Elsevier

Neuropharmacology

Volume 38, Issue 3, 14 March 1999, Pages 361-373
Neuropharmacology

Design and models for estimating antagonist potency (pA2, Kd and IC50) following the detection of antagonism observed in the presence of intrinsic activity

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3908(98)00185-3Get rights and content

Abstract

The antagonist activity of the metabotropic glutamate receptor ligand (2S,1′S,2′S)-2-methyl-2(carboxycyclopropyl)glycine (MCCG) was examined using the [35S]GTPγS binding and forskolin (FSK)-stimulated adenosine 3′:5′-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP) assays with recombinant Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing the G protein-coupled human subtype 2 metabotropic glutamate (hmGlu2) receptor. Whereas MCCG proved to be a partial agonist in the GTPγS binding assay, it not only antagonized the agonist effect of (1S,3R)-ACPD in the cAMP assay but further produced an anomalous increase of the cAMP level relative to baseline. The anomalous MCCG response was also observed following treatment of the cells with MCCG in the absence of added agonist. Determination of the glutamate concentration in the incubate at the start and end of the cAMP reaction revealed the existence of micromolar concentrations of cellularly released glutamate throughout the course of the assay, reaching levels which exceeded its reported affinity for the mGlu2 receptor. Considering MCCG’s partial agonist effect in the GTPγS binding assay and its pseudo-inverse agonist effect in the cAMP assay, available methods of estimating its antagonist potency were inappropriate since the classical Schild method and the alternative model suggested by Waud both assume the antagonist to lack a concentration-response relationship. We derived an alternate design and models that permit estimation of the pA2 (pAx), Kd and IC50 for antagonists which produce a concentration related effect when applied by themselves. With their use, the data acquired in both assays support the designation of MCCG as a competitive antagonist of the hmGlu2 receptor and provide similar pA2 estimates between assays. In addition, the newly derived models and design permit the determination of antagonist potency for partial and inverse agonists so characterized in studies employing the Schild design.

Introduction

The potencies of pharmacological competitive antagonists are commonly expressed in terms of pA2 values or in general pAx values. The term pA2 is defined as the negative logarithm to base 10 of the antagonist concentration (expressed in molar units) corresponding to a dose-ratio of 2 (i.e. the concentration that produces a 2-fold shift in the agonist concentration-response curve). The potencies of competitive antagonists are also expressed in terms of Kd, the dissociation constant of the antagonist for the receptor. Schild (1957) derived the followinglog10DR−1=−log10Kd+log10ANAGwhere DR is the dose ratio and [ANAG] is the molar concentration of the antagonist. A Schild plot of log10(DR-1) against log10[ANAG], that allows calculation of Kd, is generally constructed fromlog10DR−1=−log10Kd+Schild·log10ANAGwhich also permits estimation of the Schild slope. The parameter pA2=log10KdSchild can be estimated from Eq. (2). We refer to this method as the ‘Schild Method’. For a competitive antagonist, the law of mass action further dictates that the Schild slope equals unity and that the maximum agonist responses observed in the absence and presence of different antagonist concentrations be not significantly different from each other.

Procedures (both design and model) for estimating Kd and pA2 have also been developed from the results of an antagonist inhibition curve in the presence of a fixed concentration of the agonist (Waud, 1975, Waud, 1976). Lazareno and Birdsall (1993a) have studied this method extensively by comparing it to Gaddum, 1957, Schild, 1957 and Cheng and Prusoff (Cheng and Prusoff, 1973) equations. A six parameter nonlinear model (Eq. (A5) in the Appendix) is generally fit in such a situation. This nonlinear model simultaneously uses both the agonist and antagonist concentrations. The model constructs dose ratios as the ratio of two EC50 values of the agonist in the presence and absence of the antagonist, where both the EC50 values produce the same response. This definition of dose ratio is valid only under the assumption that the curves have the same minima and maxima. The pA2 and IC50 values for the antagonist are obtained by expressing these quantities as functions of the six parameters (first Eq. in (A6) and (A7)). We refer to this method as the ‘Waud Method’.

Neither of these approaches permit the evaluation of antagonist potencies for compounds that are not pure antagonists (e.g. partial and inverse agonists) since each alter baseline minima and maxima, respectively. For the same reason, they are also inadequate in situations where antagonists, though lacking intrinsic activity are studied in the presence of receptor stimulation, be it agonist-independent (e.g. constitutive) or agonist-dependent (e.g. the study of glutamate antagonists in situations where the cellular release of glutamate into the incubate permits stimulation of expressed mGlu receptors) activity. In these situations, we propose models or extensions of the Waud model for the estimation of pA2 (pAx), Kd, and IC50. The derivations of the proposed models are presented in the Appendix section. The proposed models have been examined using data sets from actual experiments and the results are discussed.

Section snippets

Chemicals

The mGlu receptor specific agonist (1S,3R)-1-aminocyclopentane-1,3-dicarboxylate ((1S,3R)-ACPD) and mGlu2 receptor selective antagonist (2S,l′S,2′S)-2-methyl-2(carboxycyclopropyl)glycine (MCCG) were purchased from Tocris Cookson, St Louis, MO. Concentrations of these compounds were expressed in micromolar (μM) units.

Biological assays

Since receptor stimulation results in responses that are either directly or inversely proportional to agonist concentration, separate mathematical models have been derived to

Results

Results obtained in the [35S]GTPγS binding assay, where the agonist response is directly proportional (Case I) to receptor stimulation are presented graphically in Fig. 1. The graph reveals the concentration-dependent responses, measured in dpms obtained following treatment of the homogenate with the agonist (1S,3R)-ACPD (□). An inverse prediction calculated on the basis of this regression analysis revealed the EC90 to be approximately 10 μM. Responses obtained following application of the

Discussion

Two biological assays were selected to examine mathematical models derived to assess the potency and the competitive nature of the antagonism observed with MCCG, an antagonist that displays intrinsic activity. Both assays were based on the interaction between the agonist (1S,3R)-ACPD and/or the antagonist MCCG with the G protein-coupled hmGlu2 receptor. Although (1S,3R)-ACPD is generally accepted as a non-selective mGlu receptor agonist, the partial agonist activity displayed by MCCG has

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of Dr Thomas Copenhaver, Director of Biometrics Research at Wyeth–Ayerst Research.

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (10)

  • ERα-agonist and ERβ-antagonist bifunctional next-generation bisphenols with no halogens: BPAP, BPB, and BPZ

    2021, Toxicology Letters
    Citation Excerpt :

    Each assay followed by an activity evaluation was performed exactly as described above for transcription activation activity. Using the obtained EC50 values, we carried out a Schild plot analysis (Arunklakshana and Schild, 1959; Ghosh et al., 1999) to assess the pA2 value. Data are presented as means ± SD for the indicated number of separate experiments.

  • Bisphenol AF: Halogen bonding effect is a major driving force for the dual ERα-agonist and ERβ-antagonist activities

    2020, Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry
    Citation Excerpt :

    An examination of the capability of antagonist drugs can be performed by two different methods. First of all, all the CX3-containing BPE analogs were analyzed by the Schild plot pA2 analysis method.24,25 We initially evaluated graded concentrations of the agonist E2 in the reporter gene assay of ERβ in the presence of BPE analogs of different fixed concentrations (0.01, 0.1, 1.0, and 10 μM).

  • Glutamate receptor involvement in dentate granule cell epileptiform activity evoked by mossy fiber stimulation

    2001, Brain Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    Neither concentration altered short-latency epileptiform activity (Fig. 4, Table 1). MCCG is generally regarded as a selective antagonist of type II metabotropic glutamate receptors [1,19,22], but it has exhibited partial agonist properties in some tests [4,13]. At a concentration of 500 μM, MCCG reversed the inhibitory effect of DCG-IV on short-latency epileptiform activity (Fig. 5).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text