Skip to main content
Log in

Monoclonal Digoxin-Specific Antibodies Induce Dose-and Affinity-Dependent Plasma Digoxin Redistribution in Rats

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of three monoclonal digoxin-specific antibodies on total and free digoxin plasma disposition was studied in rats in order to determine the role of affinity constant (Ka) and dose. Thirty minutes after digoxin infusion, administration of a stoichiometrical dose of the 1CIO, 6C9 and 9F5 IgG (Ka = 6 109, 3.1 108 and 2.5 107 M−1, respectively) resulted in a plasma digoxin increase linearly related to Ka. The mean free plasma digoxin was 0.6 ± 0.4, 7.8 ± 3.3 and 43 ± 22 % respectively after 1C10, 6C9, and 9F5 IgG infusion in comparison to 70 ± 9% in the control group. When the IgG:digoxin ratio increased from 1 to 5, plasma digoxin Cmax and AUCT also increased as a function of both affinity (Ka) and dose (N), but not linearly. The product of NKa defined an immunoreactivity factor that was well fitted to the digoxin redistribution parameters (Cmax and AUCT) by a Hill equation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. T. Smith, E. Haber, L. Yeatman and V.P. Butler. Reversal of advanced digoxin intoxication with Fab fragments of digoxinspecific antibodies. N. Engl. J. Med. 294: 797–800 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A.R. Hickey, T.L. Wenger, V.P. Carpenter, H.H. Tilson, M.A. Hlatky, C.D. Furberg, C.H. Kirkpatrick, H.C. Strauss and T.W. Smith. Digoxin immune Fab therapy in the management of digitalis intoxication: safety and efficacy results of an observational surveillance study. J. Am. Coll. Cardio. 17: 590–598 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.F. Watson and V.P. Butler. Biological activity of digoxin-specific antisera. J. Clin. Invest. 51: 638–648 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  4. V.P. Butler, D.H. Schmidt, T.W. Smith, E. Haber, B.D. Raynor and P. Demartini. Effects of sheep digoxin-specific antibodies and their Fab fragments on digoxin pharmacokinetics in dogs. J. Clin. Invest. 59: 345–359 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  5. P.C. Johnston, I.H. Stevenson and D.S. Hewick. The influence of digoxin-specific antibody fragments on digoxin disposition in the rat. Biochem. Pharmacol. 36: 2215–2220 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Pentel, S.M. Pond and D. Schoof. Redistribution into plasma of tracer doses of desipramine by anti-desipramine antiserum in rats. Biochem. Pharmacol. 36: 293–295 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  7. S.M. Owens and M. Mayersohn. Phencyclidine-specific Fab fragments alter phencyclidine disposition in dogs. Drug Metab. Dispos. 14: 52–58 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Sabouraud, M. Urtizberea, N. Cano, M. Grandgeorge, J.M. Rouzioux and J.M. Scherrmann. Colchicine-specific Fab fragments alter colchicine disposition in rabbits. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 260: 1214–1219 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Pentel, D. Keyler, G. Brunn, J. Milavetz, D. Gilbertson, S. Matta and S. Pond. Redistribution of tricyclic antidepressants in rats using a drug-specific monoclonal antibody: dose-resposne relationship. Drug Metab. Dispos. 19: 24–28 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. Terrien, M. Urtizberea and J.M. Scherrmann. Reversal of advanced colchicine toxicity in mice with goat colchicine-specific antibodies. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 104: 504–510 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Wahyono, M. Piechaczyk, C. Mourton, J.M. Bastide and B. Pau. Novel anti-digoxin monoclonal antibodies with different binding specificities for digoxin metabolites and other glycosides. Hybridoma 9: 619–629 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. Cano, A. Sabouraud, M. Urtizberea, J. Carcagne, M. Grandgeorge and J.M. Scherrmann. Analytical control procedures of immunoreactivity for IgG and Fab fragments specific to haptens. Pharm. Res. 9(5): 643–647 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  13. D.H. Schmidt and V.P. Butler. Reversal of digoxin toxicity with specific antibodies. J. Clin. Invest. 50: 1738–1744 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  14. V.P. Butler, D.H. Schmidt, J.D. Gardner, J.F. Watson, W.J. Mandel and C.L. Skelton. Reversal of the pharmacological and toxic effects of cardiac glycosides by specific antibodies. Pharmacol. Rev. 25(2): 239–248 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  15. W.A. Colburn. Specific antibodies and Fab fragments to alter the pharmacokinetics and reverse the pharmacologic/toxicologic effects of drugs. Drug Met. Rev. 11: 223–262 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  16. M.P. Timsina and D.S. Hewich. The plasma disposition and renal elimination of digoxin-specific Fab fragments and digoxin in the rabbit. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 44:796–800 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  17. W. Schaumann, B. Kaufmann, P. Neubert and A. Smolarz. Kinetics of the Fab frangments of digoxin antibodies and of bound digoxin in patients with severe digoxin intoxication. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 30: 522–533 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Urtizberea, M. Latour, L. Edelman, J. Carcagne, J. Armand and J.M. Scherrmann. Immunopharmacological activity of monoclonal anti-digitoxin. Devel. Biol. Standard. 71: 147–157 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Lechat, M. Mugdett-Hunter, M.N. Margolies, E.D. Haber and T.W. Smith. Reversal of lethal digoxin toxicity in guinea pigs using monoclonal antibodies and Fab fragments. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 229: 210–213 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.M. Scherrmann, N. Terrien, M. Urtizberea, P. Pierson, H. Denis and J.M. Bourre. Immunotoxicotherapy: present status and future trends. J. Tox. Clin. Tox 27(1–2): 1–35 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. Albin, G. Vincon, D. Ploux and J. Dangoumau. Influence de la temperature sur la cinétique du propranolol, de la theophylline, de la phenytoine et de la digoxine chez le rat. J. Pharmacol. 12(3): 229–238 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  22. F. Noel and T. Godfraind. Heterogeneity of ouabain specific binding sites and (Na+K+)-ATPase inhibition in microsomes from rat heart. Biochem. Pharmacol. 33: 47–53 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  23. S.M. Pond, P.R. Pentel, D.E. Keyler and D.J. Winzor. Determination of the in vivo antigen-antibody affinity constant from the redistribution of desipramine in rats following administration of a desipramine specific monoclonal antibody. Biochem. Pharmacol. 41: 473–476 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  24. E.E. Ohnhaus, P. Spring and L. Dettli. Protein binding of digoxin in human serum. Europ. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 5: 34–36 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  25. P. Pentel and D. Keyler. Effects of high dose alpha-1-glycoprotein on desipramine toxicity in rats. J. Clin. Exp. Ther. 246: 1061–1066 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  26. D.E. Keyler and P.E. Pentel. Effects of alpha-1-acide glycoprotein administration on propranolol binding and beta blockade in rats. Biochem. Pharmacol. 38: 1163–1168 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  27. B. Oosterhuis and C.J. van Boxtel. Kinetics of drug effects in man. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. 10: 121–132 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cano, N.J., Sabouraud, A.E., Benmoussa, K. et al. Monoclonal Digoxin-Specific Antibodies Induce Dose-and Affinity-Dependent Plasma Digoxin Redistribution in Rats. Pharm Res 12, 709–714 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016211626095

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016211626095

Navigation