Elsevier

Progress in Neurobiology

Volume 68, Issue 3, October 2002, Pages 209-245
Progress in Neurobiology

Alzheimer’s disease and the basal forebrain cholinergic system: relations to β-amyloid peptides, cognition, and treatment strategies

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0082(02)00079-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of degenerative dementia and is characterized by progressive impairment in cognitive function during mid- to late-adult life. Brains from AD patients show several distinct neuropathological features, including extracellular β-amyloid-containing plaques, intracellular neurofibrillary tangles composed of abnormally phosphorylated τ, and degeneration of cholinergic neurons of the basal forebrain. In this review, we will present evidence implicating involvement of the basal forebrain cholinergic system in AD pathogenesis and its accompanying cognitive deficits. We will initially discuss recent results indicating a link between cholinergic mechanisms and the pathogenic events that characterize AD, notably amyloid-β peptides. Following this, animal models of dementia will be discussed in light of the relationship between basal forebrain cholinergic hypofunction and cognitive impairments in AD. Finally, past, present, and future treatment strategies aimed at alleviating the cognitive symptomatology of AD by improving basal forebrain cholinergic function will be addressed.

Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of degenerative dementia of the human central nervous system (for reviews, see Katzman, 1986, Francis et al., 1999, Perry and Hodges, 1999, Selkoe, 2001). Although recent evidence suggests that AD is a heterogeneous disorder comprising several different phenotypic and genotypic expressions, AD can be characterized clinically by a progressive impairment in cognitive function during mid- to late-adult life with the initial symptoms typically being certain forms of memory and language losses (Katzman, 1986, Hodges and Patterson, 1995, Selkoe, 1997, Lawrence and Sahakian, 1998, Bozeat et al., 2000, Marin et al., 2002). Brains from AD patients show several distinct neuropathological features, including extracellular amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide-containing plaques, intracellular neurofibrillary tangles of abnormally phosphorylated τ, astrocytic gliosis, reactive micoglia, and inflammation, as well as neuronal and synaptic losses (for reviews, see Geula, 1998, Lee et al., 2001b, McGeer and McGeer, 2001, Schubert et al., 2001, Selkoe, 2001). Although these neuropathological hallmarks of AD are particularly prominent in areas such as the parietal and temporal cortices, the hippocampus, the entorhinal cortex, and the amygdala, one of the earliest pathological events in AD is thought to be the degeneration of cholinergic neurons of the basal forebrain (Bowen et al., 1976, Davies and Maloney, 1976; Whitehouse et al., 1982a, Whitehouse et al., 1982b; Coyle et al., 1983, Pearson et al., 1983). Moreover, in addition to significant neuronal cell loss within this brain region, evidence implicating the basal forebrain cholinergic system in AD neuropathology comes from numerous studies demonstrating decreases in choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) activity (Bowen et al., 1976, Davies and Maloney, 1976; Perry et al., 1977a, Perry et al., 1977b, Perry et al., 1978; Bowen et al., 1979; Whitehouse et al., 1982a, Whitehouse et al., 1982b; Wilcock et al., 1982, Coyle et al., 1983, DeKosky et al., 1992, Lehericy et al., 1993), high affinity choline uptake (HACU) (Rylett et al., 1983), acetylcholine (ACh) release (Nilsson et al., 1986), and both nicotinic and muscarinic ACh receptor binding (Araujo et al., 1988, Whitehouse et al., 1988, Aubert et al., 1992, Nordberg et al., 1992, Perry et al., 1995) in post-mortem brain tissue of AD patients compared to non-pathological control brains. These basal forebrain cholinergic deficits positively correlate with cognitive impairments in AD (Perry et al., 1978, Collerton, 1986, DeKosky et al., 1992), as well as with non-cognitive behavioral disturbances (Minger et al., 2000).

Indirect support for basal forebrain cholinergic system involvement in the cognitive deficits accompanying AD also comes from considerable psychopharmacological evidence indicating that systemic administration of cholinergic receptor antagonists (e.g. scopolamine) interferes with the acquisition and performance of a variety of memory tasks in both rodents and non-human primates (Aigner and Mishkin, 1986, Aigner et al., 1991, Fibiger et al., 1991, Miller and Desimone, 1993). Moreover, together with studies demonstrating a correlation between ChAT activity and pre-mortem mental test scores (Perry et al., 1978, Wilcock et al., 1982), it was the finding that cholinergic blockade in normal humans has negative effects on cognition (Drachman and Leavitt, 1974, Drachman and Sahakian, 1980) that led to the development of the “cholinergic hypothesis of geriatric memory dysfunction” as it relates to AD (Bartus et al., 1982, Perry, 1988, Bartus, 2000). According to this hypothesis, the deterioration of cognitive function associated with AD dementia in the elderly is attributable to a decline in basal forebrain cholinergic neurotransmission. Support for this “cholinergic hypothesis” of cognitive impairment in AD comes from the fact that drugs that potentiate central cholinergic function have thus far proven to be the most effective forms of therapeutic treatment against the disease. However, such cholinomimetic replacement strategies have only met with limited success (Gauthier, 1999, Gauthier, 2002; Giacobini, 2000a, Giacobini, 2000b) in alleviating the cognitive deficits in AD, emphasizing the need for a better understanding of the way in which changes in central cholinergic systems are related to both AD symptomatology and disease progression.

This review will summarize evidence implicating basal forebrain cholinergic system involvement in AD pathogenesis and its accompanying cognitive deficits. Particular attention will be focused on recent results indicating a link between cholinergic mechanisms and the pathogenic events that characterize AD, notably in relation to Aβ peptides. Moreover, evidence indicative of impairments in trophic support for the basal forebrain cholinergic system in AD will be pointed out. The latest findings to emerge from animal models of dementia will be discussed in light of the new insights these studies provide into the relationship between basal forebrain cholinergic hypofunction and cognitive impairments in AD. Finally, we shall conclude by reviewing past, present, and future treatment strategies aimed at alleviating the cognitive symptomatology of AD by boosting basal forebrain cholinergic functions.

Section snippets

The basal forebrain cholinergic system

The basal forebrain cholinergic system is comprised of the nucleus basalis of Meynert (NBM), the horizontal and vertical diagonal bands of Broca (HDBB and VDBB, respectively), and the medial septal nucleus (MS) (for reviews, see Fibiger, 1982, Semba and Fibiger, 1989, Mesulam, 1996). This neuronal system provides the primary cholinergic innervations to both limbic and cortical brain structures. Specifically, neurons situated in the MS innervate predominantly the hippocampus, whereas those of

The cholinergic lesion in Alzheimer’s disease

There is long standing evidence suggesting that the cholinergic deficit contributes significantly to the neuropsychiatric manifestations of AD. Numerous biochemical and in situ hybridization studies reported a marked and region-dependent loss in ChAT activity (from 30 to 90%) and ChAT mRNA levels (about 50%) in the temporal lobe and frontal and parietal cortices of the AD brain (Davies and Maloney, 1976, Bowen et al., 1976, Araujo et al., 1988, Zubenko et al., 1989). The loss in ChAT activity

Evidence for impaired trophic support of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons in Alzheimer’s disease

Nerve growth factor is the most important target-derived trophic factor for basal forebrain cholinergic neurons (BFCNs) identified to date. In vivo studies have clearly shown that endogenous NGF contributes to the development, maintenance and function of BFCNs, with profound influence on ChAT activity, HACU, ACh release, and somata size (Vantini et al., 1989, Li et al., 1995, Fagan et al., 1997, Debeir et al., 1999, Ruberti et al., 2000). Moreover, interaction between target-derived NGF and

Relationships between cholinergic neurotransmission and amyloid-β peptides: in vitro clues and their implications for Alzheimer’s disease

As discussed previously, deficits in the basal forebrain cholinergic system are prominent and consistently recognized features of end-stage AD brains. However, the existence of possible relationships between cholinergic markers and other features of AD pathology have become evident only recently (for reviews, see Quirion, 1993, Auld et al., 1998, Geula, 1998, Quirion et al., 1998, Lee et al., 2001b, McGeer and McGeer, 2001, Schubert et al., 2001, Selkoe, 2001, Isacson et al., 2002). It is clear

Modelling Alzheimer’s disease-type dementia in animals

Despite the wealth of information that can be acquired through the neuropsychological study of AD patients and the post-mortem analysis of human AD brain tissue, establishing a valid animal model of the cognitive and neuropathological deficits observed in AD is a crucial step in gaining a better understanding of the disease. The development of valid behavioral models of AD, however, has not proven to be an easy task. One reason for the relative lack of success may be related to the sometimes

Cholinergic strategies for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease

Numerous studies have confirmed basal forebrain cholinergic deficits in AD, whose severity could correlate with the extent of cognitive impairments observed in the disease. These observations have led to several different treatment strategies aimed at boosting cholinergic function, and include increased ACh production via supplementation with cholinergic precursors, inhibition of synaptic ACh degradation, direct stimulation of post-synaptic muscarinic and nicotinic receptors, enhancement of ACh

Conclusion

A reduction in basal forebrain cholinergic markers is one of the key defining neurochemical features of the AD brain. We have indicated here that: (1) BFCN function (e.g. ACh release, receptor signaling) is impaired by Aβ, which is believed to be a causal factor in AD; (2) the cholinergic deficit likely makes a significant contribution to cognitive impairments associated with AD; and (3) current cholinergic based therapies provide some relief to these cognitive impairments. However, it is clear

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr. Satyabrata Kar (Douglas Hospital Research Centre, McGill University) for inspirational conversations. DSA was supported with Ph.D. studentships from the Alzheimer Society of Canada and the Medical Research Council of Canada (now the Canadian Institutes for Health Research; CIHR) and is currently supported a post-doctoral fellowship from the National Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada. TJK was supported by a post-doctoral fellowship from

References (504)

  • W. Billard et al.

    Diphenylsulfone muscarinic antagonists: piperidine derivatives with high M2 selectivity and improved potency

    Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.

    (2000)
  • D.R. Borchelt et al.

    Accelerated amylois deposition in the brains of transgenic mice coexpressing presenilin-1 and amyloid precursor proteins

    Neuron

    (1997)
  • C.D. Boyle et al.

    Benzylidene ketal derivatives as M2 muscarinic receptor antagonists

    Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.

    (2000)
  • F.C. Bronfman et al.

    Acetylcholinesterase-positive fiber deafferentation and cell shrinkage in the septohippocampal pathway of aged amyloid precursor protein London mutant transgenic mice

    Neurobiol. Dis.

    (2000)
  • T. Burt et al.

    Donepezil in treatment-resistant bipolar disorder

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (1999)
  • A.E. Butt et al.

    Transverse patterning reveals a dissociation of simple and configural learning abilities in rats with 192 IgG-saporin lesions of the nucleus basalis magnocellularis

    Neurobiol. Learn. Mem.

    (2002)
  • G.J. Carey et al.

    SCH-57790, a selective muscarinic M2 receptor antagonist, releases acetylcholine and produces cognitive enhancement in laboratory animals

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (2001)
  • J. Chan et al.

    A role for the nicotinic alpha-bungarotoxin receptor in neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells

    Neuroscience

    (1993)
  • M.A. Chishti et al.

    Early-onset amyloid deposition and cognitive deficits in transgenic mice expressing a double mutant form of amyloid precursor protein 695

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2001)
  • E.L. Cohen et al.

    Brain acetylcholine: increase after systemic choline administration

    Life Sci.

    (1975)
  • V.I. Cohen et al.

    In vitro and in vivo M2 muscarinic subtype selectivity of some dibenzodiazepinones and pyridobenzodiazepinones

    Brain Res.

    (2000)
  • D. Collerton

    Cholinergic function and intellectual decline in Alzheimer’s disease

    Neuroscience

    (1986)
  • V. Coronas et al.

    Acetylcholine induces neuritic outgrowth in rat primary olfactory bulb cultures

    Neuroscience

    (2000)
  • N.D. Cosford et al.

    Recombinant human receptors and functional assays in the discovery of altinicline (SIB-1508Y), a novel acetylcholine-gated ion channel (nAChR) agonist

    Pharm. Acta Helv.

    (2000)
  • J.A. Court et al.

    Nicotinic receptors in human brain: topography and pathology

    J. Chem. Neuroanat.

    (2000)
  • A.C. Cuello

    Trophic responses of forebrain cholinergic neurons: a discussion

    Prog. Brain Res.

    (1993)
  • J.L. Cummings et al.

    Physostigmine ameliorates the delusions of Alzheimer’s disease

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (1993)
  • J.L. Cummings et al.

    The relationship between donepezil and behavioral disturbances in patients with Alzheimer’s disease

    Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry

    (2000)
  • P. Davies et al.

    Selective loss of central cholinergic neurons in Alzheimer’s disease

    Lancet

    (1976)
  • T.G. Aigner et al.

    Transient impairment of recognition memory following ibotenic-acid lesions of the basal forebrain in macaques

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1991)
  • K. Alagiakrishnan et al.

    Use of donepezil in elderly patients with Alzheimer’s disease—a Hawaii based study

    Hawaii Med. J.

    (2000)
  • K. Alhainon et al.

    Psychometric discrimination of tetrahydroaminoacridine responders in Alzheimer’s patients

    Dementia

    (1993)
  • M. Alkondon et al.

    Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor activation modulates gamma-aminobutyric acid release from CA1 neurons of rat hippocampal slices

    J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.

    (1997)
  • D.D. Allen et al.

    Beta-amyloid induced increase in choline flux across PC12 cell membranes

    Neurosci. Lett.

    (1997)
  • K. Amouyal-Barkate et al.

    Abnormal movements with donepezil in Alzheimer’s disease

    Ann. Pharmacother.

    (2000)
  • J.S. Andrews et al.

    Effects of cholinergic and non-cholinergic drugs on visual discrimination and delayed visual discrimination performance in rats

    Psychopharmacology (Berl.)

    (1992)
  • D.M. Araujo et al.

    Differential alteration of various cholinergic markers in cortical and subcortical regions of human brain in Alzheimer’s disease

    J. Neurochem.

    (1988)
  • T. Arendt et al.

    Amyloid deposition in the nucleus basalis of Meynert complex: a topographic marker for degenerating cell clusters in Alzheimer’s disease

    Acta Neuropathol. (Berl.)

    (1988)
  • C. Arias et al.

    β-Amyloid peptide fragment 25–35 potentiates the calcium-dependent release of excitatory amino acids from depolarized hippocampal slices

    J. Neurosci. Res.

    (1995)
  • K.H. Ashe

    Learning and memory in transgenic mice modeling Alzheimer’s disease

    Learn. Mem.

    (2001)
  • C.M. Atkins et al.

    The MAPK cascade is required for mammalian associative learning

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (1998)
  • I. Aubert et al.

    Comparative alterations of nicotinic and muscarinic binding sites in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases

    J. Neurochem.

    (1992)
  • I. Aubert et al.

    Comparative ontogenic profile of cholinergic markers, including nicotinic and muscarinic receptors, in the rat brain

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1996)
  • D.S. Auld et al.

    Neurotrophins differentially enhance acetylcholine release, acetylcholine content and choline acetyltransferase activity in basal forebrain neurons

    J. Neurochem.

    (2001)
  • D.S. Auld et al.

    Nerve growth factor rapidly induces prolonged acetylcholine release from cultured basal forebrain neurons: differentiation between neuromodulatory and neurotrophic influences

    J. Neurosci.

    (2001)
  • E.E. Avery et al.

    Potential role of muscarinic agonists in Alzheimer’s disease

    Drugs Aging

    (1997)
  • V. Baekelandt et al.

    Gene therapeutic strategies for neurodegenerative diseases

    Curr. Opin. Mol. Ther.

    (2000)
  • D.L. Bai et al.

    Huperzine A, a potential therapeutic agent for treatment of Alzheimer’s disease

    Curr. Med. Chem.

    (2000)
  • T.M. Ballard et al.

    The acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, ENA 713 (Exelon), attenuates the working memory impairment induced by scopolamine in an operant DNMTP task in rats

    Psychopharmacology (Berl.)

    (1999)
  • T.M. Ballard et al.

    Effect of a thyrotropin-releasing hormone analogue, RX77368, on AMPA-induced septal–hippocampal lesioned rats in an operant delayed non-matching to position test

    Psychopharmacology (Berl.)

    (1996)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text