Research report
Dopamine gating of glutamatergic sensorimotor and incentive motivational input signals to the striatum

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4328(02)00285-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Dopamine (DA) neurons of the substantia nigra (SN) and ventral tegmental area (VTA) respond to a wide category of salient stimuli. Activation of SN and VTA DA neurons, and consequent release of nigrostriatal and mesolimbic DA, modulates the processing of concurrent glutamate inputs to dorsal and ventral striatal target regions. According to the view described here, this occurs under conditions of unexpected environmental change regardless of whether that change is rewarding or aversive. Nigrostriatal and mesolimbic DA activity gates the input of sensory, motor, and incentive motivational (e.g. reward) signals to the striatum. In light of recent single-unit and brain imaging data, it is suggested that the striatal reward signals originate in the orbitofrontal cortex and basolateral amygdala (BLA), regions that project strongly to the striatum. A DA signal of salient unexpected event occurrence, from this framework, gates the throughput of the orbitofrontal glutamate reward input to the striatum just as it gates the throughput of corticostriatal sensory and motor signals needed for normal response execution. Processing of these incoming signals is enhanced when synaptic DA levels are high, because DA enhances the synaptic efficacy of strong concurrent glutamate inputs while reducing the efficacy of weak glutamate inputs. The impairments in motor performance and incentive motivational processes that follow from nigrostriatal and mesolimbic DA loss can be understood in terms of a single mechanism: abnormal processing of sensorimotor and incentive motivation-related glutamate input signals to the striatum.

Section snippets

Overview

Dopamine (DA) neurons of the substantia nigra (SN) and ventral tegmental area (VTA) respond to unexpected reward events [102]. However these cells respond to a wide category of salient stimuli [57], [99]-unexpected rewards are one member of this category. While it has been suggested that reward stimuli may be unique in producing a phasic DA response and that other arousing stimuli may produce only gradual DA elevations [102], this assumption is not made here. Novel, intense, rewarding,

DA neurons respond to salient unexpected events

Among the attributes that may imbue an event with salience are 1) novelty, 2) primary and conditioned reward properties, 3) primary and conditioned aversive properties, and 4) physical characteristics such as high intensity and fast rise-time. VTA DA neurons, i.e. those that give rise to mesolimbocortical DA pathways, respond to each of these types of salient events [57]. Single-unit recordings have demonstrated that VTA DA neurons show phasic elevations in activity in response to novel events

DA selectively promotes the processing of strong glutamate inputs to the striatum

If DA is a gatekeeper for glutamate input to the striatum, it is a selective gatekeeper that, within dorsal and ventral striatal regions, enhances the impact of strong input signals while dampening the impact of weaker signals [26], [27], [67], [88]. Cells in the dorsal and ventral striatum undergo transitions from a state of hyperpolarization (ca. −80 mV), far below the cell's action potential threshold, to a less polarized state (ca. −60 mV), within close range of action potential threshold

DA activity gates the throughput of sensorimotor and incentive motivational inputs to the striatum

The dorsal striatum receives glutamate inputs [42], [77] from virtually all sensory and motor regions of the cerebral cortex [64], [68], [71], [78], [107]. Neurons in the dorsolateral striatum (putamen) fire in relation to the movement of particular body parts [5], [23], [30], [31], [81], [121], and in some cases particular joints [2], [5], [31]. Some putamen cells show activity during the preparation of a movement [2], [53]. In some of these neurons, the neuronal activity during movement

Striatal plasticity: stimulus-response learning, salience assignment to synaptic inputs, and/or stimulus-response-outcome chunking

The prior discussion suggested that DA neurons are activated by salient environmental change and that elevations in synaptic DA activity within the striatum increase signal-to-noise ratios, permitting strong corticostriatal inputs privileged access to striatal outputs, by amplifying strong inputs and dampening the impact of weak (task-irrelevant) inputs. Further, it was noted that glutamate inputs to the striatum represent not only sensory and motor events, but also events coded on the basis of

Acknowledgements

I gratefully acknowledge Wayne Wicklegren, Marcel Kinsbourne, Jennifer Mangels, Peter Balsam, Yaniv Eyny, Amy Hale, Won Yung Choi, Michael Drew and Johannes Schwaninger with whom I have had stimulating discussions of these issues.

References (129)

  • J. Cho et al.

    Distributions of single neurons related to body parts in the lateral striatum of the rat

    Brain Res.

    (1997)
  • C.L. Duvauchelle et al.

    Haloperidol attenuates conditioned place preferences produced by electrical stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1991)
  • C.L. Duvauchelle et al.

    Opposite effects of prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens infusions of flupenthixol on stimulant-induced locomotion and brain stimulation reward

    Brain Res.

    (1992)
  • A. Ettenberg et al.

    Pimozide prevents the response-reinstating effects of water reinforcement in rats

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1990)
  • B.J. Everitt

    Sexual motivation: a neural and behavioral analysis of the mechanisms underlying appetitive and copulatory responses of male rats

    Neurosci. BioBehav. Rev.

    (1990)
  • W.J. Freed

    Glutamatergic mechanisms mediating stimulant and antipsychotic drug effects

    Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.

    (1994)
  • A.M. Graybiel

    The basal ganglia and chunking of action repertoires

    Neurobiol. Learn Mem.

    (1998)
  • F.A. Guarraci et al.

    An electrophysiological characterization of ventral tegmental area dopaminergic neurons during differential pavlovian fear conditioning in the awake rabbit

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (1999)
  • J.L. Haracz et al.

    Striatal single-unit responses to amphetamine and neuroleptics in freely moving rats

    Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.

    (1993)
  • L. Heimer et al.

    Substantia innominata: a notion, which impedes clinical–anatomical correlations in neuropsychiatric disorders

    Neuroscience

    (1997)
  • L. Hernandez et al.

    Food reward and cocaine increase extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens as measured by microdialysis

    Life Sci.

    (1988)
  • J.C. Horvitz

    Mesolimbocortical and nigrostriatal dopamine responses to salient non-reward events

    Neuroscience

    (2000)
  • J.C. Horvitz et al.

    Haloperidol blocks the response-reinstating effects of food reward: a methodology for separating neuroleptic effects on reinforcement and motor processes

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1988)
  • J.C. Horvitz et al.

    Burst activity of ventral tegmental dopamine neurons is elicited by sensory stimuli in the awake cat

    Brain Res.

    (1997)
  • S. Ikemoto et al.

    The role of nucleus accumbens dopamine in motivated behavior: a unifying interpretation with special reference to reward seeking

    Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev.

    (1999)
  • B. Jones et al.

    Limbic lesions and the problem of stimulus-reinforcement associations

    Exp. Neurol.

    (1972)
  • A.E. Kelley et al.

    The amygdalostriatal projection in the rat-an anatomical study by anterograde and retrograde tracing methods

    Neuroscience

    (1982)
  • H. Kunzle

    Bilateral projections from precentral motor cortex to the putamen and other parts of the basal ganglia. An autoradiographic study in Macaca fascicularis

    Brain Res.

    (1975)
  • S.L. Liles

    Cortico–striatal evoked potentials in the monkey (Macaca mulatta)

    Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1975)
  • G.P. Mark et al.

    An appetitively conditioned taste elicits a preferential increase in mesolimbic dopamine release

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1994)
  • P.L. McGeer et al.

    A glutamatergic corticostriatal path

    Brain Res.

    (1977)
  • A.J. McGeorge et al.

    The organization of the projection from the cerebral cortex to the striatum in the rat

    Neuroscience

    (1989)
  • A.K. Moschovakis et al.

    The microscopic anatomy and physiology of the mammalian saccadic system

    Prog. Neurobiol.

    (1996)
  • P. O'Donnell et al.

    Dopaminergic reduction of excitability in nucleus accumbens neurons recorded in vitro

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (1996)
  • S. Pecina et al.

    Pimozide does not shift palatability: separation of anhedonia from sensorimotor suppression by taste reactivity

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1997)
  • C.M. Pennartz et al.

    The nucleus accumbens as a complex of functionally distinct neuronal ensembles: an integration of behavioral, electrophysiological and anatomical data

    Prog. Neurobiol.

    (1994)
  • C.M. Pennartz et al.

    The glutamate hypothesis of reinforcement learning

    Prog. Brain Res.

    (2000)
  • P. Redgrave et al.

    Is the short-latency dopamine response too short to signal reward error

    Trends Neurosci.

    (1999)
  • T.W. Robbins et al.

    Limbic–striatal interactions in reward-related processes

    Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.

    (1989)
  • J.D. Salamone

    The involvement of nucleus accumbens dopamine in appetitive and aversive motivation

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (1994)
  • J.D. Salamone et al.

    Behavioral functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine: empirical and conceptual problems with the anhedonia hypothesis

    Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.

    (1997)
  • E. Acquas et al.

    SCH 23390 blocks drug-conditioned place-preference and place-aversion: anhedonia (lack of reward) or apathy (lack of motivation) after dopamine-receptor blockade

    Psychopharmacology

    (1989)
  • G.E. Alexander

    Selective neuronal discharge in monkey putamen reflects intended direction of planned limb movements

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1987)
  • G.E. Alexander et al.

    Neural representations of the target (goal) of visually guided arm movements in three motor areas of the monkey

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1990)
  • G.E. Alexander et al.

    Microstimulation of the primate neostriatum. II. Somatotopic organization of striatal microexcitable zones and their relation to neuronal response properties

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1985)
  • T. Aosaki et al.

    Effect of the nigrostriatal dopamine system on acquired neural responses in the striatum of behaving monkeys

    Science

    (1994)
  • P. Apicella et al.

    Responses to reward in monkey dorsal and ventral striatum

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1991)
  • A. Bechara et al.

    Dissociation of working memory from decision making within the human prefrontal cortex

    J. Neurosci.

    (1998)
  • R.J. Beninger et al.

    The effect of pimozide on the establishment of conditioned reinforcement

    Psychopharmacology (Berlin)

    (1980)
  • M. Bertolucci-D'Angio et al.

    Differential effects of forced locomotion, tail-pinch, immobilization, and methyl-beta-carboline carboxylate on extracellular 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid levels in the rat striatum, nucleus accumbens, and prefrontal cortex: an in vivo voltammetric study

    J. Neurochem.

    (1990)
  • Cited by (184)

    • On the pathophysiology and treatment of akinetic mutism

      2020, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
    • How the brain gets a roaring campfire: Input and output functions

      2020, The Interdisciplinary Handbook of Perceptual Control Theory: Living Control Systems IV
    • The effect of salient stimuli on neural oscillations, isometric force, and their coupling

      2019, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, sensory and motor systems must cooperate, intertwining the detection of behaviourally-relevant information with the execution of appropriate motor responses (Prinz, 1997; Hommel et al., 2001; Ullsperger et al., 2014; Wessel and Aron, 2017). However, sensory and motor systems are often studied in isolation, and the neurophysiological consequences of sudden environmental changes are mostly interpreted from a sensory perspective (Arnal and Giraud, 2012; Jensen et al., 2012), ignoring the principle that perception ultimately serves and guides action (Wolpert and Kawato, 1998; Horvitz, 2002). To fill this gap, we recently explored the effect of unexpected sensory events on both electrocortical brain activity and motor output (Novembre et al., 2018).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text