Review
Molecular pharmacology of the CFTR Cl channel

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-6147(99)01386-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Dysfunction of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) Cl channel is associated with a wide spectrum of disease. In the search for modulators of CFTR, pharmacological agents that interact directly with the CFTR Cl channel have been identified. Some agents stimulate CFTR by interacting with the nucleotide-binding domains that control channel gating, whereas others inhibit CFTR by binding within the channel pore and preventing Cl permeation. Knowledge of the molecular pharmacology of CFTR might lead to new treatments for diseases caused by the dysfunction of CFTR.

Section snippets

Activators of CFTR

To date, over 800 disease-causing mutations have been identified in the CFTR gene (see http://www.genet.sickkids.on.ca/cftr/). Based on studies of the molecular mechanisms of CFTR Cl channel dysfunction, Welsh and Smith13 proposed a classification of CF-associated mutations. They identified four general mechanisms that disrupt protein production, protein processing, channel regulation and channel conduction. Importantly, many CF-associated mutations have some residual Cl channel function when

Inhibitors of CFTR

Some diseases, such as polycystic kidney disease and secretory diarrhoea, might involve increased activity of the CFTR Cl channel8, 9; this suggests that the development of therapeutically active inhibitors of CFTR might prove to be of value in the treatment of disease. A variety of agents with diverse chemical structures inhibit CFTR (Fig. 1b). These agents have several characteristics in common: all are anions, most are lipophilic and many are large in size.

Concluding remarks

A molecular understanding of the pharmacology of the CFTR Cl channel is beginning to emerge. Researchers have identified activators and inhibitors of CFTR, explored structure–activity relationships and investigated the mechanism of action of CFTR modulators. Nevertheless, knowledge of the molecular pharmacology of CFTR remains superficial and many questions remain to be addressed.

A particularly important question is the identity of the binding sites for activators of CFTR. Although there is

Acknowledgements

We thank our laboratory colleagues for helpful discussions, M. E. Krouse and S. M. Travis for valuable comments, and C. Randak for permission to cite work prior to publication. T-C. H. is supported by the National Institutes of Health, the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and the American Heart Association, Missouri Affiliate. D. N. S. is supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, the Cystic Fibrosis Trust, and the National Kidney Research Fund.

References (60)

  • M.J. Welsh et al.

    Cell

    (1993)
  • T. Yamamoto

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1983)
  • N. Arispe et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1998)
  • T. Akiyama

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1987)
  • S. McDonough et al.

    Neuron

    (1994)
  • F.M. Ashcroft et al.

    Trends Neurosci.

    (1998)
  • C.J. Venglarik et al.

    Biophys. J.

    (1996)
  • M. Cheung et al.

    Biophys. J.

    (1996)
  • C.A. Doupnik et al.

    Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.

    (1995)
  • J.R. Riordan

    Science

    (1989)
  • J.W. Hanrahan
  • D.C. Dawson et al.
  • D.C. Gadsby et al.

    Physiol. Rev.

    (1999)
  • D.N. Sheppard et al.

    Physiol. Rev.

    (1999)
  • M.J. Welsh et al.
  • D.C. Gadsby et al.

    Annu. Rev. Physiol.

    (1995)
  • L.P. Sullivan et al.

    Physiol. Rev.

    (1998)
  • S.E. Gabriel et al.

    Science

    (1994)
  • B.D. Schultz et al.

    Physiol. Rev.

    (1999)
  • R.C. Boucher

    J. Clin. Invest.

    (1999)
  • P.L. Zeitlin

    J. Clin. Invest.

    (1999)
  • M.L. Drumm

    Science

    (1991)
  • F. Becq

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1994)
  • Z. He et al.

    Am. J. Physiol.

    (1998)
  • L. Al-Nakkash et al.

    Pflügers Arch.

    (1999)
  • B.E. Cohen

    Biochemistry

    (1997)
  • V. Chappe

    Br. J. Pharmacol.

    (1998)
  • B. Illek

    Am. J. Physiol.

    (1995)
  • I.C-H. Yang et al.

    Am. J. Physiol.

    (1997)
  • B. Illek et al.

    Am. J. Physiol.

    (1998)
  • Cited by (120)

    • CFTR potentiators: from bench to bedside

      2017, Current Opinion in Pharmacology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text