The renin–angiotensin system in a rat model of hepatic fibrosis: Evidence for a protective role of Angiotensin-(1–7)
Introduction
It is well established that the renin–angiotensin system (RAS) is involved in a number of fibrogenic processes [1], [2], [3], [4] and angiotensin (Ang) II acting on its Type 1 receptors (AT1) may have profibrotic and mitogenic effects [1], [4], [5]. Moreover, inhibition of the RAS was associated with reduced collagen expression and tissue fibrosis in models of kidney [2] and heart injury [3].
Recent studies also indicate that the RAS may be involved in hepatic fibrosis [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Thus activation of AT1 receptors by Ang II induces contraction and proliferation of hepatic stellate cells [11], [12], [13], [14] and increases the expression of collagen I and of the pro-fibrogenic cytokine transforming growth factor β-1 (TGFβ1) [8], [10]. The role of other angiotensins has not been evaluated in any detail in models of hepatic fibrosis. Among the putative mediators of RAS, Ang-(1–7) is particularly interesting. Ang-(1–7) can be formed directly from Ang I by neutral-endopeptidase 24.11 or prolyl-endopeptidase or from Ang II via prolyl-endopeptidase, prolyl-carboxypeptidase [15], [16] or the newly discovered enzyme ACE2 [17]. Experimental evidence has shown that Ang-(1–7) plays a counter-regulatory role in the RAS [15], [18] by opposing the vascular and proliferative effects of Ang II [15], [18], [19]. Therefore it is possible that Ang-(1–7) may also play a role in modulating the pro-fibrogenic effects of Ang II in hepatic fibrosis.
Ang-(1–7) is an endogenous ligand for the G-protein-coupled receptor Mas and the latter receptor appears to mediate most of the biological actions of Ang-(1–7) [20]. The physiological relevance of Ang-(1–7) can be evaluated by using the Mas receptor antagonist, A-779 [21], [22], [23]. The aims of the present study were to detect the plasma levels of components of the RAS in a rat model of bile duct ligation (BDL) and to evaluate the effect of Mas receptor antagonism on the early stages of hepatic fibrosis.
Section snippets
Animals and experimental design
Male Wistar rats (220–300 g) were housed in a controlled environment in our animal facility. To induce hepatic fibrosis, animals were anesthetized intraperitoneally with 2.5% tribromoethanol. Then, a 1.5 cm midline abdominal incision was made, the common bile duct located, double ligated with 4–0 silk and sectioned, as described elsewhere [24]. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of our Institution.
General measurements
Because there did not appear to be any difference in the many variables studied in the sham group at 1, 2, 4 and 6 weeks after sham operation, results from all the sham-operated groups were pooled for ease of presentation at Table 1. All rats had a similar body weight at the beginning of the experimental protocol and no differences were observed in water and food intake (Table 1). The 24-h urinary volume of animals at 1 and 2 weeks after BDL did not differ from sham-operated rats. However,
Discussion
The present study supports the concept that the RAS contributes to organ damage in the liver and in other tissues [2], [3], [4]. Our data show that the progression of liver dysfunction in BDL rats is characterized by marked changes in Ang II and Ang-(1–7) levels and that the overall activation of circulating RAS was associated in time with the progression of hepatic fibrosis. Furthermore, the pharmacological blockade of endogenous Ang-(1–7) accelerated liver fibrosis as demonstrated
References (42)
Angiotensin II and connective tissue: homeostasis and reciprocal regulation
Regul Pept
(1999)- et al.
Therapeutic strategies to halt renal fibrosis
Curr Opin Pharmacol
(2002) - et al.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition attenuates the progression of rat hepatic fibrosis
Gastroenterology
(2001) - et al.
Effect of Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade on experimental hepatic fibrosis
J Hepatol
(2001) - et al.
Up-regulation of components of the Renin Angiotensin System in the bile duct-ligated rat liver
Gastroenterology
(2002) - et al.
Angiotensin II type 1 receptor interaction is a major regulator for liver fibrosis development in rats
Hepatology
(2001) - et al.
Angiotensin II induces contraction and proliferation of human hepatic stellate cells
Gastroenterology
(2000) - et al.
Liver fibrosis: insights into migration of hepatic stellate cells in response to extracellular matrix and growth factors
Gastroenterology
(2003) - et al.
Transforming growth factor β and the liver
Hepatology
(2001) - et al.
Just the beginning: novel functions for Angiotensin-Converting enzymes
Curr Biol
(2002)
The renin angiotensin and kallikrein kinin systems
Int J Biochem Cell Biol
Characterization of a new angiotensin antagonist selective for angiotensin-(1–7) Evidence that the actions of angiotensin (1–7) are mediated by specific angiotensin receptors
Brain Res Bull
Diuresis and natriuresis produced by long term administration of a selective Angiotensin-(1–7) antagonist in normotensive and hypertensive rats
Regul Pept
Plasma angiotensin-(1–7) immunoreactivity is increased by salt load, water deprivation and hemorrhage
Peptides
Histologic grading and staging of chronic hepatitis
J Hepatol
The hyperdynamic circulation in cirrhosis: an overview
Pharmacol Ther
Opposing actions of angiotensins on angiogenesis
Life Sci
Vasopeptidase inhibition and Ang-(1–7) in the spontaneously hypertensive rat
Kidney Int
The role of the Renin Angiotensin System in the development of cardiovascular disease
Am J Cardiol
Molecular and cellular mechanisms of Angiotensin II-mediated cardiovascular and renal diseases
Pharmacol Rev
Angiotensin II receptors
J Am Soc Nephrol
Cited by (97)
Targeting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in fibrosis
2020, Matrix BiologyPeptidomic analysis of urine from youths with early type 1 diabetes reveals novel bioactivity of uromodulin peptides in vitro
2020, Molecular and Cellular ProteomicsCitation Excerpt :Alternate processing of the Ang I peptide results in a myriad of bioactive and inert peptide sequences (92–95). Notably, Ang (1–7) and Ang II (1–8) have opposing biological effects (96, 97), underscoring the significance of a single residue. Likewise, the bioactive UMOD-1 (SGSVIDQSRVLNLGPI) and the inert UMOD-3 (SVIDQSRVLNLGPI) peptides differ in two residues at the N terminus, suggesting that the loss of the serine-glycine residues at the N terminus may render a peptide inactive and could act as a means to “turn off” peptide bioactivity.
Limiting angiogenesis to modulate scar formation
2019, Advanced Drug Delivery ReviewsOral vitamin-A-coupled valsartan nanomedicine: High hepatic stellate cell receptors accessibility and prolonged enterohepatic residence
2018, Journal of Controlled Release