Multiple opiate receptors: déjà vu all over again
Introduction
The opiate field has a unique position in pharmacology and neuroscience. The opioid receptors were among the first neurotransmitter receptors to be identified and characterized in binding assays (Pert and Snyder, 1973, Simon et al., 1973, Terenius, 1973) and were one of the first to use a receptor to identify its endogenous ligand, the endogenous opioid peptides (Table 1) (Hughes et al., 1975, Hughes, 1975, Terenius and Wahlstrom, 1975, Pasternak et al., 1975a). Our understanding of these receptors and their endogenous ligands has mirrored the advancements of neuroscience, evolving from simple receptor binding assays, which were state of the art 30 years ago, to the cloning of these receptors and understanding them at the most basic molecular levels today.
From the beginning, our group has attempted to use the vast clinical experience with these agents to provide the direction for our laboratory work. Our focus over the years has been with the receptors, particularly the concept of multiple opioid receptors. The initial suggestion of multiple opioid receptors was based upon observations made with morphine and nalorphine combinations in patients (Lasagna and Beecher, 1954, Houde and Wallenstein, 1956). Nalorphine, in which the N-methyl group is substituted by an N-allyl group, was one of the earliest opioid antagonists. Its ability to reverse morphine actions was clearly demonstrated in clinical trials. However, as the relative dose of nalorphine to morphine was increased further, analgesia returned, illustrating a complexity in its pharmacology that had not been appreciated previously. Thus, nalorphine was a mixed agonist/antagonist capable of both reversing morphine analgesia and inducing analgesia itself at higher doses. These studies, which were performed almost half a century ago, led Bill Martin to suggest the existence of more than one opiate receptor, a concept he termed receptor dualism (Martin, 1967). In it, he proposed M and N receptors, corresponding to morphine and nalorphine receptors. Morphine was an agonist at the M receptor while nalorphine acted as an antagonist at the M receptor and an agonist at the N receptor.
Martin further refined his concept of multiple opioid receptors based upon the actions of series of drugs in the dog (Martin et al., 1976). In these studies, Martin again proposed a receptor for morphine, which he termed mu, as well as a receptor for the benzomorphan ketocyclazocine, which he termed kappa. He also suggested the existence of a third receptor, sigma. However, the concept of sigma receptors has evolved over the years (Pasternak et al., 1981, Wolozin et al., 1982, Walker et al., 1990). Although sigma1 receptors modulate opioid actions (Chien and Pasternak, 1994, Pasternak, 1994, Chien and Pasternak, 1995a, Chien and Pasternak, 1995b), they are no longer considered opioid receptors. Indeed, cloning studies of the sigma1 receptor from several species (Pan et al., 1998, Mei and Pasternak, 2001, Hanner et al., 1996, Kekuda et al., 1996, Seth et al., 1997) indicate a relatively small protein of approximately 25 kDa with two predicted transmembrane domains. Thus, the initial concept for multiple opioid receptors evolved from clinical trials with morphine/nalorphine combinations and classical pharmacological approaches. Their biochemical identification came afterwards.
Section snippets
Opioid binding sites
In 1973, opioid receptors were first demonstrated within the central nervous system using a rapid filtration binding assay (Pert and Snyder, 1973, Simon et al., 1973, Terenius, 1973). These early studies defined a saturable binding site which bound opioids with an unexpectedly high affinity in the nanomolar range. The sites were examined in extensive detail and were the first in which the binding of agonists and antagonists could be distinguished by sodium ions (Pert et al., 1973), divalent
Multiple mu receptors: clinical observations
We formally proposed the concept of multiple mu receptors over 20 years ago (Wolozin and Pasternak, 1981). Despite the fact that most of the opioids used clinically are mu-selective, as defined by their selectivity in receptor binding assays, clinicians have long observed differences among these drugs, requiring the individualization of therapy (Payne and Pasternak, 1992). Patients may respond far better to one mu opioid than another, both with respect to analgesic responsiveness and
Multiple mu receptors: molecular pharmacology
The first biochemical evidence suggesting multiple mu receptors came from binding studies almost 30 years ago (Pasternak and Snyder, 1975a). In these binding studies, we observed a novel, very high affinity site using radiolabeled agonists and antagonists. We subsequently termed this site mu1, as opposed to the mu-selective site we termed mu2 (Wolozin and Pasternak, 1981). Our major focus always has been the correlation of binding sites with function. The synthesis of several antagonists
Multiple mu receptors: molecular biology
The opioid receptors were first cloned in 1992, starting with the delta opioid receptor DOR-1 (Evans et al., 1992, Kieffer et al., 1992) and followed shortly afterwards by the mu MOR-1 and kappa KOR-1 receptors (Uhl et al., 1994, Chen et al., 1993a, Eppler et al., 1993, Thompson et al., 1993, Wang et al., 1993, Chen et al., 1993b, Li et al., 1993, Meng et al., 1993). They all have an extracellular N-terminus and intracellular C-terminus, with seven membrane-spanning domains that comprise the
Characterization of the MOR-1 splice variants
A common splicing pattern among the species involves the C-terminus and is well illustrated in the mouse (Fig. 6). All these variants contain exons 1, 2 and 3, which comprise all seven transmembrane domains that form the binding pocket. Thus, it is not surprising that all the variants retain high affinity and selectivity for mu opioids in receptor binding assays (Table 3). However, they differ structurally at the C-terminus, a region important in transduction of the signal following receptor
Conclusion
Early clinical studies provided the initial suggestion of discrete mu and kappa opioid receptors. The extensive clinical experience with a wide range of mu opioids raised the question of mu receptor heterogeneity. Preclinical behavioral studies supported these clinical observations and binding approaches also inferred multiple mu receptors. The recent cloning of a host of MOR-1 splice variants in mice, rats and humans underscores the complexity of the systems. Indeed, there are far more
Acknowledgements
This work has been supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse through research grants (DA02615, DA06241 and DA07242) and a Senior Scientist Award (DA00220).
References (122)
- et al.
Comparative immunohistochemical distributions of carboxy terminus epitopes from the mu opioid receptor splice variants MOR-1D, MOR-1 and MOR-1C in the mouse and rat central nervous systems
Neuroscience
(2000) - et al.
Presynaptic localization of the carboxy-terminus epitopes of the mu opioid receptor splice variants MOR-1C and MOR-1D in the superficial laminae of the rat spinal cord
Neuroscience
(2001) - et al.
Expression of two variants of the human μ opioid receptor mRNA in SK-N-SH cells and human brain
FEBS Lett
(1994) - et al.
3-Methoxynaltrexone, a selective heroin/morphine-6β-glucuronide antagonist
FEBS Lett
(1997) - et al.
Methadone analgesia in morphine-insensitive CXBK mice
Eur. J. Pharmacol
(1998) - et al.
(−)-Pentazocine analgesia in mice: interactions with a σ receptor system
Eur. J. Pharmacol
(1995) - et al.
Sigma antagonists potentiate opioid analgesia in rats
Neurosci. Lett
(1995) - et al.
Discrimination by temperature of opiate agonist and antagonist receptor binding
Life Sci
(1975) - et al.
Purification and partial amino acid sequence of a μ opioid receptor from rat brain
J. Biol. Chem
(1993) - et al.
Oligomerization of mu- and delta-opioid receptors, generation of novel functional properties
J. Biol. Chem
(2000)
A peptide derived from a beta2-adrenergic receptor transmembrane domain inhibits both receptor dimerization and activation
J. Biol. Chem
Isolation of an endogenous compound from the brain with pharmacological properties similar to morphine
Brain Res
Cloning and functional expression of the human type 1 sigma receptor (hSigmaR1)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun
Comparison of binding of [3H]-methionine-enkephalin, [3H]-naltrexone and [3H]-dihydromorphine in the mouse vas deferens and the myenteric plexus and brain of the guinea pig
Eur. J. Pharmacol
Spinal and supraspinal opioid analgesia in the mouse: the role of subpopulations of opioid binding sites
Brain Res
Naloxonazine actions in vivo
Eur. J. Pharmacol
μ Opioid receptor knockout in mice: effects on ligand-induced analgesia and morphine lethality
Mol. Brain Res
Irreversible opiate agonists and antagonists: V. Hydrazone and acylhydrazone derivatives of naltrexone
Life Sci
Molecular cloning and pharmacological characterization of the rat sigma1 receptor
Biochem. Pharmacol
Isolation and expression of a novel alternatively spliced mu opioid receptor isoform, MOR-1F
FEBS Lett
Identification and characterization of two new human mu opioid receptor splice variants, hMOR-1O and hMOR-1X
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun
Anti-opioid activity of sigma1 systems
Regulatory Peptides
Incomplete cross tolerance and multiple mu opioid peptide receptors
Trends Pharmacol. Sci
Insights into mu opioid pharmacology—the role of mu opioid receptor subtypes
Life Sci
Antisense mapping: assessing the functional significance of genes and splice variants
Meth. Enzymol
Mapping of opioid receptors using antisense oligodeoxynucleotides: correlating their molecular biology and pharmacology
Trends Pharmacol. Sci
An endogenous morphine like factor in mammalian brain
Life Sci
Morphine-6-glucuronide, a potent mu agonist
Life Sci
Differential blockade by naloxonazine of two μ opiate actions: analgesia and inhibition of gastrointestinal transit
Eur. J. Pharmacol
Different μ receptor subtypes mediate spinal and supraspinal analgesia in mice
Eur. J. Pharmacol
Genetic influences in opioid analgesic sensitivity in mice
Brain Res
Strain differences in opiate receptors in mouse brain
Eur. J. Pharmacol
Antisense mapping the MOR-1 opioid receptor: evidence for alternative splicing and a novel morphine-6β-glucuronide receptor
FEBS Lett
Differential blockade of morphine and morphine-6β-glucuronide analgesia by antisense oligodeoxynucleotides directed against MOR-1 and G-protein α subunits in rats
Neurosci. Lett
Novel receptor mechanisms for heroin and morphine-6β-glucuronide analgesia
Neurosci. Lett
Cloning and structural analysis of the cDNA and the gene encoding the murine type 1 sigma receptor
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun
Immunohistochemical localization of the carboxy terminus of the novel mu opioid receptor splice variant MOR-1C within the human spinal cord
Neuroreport
Differential distribution in rat brain of mu opioid receptor carboxy terminal splice variants MOR-1C and MOR-1-like immunoreactivity: evidence for region-specific processing
J. Comp. Neurol
Opiate receptors in mice: genetic differences
Life Sci
Functional analysis of MOR-1 splice variants of the mu opioid receptor gene, Oprm
Synapse
Multiple opiate receptors: different regional distribution in the brain and differential binding of opiates and opioid peptides
Mol. Pharmacol
Molecular cloning and functional expression of a μ-opioid receptor from rat brain
Mol. Pharmacol
Molecular cloning of a rat kappa opioid receptor reveals sequence similarities to the μ and δ opioid receptors
Biochem. J
Strategies to manage the adverse effects of oral morphine: an evidence-based report
J. Clin. Oncol
Selective antagonism of opioid analgesia by a sigma system
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther
Kappa opiate receptor multiplicity: evidence for two U50, 488-sensitive kappa1 subtypes and a novel kappa3 subtype
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther
A splice variant of the mu opioid receptor is present in human SHSY-5Y cells
Soc. Neurosci
The opioid peptides
Cloning of a delta opioid receptor by functional expression
Science
The pharmacogenetics of analgesia: toward a genetically-based approach to pain management
Pharmacogenomics
Cited by (164)
Targeting opioid dysregulation in depression for the development of novel therapeutics
2019, Pharmacology and TherapeuticsMembers of the same pharmacological family are not alike: Different opioids, different consequences, hope for the opioid crisis?
2019, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological PsychiatryCitation Excerpt :That is to say, a particular agonist with a higher κ:μ affinity ratio would show increased KOR-specific signaling patterns globally, as compared to an agonist with a lower κ:μ affinity ratio. When one also considers ligand-specific differences in affinity for opioid receptor subtype splice variants (Pasternak, 2004), region-specific differences in splice variant expression patterns (Abbadie et al., 2000a; Abbadie et al., 2000b; Abbadie et al., 2000c), and the possibility of differential non-canonical pathway activation across splice variants (q.v. Section 3.4.2), a truly enormous degree of nuance in biological response to various opioid agonists appears possible, influenced by individual genetics/epigenetics, tissue type, brain region, time, and prior drug exposure. It is important to note that receptor-mediated signaling and ligand biases are cell-specific.
Bifunctional opioid receptor ligands as novel analgesics
2019, NeuropharmacologySynthesis and Investigation of Mixed μ-Opioid and δ-Opioid Agonists as Possible Bivalent Ligands for Treatment of Pain
2017, Journal of Heterocyclic ChemistryStress and Opioid Systems
2017, Hormones, Brain and Behavior: Third Edition