Elsevier

Neuroscience

Volume 131, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 263-273
Neuroscience

Behavioral sensitization to ethanol is modulated by environmental conditions, but is not associated with cross-sensitization to allopregnanolone or pentobarbital in DBA/2J mice

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.11.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Rationale: The ability of ethanol to facilitate GABAA receptor-mediated transmission may result in GABAA receptor alterations during repeated ethanol administration, and lead to dynamic behavioral changes, including sensitization to the locomotor stimulant effect of ethanol. Since alterations in GABAA receptors are likely to alter sensitivity to GABAergic drugs such as 3α-hydroxy-5α-pregnan-20-one (allopregnanolone) and pentobarbital, we determined whether enhanced sensitivity to ethanol was associated with enhanced sensitivity (cross-sensitization) to these drugs. Two procedures that produced differences in the magnitude of expression of ethanol-induced locomotor sensitization were used.

Methods

After habituation to testing procedures for 2 days, female DBA/2J mice were injected with ethanol or saline for 12 days. On the following day, locomotion was recorded after a challenge injection of ethanol (2 g/kg), allopregnanolone (10 or 17 mg/kg), or pentobarbital (10 or 20 mg/kg). Due to evidence that exposure to the test chambers influenced sensitization, in some experiments, mice were exposed to the test apparatus on the day prior to challenge.

Results

Exposure to the test apparatus prior to drug challenge attenuated the expression of ethanol sensitization, compared with mice without this pre-exposure. Cross-sensitization was not observed to either allopregnanolone or pentobarbital under any condition; however, some groups of repeated ethanol-treated mice displayed tolerance to the initial stimulant effects of allopregnanolone and pentobarbital.

Conclusions

These studies indicate that behavioral sensitization to ethanol is not associated with cross-sensitization to pentobarbital or allopregnanolone, and that the expression of ethanol sensitization is influenced by the relative novelty of the test chamber. In addition, these results do not support a mechanism in which alterations in the neurosteroid or barbiturate modulatory sites of the GABAA receptor are responsible for the expression of sensitization to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol.

Section snippets

Subjects and housing

Female DBA/2J mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA), and allowed to adapt to the Veterans Affairs Medical Center animal research facility for at least 1 week prior to the initiation of testing. This strain of mice was chosen for its susceptibility to ethanol-induced behavioral sensitization (Phillips et al., 1995). Females were chosen for consistency with our previous work (Phillips et al., 1992, 1995), and because others have found that female rodents displayed

Experiment 1

There were differences in locomotor activity across days 1 through 14 for the repeated ethanol- and saline-treated mice [Fig. 1A; F(3,132)=98.4; P<0.01, for the Repeated Treatment×Day interaction]. Simple main effects analyses followed by planned comparisons revealed that the ethanol-treated mice expressed significant behavioral sensitization on day 14 (P<0.01), compared with day 3. There was no change in the response to saline on day 14 compared with day 3 in the saline-treated mice. As can be

Discussion

The present results demonstrate robust behavioral sensitization to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol, as has previously been reported for DBA/2J mice (Broadbent and Harless, 1999; Cunningham and Noble, 1992; Lessov et al., 2001a,b; Phillips et al., 1994; Roberts et al., 1995). Further, the results show a lack of cross-sensitization between ethanol and either allopregnanolone or pentobarbital, both of which are thought to produce their effects via interactions with specific modulatory

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NIAAA grants P50AA10760, T32AA07468 and F32AA05600, as well as a grant from the Department of Veterans Affairs. All of these procedures comply with the current laws of the United States of America and were performed in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and National Institutes of Health guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals.

References (84)

  • B.C. Dudek et al.

    Genetic influences on locomotor activating effects of ethanol and sodium pentobarbital

    Pharmacol Biochem Behav

    (1994)
  • D.A. Finn et al.

    Sex differences in the effect of ethanol injection and consumption on brain allopregnanolone levels in C57BL/6 mice

    Neuroscience

    (2004)
  • S. Fraioli et al.

    Susceptibility to amphetamine-induced locomotor sensitization is modulated by environmental stimuli

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (1999)
  • A.C. Grobin et al.

    Age-related differences in neurosteroid potentiation of muscimol-stimulated 36Cl(−) flux following chronic ethanol treatment

    Neuroscience

    (2001)
  • K. Hirani et al.

    Behavioral action of ethanol in Porsolt’s forced swim testmodulation by 3 alpha-hydroxy-5 alpha-pregnan-20-one

    Neuropharmacology

    (2002)
  • B.A. Hoshaw et al.

    Behavioral sensitization to ethanol in ratsevidence from the Sprague-Dawley strain

    Pharmacol Biochem Behav

    (2001)
  • Y. Itzhak et al.

    Effects of cocaine, nicotine, dizocilpine and alcohol on mice locomotor activitycocaine-alcohol cross-sensitization involves upregulation of striatal dopamine transporter binding sites

    Brain Res

    (1999)
  • J.M. Khanna et al.

    Effect of lipid solubility on the development of chronic cross-tolerance between ethanol and different alcohols and barbiturates

    Pharmacol Biochem Behav

    (1997)
  • G.F. Koob et al.

    Drug addiction, dysregulation of reward, and allostasis

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2001)
  • E.R. Korpi et al.

    Increased behavioral neurosteroid sensitivity in a rat line selectively bred for high alcohol sensitivity

    Eur J Pharmacol

    (2001)
  • S. Kumar et al.

    Ethanol regulation of gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptorsgenomic and nongenomic mechanisms

    Pharmacol Ther

    (2004)
  • R.G. Lister

    The effects of ethanol on exploration in DBA/2 and C57Bl/6 mice

    Alcohol

    (1987)
  • J. Masur et al.

    The excitatory component of ethanol in micea chronic study

    Pharmacol Biochem Behav

    (1980)
  • L.E. O’Dell et al.

    Ethanol-induced increases in neuroactive steroids in the rat brain and plasma are absent in adrenalectomized and gonadectomized rats

    Eur J Pharmacol

    (2004)
  • T.E. Robinson et al.

    The neural basis of drug cravingan incentive-sensitization theory of addiction

    Brain Res Rev

    (1993)
  • L.G. Schmidt et al.

    Transition to alcohol dependenceclinical and neurobiological considerations

    Compr Psychiatry

    (2000)
  • S. Ueno et al.

    Sites of positive allosteric modulation by neurosteroids on ionotropic gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunits

    FEBS Lett

    (2004)
  • R.A. Wise et al.

    Influence of novel and habituated testing conditions on cocaine sensitization

    Eur J Pharmacol

    (1996)
  • A. Badiani et al.

    Modulation of morphine sensitization in the rat by contextual stimuli

    Psychopharmacology

    (2000)
  • J.B. Becker et al.

    Gender differences in the behavioral responses to cocaine and amphetamineimplications for mechanisms mediating gender differences in drug abuse

    Ann NY Acad Sci

    (2001)
  • J. Broadbent et al.

    Differential effects of GABA(A) and GABA(B) agonists on sensitization to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol in DBA/2 J mice

    Psychopharmacology

    (1999)
  • J. Broadbent et al.

    Dizocilpine (MK-801) prevents the development of sensitization to ethanol in DBA/2J mice

    Alcohol Alcohol

    (1999)
  • J. Broadbent et al.

    Haloperidol prevents ethanol-stimulated locomotor activity but fails to block sensitization

    Psychopharmacology

    (1995)
  • J. Broadbent et al.

    Expression of behavioral sensitization to ethanol by DBA/2J micethe role of NMDA and non-NMDA glutamate receptors

    Psychopharmacology

    (2003)
  • K.J. Buck et al.

    Benzodiazepine agonist and inverse agonist actions on GABAA receptor-operated chloride channels: I. Acute effects of ethanol

    J Pharmacol Exp Ther

    (1990)
  • K.J. Buck et al.

    Benzodiazepine agonist and inverse agonist actions on GABAA receptor-operated chloride channels: II. Chronic effects of ethanol

    J Pharmacol Exp Ther

    (1990)
  • R. Camarini et al.

    MK-801 blocks the development of behavioral sensitization to the ethanol

    Alcohol Clin Exp Res

    (2000)
  • R. Camarini et al.

    Involvement of the opioid system in the development and expression of sensitization to the locomotor-activating effect of ethanol

    Int J Neuropsychopharmacol

    (2000)
  • J.A. Chester et al.

    Effects of acamprosate on sensitization to the locomotor-stimulant effects of alcohol in mice selectively bred for high and low alcohol preference

    Behav Pharmacol

    (2001)
  • J.L. Cornish et al.

    Cocaine sensitization and cravingdiffering roles for dopamine and glutamate in the nucleus accumbens

    J Addict Dis

    (2001)
  • M. Correa et al.

    Locomotor stimulant effects of intraventricular injections of low doses of ethanol in ratsacute and repeated administration

    Psychopharmacology

    (2003)
  • J.C. Crabbe et al.

    Genetic determinants of sensitivity to pentobarbital in inbred mice

    Psychopharmacology

    (2002)
  • Cited by (21)

    • Transition from ethanol-induced sensitization to tolerance across early and late infancy in the rat

      2016, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      For instance, the way in which subjects from each age group respond to novelty seems to be involved in the ontogenetic transition from ethanol-induced sensitization to tolerance during infancy. Both the acute stimulation and the sensitized locomotor response induced by ethanol are highly dependent on novelty (Arias et al., 2009a; Didone et al., 2015; Hoshaw and Lewis, 2001; Meyer et al., 2005). Although we did not manipulate novelty in our study, other authors have reported that on PD 15 of the rat there is a peak in the locomotor response to a novel open-field (Campbell and Raskin, 1978), precisely the day on which we tested our subjects trained during the 2nd week, which could influence the expression of sensitization.

    • Effects of nicotine on ethanol-induced locomotor sensitization: A model of neuroadaptation

      2015, Behavioural Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Each monitor was enclosed in an Environmental Control Chamber constructed from PVC/lexan (AccuScan Instruments, Inc.) and each chamber was equipped with a fan that provided ventilation and background noise, and was illuminated by a 3.3 Watt incandescent light bulb that was on during testing. The effect of nicotine on ethanol-induced locomotor sensitization was examined using an established procedure for producing ethanol-induced sensitization in DBA/2J mice [24–26,29] across a 13-day period (see Table 1 for treatment schedule and dose groups). Days 1 and 2 were used to assess baseline locomotor activity.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Present address: Columbia Genome Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

    View full text