Elsevier

Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews

Volume 65, Issue 10, 15 October 2013, Pages 1340-1356
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews

Intestinal drug transporters: An overview

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.042Get rights and content

Abstract

The importance of drug transporters as one of the determinants of pharmacokinetics has become increasingly evident [1]. While much research has been conducted focusing the role of drug transporters in the liver [2], [3], [4], [5] and kidney [2], [6], [7] less is known about the importance of uptake and efflux transporters identified in the intestine [8]. Over the past years the effects of intestinal transporters have been studied using in vivo models, in situ organ perfusions, in vitro tissue preparations and cell lines. This review aims to describe up to date findings regarding the importance of intestinal transporters on drug absorption and bioavailability, highlighting areas in need of further research. Wu and Benet [9] proposed a Biopharmaceutics Drug Disposition Classification System (BDDCS) that allows the prediction of transporter effects on the drug disposition of orally administered drugs. This review also discusses BDDCS predictions with respect to the role of intestinal transporters and intestinal transporter-metabolizing enzyme interplay on oral drug pharmacokinetics.

Introduction

Membrane transporters can be major determinants of the pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy profiles of drugs [1]. Transporters are the gatekeepers for cells and organelles, controlling uptake and efflux of crucial compounds such as sugars, amino acids, nucleotides, inorganic ions and drugs [10]. Specific membrane transporters are expressed in the luminal and/or basolateral membranes of enterocytes, hepatocytes, renal tubular epithelial cells and other important barrier tissues, including the blood–brain barrier, blood–testis barrier and the placental barrier [11]. Transporter expression in the intestine and/or liver, the two major sites affecting how much of a drug will get into the systemic circulation after an oral dose, suggests that factors affecting their function will be important determinants of oral drug pharmacokinetics. Regulatory elements controlling protein levels, genetic polymorphisms leading to increased or reduced function and coadministration with inhibitors are all important avenues by which a transporter's ability to transport substrates is altered [12]. While much research has been conducted focusing on the role of drug transporters in the liver [2], [3], [4], [5] and kidney [2], [6], [7] less emphasis has been placed on the importance of uptake and efflux transporters identified in the intestine [8]. In this review we will focus on the role of uptake and efflux transporters identified in the apical and basolateral membranes of the enterocytes with respect to substrate and inhibitor interactions. Detailed characterization, pharmacogenetics and mechanisms of transport can be found in several reviews [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23].

Section snippets

Intestinal drug transporters

Orally administered drugs must pass through the gut wall mucosa before reaching the capillaries that lead to the portal vein. This mucosal barrier consists of polarized enterocytes that are closely linked together by means of tight junctions. In these cells several drug transporters have been identified, but only a few are known to be involved in intestinal drug absorption (Fig. 1) (Table 1, Table 2). Thus, intestinal drug transporters are of increasing interest as evidence emerges about the

Synergistic action of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein

CYP3A4 is the most prominent oxidative cytochrome P450 enzyme present in human enterocytes. Despite the lower CYP3A4 content in the intestine relative to the liver, first-pass metabolism in the intestine by CYP3A affects a large number of drugs. CYP3A4 has conclusively been shown to be important in the disposition of midazolam [158] and cyclosporine [159] from studies in anhepatic patients. Drug interaction studies performed with grapefruit juice (inhibitor of intestinal CYP3A) have also shown

BDDCS prediction of transporter effects

Amidon et al. [169] devised a Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) that categorized drugs into four classes based on aqueous solubility and intestinal permeability, fundamental parameters controlling the rate and extent of drug absorption from immediate release (IR) solid oral dosage forms. In 2005, Wu and Benet [9] recognized that the overwhelming majority of Classes 1 and 2 high permeability drugs were extensively metabolized, while for the great majority of Classes 3 and 4 compounds

Intestinal permeability assessment

Due to the multivariate processes involved in the intestinal absorption of drugs it is often difficult to accurately predict the in vivo permeability characteristics of a compound. Several physicochemical parameters, in vitro and in vivo models can be used to estimate intestinal permeability [186]. Important physicochemical parameters are size, charge, lipophilicity and hydrogen-bonding potential as well as other molecular descriptors [187], [188]. In vitro methods include artificial lipid

Conclusions

One area of increasing interest is that of membrane transporters localized in the intestine. Enterocytes express several transporters belonging to the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) binding cassette (ABC) superfamily and the solute carrier (SLC) superfamilies, on the apical and basolateral membranes for the influx or efflux of endogenous substances and xenobiotics. Although a variety of transporters are expressed in the enterocyte, only a few have been investigated and are known to play a key

References (227)

  • Y.H. Liu et al.

    Multidrug resistance-associated proteins and implications in drug development

    Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol.

    (2010)
  • A.H. Schinkel et al.

    Mammalian drug efflux transporters of the ATP binding cassette (ABC) family: an overview

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (2003)
  • M.F. Fromm et al.

    The effect of rifampin treatment on intestinal expression of human MRP transporters

    Am. J. Pathol.

    (2000)
  • M.L. Ruiz et al.

    Induction of intestinal multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (Mrp2) by spironolactone in rats

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (2009)
  • A. Dahan et al.

    MRP2 mediated drug–drug interaction: indomethacin increases sulfasalazine absorption in the small intestine, potentially decreasing its colonic targeting

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2010)
  • K. Ohura et al.

    Evaluation of transport mechanism of prodrugs and parent drugs formed by intracellular metabolism in Caco-2 cells with modified carboxylesterase activity: temocapril as a model case

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (2011)
  • M.L. Vlaming et al.

    Physiological and pharmacological roles of ABCG2 (BCRP): recent findings in Abcg2 knockout mice

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (2009)
  • R.N. Peroni et al.

    Efavirenz is a substrate and in turn modulates the expression of the efflux transporter ABCG2/BCRP in the gastrointestinal tract of the rat

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (2011)
  • M.E. Juan et al.

    Multidrug resistance proteins restrain the intestinal absorption of trans-resveratrol in rats

    J. Nutr.

    (2010)
  • H. Tamaki et al.

    Inhibitory effects of herbal extracts on breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) and structure–inhibitory potency relationship of isoflavonoids

    Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet.

    (2010)
  • A. van Loevezijn et al.

    Inhibition of BCRP-mediated drug efflux by fumitremorgin-type indolyl diketopiperazines

    Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.

    (2001)
  • K.M. Giacomini et al.

    Membrane transporters in drug development

    Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.

    (2010)
  • M.K. DeGorter et al.

    Hepatic drug transporters, old and new: pharmacogenomics, drug response, and clinical relevance

    Hepatology

    (2009)
  • P. Li et al.

    Liver transporters in hepatic drug disposition: an update

    Curr. Drug Metab.

    (2009)
  • J.E. van Montfoort et al.

    Drug uptake systems in liver and kidney

    Curr. Drug Metab.

    (2003)
  • S. Oswald et al.

    Transporter-mediated uptake into cellular compartments

    Xenobiotica

    (2007)
  • C.Y. Wu et al.

    Predicting drug disposition via application of BCS: transport/absorption/elimination interplay and development of a biopharmaceutics drug disposition classification system

    Pharm. Res.

    (2005)
  • M.A. Hediger et al.

    The ABCs of solute carriers: physiological, pathological and therapeutic implications of human membrane transport proteinsIntroduction

    Pflugers Arch.

    (2004)
  • S. Shugarts et al.

    The role of transporters in the pharmacokinetics of orally administered drugs

    Pharm. Res.

    (2009)
  • R.M. Franke et al.

    Pharmacogenetics of drug transporters

    Curr. Pharm. Des.

    (2010)
  • C.D. Klaassen et al.

    Xenobiotic, bile acid, and cholesterol transporters: function and regulation

    Pharmacol. Rev.

    (2010)
  • Y. Shu

    Research progress in the organic cation transporters

    J. Cent. South Univ. (MedSci)

    (2011)
  • M.V. Varma et al.

    Targeting intestinal transporters for optimizing oral drug absorption

    Curr. Drug Metab.

    (2010)
  • Y. Shibayama et al.

    Effect of 5-fluorouracil treatment on SN-38 absorption from intestine in rats

    Biol. Pharm. Bull.

    (2011)
  • H.J. Maeng et al.

    1Alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on intestinal transporter function: studies with the rat everted intestinal sac

    Biopharm. Drug Dispos.

    (2011)
  • R. Bhardwaj

    Intestinal transporters in drug absorption

  • F. Muller et al.

    Transporter-mediated drug–drug interactions

    Pharmacogenomics

    (2011)
  • J.R. Kunta et al.

    Intestinal drug transporters: in vivo function and clinical importance

    Curr. Drug Metab.

    (2004)
  • A.B. Shapiro et al.

    Stimulation of P-glycoprotein-mediated drug transport by prazosin and progesterone. Evidence for a third drug-binding site

    Eur. J. Biochem.

    (1999)
  • S.M. He et al.

    Herb–drug interactions and mechanistic and clinical considerations

    Curr. Drug Metab.

    (2012)
  • W.Y. Kim et al.

    P-glycoprotein (P-gp/MDR1)-mediated efflux of sex-steroid hormones and modulation of P-gp expression in vitro

    Pharm. Res.

    (2004)
  • S.F. Zhou

    Structure, function and regulation of P-glycoprotein and its clinical relevance in drug disposition

    Xenobiotica

    (2008)
  • U. Hoffmann et al.

    The ABC transporters MDR1 and MRP2: multiple functions in disposition of xenobiotics and drug resistance

    Drug Metab. Rev.

    (2004)
  • R.S. Brown et al.

    Enhanced secretion of glycocholic acid in a specially adapted cell line is associated with overexpression of apparently novel ATP-binding cassette proteins

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1995)
  • J.J. Yang et al.

    P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein affect disposition of tandutinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor

    Drug Metab. Lett.

    (2010)
  • A. Swed et al.

    The role of P-glycoprotein in intestinal transport versus the BBB transport of tetraphenylphosphonium

    Mol. Pharm.

    (2009)
  • D.G. Bailey et al.

    Grapefruit juice–drug interactions

    Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol.

    (1998)
  • L.Z. Benet

    The drug transporter–metabolism alliance: uncovering and defining the interplay

    Mol. Pharm.

    (2009)
  • B.J. Gurley et al.

    Gauging the clinical significance of P-glycoprotein-mediated herb–drug interactions: comparative effects of St. John's wort, Echinacea, clarithromycin, and rifampin on digoxin pharmacokinetics

    Mol. Nutr. Food Res.

    (2008)
  • B. Greiner et al.

    The role of intestinal P-glycoprotein in the interaction of digoxin and rifampin

    J. Clin. Invest.

    (1999)
  • Cited by (258)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This review is part of the Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews theme issue on “Editor's Choice 2013”.

    View full text