Dex1-GTMAC, Dex40-GTMAC1, Dex40-APTMAC, GCD-GTMAC1, and HPC-APTMAC1) lacked in vitro UFH binding activity, the property we considered a prerequisite, probably due to low cationic charge density. The remaining eight polymers, all of which successfully passed in vitro tests, were qualified for further experiments. We found that four of them (Dex40-Spm, Dex40-PAH-Arg, Pul-GTMAC and HPC-APTMAC2) were lethal or extremely hypotensive at the preliminary stages of the in vivo study, thus experiments on those derivatives were discontinued to reduce the number of scarified animals according the 3R rule. Finally, we evaluated in vivo four polymers: Dex6-GTMAC, Dex40-GTMAC2, Dex40-GTMAC3, and GCD-GTMAC2. Among them the performance of Dex40-GTMAC2 was the poorest. When administered in non-hypotensive dose, it did not inhibit anticoagulatory and antithrombotic activity of UFH, although it lacked immunogenicity. All three remaining polymers significantly reversed action of UFH. We expected good efficacy in the case of Dex40-GTMAC3, as we had previously found partial antiheparin activity of a similar, but less cationic, 40 kDa dextran [17]. The results with GCD-GTAC2 were also not surprising, since others showed that a cationic polymer with a cyclic structure (PM102) successfully binds heparins [31] and a β-cyclodextrin-containing polycation neutralizes anionic aptamer-based anticoagulants [32]. However, the heparin reversal property of Dex6-GTMAC was unexpected and here we report for the first time strong antiheparin activity of a low molecular weight (6 kDa) cationic dextran.

Among these three promising polymers, we found that Dex40-GTMAC3 is the most potent and the safest antidote of UFH. Unlike Dex40-GTMAC3, Dex6-GTMAC decreased, and GCD-GTMAC increased red blood cell count, hematocrit and hemoglobin values. Dex6-GTMAC was hypotensive when administered in efficient antiheparin dose together with UFH. Similarly to others [32], we observed increase of MBP after intravenous injection of cationic β-cyclodextrin, alone or with UFH. In contrast, all hematological and hemodynamic values of animals receiving Dex40-GTMAC3 remained within error of their baseline level. Only Dex40-GTMAC3 and protamine comparably and fully restored the parameters of the thrombosis development, i.e., thrombus weight and bleeding time, and typical measures of heparins action, i.e., aPTT and anti-fXa activity, to control values. Moreover, Dex40-GTMAC3 did not elicit a detectable humoral immune response at doses that allow for complete neutralisation of UFH. The heparinisation/neutralisation regimen in BALB/c mice was repeated 5 times, once every week. This was aimed to mimic the clinical situation of dialysis patients, who are exposed to frequent heparin administration and reversal. In contrast, protamine—even if used at lower doses than Dex40-GTMAC3—was immunogenic in all animals and induced strong IgG responses. While this difference in immunogenic potential may be caused by the very chemical nature of the reversal agents (protein vs. polysaccharide), it can have significant clinical implications if the novel heparin reversal agents are to be used in medical practice.

According to summary of product characteristics, 300 U·kg^-1 b.w. of UFH is a maximal single dose used during cardiopulmonary bypass, thus higher dose of UFH may be considered as overdose. In order to simulate emergency or overdosage of UFH we administered a dose of 3 x 300 U·kg^-1 b.w. We found that Dex40-GTMAC3 again completely reversed antithrombotic and anticoagulant activity of UFH. It is known that protamine administered in doses exceeding the ratio of 1 mg per 100 U of UFH may exert anticoagulant activity [30]. We found that Dex40-GTMAC3 administered alone to rat in dose of 7.5 mg·kg^-1 b.w. clinically insignificantly prolonged aPTT, without changing of thrombus weight, bleeding time and blood pressure. However, the results of in vitro aPTT assay (2 x aPTT prolongation at concentration of 100 mg·l^-1) and the blood pressure measurement (37 mmHg decrease caused by Dex40-GTMAC3 administered in dose of 22.5 mg·kg^-1 b.w.) indicated that, similarly to protamine, significant exceeding the ratio of 2.5 mg·kg^-1 b.w. of Dex40-GTMAC3 per 100 U of UFH could not be well tolerated by patients. It seems that positively charged compounds at high concentrations (higher than therapeutic) exert antithrombotic activity themselves, and the mechanism could be associated with their hypotensive activity. Nevertheless, in contrast to delparantag—a novel, very promising reversal agent of UFH/low molecular weight heparin/pentasaccharide, in case of which the enrolment to clinical trial was stopped because of significant hypotension [9], Dex40-GTMAC3 is normotensive in therapeutic doses.

The interspecies differences between rodents and human can often be a reason of drug discovery failure. They are even more important in the evaluation of agents used in the treatment of complex haemostasis and hemodynamic disorders. To make the data on the inhibition of antithrombotic activity of UFH more meaningful we also examined the efficacy of the Dex40-GTMAC3 in mice using a model of thrombosis in which the lesion was produced inside abdominal vein, simulating contact of blood with thrombogenic surface [27]. Moreover, in this model the time of observation was extended to 6 hours to be closer to long open heart surgeries.

In contrast to many studies focusing on heparin-binding properties of protamine alternatives, for example lactoferrin [33], methylene blue, vancomycin, hexadimethrine bromide [34], or chemically-modified inactive antithrombin [35], Dex40-GTMAC3 efficacy was confirmed in vitro and in vivo in both mice and rats. Nevertheless, we are aware that further primate studies and clinical trial are required to confirm efficacy and safety in humans. Several UFH antidotes that had been promising in vitro failed at the later stages of development. For example, the recombinant human fVIIa given to patients increased the incidence of venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, and myocardial infarction [36]. Platelet factor 4 as heparin antidote did not complete clinical trial, probably due to safety reasons (it increases the risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia) [37,38].

In agreement with other reports [39], we found that protamine is immunogenic, whereas Dex40-GTMAC3 is not. This is an important advantage of Dex40-GTMAC3 over the protamine and alternative UHF reversal agents. Other protein-based antidotes, such as heparinase I [40], lactoferrin [33], or low molecular weight protamine [41,42] may induce immunogenic responses similar to protamine. Moreover, availability of Dex40-GTMAC3 does not depend on natural fish sources, which is the case of protamine sulfate. Lack of detectable immune response towards Dex40-GTMAC3 indicates that, in contrast to protamine, it could be safely administered to patients with fish allergy and to diabetics treated with protamine insulin.

It was suggested that some complications of cardiopulmonary bypass, such as bleeding or thrombotic risk, thrombocytopenia, or neurological disorders [43–46] could be related to administration of high doses of protamine [47]. However, it is very hard to separate effects of protamine treatment from those related to the use of cardiopulmonary bypass in clinical studies. Our experimental study to some extent supplements incomplete preclinical safety profile of protamine, pointing on its hypotensive and immunogenic properties.

Many polymers in our study were excluded during in vitro screening phase or after injection to just a few animals due to their toxicity. We showed here these negative data, because they may be valuable for others to exclude these compounds from their in vivo studies, even in different areas of application. For example, cationic polymers have been applied as gene carriers in nonviral gene therapy [48] and as drug delivery systems [49]; their potential use as anticancer drugs has also been suggested [50]. Moreover, a hydrogel containing GTMAC-modified polysaccharide can be applied to cell encapsulation and protein delivery [51,52]. Based on our results we can claim that high molecular weight linear polymers perform better as therapeutics than the cyclic or low molecular weight cationic polysaccharides.

We are aware that approving a first-in-man study will require not only pharmacodynamics and general safety data, but also pharmacokinetics, organ distribution and toxicity studies. The results may exclude Dex40-GTMAC3 from further development, thus we keep searching for agents in different polymer classes. We have recently shown that polyallylamine containing arginine moieties (PAH-ARG) could be a promising agent neutralizing protamine [23].

In conclusion, our team developed a novel, potent and safe heparin antidote—Dex40-GTMAC3, a 40 kDa dextran substituted with 0.65 GTMAC groups per a glucose unit on the average. Basing on our non-clinical evaluation of Dex40-GTMAC3 and taking into account the preclinical registration data and clinical safety literature of protamine, we believe that the novel polymer has very promising properties and can potentially substitute protamine as the UFH antidote.

Supporting Information

S1 File. Synthesis of polymers.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119486.s001

(PDF)

S2 File. Characteristics of the polymers.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119486.s002

(PDF)

S3 File. Mean blood pressure course in rats one hour after administration of the polymers and protamine.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119486.s003

(PDF)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: BK AM KK K. Szczubialka MN DC JB. Performed the experiments: BK ES AM KK MK K. Szczubialka DC K. Stalinska. Analyzed the data: BK ES AM KK K. Szczubialka MN DC K. Stalinska JB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: KK MK K. Szczubialka MN. Wrote the paper: BK DP AM KK K. Szczubialka MN DC JB.

References

1. Baglin T, Barrowcliffe TW, Cohen A, Greaves M. Guidelines on the use and monitoring of heparin. Br J Haematol. 2006;133: 19–34. pmid:16512825
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Kimmel SE, Sekeres M, Berlin JA, Ellison N. Mortality and adverse events after protamine administration in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth Analg. 2002;94: 1402–1408. pmid:12031996
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Levy JH, Schwieger IM, Zaidan JR, Faraj BA, Weintraub WS. Evaluation of patients at risk for protamine reactions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989;98: 200–204. pmid:2755152
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Weiler JM, Gellhaus MA, Carter JG, Meng RL, Benson PM, Hottel RA, et al. A prospective study of the risk of an immediate adverse reaction to protamine sulfate during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1990;85: 713–719. pmid:2182695
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Protamine Sulphate Injection, USP (package insert). Schaumburg, IL: APP Pharmaceuticals, LLC; 2008.
6. Nybo M, Madsen JS. Serious anaphylactic reactions due to protamine sulfate: A systematic literature review. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008;103: 192–196. pmid:18816305
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Thom T, Haase N, Rosamond W, Howard VJ, Rumsfeld J, Manolio T, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2006 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2006;113: e85–e151. pmid:16407573
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, et al. American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics—2013 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;127: 143–152. pmid:23283859
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Mahan CE. A 1-year drug utilization evaluation of protamine in hospitalized patients to identify possible future roles of heparin and low molecular weight heparin reversal agents. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2014;37: 271–278. pmid:23653171
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Nel L, Eren E. Peri-operative anaphylaxis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;71: 647–658. pmid:21235622
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Chu YQ, Cai LJ, Jiang DC, Jia D, Yan SY, Wang YQ. Allergic shock and death associated with protamine administration in a diabetic patient. Clin Ther. 2010;32: 1729–1732. pmid:21194595
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Bromfield SM, Wilde E, Smith DK. Heparin sensing and binding—taking supramolecular chemistry towards clinical applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42: 9184–9195. pmid:24019031
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Ma X, Mohammad SF, Kim SW. Heparin removal from blood using poly(L-lysine) immobilized hollow fiber. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1992;40: 530–536. pmid:18601148
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Kaminski K, Zazakowny K, Szczubialka K, Nowakowska M. pH-Sensitive genipin-cross-linked chitosan microspheres for heparin removal. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9: 3127–3132. pmid:18942790
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Kaminski K, Szczubialka K, Zazakowny K, Lach R, Nowakowska M. Chitosan derivatives as novel potential heparin reversal agents. J Med Chem. 2010;53: 4141–4147. pmid:20423087
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Kaminski K, Plonka M, Ciejka J, Szczubialka K, Nowakowska M, Lorkowska B, et al. Cationic derivatives of dextran and hydroxypropylcellulose as novel potential heparin antagonists. J Med Chem. 2011;54: 6586–6596. pmid:21866887
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Kalaska B, Sokolowska E, Kaminski K, Szczubialka K, Kramkowski K, Mogielnicki A, et al. Cationic derivative of dextran reverses anticoagulant activity of unfractionated heparin in animal models of arterial and venous thrombosis. Eur J Pharmacol. 2012;5: 81–89.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Schumacher WA, Heran CL, Youssef S, Megill JR, Michel I, Durham SK. Comparison of a thromboxane receptor antagonist and aspirin in experimental arterial thrombosis. Haemostasis. 1993;23: 219–228. pmid:8314172
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Mogielnicki A, Kramkowski K, Pietrzak L, Buczko W. N-methylnicotinamide inhibits arterial thrombosis in hypertensive rats. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2007;58: 515–527. pmid:17928647
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Chlopicki S, Swies J, Mogielnicki A, Buczko W, Bartus M, Lomnicka M, et al. 1-Methylnicotinamide (MNA), a primary metabolite of nicotinamide, exerts anti-thrombotic activity mediated by a cyclooxygenase-2/prostacyclin pathway. Br J Pharmacol. 2007;152: 230–239. pmid:17641676
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Kramkowski K, Leszczynska A, Mogielnicki A, Chlopicki S, Fedorowicz A, Grochal E, et al. Antithrombotic properties of water-soluble carbon monoxide-releasing molecules. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012;32: 2149–2157. pmid:22772756
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Kalaska B, Piotrowski L, Leszczynska A, Michalowski B, Kramkowski K, Kaminski T, et al. Antithrombotic effects of pyridinium compounds formed from trigonelline upon coffee roasting. J Agric Food Chem. 2014;62: 2853–2860. pmid:24650005
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Kaminski K, Kalaska B, Koczurkiewicz P, Michalik M, Szczubialka K, Mogielnicki A, et al. New arginine substituted derivative of poly(allylamine hydrochloride) for heparin reversal. MedChemComm. 2014;5: 489–495.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Kaminska M, Mogielnicki A, Stankiewicz A, Kramkowski K, Domaniewski T, Buczko W, et al. Angiotensin II via AT1 receptor accelerates arterial thrombosis in renovascular hypertensive rats. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2005;56: 571–585. pmid:16391415
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. McGrath JC, Drummond GB, McLachlan EM, Kilkenny C, Wainwright CL. Guidelines for reporting experiments involving animals: the ARRIVE guidelines. Br J Pharmacol. 2010;160: 1573–1576. pmid:20649560
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Guarini S. A highly reproducible model of arterial thrombosis in rats. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 1996; 35: 101–105. pmid:8729436
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Diaz JA, Wrobleski SK, Hawley AE, Lucchesi BR, Wakefield TW, Myers DD Jr. Electrolytic inferior vena cava model (EIM) of venous thrombosis. J Vis Exp. 2011;53: 27–37.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Byun Y, Singh VK, Yang VC. Low molecular weight protamine: a potential nontoxic heparin antagonist. Thromb Res. 1999;94: 53–61. pmid:10213181
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Mogielnicki A, Chabielska E, Pawlak R, Szemraj J, Buczko W. Angiotensin II enhances thrombosis development in renovascular hypertensive rats. Thromb Haemost. 2005;93: 1069–1076. pmid:15968390
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Bull BS, Hay KL, Herrmann PC. Postoperative bypass-associated dilutional (BAD) coagulopathy? Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2009;43: 256–259. pmid:19699663
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Cushing DJ, Cooper WD, Cohen ML, McVoy JRS, Sobel M, Harris RB. Reversal of heparin-induced increases in aPTT in the rat by PM102, a novel heparin antagonist. Eur J Pharmacol. 2010;635: 165–170. pmid:20307530
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Oney S, Lam RTS, Bompiani KM, Blake CM, Quick G, Heidel JD, et al. Development of universal antidotes to control aptamer activity. Nat Med. 2009;15: 1224–1228. pmid:19801990
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Wu HF, Lundblad RL, Church FC. Neutralization of heparin activity by neutrophil lactoferrin. Blood. 1995;85: 421–428. pmid:7811995
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Kikura M, Lee MK, Levy JH. Heparin neutralization with methylene blue, hexadimethrine, or vancomycin after cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth Analg. 1996;83: 223–227. pmid:8694296
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Fazavana J, Bianchini EP, Saller F, Smadja C, Picard V, Taverna M, et al. A chemically-modified inactive antithrombin as a potent antagonist of fondaparinux and heparin anticoagulant activity. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11: 1128–1136. pmid:23581397
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Johansson PI. Off-label use of recombinant factor VIIa for treatment of haemorrhage: results from randomized clinical trials. Vox Sang. 2008;95: 1–7. pmid:18460058
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Kelton JG, Smith JW, Warkentin TE, Hayward CP, Denomme GA, Horsewood P. Immunoglobulin G from patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia binds to a complex of heparin and platelet factor 4. Blood. 1994;83: 3232–3239. pmid:8193358
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Visentin GP, Ford SE, Scott JP, Aster RH. Antibodies from patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia/thrombosis are specific for platelet factor 4 complexed with heparin or bound to endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1994;93: 81–88. pmid:8282825
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Bakchoul T, Zöllner H, Amiral J, Panzer S, Selleng S, Kohlmann T, et al. Anti-protamine-heparin antibodies: Incidence, clinical relevance, and pathogenesis. Blood. 2013;121: 2821–2827. pmid:23325832
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Stafford-Smith M, Lefrak EA, Qazi AG, Welsby IJ, Barber L, Hoeft A, et al. Efficacy and safety of heparinase I versus protamine in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesthesiology. 2005;103: 229–240. pmid:16052104
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Lee LM, Chang LC, Wrobleski S, Wakefield TW, Yang VC. Low molecular weight protamine as nontoxic heparin/low molecular weight heparin antidote (III): Preliminary in vivo evaluation of efficacy and toxicity using a canine model. AAPS PharmSci. 2001;3: E19. pmid:11741270
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Liang JF, Zhen L, Chang LC, Yang VC. A less toxic heparin antagonist—low molecular weight protamine. Biochemistry (Moscow). 2003;68: 116–120. pmid:12693985
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Woodman RC, Harker LA. Bleeding complications associated with cardiopulmonary bypass. Blood. 1990;76: 1680–1697. pmid:2224118
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Singer RL, Mannion JD, Bauer TL, Armenti FR, Edie RN. Complications from heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Chest. 1993;104: 1436–1440. pmid:8222802
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Colman RW. Hemostatic complications of cardiopulmonary bypass. Am J Hematol. 1995;48: 267–272. pmid:7536391
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. McDonagh DL, Berger M, Mathew JP, Graffagnino C, Milano CA, Newman MF. Neurological complications of cardiac surgery. The Lancet Neurology. 2014;13: 490–502. pmid:24703207
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Shigeta O, Kojima H, Hiramatsu Y, Jikuya T, Terada Y, Atsumi N, et al. Low-dose protamine based on heparin-protamine titration method reduces platelet dysfunction after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;118: 354–360. pmid:10425010
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Anderson WF. Human gene therapy. Science. 1992;8: 808–13.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
49. Karewicz A, Szczubialka K, Nowakowska M. Cationic polymers in drug delivery. In: Samal SK, Dubruel P, editors. Cationic polymers in regenerative medicine. Royal Society of Chemistry; 2015. pp. 296–320.
50. El-Aneed A. An overview of current delivery systems in cancer gene therapy. J Control Rel. 2004;94: 1–14.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
51. Shi W, Ji Y, Zhang X, Shu S, Wu Z. Characterization of ph- and thermosensitive hydrogel as a vehicle for controlled protein delivery. J Pharm Sci. 2011;100: 886–895. pmid:20862775
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
52. Bulwan M, Antosiak-Iwańska M, Godlewska E, Granicka L, Zapotoczny S, Nowakowska M. Chitosan-Based Nanocoatings for Hypothermic Storage of Living Cells. Macromol Biosci. 2013;13: 1610–1620. pmid:23966342
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Baglin T, Barrowcliffe TW, Cohen A, Greaves M. Guidelines on the use and monitoring of heparin. Br J Haematol. 2006;133: 19–34. pmid:16512825
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Kimmel SE, Sekeres M, Berlin JA, Ellison N. Mortality and adverse events after protamine administration in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth Analg. 2002;94: 1402–1408. pmid:12031996
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Levy JH, Schwieger IM, Zaidan JR, Faraj BA, Weintraub WS. Evaluation of patients at risk for protamine reactions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989;98: 200–204. pmid:2755152
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Weiler JM, Gellhaus MA, Carter JG, Meng RL, Benson PM, Hottel RA, et al. A prospective study of the risk of an immediate adverse reaction to protamine sulfate during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1990;85: 713–719. pmid:2182695
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Protamine Sulphate Injection, USP (package insert). Schaumburg, IL: APP Pharmaceuticals, LLC; 2008.

[ref6] 6. Nybo M, Madsen JS. Serious anaphylactic reactions due to protamine sulfate: A systematic literature review. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008;103: 192–196. pmid:18816305
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[19] View Article

[20] PubMed/NCBI

[21] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Thom T, Haase N, Rosamond W, Howard VJ, Rumsfeld J, Manolio T, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2006 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2006;113: e85–e151. pmid:16407573
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] PubMed/NCBI

[25] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, et al. American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics—2013 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;127: 143–152. pmid:23283859
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[27] View Article

[28] PubMed/NCBI

[29] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Mahan CE. A 1-year drug utilization evaluation of protamine in hospitalized patients to identify possible future roles of heparin and low molecular weight heparin reversal agents. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2014;37: 271–278. pmid:23653171
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[31] View Article

[32] PubMed/NCBI

[33] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Nel L, Eren E. Peri-operative anaphylaxis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;71: 647–658. pmid:21235622
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[35] View Article

[36] PubMed/NCBI

[37] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Chu YQ, Cai LJ, Jiang DC, Jia D, Yan SY, Wang YQ. Allergic shock and death associated with protamine administration in a diabetic patient. Clin Ther. 2010;32: 1729–1732. pmid:21194595
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[39] View Article

[40] PubMed/NCBI

[41] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Bromfield SM, Wilde E, Smith DK. Heparin sensing and binding—taking supramolecular chemistry towards clinical applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42: 9184–9195. pmid:24019031
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[43] View Article

[44] PubMed/NCBI

[45] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Ma X, Mohammad SF, Kim SW. Heparin removal from blood using poly(L-lysine) immobilized hollow fiber. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1992;40: 530–536. pmid:18601148
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] PubMed/NCBI

[49] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Kaminski K, Zazakowny K, Szczubialka K, Nowakowska M. pH-Sensitive genipin-cross-linked chitosan microspheres for heparin removal. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9: 3127–3132. pmid:18942790
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] PubMed/NCBI

[53] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Kaminski K, Szczubialka K, Zazakowny K, Lach R, Nowakowska M. Chitosan derivatives as novel potential heparin reversal agents. J Med Chem. 2010;53: 4141–4147. pmid:20423087
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[55] View Article

[56] PubMed/NCBI

[57] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Kaminski K, Plonka M, Ciejka J, Szczubialka K, Nowakowska M, Lorkowska B, et al. Cationic derivatives of dextran and hydroxypropylcellulose as novel potential heparin antagonists. J Med Chem. 2011;54: 6586–6596. pmid:21866887
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[59] View Article

[60] PubMed/NCBI

[61] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Kalaska B, Sokolowska E, Kaminski K, Szczubialka K, Kramkowski K, Mogielnicki A, et al. Cationic derivative of dextran reverses anticoagulant activity of unfractionated heparin in animal models of arterial and venous thrombosis. Eur J Pharmacol. 2012;5: 81–89.
View Article
Google Scholar

[63] View Article

[64] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Schumacher WA, Heran CL, Youssef S, Megill JR, Michel I, Durham SK. Comparison of a thromboxane receptor antagonist and aspirin in experimental arterial thrombosis. Haemostasis. 1993;23: 219–228. pmid:8314172
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] PubMed/NCBI

[68] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Mogielnicki A, Kramkowski K, Pietrzak L, Buczko W. N-methylnicotinamide inhibits arterial thrombosis in hypertensive rats. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2007;58: 515–527. pmid:17928647
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Chlopicki S, Swies J, Mogielnicki A, Buczko W, Bartus M, Lomnicka M, et al. 1-Methylnicotinamide (MNA), a primary metabolite of nicotinamide, exerts anti-thrombotic activity mediated by a cyclooxygenase-2/prostacyclin pathway. Br J Pharmacol. 2007;152: 230–239. pmid:17641676
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Kramkowski K, Leszczynska A, Mogielnicki A, Chlopicki S, Fedorowicz A, Grochal E, et al. Antithrombotic properties of water-soluble carbon monoxide-releasing molecules. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012;32: 2149–2157. pmid:22772756
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Kalaska B, Piotrowski L, Leszczynska A, Michalowski B, Kramkowski K, Kaminski T, et al. Antithrombotic effects of pyridinium compounds formed from trigonelline upon coffee roasting. J Agric Food Chem. 2014;62: 2853–2860. pmid:24650005
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Kaminski K, Kalaska B, Koczurkiewicz P, Michalik M, Szczubialka K, Mogielnicki A, et al. New arginine substituted derivative of poly(allylamine hydrochloride) for heparin reversal. MedChemComm. 2014;5: 489–495.
View Article
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Kaminska M, Mogielnicki A, Stankiewicz A, Kramkowski K, Domaniewski T, Buczko W, et al. Angiotensin II via AT1 receptor accelerates arterial thrombosis in renovascular hypertensive rats. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2005;56: 571–585. pmid:16391415
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[89] View Article

[90] PubMed/NCBI

[91] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. McGrath JC, Drummond GB, McLachlan EM, Kilkenny C, Wainwright CL. Guidelines for reporting experiments involving animals: the ARRIVE guidelines. Br J Pharmacol. 2010;160: 1573–1576. pmid:20649560
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] PubMed/NCBI

[95] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Guarini S. A highly reproducible model of arterial thrombosis in rats. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 1996; 35: 101–105. pmid:8729436
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[97] View Article

[98] PubMed/NCBI

[99] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Diaz JA, Wrobleski SK, Hawley AE, Lucchesi BR, Wakefield TW, Myers DD Jr. Electrolytic inferior vena cava model (EIM) of venous thrombosis. J Vis Exp. 2011;53: 27–37.
View Article
Google Scholar

[101] View Article

[102] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Byun Y, Singh VK, Yang VC. Low molecular weight protamine: a potential nontoxic heparin antagonist. Thromb Res. 1999;94: 53–61. pmid:10213181
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[104] View Article

[105] PubMed/NCBI

[106] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Mogielnicki A, Chabielska E, Pawlak R, Szemraj J, Buczko W. Angiotensin II enhances thrombosis development in renovascular hypertensive rats. Thromb Haemost. 2005;93: 1069–1076. pmid:15968390
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] PubMed/NCBI

[110] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Bull BS, Hay KL, Herrmann PC. Postoperative bypass-associated dilutional (BAD) coagulopathy? Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2009;43: 256–259. pmid:19699663
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[112] View Article

[113] PubMed/NCBI

[114] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Cushing DJ, Cooper WD, Cohen ML, McVoy JRS, Sobel M, Harris RB. Reversal of heparin-induced increases in aPTT in the rat by PM102, a novel heparin antagonist. Eur J Pharmacol. 2010;635: 165–170. pmid:20307530
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[116] View Article

[117] PubMed/NCBI

[118] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Oney S, Lam RTS, Bompiani KM, Blake CM, Quick G, Heidel JD, et al. Development of universal antidotes to control aptamer activity. Nat Med. 2009;15: 1224–1228. pmid:19801990
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[120] View Article

[121] PubMed/NCBI

[122] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Wu HF, Lundblad RL, Church FC. Neutralization of heparin activity by neutrophil lactoferrin. Blood. 1995;85: 421–428. pmid:7811995
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[124] View Article

[125] PubMed/NCBI

[126] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Kikura M, Lee MK, Levy JH. Heparin neutralization with methylene blue, hexadimethrine, or vancomycin after cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth Analg. 1996;83: 223–227. pmid:8694296
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[128] View Article

[129] PubMed/NCBI

[130] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Fazavana J, Bianchini EP, Saller F, Smadja C, Picard V, Taverna M, et al. A chemically-modified inactive antithrombin as a potent antagonist of fondaparinux and heparin anticoagulant activity. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11: 1128–1136. pmid:23581397
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[132] View Article

[133] PubMed/NCBI

[134] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Johansson PI. Off-label use of recombinant factor VIIa for treatment of haemorrhage: results from randomized clinical trials. Vox Sang. 2008;95: 1–7. pmid:18460058
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[136] View Article

[137] PubMed/NCBI

[138] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Kelton JG, Smith JW, Warkentin TE, Hayward CP, Denomme GA, Horsewood P. Immunoglobulin G from patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia binds to a complex of heparin and platelet factor 4. Blood. 1994;83: 3232–3239. pmid:8193358
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[140] View Article

[141] PubMed/NCBI

[142] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Visentin GP, Ford SE, Scott JP, Aster RH. Antibodies from patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia/thrombosis are specific for platelet factor 4 complexed with heparin or bound to endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1994;93: 81–88. pmid:8282825
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[144] View Article

[145] PubMed/NCBI

[146] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Bakchoul T, Zöllner H, Amiral J, Panzer S, Selleng S, Kohlmann T, et al. Anti-protamine-heparin antibodies: Incidence, clinical relevance, and pathogenesis. Blood. 2013;121: 2821–2827. pmid:23325832
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[148] View Article

[149] PubMed/NCBI

[150] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Stafford-Smith M, Lefrak EA, Qazi AG, Welsby IJ, Barber L, Hoeft A, et al. Efficacy and safety of heparinase I versus protamine in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesthesiology. 2005;103: 229–240. pmid:16052104
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[152] View Article

[153] PubMed/NCBI

[154] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Lee LM, Chang LC, Wrobleski S, Wakefield TW, Yang VC. Low molecular weight protamine as nontoxic heparin/low molecular weight heparin antidote (III): Preliminary in vivo evaluation of efficacy and toxicity using a canine model. AAPS PharmSci. 2001;3: E19. pmid:11741270
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[156] View Article

[157] PubMed/NCBI

[158] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Liang JF, Zhen L, Chang LC, Yang VC. A less toxic heparin antagonist—low molecular weight protamine. Biochemistry (Moscow). 2003;68: 116–120. pmid:12693985
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[160] View Article

[161] PubMed/NCBI

[162] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Woodman RC, Harker LA. Bleeding complications associated with cardiopulmonary bypass. Blood. 1990;76: 1680–1697. pmid:2224118
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[164] View Article

[165] PubMed/NCBI

[166] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Singer RL, Mannion JD, Bauer TL, Armenti FR, Edie RN. Complications from heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Chest. 1993;104: 1436–1440. pmid:8222802
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[168] View Article

[169] PubMed/NCBI

[170] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Colman RW. Hemostatic complications of cardiopulmonary bypass. Am J Hematol. 1995;48: 267–272. pmid:7536391
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[172] View Article

[173] PubMed/NCBI

[174] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. McDonagh DL, Berger M, Mathew JP, Graffagnino C, Milano CA, Newman MF. Neurological complications of cardiac surgery. The Lancet Neurology. 2014;13: 490–502. pmid:24703207
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[176] View Article

[177] PubMed/NCBI

[178] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Shigeta O, Kojima H, Hiramatsu Y, Jikuya T, Terada Y, Atsumi N, et al. Low-dose protamine based on heparin-protamine titration method reduces platelet dysfunction after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;118: 354–360. pmid:10425010
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[180] View Article

[181] PubMed/NCBI

[182] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Anderson WF. Human gene therapy. Science. 1992;8: 808–13.
View Article
Google Scholar

[184] View Article

[185] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Karewicz A, Szczubialka K, Nowakowska M. Cationic polymers in drug delivery. In: Samal SK, Dubruel P, editors. Cationic polymers in regenerative medicine. Royal Society of Chemistry; 2015. pp. 296–320.

[ref50] 50. El-Aneed A. An overview of current delivery systems in cancer gene therapy. J Control Rel. 2004;94: 1–14.
View Article
Google Scholar

[188] View Article

[189] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Shi W, Ji Y, Zhang X, Shu S, Wu Z. Characterization of ph- and thermosensitive hydrogel as a vehicle for controlled protein delivery. J Pharm Sci. 2011;100: 886–895. pmid:20862775
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[191] View Article

[192] PubMed/NCBI

[193] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Bulwan M, Antosiak-Iwańska M, Godlewska E, Granicka L, Zapotoczny S, Nowakowska M. Chitosan-Based Nanocoatings for Hypothermic Storage of Living Cells. Macromol Biosci. 2013;13: 1610–1620. pmid:23966342
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[195] View Article

[196] PubMed/NCBI

[197] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Animals

Chemicals and drugs

Polymer synthesis and characteristics

Binding of UFH by the cationic polymers

Experimental arterial thrombosis in rats

Experimental venous thrombosis in mice

Bleeding time in rats

aPTT measurement in rats and mice

Anti-factor Xa activity in rats

Blood cell count in rats

Blood pressure measurement in rats

Immunization experiments

Immune response evaluation

Statistical analysis

Results

Characteristics of the synthesized polymers

In vitro UFH binding by the cationic polymers

Reversal of the effects of UFH on the arterial thrombosis in rats

Reversal of the effects of UFH on the venous thrombosis in mice

Influence of the cationic polymers on aPTT

Reversal of tail bleeding time by the cationic polymers

Reversal of plasma anti-Xa activity by the cationic polymers

Blood count

Effects of the cationic polymers on blood pressure in rats

Evaluation of the immune response to the cationic polymers

Discussion

Supporting Information

S1 File. Synthesis of polymers.

S2 File. Characteristics of the polymers.

S3 File. Mean blood pressure course in rats one hour after administration of the polymers and protamine.

Author Contributions

References