Elsevier

Neuropharmacology

Volume 46, Issue 5, April 2004, Pages 709-715
Neuropharmacology

Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol antagonizes endocannabinoid modulation of synaptic transmission between hippocampal neurons in culture

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2003.11.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Cannabinoids inhibit excitatory synaptic transmission between hippocampal neurons in culture. Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the principal psychoactive component in marijuana, acts as a partial agonist at these synapses. Thus, THC inhibited but did not block synaptic transmission when applied alone and, when applied in combination with WIN552212-2, it partially reversed the effects of this full agonist. Here, we address the question of how THC might interact with endocannabinoid signaling. Reducing the extracellular Mg2+ concentration to 0.1 mM elicited a repetitive pattern of glutamatergic synaptic activity that produced intracellular Ca2+ concentration spikes that were measured by indo-1-based microfluorimetry. The endocannabinoid, 2-arachidonyl glycerol (2-AG) produced a concentration-dependent and complete inhibition of spike frequency with an EC50 of 63±13 nM. 2-AG (1 μM) inhibition of spiking was blocked by SR141716A (1 μM). THC (100 nM) antagonized the actions of 2-AG producing a parallel shift in the concentration–response relationship for 2-AG (EC50 of 1430±254 nM). The attenuation of 2-AG (1 μM) inhibition of synaptic activity by THC was concentration-dependent with an IC50 of 42±9 nM. These results demonstrate that THC can antagonize endocannabinoid signaling. Thus, the effects of THC on synaptic transmission are predicted to depend on the level of endocannabinoid tone.

Introduction

Cannabis sativa has been used recreationally and therapeutically for thousands of years (Mechoulam and Hanus, 2000). Marijuana is the most commonly used illicit drug in the United States (Abood and Martin, 1992). Medicinal applications for Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the principal psychoactive ingredient in marijuana, focus on its analgesic, antispasmodic, appetite stimulant, and antiemetic properties (Pertwee, 2000). THC exerts its effects by interacting with receptors that are part of an endogenous cannabinoid signaling system (Piomelli et al., 1998).

Cannabinoids act on G-protein-coupled receptors primarily located in the brain (CB1) and the immune system (CB2) (Howlett, 1998). These receptors couple via inhibitory G-proteins to activate K+ channels and members of the MAP kinase family and to inhibit adenylyl cyclase and voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (Porter and Felder, 2001). Several endogenous ligands for these receptors have been identified including arachidonyl ethanolamide (anandamide), 2-AG and noladin ether (Fowler, 2003). The best-characterized integrative model for how this system modulates neuronal activity is depolarization-induced suppression of excitatory (DSE) (Kreitzer and Regehr, 2001a) or inhibitory (DSI) neurotransmission (Wilson and Nicoll, 2001). A strong postsynaptic depolarization elevates the intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) stimulating the production of endocannabinoids, which diffuse across the synapse in a retrograde direction to act on presynaptic CB1 receptors that then inhibit neurotransmitter release. Generally, cannabinoids acting on CB1 receptors are thought to mimic the endogenous ligands (Shen et al., 1996). However, some cannabinoids are partial agonists making it less clear how endocannabinoids and exogenous cannabinoids in combination will affect synaptic transmission (Mackie et al., 1993, Pan et al., 1996).

THC is a partial agonist with a low efficacy for stimulation of [S35]GTPγS binding (Sim et al., 1996) and inhibition of synaptic transmission (Shen and Thayer, 1999). The functional response to a partial agonist, because of the low intrinsic activity for receptor activation, is especially sensitive to receptor density. Furthermore, the level of endocannabinoid tone will determine whether it acts as an agonist or antagonist.

Here, we test the hypothesis that THC can antagonize endocannabinoid-mediated inhibition of excitatory synaptic transmission. Using [Ca2+]i spiking as an index of glutamatergic synaptic transmission, we found that THC attenuated the inhibition of synaptic transmission produced by the endocannabinoid 2-AG. These results suggest that THC might exert effects on neurotransmission that are synapse specific and dependent on the activation state of the endocannabinoid system. A preliminary report of this work has appeared (Kelley and Thayer, 2003).

Section snippets

Materials

DMEM, sera, and glutamine were purchased from Gibco-BRL (Grand Island, NY, USA). Indo-1 was obtained from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR, USA). AM404 and 2-AG were purchased from Tocris (Ellisville, MO). Δ9-THC was obtained from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA) and purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). All other reagents were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA).

Cell culture

Rat hippocampal neurons were grown in primary culture as

2-AG inhibits excitatory neurotransmission via a cannabinoid receptor

The effects of cannabinoids on excitatory synaptic transmission were examined in cultures of rat hippocampal neurons. These cultures develop a dense synaptic network over 10–15 days in vitro. Lowering extracellular Mg2+ concentration ([Mg2+]o) from 0.9 to 0.1 mM evoked a repetitive pattern of [Ca2+]i spiking that was driven by glutamatergic synaptic transmission (Fig. 1) (McLeod et al., 1998). We have previously shown that the frequency of [Ca2+] spiking accurately reflects the intensity of

Discussion

THC acted as a competitive antagonist to reverse the inhibition of synaptic transmission produced by the endocannabinoid 2-AG. This observation raises the interesting possibility that the effects of THC will depend on the level of tone in endocannabinoid signaling pathways.

The endocannabinoid 2-AG displayed full agonist properties in the Ca2+ spiking assay with an EC50 of 63±13 nM, in good agreement with 2-AG-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase (Pinto et al., 1994). The phenomena of DSI and

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants DA07304 and DA11806 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and grant IBN0110409 from the National Science Foundation. The author B. Kelley was supported by NIDA training grant DA07097. We thank Wenna Lin for the excellent technical assistance.

References (39)

  • A.C. Porter et al.

    The endocannabinoid nervous system: unique opportunities for therapeutic intervention

    Pharmacology and Therapeutics

    (2001)
  • F. Berrendero et al.

    Analysis of cannabinoid receptor binding and mRNA expression and endogenous cannabinoid contents in the developing rat brain during late gestation and early postnatal period

    Synapse

    (1999)
  • C.S. Breivogel et al.

    Cannabinoid agonist signal transduction in rat brain: comparison of cannabinoid agonists in receptor binding, G-protein activation, and adenylyl cyclase inhibition

    Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

    (2000)
  • C.S. Breivogel et al.

    Chronic delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol treatment produces a time-dependent loss of cannabinoid receptors and cannabinoid receptor-activated G proteins in rat brain

    Journal of Neurochemistry

    (1999)
  • N.A. Darmani

    The potent emetogenic effects of the endocannabinoid, 2-AG (2-arachidonoylglycerol) are blocked by Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol and other cannabinoids

    Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

    (2002)
  • A. De Lean et al.

    Simultaneous analysis of families of sigmoidal curves: application to bioassay, radioligand assay, and physiological dose–response curves

    American Journal of Physiology

    (1978)
  • M. Glass et al.

    Agonist selective regulation of G proteins by cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors

    Molecular Pharmacology

    (1999)
  • R.E. Hampson et al.

    Cannabinoids reveal the necessity of hippocampal neural encoding for short-term memory in rats

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (2000)
  • B. Kelley et al.

    THC acts as an antagonist to the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonyl glycerol

  • Cited by (42)

    • Cannabinoids

      2022, Advances in Neurotoxicology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Inhibition of inhibitory neurons results in a net excitation of downstream target neurons. The active effects of cannabinoids such as Δ9-THC are likely associated with the role of CB1Rs to inhibit the release of primarily GABA but also glutamate (Gerdeman and Lovinger, 2001; Kelley and Thayer, 2004; Robbe et al., 2001; Roloff and Thayer, 2009; Shen and Thayer, 1999; Straiker and Mackie, 2005; Wilson and Nicoll, 2002) and possibly inhibit uptake of GABA and other neurotransmitters (Banerjee et al., 1975; Coull et al., 1997; Maneuf et al., 1996). In humans, marijuana can impair memory through the disruption of information encoding and recall of newly acquired information (Abel, 1971; Ranganathan and D'Souza, 2006; Wilson et al., 1994).

    • Neurocognitive effects of cannabis: Lessons learned from human experimental studies

      2018, Progress in Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is plausible that the different neurophysiological and behavioral responses observed between regular and non-regular users following acute challenge with Δ9-THC are due to changes occurring in the endocannabinoid system of those who have been exposed to cannabis prior to the experiment. Overall, previous cannabis exposure may have led to desensitization to the agonist effects of Δ9-THC and accentuation of its antagonist effects (Kelley and Thayer, 2004). This would explain why the detrimental effects of acute challenge with Δ9-THC are clearer in non-regular users or non-users, whereas for certain domains regular users performed better under the effect of Δ9-THC than under placebo or at baseline.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text