Benzo[a]pyrene diol-epoxide DNA adducts and levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in autoptic samples from human lungs

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2797(98)00091-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) and other polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) which are present in cigarette smoke, are common air and food genotoxic contaminants and possible human carcinogens. We measured the following PAH levels: benzo[a]anthracene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, BaP, dibenzo[a,h]anthracene, benzo[g,h,i]perylene as well as (±) syn and anti BaP diol-epoxide (BPDE) DNA adducts in autopsy samples from the lungs of non-smokers, ex-smokers and smokers who had lived in Florence, Italy. PAH levels in lung tissue were similar in all groups, with the exception of dibenzo[a,h]anthracene (DBA), which was higher in lung samples from smokers (n=10, 0.18±0.17 ng/g d.w, mean ±S.D.) compared to non-smokers (n=15, 0.046±0.025 ng/g d.w) (P<0.05), whereas ex-smokers (n=5), had intermediate levels (0.07±0.03 ng/g d.w). The average level of total BPDE-DNA adducts was 4.46±5.76 per 108 bases in smokers, 4.04±2.37 per 108 in ex-smokers and 1.76±1.69 per 108 in non-smokers. The levels of non-smokers were significantly different (P<0.05) from the levels of the smokers and ex-smokers combined. Total BPDE-DNA adducts were correlated with BaP levels in the lung samples in which both determinations were obtained (r=0.63). Our results demonstrate that the biological load of PAHs due to environmental pollution is similar in individuals who smoke and those who do not, but BPDE-DNA adducts are higher in smokers and ex-smokers compared to non-smokers. This study further confirms the usefulness of BPDE-DNA adduct levels determination in the lungs from autopsy samples for monitoring long-term human exposure to BaP, a representative PAH.

Introduction

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in many countries 1, 2, and cigarette smoke is considered to be one of its main determinants 3, 4, along with environmental pollution [5]. Since polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are potent mutagens, carcinogens and ubiquitous contaminants, they have been the object of extensive studies, but their contribution to the aetiology of human lung cancer either through exposure to polluted air [6]or smoking [7], remains controversial. PAHs, after metabolic activation, generate electrophilic species that covalently bind to DNA. In the case of benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), the formation of DNA adducts of BaP diol-epoxide (BPDE) is thought to play a role in the early stages of carcinogenesis, causing long-term genetic damage 8, 9, 10. Thus, these DNA adducts may be used as a biomarker of internal BaP exposure.

A number of studies have been published on the levels of aromatic DNA adducts in white blood cells using 32P-postlabelling to determine BPDE-DNA adducts in smokers and non-smokers 11, 12, 13, 14, or in subjects professionally exposed to PAHs 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20. However the determination of aromatic DNA adducts in peripheral white blood cells and the attempt to find a correlation with lung carcinogenesis is questionable, since these cells have a short life span and are not the primary target for PAHs. On the contrary, the determination of BPDE-DNA adducts and of parent hydrocarbon levels in human lung samples is a more reliable indicator of the effective internal PAH dose. Therefore, the determination of DNA aromatic adduct levels in the target organ is, whenever possible, the most appropriate approach.

Accordingly, several studies have been published on total DNA aromatic adducts in human lung autoptic samples [21], and bronchial biopsies 22, 23, 24, using 32P-postlabelling, an assay, which while reportedly more sensitive for detecting total DNA adduct levels, by itself does not allow the chemical identification of individual adducts.

Shields et al. [25]and Andreassen et al. [26], addressed this problem by coupling immunoaffinity chromatography with HPLC/synchronous fluorescence in order to detect specific BPDE-DNA adducts in the lungs of smokers and non-smokers. More recently improved HPLC/fluorometric assays (HPLC/FD) have been described 14, 27, 28, 29.

In this study we measured (±) syn and anti BPDE-DNA adducts by HPLC/FD and the levels of PAHs in autopsy samples from human lungs of non-professionally exposed subjects who had lived in Florence, Italy, in order to assess exposure to BaP and its correlation with BPDE-DNA adducts. The valley of Florence is characterised by a relatively uniform level of pollution from PAHs, mainly deriving from automotive emissions and wood combustion 30, 31.

Section snippets

Sample collection

Human lung specimens were obtained from autopsies performed by the Department of Pathology, University of Florence for routine microscopy. All samples were obtained from the same area of the lungs (apex of left inferior lobe). Following autopsy they were immediately frozen at −20°C in the Department of Pathology until analysis, which was completed within 30 days. Three lung samples were conserved and divided into three pieces to be analysed weekly in order to assess the relative stability of

Statistical analysis

Data were analysed with the Statgraphic Statistical Package (Manugistic, Cambridge, MD, USA) using linear regression analysis and one-way analysis of variance.

Results

Fig. 1 shows a chromatogram obtained from two standard BaP-tetrols (insert a); a sample of lung BPDE-DNA adducts obtained from a smoker (insert b) and from a non-smoker (insert c). The BaP-tetrols had a good chromatographic separation and no interfering peaks appeared.

PAH levels, determined in post-mortem lung tissues from non-smokers, ex-smokers and smokers were similar, with the exception of DBA which was significantly higher in smokers compared to non-smokers; ex-smokers had intermediate

Discussion

A number of papers 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, have been published on the levels of BPDE-adducts in white blood cells of individuals exposed to PAHs professionally and/or with cigarette smoke. They indicate in general that high exposure is associated with an increased level of aromatic adducts and with a high variability between groups and individuals. However, the determination of the level of adducts in peripheral blood cells, although certainly an indicator of exposure, does

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by funds of MURST 60%, Italy.

References (38)

  • H Bartsch

    DNA adducts in human carcinogenesis: etiological relevance and structure-activity relationship

    Mutat. Res.

    (1996)
  • American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts and Figures, Atlanta: American Cancer Society,...
  • Patterns of cancer in five continents in: S.L. Whelan, D.M. Parking, E. Masuyer (Eds.), IARC Scientific Publications...
  • D.H Phillips

    Fifty years of BaP

    Nature

    (1983)
  • G Lindstedt et al.

    Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the occupational work environment

    Scand. J. Work Environ. Health

    (1982)
  • Polynuclear aromatic compounds, Part 3: Industrial exposure in aluminium production, coal, gasification, coke...
  • Tobacco smoking, IARC Monographs no. 38, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1986, pp....
  • L You et al.

    Tumour multiplicity, DNA adducts and K-ras mutation pattern of 5-methylchrysene in strain A/J mouse lung

    Carcinogenesis

    (1994)
  • J.A Ross et al.

    Adenomas induced by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in strain A/J mouse lung correlate with time-integrated DNA adduct levels

    Cancer Res.

    (1995)
  • Cited by (61)

    • Benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) metabolites predominant in human plasma following escalating oral micro-dosing with [<sup>14</sup>C]-BaP

      2022, Environment International
      Citation Excerpt :

      Further, BaP-mediated AHR activation also stimulates the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling cascade, altering cellular processes including those fundamental to mitigating effects like BaP-induced DNA damage (Vázquez-Gómez et al., 2018). Concentrations of BaP in blood, urine, and tissue, as well as covalent adducts, are used as biomarkers of BaP exposure and risk (Lodovici et al., 1998; Obana et al., 1981; Ross et al., 1995). Human exposure can occur as a result of environmental contamination, like an oil spill or wildfire, through ingestion, smoking, or occupational exposures such as asphalt paving or iron work (Brandt and Watson, 2003; Pastorelli et al., 2000; Tuominen et al., 2002).

    • A look beyond the priority: A systematic review of the genotoxic, mutagenic, and carcinogenic endpoints of non-priority PAHs

      2021, Environmental Pollution
      Citation Excerpt :

      This list of 16 US - EPA PAHs plays an extremely important role as a regularized set of chemical compounds to be analyzed, especially in environmental investigations; however, this list has never been updated. A substantial amount of information has been accumulated on the carcinogenic and mutagenic potential of the 16 US - EPA priority PAHs using different experimental models (Ke et al., 2018; Krishnamurthi et al., 2006; Lodovici et al., 1998; Luckert et al., 2013; Stout et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2015; White, 2002; Yan et al., 2004). However, several years of research on the toxic effects of other PAHs cannot be overlooked.

    • A micro-scale analytical method combined with PTV-GC–MS to determine polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in human lungs

      2020, Microchemical Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the quantitative exposure–response relationship is less clear. PAH determination in the lungs represents an analytical challenge due to their low concentrations (pg or ng), low amount of available sample and complexity of the matrix [22–25], as the lungs contain mainly proteins, sugars, and fatty acids [26]. Therefore, efficient, sensitive, and selective analytical methodologies are required for PAH determination.

    • Toxicokinetics of benzo[a]pyrene in humans: Extensive metabolism as determined by UPLC-accelerator mass spectrometry following oral micro-dosing

      2019, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Somewhat surprisingly, history of exposure (smoking, occupational) has been reported as not significantly elevating BaP-DHDE-DNA adducts in PBMCs or other tissues (Boysen and Hecht, 2003; Carstensen et al., 1999). Other studies report modestly higher levels in smoker's compared to non- or ex-smokers (Lodovici et al., 1998; Villalta et al., 2017) Examination of 10 human lung biopsy samples by Monein et al. (2015) found no detectable (LOD 1–3 adducts per 108 nucleotides) BaP-DHDE-dG adducts. Recent advances in methodology, leading to increased specificity and sensitivity for assaying BaP-DNA adducts, have improved (LOD of ~ 1 adduct in 1011 nucleotides).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text