Review
Dopamine transporters and neuronal injury

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-6147(99)01379-6Get rights and content

Abstract

The plasma membrane dopamine transporter (DAT) and the vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT2) are essential for normal dopamine neurotransmission. DAT terminates the actions of dopamine by rapidly removing dopamine from the synapse, whereas VMAT2 loads cytoplasmic dopamine into vesicles for storage and subsequent release. Recent data suggest that perturbation of the tightly regulated balance between these two transporters predisposes the neurone to damage by a variety of insults. Most notable is the selective degeneration of DAT- and VMAT2-expressing dopamine nerve terminals in the striatum thought to underlie Parkinson’s disease. DAT and VMAT2 expression can predict the selective vulnerability of neuronal populations, which suggests that therapeutic strategies aimed at altering DAT and VMAT2 function could have significant benefits in a variety of disorders.

Section snippets

DAT is a molecular gateway for toxins

Although DAT expression is essential for normal dopamine neurotransmission, it also renders the dopamine neurone susceptible to damage by toxins that can be transported by DAT. Because many potentially toxic substances resemble dopamine and are thus substrates for DAT, they can be accumulated in the dopaminergic neurone by DAT. Inside the neurone, these compounds can disrupt mitochondrial function or react with other vulnerable targets (see Fig. 1a). A prime example is

Genetic knockout

One of the most valuable tools for understanding the function of a particular protein is the genetic deletion of the protein of interest, commonly known as a ‘knockout’. By inserting a specific sequence of DNA that disrupts normal transcription of the gene (typically encoding antibiotic resistance to aid in the selection of mutant gene), expression of the particular protein is effectively blocked. Because a particular protein is encoded by two copies of a gene it is necessary to have the gene

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health NS-37031 to AIL, ES-09248 to GWM, and HL-19576 to MGC. MGC is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. RRG is a visiting scientist from the Institute of Pharmacology, Moscow, Russia.

References (79)

  • B. Giros et al.

    Trends Pharmacol. Sci.

    (1993)
  • Y. Liu

    Cell

    (1992)
  • K. Chiba et al.

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (1985)
  • S. Shimada et al.

    Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res.

    (1992)
  • A.J. Daniels et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1988)
  • Y. Moriyama et al.

    Arch. Biochem. Biophys.

    (1993)
  • S.G. Speciale

    Neuroscience

    (1998)
  • A. Zuddas et al.

    Exp. Neurol.

    (1994)
  • I. Irwin

    Brain Res.

    (1990)
  • G.W. Miller et al.

    Methods Enzymol.

    (1998)
  • G.W. Miller

    Exp. Neurol.

    (1999)
  • E.A. Fon

    Neuron

    (1997)
  • Y.M. Wang

    Neuron

    (1997)
  • A. Vaccari et al.

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (1995)
  • J.T. Kuikka

    Neurosci. Lett.

    (1998)
  • I.D. Waldman

    Am. J. Hum. Genet.

    (1998)
  • A.P. Patel et al.

    Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res.

    (1994)
  • B.J. Brockel et al.

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1998)
  • M.J. Boykin et al.

    Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.

    (1991)
  • D.R. Sibley

    Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.

    (1999)
  • R.D. Blakely

    Nature

    (1991)
  • J.D. Fritz et al.

    J. Neurochem.

    (1998)
  • S. Shimada

    Science

    (1991)
  • M.J. Kuhar

    Ciba Found. Symp.

    (1992)
  • J.D. Erickson et al.

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1992)
  • S. Schuldiner et al.

    Physiol. Rev.

    (1995)
  • Y. Liu et al.

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1992)
  • D. Peter

    J. Neurosci.

    (1995)
  • J.D. Erickson

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1996)
  • J.W. Langston et al.

    Science

    (1983)
  • R.E. Heikkila et al.

    Nature

    (1984)
  • J.A. Javitch et al.

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1985)
  • M.K. Sanghera

    NeuroReport

    (1997)
  • C. Pifl et al.

    J. Neurosci.

    (1993)
  • S. Kitayama et al.

    Ann. Neurol.

    (1992)
  • D. Ben–Shachar et al.

    J. Neurochem.

    (1995)
  • T.G. Hastings et al.

    Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.

    (1996)
  • J.F. Reinhard et al.

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1987)
  • M. Del Zompo

    Br. J. Pharmacol.

    (1993)
  • Cited by (295)

    • Altering the development of the dopaminergic system through social play in rats: Implications for anxiety, depression, hyperactivity, and compulsivity

      2021, Neuroscience Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      DA reuptake occurs via the dopamine transporter (DAT), a transmembrane Na+/K+ - dependent protein, member of the solute carrier 6 (SLC6) family. The pharmacological inhibition of the transporter can be studied as a solution to neurological and psychological disorders such as Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), depression, addiction, schizophrenia and Tourette syndrome [43,69]. In humans, the DAT is coded by the SLC6A3 gene (or DAT1) present on chromosome 5p15.32, composed of 15 exons spanning 60 kb; it encodes 620 amino acids with many putative N-glycosylation sites that, for the transport of dopamine, need glycosylation [9].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text