Levo-tetrahydropalmatine inhibits cocaine's rewarding effects: Experiments with self-administration and brain-stimulation reward in rats
Introduction
Cocaine addiction is a persistent social and health problem worldwide, with no effective medications currently available for treatment. In light of the important role of the mesolimbic dopamine (DA) system in drug abuse (Wise, 1996, Wise, 2005), much attention has focused on various DA receptor antagonists as potential treatments (Rothman and Glowa, 1995, Platt et al., 2002). However, clinical trials with D1 or D2 receptor antagonists for cocaine addiction have failed due to ineffectiveness, surmountability by increased drug intake, and/or unfavorable side effects such as dysphoria, extrapyramidal movements or inhibition of natural reward (Sherer et al., 1989, Nann-Vernotica et al., 2001, Haney et al., 2001, Newton et al., 2001; see reviews by Platt et al., 2002, Gorelick et al., 2004).
Alternatively, a number of research groups have investigated novel compounds that target other DA receptors, such as D3 receptors (Heidbreder et al., 2005, Xi and Gardner, 2007) or drug cocktails that target multiple DA receptors. The rationale for the development of D3 receptor antagonists is largely based on the highly restricted distribution of D3 receptors in brain reward circuits (Sokoloff et al., 2006), suggesting that D3 receptor antagonists may have anti-cocaine actions but without significant side effects. The drug cocktail medications are based on the presumption that multiple DA receptor blockade may produce additive or synergistic therapeutic effects, but have fewer unwanted side effects due to lower doses of each component in the cocktails (Soyka and De Vry, 2000, Platt et al., 2002, Gorelick et al., 2004).
Levo-tetrahydropalmatine (l-THP) is a purified active ingredient from the Chinese herb Stephanie (Jin, 1987, Jin et al., 2002). l-THP, as a traditional sedative-analgesic agent, has been used for more than 40 years in China for the treatment of chronic pain and anxious insomnia (Jin, 1987, Jin et al., 2002). Recent studies have demonstrated that l-THP is a non-selective D1 and D2 (and possibly D3) receptor antagonist (Xu et al., 1989, Guo et al., 1997, Mantsch et al., 2007). In addition, it also has high binding affinity for α1- and α2-adrenergic receptors and several serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) receptors (5-HT1A, 5-HT4 and 5-HT7) (Mantsch et al., 2007; Shijiang Li at the Medical College of Wisconsin, unpublished data). Given that cocaine is also a non-selective monoamine (DA, norepinephrine and 5-HT) reuptake inhibitor (Wise, 2005), the similar binding properties of l-THP for monoamine receptors suggest that l-THP may act as a natural cocktail-like cocaine antagonist. Recent studies have shown that l-THP significantly inhibits cocaine- or methamphetamine-induced conditioned place preference (Ren et al., 2000, Luo et al., 2003), cocaine self-administration under fixed-ratio (FR) reinforcement and cocaine-triggered reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior in rats (Mantsch et al., 2007). In addition, l-THP also inhibits opiate tolerance and withdrawal syndromes in rats (Jin et al., 1998, Ge et al., 1999), as well as locomotor sensitization to oxycodone, an opioid receptor agonist, in mice (Liu et al., 2005). Further, it was recently reported that l-THP significantly attenuates opiate craving and relapse in heroin addicts (Yang et al., 2006). However, it remains unclear whether l-THP inhibits the acute rewarding effects of cocaine, or whether such an inhibition is due to a direct action on brain reward function or to non-specific sedation and locomotor inhibition. Therefore, in the present study, we investigated: (1) whether l-THP inhibits cocaine self-administration under both FR and progressive-ratio (PR) reinforcement, and cocaine-enhanced brain stimulation reward (BSR)—both PR self-administration and BSR are thought to be sensitive and reliable paradigms to evaluate a drug's rewarding effects (Gardner, 2000, Wise, 2005); (2) whether the same doses of l-THP inhibit locomotion or sucrose self-administration; (3) whether l-THP itself has rewarding or aversive effects in the BSR paradigm; and finally, (4) whether a presynaptic or postsynaptic DA receptor mechanism underlies l-THP's potential therapeutic actions by measuring brain DA responses to cocaine in the presence or absence of l-THP using in vivo brain microdialysis.
Section snippets
Animals
Experimentally naïve male Long–Evans rats (Charles River Laboratories, Raleigh, NC, USA) weighing 250–300 g were used for all experiments. They were housed individually in a climate-controlled animal colony room on a reversed light/dark cycle (lights on at 19:00, lights off at 07:00 h) with free access to food and water. The animals were maintained in a facility fully accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International (AAALAC International). All
Effects of l-THP on fixed-ratio (FR) cocaine self-administration
To determine whether l-THP altered the rewarding effects of cocaine, we first observed the dose effects of l-THP on cocaine self-administration under FR2 reinforcement. Fig. 1A shows representative cocaine self-administration patterns before and after l-THP administration, illustrating that 3 or 10 mg/kg l-THP significantly increased cocaine self-administration rates, while 20 mg/kg l-THP produced an initial virtually total inhibition (for about 90 min) and a subsequent burst-like increase in
Discussion
The present study demonstrates that systemic administration of l-THP (1, 3, 10 mg/kg) dose-dependently increased, while 20 mg/kg decreased the rate of cocaine self-administration under FR reinforcement. The increase in cocaine self-administration produced by the lower l-THP doses is most likely a compensatory response to a reduction in cocaine's rewarding effects, because the same doses of l-THP dose-dependently inhibited cocaine self-administration under PR reinforcement and also inhibited
Acknowledgements
Disclosure/Conflict of interest.
All authors hereby declare that, except for income received from their respective primary employers, no financial support or compensation has been received from any individual or corporate entity over the past three years for research or professional services. There are no personal financial holdings that could be perceived as constituting a potential conflict of interest.
This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on
References (45)
- et al.
A critique of fixed ratio and progressive ratio schedules used to examine the neural substrates of drug reinforcement
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.
(1997) - et al.
The effects of food deprivation on the self-administration of psychoactive drugs
Drug Alcohol Depend.
(1987) - et al.
The role of central dopamine D3 receptors in drug addiction: a review of pharmacological evidence
Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev.
(2005) (−)-Tetrahydropalmatine and its analogues as new dopamine receptor antagonists
Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
(1987)- et al.
(−)-Stepholidine: a potential novel antipsychotic drug with dual D1 receptor agonist and D2 receptor antagonist actions
Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
(2002) - et al.
Effects of D1 and D2 dopamine receptor antagonists on cocaine-induced self-stimulation and locomotor activity in rats
Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol.
(1999) - et al.
Neurochemical changes in cocaine withdrawal
Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
(1996) - et al.
Risperidone pre-treatment reduces the euphoric effects of experimentally administered cocaine
Psychiatry Res.
(2001) - et al.
The effects of systemic and intracerebral injections of D1 and D2 agonists on brain stimulation reward
Brain Res.
(1994) - et al.
Effects of intravenous cocaine are partially attenuated by haloperidol
Psychiatry Res.
(1989)
Flupenthixol as a potential pharmacotreatment of alcohol and cocaine abuse/dependence
Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol.
The effects of a D1 and a D2 dopamine antagonist on behavior maintained by cocaine or food
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.
Synergistic effects of cocaine with lateral hypothalamic brain stimulation reward: lack of tolerance or sensitization
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
Antagonism of cocaine self-administration by selective dopamine D1 and D2 antagonists
Behav. Pharmacol.
Effects of dopamine D-1 and D-2 antagonists on cocaine self-administration under different schedules of reinforcement in the rat
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
Patterns of gene expression and behavior induced by chronic dopamine treatments
Ann. Neurol.
Effects of food deprivation on cocaine base smoking in rhesus monkeys
Psychopharmacology
Fitting intracranial self-stimulation data with growth models
Behav. Neurosci.
Effects of (−)stepholidine in animal models for schizophrenia
Acta Pharmacol. Sin.
The neurobiology and genetics of addiction: implications of “reward deficiency syndrome” for therapeutic strategies in chemical dependency
What we have learned about addiction from animal models of drug self-administration
Am. J. Addict.
Experimental studies with tetrahydropalmatine analogs in relieving morphine withdrawal syndromes
Chinese J. Drug Depend.
Cited by (43)
Tetrahydroprotoberberines: A Novel Source of Pharmacotherapies for Substance Use Disorders?
2020, Trends in Pharmacological Sciences(-)-Stepholidine reduces cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking and cocaine self-administration in rats
2018, Drug and Alcohol DependenceDopamine D1 and D3 receptor polypharmacology as a potential treatment approach for substance use disorder
2018, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsCitation Excerpt :In self-administration studies, low to moderate doses (1, 3 and 10 mg/kg) of l-THP increased, but a high dose (20 mg/kg), decreased FR2 responding for cocaine (Xi et al., 2007). L-THP also reduced BPs in responding for cocaine under a PR schedule of reinforcement (Mantsch et al., 2010; Xi et al., 2007) and, in a multiple schedule of reinforcement with alternating 30-min FR4 cocaine and 15-min FR4 food reinforcement, produced a rightward and downward shift in the dose-response curve for cocaine self-administration at doses that failed to alter responding for food (Mantsch et al., 2007). In addition, l-THP reduces oxycodone (Liu et al., 2009), cocaine and methamphetamine CPP (Su et al., 2013).