Elsevier

Appetite

Volume 7, Issue 1, March 1986, Pages 1-17
Appetite

Specific postoperative syndromes after total and selective vagotomies in the rat1

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6663(86)80038-1Get rights and content

Male Sprague-Dawley rats which survived bilateral subdiaphragmatic vagotomy (with hepatic branch intact) exhibited an acute syndrome of hypophagia, hypodipsia and severe loss of body weight when maintained on solid food and water for 14 days after vagotomy. This post vagotomy syndrome was attenuated when rats were maintained on a liquid diet (116EC) chosen to minimize postvagotomy dysphagia and abnormal gastric retention of food; vagotomized rats were hypophagic and lost body weight, but the degree of weight loss was not so severe as for vagotomized rats eating solid food. When rats with total subdiaphragramatic vagotomy were maintained on palatable sweet milk food, the acute postvagotomy syndrome was abolished; these vagotomized rats ate and drank as much as rats with sham vagotomy and they did not lose weight. When rats that underwent selective hepatic, gastric or coeliac vagotomy were maintained on the sweet milk diet, three different postoperative syndromes occurred: after selective hepatic vagotomy, rats were hyperphagic, hyperdipsic and gained body weight at a greater than normal rate; after selective gastric vagotomy, rats lost weight despite relatively normal food and water intakes; and after selective coeliac vagotomy, there was no change in food or water intakes or body weight. These results demonstrate that a sweet milk diet abolishes the anorexia, hypodipsia and weight loss that usually occur in vagotomized rats maintained on pellets and water. Use of this sweet milk diet revealed different acute syndromes after bilateral and selective vagotomies. The differences among the syndromes suggest that hepatic, gastric and coeliac vagal branches serve different functions in the control of food and water intake and body weight.

References (38)

  • P.E. Sawchenko et al.

    Effects of gastric vs. complete subdiaphragmatic vagotomy on hypothalamic hyperphagia and obesity

    Physiology and Behavior

    (1981)
  • P.E. Sawchenko et al.

    Effects of selective vagotomies on knife cut-induced hypothalamic obesity: differential results on lab chow vs. high-fat diets

    Physiology and Behavior

    (1981)
  • A. Sclafani et al.

    Dietary selection in vagotomized rats

    Journal of the Autonomic Nervous System

    (1983)
  • G.P. Smith et al.

    Effects of total and selective abdominal vagotomies on water intake in rats

    Journal of the Autonomic Nervous System

    (1983)
  • G.P. Smith et al.

    Abdominal vagotomy does not block the satiety effect of bombesin in the rat

    Peptides

    (1981)
  • C.T. Snowdon et al.

    Weight and regulatory deficits in vagotomized rats: a reexamination

    Behavioral and Neural Biology

    (1979)
  • M.G. Tordoff et al.

    Hepatic vagotomy (partial hepatic denervation) does not alter ingestive responses to metabolic challenges

    Physiology and Behavior

    (1982)
  • A. Adachi et al.

    An hepatic osmoreceptor mechanism in the rat: electrophysiological and behavioral studies

    American Journal of Physiology

    (1976)
  • H.D. Becker et al.

    Postgastrectomy and postvagotomy syndromes

    (1980)
  • Cited by (72)

    • The controversial role of the vagus nerve in mediating ghrelin's actions: gut feelings and beyond

      2022, IBRO Neuroscience Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      Surgical vagotomy is a classical strategy to physically interrupt vagal fibers. Surgical vagotomy includes either total (bilateral) subdiaphragmatic vagotomy, which leads to severe hypophagia and body weight loss and requires the use of liquid diets to minimize post-vagotomy symptoms, or selective vagotomy such as gastric vagotomy that has less severe consequences (Kraly et al., 1986). Importantly, vagotomy abolishes afferent and efferent transmissions and, consequently, it does not allow to study their differential roles.

    • Impaired vagus function in rats suppresses bile acid synthesis in the liver by disrupting tight junctions and activating Fxr-Fgf15 signaling in the intestine

      2018, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      The surgery in the Sham group followed precisely the same procedure as in the vagotomy group, but the vagus nerve was left intact. Body weights were monitored throughout the study because loss of body weight is an indicator for a successful vagotomy surgery [11,12]. On the seventh day after surgery, rats were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg, i.p.) and the common bile duct of each rat was cannulated with a 30-gauge needle attached to PE-10 tubing.

    • Cognitive effects of subdiaphragmatic vagal deafferentation in rats

      2017, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
      Citation Excerpt :

      To date, it is the most complete and selective vagal deafferentation method for all abdominal visceral fibers and critically differs from total subdiaphragmatic vagotomy (TVX) models, the latter of which leads to a disconnection of both the afferent and efferent fibers of the vagus nerve below the diaphragm (Bercik et al., 2011; Bravo et al., 2011). Unlike TVX (Kraly, Jerome, & Smith, 1986), SDA allows for a discrimination of the relative functional contribution of vagal afferents versus efferents in the absence of severe side effects such as disturbances in gastrointestinal motility and secretion, hypophagia and subsequent body weight loss (Arnold et al., 2006; Azari et al., 2014; Klarer et al., 2014). Based on the reported effects of VNS on working memory (Beste et al., 2016), recognition memory (Clark et al., 1999), and cognitive flexibility (Ghacibeh, Shenker, Shenal, Uthman, & Heilman, 2006a), we compared the performance of SDA and Sham-operated rats in these cognitive domains.

    • Gut vagal afferents are necessary for the eating-suppressive effect of intraperitoneally administered ginsenoside Rb1 in rats

      2015, Physiology and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      SDA is a surgical procedure, which eliminates all neuronal signals mediated via vagal afferent fibers from the upper gut, including the liver, while leaving half of the vagal efferent fibers intact [19,6]. Therefore, different from what occurs with gastric vagotomy, which inevitably blocks gut vagal efferent traffic and often produces gastrointestinal motor and secretory dysfunction, anorexia, and malnutrition in both rats and humans [26,27], SDA has less side effects that might interfere with the normal control of food intake and consequently affect the results of Rb1 treatment. In the present study, we attempted to maximize the validity of our tests by including only data from animals that passed stringent functional criteria for complete lesions.

    • Subdiaphragmatic vagotomy promotes nociceptive sensitivity of deep tissue in rats

      2009, Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although no significant change in body weight at baseline between groups (347±14 g vs. 350±10 g, P=0.59; subdiaphragmatic vagotomy vs. sham) were found, the apparent decrease of body weight following subdiaphragmatic vagotomy was observed from day 3 (339±10 g vs. 377±5 g, P=0.004; subdiaphragmatic vagotomy vs. sham) to day 28 (427±12 g vs. 481±8 g, P=0.003; subdiaphragmatic vagotomy vs. sham) after operation. This result was consistent with those in previous reports (Opsahl and Powley, 1977; Kraly et al., 1986), which indicates that the operation was successful. The baseline withdrawal threshold was similar in sham-operated and subdiaphragmatic vagotomized rats.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    This research was supported by NIMH grant MH15455 and Career Scientist Award MH00149 (to G.P.S.), a NIH New Investigator Research Award NS19133 (to F.S.K.) and a Colgate University Carter-Wallace Fellowship (29-012-60-16).

    View full text