Elsevier

Brain Research Bulletin

Volume 74, Issue 5, 19 October 2007, Pages 369-375
Brain Research Bulletin

Research report
DAMGO and 6β-glycine substituted 14-O-methyloxymorphone but not morphine show peripheral, preemptive antinociception after systemic administration in a mouse visceral pain model and high intrinsic efficacy in the isolated rat vas deferens

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.07.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Peripheral μ-opioid receptors (MOR) have emerged as important components of inhibitory nociceptive pathways. Here, the antinociceptive effects of MOR agonists, the 6β-glycine derivative of 14-O-methyloxymorphone (HS-731), DAMGO and morphine were evaluated in a mouse model of visceral pain. The abdominal acetic acid-induced writhing test was used to examine the peripheral, preemptive antinociceptive opioid action on visceral nociception. HS-731 administered subcutaneously (s.c.) or intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) dose-dependently and completely inhibited writhing, being 24–598-fold more potent, depending on the administration route, than two selective MOR agonists, the enkephalin analogue [d-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly-ol5]enkephalin (DAMGO) and morphine. A longer duration of action (2–3 h) was induced by HS-731 given before acetic acid, while shorter effect was produced by morphine (30–60 min) and DAMGO (30–45 min). The antinociceptive effects of systemic opioids were reversed by the s.c. opioid antagonist, naloxone. Blocking of central MOR by the selective MOR antagonist d-Phe-Cys-Tyr-d-Trp-Arg-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2 (CTAP, i.c.v.) resulted in a significant reduction of antinociception of s.c. morphine, whereas it completely failed to antagonize the effects of systemic HS-731 or DAMGO. In in vitro studies, HS-731 and DAMGO, but not morphine showed high intrinsic efficacy, naltrexone-sensitive agonist effect at MOR of the rat vas deferens. These data demonstrate that selective activation of peripheral MOR by systemic s.c. HS-731 or DAMGO produces potent peripheral, preemptive visceral antinociception, while morphine's effects are mediated primarily through central mechanisms. Our findings support the role of peripheral MOR in the pathology of pain states involving sensitization of peripheral nociceptors.

Introduction

Opioids are the cornerstone drugs for the management of moderate to severe pain. Three different receptor classes, μ (MOR), δ (DOR) and κ (KOR), mediate the pharmacological actions of exogenous opioids and interact with endogenous peptides (i.e. enkephalins, dynorphins and endorphins) under physiological conditions [17]. Both, opioid receptors and endogenous opioids are widely distributed throughout the central and peripheral nervous system (CNS and PNS) as well as in peripheral tissues [23].

It is well established that stimulation of central opioid receptors results in analgesia by modulating nociceptive information [13], [17]. However, the central analgesic effects are also associated with a number of adverse actions, including respiratory depression, sedation and physical dependence [26]. Nowadays, an exciting aspect is represented by the substantial evidence emerging from experimental and clinical studies that opioid analgesia is not exclusively mediated by activation of opioid systems within the CNS. Intrinsic pain control can also occur in the periphery [3], [34]. Opioid receptor proteins and their mRNAs are localized in the cell bodies of primary afferent neurons and the occurrence of functional receptors has been demonstrated both on the presynaptic central and peripheral terminals [7], [30], [35]. The exact mechanisms of spinal pain transmission are not very well understood [6], [12], [38], [41]). Activation of peripheral receptors by locally injected opioids has been shown to induce potent and clinically measurable analgesia [36]. All these findings have shed new light on the pharmacological actions of opioid analgesics and the possibility of exploiting these properties.

Medicinal chemistry and opioid pharmacology focused increasingly on exploring the therapeutic potential of the peripheral opioid system by peripheralization of opioid agonists in order to minimize the activation of central opioid receptors [9], [36] aiming for the development of peripheral opioids as novel treatments for pain conditions which are often resistant to conventional drug therapies in human. One strategy to reduce the access of opioids to the CNS includes chemical modifications that increase their hydrophilicity. The 6β-glycine substituted 14-O-methyloxymorphone (HS-731; Fig. 1) is a zwitterionic molecule due to the presence of an amino acid residue (glycine) at C-6 of the morphinan which enhances hydrophilicity and restricts penetration across the blood–brain barrier [31]. Our earlier reports have described HS-731 as a potent opioid agonist with selectivity for the MOR [33]. Systemically (subcutaneously, s.c.) administered HS-731 produces peripherally mediated antinociceptive effect in rat models of acute nociception (tail-flick test) and inflammatory pain (formalin test, carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia) [5], [14]. Furthermore, this is the first peripherally restricted opioid described to be effective after oral administration by reversing mechanical hyperalgesia in rats with carrageenan-induced inflammation [5]. These positive results made HS-731 a good candidate for further in vitro and in vivo pharmacological investigations to delineate its selective peripheral action.

The aim of this study was first to evaluate the potential antinociceptive effect of the MOR agonist HS-731 in a mouse model of visceral pain induced by intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of acetic acid, and whether these effects are mediated via peripheral opioid receptors. In order to distinguish the central or peripheral site of actions of systemic HS-731, and the two selective MOR agonists, the enkephalin analogue, [d-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly-ol5]enkephalin (DAMGO), as well as the classical and clinically relevant opioid analgesic, morphine we examined the sensitivity of their antinociceptive actions to antagonism by intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) d-Phe-Cys-Tyr-d-Trp-Arg-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2 (CTAP), a highly selective MOR antagonist that should not cross the blood–brain barrier readily [20]. Using the abdominal writhing model, we also planned to examine the preemptive opioid antinociceptive actions on visceral nociception, a clinically significant condition.

Additionally, we tested the activity of HS-731 in rat vas deferens (RVD) containing low opioid-like receptor reserve [32] and compare its effect with DAMGO and morphine.

Section snippets

Materials

HS-731 was synthesized as previously described [31]. DAMGO and CTAP were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich, Budapest, Hungary. Morphine hydrochloride, naloxone hydrochloride and naltrexone were obtained from ICN, Tiszavasvari, Hungary. All drugs were dissolved in 0.9% saline solution for in vivo testing.

Animals

Male NMRI mice (20–35 g) and Wistar rats (180–240 g) were purchased from Toxicoop and Charles River, Budapest, Hungary, respectively. Animals were housed under a standard 12 h light:12 h dark cycle, in a

Dose- and time-dependent effects

The dose- and time-related antinociceptive effects of the three MOR agonists, HS-731, DAMGO and morphine, were evaluated after s.c. and i.c.v. administration routes in the acetic acid-induced writhing test in mice. Injection of acetic acid into the peritoneal cavity of mice resulted in an average of 24.1 ± 0.9 (n = 103) writhes during the 10 min period. As shown in Fig. 2, s.c. or i.c.v. administration (20 min before testing) of all opioid agonists produced a dose-dependent inhibition of acetic

Discussion

During the past two decades, peripheral opioid receptors have attracted great attention, particularly because the selective opioid agonists are potent analgesics at the site of injury, and should be devoid of severe adverse effects [9], [36].

Here, we report on the peripheral antinociceptive action of peripherally restricted morphinan HS-731 and the enkephalin analogue DAMGO, contrast to centrally acting morphine after systemic administration in a mouse model of visceral pain.

Animal models of

Conflict of interest

We hereby declare that according to our knowledge there is not any conflict of interest in the process of publishing the paper.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the European Community (EPILA, QLK6-1999-02334), the Hungarian Research Grants (OTKA K-60999 and ETT 441/2006) and the Austrian Science Foundation (P15481).

References (41)

  • S. Perrot et al.

    Effects of intraplantar morphine on paw edema and pain-related behaviour in a rat model of repeated acute inflammation

    Pain

    (1999)
  • A.Z. Ronai et al.

    Partial and full agonism in endomorphin derivatives: comparison by null and operational model

    Peptides

    (2006)
  • M. Schäfer et al.

    Inflammation enhances peripheral mu-opioid receptor-mediated analgesia, but not mu-opioid receptor transcription in dorsal root ganglia

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (1995)
  • C.F. Smith et al.

    Opiate receptors in the rat vas deferens

    Life Sci.

    (1983)
  • M. Spetea et al.

    In vitro opioid activity profiles of 6-amino acid substituted derivatives of 14-O-methyloxymorphone

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (2004)
  • M. Than et al.

    Concerted action of antiepileptic and antidepressant agents to depress spinal neurotransmission: possible use in the therapy of spasticity and chronic pain

    Neurochem. Int.

    (2007)
  • J. Wu et al.

    The role of c-AMP-dependent protein kinase in spinal cord and post synaptic dorsal column neurons in a rat model of visceral pain

    Neurochem. Int.

    (2007)
  • A. Barber et al.

    Opioid agonists and antagonists: an evaluation of their peripheral actions in inflammation

    Med. Res. Rev.

    (1992)
  • I. Bileviciute-Ljungar et al.

    Peripherally mediated antinociception of the mu-opioid receptor agonist 2-[(4,5alpha-epoxy-3-hydroxy-14beta-methoxy-17-methylmorphinan-6beta-yl)amino]acetic acid (HS-731) after subcutaneous and oral administration in rats with carrageenan-induced hindpaw inflammation

    J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.

    (2006)
  • R.M. Craft et al.

    Opioid antinociception in a rat model of visceral pain: systemic versus local drug administration

    J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.

    (1995)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text